Postural, epidemiological and biomechanical analysis of luggage handling in an aircraft luggage compartment

Loading and unloading of luggage in an aircraft luggage compartment is carried out manually in uncomfortable working position. In this study, the loading work was analysed by surveying musculoskeletal symptoms, by recording the working postures and techniques at work, and by simulating the loading work in a mock-up of a DC-9 aircraft compartment. Low back, knees and shoulders were exposed to mechanical load in luggage handling. Video recordings were used to analyse posture and work technique. In the simulated luggage compartment in the laboratory, ground reaction forces, intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) and electromyography (EMG) signals from back and shoulder muscles were recorded simultaneously. Loading in sitting, squatting and kneeling were the postures that were used the most often. Unloading was generally less stressful than loading, involving less static work. Handling time was shortest when kneeling but knee symptoms were dominant. Lateral ground reaction forces and EMG activity from trapezius were highest when sitting, and IAP peaks were greatest when squatting. Thus each posture had major, though differing, disadvantages and a radical redesign of the DC-9 luggage compartment was clearly indicated.     

The effects of knee angles on subjective discomfort ratings, heart rates, and muscle fatigue of lower extremities in static-sustaining tasks

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of knee-flexion angles on subjective discomfort ratings, heart rates, and muscle fatigue using median frequency (MDF) in a static-sustaining task. Thirty healthy participants maintained 13 postures including standing, squatting, sitting, and kneeling postures and then MDFs from the erector spinae, biceps femoris, vastus medialis, gastrocnemius, and tibialis anterior muscles, subjective discomfort, and heart rates were collected every 3 min during a sustained 15 min task. Results showed that the discomfort, heart rate and muscle fatigue were significantly influenced by the body postures. In general, standing and sitting postures showed less discomfort as well as lower heart rates, whereas squatting postures (KF120, KF90, KF60) had higher discomfort and heart rates. Three MDF change trends were reported associated with postures in this study. First, there were less changes of MDFs for standing and sitting postures; second, all patterns of MDFs for KF 150 and KF120 decreased, and lastly some MDFs had increasing trends and others showed decreasing trends for KF30, KF30T, and kneeling postures.     

The effects of knee angles on subjective discomfort ratings,heart rates,and muscle fatigue of lower extremities in static-sustaining tasks

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of knee-flexion angles on subjective discomfort ratings, heart rates, and muscle fatigue using median frequency (MDF) in a static-sustaining task. Thirty healthy participants maintained 13 postures including standing, squatting, sitting, and kneeling postures and then MDFs from the erector spinae, biceps femoris, vastus medialis, gastrocnemius, and tibialis anterior muscles, subjective discomfort, and heart rates were collected every 3 min during a sustained 15 min task. Results showed that the discomfort, heart rate and muscle fatigue were significantly influenced by the body postures. In general, standing and sitting postures showed less discomfort as well as lower heart rates, whereas squatting postures (KF120, KF90, KF60) had higher discomfort and heart rates. Three MDF change trends were reported associated with postures in this study. First, there were less changes of MDFs for standing and sitting postures; second, all patterns of MDFs for KF 150 and KF120 decreased, and lastly some MDFs had increasing trends and others showed decreasing trends for KF30, KF30T, and kneeling postures.     

