Effects of neutralizing or antioxidant agents on the consequences induced by enamel bleaching agents in immediate resin composite restorations

Purpose: Bleaching agents are claimed to impair the bonding to the tooth structure when resin composite restorations are immediately performed. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of a neutralizing solution (10% sodium bicarbonate) or an antioxidant agent (10% sodium ascorbate) on the immediate or delayed (15 days) shear bond strength (SBS) of composite restorations performed on enamel. Seventy flat buccal enamel surfaces obtained from bovine incisors were divided into seven groups (n = 10): control group, unbleached enamel, restored (3M ESPE/Adper Single Bond 2/Filtek Z350XT) (G1); bleached, immediately restored (G2); bleached, delayed restoration (G3); bleached, antioxidant (sodium ascorbate), immediately restored (G4); bleached, antioxidant, delayed restoration (G5); bleached, neutralizing (sodium bicarbonate), immediate restoration (G6); bleached, neutralizing, delayed restoration (G7). Specimens were submitted to SBS test and examined after failure using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Results were statistically analyzed with ANOVA/Tukey’s tests (5%). Bonding to enamel immediately restored after bleaching (G2) was significantly lower than G1 (unbleached enamel; p < 0.05). Applying the antioxidant or neutralizing agent significantly improved the bonding to enamel compared with G2 (bleached, immediate restored), irrespective of the restoration time (immediate or delayed) (p < 0.05). No significance was found between the two agents when applied after bleaching, and compared with the control group, regardless of evaluation time (p > 0.05). SEM images demonstrated adhesive failures in the bleached, immediately restored group (G2). G3–G7 exhibited majority of cohesive and mixed failure patterns. 10% sodium bicarbonate or 10% sodium ascorbate neutralizes the negative immediate and delayed effects of bleaching on bond strength of enamel bleached enamel.     

The shear bond strength of repaired high-viscosity bulk-fill resin composites with different adhesive systems and resin composite types

This study compared the effect of different adhesive systems and composite resins on the shear bond strength (SBS) of repaired high-viscosity bulk-fill composites(Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill) and investigated failure modes. One hundred twenty cylindrical bulk-fill composite blocks (diameter 5?mm) were fabricated and thermocycled for 5000 cycles (5–55?°C). Specimens were roughened by diamond bur and divided into 8 groups (n?=?15). Bulk-fill blocks were repaired with the same material or nanohybrid composite resin(Tetric EvoCeram Nanohybrid) (diameter 3?mm) using different adhesive systems:Tetric N-Bond Universal (TSE);37% phosphoric acid etching?+?Tetric N-Bond Universal (TER); Clearfil SE Bond (CSE); 37% phosphoric acid etching?+?Adper^TMSingle Bond 2(SB). After repair procedures, all specimens were thermocycled again. The shear bond strengths were measured for all specimens using a universal test machine (crosshead speed of 1?mm/min). Cohesive strengths of bulk-fill composites were measured and described as control group. Debonded surfaces were observed with a stereomicroscope under 10x magnification to determine mode of failure. The SBS data of all groups was statistically analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Bonferroni correction test (p?<?0.05). The specimens repaired with bulk-fill composites showed significantly higher SBS values (25.86?±?5.74, 27.05?±?4.93, 24.49?±?6.95MPa) than those with nanohybrid composites (20.41?±?3.70, 22.08?±?6.37, 18.74?±?6.40?MPa) for TER,CSE,SB, respectively (p?<?0.05). There were no significant differences in SBS according to the type of adhesive systems for both repair materials (p?>?0.05). The predominant mode of failure was a mixed type in the restorative material except for the ones repaired with nanohybrid composites using Adper^TMSingle Bond 2. High-viscosity bulk-fill composites could be successfully repaired with the same materials. SBS of repaired bulk-fill composites reached cohesive strength for all tested groups.     

Effects of enamel surface preparation on bonding strength of resin-modified glass ionomer cement: an in vitro study

The purpose of this study was to evaluate a more suitable and efficient preparation method of enamel surface and a safe duration of loading in orthodontics when bonding with resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC). 300 human premolars were divided into five groups: G0, etched–Transbond XT; G1, etched–moistened; G2, etched–dry; G3, unetched–moistened; and G4, unetched–dry. Using an universal testing machine, we measured shear bonding strength (SBS) and tensile bonding strength (TBS) at 30 min, 24 h, and 30 d post-bonding. The adhesive remnant index was evaluated using stereomicroscopy. The results showed that enamel surface etching significantly improved SBS and TBS of RMGIC. The moist environment could accelerate both of SBS and TBS, but not the final bonding strength. Etching with moistening was the best processing method with RMGIC. When using RMGIC on unetched enamel, the bonding surface should be moistened and loading time delayed. When evaluating mechanical properties of the adhesive materials, it seemed that the TBS was more reasonable and objective than the SBS.     

