Changes in plasma epinephrine concentration and in heart rate during head-up tilt testing in patients with neurocardiogenic syncope: correlation with successful therapy with beta-receptor antagonists

OBJECTIVE: To develop, implement and evaluate an effective and efficient heparin nomogram. DESIGN: Retrospective and prospective data collection. SETTING: Coronary care unit (CCU) of a university-affiliated hospital. PATIENTS: Patients with acute coronary ischemic syndromes requiring intravenous (i.v.) heparin who were not receiving thrombolytic and/or warfarin therapy. INTERVENTIONS: A retrospective chart review of 52 CCU patients receiving iv heparin provided the historical control group. The effectiveness of a heparin nomogram (5000 U bolus followed by an initial weight-based infusion of 15 U/kg/h with subsequent rate adjustments according to activated partial thromboplastin time [aPTT] results) was then prospectively assessed in a further 56 consecutive patients. MAIN RESULTS: The historical control and nomogram groups did not significantly differ with respect to age, weight, duration of therapy or total number of aPTTs drawn. Approximately 79% and 84% of patients in the control and nomogram groups, respectively, achieved an aPTT within the therapeutic range (60 to 90 s, P > 0.05), whereas 89% and 100% of control and nomogram patients, respectively, surpassed the therapeutic threshold (longer than 60 s) at some point during treatment (P = 0.009). Compared with empiric dose adjustment, the nomogram more effectively avoided periods of inadequate anticoagulation. Similarly, the time to achieve the therapeutic threshold was significantly longer in the control than in the nomogram group (8.2 +/- 5.9 versus 6.7 +/- 3.7 h, P = 0.026). No adverse bleeding events were noted in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with conventional approaches, the heparin nomogram successfully achieved and maintained adequate anticoagulation in a greater proportion of patients with acute cardiovascular diseases without the need for additional aPTT measurements.     

Inability of the activated partial thromboplastin time to predict heparin levels. Time to reassess guidelines for heparin assays

BACKGROUND: In treating venous thromboembolic disorders, patient outcomes appear to correlate with heparin levels. Due to pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variations, a relationship between heparin dose and level cannot be reliably predicted in individual patients. Some patients have low heparin levels despite therapeutic activated partial thromboplastin times (aPTTs), which may increase their risk for recurrent thromboembolism. Patients with high heparin requirements appear to have fewer bleeding episodes with heparin level-guided therapy. The aPTT does not reliably correlate with heparin blood concentrations or antithrombotic effects. Consequently, heparin therapy monitored with heparin levels may be more effective and safer. OBJECTIVES: To prospectively determine whether (1) the aPTT therapeutic range adequately predicts heparin levels in 38 patients used to establish the therapeutic aPTT range as is currently recommended and (2) whether 3 paired sets of aPTT-antifactor Xa levels provide the basis for using aPTTs to predict subsequent heparin levels in individual patients (n = 27) receiving intravenous heparin for coronary artery disease or venous thromboembolic disease. RESULTS: In the therapeutic aPTT range established, the R2 value for the relationship was 0.4. Prediction intervals were wide. For an aPTT of 60 seconds, the 95% prediction interval estimates were heparin levels of 0.05 to 1.0 U/mL. In individual patients, the aPTT-antifactor Xa relationship had an average R2 value of 0.75. There was no consistent relationship between the aPTT and anti-factor Xa level in a significant number of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The aPTT does not appear to be a useful surrogate for heparin levels. These findings suggest that the current recommendations on the use of heparin levels should be expanded.     

Weight-based heparin dosing: clinical response and resource utilization

The objective of this study was to assess a weight-based heparin (WBH) nomogram (80-U/kg bolus, 18-U/kg-per-hour initial infusion) and determine its clinical performance and impact on resource utilization. All patients treated with heparin for venous thromboembolism or unstable angina during a 15-week study period were included in this retrospective, chart-review study. Three groups were identified: patients treated with WBH, patients whose regimen deviated from the weight-based nomogram (DEV), and matched historical controls (HCs). In patients receiving heparin for more than 24 hours, those treated with WBH achieved threshold activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) levels significantly faster than did HC or DEV patients. However, 42% of WBH-treated patients were found to have initial supratherapeutic responses. Logistic regression analysis identified age > or =67 years, prior warfarin therapy within 7 days of heparin, and high initial infusion rate as predictive of a supratherapeutic aPTT response; smoking was predictive of a subtherapeutic response. Bleeding events were not significantly different between groups. An infusion rate of 15 U/kg per hour was found to closely approximate our population's actual heparin infusion requirement. Resource utilization was significantly different between the WBH and HC groups in terms of nursing interventions at 48 to 72 hours. We concluded that WBH rapidly drives patients' aPTT response above the therapeutic threshold for heparin; however, prudent adjustment of the initial infusion rate is necessary to avoid a supratherapeutic aPTT response. Our data support a nomogram with an initial infusion rate of 15 U/kg per hour.     

