Human strength capabilities during one-handed maximum voluntary exertions in the fore and aft plane

Maximal static strengths were determined for one-handed exertions in all directions in the fore and aft plane. Data from 12 males and 10 females (mean age 30.7 yrs, standard deviation (SD) = 8.9 yrs, n = 22) were obtained with handle heights of 1.0 and 1.75 m. Twelve of the subjects also performed two-handed exertions at the same handle heights. The ratio of mean strengths of females to that of males ranged from 0.50 to 0.83 (for absolute forces) and from 0.63 to 1.00 for forces normalized to body weight. The ratios of one-handed to two-handed strengths ranged from 0.64 to 1.04. Two-handed strengths commonly exceeded one-handed strengths at the lower handle height, but showed fewer significant strength differences (p less than 0.05) according to direction at 1.75 m. Both female/male and one-handed/two-handed strength ratios were found to be dependent on direction of exertion and handle height. The observed strength dependencies upon number of hands (one or two-handed), direction of exertion, handle height and sex are discussed. The strength data have implications for use in biomechanical models and task analysis.     

The measurement and prediction of isometric lifting strength in symmetrical and asymmetrical postures.

Static lifting strengths of nine men and nine women were measured at six heights from just above the floor to just above the head, at two horizontal reaches from the mid-ankles (equal to the elbow to grip and acromium to grip distances), in the sagittal plane and also at 45 degrees and 90 degrees to the right for two-handed exertions and at 45 degrees and 90 degrees to each side for one-handed exertions, making a total of 96 postures. A second and different group of 18 subjects (nine men and nine women) were studied in 20 two-handed and 40 one-handed postures intermediate to those of the first group. A third group of 16 subjects (eight men and eight women), with six drawn from the other groups, were used to determine maximum possible reach (at which lifting strength is zero) at the same heights and planes as those for the first group. When strength was expressed as a fraction of body weight and height and reach were expressed as fractions of stature, predictive equations of static lifting strength were obtained which were gender free. The predictive equations may be used to generate isodyne contours for an individual in any chosen planes. Individuals exist whose strengths are consistently greater or less than the prediction. The possibility of identifying such persons in a process of worker selection is discussed.     

One-handed dynamic pulling strength with special reference to speed, handle height and angles of pulling

A laboratory study was conducted to determine the effects of pulling speed, handle height and angle of pull from the horizontal plane on one-handed dynamic pulling strength. The dynamic strength of nineteen male subjects for a 1 m pull was measured at four different handle heights (40%, 50%, 60% and 70% of shoulder height), at three different angles above the horizontal plane (15°, 25° and 35°), and at three different speeds of pulling (mean speed = 0.7, 1 and 1.1 ms⁻¹). In addition, ratings of perceived exertion were recorded for elbow, shoulder and back. Also, the subjects were required to rate the overall comfort for the pull.

Pulling speed, handle height and angle all had a significant effect on both mean and peak dynamic pulling strengths (p 0.01). Among the three variables, pulling speed was found to be the most critical. The mean dynamic strength was 360, 250 and 180 N and the peak strength was 600, 425 and 320 N at 0.7, 1 and 1.1 ms⁻¹, respectively. The strengths decreased with an increase in handle height from 100% at 40% shoulder height to 83% at 70% of shoulder height and were the highest at an angle of 25° from the horizontal plane.

The ratings of perceived exertion for all three body parts decreased with an increase in speed of pulling (p 0.01). The high speed pulls were perceived as being more comfortable than low speed pulls (p 0.01). The handles at 50% and 60% of shoulder height and at an angle of 25° were perceived as being more comfortable than those at other heights and angles (p 0.01).

It is suggested that biomechanical stresses need to be considered along with physical strength and ratings of perceived exertion and comfort to determine optimum speed, height and angle of pulling for high speed pulling tasks.     

One-handed dynamic pulling strength with special application to lawn mowers

A laboratory study was conducted to determine one-handed dynamic and static pulling strengths of 50 males and 49 females from 14 to 71 years of age. The dynamic strength for a 11m pull was measured to simulate the act of starting a lawn mower engine for four different starting-rope handle locations: on the engine, in the middle, on the right and on the left side of the frame. The last three were located at the back of the lawn mower at a vertical height of 63 cm from the floor and the handle on the engine was located at 42 cm. Static strength was measured for the handle in the middle. Ratings of perceived exertion were recorded for different body parts.