Effect of different dentin adhesives and application modes on sealing ability of amalgam restorations

Purpose: The aim of the study was to evaluate the sealing ability of bonded amalgam restorations using different adhesive materials with different adhesive application methods including amalgam bonding application. Materials and methods: The prepared Class-V cavities were randomly assigned to four application groups of four tested dual-curing dentin adhesives (Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus, XP Bond, Xeno IV and Clearfil Liner Bond 2V), dual-curing resin-based cement (Panavia F2.0) and a control group (unlined amalgam). Group 1 adhesives were applied according to the instructions for direct light-curing, Group 2 chemical-curing mode was applied according to the manufacturer’s amalgam bonding instructions. Group 3 adhesives were first applied in light-curing mode, and then amalgam bonding adhesive was applied. Group 4 adhesives were first applied in chemical-curing mode, followed immediately by light-curing mode. After that, amalgam adhesive parts were applied; then, the amalgam was condensed and carved. After storage for 24 h in distilled water at 37 °C, restorations were finished and polished. The teeth were then thermocycled (500 cycles between 5 and 55 °C), and the specimens were examined for microleakage using methylene blue as a marker. Results: Compared to the control group, the adhesive application modes significantly reduced microleakage for both dentin and enamel margins (p < 0.05). In dentin margins of the adhesives tested, Group 4 showed the lowest leakage score. On the enamel margins for Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus and XP Bond, Group 1 showed the highest microleakage (p < 0.05). Conclusion: According to marginal sealing ability and ease of application, Group 2 was recommended for the etch and rinse systems, and Group 4 was also recommended for the self-etch systems under amalgam restorations.     

Microtensile versus microshear bond strength between dental adhesives and the dentin substrate

This study evaluated the performance of different bonding tests on the bond strength of three adhesive systems to dentin. Forty-eight bovine incisors were used in the study, which were allocated in two groups according to the bond strength test performed: microtensile (µTBS) or microshear (µSBS). Also, each group was divided in three subgroups according to the adhesive system applied: Single Bond (SB), Prime & Bond (PB) and XP Bond (XPB) (n=8). The teeth were prepared according to each bond strength test protocol, and then the specimens were tested in an universal testing machine (EMIC). The data were submitted to two-way ANOVA (bond strength test and adhesive system type factors) and Tukey's post hoc test (α=0.05). The µTBS results were higher for all the adhesives when compared to the µSBS ones. Within the µTBS results, SB showed higher bond strength than PB and XPB, which showed similar adhesive performance among each other; within the µSBS results, all the adhesives presented similar bond strength values to dentin. The µTBS test detected differences between the adhesive systems evaluated; in contrast, the µSBS test was less discriminating in evaluating the adhesive performance of the materials tested.     

Shear Bond Strength Evaluation of Orthodontic Brackets Bonded to Fluorotic Teeth with a Self-Etching Primer and a New Generation of Color Bonding

The objective of this work was to evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) and bond failure site of brackets bonded to teeth with fluorosis treated with and without microabrasion before placement of a self-etching primer (SEP) and a color-changing composite and to compare with a control group. This in vitro study included 120 premolars with and without dental fluorosis, divided into six groups: (1) healthy enamel etched for 15 sec and fifth generation primer, (2) healthy enamel, (3) mild fluorosis (MIF) enamel, (4) MIF enamel microabraded, (5) moderate fluorosis (MOF) enamel, and (6) MOF enamel microabraded. For groups 2–6, an SEP was used. All samples were evaluated with the SBS test and the modified adhesive remnant index (ARI). The highest SBS mean value was for healthy enamel etched for 15 sec and fifth generation primer and the lowest SBS mean value was for healthy enamel with SEP. Significant differences were found in the ARI between healthy and MOF groups. SBS of orthodontic brackets bonded on fluorotic teeth with an SEP and a new generation of color bonding could be clinically acceptable as the value obtained was above the suggested minimum required for orthodontic bonding.     

