A new method for estimating hand internal loads from external force measurements

This study examines using force vectors measured using a directional strain gauge grip dynamometer for estimating finger flexor tendon tension. Fifty-three right-handed participants (25 males and 28 females) grasped varying-sized instrumented cylinders (2.54, 3.81, 5.08, 6.35 and 7.62 cm diameter) using a maximal voluntary power grip. The grip force vector magnitude and direction, referenced to the third metacarpal, was resolved by taking two orthogonal grip force measurements. A simple biomechanical model incorporating the flexor tendons was used to estimate long finger tendon tension during power grip. The flexor digitorum superficialis and the flexor digitorum profundus were assumed to create a moment about the metacarpal phalange (MCP) joint that equals and counteracts a moment around the MCP joint measured externally by the dynamometer. The model revealed that tendon tension increased by 130% from the smallest size handle to the largest, even though grip force magnitude decreased 36% for the same handles. The study demonstrates that grip force vectors may be useful for estimating internal hand forces.     

A new method for estimating hand internal loads from external force measurements

This study examines using force vectors measured using a directional strain gauge grip dynamometer for estimating finger flexor tendon tension. Fifty-three right-handed participants (25 males and 28 females) grasped varying-sized instrumented cylinders (2.54, 3.81, 5.08, 6.35 and 7.62 cm diameter) using a maximal voluntary power grip. The grip force vector magnitude and direction, referenced to the third metacarpal, was resolved by taking two orthogonal grip force measurements. A simple biomechanical model incorporating the flexor tendons was used to estimate long finger tendon tension during power grip. The flexor digitorum superficialis and the flexor digitorum profundus were assumed to create a moment about the metacarpal phalange (MCP) joint that equals and counteracts a moment around the MCP joint measured externally by the dynamometer. The model revealed that tendon tension increased by 130% from the smallest size handle to the largest, even though grip force magnitude decreased 36% for the same handles. The study demonstrates that grip force vectors may be useful for estimating internal hand forces.     

IEA Newsletter

Five grip spans (45 to 65 mm) were tested to evaluate the effects of handle grip span and user's hand size on maximum grip strength, individual finger force and subjective ratings of comfort using a computerised digital dynamometer with independent finger force sensors. Forty-six males participated and were assigned into three hand size groups (small, medium, large) according to their hands' length. In general, results showed the 55- and 50-mm grip spans were rated as the most comfortable sizes and showed the largest grip strength (433.6 N and 430.8 N, respectively), whereas the 65-mm grip span handle was rated as the least comfortable size and the least grip strength. With regard to the interaction effect of grip span and hand size, small and medium-hand participants rated the best preference for the 50- to 55-mm grip spans and the least for the 65-mm grip span, whereas large-hand participants rated the 55- to 60-mm grip spans as the most preferred and the 45-mm grip span as the least preferred. Normalised grip span (NGS) ratios (29% and 27%) are the ratios of user's hand length to handle grip span. The NGS ratios were obtained and applied for suggesting handle grip spans in order to maximise subjective comfort as well as gripping force according to the users' hand sizes. In the analysis of individual finger force, the middle finger force showed the highest contribution (37.5%) to the total finger force, followed by the ring (28.7%), index (20.2%) and little (13.6%) finger. In addition, each finger was observed to have a different optimal grip span for exerting the maximum force, resulting in a bow-contoured shaped handle (the grip span of the handle at the centre is larger than the handle at the end) for two-handle hand tools. Thus, the grip spans for two-handle hand tools may be designed according to the users' hand/finger anthropometrics to maximise subjective ratings and performance based on this study. Results obtained in this study will provide guidelines for hand tool designers and manufacturers for designing grip spans of two-handle tools, which can maximise handle comfort and performance.     

