Optimal provision of daytime NPH insulin in patients using the insulin analog lispro

OBJECTIVE: Insulin lispro improves early postprandial blood glucose control but can result in late interprandial hyperglycemia. As an approach to resolving this problem, we performed a randomized, crossover study with four treatment arms, comparing the daytime metabolic profile after either premeal lispro alone or premeal lispro with optimal daytime NPH insulin and with standard human regular insulin. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Twelve C-peptide negative type 1 diabetic patients were studied on four separate study days, at least 7 days apart. On each study day, patients received one of the four study insulin treatments, in random order, with identical meals and snacks. The four treatments were 1) premeal human regular insulin before lunch and supper at unchanged dose; 2) premeal lispro (unchanged dose) at lunchtime and dinner; 3) pre-lunch reduced-dose lispro (70%) before lunch and supper with supplemental lunchtime NPH and with a 6-h interval until dinner; and 4) pre-lunch reduced-dose lispro (70%) before lunch and supper with supplemental lunchtime NPH and with a 8-h interval until dinner. All patients were using their usual premeal plus basal insulin regimen during the period of the study, with human regular insulin before meals and NPH insulin at bedtime. RESULTS: Postprandial blood glucose concentrations (1230-1500) were lower after reduced or usual lispro dose compared with human regular insulin (5.5+/-0.2 and 5.6+/-0.2 vs. 8.2+/-0.5 mmol/l, P < 0.001), with no difference between the lispro doses. However, prepran-Dial (1800) blood glucose levels deteriorated to higher levels after usual-dose lispro alone compared with either human regular insulin (P < 0.05) or reduced-dose lispro plus NPH (P < 0.05) (8.9+/-0.3 vs. 7.1+/-0.8 and 6.4+/-0.4 mmol/l), with no difference between human regular insulin and reduced-dose lispro plus NPH. During the 2 h between the usual and delayed mealtime, blood glucose concentrations remained controlled on lispro plus NPH (2000: 6.5+/-0.4 mmol/l). CONCLUSIONS: Reduced-dose lunchtime lispro plus NPH maintained the improvement in postprandial blood glucose control with no deterioration in interprandial blood glucose control, even up to a late meal.     

Optimization of evening insulin dose in patients using the short-acting insulin analog lispro

OBJECTIVE: A three-way, crossover, open-label, randomized study was designed to compare the evening and night (1800-0800) glycemic control when the evening premeal lispro dose was reduced by 20% and the bedtime basal NPH dose increased by 25%, or when the basal NPH dose was moved to before dinner at 1800, compared with the control arm on standard premeal human regular insulin and pre-bedtime NPH insulin. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 13 type 1 diabetic patients who use a premeal plus basal insulin regimen were studied on three separate days, with identical meals and snacks at the same times on each study day. On the control study day, patients received human regular insulin before dinner and NPH at bedtime in their usual doses. On another day, lispro was given before dinner with a dose reduction of 20%, and NPH at bedtime at 125% of usual dose. In the third regimen, the lispro and NPH were administered together in their usual dose before the evening meal by separate injections. The three regimens were tested in random order. RESULTS: Postprandial (1800-2200) blood glucose concentrations were lower after reduced-dose lispro compared with human regular insulin (6.0 +/- 0.3 [SEM] vs. 7.4 +/- 0.3 mmol/l, P < 0.05). Nighttime (2400-0400) blood glucose concentrations were not different (8.6 +/- 0.3 vs. 9.2 +/- 0.3 mmol/l, NS), and prebreakfast concentrations were also unchanged (7.7 +/- 0.9 vs. 8.7 +/- 0.8 mmol/l) after lispro with increased-dose NPH compared with standard insulin. By contrast, both nighttime (10.0 +/- 0.3 mmol/l, P < 0.05) and fasting glucose concentrations (10.8 +/- 0.6 mmol/l, P < 0.05) were significantly higher with dinnertime usual-dose lispro plus dinnertime usual-dose NPH compared with standard human insulin. Hypoglycemia at night (blood glucose < 3.0 mmol/l) did not differ between study days, but it was more frequent postprandially after dinner usual-dose lispro plus early NPH (2 vs. 7 patients, P = 0.062). CONCLUSIONS: With lower mealtime and higher basal bedtime insulin doses, patients using insulin lispro may be able to gain an overall improvement in evening blood glucose control without deteriorated nighttime glucose levels. Earlier basal NPH dosage alone does not ameliorate the nighttime hyperglycemia of short-acting insulin analog regimens.     