Task-specific postures in low-seam underground coal mining

The objective of this study was to determine low-seam mine worker exposure to various postures as they pertain to job classifications and job tasks. Sixty-four mine workers from four low-seam coal mines participated. The mine workers reported the tasks they were required to complete and the two postures they used most frequently to perform them. They were provided with a schematic of postures from which to select. The two postures reported most frequently were identified for each task along with the job classification of the workers performing the tasks. Of the 18 tasks reported, over two thirds were performed by at least two different job classifications and over one third were performed by four or more job classifications. Across tasks, the postures used appeared to vary greatly. However, when grouped by job classification, the most frequently reported posture across all job classifications was kneeling near full flexion. Operating the continuous miner was associated with frequent squatting and was likely used because it affords great mobility, allowing operators to move quickly to avoid hazards. However, for environments with a restricted vertical height such as low-seam mining, the authors recommend squatting be avoided as data demonstrates that large amounts of femoral rollback and high muscle activity for the extensors when performing lateral lifts in this posture. Kneeling near full flexion was reported as the most frequently used posture by all job classifications and was likely due to the fact that it requires the least amount of muscle activity to maintain and has reduced pressures at the knee. However, the authors recommend this posture be avoided when performing lateral lifting tasks. Like squatting, kneeling near full flexion results in increased femoral rollback and may increase the stresses applied to the meniscus. Unlike lateral lifting, maintaining a static posture results in knee loading and muscle activity such that the mine worker should consider kneeling near full flexion and sitting on their heels. Although kneeling near full flexion is associated with injuries, there are benefits to this posture that are realized when statically kneeling (minimal muscle activity, allows worker to maintain an upright torso in low heights, and decreased loading at the knee). However, cartilage is avascular and nourished by synovial fluid. Therefore, one should frequently rotate between postures, assuming a more upright kneeling posture when possible and frequently fully flexing and extending the knee allowing nutrients to the cartilage.Relevance to industryIn 2009, over one fourth of underground coal mines that produced coal in the United States were considered low seam with an average working height of <109.2 cm (MSHA, 2009) restricting workers to their knees. Data exists regarding the biomechanical implications of kneeling postures and demonstrates the possibility of detrimental consequences to varying degrees for each posture. With each posture posing a different level of exposure to musculoskeletal disorder risk factors, it is essential to determine the postures mine workers use to perform their job tasks and how their postural options are restricted by the low-seam underground mining environment.     

Effects of common working postures on balance control during the stabilisation phase of transitioning to standing

Standing after maintaining working postures may result in imbalance and could elicit a fall. The objective of this study was to assess the magnitude of this imbalance. Forty-five male participants completed three replications of conditions created by four static postures and three durations within posture. Participants transitioned to quiet standing at a self-selected pace. Body segment location and displacement of the centre of pressure (COP) were recorded using a motion capture system and two forceplates, respectively. Balance control measures were calculated during the stabilisation phase. All balance control measures were significantly affected by static posture but not duration within posture. Bending over at waist generally caused the smallest changes in balance control measures, whereas the reclined kneeling posture resulted in the largest. Findings may lead to recommendations for redesign of tasks to reduce the use of certain working postures, particularly in high-risk environments such as construction. STATEMENT OF RELEVANCE: Task performance on the jobsite often requires individuals to maintain non-erect postures. This study suggests that the working posture chosen affects stabilisation during a transition to a standing position. Bending at the waist or squatting seems to have less of an affect on balance control measures, whereas both types of kneeling postures evaluated resulted in greater imbalance.     

Lifting in four restricted lifting conditions: psychophysical, physiological and biomechanical effects of lifting in stooped and kneeling postures

Many underground coal mines are less than 1.2 m in height, and require that manual lifting tasks be performed in restricted postures (usually stooped or kneeling). Unfortunately, little is known about how these postures affect the underground coal miner's capabilities to perform such work. A previous Bureau of Mines study indicated that lifting capacity is greater when stooped than kneeling when lifting under a 1.2 m roof height (Gallagher et al, 1988). However, many low-seam coal mines present even more restricted headroom than 1.2 m. Therefore, a study was conducted to: (1) examine the psychophysical lifting capacity of low-seam coal miners under four restricted lifting conditions, (2) investigate the associated metabolic costs, and (3) analyse the electromyography (EMG) of trunk muscles when lifting in these restricted positions. Subjects were 12 coal miners accustomed to handling materials in restricted postures (mean age = 35.9 yrs +/- 6.4 SD). Results of this study indicated that lifting capacity was greater when the subjects could assume a stooped posture than when kneeling (p < 0.01). Furthermore, the metabolic cost was greater in the kneeling posture for heart rate (p < 0.001), oxygen consumption (p < 0.001), minute ventilation (p < 0.05] ), and respiratory exchange ratio (p < 0.05), despite the fact that miners lifted less weight in this posture. Analysis of the EMG data indicated increased activity of the electores spinae when kneeling (p < 0.001), but higher latissimus dorsi activity when stopped (p < 0.001). The findings of this study indicate that the weight of supply items should be reduced approximately 14-18% when the kneeling posture must be used for lifting.     

