Observations of the treatment of women in the United States with myocardial infarction: a report from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction-I

BACKGROUND: To determine whether there are sex differences in the demographics, treatment, and outcome of patients with acute myocardial infarction in the United States, data from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction-I from September 1990 to September 1994 were examined. METHODS: The National Registry of Myocardial Infarction-I is a national observational database consisting of 1234 US hospitals in which each hospital submits data from each patient with acute myocardial infarction to a central data collection center. For these analyses, the following variables were examined in 354 435 patients with acute myocardial infarction: demographics; use of medical therapy including thrombolytic agents; use of procedures including cardiac catheterization, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, and coronary artery bypass surgery; length of hospital stay; adverse events (stroke, major bleeding, or recurrent myocardial infarction); and causes of death. RESULTS: In comparison with men, women experiencing acute myocardial infarction in the United States are older, with 55.7% older than 70 years. Women have a higher mortality rate than men even when controlled for age and die less often from arrhythmia but more often from cardiac rupture whether or not thrombolytic therapy is used. Treatment with aspirin, heparin, or beta-blockers is less frequent in women. When thrombolytic therapy is used, women are treated an average of almost 14 minutes later than men and experience a greater incidence of major bleeding. Cardiac catheterization, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, and coronary artery bypass surgery are used less often in women. CONCLUSIONS: Observations from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction-I document important sex differences in demographics, treatment, and outcome of patients with acute myocardial infarction in the United States.     

Pharmacologic profile of survivors of acute myocardial infarction at United States academic hospitals

Optimal drug therapy for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is well described in the medical literature. However, data on the actual pharmacologic management of patients surviving AMI at academic hospitals is unavailable. The purpose of this study was to document treatment profiles in 500 patients surviving AMI at 12 academic hospitals in the United States. These profiles were compared with established guidelines and were evaluated for trends. Overall, thrombolytics (streptokinase > or = tissue-type plasminogen activator) were administered in 29% of the patients, with a greater proportion of patients receiving beta-blockers than calcium channel antagonists in the initial 72 hours (61% vs 40%; p < 0.005) and at discharge (51% vs 35%; p < 0.005). Further, women were less likely than men to receive thrombolytic therapy (odds ratio [OR] = 0.61; confidence interval [CI], 0.54 to 0.69) or beta-blocker therapy within the first 72 hours (OR = 0.61; CI, 0.55 to 0.67) or at hospital discharge (OR = 0.53; CI, 0.48 to 0.58). Overall, improvements could still be made in the number of patients who receive thrombolytic and acute and chronic beta-blocker therapies after AMI, particularly in women. Changes in treatment profiles may be a reflection of the publication of large clinical trials.     

Do "America's Best Hospitals" perform better for acute myocardial infarction?

BACKGROUND: "America's Best Hospitals," an influential list published annually by U.S. News and World Report, assesses the quality of hospitals. It is not known whether patients admitted to hospitals ranked at the top in cardiology have lower short-term mortality from acute myocardial infarction than those admitted to other hospitals or whether differences in mortality are explained by differential use of recommended therapies. METHODS: Using data from the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project on 149,177 elderly Medicare beneficiaries with acute myocardial infarction in 1994 or 1995, we examined the care and outcomes of patients admitted to three types of hospitals: those ranked high in cardiology (top-ranked hospitals); hospitals not in the top rank that had on-site facilities for cardiac catheterization, coronary angioplasty, and bypass surgery (similarly equipped hospitals); and the remaining hospitals (non-similarly equipped hospitals). We compared 30-day mortality; the rates of use of aspirin, beta-blockers, and reperfusion; and the relation of differences in rates of therapy to short-term mortality. RESULTS: Admission to a top-ranked hospital was associated with lower adjusted 30-day mortality (odds ratio, 0.87; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.76 to 1.00; P=0.05 for top-ranked hospitals vs. the others). Among patients without contraindications to therapy, top-ranked hospitals had significantly higher rates of use of aspirin (96.2 percent, as compared with 88.6 percent for similarly equipped hospitals and 83.4 percent for non-similarly equipped hospitals; P<0.01) and beta-blockers (75.0 percent vs. 61.8 percent and 58.7 percent, P<0.01), but lower rates of reperfusion therapy (61.0 percent vs. 70.7 percent and 65.6 percent, P=0.03). The survival advantage associated with admission to top-ranked hospitals was less strong after we adjusted for factors including the use of aspirin and beta-blockers (odds ratio, 0.94; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.82 to 1.08; P=0.38). CONCLUSIONS: Admission to a hospital ranked high on the list of "America's Best Hospitals" was associated with lower 30-day mortality among elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction. A substantial portion of the survival advantage may be associated with these hospitals' higher rates of use of aspirin and beta-blocker therapy.     