Metabolic efficacy of preprandial administration of Lys(B28), Pro(B29) human insulin analog in IDDM patients. A comparison with human regular insulin during a three-meal test period

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of the rapid-acting Lys(B28), Pro(B29) human insulin analog, insulin lispro, with currently available short-acting human insulin in a multiple injection therapy (MIT) regimen with respect to blood glucose and plasma insulin profiles and to serum metabolites (lactate, free fatty acids, glycerol, and beta-hydroxybutyrate) in 12 well-controlled type 1 diabetic subjects (8 male, HbA1c 6.8 +/- 0.9% [mean +/- SD]). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: After a run-in period of 4 weeks, patients were treated with either lispro at mealtime or human insulin 30 min before the meal for two periods of 4 weeks in a randomized open-label crossover study. Intermediate-acting insulin (NPH insulin) was given at bedtime. At the end of both study periods, metabolic profiles were assessed from 10:00 P.M. to 7:00 P.M. the next day. RESULTS: During the treatment periods, glycemic control was stable during lispro but improved during human insulin (delta HbA1c lispro 0.1 +/- 0.48, NS; human insulin -0.41 +/- 0.34%, P < 0.05). Glucose excursions, as measured by the incremental AUC, during the day and for the 2-h postprandial periods, were lower, although not significantly, for lispro. Insulin profiles demonstrated a faster rise after administration of lispro as compared with human insulin, peaking at 61 +/- 11.9 and 111 +/- 48.1 min (P < 0.01). Glycerol levels showed a slight increase before lunch and dinner, suggestive of enhanced lipolytic activity and compatible with the lower insulin levels. CONCLUSIONS: Lispro insulin applied in an MIT regimen creates more physiologic insulin profiles and tends to lower the glycemic excursions during the day compared with short-acting insulin. The analog can be applied safely in an MIT regimen, with mealtime intervals up to 5 h.     

The action profile of lispro is not blunted by mixing in the syringe with NPH insulin

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of mixing the insulin analog lispro (Humalog) with NPH (Humulin I) before injection on lispro's fast, short action profile. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 12 healthy volunteers received subcutaneous abdominal injections of 0.1 U/kg regular insulin and 0.2 U/kg NPH insulin as follows: lispro and NPH injected separately (treatment group A), lispro and NPH mixed in the syringe up to 2 min before single injection (treatment group B), and human regular insulin and NPH mixed and injected as in group B (treatment group C), on separate occasions, in random order. Plasma glucose was maintained for 12 h by intravenous 20% glucose. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters were compared by analysis of variance for repeated measures. RESULTS: Peak plasma insulin levels (2.6 +/- 0.8 vs. 2.2 +/- 0.6 vs. 1.9 +/- 0.6 ng/ml, P = 0.075), total glucose infused (121.5 +/- 32.8 vs. 135.0 +/- 49.0 vs. 117.3 +/- 39.9 mg.kg-1.min-1, P = 0.53), and maximum glucose infusion rate (GIRmax) (8.3 +/- 0.9 vs. 8.0 +/- 1.7 vs. 7.1 +/- 2.4 mg.kg-1.min-1, P = 0.65) were not significantly different between treatments. The times until peak insulin concentrations were similar in treatment groups A and B, but significantly shorter than in treatment group C (0.9 +/- 0.3 and 1.2 +/- 0.2 vs. 2.0 +/- 0.4 h, respectively, P = 0.042). The times until GIRmax were also not different (113.9 +/- 41 and 122.0 +/- 45 vs. 209.0 +/- 51.3 min, respectively, P = 0.002). The glucose infusion rate (GIR) then fell to 50% GIRmax more quickly in treatment groups A and B than in treatment group C (239.9 +/- 40.5 vs. 292.4 +/- 133.3 vs. 399.5 +/- 78.3, respectively, P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The action profile of lispro is not attenuated by mixing lispro with NPH in the syringe immediately before injection. The advantages are available to those individuals who need to combine types of insulin before injection to achieve optimal diabetes control.     