A randomized, multicenter trial of weight-adjusted intravenous heparin dose titration and point-of-care coagulation monitoring in hospitalized patients with active thromboembolic disease. Antithrombotic Therapy Consortium Investigators

BACKGROUND: Therapy with intravenous unfractionated heparin improves clinical outcome in patients with active thromboembolic disease, but achieving and maintaining a therapeutic level of anticoagulation remains a major challenge for clinicians. METHODS: A total of 113 patients requiring heparin for at least 48 hours were randomly assigned at 7 medical centers to either weight-adjusted or non-weight-adjusted dose titration. They were separately assigned to either laboratory-based or point-of-care (bedside) coagulation monitoring. RESULTS: Weight-adjusted heparin dosing yielded a higher mean activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) value 6 hours after treatment initiation than non-weight-adjusted dosing (99.9 vs 78.8 seconds; P =.002) and reduced the time required to exceed a minimum threshold (aPTT >45 seconds) of anticoagulation (10.5 vs 8.6 hours; P =.002). Point-of-care coagulation monitoring significantly reduced the time from blood sample acquisition to a heparin infusion adjustment (0.4 vs 1.6 hours; P <.0001) and to reach the therapeutic aPTT range (51 to 80 seconds) (16.1 vs 19.4 hours; P =.24) compared with laboratory monitoring. Although a majority of patients participating in the study surpassed the minimum threshold of anticoagulation within the first 12 hours and reached the target aPTT within 24 hours, maintaining the aPTT within the therapeutic range was relatively uncommon (on average 30% of the overall study period) and did not differ between treatment or monitoring strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Weight-adjusted heparin dosing according to a standardized titration nomogram combined with point-of-care coagulation monitoring using the BMC Coaguchek Plus System represents an effective and widely generalizable strategy for managing patients with thromboembolic disease that fosters the rapid achievement of a desired range of anticoagulation. Additional work is needed, however, to improve on existing patient-specific strategies that can more effectively sustain a therapeutic state of anticoagulation.     

Activated partial thromboplastin time and outcome after thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: results from the GUSTO-I trial

BACKGROUND: Although intravenous heparin is commonly used after thrombolytic therapy, few reports have addressed the relationship between the degree of anticoagulation and clinical outcomes. We examined the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) in 29,656 patients in the Global Utilization of Streptokinase and t-PA for Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO-I) trial and analyzed the relationship between the aPTT and both baseline patient characteristics and clinical outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: Intravenous heparin was administered as a 5000-U bolus followed by an initial infusion of 1000 U/h, with dose adjustment to achieve a target aPTT of 60 to 85 seconds. aPTTs were collected 6, 12, and 24 hours after thrombolytic administration. Higher aPTT at 24 hours was strongly related to lower patient weight (P < .00001) as well as older age, female sex, and lack of cigarette smoking (all PT< .0001). At 12 hours, the aPTT associated with the lowest 30-day mortality, stroke, and bleeding rates was 50 to 70 seconds. There was an unexpected direct relationship between the aPTT and the risk of subsequent reinfarction. There was a clustering of reinfarction in the first 10 hours after discontinuation of intravenous heparin. CONCLUSIONS: Although the relationship between aPTT and clinical outcome was confounded to some degree by the influence of baseline prognostic characteristics, aPTTs higher than 70 seconds were found to be associated with higher likelihood of mortality, stroke, bleeding, and reinfarction. These findings suggest that until proven otherwise, we should consider the aPTT range of 50 to 70 seconds as optimal with intravenous heparin after thrombolytic therapy.     

