Arousal-related associative response characteristics of dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus neurons during acoustic Pavlovian fear conditioning.

This research determined whether fear-conditioned, acoustic stimuli induce thalamic arousal reflected in associative responses in dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (dLGN) neurons. Rabbits received a Pavlovian discriminative fear conditioning procedure in which one tone conditioned stimulus (CS+) was always paired with an aversive unconditioned stimulus (UCS) and another tone (CS–) was never paired with the UCS. Responses of single dLGN neurons to random CS+ and CS– presentations were then recorded. Nine of 15 recorded neurons demonstrated significantly greater firing during the CS+ versus the CS–. Their spontaneous activity demonstrated tonic firing during increased neocortical arousal and burst firing during decreased neocortical arousal. The results demonstrate that dLGN neurons show associative responses to fear-conditioned, acoustic stimuli and present a model for investigating the neural circuits by which such stimuli affect sensory processing at the thalamic level. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Frequency-specific receptive field plasticity in the medial geniculate body induced by Pavlovian fear conditioning is expressed in the anesthetized brain.

Fear conditioning modifies the processing of frequency information; receptive fields (RFs) in the auditory cortex and the medial geniculate body (MGB) are altered to favor processing the frequency of the conditioned stimulus/stimuli (CS) over the pretraining best frequency (BF) and other frequencies. This experiment was designed to determine whether brief conditioning in the waking state produces RF plasticity that is expressed under general anesthesia. Guinea pigs bearing electrodes in the MGB received 20 trials on tone-shock pairing in a single training session. RFs were determined with animals under ketamine anesthesia before conditioning and 1–3 hrs and 24 hrs after conditioning. Frequency-specific RF plasticity was evident for both postconditioning periods: The BF shifted toward or to the CS frequency, responses to the BF decreased, and responses to the CS increased. Broadly tuned cells developed greater RF plasticity than narrowly tuned neurons. Results demonstrate that the specific neuronal results of brief learning experiences can be expressed in the anesthetized brain. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Unblocking in Pavlovian fear conditioning.

Six experiments used rats to study blocking and unblocking of fear learning. An excitatory stimulus (A) blocked fear learning to a neutral stimulus (B). Unblocking of B occurred if the AB compound signaled an increase in unconditioned stimulus (US) intensity or number. Assessments of associative change during blocking showed that more was learned about B than A. Such assessments during unblocking revealed that more was learned about B than A following an increase in US intensity but not US number. These US manipulations had no differential effects on single-cue learning. The results show that variations in US intensity or number produce unblocking of fear learning, but for each there is a different profile of associative change and a potentially different mechanism. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Stimulation at a site of auditory-somatosensory convergence in the medial geniculate nucleus is an effective unconditioned stimulus for fear conditioning.

The medial division of the medial geniculate nucleus (MGm) and the posterior intralaminar nucleus (PIN) are necessary for conditioning to an auditory conditioned stimulus/stimuli (CS), receive both auditory and somatosensory input, and project to the amygdala, which is involved in production of fear conditioned responses (CRs). If CS–unconditioned stimulus (UCS) convergence in the MGm-PIN is critical for fear conditioning, then microstimulation of this area should serve as an effective UCS during classical conditioning, in place of standard footshock. Guinea pigs underwent conditioning (40–60 trials) using a tone as the CS and medial geniculate complex microstimulation as the UCS. Conditioning bradycardia developed when the UCS electrodes were in the PIN. However, microstimulation was not an effective UCS for conditioning in other parts of the medial geniculate or for sensitization training in the PIN or elsewhere. Learning curves were similar to those found previously for footshock UCS. Thus, the PIN can be a locus of functional CS–UCS convergence for fear conditioning to acoustic stimuli. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Potentiation and overshadowing in Pavlovian fear conditioning.

The present experiments addressed a fundamental discrepancy in the Pavlovian conditioning literature concerning responding to a target cue following compound reinforced training with another cue of higher salience. Experiment 1 identified one determinant of whether the target cue will be overshadowed or potentiated by the more salient cue, namely contiguity between compound CS termination and US presentation. Overshadowing and potentiation were observed with delay and trace procedures, respectively. Experiments 2 and 3 contrasted elemental and configural explanations of potentiation. Both experiments supported a configural account. Experiments 3 and 4, by manipulating prior learning experiences to bias subjects to encode the same compound elementally or configurally, demonstrated decreased potentiation and overshadowing, respectively. Overall, these experiments demonstrate potentiation with nontaste stimuli and identify one variable that determines whether overshadowing or potentiation will occur. Moreover, they show that prior experiences can determine how a compound is encoded and are compatible with the idea of flexible encoding as a principle of information processing. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Real-time dopamine efflux in the nucleus accumbens core during Pavlovian conditioning.