Long-term recovery from unawareness, deficient counterregulation and lack of cognitive dysfunction during hypoglycaemia, following institution of rational, intensive insulin therapy in IDDM

Hypoglycaemia unawareness, is a major risk factor for severe hypoglycaemia and a contraindication to the therapeutic goal of near-normoglycaemia in IDDM. We tested two hypotheses, first, that hypoglycaemia unawareness is reversible as long as hypoglycaemia is meticulously prevented by careful intensive insulin therapy in patients with short and long IDDM duration, and that such a result can be maintained long-term. Second, that intensive insulin therapy which strictly prevents hypoglycaemia, can maintain long-term near-normoglycaemia. We studied 21 IDDM patients with hypoglycaemia unawareness and frequent mild/severe hypoglycaemia episodes while on "conventional" insulin therapy, and 20 nondiabetic control subjects. Neuroendocrine and symptom responses, and deterioration in cognitive function were assessed in a stepped hypoglycaemia clamp before, and again after 2 weeks, 3 months and 1 year of either intensive insulin therapy which meticulously prevented hypoglycaemia (based on physiologic insulin replacement and continuous education, experimental group, EXP, n = 16), or maintenance of the original "conventional" therapy (control group, CON, n = 5). At entry to the study, all 21 IDDM-patients had subnormal neuroendocrine and symptom responses, and less deterioration of cognitive function during hypoglycaemia. After intensive insulin therapy in EXP, the frequency of hypoglycaemia decreased from 0.5 +/- 0.05 to 0.045 +/- 0.02 episodes/patient-day; HbA1c increased from 5.83 +/- 0.18 to 6.94 +/- 0.13% (range in non-diabetic subjects 3.8-5.5%) over a 1-year period; all counterregulatory hormone and symptom responses to hypoglycaemia improved between 2 weeks and 3 months with the exception of glucagon which improved at 1 year; and cognitive function deteriorated further as early as 2 weeks (p < 0.05). The improvement in responses was maintained at 1 year. The improvement in plasma adrenaline and symptom responses inversely correlated with IDDM duration. In contrast, in CON, neither frequency of hypoglycaemia, nor neuroendocrine responses to hypoglycaemia improved. Thus, meticulous prevention of hypoglycaemia by intensive insulin therapy reverses hypoglycaemia unawareness even in patients with long-term IDDM, and is compatible with long-term near-normoglycaemia. Because carefully conducted intensive insulin therapy reduces, not increases the frequency of moderate/severe hypoglycaemia, intensive insulin therapy should be extended to the majority of IDDM patients in whom it is desirable to prevent/delay the onset/progression of microvascular complications.     

Reduction of postprandial hyperglycemia and frequency of hypoglycemia in IDDM patients on insulin-analog treatment. Multicenter Insulin Lispro Study Group

Insulin lispro, an insulin analog recently developed particularly for mealtime therapy, has a fast absorption rate and a short duration of action. We compared insulin lispro and regular human insulin in the mealtime treatment of 1,008 patients with IDDM. The study was a 6-month randomized multinational (17 countries) and multicenter (102 investigators) clinical trial performed with an open-label crossover design. Insulin lispro was injected immediately before the meal, and regular human insulin was injected 30-45 min before the meal. Throughout the study, the postprandial rise in serum glucose was significantly lower during insulin lispro therapy. At the endpoint, the postprandial rise in serum glucose was reduced at 1 h by 1.3 mmol/l and at 2 h by 2.0 mmol/l in patients treated with insulin lispro (P < 0.001). The rate of hypoglycemia was 12% less with insulin lispro (6.4 +/- 0.2 vs. 7.2 +/- 0.3 episodes/30 days, P < 0.001), independent of basal insulin regimen or HbA1c level. The reduction was observed equally in episodes with and without symptoms. When the total number of episodes for each patient was analyzed according to the time of occurrence, the number of hypoglycemic episodes was less with insulin lispro than with regular human insulin therapy during three of four quarters of the day (P < 0.001). The largest relative improvement was observed at night. In conclusion, insulin lispro improves postprandial control, reduces hypoglycemic episodes, and improves patient convenience, compared with regular human insulin, in IDDM patients.     

Modification of postprandial hyperglycemia with insulin lispro improves glucose control in patients with type 2 diabetes