Grip force vectors for varying handle diameters and hand sizes

Grip force was measured along two orthogonal axes and vector summed. Sixty-one participants recruited from a manufacturing facility (29 men and 32 women) grasped instrumented cylinders (2.54, 3.81, 5.08, 6.35, and 7.62 cm diameter) using a maximal voluntary power grip. Two orthogonal force measurements relative to the third metacarpal were resolved into a magnitude and corresponding angle. On average, magnitude increased 34.8 N as handle diameter increased from 2.54 cm to 3.81 cm, and then monotonically declined 103.8 N as the handle diameter increased to 7.62 cm. The average direction monotonically decreased from 59.2 degrees to 37.7 degrees as handle diameter decreased from the largest to the smallest. When the diameter was smallest, the greatest force component, Fx (168.6 N), was in the direction where the fingertips opposed the palm. Conversely, when the diameter was largest, the smallest component, Fx (77.7 N), was in the same direction. These values are averaged for the left and right hand. The angle for the largest diameter increased with increasing hand size. These relationships should be useful for the design of handles that require gripping in specific directions, such as for hand tools and controls. Actual or potential applications of this research include the design of handles that require gripping in specific directions, such as for hand tools and controls, that reduce effort, and that prevent fatigue and overexertion.     

Measurement of coupling forces at the power tool handle-hand interface

This study explored a low-cost system for measurement of coupling forces imposed by the hand on a handle under static and dynamic conditions, and its feasibility for applications to hand-held power tools. The properties of thin-film, flexible and trim-able resistive sensors (FlexiForce) were explored in view of their applicability for measurements of the hand-handle interface forces. The sensors showed very good linearity, while considerable differences were evident in the sensitivity amongst different sensors. The appropriate locations of the sensors on the handle surface were subsequently determined on the basis of the hand-handle geometry and reported force distributions. The validity of the measurement system was investigated for measuring the hand grip and push forces with eight subjects grasping five different stationary instrumented handles (cylindrical: 32, 38 and 43 mm diameter; and elliptical: 32 × 38 and 38 × 44 mm) considering two different positions of the sensors on the handle. The validity of the measurement system was also investigated under vibration for the 38 and 43 mm diameter cylindrical handles. The results showed good linearity and repeatability of the sensors for all subjects and handles under static as well as vibration conditions, while the sensors' outputs differed for each handle. The feasibility of the measurement system was also examined for measurements of hand forces on a power chisel hammer handle. The evaluations were conducted with three subjects grasping the power chisel handle under stationary as well as vibrating conditions, and different combinations of hand grip, push and coupling forces. The measurements revealed very good correlations between the hand forces estimated from the FlexiForce sensors and the reference values for the stationary as well as the vibrating tool.Relevance to industryThe measurement of hand-handle interface forces is vital for assessing the hand-transmitted vibration exposure and musculoskeletal loads. The low cost and flexible sensors, proposed in the study, could be conveniently applied to the curved surfaces of real power tool handles in the field to measure hand grip and push forces, and the forces exerted on the palm and the fingers. The most significant benefits of the sensors lie with its minimal cost and applicability to the real tool handles.     

Measurement of prehensile grasp capabilities by a force and moment wrench: Methodological development and assessment of manual workers

Prehensile grasp capability is typically quantified by pinch and grasp forces. This work was undertaken to develop a methodology to assess complex, multi-axis hand exertions through the measurement of forces and moments exerted by the hand along and about three orthogonal axes originating at the grip centre; termed an external wrench. Instrumentation consisting of a modified pinch/grip dynamometer affixed to a 6?df force cube was developed to simultaneously measure three forces, three moments and the pinch/grip force about the centre of the grip. Twenty right hand dominant manual workers (10 male and 10 female), free of hand or wrist disorders, completed a variety of maximal strength tasks. The randomized block design involved three separate grips?–?power grip, lateral pinch and pulp pinch. Randomized within each block were three non-concurrent repetitions of isolated maximal force and moment generations along and about the three principle orthogonal axes and a maximal grip force exertion. Trials were completed while standing, with the arm abducted and elbow flexed to 90° with a wrist posture near neutral. Where comparable protocols existed in the literature, forces and moments exerted were found to be of similar magnitude to those reported previously. Female and male grip strengths on a Jamar dynamometer were 302.6?N and 450.5?N, respectively. Moment exertions in a power grip (female and male) were 4.7 Nm and 8.1 Nm for pronator, 4.9 Nm and 8.0 Nm for supinator, 6.2 Nm and 10.3 Nm for radial deviator, 7.7 Nm and 13.0 Nm for ulnar deviator, 6.2 Nm and 8.2 Nm for extensor, and 7.1 Nm and 9.3 Nm for flexor moments. Correlations with and between maximal force and moment exertions were only moderate. This paper describes instrumentation that allows comprehensive characterization of prehensile force and moment capability.     