ACE inhibitor use is associated with hospitalization for severe hypoglycemia in patients with diabetes. DARTS/MEMO Collaboration. Diabetes Audit and Research in Tayside, Scotland. Medicines Monitoring Unit

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between the use of ACE inhibitors and hospital admission for severe hypoglycemia and to explore the effects of potential confounding variables on this relationship. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The association between the use of ACE inhibitors and the incidence of hypoglycemia is controversial. A recent study reported that 14% of all hospital admissions for hypoglycemia might be attributable to ACE inhibitors. We performed a nested case-control study, using a cohort of 6,649 diabetic patients taking insulin or oral antidiabetic drugs, on the Diabetes Audit and Research in Tayside, Scotland (DARTS) database. From 1 January 1993 to 30 April 1994, we identified 64 patients who had been admitted to Tayside hospitals with hypoglycemia and selected 440 control patients from the same cohort. RESULTS: Hypoglycemia was associated with the use of ACE inhibitors (odds ratio [OR] 3.2, 95% CI 1.2-8.3, P = 0.023), whereas use of beta-blockers and calcium antagonists was not associated with an increased risk of hospitalization for hypoglycemia with ORs of 0.9 (95% CI 0.3-3.3) and 1.7 (95% CI 0.2-2.1), respectively. There were significant differences between case and control patients in type of diabetes treatment, diabetes duration, place of routine diabetes care, and congestive cardiac failure. These differences did not confound the relationship between ACE inhibitors and hypoglycemia (adjusted OR 4.3, 95% CI 1.2-16.0). CONCLUSIONS: The results show that the association between ACE inhibitor therapy and hospital admission for severe hypoglycemia is not explained by these confounding factors. Although ACE inhibitors have distinct advantages over other antihypertensive drugs in diabetes, the risk of hypoglycemia should be considered.     

Outpatient management program of patients with chronic heart failure

Hospitalization of patients with heart failure is often caused by poor adherence to drug therapy, by suboptimal utilization of ACE inhibitors and beta-blockers, and by the lack of systematic monitoring of patients after discharge. The aim of the study is to verify the impact of an outpatient management program on the hospitalization rate and functional status of patients with chronic heart failure. Over a five-year period, 435 patients entered our outpatient management program, which includes adjustment in medical therapy, patient education and visits timed according to the patient's status. Fifty-six percent of the patients were in New York Heart functional class I-II; 74% were male; mean age was 62 +/- 11 years. Heart failure was due to coronary heart disease in 42%, dilated cardiomyopathy in 35%, hypertensive heart disease in 13%, other etiologies in 10%. The following changes in medical therapy were made compared to the period before referral: ACE inhibitors in 88% of the patients vs 70% (p < 0.05), mean dose of enalapril and captopril respectively 18 +/- 6 mg vs 11 +/- 4 mg (p < 0.05) and 89 +/- 28 mg vs 61 +/- 34 mg (p < 0.05); digoxin in 71 vs 70% (NS); furosemide in 90 vs 87%; beta-blockers in 16 vs 6% (p < 0.05); amiodarone in 24 vs 16% (p < 0.05); oral anticoagulants in 22 vs 12% (p < 0.05); calcium channel blockers in 10 vs 16% (p < 0.05). During the follow-up period (35 +/- 11 months), there were 111 hospital admissions compared to 518 during the year before recruitment (p < 0.05). Seventy-two patients died (65 for cardiac causes) and four patients underwent cardiac transplantation. Functional status improved (301 patients in I-II functional class and 56 in III-IV after referral compared to 225 and 132 before referral, respectively). Our results were obtained through adjustment in pharmacological therapy, intensive patient education and therapeutic continuity made possible by our outpatient heart-failure clinic organization. It is likely that the increase in costs due to therapeutic adjustment and to the increase in the number of visits is counterbalanced by the reduced rate of hospital admissions.     