Establishing an institution-specific therapeutic range for heparin

The relationship between heparin concentration and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) in pooled plasma was compared with that in patient samples to assess the feasibility of using heparin-spiked pooled plasma in determining a therapeutic range for aPTT. Blood samples were taken from 32 patients who had been receiving intravenous unfractionated heparin sodium for more than 24 hours. The samples were stored at -70 degrees C until anti-Xa assay within three months of collection. Pooled normal plasma was spiked with unfractionated heparin sodium to produce nominal anti-Xa concentrations of 0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, and 0.5 unit/mL. Heparin concentrations and a aPTT values were measured, and the relationship between the two was determined by linear regression. For the ex vivo samples, the range of aPTT values corresponding to therapeutic heparin concentrations of 0.3-0.7 anti-Xa unit/mL was 64-106 seconds, which corresponds to an aPTT range of 2.3-3.9 times the mean of the normal range (compared with the traditionally defined therapeutic range of 1.5-2.5 times the control value). For the in vitro samples, the aPTT range corresponding to heparin concentrations of 0.3-0.7 unit/mL was 121-256 seconds, which corresponds to an aPTT range of 4.4-9.4 times the mean of the normal range. Each institution should establish a therapeutic aPTT range by calibrating aPTT values against heparin concentrations from blood samples of patients receiving intravenous heparin.     

Intravenous theophylline therapy: nomogram guidelines

We evolved a nomogram for guiding and standardizing intravenous theophylline therapy in hospitalized patients. It provides rapid calculation of a loading dose based on body weight and previous therapy and a maintenance infusion rate related to three categories of expected metabolic activity. The guidelines were prospectively used in the treatment of 72 patients, mainly in a respiratory care unit. The nomogram was successfully used to attain near-steady-state serum concentrations in the therapeutic range of 8 to 20 mg/litre in 72% of patients, with only two patients outside of the range of 5 to 25 mg/litre. These guidelines facilitate initial theophylline dosage in older patients with liver and cardiac disease and provide a rational basis for interpreting serum concentration measurements and adjustment of drug therapy.     

Automated heparin-delivery system to control activated partial thromboplastin time: evaluation in normal volunteers

BACKGROUND: Unfractionated heparin is used widely; however, control of the level of anticoagulation remains its greatest problem, with fewer than 35% of patients having activated partial thromboplastin times (aPTTs) within a range of 55 to 85 seconds in recent trials. METHODS AND RESULTS: We developed and tested a prototype of an automated heparin control system (AutoHep) in which a computer-based titration algorithm adjusted the heparin infusion to reach a target aPTT. In 1 study, 12 healthy male subjects received an intravenous infusion of heparin with the rate determined by AutoHep and were randomized to receive an initial bolus or no bolus of heparin preceding the infusion. A second study evaluated the automated blood sampling system in 12 subjects. Of the 344 end-point aPTT measurements, 78% were within +/-10 seconds of the target (prespecified primary end point), and 89% were within a +/-15-second range. The time to achieve a target aPTT was 93 minutes without and 150 minutes with an initial heparin bolus. The total percentage of time within the target range +/-15 seconds was 46 of 48 hours (96%). The automatic blood sampling system successfully obtained 96% of all scheduled samples. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the AutoHep system has the potential to significantly improve aPTT control of intravenous heparin compared with current clinical practice.     

Reevaluation of a weight-based heparin dosing nomogram: is institution-specific modification necessary?

OBJECTIVE: To compare a heparin dosing nomogram using an initial infusion rate of 18 units/kg/h with physician-directed heparin prescribing and with a modified version of the nomogram adjusted for institution-specific data. METHODS: During consecutive phases of this cohort study, patients' intravenous heparin therapies were initiated and adjusted by using one of the following three methods: (1) physician-directed dosing, (2) a body weight-based dosing nomogram with an initial infusion rate of 18 units/kg/h, and (3) a body weight-based dosing nomogram with an initial infusion rate determined by the median dose of heparin (in units/kg/h) required to achieve therapeutic activated partial thromboplastin times (aPTTs) during the first two phases. The time required to achieve therapeutic aPTTs as well as the percentage of initial aPTTs in the therapeutic range were compared for the three phases. RESULTS: The heparin dosing nomogram in which the initial infusion rate was adjusted for our individual institution resulted in a statistically shorter median time until aPTTs were in the therapeutic range than did either the physician-directed dosing or unmodified nomogram groups (6.1 h in the modified nomogram group, 10.5 h in the physician-directed group, 21.5 h in the unmodified nomogram group; p < 0.05 for all differences). Use of the institution-specific nomogram resulted in the greatest percentage of initial aPTTs in the therapeutic range (84% in the 13 units/kg/h nomogram group vs. 47% in the physician-directed group and 18% in the 18 units/kg/h nomogram group; p < 0.05 for all differences). CONCLUSIONS: Use of a heparin dosing nomogram with an initial infusion rate of 18 units/kg/h resulted in prolongation of the time to reach therapeutic aPTTs. By modifying the nomogram for use at an individual institution, we reduced the time to achieve therapeutic range of aPTTs while still reducing the likelihood of excessive anticoagulation of patients.     

