Low density polyethylene-polypropylene blends: Part 2 - Strengthening and toughening with copolymer

Abstract

The strengthening and toughening of low density polyethylene (LDPE)-polypropylene (PP) blends with a commercial ethylene/propylene block copolymer (CO) have been investigated. It is shown that the addition of the copolymer improved the ductility of the LDPE-PP blends without any loss of elastic modulus. Particularly for the PP rich LDPE-PP blends, the copolymer can improve the ductility, tensile strength and impact strength simultaneously. It was found that the copolymer has no obvious influence on the crystallisation behaviour of the LDPE and PP phases, whereas the interfacial adhesion was enhanced significantly. The results suggested that the ethylene/propylene block copolymer is a suitable compatibiliser for LDPE-PP blends, which can be used as an effective additive for the recycling of the polyalkene mixtures, especially the PP rich LDPE-PP mixtures.     

Microcellular foaming of PE/PP blends

Three different polyethylene/polypropylene (PE/PP) blends were microcellular foamed and their crystallinities and melt strengths were investigated. The relationship between crystallinity, melt strength, and cellular structure was studied. Experimental results showed that the three blends had similar variation patterns in respect of crystallinity, melt strength, and cellular structure, and these variation patterns were correlative for each blend. For all blends, the melt strength and PP melting point initially heightened and then lowered, the PP crystallinity first decreased, and then increased as the PE content increased. At PE content of 30%, the melt strength and PP melting point were highest and the PP crystallinity was least. The blend with lower PP crystallinity and higher melt strength had better cellular structure and broader microcellular foaming temperature range. So, three blends had best cellular structure at PE content of 30%. Furthermore, when compared with PE/homopolymer (hPP) blend, the PE/copolymer PP (cPP) blend had higher melt strength, better cellular structure, and wider microcellular foaming temperature range, so it was more suited to be microcellular foamed. Whereas LDPE/cPP blend had the broadest microcellular foaming temperature range because of its highest melt strength within three blends. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 104: 4149–4159, 2007     

The Use of Ethylene/Propylene Copolymers as Compatibilizers for Recycled Polyolefin Blends

Compatibilizing effects of ethylene/propylene (EPR) diblock copolymers on the morphology and mechanical properties of immiscible blends produced from recycled low‐density polyethylene (PE‐LD) and high‐density polyethylene (PE‐HD) with 20 wt.‐% of recycled poly(propylene) (PP) were investigated. Two different EPR block copolymers which differ in ethylene monomer unit content were applied to act as interfacial agents. The morphology of the studied blends was observed by scanning‐ (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). It was found that both EPR copolymers were efficient in reducing the size of the dispersed phase and improving adhesion between PE and PP phases. Addition of 10 wt.‐% of EPR caused the formation of the interfacial layer surrounding dispersed PP particles with the occurrence of PE‐LD lamellae interpenetration into the layer. Tensile properties (elongation at yield, yield stress, elongation at break, Young's modulus) and notched impact strength were measured as a function of blend composition and chemical structure of EPR. It was found that the EPR with a higher content of ethylene monomer units was a more efficient compatibilizer, especially for the modification of PE‐LD/PP 80/20 blend. Notched impact strength and ductility were greatly improved due to the morphological changes and increased interfacial adhesion as a result of the EPR localization between the phases. No significant improvements of mechanical properties for recycled PE‐HD/PP 80/20 blend were observed by the addition of selected block copolymers.     

PP/PE blends. IV. Characterization and compatibilization of blends of postconsumer resin with virgin PP and HDPE

The mechanical properties of blends of isotactic polypropylene and high-density polyethylene with a postconsumer resin (recycled dairy containers) were investigated over the entire composition range. Modification of these blends with an ethylene/propylene/diene copolymer or an ethylene/vinyl acetate copolymer was also investigated. Isotactic polypropylene/postconsumer resin blends have satisfactory impact and tensile properties at postconsumer resin contents of less than 50% for certain applications. At higher postconsumer resin contents, the tensile properties were adversely affected. The impact properties remained satisfactory. Addition of an ethylene/propylene/diene copolymer improved the mechanical properties of these blends to levels equal to or greater than those for neat isotactic polypropylene. Ethylene/vinyl acetate copolymers were also able to improve the mechanical properties, but not as efficiently as did the ethylene/propylene/diene copolymer. Blends of high-density polyethylene and a postconsumer resin had poor impact and tensile properties. Although the ethylene/propylene/diene copolymer and ethylene/vinyl acetate copolymers were able to improve these properties, the improvement was insufficient for general recycling, except at lower (≤25%) postconsumer resin contents. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 70: 2081–2095, 1998     