Body movements and muscle activity in sitting cross-legged

Abstract

Assuming the cross-legged (SCL) sitting posture on the ground is possible in two different ways. One which is being termed ‘normal’ does not have an intermediate squatting position, while the other has. In the normal mode, four phases may be discerned, although the transition of postures are smooth. By means of cinematographic observation, the position of the body segments during different instants of the SCL movement and the squatting cycle have been obtained. Electromyographic study shows that the muscles exert greater force during the squatting-arising cycle than during the normal SCL rising cycle. Also, based on heart rate data, the energy expenditure in the squatting mode of SCL appears to be higher than in the normal mode of SCL.     

Evaluation of proper height for squatting stool

Many jobs and activities in people's daily lives have them in squatting postures. Jobs such as housekeeping, farming and welding require various squatting activities. It is speculated that prolonged squatting without any type of supporting stool would gradually and eventually impose musculoskeletal injuries on workers. This study aims to examine the proper height of the stool according to the position of working materials for the squatting worker. A total of 40 male and female college students and 10 female farmers participated in the experiment to find the proper stool height. Student participants were asked to sit and work in three different positions: floor level of 50 mm; ankle level of 200 mm; and knee level of 400 mm. They were then provided with stools of various heights and asked to maintain a squatting work posture. For each working position, they were asked to write down their thoughts on a preferred stool height. A Likert summated rating method as well as pairwise ranking test was applied to evaluate user preference for provided stools under conditions of different working positions. Under a similar experimental procedure, female farmers were asked to indicate their body part discomfort (BPD) on a body chart before and after performing the work. Statistical analysis showed that comparable results were found from both evaluation measures. When working position is below 50 mm, the proper stool height is 100 or should not be higher than 150 mm. When working position is 200 mm, the proper stool height is 150 mm. When working position is 400 mm, the proper stool height is 200 mm. Thus, it is strongly recommended to use proper height of stools with corresponding working position. Moreover, a wearable chair prototype was designed so that workers in a squatting posture do not have to carry and move the stool from one place to another. This stool should ultimately help to relieve physical stress and hence promote the health of squatting workers. This study sought to evaluate and make suggestions on user preference and BPD of proper stool height, at which work can be done comfortably, according to squatting work position. In short, results showed that proper stool height differed according to working position, even with similar squatting tasks.     

Evaluation of proper height for squatting stool

Many jobs and activities in people's daily lives have them in squatting postures. Jobs such as housekeeping, farming and welding require various squatting activities. It is speculated that prolonged squatting without any type of supporting stool would gradually and eventually impose musculoskeletal injuries on workers. This study aims to examine the proper height of the stool according to the position of working materials for the squatting worker. A total of 40 male and female college students and 10 female farmers participated in the experiment to find the proper stool height. Student participants were asked to sit and work in three different positions: floor level of 50 mm; ankle level of 200 mm; and knee level of 400 mm. They were then provided with stools of various heights and asked to maintain a squatting work posture. For each working position, they were asked to write down their thoughts on a preferred stool height. A Likert summated rating method as well as pairwise ranking test was applied to evaluate user preference for provided stools under conditions of different working positions. Under a similar experimental procedure, female farmers were asked to indicate their body part discomfort (BPD) on a body chart before and after performing the work. Statistical analysis showed that comparable results were found from both evaluation measures. When working position is below 50 mm, the proper stool height is 100 or should not be higher than 150 mm. When working position is 200 mm, the proper stool height is 150 mm. When working position is 400 mm, the proper stool height is 200 mm. Thus, it is strongly recommended to use proper height of stools with corresponding working position. Moreover, a wearable chair prototype was designed so that workers in a squatting posture do not have to carry and move the stool from one place to another. This stool should ultimately help to relieve physical stress and hence promote the health of squatting workers. This study sought to evaluate and make suggestions on user preference and BPD of proper stool height, at which work can be done comfortably, according to squatting work position. In short, results showed that proper stool height differed according to working position, even with similar squatting tasks.     