Measurement of prehensile grasp capabilities by a force and moment wrench: methodological development and assessment of manual workers

Prehensile grasp capability is typically quantified by pinch and grasp forces. This work was undertaken to develop a methodology to assess complex, multi-axis hand exertions through the measurement of forces and moments exerted by the hand along and about three orthogonal axes originating at the grip centre; termed an external wrench. Instrumentation consisting of a modified pinch/grip dynamometer affixed to a 6 df force cube was developed to simultaneously measure three forces, three moments and the pinch/grip force about the centre of the grip. Twenty right hand dominant manual workers (10 male and 10 female), free of hand or wrist disorders, completed a variety of maximal strength tasks. The randomized block design involved three separate grips--power grip, lateral pinch and pulp pinch. Randomized within each block were three non-concurrent repetitions of isolated maximal force and moment generations along and about the three principle orthogonal axes and a maximal grip force exertion. Trials were completed while standing, with the arm abducted and elbow flexed to 90 degrees with a wrist posture near neutral. Where comparable protocols existed in the literature, forces and moments exerted were found to be of similar magnitude to those reported previously. Female and male grip strengths on a Jamar dynamometer were 302.6 N and 450.5 N, respectively. Moment exertions in a power grip (female and male) were 4.7 Nm and 8.1 Nm for pronator, 4.9 Nm and 8.0 Nm for supinator, 6.2 Nm and 10.3 Nm for radial deviator, 7.7 Nm and 13.0 Nm for ulnar deviator, 6.2 Nm and 8.2 Nm for extensor, and 7.1 Nm and 9.3 Nm for flexor moments. Correlations with and between maximal force and moment exertions were only moderate. This paper describes instrumentation that allows comprehensive characterization of prehensile force and moment capability.     

Evaluation of total grip strength and individual finger forces on opposing (A-type) handles among Koreans

The present study evaluated the effect of grip span on finger forces and defined the best grip span for maximising total grip strength based on the finger forces and subjective discomfort in a static exertion. Five grip spans (45, 50, 55, 60 and 65 mm) of the opposing (A-type) handle shape were tested in this study to measure total grip strength and individual finger force among Korean population. A total of 30 males who participated in this study were asked to exert a maximum grip force with two repetitions, and to report the subjective discomfort experienced between exertions using the Borg's CR-10 scale. The highest grip strength was obtained at 45 mm and 50 mm grip spans. Results also showed that forces of all fingers, except for the middle finger force, significantly differed over the grip spans. The lowest subjective discomfort was observed in the 50 mm grip span. The results might be used as development guidelines for ergonomic opposing (A-type) hand tools for Korean population.     

Forearm posture and grip effects during push and pull tasks

Direction of loading and performance of multiple tasks have been shown to elevate muscle activity in the upper extremity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of gripping on muscle activity and applied force during pushing and pulling tasks with three forearm postures. Twelve volunteers performed five hand-based tasks in supinated, neutral and pronated forearm postures with the elbow at 90° and upper arm vertical. All tasks were performed with the right (dominant) hand and included hand grip alone, push and pull with and without hand grip. Surface EMG from eight upper extremity muscles, hand grip force, tri-axial push and pull forces and wrist angles were recorded during the 10 s trials. The addition of a pull force to hand grip elevated activity in all forearm muscles (all p < 0.017). During all push with grip tasks, forearm extensor muscle activity tended to increase when compared with grip only while flexor activity tended to decrease. Forearm extensor muscle activity was higher with the forearm pronated compared with neutral and supinated postures during most isolated grip tasks and push or pull with grip tasks (all p < 0.017). When the grip dynamometer was rotated so that the push and pull forces could act to assist in creating grip force, forearm muscle activity generally decreased. These results provide strategies for reducing forearm muscle loading in the workplace.