PP/PE熔体流动速率比与共混体系力学性能的关系

选择不同熔体流动速率(MFR)的乙-丙共聚型聚丙烯(PP)和聚乙烯(PE),分别配混出一系列不同熔体流动速率比(R_M=MFR_(PP)/MFR_(PE))的共混体系。深入探讨了共聚PP/PE共混体系的力学性能与PP和PE间R_M的关系。结果表明,在适宜的R_M范围內,PE能对乙-丙共聚型PP具有良好增韧增强效果。在025后,体系性能劣化。     

Compatibilization of PP/PE blends and scraps with Royalene: Mechanical properties,SAXS, and WAXS

PP/PE 93/7 model virgin blends and recycled scraps were compatibilized with Royalene (EPDM/PE 65/35 blend) and mechanically tested. No differences in impact and tensile properties between them were found. However, the tensile-impact strength increased almost twice with 10%-compatibilized sample in comparison with uncompatibilized ones. The yield stress of blends containing 10% Royalene decreased to 75–80% of the original value. This effect is in agreement with microhardness measurements; the increase in the compatibilizer content causes softening of the blend. The elongation at break and elongation at yield do not depend on the compatibilizer concentration. The compatibilizer does not influence the degree of crystallinity (WAXS data) of the blends either. Vickers microhardness is in good agreement with Tabor's relationship. The differences between long periods of HDPE in Royalene and LDPE in PP/PE blends (SAXS) proved PE/EPDM interaction. The interaction plays a key role in the toughening of PP/PE blends. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Compatibilization of polyethylene/poly(propylene)/polystyrene blends

The compatibilization of mixtures of polyolefins or of polyolefins with polystyrene using either liquid polybutadiene (l-PB)/organic peroxide or styrene-butadiene-styrene (SBS) block copolymers was investigated. Tensile impact strength was chosen as a measure of compatibility. Binary blends LDPE/high-impact polystyrene (HIPS) and LDPE/poly(propylene) (PP) as well as LDPE/HDPE/PP/HIPS blends were prepared by blending in the chamber of a Brabender Plasticorder. Composition of the blends corresponds to real commingled plastic waste. It was found that l-PB-based compatibilizer enhanced the impact strength of LDPE/HIPS blends with LDPE contents higher than 60 wt.-% only. Also SBS copolymer enhanced the impact strength of LDPE/PP blends with LDPE contents higher than 40 wt.-%. Both the compatibilizers substantially increased the toughness of LDPE/HDPE/PP/HIPS blends with composition similar to the municipal plastic waste.     

增塑剂对PP/EPR共混体系力学性能的影响

以聚丙烯（PP）为基材,与二元乙丙橡胶（EPR）用熔融共混的方法,制备易开启式输液瓶外盖用料．并加入一定量的低密度聚乙烯（LDPE）和增塑剂以改善体系相容性和力学性能,讨论了增塑剂邻苯二甲酸二辛酯（DOP）、乙酰柠檬酸三正丁酯（ATBC）及丙三醇对共混体系力学性能的影响。研究发现．在m（PP）／m（EPR）=40／60共混体系中加入一定量的增塑剂后,共混体系的拉伸屈服强度与熔体力矩均有所降低,当在PP／EPR中加入一定量的LDPE后,DOP和丙三醇在一定用量内（质量分数〈3％）可以降低体系拉伸屈服强度．在此用量范围内,AT-BC使体系拉伸屈服强度呈先上升后下降的变化趋势。     