OBJECTIVE: Insulin lispro is a rapid-acting analog of human insulin that can be used to target the postprandial rise in plasma glucose. We designed an open-label randomized crossover study of type 2 diabetic patients with secondary failure of sulfonylurea therapy to determine whether improvement of postprandial hyperglycemia would affect total daily glucose control. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Twenty-five type 2 diabetic patients who were poorly controlled on a maximum dose of sulfonylureas were studied in a university hospital clinical research center. In one arm of the study, patients continued therapy with maximum-dose sulfonylureas. In the other arm, patients used a combination therapy with insulin lispro before meals and sulfonylureas. After 4 months, patients were crossed over to the opposite arm. Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and 1- and 2-h postprandial glucose (after a standardized meal), HbA1c, total, HDL, and LDL cholesterol, and triglyceride levels were measured at the end of each arm of the study. RESULTS: Insulin lispro in combination with sulfonylurea therapy significantly reduced 2-h postprandial glucose concentrations compared with sulfonylureas alone, from 18.6 to 14.2 mmol/l (P < 0.0001), and incremental postprandial glucose area from 617.8 to 472.9 mmol.min.1-1 (P < 0.0007). FPG levels were decreased from 10.9 to 8.5 mmol/l (P < 0.0001), and HbA1c values were reduced form 9.0 to 7.1% (P < 0.0001). Total cholesterol was significantly decreased in the lispro arm from 5.44 to 5.10 mmol/l (P < 0.02). HDL cholesterol concentrations were increased in the lispro arm from 0.88 to 0.96 mmol/l (P < 0.01). The patients weighed significantly more after lispro therapy than after sulfonylureas alone, but the difference was small in absolute terms (sulfonylurea therapy alone, 90.6 kg; lispro therapy, 93.8 kg; P < 0.0001). Two episodes of hypoglycemia (glucose concentrations, < 2.8 mmol/l) were reported by the patients while using lispro. CONCLUSIONS: Previously, it has not been possible to address the effect of treatment of postprandial hyperglycemia specifically. We have now shown that the treatment of postprandial hyperglycemia with insulin lispro markedly improves overall glucose control and some lipid parameters in patients with type 2 diabetes.     

Randomised placebo-controlled trial of human recombinant insulin-like growth factor I plus intensive insulin therapy in adolescents with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND: Good glycaemic control in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) to prevent complications may be difficult to achieve during adolescence, because abnormalities in production of growth hormone or insulin-like growth-factor-I (IGF-I) can lead to lower insulin sensitivity. Recombinant human IGF-I (rhIGF-I) given as an adjunct to insulin therapy in IDDM, might improve glycaemic control in adolescents; we investigated the effects of the addition of IGF-I in a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. METHODS: 53 patients with IDDM (26 male, 27 female) with a median age of 16.1 years (range 10.8-20.6) and diabetes of more than 2 years' duration were randomly assigned subcutaneous rhIGF-I (20 or 40 microg/kg daily [n=18, n=18, respectively]) or placebo (n=17), both in addition to multiple-injection insulin therapy for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint, glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and routine biochemistry were measured every 4 weeks. Retinal photographs and glomerular-filtration rates were assessed at base line and at the end of the study. Data were analysed by intention to treat. FINDINGS: With a dose of 40 microg/kg rhIGF-I daily, we found significant reductions in HbA1c compared with placebo (p=0.03), without changes in body-mass index, rate of hypoglycaemia, insulin dose, or circulating concentrations of IGF-binding proteins 1 and 3. The greatest median change in HbA1c of -0.6% (range -2.8 to -1.5%) was seen with rhIGF-I 40 microg/kg at week 12, but was not sustained at week 24. The greatest reductions in HbA1c at week 24 were seen among patients with the greatest changes in IGF-I concentrations (r=-0442, p=0.002). Retinal photographs, renal function (glomerular filtration rate and urinary albumin excretion), and routine biochemistry showed no adverse events. INTERPRETATION: Our data confirm that rhIGF-I as an adjunct to insulin therapy can improve HbA1c values in adolescents with IDDM without overt toxic effects, but they raise questions about whether these effects can be sustained in cases of poor compliance or reduced bioefficacy.     

Intensified insulin therapy and the risk of severe hypoglycaemia

The objectives of the present analyses were to assess the association between HbA1c levels and severe hypoglycaemia (SH, treatment with glucose i.v. or glucagon injection) and to identify predictors of SH in a prospective multicentre trial. The study population consisted of 636 insulin-dependent diabetic patients who had participated in a structured 5-day in-patient group treatment and teaching programme for intensification of insulin therapy (ITTP) in one of 10 hospitals and who were re-examined after 1, 2, 3, and 6 years including assessment of demographic, disease and treatment related parameters, diabetes-related knowledge, behaviour, and emotional coping. At baseline, age (mean +/- SD) was 27 +/- 7 years, diabetes duration 9 +/- 7 years and HbA1c 8.3 +/- 1.9 %. During the 6-year follow-up, the mean HbA1c value improved to 7.6%, and in patients with a diabetes duration of more than 1 year at entry into the study (n = 538) the incidence of SH decreased from 0.28 cases/patient/year during the year preceding the ITTP to 0.17 cases/patient/year. The patient group was divided into decile groups according to mean follow-up HbA1c values. In each group more than 230 patient years could be analysed. Groups with mean HbA1c values of 5.7, 7.0, 7.4, 7.7 and 8.9% had comparable risks of SH (0.15-0.19 cases/patient/year). In a logistic regression analysis, mean HbA1c during follow-up, a history of SH during the year preceding the ITTP, C-peptide level, emotional coping, carrying emergency carbohydrates (as assessed at the 1-year follow-up), and age at onset of diabetes were significant independent predictors of SH. The incidence of SH between centres varied between 0.05 and 0.27 cases/patient/year. In conclusion, in the present analyses no linear or exponential relationship between HbA1c and severe hypoglycaemia could be identified by using simple group comparisons. Applying complex regression analyses, various patient-related predictors of severe hypoglycaemia were identified.     