Statement of Relevance: Tools and tasks designed to take advantage of coupling grip with push or pull actions may be beneficial in reducing stress and injury in the muscles of the forearm. These factors should be considered in assessing the workplace in terms of acute and cumulative loading.     

Characterisation of forces exerted by the entire hand during the power grip: effect of the handle diameter

The objective of this study was to analyse the effect of the handle diameter on the grip forces exerted by the hand during a maximal power grip task. A handle ergometer, combining six instrumented beams and a pressure map, was used to determine the forces exerted by the palm side of the hand regrouping data from 10 anatomical sites (fingertips, phalanges, thumb, palm…). This methodology provided results giving new insight into the effect of the handle diameter on the forces exerted by the hand. First, it appeared that the relationship between the hand length/handle diameter ratio and the maximal grip force fit a U-inverted curve with maximal values observed for a handle diameter measuring 17.9% of the hand length. Second, it was showed that the handle diameter influenced the forces exerted on the anatomical sites of the hand. Finally, it was showed that the handle diameter influenced the finger force sharing particularly for the index and the little fingers. Practitioner Summary: This study analysed the effect of the handle diameter on the grip forces exerted by the hand during a maximal power grip force. This study showed that measurement of the totality of the forces exerted at the hand/handle interface is needed to better understand the ergonomics of handle tools. Our results could be re-used by designers and clinicians in order to develop handle tools which prevent hand pathologies.     

Power hand tool vibration effects on grip exertions

Operation of vibrating power hand tools can result in excessive grip force, which may increase the risk of cumulative trauma disorders in the upper extremities. An experiment was performed to study grip force exerted by 14 subjects operating a simulated hand tool vibrating at 9.8 m/s² and 49 m/s² acceleration magnitudes, at 40 Hz and 160 Hz frequencies, with vibration delivered in three orthogonal directions, and with 1.5kg and 3.0kg load weights. Average grip force increased from 25.3 N without vibration to 32.1 N (27%) for vibration at 40 Hz, and to 27.1N (7%) for vibration at 160 Hz. Average grip force also increased from 27.4 N at 9.8 m/s² acceleration to 31.8 N (16%) at 49m/s². Significant interactions between acceleration x frequency, and frequency x direction were also found. The largest average grip force increase was from 25.3N without vibration to 35.8N (42%) for 40 Hz and 49 m/s² vibration. The magnitude of this increase was of the same order as for a two-fold increase in load weight, where average grip force increased from 22.5N to 35.0N (56%). A second experiment studied hand flexor and extensor muscle responses using electromyography for five subjects holding a handle vibrating at 8 m/s² using ISO weighted acceleration, with frequencies of 20 Hz, 40 Hz, 80 Hz and 160 Hz, and grip forces of 5%, 10% and 15% of maximum voluntary contraction. Muscle responses were greatest at frequencies where grip force was affected, indicating that the tonic vibration reflex was the likely cause of increased grip exertions.     