Efficacy of multi-mode adhesive systems on dentin wettability and microtensile bond strength of resin composite

Purpose: To evaluate the wetting ability and the microtensile bond strength of adhesive systems in various depths of dentin. Materials and Method: 48 extracted human molars cut in half in buccolingual direction. Buccal and lingual surfaces were used to obtain deep (n = 48) and superficial (n = 48) dentin. Groups were divided into 4 subgroups: Self-etch (CSE), etch&rinse (SB), multi-mode self-etch (SAU) and multimode etch&rinse (EAU) adhesive systems. 3 consecutive contact-angle measurements were obtained: T0- 3 μl drop of distilled water on dentin; T1-Droplet of the adhesive; T2- Distilled water after polymerization of the adhesive. After composite build-ups, microtensile measurements were performed. Contact angle data were analysed with analysis of variance for repeated measures. Bond strength data were analyzed by repeated measures analysis of variance, comparisons were made according to the logarithmic values (p < 0.05). Results: The difference between groups was not significant regardless of dentin depth for all measurements (p < 0.05). All groups except CSE enhanced the wetting ability of the adhesive but reduced the wetting ability of distilled water after application of the adhesive (p < 0.05). Regarding adhesive systems, the groups showed no significant difference between bond strengths to various depths of dentin except SAU (p > 0.05); in SAU, bond strength to deep dentine were significantly higher than superficial dentin (p < 0.05). Regarding adhesives’ bond strength, CSE showed significantly greater values than the other groups (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The cavity depth does not affect the bonding ability for all adhesive systems; self-etch adhesive systems might be a better choice since different adhesives may influence the wetting ability and microtensile bond strength of the dentin substrates.     

The role of surface-sealant application on bond effectiveness of all-in-one self-etch adhesives

Purpose: To examine microleakage around Class-V restorations bonded with 3 current all-in-one adhesive systems in the presence or absence of surface-sealant in different evaluation groups.

Materials and Methods: Clearfil S3 Bond, G-Aenial Bond, and Optibond All-in-One (AiO), were used in the Class-V cavities in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions (control group) or were additionally combined with Fortify Plus surface-sealant (surface-sealant group). The two main treatment groups of the dentin adhesives were subdivided into four different evaluation groups (24 h, 6 months, 12 months, and 12 months with two applications); the teeth were immersed in 0.5% methylene blue dye solution for 24 h. Samples were then sectioned longitudinally in a bucco-lingual direction and evaluated for microleakage under a stereomicroscope. Dye penetration was scored at the enamel (occlusal) and dentin (gingival) margins.

Results: Microleakage scores were greater at the dentin margins compared with the enamel margins for Clearfil S3 Bond in all evaluation groups, whereas no difference was observed between enamel and dentin microleakage for Optibond AiO. Using Fortify Plus in the enamel margins decreased the microleakage scores of Clearfil S3 Bond. When the control and surface-sealant groups were compared in the G-Aenial Bond enamel margins, the application of surface-sealant significantly reduced microleakage after 6 and 12 months. For Optibond AiO, no statistically significant differences in enamel and dentin margins were observed between the control and surface-sealant application groups.

Conclusion: The application of surface-sealant could be considered appropriate for reducing microleakage in composite resin restorations, but this effect might depend on the dentin adhesive.     

Effects of two metal primers on the shear bond strength of orthodontic molar tubes bonded to silver amalgam restorations of different dimensions

The aim of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of orthodontic molar tubes bonded to amalgam restorations and enamel with four different area ratios, with and without the use of various metal primers. One hundred and fifty-six sound lower first molars were divided into five groups; control group (CG;n = 12) then divided into three subgroups: A, B, and C. Class V buccal amalgam restorations consisting of 25%(G1), 50%(G2), 75%(G3), and 100%(G4) of the basal areas of the molar tubes. Transbond XT Primer (TXTP;subgroup A), Alloy Primer (AP;subgroup B) and Reliance Metal Primer (RMP;subgroup C) (n = 12). Transbond XT was used as an adhesive material in all groups. Thermocycling was as 5 –55 °C, 1000 cycles. Data were analysed by one-way ANOVA and post hoc least significant difference tests (p < 0.05). Bond failure sites were classified using a modified Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) system. SBS did not differ significantly among the three intermediate adhesives in subgroups of groups 1, 2, or 3 (p > 0.05); however, SBS was significantly higher in groups 4B and 4C than in group 4A (p < 0.05). Mean SBSs of groups 1 and 2 were significantly higher than others (p < 0.05). Mean SBS of group 3 was higher than that of group 4, but lower than that of the other groups. For ARI, significant relationships between CG and the intermediate adhesive groups were found (p < 0.05). Application of metal primers, such as AP or RMP, to sandblasted amalgam adjacent to etched enamel (25, 50, and 75%) did not improve bond strength significantly compared with the application of TXTP to amalgam and enamel.     