To assess the role of dopamine input to the nucleus accumbens core in anticipatory learning, fast-scan cyclic voltammetry was combined with appetitive Pavlovian conditioning. One group of rats (Paired) received 16 tone-food pairings for at least four daily sessions while the control group (Unpaired) received the same number of unpaired tone and food presentations. Both groups showed transient dopamine responses during food presentation throughout training, confirming dopamine involvement in reward processing. Only the Paired Group, however, showed consistently timed dopamine transients during the 10-s tone presentation. Transients first appeared near the end of the tone period as each animal acquired the tone-food association and then occurred progressively sooner on subsequent sessions. Later sessions also revealed a consistently timed dopamine response soon after food delivery in Paired animals. Collectively, these results implicate phasic dopamine release in the acquisition of Pavlovian learning and also suggest an early dopamine response to the unconditioned stimulus as training continues. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Two roles of the context in Pavlovian fear conditioning.

At both empirical and theoretical levels, multiple functional roles of contextual information upon memory performance have been proposed without a clear dissociation of these roles. Some theories have assumed that contexts are functionally similar to cues, whereas other views emphasize the retrieval facilitating properties of contextual information. In Experiment 1, we observed that one critical parameter, the spacing of trials, could determine whether the context would function as a conditioned stimulus or as a retrieval cue for memories trained in different phases. Experiments 2 and 3 doubly dissociated these functions by selectively disrupting one role but not the other, and vice versa. Overall, these observations identify one determinant of different functions of contextual information and pose a major challenge to theories of learning that assume exclusively one or the other function of the context. Moreover, these data emphasize the importance of parametric variations on behavioral control, which has critical implications for studies designed to understand the role of the hippocampus in processing of contextual attributes. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Opioid regulation of Pavlovian overshadowing in fear conditioning.

In Pavlovian overshadowing, a stimulus that predicts a biologically important event reduces conditioning to another, equally predictive stimulus. We tested the effects of an opioid antagonist and dopamine agonist on the ability of a salient white noise to overshadow a less salient light. Rats were conditioned to fear a light or a noise–light compound using a mild footshock. Compound-conditioned rats trained under the saline vehicle revealed significant overshadowing of the light by the noise. This overshadowing effect was significantly attenuated in rats trained under the opioid antagonist naltrexone, consistent with an opioid-mediated negative feedback model of conditioning. In line with predictions made by negative feedback-type models, we failed to obtain overshadowing with few trials, suggesting that the processes underlying conditioning during initial trials do not contribute to the opioid-dependent Pavlovian overshadowing obtained in our preparation. Lastly, we compared the involvement of dopamine-mediated and opioid-mediated processes in overshadowing by conditioning rats under the partial dopamine D1 receptor agonist SKF 38393 or the opioid antagonist naltrexone. Both naltrexone and SKF 38393 were found to attenuate overshadowing; however, the behavioral profiles produced by each pharmacological manipulation were distinct. Collectively, these studies demonstrate an important role for both opioid- and dopamine-mediated processes in multiple-trial overshadowing. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Theoretical mechanisms underlying the trial-spacing effect in Pavlovian fear conditioning.

Contemporary explanations of the trial-spacing effect (TSE) were evaluated. Experiment 1 revealed, in rats given tone–footshock trials with 15-, 60-, or 900-s intertrial intervals (ITIs), a direct relationship between freezing to the tone and ITI (the TSE) but an inverted U-shaped relationship between freezing to the training context and ITI. In Experiment 2, footshock preexposure eliminated the TSE that otherwise occurs across 15- to 60-s ITIs but had no effect on the TSE that occurs across 60- to 900-s ITIs. In Experiments 3 and 4, neither (a) increasing posttraining exposure to the training context in rats trained with 60-s ITIs nor (b) reducing between-trial exposure to this context in rats trained with 900-s ITIs influenced freezing to the tone. These findings suggest that the TSE obtained in this research is due to more than 1 mechanism: 1 responsible for the TSE that occurs with ITIs less than ≡60 s and another responsible for the TSE that occurs with ITIs greater than this. Although the perceptual–defensive–recuperative model may correctly describe the former mechanism, none of the theories tested seems to correctly describe the latter. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Opioid receptors in the midbrain periaqueductal gray regulate prediction errors during Pavlovian fear conditioning.

The authors used a within-subject blocking design to study the role of ventrolateral periaqueductal gray (v1PAG) opioid receptors in regulating prediction errors during Pavlovian fear conditioning. In Stage I, the authors trained rats to fear conditioned stimulus (CS) A by pairing it with shock. In Stage II, CSA and CSB were copresented and followed with shock. Two novel stimuli, CSC and CSD, were also copresented and followed with shock in Stage II. CSA blocked fear from accruing to CSB. Blocking was prevented by systemic pretreatment with naloxone. Blocking was also prevented in a dose-dependent and neuroanatomically specific fashion by vlPAG infusions of the μ-opioid receptor antagonist CTAP. These experiments show that v1PAG μ-opioid receptors contribute to Pavlovian fear learning by regulating predictive error. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Learning-induced plasticity in the medial geniculate nucleus is expressed during paradoxical sleep.