PP/UHMWPE共混物力学性能的研究

采用不同结构的聚丙烯(PP)分别与不同流动性能的超高摩尔质量聚乙烯(UHMWPE)进行共混，对共混物的力学性能进行了研究。发现PP和UHMWPE类型的适当匹配对共混物性能的提高非常重要。流动性较好的UHMWPE对熔体质量流动速率较小的嵌段共聚型PP(PPB)增韧增强效果突出，常温缺口冲击强度可达74．2kJ／m^2，断裂伸长率大于700％；同时共混物的强度和刚性也有一定程度的提高。在PPB／UHMWPE二元共混物中加入适当线性低密度聚乙烯(LLDPE)，能够起到“减粘”和“增容”作用，有利于共混物性能，尤其是抗冲性能的进一步提高。     

Toughening and reinforcing of polypropylene

To improve the mechanical properties of polypropylene (PP), some elastomers and fillers are used. The impact properties and tensile strength are affected by both the mineral additives and the polymer additives. There are also some changes in the thermal properties. To improve the interfacial adhesion, some low molecular polymers are added to assist the dispersion of the fillers and the uniformity of the various polymers with PP. The addition of low-density polyethylene (LDPE), high-density polyethylene (HDPE), or the styrene–butylene–styrene block copolymer (SBS) can improve the impact properties of PP. The propylene–ethylene copolymer has a more pronounced effect than does the physical blending of PP with PE. Calcium carbonate can reinforce PP resin. The ethylene–vinyl acetate copolymer (EVA) has an effect on the printing properties of the PP. © 1996 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Effect of ethylene-propylene copolymer with residual PE crystallinity on mechanical properties and morphology of PP/HDPE blends

Morphology and mechanical properties of polypropylene (PP)/high density polyethylene (HDPE) blends modified by ethylene-propylene copolymers (EPC) with residual PE crystallinity were investigated. The EPC showed different interfacial behavior in PP/HDPE blends of different compositions. A 25/75 blend of PP/HDPE (weight ratio) showed improved tensile strength and elongation at break at low EPC content (5 wt %). For the PP/HDPE = 50/50 blend, the presence of the EPC component tended to make the PP dispresed phase structure transform into a cocontinuous one, probably caused by improved viscosity matching of the two components. Both tensile strength and elongation at break were improved at EPC content of 5 wt %. For PP/HDPE 75/25 blends, the much smaller dispersed HDPE phase and significantly improved elongation at break resulted from compatibilization by EPC copolymers. © 1995 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Mechanical Properties and Morphology of Ternary PP/EPDM/PE Blends

The ternary blends of high‐density polyethylene (PE), EPDM terpolymer and polypropylene (PP) have been used as a model low interfacial tension system to study encapsulation dynamics in ternary blends and their relation to the blends' mechanical properties. It was found that the modulus, tensile strength and impact resistance can be improved by PE addition if the PE is localized within the EPDM phase. A range of blend morphology was found depending on the PE viscosity and polymer incorporation sequence in the twin‐screw extruder. In the most favorable sequence, PE and EPDM were mixed together prior to their dispersion in the PP matrix. This practice resulted in a 50% increase in impact resistance when compared to mixing the three components in a single‐step.     

Characterization of polypropylene and ethylene–propylene copolymer blends for industrial applications

The crystalline structure and physico‐mechanical properties of polypropylene (PP) blended with ethylene–propylene copolymer (EPM) were investigated. WAXS diffractograms showed that the addition of EPM did not affect the crystalline structure of PP. DSC curves revealed the presence of two T_g peaks indicating the amorphous phases of EPM and PP. As EPM increased, the elastomeric domains cavitated from PP matrix increased while the tensile stress and modulus of elasticity decreased. Impact strength, on the other hand, increased, and showed a remarkable effect at 30% EPM/PP. The properties of the blended polymers were compared with the commercial PP impact copolymer, and it was found that polyblends containing 30% EPM was suited for applications on products requiring very high impact strength. Further addition of EPM from 40 to 50% produced very high impact strength, but the tensile stress and modulus of elasticity were very low. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 78: 1200–1208, 2000     

Morphology and mechanical properties of biaxially oriented films of polypropylene and HDPE blends