Comparison of microleakage of a multi-mode adhesive system with contemporary adhesives in class II resin restorations

Aim: The aim was to compare the microleakage of resin composite bonded with different adhesive systems in class-II cavities at enamel or dentine margins. Material and methods: 60 extracted human molar teeth received slot cavity preparations on mesial and distal surfaces (mesial cervical margin was prepared in enamel and distal in dentine). They were randomly divided into five groups (n?=?12) according to the adhesive system: Group-A: Silorane Bond (S), Group-B: Adper Single Bond 2 (SB), Group-C: Clearfil SE Bond (CSE), Group-D: Single Bond Universal (USel) (selective etch-and-rinse), Group-E: Single Bond Universal (USE) (all-in-one). The preparations were restored using the same resin composite (Filtek Ultimate) except Group A which was restored by Silorane composite. The teeth were thermocycled, immersed in dye, sectioned, and dye penetration was evaluated quantitatively using image analysis. The data were analyzed using the two-way analysis of variance and Bonferroni test. Results: In all groups, there was no statistically significant difference between enamel margins at occlusal and gingival sites (p?>?0.05). The statistical difference between Group-A (S) and Group-B (SB) was significant at all margins. Group-B (SB) presented the greatest microleakage amounts at all margins and the highest scores were obtained in the dentine. Likewise, SB demonstrated statistically significant differences between dentine and enamel margins (occlusal and gingival)(p?<?0.05). Conclusion: All adhesive systems showed similar microleakage values between enamel margins in occlusal and gingival regions. However, when the gingival margin is located in the dentine, etch&rinse adhesive systems may not be a choice in terms of microleakage prevention.     

Effect of self etching ceramic primer and universal adhesive on bond strength of lithium disilicate ceramic

The clinical success of ceramic restorations is affected by the ceramic bonding procedure. The objective of the study was to evaluate the effect of different surface treatments, including the use of self-etching ceramic primer (SECP), on resin cement-glass ceramic bond strength. Thirty lithium disilicate ceramic (LDC) rectangles (3 mm × 3 mm × 8 mm) were fabricated Specimens were randomly assigned into three experimental groups (n = 10) according to the surface treatment: Group 1-hydrofluoric acid [HF acid]+ silane + universal adhesive; Group 2-HF + universal adhesive; Group 3-SECP + universal adhesive. All specimens were stored in distilled water for 24 h at 37 °C and shear bond strength (SBS) was tested at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm (Universal Testing machine-Instron). Failure modes were evaluated using a digital microscope for all specimens. Analysis of variance and the Tukey post hoc tests using SPSS (Version 22.0, IBM, New York, USA) were used to analyze data. The SBS of groups 1 (19.74 ± 1.28 MPa) and 3 (21.11 ± 2.07 MPa) were significant higher than group 2 (14.80 ± 1.94 MPa). The SBS values for specimens in groups 1 (19.74 ± 1.28 MPa) and 3 (21.11 ± 2.07 MPa) were comparable. Adhesive, mixed and cohesive failure modes were observed and mixed failure was the most common in all groups. Therefore, the use of SECP and universal adhesive is recommended as an alternative to the use of HF acid in combination with ceramic primer while bonding to LDC.     

Post-treatment with high-power lasers to improve bond strength of adhesive systems to bleached dentin