Peak and average dynamic pulling strengths were 55% and 34% of static pulling strengths. Dynamic pulling strengths were highly correlated with peak velocity (r = 0·84). Men in the age group 21-34 years had the highest strength and women in the age group 51-71 years the least strength. Dynamic pulling strengths for women were 62% of strengths for men. Women took 10% longer to pull, had a lower peak velocity (16%), reached peak force faster (17%) and took a longer time (6%) to reach peak velocity than men.

The starting handle located on the engine resulted in the maximum pulling strength and on the left side in the minimum strength. However, two out of three subjects preferred the handle either on the right side or in the middle. Fifty-five percent of the subjects indicated they would prefer a height higher than 63 cm.

Maximum stresses were perceived on the shoulder and upper arm with a mean rating between fairly light and somewhat hard. Graphs of cumulative frequency distributions of average and peak dynamic pulling strengths are presented to aid in the determining forces required to start a lawn mower engine in order to satisfy a desired percentage of the population.     

Force direction and physical load in dynamic pushing and pulling

In pushing and pulling wheeled carts, the direction of force exertion may, beside the force magnitude, considerably affect musculoskeletal loading. This paper describes how force direction changes as handle height and force level change, and the effects this has on the loads on the shoulder and low back. Eight subjects pushed against or pulled on a stationary bar or movable cart at various handle heights and horizontal force levels while walking on a treadmill. The forces at the hands in the vertical and horizontal direction were measured by a forcetransducer. The forces, body movements and anthropometric data were used to calculate the net joint torques in the sagittal plane in the shoulder and the lumbosacral joint. The magnitudes and directions of forces did not differ between the cart and the bar pushing and pulling. Force direction was affected by the horizontal force level and handle height. As handle height and horizontal force level increased, the pushing force direction changed from 45° (SD 3.3°) downward to near horizontal, while the pulling force direction changed from pulling upward by 14° (SD 15.3°) to near horizontal. As a result, it was found that across conditions the changes in force exertion were frequently reflected in changes in shoulder torque and low back torque although of a much smaller magnitude. Therefore, an accurate evaluation of musculoskeletal loads in pushing and pulling requires, besides a knowledge of the force magnitude, knowledge of the direction of force exertion with respect to the body.     

Force direction and physical load in dynamic pushing and pulling

In pushing and pulling wheeled carts, the direction of force exertion may, beside the force magnitude, considerably affect musculoskeletal loading. This paper describes how force direction changes as handle height and force level change, and the effects this has on the loads on the shoulder and low back. Eight subjects pushed against or pulled on a stationary bar or movable cart at various handle heights and horizontal force levels while walking on a treadmill. The forces at the hands in the vertical and horizontal direction were measured by a force-transducer. The forces, body movements and anthropometric data were used to calculate the net joint torques in the sagittal plane in the shoulder and the lumbosacral joint. The magnitudes and directions of forces did not differ between the cart and the bar pushing and pulling. Force direction was affected by the horizontal force level and handle height. As handle height and horizontal force level increased, the pushing force direction changed from 45 degrees (SD 3.3 degrees) downward to near horizontal, while the pulling force direction changed from pulling upward by 14 degrees (SD 15.3 degrees) to near horizontal. As a result, it was found that across conditions the changes in force exertion were frequently reflected in changes in shoulder torque and low back torque although of a much smaller magnitude. Therefore, an accurate evaluation of musculoskeletal loads in pushing and pulling requires, besides a knowledge of the force magnitude, knowledge of the direction of force exertion with respect to the body.     

The effect of handle height and cart load on the initial hand forces in cart pushing and pulling

The objective of this study was to measure the three-dimensional hand forces people exert to initiate a cart push or pull for two cart loads: 73 and 181 kg, and three handle heights: knuckle, elbow, and shoulder heights. The cart used was equipped with 15.24 cm (6 in) diameter wheels. The floor was covered with carpet tiles. The laboratory-measured hand force exertions were compared to the minimum forces needed to push/pull the cart under the same conditions and to the psychophysical initial push/pull force limits. For pushing and pulling, the measured anterior-posterior hand forces were 2–2.4 times the minimum required forces. For the heavier cart load, lower forces were applied as handle height increased. Pull forces were 7% higher than push forces. The smallest vertical forces were measured at elbow height. Strength capability and gender did not have an effect on the applied forces. The mean strength percentile for the male sample was 64%, while the mean strength percentile for the female sample was 13% as determined from the Adjusted Torso Lift Strength Test and population strength data for this test. The comparison with the psychophysical limits indicated that the tasks were well within the maximum acceptable initial forces for males, but not for females.     