Biaxially oriented films of blends of high-density polyethylene (HDPE) with polypropylene (PP) homopolymer and PP copolymers prepared by twin-screw extrusion and lab-stretcher have been investigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), polarized microscopy, differential-scanning calorimeter, and universal testing machine. Three different kinds of PP copolymers were used: (i) ethylene–propylene (EP) random copolymer; (ii) ethylene–propylene (EP) block copolymer; (iii) ethylene–propylene–buttylene (EPB) terpolymer. In the SEM study of the morphology of films of HDPE with various PP blends, phase separation is observed between the PP phase and the HDPE phase for all blends and compositions. In all blends, HDPE serves to reduce the average spherulites size, probably acting as a nucleating agent for PP. The reduction of spherulite size appeared most significantly in the blend of EPB terpolymer and HDPE. A large increase of crystallization temperature was found in the blend of EPB terpolymer and HDPE compared with the unblended EPB terpolymer. For the blend of EPB terpolymer and HDPE, the improvement of tensile strength and modulus is observed with an increase of HDPE content, and this can be considered as a result of the role of HDPE in reducing average spherulite size. © 1994 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

废旧聚丙烯编织袋回收料改性应用研究

废旧聚丙烯(PP)编织袋回收料分别与回收聚乙烯(PE)、回收橡胶粉、木粉共混,制备了增韧PP材料、热塑性弹性体和木塑复合材料,采用力学性能测试、SEM和DSC分析等手段对其性能和结构进行了表征。结果表明:随着回收聚乙烯(PE)含量的增加,回收PP/PE共混物的拉伸强度和冲击强度迅速提高;回收PP/橡胶粉共混物中加入聚丙烯接枝马来酸酐(PP-g-MAH)能起到增容的效果,随PP-g-MAH含量的增加,共混物的拉伸强度上升,永久变形减小;在回收PP/木粉复合材料中加入PP-g-MAH后,复合材料的冲击强度明显提高。     

Application of phase dispersion–crosslinking synergism on recycling commingled plastic wastes

A tetra‐component blend, consisting of low‐density polyethylene (LDPE), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), polypropylene (PP), and polystyrene (PS), was studied as a model system of commingled plastic wastes (LDPE/PVC/PP/PS, mass ratio: 70/10/10/10). Effects of chlorinated polyethylene (CPE), ethylene–propylene–diene monomer (EPDM), styrene–butadiene–styrene (SBS), and their mixture (CPE/EPDM/SBS, mass ratio: 2/2/2) on the mechanical properties and morphology of the system were investigated. With addition of several elastomers and their mixture, the tensile strength of the blends decreased slightly, although both the elongation at break and the impact strength increased. Among these elastomers, EPDM exhibited the most significant impact modification effect for the tetra‐component blends. SBS and the mixture have a good phase‐dispersion effect for the tetra‐component blend. By adding a crosslinking agent [dicumyl peroxide (DCP)], the mechanical properties of the tetra‐component blends also increased. When either SBS or the mixture was added to the blend together with DCP, the probability that the crosslinking agent (DCP) would be at the interface improved because of the phase‐dispersion effect of SBS. Therefore, more co‐crosslinked products will form between LDPE and other components. Accordingly, remarkable improvement of the interfacial adhesion and hence the mechanical properties of the tetra‐component blends occurred. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 82: 2947–2952, 2001     

LDPE/PP blends modified by peroxide and radiation induced reactions

LDPE/PP polyblends, modified through either peroxide initiated reactions or irradiation, were characterized in terms of rheological and mechanical properties and microstructure. In the presence of peroxide, or through irradiation LDPE crosslinks, PP degrades. Data were obtained at two peroxide concentration levels (0.1 and 1% by weight) and two radiation doses (30 and 100 kGy). The results show that in peroxide modification, the degradation of PP prevails over the crosslinking of LDPE. However, the effect of irradiation of LDPE (crosslinking) is predominant over that of PP (degradation). The irradiation process tends to yield improved mechanical properties vs. peroxide modification for the PP-rich blends. In addition, the melt viscosity and elasticity of the irradiated PP-rich blends are higher than those of the peroxide-reacted blends at a given level of PP content and frequencies between 10 and 100 rad/s. Attempts were made to relate the shape of the rheological curves and the mechanical properties of the blends to the observed changes in their microstructure. © 1994 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Structure and properties of dynamically cured EPDM/PP blends