An investigation on the relationship between grip, push and contact forces applied to a tool handle

Owing to the strong dependence of the health risks associated with vibration exposure of the human hand and arm on hand force, a laboratory study was conducted to develop a methodology for measurement of the contact force at the tool handle–hand interface, and to identify the relationship between the contact force and the hand grip and push forces. A simulated tool handle fixture was realized in the laboratory to measure the grip and push forces using compression/extension force sensors integrated within the handle and a force plate, respectively. The contact force was derived through integration of the interface pressure over the contact area. These were measured using a capacitive pressure-sensing grid. The measurements were performed with 10 male subjects and three circular cross-section handles of different sizes under different combinations of grip and push forces. The hand–handle interface pressure data were analyzed to derive the contact force, as functions of the constant magnitudes of the grip and push forces, and the handle size. The results suggest that the hand–handle contact force is strongly dependent upon not only the grip and push forces but also the handle diameter. The contact force for a given handle size can be expressed as a linear combination of grip and push forces, where the contribution of the grip force is considerably larger than that of the push force. The results further suggest that a linear relation can characterize the dependence of the contact force on the handle diameter. The validity of the proposed relationship is demonstrated by evaluating the magnitudes of errors between the estimated contact forces with the measured data for the range of handle diameters, and grip and push forces considered in the study.

Relevance to industry

The methodology proposed in this study can be applied to measure the effective hand–handle contact force at workplaces for assessing the health risks associated with exposure to hand-transmitted vibration exposure and hand–wrist cumulative trauma. The relationship proposed in the study could be effectively applied for estimating the hand–handle contact force from known grip and push forces that are conveniently and directly measurable in laboratory studies involving vibration analyses of the human hand, power tools and relevant vibration attenuation devices. It is expected to be most useful in field applications, where it could provide an estimate of the range of magnitudes of the hand-grip force applied to the handle of an actual tool, which is quite difficult and expensive to measure. The relationship is also expected to contribute to the on-going standardization efforts for defining a correction factor to account for the effects of hand force on the vibration transmission and hand injuries.     

Effects of user experience,working posture and joint hardness on powered nutrunner torque reactions

Powered hand tools produce reaction forces that may be associated with upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders. The handle displacement, grip force and upper limb muscle activity (electromyography (EMG)) due to the effects of operator experience, working height and distance, type of tool and fastener joint hardness were measured in this study with 15 experienced and 15 novice nutrunner users. The results show that when pistol grip handles were used to work on a horizontal surface, experienced users allowed an average handle displacement of 7.9°, while novice users allowed 11.5°. Average EMG scaled by reference voluntary contraction (RVC) at forearm flexors, forearm extensors and biceps were greater for experienced users (318% RVC, 285% RVC, 143% RVC, respectively) than for novice users (246% RVC, 219% RVC, 113% RVC, respectively). Experienced users exerted more grip force than novice users when using right angle handles, but less force when using pistol grip handles. The results suggest that it is possible to minimize tool handle displacement by adapting the workplace layout to permit different working postures for each user group.     

Contributions and co-ordination of individual fingers in multiple finger prehension

The contributions and co-ordination of external ringer grip forces were examined during a lifting task with a precision grip using multiple fingers. The subjects ( n = 10) lifted a force transducer-equipped grip apparatus. Grip force from each of the five fingers was continuously measured under different object weight (200 g, 400 g, and 800 g) and surface structure (plastic and sandpaper) conditions. The effect of five-, four-, and three-finger grip modes was also examined. It was found that variation of object weight or surface friction resulted in change of the total grip force magnitude; the largest change in finger force, was that for the index finger, followed by the middle, ring, and little fingers. Percentage contribution of static grip force to the total grip force for the index, middle, ring, and little fingers was 420%, 27·4%, 17·6% and 12·9%, respectively. These values were fairly constant for all object weight conditions, as well as for all surface friction conditions, suggesting that all individual finger force adjustments for light loads less than 800 g are controlled comprehensively simply by using a single common scaling value. A higher surface friction provided faster lifting initiation and required lesser grip force exertion, indicating advantageous effect of a non-slippery surface over a slippery surface. The results indicate that nearly 40% force reduction can be obtained when a non-slippery surface is used. Variation in grip mode changed the total grip force, i.e., the fewer the number of fingers, the greater the total grip force. The percent value of static grip force for the index, middle, and ring fingers in the four-finger grip mode was 42·7%, 32·5%, and 24·7%, respectively, and that for the index and middle fingers in the three-finger grip mode was 43·0% and 56·9%, respectively. Therefore, the grip mode was found to influence the force contributions of the middle and ring fingers, but not of the index finger.     