Potential impact of evidence-based medicine in acute coronary syndromes: insights from GUSTO-IIb. Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Arteries in Acute Coronary Syndromes trial

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study to determine whether use of cardiac medications reflects evidence-based recommendations for patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes. BACKGROUND: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research practice guidelines for unstable angina recommend the use of cardiac medications based on evidence from randomized trials. It is unknown whether practitioners in the U.S., Canada and Europe follow these recommendations in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes. METHODS: We studied 7,743 patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes enrolled in the international Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Arteries in Acute Coronary Syndromes trial. The use of aspirin, beta-adrenergic blocking agents, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and calcium channel blocking agents was determined at discharge for all patients and "ideal" patients (those with indications and no contraindications). Using published estimates of relative mortality reductions with these drugs, we calculated the lives that could have been saved at 1 year if discharge medication use had better matched guideline recommendations. RESULTS: Overall, guideline adherence at discharge in "ideal" patients was 85.6% for aspirin, 59.1% for beta-blockers and 51.7% for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. Calcium channel blockers were given to 26.7% of patients with a contraindication to these drugs. These rates were similar across locations of enrollment. Women and older patients less often received aspirin when "ideal," and younger patients more often received calcium channel blockers when they were contraindicated. If medication use had been more evidence-based, 1-year mortality might have been reduced by a relative 22%. CONCLUSIONS: There is significant room for improvement in the use of recommended drugs in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes. Medication use that more closely follows recommendations could reduce mortality in this population.     

What are the trends in cardiovascular pharmacotherapy in recent years in patients after myocardial infarct?

The authors compared the status of pharmacotherapy in 587 patients with myocardial infarction in 1991 according to the MONICA study, in hospitals of six districts in the Czech Republic, age group 25-64 years with data for 1995 assembled by means of questionnaires in 749 patients of the same age group, who were after myocardial infarction in selected spas. Thrombolytic treatment proved quite inadequate in 1988-1993 in six districts of the Czech Republic, although it rose slightly from mere 2.9% in 1988 to 11.1% in 1993. In 1995 25.4% patients with acute myocardial infarction were treated by thrombolytic treatment. Conversely anti-platelet treatment was very satisfactory in 1991 as well as in 1995. Promising was also the increase in treatment with beta-blockers and ACE inhibitors in 1995 as compared with 1991. Also the percentage of patients treated by hypolipidaemic treatment increased in 1995. This work indicates the favourable trends in pharmacotherapy of patients with acute myocardial infarction in the acute stage as well as in patients after myocardial infarction.     

Effect of local medical opinion leaders on quality of care for acute myocardial infarction: a randomized controlled trial

CONTEXT: The effectiveness of recruiting local medical opinion leaders to improve quality of care is poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a guideline-implementation intervention of clinician education by local opinion leaders and performance feedback to (1) increase use of lifesaving drugs (aspirin and thrombolytics in eligible elderly patients, beta-blockers in all eligible patients) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and (2) decrease use of a potentially harmful therapy (prophylactic lidocaine). DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial with hospital as the unit of randomization, intervention, and analysis. SETTING: Thirty-seven community hospitals in Minnesota. PATIENTS: All patients with AMI admitted to study hospitals over 10 months before (1992-1993, N=2409) or after (1995-1996, N=2938) the intervention. INTERVENTION: Using a validated survey, we identified opinion leaders at 20 experimental hospitals who influenced peers through small and large group discussions, informal consultations, and revisions of protocols and clinical pathways. They focused on (1) evidence (drug efficacy), (2) comparative performance, and (3) barriers to change. Control hospitals received mailed performance feedback. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Hospital-specific changes before and after the intervention in the proportion of eligible patients receiving each study drug. RESULTS: Among experimental hospitals, the median change in the proportion of eligible elderly patients receiving aspirin was +0.13 (17% increase from 0.77 at baseline), compared with a change of -0.03 at control hospitals (P=.04). For beta-blockers, the respective changes were +0.31 (63% increase from 0.49 at baseline) vs +0.18 (30% increase from baseline) for controls (P=.02). Lidocaine use declined by about 50% in both groups. The intervention did not increase thrombolysis in the elderly (from 0.73 at baseline), but nearly two thirds of eligible nonrecipients were older than 85 years, had severe comorbidities, or presented after at least 6 hours. CONCLUSIONS: Working with opinion leaders and providing performance feedback can accelerate adoption of some beneficial AMI therapies (eg, aspirin, beta-blockers). Secular changes in knowledge and hospital protocols may extinguish outdated practices (eg, prophylactic lidocaine). However, it is more difficult to increase use of effective but riskier treatments (eg, thrombolysis) for frail elderly patients.     