Where Does the Mouse Go? An Investigation into the Placement of a Body-Attached TouchPad Mouse for Wearable Computers

We investigated the effects of placement of a TouchPad input device on a user's body for the control of a wearable computer. This study involved 25 subjects performing selection tasks with a TouchPad mouse while wearing a wearable computer on their back and using a head-mounted display. Each subject performed the tasks in 27 different combinations of four postures (sitting, kneeling, standing and prone) and seven different placements of the TouchPad mouse on the subject's body (forearm, thigh by 2, torso by 2, and upper arm by 2). We measured the time and error rate to complete the selection of a circular target. The results for the effects due to posture showed that there were similar time effects for sitting, standing and kneeling. When examining the effects resulting from mouse position, the front of the thigh was shown to be the best position of the mouse. When the posturing and mouse position conditions were combined, the results indicated that the thigh front mouse position would be most appropriate for sitting, kneeling and standing postures, and the forearm mouse position would be best for the prone position.     

Direct measurements and systematic observations of physical workload among medical secretaries, furniture removers and male and female reference populations

The aim of this investigation was to collect quantitative information about the occurrence of manual materials handling and working postures in working life. Direct technical recordings and systematic observations by trained ergonomists were used throughout a whole working day on 12 male furniture removers, 13 female medical secretaries, 27 males and 45 females randomly sampled from the working population in the Stockholm area. A quantitative job exposure profile was obtained by weighting together exposure data obtained by observation of tasks occurring during a normal working week. The results showed no major differences in physical exposures between the male and female reference populations. The medical secretaries spent less time than the female population kneeling/squatting and longer time than any other group with repetitive hand movements. Exposure data for task and job should be clearly distinguished.     

Electromyography of the thigh muscles during lifting tasks in kneeling and squatting postures

Underground coal miners who work in low-seam mines frequently handle materials in kneeling or squatting postures. To assess quadriceps and hamstring muscle demands in these postures, nine participants performed lateral load transfers in kneeling and squatting postures, during which electromyographic (EMG) data were collected. EMG activity was obtained at five points throughout the transfer for three quadriceps muscles and two hamstring muscles from each thigh. ANOVA results indicated that EMG data for nine of 10 thigh muscles were affected by an interaction between posture and angular position of the load lifted (p < 0.001). Muscles of the right thigh were most active during the lifting portion of the task (lifting a block from the participant's right) and activity decreased as the block was transferred to the left. Left thigh muscles showed the opposite pattern. EMG activity for the majority of thigh muscles was affected by the size of the base of support provided by different postures, with lower EMG activity observed with a larger base of support and increased activity in postures where base of support was reduced (p < 0.05). Thigh EMG activity was lowest in postures with fully flexed knees, which may explain worker preference for this posture. However, such postures are also associated with increased risk of meniscal damage. STATEMENT OF RELEVANCE: Kneeling and squatting postures are sometimes used for manual lifting activities, but are associated with increased knee injury risk. This paper examines the EMG responses of knee extensors/flexors to lifting in these postures, discusses the impact of posture and kneepads on muscle recruitment and explores the implications for work in such postures.     

Stabilisation times after transitions to standing from different working postures

Transitioning to standing after maintaining working postures may result in imbalance and could elicit a fall. The objective of this study was to quantify the magnitude of imbalance using a stabilisation time metric. Forty-five male participants completed three replications of conditions created by one of four working postures (bent at waist, squat, forward kneel, reclined kneel) and three durations within posture. Participants transitioned to quiet standing at a self-selected pace. Stabilisation time, based on changes in centre of pressure velocity, was used to indicate the initiation of steady state while standing. Stabilisation time was significantly affected by static postures but not duration within posture. The largest stabilisation times resulted from transitions initiated from a bent at waist posture. The smallest were associated with the kneeling postures, which were not significantly different from each other. Findings may lead to recommendations for redesign of tasks, particularly in high-risk environments such as construction.

Statement of Relevance: Task performance on the jobsite often requires individuals to maintain non-erect postures. This study suggests that working posture affects stabilisation during transition to a standing position. Bending at the waist and squatting resulted in longer stabilisation times, whereas both kneeling postures evaluated resulted in greater imbalance but for a shorter duration.     