Guidelines for management of left-sided prosthetic valve thrombosis: a role for thrombolytic therapy. Consensus Conference on Prosthetic Valve Thrombosis

OBJECTIVES: We sought to form a consensus recommendation for management of prosthetic valve thrombosis (PVT) from previous case and uncontrolled reports from a consensus of international specialists. BACKGROUND: PVT and thromboembolism relate to inadequate anticoagulation and valve type and location. PVT is suspected by history (dyspnea) and auscultation (muffled valve sounds or new murmurs) and confirmed by Doppler echocardiography showing a marked valve gradient. METHODS: A consensus conference was held to recommend management of left-sided PVT. RESULTS: Transesophageal Doppler echocardiography is used to visualize abnormal leaflet motion and the size, location and mobility of thrombus. Thrombolysis is used for high risk surgical candidates with left-sided PVT (New York Heart Association functional class III or IV) because cerebral thromboembolism may occur in 12% of patients. Duration of thrombolysis depends on resolution of pressure gradients and valve areas to near normal by Doppler echocardiography performed every few hours. Lysis is stopped after 72 or 24 h if there is no hemodynamic improvement (operation indicated). Heparin infusion with frequent measurement of activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) begins when aPTT is more than twice control levels and can be converted to warfarin (international normalized ratio [INR] 2.5 to 3.5) plus aspirin (81 to 100 mg/day). Patients in functional class I or II have lower surgical mortality, and those with large immobile thrombi on the prosthetic valve or left atrium have responded to endogenous lysis with combined subcutaneous heparin every 12 h (aPTT 55 to 80 s) plus warfarin (INR 2.5 to 3.5) for 1 to 6 months. Operation is advised for nonresponders or patients with mobile thrombi. CONCLUSIONS: Thrombolysis, followed by heparin, warfarin and aspirin, is advised for high risk surgical candidates with left-sided PVT.     

Effect of intravenous heparin infusion on thrombin-antithrombin complex and fibrinopeptide A in unstable angina

BACKGROUND: In unstable angina, the clinical efficacy of heparin is limited in time, and recurrence of adverse events has been reported after discontinuation of the anticoagulant. METHODS: In 21 episodes of unstable angina, we used the plasma level of fibrinopeptide A (FPA) and of thrombin-antithrombin complex (TAT) to evaluate the pattern of thrombin inhibition by heparin and the effect of stopping heparin and initiating aspirin. RESULTS: At admission, the plasma level of FPA was increased: median value 3.7 ng/mL compared with 5.5 ng/mL in a control group of 20 patients with early myocardial infarction (not significant). The following findings were observed during a 4-day course of intravenous heparin infusion: (1) FPA decreased significantly 6 hours after the start of therapy; (2) FPA was lower when activated partial thromboplastic time (aPTT) was >1.5 times baseline; (3) there was a significant negative correlation between aPTT and FPA. Twenty-four hours after heparin was discontinued and aspirin initiated, a significant increase in TAT and FPA in plasma was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The results confirm ongoing fibrin formation in the active phase of unstable angina, indicate incomplete and variable inhibition of thrombin by heparin during continuous infusion, and suggest a risk of re-emergence of thrombosis (in spite of initiating aspirin) 24 hours after withdrawal of heparin. Data demonstrate a better control of thrombin activity when heparin is infused at rates that maintain aPTT at >1.5 times baseline, as currently recommended in unstable angina.     