The 60 Minutes Myocardial Infarction Project. Characteristics on admission and clinical outcome in patients with reinfarction compared to patients with a first infarction

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to evaluate parameters that characterize patients with myocardial reinfarction as compared to patients with a first infarction in clinical practice, and possibly to determine their clinical outcome. METHODS: The 60 minutes Myocardial Project is a German multicentre prospective observational study in which 136 hospitals are participating. Fourteen thousand, nine hundred and eighty consecutive patients with acute Q wave myocardial infarction were included from July 1992 to September 1994. RESULTS: Out of these 14,980 patients, there were 2854 (19%) with reinfarction and 12,126 (81%) with a first infarction. Patients with a reinfarction arrived at the hospital 24 min earlier than patients with a first infarction (pre-hospital delay 156 vs 180 min; P < 0.001); the door-to-needle time with reinfarction was longer (38 vs 30 min; P < 0.001); however, patients with reinfarction were older (69 vs 66 years; P < 0.001), had a lower rate of a diagnostic first ECG (54 vs 71%; P < 0.001) and received thrombolytic therapy less frequently than patients with a first infarction (46 vs 52%; P < 0.001). A low number of patients received primary PTCA ( n = 205) since only a few hospitals offered a primary PTCA service at the time the study was performed. In patients with reinfarction, there were more reasons as to why thrombolytic therapy was not given (24 vs 21%; P < 0.001). Left bundle branch block occurred more frequently in patients with reinfarction (15 vs 8%; P < 0.001). The intra-hospital course in patients with reinfarction was associated with an increase of complications and intra-hospital death (23 vs 15%; P < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS: Although reinfarction patients arrived earlier at hospital than patients with a first infarction, the former received thrombolytic therapy less frequently than the latter. Patients with reinfarction were older, more frequently had a non-diagnostic ECG on admission and had a higher rate of contraindications against thrombolytic therapy.     

Treatment and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction among patients of cardiologists and generalist physicians

BACKGROUND: Both cardiologists and generalist physicians care for patients with acute myocardial infarction, but little is known about their patients' characteristics, treatments, and outcomes. METHODS: We identified attending and consulting physicians, patient characteristics, drugs, procedures, and mortality from clinical and administrative records of 1620 Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 to 79 years who were treated for acute myocardial infarction at 285 hospitals in Texas during 1990. RESULTS: Patients treated by attending cardiologists were younger, had prior congestive heart failure less frequently, and were initially treated in hospitals offering coronary angioplasty or bypass surgery more often than patients treated by attending generalist physicians (for each, P<.004). Adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics, cardiologists were more likely than generalist physicians to prescribe thrombolytic therapy and aspirin (P<.05) but not beta-adrenergic blocking agents (beta-blockers). Cardiologists used coronary angiography and angioplasty more often (P<.003), but not echocardiography or exercise testing. Adjusted 1-year mortality did not differ significantly between patients of attending cardiologists and generalist physicians (odds ratio, 1.01; 95% confidence interval, 0.76-1.35) or between patients of generalist physicians with and without a consulting cardiologist (odds ratio, 0.83; 95% confidence interval, 0.60-1.16). However, patients initially admitted to hospitals offering coronary angioplasty and bypass surgery had lower adjusted 1-year mortality than patients admitted to other hospitals (odds ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.47-0.98). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with generalist physicians, cardiologists used some, but not all, effective drugs more frequently, as well as coronary angiography and angioplasty. Although these differences were not associated with lower adjusted mortality among cardiologists' patients, cardiologists were more likely to treat patients in hospitals with better outcomes. Future studies should identify organizational factors that improve outcomes of myocardial infarction.     

Advances in the medical management of acute coronary syndromes

Many advances in the treatment of acute coronary syndromes have been realized over recent years. In ST elevation myocardial infarction, new aggressive thrombolytic regimens improve early reperfusion and improve survival. The current focus is on bolus thrombolysis, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition, and low-molecular-weight heparin as adjuncts. In unstable angina and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction, two major advances are IIb/IIIa inhibition and low-molecular-weight heparin, each of which significantly improves the outcome of patients and which have just been approved for use by the Food and Drug Administration. Following acute coronary syndromes, cholesterol lowering with statin drugs has a major effect, even in the large group of patients with average cholesterol levels. Use of clopidogrel, a more potent antiplatelet agent than aspirin, appears to decrease recurrent ischemic events, which has highlighted the potential benefits of oral IIb/IIIa inhibitors, which are much more potent antiplatelet agents. An additional focus has been on ensuring that patients actually receive the currently available medications. With a great number of new medical treatments, the outcome of patients with acute coronary syndromes has improved and will continue to improve as we enter the next millennium.     