To assess the effect of Er:YAG and diode lasers on the shear bond strength (SBS) of adhesive systems to bovine dentin submitted to bleaching with a high concentration agent. One hundred and twenty bovine dentin fragments were used. Fragments were distributed into 12 groups (n = 10) considering the bleaching (present or not), surface post-treatment (untreated, Er:YAG laser or diode laser) and adhesive system (total-etching or self-etching). Specimens received two applications of 38% hydrogen peroxide. Er:YAG laser (2940 nm, 200 mJ, 4 Hz) and diode laser (980 nm, 1.5 W) were applied for 15 s on bleached dentin surface. Restoration was performed with resin using split matrix. Specimens were submitted to SBS test and data (MPa) were analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey’s test (α = 0.05). SBS of bleached specimens decreased in comparison with non-bleached (p < 0.05). The highest values were obtained for the post-treatment with Er:YAG laser (p < 0.05). Total-etching adhesive was superior to self-etching system (p < 0.05). The irradiation of bleached dentin with Er:YAG laser followed by the application of the total-etching adhesive had similar SBS to unbleached dentin with no post-treatment (control) (p > 0.05). Er:YAG laser post-treatment followed by the total-etching adhesive system improve the bond strength of restorative material to bleached dentin.     

Effects of chemical and physico-chemical surface conditioning methods on the adhesion of resin composite to different mineral trioxide aggregate based cements

This study investigated the adhesion of resin composite to mineral trioxide aggregate based cements after different chemical and physico-chemical surface conditioning methods. Mineral trioxide aggregate based cements (Biodentine, ProRoot MTA, Imicryl MTA) were embedded in Teflon disks (N?=?180). After storing at 37?°C at 100% humidity for 72?h, substrate surfaces were polished using silicon carbide papers. Specimens were allocated to 3 groups to be conditioned with one of the following (n?=?15 per group): a) Adhesive resin (Clearfil SE Bond, CSE), b) Adhesive resin (Adper Single Bond 2, SB2), c) air-abrasion with 30?μm alumina coated with silica?+?silane?+?adhesive resin (ALB), d) no surface conditioning, control group (CON). Microhybrid resin composite (Filtek Z250) was applied on the conditioned substrate surfaces and photo-polymerized. After storage at 37?°C at 100% humidity for 24?h, adhesive interfaces were loaded under shear (1?mm/min) in a universal testing machine. After debonding failure types were analyzed. Data were analyzed using 2-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test (alpha = 0.05). SBS results were significantly affected by surface conditioning (p?<?0.05) and materials (p?<?0.05). Interaction terms were significant (p?<?0.05). Biodentine-ALB resulted in significantly higher SBS values (3.96?±?1.24) compared to those of other combinations, while ALB and SB2 resulted in no significant difference for ProRoot MTA and Imicryl MTA (p?>?.05). CSE (1.36?±?0.5- 1.98?±?0.76) did not significantly increase SBS for all MTA materials compared to the control group (0.8?±?0.52 – 2?±?0.91) (p?>?9.05). While CON groups resulted in exclusively adhesive failures, ALB presented the highest incidence of mixed failures for all materials tested (60–100%).     

The sonic application of universal adhesives in self-etch mode improves their performance on enamel

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of sonic application of universal adhesives on the enamel microshear bond strengths (µSBS), in situ degree of conversion (DC) and etching pattern. Ninety-six extracted third molars were sectioned in four parts (buccal, lingual, proximal) and divided into 12 groups, according to the combination of 1) adhesive system (All-Bond Universal [ABU], G-Bond Plus [GBP], Prime&Bond Elect (PBE), and Scotchbond Universal Adhesive [SBU]), and 2) adhesive application mode (manual active etch-and-rinse [M-ER], manual active self-etch [M-SE], and sonic vibration self-etch [S-SE]). Specimens were stored in water at 37 °C during 24 h and tested at 1.0 mm/min (µSBS). DC was evaluated in the enamel-resin interfaces using micro-Raman spectroscopy. The enamel-etching pattern was evaluated under a field- emission scanning electron microscope. Data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 0.05). S-SE application increased µSBS and DC for all universal adhesives when compared to M-SE (p < 0.05). S-SE application resulted in mean bond strengths that were statistically similar to those obtained with the respective ER application mode (p > 0.05). A deeper enamel-etching pattern was observed for all universal adhesives in the etch-and-rinse strategy. An improvement in etching ability was observed in S-SE application compared to M-SE application. In light of the improved performance of universal adhesives when applied sonically in SE mode, selective enamel etching with phosphoric acid may not be crucial for their adhesion to enamel. The sonic application of universal adhesives in self-etch mode may be a practical alternative to enamel etching.     