Heparin-coated Palmaz-Schatz stents in human coronary arteries. Early outcome of the Benestent-II Pilot Study

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the Benestent-II Pilot Study was to evaluate the safety of delaying and eliminating anticoagulant therapy in patients receiving a heparin-coated stent in conjunction with antiplatelet drugs. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study consisted of three initial phases (I, II, III) during which resumption of heparin therapy after sheath removal was progressively deferred by 6, 12, and 36 hours. In phase IV, coumadin and heparin were replaced by 250 mg ticlopidine and 100 mg aspirin. Of the 207 patients with stable angina pectoris and a de novo lesion in whom heparin-coated stent implantation was attempted, implantation was successful in 202 patients (98%). Stent thrombosis did not occur during all four phases, and the overall clinical success rate at discharge was 99%. Bleeding complications requiring blood transfusion or surgery fell from 7.9% in phase I to 5.9%, 4%, and 0% in the three following phases. Hospital stay was 7.4, 6.1, 7.2, and 3.1 days for the consecutive phases. The restenosis rate for the combined four phases was 13% (15% in phase I, 20% in phase II, 11% in phase III, and 6% in phase IV). The overall rate of reintervention for the four phases was 8.9%. At 6 months, 84%, 75%, 94%, and 92% of the patients of phases I to IV, respectively, were event free. For the four phases, the event-free rate was 86%, which compares favorably with the rate observed in the Benestent-I study (80%; relative risk, 0.68 [0.45 to 1.04]). CONCLUSIONS: The implantation of stents coated with polyamine and end-point-attached heparin in stable patients with one significant de novo coronary lesion is well tolerated, is associated with no (sub)acute stent thrombosis, and results in a favorable event-free survival after 6 months.     

Stenosis of the tubular neck: a possible mechanism for progressive renal failure

OBJECTIVE: To study the influence of continuous administration of heparin on platelet function in intensive care patients. DESIGN: Prospective, serial investigation. SETTING: Clinical investigation on a surgical and neurosurgical intensive care unit in a university hospital. PATIENTS: The study included 45 patients: 15 postoperative with patients sepsis (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score between 15 and 25), 15 trauma patients (Injury Severity Score 15 to 25), and 15 neurosurgical patients. INTERVENTIONS: Management of the patients was carried out according to the guidelines for modern intensive care therapy. Sepsis and trauma patients received standard (unfractionated) heparin continuously [aim: an activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) approximately 2.0 times normal value; sepsis-heparin and trauma-heparin patients], whereas neurosurgical patients received no heparin (neurosurgical patients). MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: From arterial blood samples, platelet aggregation was measured by the turbidimetric method. Platelet aggregation was induced by adenosine diphosphate (ADP; 2.0 mumol/l), collagen (10 micrograms/ml), and epinephrine (25 mumol/l). Measurements were carried out on the day of diagnosis of sepsis or 12 h after hemodynamic stabilization (trauma and neurosurgery patients) (baseline) and during the next 5 days at 12.00 noon. Standard coagulation parameters [platelet count and fibrinogen and antithrombin III (AT III) plasma concentrations] were also monitored. Heparin 4-10 U/kg per h (mean dose: approximately 500 U/h) was necessary to reach an aPTT of about 2.0 times normal. Platelet count was highest in the neurosurgical patients, but it did not decrease after heparin administration to the trauma and sepsis patients. AT III and fibrinogen plasma levels were similar in the three groups of patients. In the sepsis group, platelet aggregation variables decreased significantly (e.g., epinephrine-induced maximum platelet aggregation:-45 relative % from baseline value). Platelet function recovered during the study and even exceeded baseline values (e.g., ADP-induced maximum platelet aggregation: +42.5 relative % from baseline value). Continuous heparinization did not blunt this increase of platelet aggregation variables. In the heparinized trauma patients, platelet aggregation variables remained almost stable and were no different to platelet aggregation data in the untreated neurosurgical patients. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous administration of heparin with an average dose of approximately 500 U/h did not negatively influence platelet function in the trauma patients. Recovery from reduced platelet function in the sepsis group was not affected by continuous heparinization. Thus, continuous heparinization with this dose appears to be safe with regard to platelet function in the intensive care patient.     