Use of thrombolytic agents and other drugs in acute myocardial infarction

Data on all patients with acute myocardial infarction who were treated in the ten hospitals in Health region 1 in Norway were extensively analysed over a two month period. Of all the 487 patients 32% received thrombolytic treatment; i.e 36% of those with definite or suspected myocardial infarction on admission. Thrombolytics were withheld, mainly because only 58% of the patients showed ST elevation or bundle branch block on their ECG, and because of a long delay from onset of symptoms to admission to hospital. With increasing age use of thrombolytics decreased, and high age seemed to some degree to act as a contraindication. Relative contraindications such as history of stroke or peptic ulcer contributed modestly to the limited use of thrombolytics. Aspirin was used by 72% of the patients, and either aspirin or anticoagulants in 87%. At six month follow-up 50% used aspirin and 32% warfarin. Betablockers were given to 57% of the patients in hospital, but were not used to any extent in the acute phase of the disease; at six months the proportion of patients on betablockers was about the same. Oral nitrates were used more extensively than betablockers and there is a clear indication that angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors are used increasingly for secondary prevention.     

Evaluation of drug treatment of myocardial infarction in public hospitals of Andalusia. GAUME (Andalusian Group for performance of Studies on Drug Utilization)

BACKGROUND: The management of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has changed over the last decade. The aim of this study was to evaluate the pharmacologic treatment of AMI in the clinical practice, with special emphasis in thrombolytic therapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective drug utilization survey, collecting data from 26 hospitals belonging to the Andalusian Health Service, Spain, during one month period. Pharmacologic treatment in the first 24 h was obtained. RESULTS: Out of 379 patients recruited, 52.8% received thrombolytic therapy, although another 19% could have obtained some benefit from that therapy. Alteplase was the most frequently used thrombolytic (65.5%). The regimen prescribed was mainly that followed in GUSTO Study (45.8%) or double bolus (43.5%). In a high percentage of patients the thrombolytic selection was not made according to the results of the literature. Women and patients older than 75 years were less likely to receive thrombolytic therapy. There was a high utilization of aspirin (89.7%), nitrates (84.4%) and heparin (83.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Thrombolytic therapy was prescribed in a higher percentage of patients than is reported in other trials. In spite of that, thrombolytics should have been used in more patients. As alteplase does not have a definitive benefit over streptokinase, protocol is needed when selecting a thrombolytic agent.     

Drugs causing dyslipoproteinemia

Diuretics and beta-blockers have a strong tendency to affect serum lipids adversely, whereas the peripherally acting alpha-blocking agents consistently result in beneficial effects. Most of the other antihypertensive agents (calcium channel blockers, ACE inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor antagonists, and drugs that act centrally) are lipid neutral. The effect of steroid hormones varies with the drug, dose, and route of administration. In general, androgens lower HDL-C and have a variable effect on LDL-C. The effects of progestins vary greatly depending on their androgenicity, and estrogens are beneficial except when hypertriglyceridemia occurs with oral estrogens. Glucocorticoids raise HDL-C and may also increase triglycerides and LDL-C. Retinoids increase triglycerides and LDL-C and also reduce HDL-C. Interferons can cause hypertriglyceridemia. Following organ transplantation, a dyslipidemia often ensues. This is caused in part by the medications used to prevent rejection (glucocorticoids, cyclosporine, and FK-506) and requires close attention and, in some patients, drug therapy to prevent coronary artery disease.     