Fear conditioning to an acoustic stimulus produces increases in tone-evoked discharges of neurons in the medial division of the medial geniculate nucleus (MG). This study examined the responses of MG neurons to a conditioned tone presented in paradoxical sleep (PS). After 1 session of habituation to a tone, awake rats underwent conditioning in 3 sessions during which the tone was used as the CS preceding a footshock. Control rats received unpaired presentations of tone and shock. The same tone, which never awakened the animal, was presented during PS following each daily session. Responses of MG neurons to the tone in PS were increased after conditioning. This enhancement was as large as that in waking and was manifested earlier after tone onset than in waking. No change appeared after pseudoconditioning. These results demonstrate that associatively induced plasticity in the MG can be expressed during PS. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Single neurons in the medial prefrontal cortex of the rat exhibit tonic and phasic coding during trace fear conditioning.

Trace fear conditioning is a learning task that requires the association of an auditory conditioned stimulus (CS) and a shock unconditioned stimulus (US) that are separated by a 20-s trace interval. Single neuron activity was recorded from the prelimbic and infralimbic areas of the medial prefrontal cortex in rats during trace fear conditioning or nonassociative unpaired training. Prelimbic neurons showed learning-related increases in activity to the CS and US, whereas infralimbic neurons showed learning-related decreases in activity to these stimuli. A subset of prelimbic neurons exhibited sustained increases in activity during the trace interval. These sustained prelimbic responses may provide a bridging code that allows for overlapping representations of CS and US information within the trace fear conditioning circuit. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Conditioned stimulus determinants of conditioned response form in Pavlovian fear conditioning.

Four experiments using barpress conditioned suppression in rats found that tone evoked more freezing (immobility) than did light. Still, tone and light appeared to have similar conditioned value as assessed by suppression in Experiments 1, 2, and 3, and by blocking, second-order conditioning, and overconditioning assays in Experiments 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Experiment 4 arranged for tone to evoke less suppression than light but more freezing. Results suggest that in fear conditioning, the nature of the conditioned stimulus affects the form of conditioned responding (strong vs. weak freezing). This conclusion extends one drawn by P. C. Holland (see record 1977-12147-001) on the basis of his work in appetitive conditioning. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Response rate and reinforcement rate in Pavlovian conditioning.

Four experiments used delay conditioning of magazine approach in rats to investigate the relationship between the rate of responding, R, to a conditioned stimulus (CS) and the rate, r, at which the CS is reinforced with the unconditioned stimulus (US). Rats were concurrently trained with four variable-duration CSs with different rs, either as a result of differences in the mean CS-US interval or in the proportion of CS presentations that ended with the US. In each case, R was systematically related to r, and the relationship was very accurately characterized by a hyperbolic function, R = Ar/(r +c). Accordingly, the reciprocal of these two variables—response interval, I (= 1/R), and CS-US interval, i (= 1/r) – were related by a simple affine (straight line) transformation, I = mi+b. This latter relationship shows that each increment in the time that the rats had to wait for food produced a linear increment in the time they waited between magazine entries. We discuss the close agreement between our findings and the Matching Law (Herrnstein, 1970) and consider their implications for both associative theories (e.g., Rescorla & Wagner, 1972) and nonassociative theories (Gallistel & Gibbon, 2000) of conditioning. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2011 APA, all rights reserved)     

Neuronal activity in the medial prefrontal cortex during Pavlovian eyeblink and nictitating membrane conditioning

The present study assessed Pavlovian eyeblink (EB) conditioning, using tones and periorbital shock as the conditioned and unconditioned stimuli (CS and US), and nictitating membrane (NM) conditioning, using tones and airpuffs as the CS and US. During each experiment, CS-evoked changes in multiple-unit activity (MUA) in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) were recorded. Concomitant heart rate (HR) conditioned responses (CRs) were also recorded. A nonassociative control group received explicitly unpaired presentations of the CS and US in each experiment. Increases in both NM and EB CRs occurred over sessions in the paired, but not the unpaired, groups. Decelerative HR CRs also occurred in the eyeshock, but not the airpuff, group. Although tone-evoked increases in neuronal activity were obtained during 10 initial tone-alone presentations in all groups, this activity habituated over trials. CS-evoked increases in neuronal activity also occurred, but this activity was considerably greater in the group that received periorbital shock as the US. During subsequent extinction trials, decreases in tone-evoked neuronal activity occurred in this group, compared with the previous CS/US paired trials. CS-evoked MUA increases were minimal during all except the pretraining phase of the study in the CS/US unpaired control groups and in the paired airpuff group. These findings show that neuronal activity during associative learning occurs in the mPFC during Pavlovian EB, as well as HR conditioning, but this activity apparently reflects an affective component to learning that is only indirectly related to skeletal conditioning.     