Power grip force is modulated in repeated elbow movement

The objective of this study was to quantitatively investigate the modulation of power grip force under repeated elbow movement and its relation to muscle cocontraction and potential risk of developing cumulative trauma disorders (CTD). Thirteen right-handed participants without any neuromuscular disorders were recruited. Participants were instructed to hold a digital dynamometer in the hand with three levels of grip forces (20%, 40% and 60% of the maximum grip force) and perform repeated arm movement in the sagittal plane at three speeds (slow, self-paced and fast) with the upper arm voluntarily held by side by the participant. With the increase of motion rate and target force level, the grip force fluctuation, finger flexor muscle activities, elbow muscles cocontraction and apparent stiffness were significantly increased (p < 0.01). This study suggests that the power grip coupled with fast arm movement be avoided as much as possible in the workplace. PRACTITIONER SUMMARY: Power grip is usually accompanied with arm movement in workplaces and the increased physical demand might result in higher muscle activities and potentially higher risk of repetitive musculoskeletal injuries.     

Power grip strength as a function of tool handle orientation and location

Thirty male volunteers participated in a study evaluating the effect of workspace envelope (work height and reach distance) and handle orientation on grip force capacity. Maximum voluntary power grip exertions were recorded using instrumented tool handles under three conditions: a pistol grip tool handle oriented horizontally and vertically and a right angle tool handle oriented horizontally. Significant main effects of handle height and reach location on normalized grip force capacity were observed with the horizontally oriented pistol grip and right angle handles, whereas only an interaction effect was observed with the vertically oriented pistol grip handle. Comparison of results to scores produced with a job assessment tool (RULA) is included as an appendix. The proposed methodology can provide information useful to job, workstation or tool design directed toward best accommodating the physical capacities of workers performing hand tool tasks.     

Measurement of handle forces for crimping connectors and cutting cable in the electric power industry

Overhead and underground line work in the electric power industry is physically very strenuous and can expose workers to musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs), particularly in the upper extremity. Crimping compression connectors—such as sleeve connectors and lugs—and cutting cables are two of the most frequent tasks that line workers perform. Line workers at many utilities in the US crimp connectors and cut cable with long-handled manual tools. However, the actual magnitude of the forces applied to the handles of these tools is not known. The objectives of this laboratory study were to measure the forces applied to the handles of a manual press and a manual cutter in order to connect typical wire gauges and cut common cables, respectively. The handles of the manual press and cutter were attached to the drive cylinder and load cell of an Instrom Material Testing System, and peak forces exerted against the handles were measured. Results showed that the outer die of the manual press required about 50% more handle force than crimping connectors with the inner die location. The peak handle forces required to cut aluminum conductor cable as large as 2 cm diameter exceeded 500 N and were about 200 N greater than the peak forces to compress connectors manually. When the peak force data were compared to strength capabilities reported in the literature, less than 1% of the general population was found to have the maximum strength to manually make one crimp on a common overhead connector. Less than 1% and approximately 50% of the female and male general population, respectively, were found to have the maximum strength to manually cut a cable with a 2 cm diameter conductor. Handle force data from this study provide a biomechanical framework for explaining how the job demands of overhead and underground line workers could possibly cause MSDs.

Relevance to industry

Electric power utilities can review their work practices and tools in order to determine whether they can reduce the exposure of their workers to risk factors of MSDs, as well as reduce their cost of health care. Manufacturers of crimping and cutting tools can use the experimental approach in this study to measure the external forces required for their respective tools and then set quantitative force benchmarks to improve the design of their tools.     