The evaluation of force exertions and muscle activities when operating a manual guided vehicle

A manual guided vehicle (MGV) is used to handle heavy materials in thin film transistor-liquid crystal display (TFT-LCD) manufacturing clean rooms. This study focuses on evaluating the force exertions and muscle activities in MGV operations. The independent variables include gender, force direction, handle height, load handled and wheel diameter of the MGV. The results show the force direction, handle height and load handling effects are significant in most measures except for F_ending (the peak force required to stop the MGV) and the EMG of the anterior deltoid. The wheel diameter had a significant effect on F_initial (the peak force required to move the MGV) and F_ending responses. Gender did not significantly effect any measures. Moreover, the pushing and pulling force is less at 115 cm handle height than at 101.5 cm and 88 cm handle heights. Using 15.3 cm (6 inch) diameter wheels requires less force than 20.3 cm (8 inch) diameter wheels because the two front wheels are fixed and the two rear wheels are rotatable. The design implications are discussed.     

Development and application of a multi-axis dynamometer for measuring grip force

Objective: This paper describes the development and application of a novel multi-axis hand dynamometer for quantifying 2D grip force magnitude and direction in the flexion-extension plane of the fingers. Methods: A three-beam reconfigurable form dynamometer, containing two active beams for measuring orthogonal forces and moments regardless of point of force application, was designed, fabricated and tested. Maximum grip exertions were evaluated for 16 subjects gripping cylindrical handles varying in diameter. Results: Mean grip force magnitudes were 231 N (SD = 67.7 N), 236 N (72.9 N), 208 N (72.5 N) and 158 N (45.7 N) for 3.81 cm, 5.08 cm, 6.35 cm and 7.62 cm diameter handles, respectively. Grip force direction rotated clockwise and the centre of pressure moved upward along the handle as handle diameter increased. Conclusions: Given that the multi-axis dynamometer simultaneously measures planar grip force magnitude and direction, and centre of pressure along the handle, this novel sensor design provides more grip force characteristics than current sensor designs that would improve evaluation of grip characteristics and model-driven calculations of musculoskeletal forces from dynamometer data.     

The interacting effects of forearm rotation and exertion direction on male and female wrist strength

The accurate estimation of wrist strength is an important component of ergonomics task evaluation, as a vast majority of occupational tasks involve use of the hands to generate forces and moments. The purpose of this study was to examine the interacting effects of forearm rotation (pronation/supination) and wrist exertion direction on strength at the wrist joint in males and females. A total of 24 male and female participants performed maximum isometric wrist exertions while maintaining a non-deviated wrist posture (no flexion/extension or radial/ulnar deviation) and an open hand. Maximum wrist moments were obtained in combinations of three forearm rotations (90° pronation, neutral, 90° supination) and four exertion directions (flexion, extension, radial and ulnar deviation). A greater effect of forearm rotation was observed for males, as strength in the neutral forearm posture was significantly different than pronated and supinated postures in 5 of 8 comparisons. For females, both wrist flexion and extension strengths were higher in neutral, compared to supinated forearm postures. The findings of this study suggest that wrist strength does depend on forearm rotation, and this interaction between axes needs to be accounted for in future strength capability estimates.Relevance to industryThis study shows that wrist strength estimates, currently used by ergonomics software packages in industry, can be improved to more accurately reflect the actual wrist strength capabilities of workers during hand-intensive tasks.     

Ready steady push--a study of the role of arm posture in manual exertions

This study investigated arm posture and hand forces during bi-manual pushing. Nine male and eight female participants performed isometric exertions at two reach distances (0 and elbow-grip) and six different positions of the hand interface (handle), defined by the plane (longitudinal, lateral, horizontal) and orientation (0 degrees and 45 degrees). Electrogoniometer instruments were used to measure the displacements/postures of the wrist and elbow joints and the forearm, and force measuring strain gauges were used to measure the exerted hand forces (x-, y- and z-components). The results showed that ability to vary arm posture, particularly the forearm, is important during build up of force and that people tend to seek for a balance in the forces applied at the hands by exerting more in the vertical direction. Also, lateral plane handle positions permitted exertion of greater forces than longitudinal and horizontal plane positions.     