EMG analysis of sitting work postures in women

Based on EMG analysis on six middle-aged women, seven sitting work postures were compared with reference to relaxed standing position. The muscles included in the investigation are pectoralis major, levator scapulae, deltoideus, latissimus dorsi, upper fibres of the trapezius, erector spinae, vastus medialis and lateralis, rectus femoris and gastrocnemius muscles. The commoner sitting postures examined were sitting on the floor with crossed legs, sitting on the floor with right leg bent at the knee, sitting on the floor with left leg bent at the knee, squatting with both legs bent at the knee without any back support, sitting on a plank of 10 cm height with both legs bent at the knee, sitting on the floor with legs extended, and sitting upright on a stool of 40 cm height. The relative load on the muscles was highest in the case of sitting on the floor with the right leg bent at the knee. However, less muscle activity was noted when sitting on the floor with the legs extended, a posture commonly adopted by women performing various domestic and other activities.     

The work load of warehouse workers in three different working systems

An investigation was conducted in five companies in the distribution branch. These companies were divided into three different working systems, i.e., highly mechanized (HM), moderately mechanized (MM), and slightly mechanized (SM). The three systems differed in logistics and kind of appliances used. The purpose of this study was to compare the three working systems with different degrees of mechanization concerning the time spent on tasks, activities during the working day, postures that occurred, physiological work load, perceived exertion and recovery from work. To investigate the different tasks, activities and working postures, 50 warehouse workers, originating from the three working systems, were observed by means of a direct observation method, called: ‘TRAC’. To investigate the physiological work load the heart rate was recorded continuously during the working day and related to the individually determined relation between heart rate and oxygen uptake. This relation was constructed with the results of a cycle ergometer test done in the laboratory. During lunch and at the end of the working day the warehouse workers filled in a questionnaire concerning their perceived exertion and recovery from work.

In the slightly mechanized system more time was spent with the trunk flexed more than 75° as compared with the other two systems. This posture was very common during lifting of objects, and lifting was done more often in this system than in the other systems. In the MM system the warehouse workers had the highest estimated oxygen uptake and reported the highest perceived exertion at the end of the working day. The workers in the HM system had a shorter working day and had less problems with recovery from work than the workers of the other two systems. Poor working postures like rotation and lateroflexion were commonly found in the HM working system. An important explanation was the difference in time spent driving an electric car. This activity was done mostly in the HM system. In conclusion, the HM system was considered most favourable when it concerned work load and recovery from work. The appliances used in the HM system, and especially the electric car, need to be designed according to ergonomic guidelines to avoid poor working postures.     

An analysis of scanning postures among grocery cashiers and its relationship to checkstand design

Mounting evidence suggests that musculoskeletal disorders are prevalent among US retail food workers. Cashiers who use electronic scanners appear to be at especially high risk for upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders. Checkstand design has been implicated as a contributor to musculoskeletal injury among cashiers because workstation design can significantly impact working posture. The present study examines working posture among two groups of cashiers to determine if checkstand design is associated with substantial differences in posture and movement during scanning. The work activities of twenty grocery cashiers using one of two checkstand designs (front-facing and right-hand takeaway) were examined. Videotapes of cashiers performing scanning tasks were observed and associated postures and movements were visually coded. The right-hand takeaway design was associated with a significantly higher percentage of non-neutral trunk postures than the front-facing design. However, there were no significant differences in shoulder posture, grasp, or scanning motion associated with checkstand/scanner design. Factors that appeared to affect cashier work posture during scanning included stature, order size, and product type. Although improving the checkstand design may reduce the occurrence of certain awkward postures and static muscle loading conditions among cashiers, the success of these interventions is likely to be limited unless follow-up programmes are instituted to ensure that cashiers are able to use these designs effectively. Furthermore, fundamental changes in cashier work may be required to fully eliminate hazards for musculoskeletal disorders from this job.     