Thrombolysis following myocardial infarct. European Secondary Prevention Study

For evaluation of the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction, all cases of ten Zurich hospitals (278, 184 men and 94 women) in the period from 1 January to 31 March 1993 were analyzed retrospectively. 223 patients were released from hospital, 55 died. A follow-up was done 6 months after the patient's discharge by means of a questionnaires to the family doctor (return rate: 65.9%). 48.5% of patients were referred to hospital within the first 6 h. after onset of symptoms, 64% within the first 12 h. 28% (n = 76) of the patients received a thrombolytic therapy, of which 91% (n = 69) got streptokinase and 9% (n = 7) got tissue plasminogen activator. In 81% of the cases the thrombolytic therapy was done within the first hour in hospital, in accumulated 97% of the cases within two hours. In the age group under 65 years (39% of the patients, n = 109), 48 patients received thrombolysis (odds ratio [OR] = 1.0). In the age group between 65 and 74 years (24.5 % of the patients, n = 68), 19 patients received thrombolysis (OR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.42-0.99; p < 0.05), and in the age group over 74 years (36.5% of the patients, n = 101), 9 patients were received thrombolysis (OR: 0.12; 95% CI: 0.05-0.28; p < 0.0001). 31% of the patients (n = 46) received a coronary angiography, 15% (n = 22) had coronary angioplasty, and 11% (n = 1) received coronary bypass surgery. There is evidence that there should be more importance attached to early hospitalization, if acute myocardial infarction is suspected. Thereby age alone should be considered as a contraindication for thrombolytic therapy. The issue of assumed underuse of thrombolytic therapy should be investigated all over Switzerland.     

Drug therapy before coronary artery surgery: nitrates are independent predictors of mortality and beta-adrenergic blockers predict survival

We conducted this study to evaluate whether there is an association between preoperative drug therapy and in-hospital mortality in patients undergoing coronary artery graft surgery. We collected data on 1593 consecutive patients undergoing coronary artery surgery. The relative risk of in-hospital mortality was determined by logistic regression with in-hospital mortality as the dependent variable, and independent variables that included known risk factors and preoperative cardioactive or antithrombotic drug treatment, i.e., age; left ventricular function; left main coronary artery disease; urgent priority; gender; previous cardiac surgery; concurrent cardiovascular surgery; chronic lung disease; creatinine concentration; hemoglobin concentration; diabetes; hypertension; cerebrovascular disease; recent myocardial infarction; prior vascular surgery; number of arteries bypassed; and regular daily treatment with beta-blockers, aspirin within 5 days, calcium antagonists, angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, digoxin, or warfarin. In-hospital mortality was 3.3%. The relative risk of in-hospital mortality (with 95% confidence intervals of the relative risk) associated with the following drug treatments was: nitrates 3.8 (1.5-9.6), beta-blockers 0.4 (0.2-0.8), aspirin within 5 days 1.0 (0.5-1.9), calcium antagonists 1.1 (0.6-2.1), ACE inhibitors 0.8 (0.4-1.5), digoxin 0.7 (0.2-1.8), and warfarin 0.3 (0.1-1.6). We conclude that in-hospital mortality is positively associated with preoperative nitrate therapy and negatively associated with beta-adrenergic blocker therapy. A significant association between in-hospital mortality and the preoperative use of calcium antagonists, ACE inhibitors, aspirin, digoxin, and warfarin was not confirmed. Implications: We examined the association between common drug treatments for ischemic heart disease and short-term survival after cardiac surgery using a statistical method to adjust for patients' preoperative medical condition. Death after surgery was more likely after nitrate therapy and less likely after beta-blocker therapy.     

Effect of indomethacin on the renal response to angiotensin II receptor blockade in healthy subjects

BACKGROUND: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are known to promote sodium retention and to blunt the blood pressure lowering effects of several classes of antihypertensive agents including beta-blockers, diuretics and angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the acute and sustained effects of indomethacin on the renal response to the angiotensin II receptor antagonist valsartan and to the ACE inhibitor enalapril. METHODS: Twenty normotensive subjects maintained on fixed sodium intake (100 mmol sodium/day) were randomized to receive for one week: valsartan 80 mg o.d., enalapril 20 mg o.d., valsartan 80 mg o.d. + indomethacin 50 mg bid and enalapril 20 mg o.d. + indomethacin 50 mg bid. This single-blind study was designed as a parallel (valsartan vs. enalapril) and cross-over trial (valsartan or enalapril vs. valsartan + indomethacin or enalapril + indomethacin). Renal hemodynamics and urinary electrolyte excretion were measured for six hours after the first and seventh administration of each treatment regimen. RESULTS: The results show that valsartan and enalapril have comparable renal effects characterized by no change in glomerular filtration rate and significant increases in renal plasma flow and sodium excretion. The valsartan- and enalapril-induced renal vasodilation is not significantly blunted by indomethacin. However, indomethacin similarly abolishes the natriuresis induced by the angiotensin II antagonist and the ACE inhibitor. CONCLUSIONS: This observation suggests that although angiotensin receptor antagonists do not affect prostaglandin metabolism, the administration of a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug blunts the natriuretic response to angiotensin receptor blockade.