Effect of cigarette smoking on the bond strength between resin cement and dental CAD/CAM ceramics

Although the effects of cigarette smoking on several dental problems have been widely studied, the association between tobacco exposure and resin-ceramic bonding is rarely reported. This study investigated the resin-ceramic adhesion (shear bond strength, SBS) and associated risk factors on three selected dental CAD/CAM ceramics using a novel model to simulate the exposure to cigarette smoking. Specimens from IPS e.max® CAD, Vitabloc® Mark II for Cerec and Zirconia Cercon were prepared and treated using silicacoating and silane. A layer of resin cement was applied on the treated ceramic surfaces and light activated. Specimens were placed in a chamber and challenged with various numbers of cigarettes (0, 1, 5, 10, and 15). Then, the specimens were subjected to SBS test and fractured surfaces were examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometry (EDX) to determine the failure mode and surface composition. Overall, the mean SBS of IPS e.max^® CAD (9.6 ± 3.4 MPa), Vitabloc^® Mark II for Cerec (9.3 ± 2.5 MPa) and Zirconia Cercon (8.7 ± 3.0 MPa) did not show any statistical significant difference (p = 0.192 > 0.05), such that the adhesion of resin bonded to glass-based ceramics (IPS e.max® CAD and Vitabloc® Mark II for Cerec) decreased with cigarette smoke exposure, but increased for the resin bonded to zirconia ceramic (Zirconia Cercon). Furthermore, the number of cigarettes has a statistically significant effect on the SBS (p = 0.001), such that in general 5 cigarettes yielded the lowest mean SBS (7.6 ± 2.1 MPa). SEM-EDX analyses showed mostly adhesive failures in all experimental groups with changes in surface morphology and chemical composition after smoking challenge. Cigarette smoking produces a different effect on resin-ceramic bonding depending on ceramic type that may be due to chemical reactions in the bonding interface and changes in temperature and moisture. Further work should explore the mechanism to which cigarette smoke affects the resin-ceramic bonding and its clinical relevance.     

Nanoleakage within adhesive-dentin interfaces made with simplified ethanol-wet bonding

Objective: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of the simplified ethanol-wet bonding technique and conventional water-wet bonding technique on short term nanoleakage within hybrid layers made with two different etch-and-rinse adhesives (Single Bond 2 and Prime & Bond NT). Materials and methods: Flat dentin surfaces from bovine incisors were prepared and finished with wet 600-grit abrasive papers, then divided into groups to be bonded with one of the adhesives. After etching and rinsing, dentin surfaces were either moistened with water (water-wet bonding technique) or moistened with absolute ethanol for 1 min (ethanol-wet bonding technique). Then, adhesives were applied, and composite buildups were done. Bonded teeth samples were sectioned into resin–dentin samples by means of a low speed diamond saw under water cooling. Specimens were immersed into a 50% (w/v) solution of silver ammoniacal nitrate for 18 h and exposed to photodeveloping solution for 6 h. The amount of silver nitrate uptake within the adhesive layer, or hybrid layer, was measured with energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) in different regions (n = 30). Results: Simplified ethanol-wet bonding significantly reduced nanoleakage within resin–dentin interfaces made with Single Bond 2 and Prime & Bond NT, but improvement at the nanoleakage of Single Bond 2 was only significant. Conclusion: Simplified ethanol-wet bonding may improve quality of hybrid layers made with commercially available simplified etch-and-rinse adhesives. But benefits of ethanol-wet bonding may depend on product.     

Influence of desensitizing procedures on adhesion of resin cements to dentin

This study evaluated the effect of two desensitizer agents with different contents and Nd:YAG laser irradiation on the shear bond strength (SBS) of adhesive resin cements to dentin. New treatment options of Nd:YAG laser irradiation and tetracalcium phosphate-containing agent applications were compared with routinely used glutaraldehyde-containing agents. One hundred and twenty human, caries-free premolars were embedded in acrylic resin blocks 2 mm below the cementoenamel junction. Buccal surfaces of the teeth were ground to expose dentin. The specimens were randomly assigned into three different surface treatments (desensitizing agents, Nd:YAG laser) and the control, then into three different adhesive resin cement applications (n = 10). Resin cements (Panavia SA cement (PA), Panavia SA cement with Clearfil Universal Bond (PACU), and Multilink N (MN)) were applied to the conditioned teeth surfaces using Teflon tubes. The specimens were thermocycled (5000 cycles, 5–55 ± 1 °C, dwell time 30 s). The SBS test was performed in all groups. The results were submitted to two-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD tests (p < .05). Further, SEM analysis was performed on the dentin surfaces. SBS values were significantly difference among the surface treatment groups and also among adhesive resin cement groups (p < .05). The specimen cemented with PA showed lower SBS values than PACU- and MN-applied specimens. The highest SBS value was obtained in the Nd:YAG laser group which was cemented with PACU cement. The lowest SBS value was obtained in the control group which was cemented with PA cement. In addition, SEM evaluation revealed that desensitizing agents and Nd:YAG laser occluded dentin tubules.     