The seated man (Homo Sedens) the seated work position. Theory and practice

Modern furniture in schools, factories and offices is constructed in such a way that no one can use it properly. Each day people sit for many hours hunched over their tables in postures extremely harmful to the back. No one should be surprised that more than half of the population today is complaining of backache. In no other field of human activity is a similar gap between theory and reality found. A closer study of 'normal' sitting postures will explain why nobody is able to sit in the 'ideal' position. First of all, the eye in this position is at a distance of 50-60 cm from the book or working material and the axis of vision is horizontal. In addition, this posture requires at least 90 degrees flexion of the hip joint, yet the normal human being can only bend 60 degrees . A considerably better sitting posture can be obtained if the table is tilted about 10 degrees . In this way the book is brought closer and at a better angle to the eye. The worst bending of the neck is thus avoided. Furthermore, the seat can, with advantage, be tilted 20 degrees forward to reduce the flexion of the lumbar region. By both these means the extra 30 degrees flexion, which is the most strenuous part of flexion, is avoided.     

Effects on the Trunk of Erecting Pit Props at Different Working Heights

The effects on lumbar movement and intra-abdominal pressure of erection of hydraulic props by three methods at different working heights have been studied. Lifting in a squatting position and when on one knee was accompanied by greater trunk stress than when kneeling on both knees. At 3 ft 6 in. (107 cm) working height the magnitudes of lumbar movements and abdominal pressure increases were much less than those at 4 ft 6 in. (137 cm), a difference greater than could be explained by consideration of external work done. The results indicate that the optimum method of prop erection has yet to be evolved, and show that prop erection at 4 ft 6 in. (137 cm) working height by some methods may be unduly hazardous.     

Comparison of stoop versus prone postures for a simulated agricultural harvesting task

Physical and psychophysical differences between working in the stooped and prone postures were compared while performing a simulated agricultural harvesting task for 30 min. Fifteen male subjects participated. The measures used to compare the two postures included perceived discomfort, electromyography (EMG), and heart rate (HR). Average hamstrings localized discomfort (0-10 scale) was 6.17 (SD=2.9) for the stoop posture and 0.67 (SD=1.29) for the prone posture. Erector spinae and hamstring EMG RMS increased 68% and 18%, respectively, while mean power frequency for the hamstrings decreased 13% for the stoop task. Mean power frequency for the middle trapezius muscle decreased in both postures (stoop 4.13%, prone 3.79%). Average heart rate during the last work cycle was 35% greater than the resting heart rate for the stoop posture while average heart rate was 17% greater for the prone posture. Subjects worked on the prone workstation without rest during the 15 min work simulations with less discomfort, no localized fatigue in the back or leg muscles tested, and lower working heart rates than subjects working in the stoop posture.     

Low back joint loading and kinematics during standing and unsupported sitting

The aim was to examine lumbar spine kinematics, spinal joint loads and trunk muscle activation patterns during a prolonged (2 h) period of sitting. This information is necessary to assist the ergonomist in designing work where posture variation is possible -- particularly between standing and various styles of sitting. Joint loads were predicted with a highly detailed anatomical biomechanical model (that incorporated 104 muscles, passive ligaments and intervertebral discs), which utilized biological signals of spine posture and muscle electromyograms (EMG) from each trial of each subject. Sitting resulted in significantly higher (p<0.001) low back compressive loads (mean +/- SD 1698 +/- 467 N) than those experienced by the lumbar spine during standing (1076 +/- 243 N). Subjects were equally divided into adopting one of two sitting strategies: a single 'static' or a 'dynamic' multiple posture approach. Within each individual, standing produced a distinctly different spine posture compared with sitting, and standing spine postures did not overlap with flexion postures adopted in sitting when spine postures were averaged across all eight subjects. A rest component (as noted in an amplitude probability distribution function from the EMG) was present for all muscles monitored in both sitting and standing tasks. The upper and lower erector spinae muscle groups exhibited a shifting to higher levels of activation during sitting. There were no clear muscle activation level differences in the individuals who adopted different sitting strategies. Standing appears to be a good rest from sitting given the reduction in passive tissue forces. However, the constant loading with little dynamic movement which characterizes both standing and sitting would provide little rest/change for muscular activation levels or low back loading.