The structure and properties of polyolefin blends of ethylene–propylene–diene terpolymer (EPDM) and polypropylene were studied. Blends were prepared in a laboratory internal mixer where EPDM was cured with PP under shear with dicumyl peroxide (DCP) at different shear conditions (blend–cure). Blends were also prepared for comparison from EPDM which were dynamically cured in the absence of PP and blended later (cure–blend). The effect of DCP concentration, intensity of the shear mixing, and rubber/plastic composition were studied. In blend–cure, the melt viscosity increased with increasing DCP concentration in blends of 75% EPDM and 25% PP, but it decreased with increasing DCP concentration in blends of 75% PP and 25% EPDM. In cure–blend, however, the melt viscosity increased with increasing DCP concentration for all compositions. The melt viscosity decreased with increasing intensity of the shear mixing presumably due to the formation of the smaller segregated microdomain of the crosslinked EPDM gels in both blend–cure and cure–blend materials. The crystallization rate was higher in EPDM/PP blends than in PP homopolymer. The crystallization rates for various blending conditions were also compared.     

An investigation on recycled PET/PP and recycled PET/PP‐EP compatibilized blends: Rheological,morphological, and mechanical properties

The effectiveness of P(E‐co‐MA‐co‐GMA) as a compatibilizer for recycled PET/PP and recycled PET/PP‐EP (polypropylene (ethylene‐propylene) heterophase copolymer) blends was investigated by means of morphological (scanning electron microscopy), rheological (small amplitude oscillatory shear), mechanical (tensile, flexural and impact tests), and thermal (differential scanning calorimetry) properties. Compatibilizer concentration ranged from 1 to 5 wt % with respect to the whole blend. All blends were obtained in a 90/10 composition using a twin screw extruder. Compatibilization effects for PETr/PP‐EP were more pronounced due to ethylene segments present in both PP‐EP and P(E‐co‐EA‐co‐GMA). PETr/PP‐EP has shown greater dispersed phase size reduction, a more solid‐like complex viscosity behavior and larger storage modulus at low frequencies in relation to PETr/PP blend. For both investigated blends, mechanical properties indicated an improvement in both elongation at break and impact strength with increasing compatibilizer content. PETr/PP‐EP blends showed improved performance for the same level of compatibilizer content. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015 , 132, 41892.     

The effect of interfacial adhesion on the impact strength of immiscible PP/PETG blends compatibilized with triblock copolymers

In this work, recycled Poly(ethylene glycol-co-cyclohexane-1,4-dimethanol terephthalate) plastic (PETG) was used to enhance the properties and lower the cost of polypropylene(PP). In order to adjust the interfacial adhesion, three triblock copolymers having the same styrene block at two ends but different block in the middle, were used a the compatibilizers, namely, styrene–ethylene/butylene–styrene (SEBS), styrene–butadiene–styrene (SBS), styrene–isoprene–styrene (SIS). The ratio of PP to PETG was fixed at 70/30 and the relationship between interfacial adhesion and mechanical properties was investigated. The addition of SIS caused a considerable increase in Izod impact toughness, but only slightly improved toughness was observed for blends compatibilized with SEBS. The effect of SBS on improving the impact toughness lied in between that of SIS and SEBS. SEM micrographs showed that PETG forms a fibrillar-like structure for all the uncompatibilized and compatibilized blends, and the blends compatibilized with SBS have smallest domain size, the blends compatibilized with SEBS have largest domain size, while the ones compatibilized with SIS show a moderate domain size. Results from melt rheometry and SEM observation together with work of interfacial adhesion, indicated a strongest interfacial adhesion in blends compatibilized with SBS, poorest in blends compatibilized with SEBS, and moderate in blends compatibilized with SIS. It is very interesting to found that the much improved impact strength was not observed in the blends with the strongest interfacial adhesion but achieved in the blend with moderate interfacial adhesion. Investigation on the impact fractured surface revealed an easier debonding of fibril from matrix and consequently drawn out of matrix in blends compatibilized by SIS with moderate interfacial adhesion, which was considered as the main reason for the much improved impact toughness in this system.