The transmission of vibration through gloves: effects of push force,vibration magnitude and inter-subject variability

The extent to which a glove modifies the risks from hand-transmitted vibration is quantified in ISO 10819:1996 by a measure of glove transmissibility determined with one vibration magnitude, one contact force with a handle and only three subjects. This study was designed to investigate systematically the vibration transmissibility of four ‘anti-vibration’ gloves over the frequency range 16–1600 Hz with 12 subjects, at six magnitudes of vibration (0.25–8.0 ms^?2 r.m.s.) and with six push forces (5 N to 80 N). The four gloves showed different transmissibility characteristics that were not greatly affected by vibration magnitude but highly dependent on push force. In all conditions, the variability in transmissibility between subjects was as great as the variability between gloves. It is concluded that a standardised test of glove dynamic performance should include a wide range of hands and a range of forces representative of those occurring in work with vibratory tools.

Statement of Relevance: The transmission of vibration through anti-vibration gloves is highly dependent on the push force between the hand and a handle and also highly dependent on the hand that is inside the glove. The influence of neither factor is well reflected in ISO 10819:1996, the current standard for anti-vibration gloves.     

Feasibility analysis of low-cost flexible resistive sensors for measurements of driving point mechanical impedance of the hand-arm system

This study explored the feasibility of the flexible resistive (FlexiForce) force sensors for measurement of the hand-arm biodynamic response. Two FlexiForce sensors were installed on an instrumented handle to measure the palm-handle and finger–handle interface dynamic forces. The measurements were performed with six subjects grasping a 38 mm diameter instrumented handle with nine different combinations of grip (10, 30 and 50 N) and push (25, 50 and 75 N) forces and two levels of broad-band random vibration (1.5 and 3.0 m/s² weighted rms acceleration) in the 4–1000 Hz frequency range. The data acquired from the instrumented handle was analyzed to determine the palm and finger impedance responses, which served as the reference values to evaluate feasibility of the FlexiForce sensors. The comparisons revealed very similar trends, while the impedance magnitude responses obtained from the FlexiForce sensors were substantially lower in the entire frequency range than the reference values, except at very low frequencies. A correction function was subsequently developed and applied to the FlexiForce measured data, which resulted in similar hand-arm impedance response trends compared to the reference values. It was concluded that the low-cost FlexiForce sensors could be applied for measurements of biodynamic responses of the hand-arm system in real tool handles in the field. Due to the physiological risks associated with prolonged exposure to tool vibration the applicability of a low-cost biodynamic response measurement system can be used as a preventative measure for such risks.Relevance to industryThe measurement of hand–handle interface forces is vital for assessing the hand-transmitted vibration exposure and the biodynamic responses of the hand-arm system to vibration. The low cost and flexible sensors, proposed in the study, could be conveniently applied to the curved surfaces of real power tool handles in the field. The most significant benefit of the sensors lies with its negligible mass and thereby the instrumented handle inertia-induced errors in the biodynamic responses can be eliminated.     

A study of hand grip pressure distribution and EMG of finger flexor muscles under dynamic loads

A matrix of miniature and flexible pressure sensors is proposed to measure the grip pressure distribution (GPD) at the hand-handle interface of a vibrating handle. The GPD was acquired under static and dynamic loads for various levels of grip forces and magnitudes of vibration at different discrete frequencies in the 20–1000 Hz range. The EMG of finger flexor muscles was acquired using the silver-silver chloride surface electrodes under different static and dynamic loads. The measured data was analysed to study the influence of grip force, and magnitude and frequency characteristics of handle vibration on: (i) the local concentration of forces at the hand-handle interface; and (ii) the electrical activity of the finger flexor muscles. The results of the study revealed high interface pressure near the tips of index and middle fingers, and base of the thumb under static grip conditions. This concentration of high pressure shifted towards the middle of the fingers under dynamic loads, irrespective of the grip force, excitation frequency, and acceleration levels. The electrical activity of the finger flexor muscles increased considerably with the grip force under static as well as dynamic loads. The electrical activity under dynamic loads was observed to be 1·5–6·0 times higher than that under the static loads.