Coronary angiography by left radial approach. A bi-center prospective pilot study

The aim of this study was to assess prospectively the feasibility, safety and quality of coronary angiography performed by a left radial arterial approach. The investigation was performed under local anesthesia with a Lidocaine gel using Judkins 5f catheter. A bolus of heparin was injected intravenously at the start of the procedure (no heparin in phase 0.2 to 3.000 IU during phase 1 and 5.000 IU in phase 2). Between March 1994 and January 1996, after exclusion of 108 patients (15.1%) mainly because of an abnormal Allen test, coronary angiography was carried out in 540 patients aged 58.4 +/- 11.7 years, 85% of whom were men. The failure rate was 8%. The quality of opacification of the left coronary artery (scale 1 to 3) was 2.91 +/- 0.27 and of the right coronary artery was 2.96 +/- 0.18. There were no complications during the procedure. Analysis of the learning curve showed a failure rate decreasing to less than 5% after 60 procedures/operator. In the last 100 procedures, the failure rate fell to 3%, the canulation time was 2.2 +/- 2.5 min, the duration of fluoroscopy was 6.5 +/- 3.9 min and the duration of the procedure was 17.5 +/- 4.7 min (14.7 +/- 3.8 min, p < 0.01, by the femoral approach). Clinical and Doppler ultrasonographic follow-up revealed one in-hospital complication (a spontaneously regressive compressive haematoma). No clinical complications were observed at 3 months. Doppler ultrasonography showed the radial artery occlusion rate to be 71% in phase 0.32% in phase 1 and 3.2% in phase 2 (p < 0.0001). These results show that the left radial arterial approach for coronary angiography is safe and effective but requires a period of training. A 5.000 IU dose of heparin limits the risk of radial artery occlusion to 3%. The absence of complications in this large series which included the training period and the patient comfort suggest that this technique may be an excellent alternative to the femoral approach and especially the brachial approach when the Allen test is normal.     

Antibiotic resistance pattern and R-plasmids of Acinetobacter calcoaceticus subsp. anitratus

Our objective was to define the maximum tolerated dose of an escalating dose of ifosfamide in combination with a fixed dose of doxorubicin supported by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (Neupogen). Eighteen women with stage IV breast cancer were enrolled in a Phase I study of an escalating dose of ifosfamide (1.2 g/m2/day for 5 days-2.75 g/m2/day for 5 days) with doxorubicin 20 mg/m2/day for 3 days. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was used at 5 microgram/kg on day 6 until hematological recovery. Prophylactic antibiotics were also used. The maximum tolerated dose of ifosfamide in combination with doxorubicin was 2.75 g/m2/day for 5 days. The objective response rate was 83% with a complete response rate of 33% (6/18 patients); the median time to treatment failure was 11.5 months. The median survival has not been reached and will exceed 18 months. We concluded that the recommended dose of ifosfamide in combination with doxorubicin is 2.5 g/m2/day for 5 days. This combination shows promise in stage IV breast cancer.     

Heparin therapy in the Chinese--lower doses are required

Warfarin requirements are lower in the Chinese, but it is not known if this applies to heparin. We investigated the optimal dose for heparin therapy in Chinese patients, and to assess relationship between i.v. heparin dosage and anticoagulation efficacy. One hundred Chinese patients requiring intravenous heparin therapy were given an initial bolus followed by continuous intravenous infusion. The main outcome measures were: (i) Efficacy of anticoagulation assessed by blood coagulation studies (APTT) compared to heparin dosage, (ii) Determinants of dosage variation-age, gender, body weight, height, indication for heparin therapy and number of medications, other disease, and serum albumin level. It was found that the mean therapeutic infusion dose requirement of heparin was 848.7 +/- 274.7 units/h, 79% required a dose of 1000 units/h or less. Heparin dose correlated negatively with age (r = -0.40; p < 0.001) and positively with weight (r = 0.44 p < 0.001) and height (r = 0.49; p < 0.001). Chinese subjects require lower heparin doses (about 800 units/h) than usually recommended for Caucasians (usual dose 1000-1500 units/h). This can be partly explained by the lower body weight in Chinese patients.     