The effect of functional monomer chain spacer length on the bond strength of an experimental dental adhesive

The study evaluated the effect of the carbon-chain spacer of monomers on the bonding effectiveness of two-step self-etching adhesive systems (SES). We investigated three acrylamidophosphonic acid monomers which vary only by the length of the carbon chain, 2-(N-methylmethacrylamido)ethylphosphonic acid, 6-(N-methylmethacrylamido)hexylphosphonic acid and 10-(N-methylmethacrylamido)decylphosphonic acid, on their effect in bonding performance while formulated in a self-etching primer with dentin and enamel. The results correlated well with those obtained from Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM).It is concluded that there are no significant differences in terms of immediate Shear Bond Strength (SBS) on either enamel or dentin by using experimental self-etching primer (SEP) of different spacer chain length.     

The effect of different bonding protocols on the repair microshear bond strength of water-stored CAD/CAM resin composite

This study evaluated the repair microshear bond strength (μSBS) of water stored CAD/CAM resin composite under eight different surface treatments using a silane-containing universal adhesive in etch-and-rinse and self-etching modes. In total, 48 CAD/CAM resin composite slices were prepared from Lava Ultimate CAD/CAM blocks and stored in water for 6 months. The slices were assigned into 8 main groups, according to surface treatments (no treatment, no-treatment/silane, surface grinding, surface grinding/silane, sandblasting, sandblasting/silane, silica coating and silica coating/silane). Each main group was divided according to the universal adhesive application mode (either the etch-and-rinse mode or the self-etch mode). Each slice received 6 resin composite micro-cylinders (0.8 × 1 mm). Micro-shear bond strength was run at 0.5 mm/min crosshead speed until failure. Treated surfaces were examined using SEM. Bond strength data were statistically analyzed using Two-Way ANOVA/Tukey HSD post hoc test. Only ‘surface treatment’ significantly affected the repair μSBS (p ? 0.001). Parameters ‘Adhesive application mode’ and ‘surface treatment × adhesive mode’ showed no significant effect on μSBS (p = 0.458 and p = 0.286 respectively). Regardless of the adhesive application mode, silica coating showed the highest μSBS (21.6 ± 6.8 MPa), while sandblasting/silane showed the lowest μSBS (13.0 ± 6.1 MPa). Regardless of adhesive application mode, the use of silica coating to treat the water-stored CAD/CAM resin composite surfaces is crucial to improve the repair bond strength.     

The Effect of Decalcified Root Surfaces on Dentinal Bond Strength

Microtensile bond strengths of current dentin adhesives to intact and decalcified root surfaces were evaluated. Two hundred and twenty-four extracted human incisors were divided into two groups as intact (IRD) and decalcified (DRD). The roots of DRD teeth were placed in a demineralization solution to produce artificial carious-like lesions. Root surfaces were slightly ground and treated with either Scotchbond Multi-Purpose (SMP), Adper Single Bond Plus (SBP), Adper Easy Bond (AEB), Scotchbond SE (SSE), Clearfil SE Bond (CSE), Clearfil Protect Bond (CPB), Clearfil Tri-S Bond (CTS), FL-Bond II (FLB), XP Bond (XPB), iBond (IB), AdheSE Bond (ASE), Optibond Solo Plus (OSP), Prelude Dental Adhesive (PDA), and G-Bond (GB). Composite build-ups were formed on the bonded surfaces. After thermocycling, hour-glass shaped specimens with an area of 1 mm² at the bonded interface were subjected to microtensile testing. Resin–dentin interfaces were observed with SEM. Kruskal Wallis and Mann Whitney-U tests were used for statistical analysis. There was not significant difference between bond strengths to intact and decalcified dentin, with the exception of ASE and CSE, which had higher values to IRD (p < 0.05). SSE and CTS were the adhesives that showed higher bond strengths to DRD than to IRD, however the difference was not significant (p > 0.05). The self-etch adhesives performed better on both IRD and DRD surfaces than etch-and-rinse systems.