Evaluation of a curved handle and handle positions for manual materials handling

Abstract

Previous studies of handles for two-handed box handling have shown that the best angle for a handle on a box varies with height above the floor. In order to minimize the accommodation between handle and wrist required at different heights, a curved handle was proposed. Six manual materials handling workers lifted 9 kg and 13 kg boxes between conveyors at floor and waist heights for three minutes while body angles were analysed from video tape recordings. Two symmetric and two asymmetric handle positions were tested. Both straight and curved handles resulted in excellent hand/handle fit but were not significantly different from each other on any measures.     

Upper body push-pull strength of normal young adults in sagittal plane at three heights

Twenty young adults (ten males − mean age = 21.1 years; ten females − mean age = 21.1 years) were tested for their two-handed push-pull strength in sagittal plane at heights of 35 cm (low), 100 cm (medium) and 150 cm (high) in isometric and isokinetic modes. The lower extremities of the subjects were stabilized in a custom-designed device at hip, knees and ankle. The twelve experimental conditions (2 activities − push and pull × 3 heights × 2 modes) were randomized. The push-pull strengths were measured using a modified Static Dynamic Strength Tester with a SM 500 load cell. The analogue data were sampled and collected at 50 Hz through a Metrabyte DAS 20 in an IBM XT. Males as well as females were strongest in pulling at medium height in isometric mode. The isometric pushing strengths ranged between 41% to 68%, and 27% to 44% for males and females respectively when normalized against mean pulling strength of males at medium height. The isokinetic strengths were invariably significantly lower than isometric strength (p < 0.01).     

Pushing strengths under restricted space

This study investigates human maximum horizontal isometric pushing strength and rearward foot position while pushing at four different exertion heights (48 cm, 84 cm, 120 cm, and 156 cm) and two exertion spaces (unrestricted and restricted). The restricted space was reduced to an anterior–posterior direction. The results showed that participants' most efficient exertion height and rearward foot position occurred invariably at an exertion height of 84 cm when pushing in an unrestricted exertion space. Restricted space impaired the pushing strength, with a maximal difference of pushing strength between unrestricted and restricted spaces also occurring at the exertion height of 84 cm. The percentages of female to male pushing strength varied little across the four exertion heights. Participants seemed to be prone to utilize only approximately 71% to 82% of the exertion space available while pushing in a restricted space. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Hum Factors Man 17: 95–102, 2007.     

Shoulder muscle activity in off-axis pushing and pulling tasks

Workspace design can often dictate the muscular efforts required to perform work, impacting injury risk. Within many environments, industrial workers often use sub-maximal forces in offset directions in to accomplish job tasks. The purpose of this research was to develop methods to estimate shoulder muscle activation during seated, static, sub-maximal exertions in off-axis (non-cardinal) directions. Surface EMG signals were recorded from 14 upper extremity muscles in 20 right-handed university aged, right-handed males (age: 22 ± 3 years, weight: 77.5 ± 11.1 kg, height 179.0 ± 7.0 cm) participated in this study. Each participant performed 60 submaximal exertions (40N) directed at 4 off-axis phase angles of 45° (45°, 135°, 225°, and 315°) in 3 planes (frontal, sagittal, and transverse) in 5 hand locations within a right handed reach envelope. The influence of hand location and force direction on muscle activity was evaluated with a forced-entry stepwise regression model. The ability of previously published on-axis prediction equations to predict muscle activity during these off-axis exertions was also evaluated. Within each muscle, activity levels were affected by both hand location and three-dimensional force direction and activation levels ranged from <1 to 37 %MVE. For each force direction there were 75 predictive equations selected and used, and the specific equation that best predicted activation depended on the muscle, exertion direction and hand location evaluated. This work assists ergonomic workplace design to minimize muscle demands during commonly performed off-axis exertions. These estimated demands can be employed to improve workplace design to reduce workplace injuries and enhance worker productivity.     