Amygdalar unit activity during three learning tasks: Eyeblink classical conditioning, Pavlovian fear conditioning, and signaled avoidance conditioning.

Neural activity in central and basolateral amygdala nuclei (CeA and BLA, respectively) was recorded during delay eyeblink conditioning, Pavlovian fear conditioning, and signaled barpress avoidance. During paired training, the CeA exhibited robust learning-related excitatory activity during all 3 tasks. By contrast, the BLA exhibited minimal activity during eyeblink conditioning, while demonstrating pronounced increases in learning-related excitatory responsiveness during fear conditioning and barpress avoidance. In addition, the relative amount of amygdalar activation observed appeared to be related to the relative intensity of the unconditioned stimulus and somatic requirements of the task. Results suggest the CeA mediates the Pavlovian association between sensory stimuli and the BLA mediates the modulation of instrumental responding through the assignment of motivational value to the unconditioned stimulus. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Impact of continuous versus intermittent CS-UCS pairing on human brain activation during Pavlovian fear conditioning.

During Pavlovian fear conditioning a conditioned stimulus (CS) is repeatedly paired with an aversive unconditioned stimulus (UCS). In many studies the CS and UCS are paired on every trial, whereas in others the CS and UCS are paired intermittently. To better understand the influence of the CS-UCS pairing rate on brain activity, the experimenters presented continuously, intermittently, and non-paired CSs during fear conditioning. Amygdala, anterior cingulate, and fusiform gyrus activity increased linearly with the CS-UCS pairing rate. In contrast, insula and left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex responses were larger during intermittently paired CS presentations relative to continuously and non-paired CSs. These results demonstrate two distinct patterns of activity in disparate brain regions. Amygdala, anterior cingulate, and fusiform gyrus activity paralleled the CS-UCS pairing rate, whereas the insula and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex appeared to respond to the uncertainty inherent in intermittent CS-UCS pairing procedures. These findings may further clarify the role of these brain regions in Pavlovian fear conditioning. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

The effects of FG7142 on overexpectation of Pavlovian fear conditioning.

Six experiments studied the role of GABAA receptor activation in expression of overexpectation of Pavlovian fear conditioning. After separate pairings of CSA and CSB with shock in Stage I, rats received pairings of the compound AB with shock in Stage II, producing overexpectation of fear. The expression of overexpectation was attenuated, in a dose-dependent manner, by the benzodiazepine partial inverse agonist FG7142. FG7142 had no effect on responding to a CS paired with a low magnitude US or a CS subjected to associative blocking. These results suggest that the negative prediction error generated during overexpectation training may impose a mask on fear rather than erasing the original fear learning. They support claims that overexpectation shares features with extinction. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Naloxone induces multiple effects on aversive Pavlovian conditioning in rabbits.

Five experiments examined the effects of iv naloxone treatment on aversive Pavlovian conditioning of eye-blink and heart-rate responses, and related unconditioned behaviors, in 143 male albino rabbits. Naloxone (NX) treatment before testing attenuated bradycardiac orienting responses to tones used as CSs. NX also attenuated conditioned bradycardia when administered either before or after training sessions, but it potentiated conditioned bradycardia during extinction of discriminative conditioning. NX did not influence acquisition or extinction of discriminative eye-blink conditioning or somatic or cardiac responses to shocks used as UCSs, but it did decrease locomotor activity. NX immediately after training sessions facilitated acquisition of eye-blink responses. It is concluded that NX influences aversive Pavlovian conditioning in more than one way: (a) During training, it appears to alter reception and processing of signals but does not affect subsequent development of somatic responses to the Pavlovian conditioning contingency. (b) After training, NX apparently affects consolidation of both somatic and autonomic conditioning. (c) NX also appears to delay extinction of Pavlovian conditioning; this effect may similarly involve changes in a stimulus-processing mechanism or in memory functions, but it apparently does not involve changes in somatomotor responsivity. (44 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Neuronal plasticity induced by fear conditioning is expressed during paradoxical sleep: Evidence from simultaneous recordings in the lateral amygdala and the medial geniculate in rats.

The lateral amygdala (LA) and its afferent connections from the medial geniculate (MG) play a pivotal role in auditory fear conditioning. The authors evaluated whether those neurons could express in paradoxical sleep (PS) physiological plasticity acquired in waking. After a habituation session, rats received tone–footshock pairings in 3 sessions. After each session, the tone alone was presented during PS episodes. Multiunit activity was simultaneously recorded in the LA and the medial part of the MG. Both in LA and MG, conditioned responses emerged rapidly (within 5 trials), were expressed with short latency (