Use of modified functional assays for activated protein C resistance in patients with basally prolonged aPTT

Inherited resistance to activated protein C (APCr) is currently recognized as the most prevalent cause underlying venous thrombophilia, with an estimated prevalence around 20% in thrombotic patients and around 1.8-7% in the general population. A correct laboratory diagnosis of APCr is therefore essential. Two different diagnostic approaches are at present at our disposal: the semi-quantitative plasma test based on the measurement of two aPTTs (in the presence and absence of activated protein C), and the detection of the factor V Arg506 Gln mutation by DNA analysis. In this study we firstly evaluated sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic efficiency of an aPTT-based plasma clotting test (Chromogenix, Sweden) versus DNA analysis; then, since the APC resistance test is invalidated by a basally prolonged aPTT (i.e. during warfarin and heparin therapy or in patients with clotting factor deficiencies or in the presence of a lupus anticoagulant), patient plasmas were conveniently diluted in factor V deficient plasma in order to correct clotting factor abnormalities. Nevertheless, patients with a LA and an aPTT ratio range 1.8-3.17 were still all misclassified. We obtained correct diagnoses in LA positive patients by preincubating plasmas with a mixture of phospholipids; therefore we decided to perform a double modified clotting test adding a mixture of platelet derived phospholipids to samples previously diluted in factor V deficient plasma. The performance characteristics of this novel method with a different aPTT reagent (Behring, Germany) were also evaluated. With this double modified test all patients were correctly classified as negative or positive for factor V mutation in agreement with DNA analysis, irrespectfully of the basal aPTT value and the aPTT reagent employed. We propose this modified version of the APCr clotting test as an easily reproducible, reliable, very sensitive and specific screening test which possibly reduces the need for DNA analysis.     

Activated partial thromboplastin time after heparin removal (aPTT/HR) in a new scheme of anticoagulant monitoring

Activated partial thromboplastin time after heparin removal (aPTT/HR), a test employing anion exchange chromatography, was devised as an alternative to the prothrombin time after heparin removal (PT/HR) to monitor simultaneous anticoagulation with heparin and coumarins. The potential utility of the aPTT/HR was assessed by performing parallel PTs and aPTTs on 62 consecutive plasmas from coumarin-treated outpatients. All samples had 0.2 units/ml of heparin added and then removed to see if the maneuver influenced therapeutic group assignment. In no instance did reassignment occur. A conditional Irwin-Fisher test (P = 0.000604) and a special multinomial trial analysis (P = 0.002) indicated that the aPTT would be at least comparable to the PT for following coumarin antithrombotic prophylaxis. Since the heparin removal procedure had no influence on therapeutic categorization, the same statistical proof could be applied to the relationship between aPTT/HR and PT/HR. This study indicates that the aPTT can be used to monitor all stages of heparin and /or coumarin anticoagulation.     

Accuracy of coagulation values obtained from a heparinized central venous catheter

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To compare coagulation values of blood samples drawn from heparinized central venous catheters (CVCs) and peripheral veins. DESIGN: Correlational. SETTING: Adult, acute-care hematology/oncology unit in a 1,000-bed teaching hospital. SAMPLE: Twelve adult patients with cancer who had varied diagnoses and patent CVCs. METHODS: Simultaneous blood samples were drawn from the CVC and a peripheral vein and were tested for prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: PT and aPTT values. FINDINGS: PT and aPTT values were significantly prolonged in samples drawn from CVCs when compared to peripherally drawn samples. CONCLUSIONS: Accurate coagulation values cannot be obtained from a heparinized CVC. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: Blood for coagulation values should be obtained from peripheral veni-puncture. Further research should explore the effects of various catheters, heparin dwell time, and systemic anticoagulation on coagulation values.     

Agreement between face-to-face and telephone-administered mood ratings in patients with rapid cycling bipolar disorder

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Clinical trials have demonstrated that high dose radiation therapy and daily cisplatin (CDDP) could increase local control and survival in carcinoma from various sites. The present phase I-II study has combined high dose radiation therapy and daily CDDP at escalating dosages. METHODS: From August 1994 to December 1995, 23 patients with non-resectable carcinoma of the pancreas were enrolled in a phase I-II multicentric, pilot study to test the toxicity and the effectiveness of high dose radiotherapy and daily cisplatin (CDDP) at escalating dosages. A dose of 6 mg/sqm/day of CDDP was selected for the phase II step since no grade IV toxicity occurred in any patient in the phase I step. RESULTS: Toxicity was considered fairly acceptable. At the time of analysis, the 23 patients who entered the study had clear evidence of evolutive disease either locally or distantly in the liver. It is suggested that high dose radiotherapy (60 Gy continuously) and daily CDDP have little effect on local control of the tumor and survival, and only a moderate effect on pain. CONCLUSIONS: In unresectable, apparently non-metastatic cancers of the pancreas, there is an urgent need for new agents or new combinations of agents to be tested.