Static lifting strength in different lifting postures among Malaysian adults

This laboratory‐based study aims to evaluate maximum static lifting strengths for one‐handed (left hand or right hand) and two‐handed exertions in four lifting types (back lifting, upper‐body lifting, arm lifting, and shoulder lifting) across three horizontal distances (toes were anterior to, aligned with, and posterior to the exerted handle). This study recruited 48 men and 48 women, right‐handed undergraduates aged 18 to 25 years. The results showed that the static lifting strength ratio of one‐handed lifting to two‐handed lifting ranged from 61% to 71%. No significant difference (p > 0.05) was observed between right‐handed (dominant) and left‐handed lifting strengths. This study showed a significant difference (p < 0.001) in men's and women's lifting strengths in all lifting conditions. This study also showed a significant difference (p < 0.05) in respondents with normal body mass index (BMI; <25) and abnormal BMI (BMI ≥ 25) in all lifting types. The lifting strengths in four lifting types across three horizontal distances were significantly different. The results showed that upper‐body lifting with near horizontal distance (toes anterior to the exerted handle) has the highest reading of lifting strength. The results encouraged two‐handed lifting due to higher lifting strength and less strain. The results also indicated the need to account for differences between the genders and BMI categories when disseminating lifting tasks. This study recommends that practitioners not overlook the effects of the lifting types and horizontal distances when evaluating one's lifting strength for screening purposes. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Normative data on the one-handed static pull strength of a Chinese population and a comparison with American data

We assess the one-handed static pull strength of a Chinese population and compare it to that of an American sample. Fifty men and 50 women in five age groups were asked to exert their maximum one-handed pull strength in three pulling directions (across, front and side) and from four pulling heights (61 cm, 76 cm, waist height and above-shoulder height). The results showed that women had less pull strength than men under all of the conditions tested. The front and side pulling resulted in the greatest pull strength, with a decrease detected when the pulling height was increased. The American sample exhibited greater strength than the Chinese. Body mass and men’s handgrip force were also associated with the pull strength. These variables should be taken into account in the development of tasks related to one-handed pulling.

Practitioner summary:

In this paper, we report a laboratory-based experiment conducted to assess the one-handed static pull strength of a Chinese population and compare the results with those of an American population. The variables associated with pull strength included gender, pulling direction, pulling height, race, body mass and men’s handgrip force.     

Thumb push forces exertable by free-standing subjects

This study assessed the maximum pushing force that could be exerted by freestanding subjects, using thumbs only, on a small surface located in one of three horizontal positions at nine heights ranging from 13·5 to 169·9 cm above the floor. Each of 102 subjects made nine force exertion trials. Data are given on the cumulative percentages of subjects who could exert various forces at each of the 27 locations. An analysis of variance showed a highly significant effect due to location of the surface and highly significant interactions of location of the surface and trial presentation direction (top-down or bottom-up); of location of the surface and trial presentation pattern; and of location of the surface, trial presentation direction and trial presentation pattern. Maximum forces are exerted at about waist height and are increasingly reduced with increasing distances above and below the optimum location. Right-sided access to pushing surfaces is favoured over left-sided access.     

Maximum isometric lifting strengths of men in teamwork

This study reexamined the additivity of maximum isometric teamwork lifting strength using experienced and height-matched young male participants. The maximum isometric lifting strength was measured for four exertion heights (45, 75, 105, and 140 cm) and four lifting styles (one-, two, three-, and four-person exertions). The results showed that actual teamwork strength could be greater or lower than the sum of individual strengths. If it was greater, the difference between the two could be either significant or nonsignificant, but if it was lower, there was no significant difference between the two. Actual teamwork strength ranged from 90.0% to 134.8% of the sum of individual strengths, indicating that experienced and height-matched participants could overcome the problem of lack of coordination in isometric teamwork lifting. The results also showed that some teamwork members, especially weaker members, might be forced to exert strengths higher than their maximum individual voluntary strengths in teamwork lifting. To avoid such overexertion in teamwork, it is recommended that the weight of the handled load be controlled and lower than the sum of all members' strengths. Additionally, members with significantly different strength abilities should not be assigned to the same team. Actual or potential applications of this research include designing member assignments in teamwork lifting tasks.     

Evaluation of total grip strength and individual finger forces on opposing (A-type) handles among Koreans

The present study evaluated the effect of grip span on finger forces and defined the best grip span for maximising total grip strength based on the finger forces and subjective discomfort in a static exertion. Five grip spans (45, 50, 55, 60 and 65 mm) of the opposing (A-type) handle shape were tested in this study to measure total grip strength and individual finger force among Korean population. A total of 30 males who participated in this study were asked to exert a maximum grip force with two repetitions, and to report the subjective discomfort experienced between exertions using the Borg's CR-10 scale. The highest grip strength was obtained at 45 mm and 50 mm grip spans. Results also showed that forces of all fingers, except for the middle finger force, significantly differed over the grip spans. The lowest subjective discomfort was observed in the 50 mm grip span. The results might be used as development guidelines for ergonomic opposing (A-type) hand tools for Korean population.