Nighttime insulin kinetics and glycemic control in type 1 diabetes patients following administration of an intermediate-acting lispro preparation

OBJECTIVE: To determine insulin kinetics and overnight glycemic control after bedtime administration of a new intermediate-acting insulin preparation called neutral protamine lispro (NPL). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We studied 12 patients with well-controlled type 1 diabetes. The study had a double-blind, randomized, crossover design. After a lead-in period of 10-14 days two experiments were carried out with an interval of 2-7 days. During these experiments overnight insulin kinetics and fasting blood glucose levels were studied after evening administration of NPH insulin and NPL. Blood glucose levels < 3.8 mmol/l were treated by means of a variable infusion of a 20% glucose solution. RESULTS: A trend toward a shorter time to peak insulin concentration was observed after administration of NPL (P = 0.07). No differences between NPH and NPL were detected in the total area under the curve (AUC) for insulin, in insulin levels before breakfast, or in glucose levels before breakfast (P = 0.5, 0.6, and 0.4, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: We detected no major differences between NPH and NPL in the total AUC for insulin, prebreakfast glucose levels, or prebreakfast insulin levels. Therefore, we conclude that NPH and NPL are equally effective in controlling overnight glycemia.     

Insulin management and metabolic control of type 1 diabetes mellitus in childhood and adolescence in 18 countries. Hvid?re Study Group on Childhood Diabetes

Insulin regimens and metabolic control in children and adolescents with Type 1 diabetes mellitus were evaluated in a cross-sectional, non-population-based investigation, involving 22 paediatric departments, from 18 countries in Europe, Japan, and North America. Blood samples and information were collected from 2873 children from March to August 1995. HbA1c was determined once and analysed centrally (normal range 4.4-6.3%, mean 5.4%). Year of birth, sex, duration of diabetes, height, body weight, number of daily insulin injections, types and doses of insulin were recorded. Average HbA1c in children under 11 years was 8.3 +/- 1.3% (mean +/- SD) compared with 8.9 +/- 1.8% in those aged 12-18 years. The average insulin dose per kg body weight was almost constant (0.65 U kg(-1) 24 h(-1)) in children aged 2-9 years for both sexes, but there was a sharp increase during the pubertal years, particularly in girls. The increase in BMI of children with diabetes was much faster during adolescence compared to healthy children, especially in females. Sixty per cent of the children (n = 1707) used two daily insulin injections while 37% (n = 1071) used three or more. Of those on two or three injections daily, 37% used pre-mixed insulins, either alone or in combination with short- and intermediate-acting insulin. Pre-adolescent children on pre-mixed insulin showed similar HbA1c levels to those on a combination of short- and long-acting insulins, whereas in adolescents significantly better HbA1c values were achieved with individual combinations. Very young children were treated with a higher proportion of long-acting insulin. Among adolescent boys, lower HbA1c was related to use of more short-acting insulin. This association was not found in girls. We conclude that numerous insulin injection regimens are currently used in paediatric diabetes centres around the world, with an increasing tendency towards intensive diabetes management, particularly in older adolescents. Nevertheless, the goal of near normoglycaemia is achieved in only a few.     

Glycosylated hemoglobin and fetal growth in normal, gestational and insulin dependent diabetes mellitus pregnancies

Aims of the study were: evaluation of HbA1c levels in the peripheral blood of pregnant women with insulin dependent diabetes, gestational diabetes, glucose intolerance, and healthy pregnant controls; implications of HbA1c concentration on detection and the control of women with impaired carbohydrate metabolism in pregnancy; comparison of HbA1c levels with appearance of miscarriages, and premature deliveries; comparison of weight gain during pregnancy to HbA1c levels; comparison of difference from ideal body weight with HbA1c in diabetic pregnant women; comparison of neonatal birth weight and HbA1c levels. 290 pregnant women were enrolled to the study. The highest value of HbA1c was in the group IDDM pregnant women (7.7% +/- 1.8%), and the lowest value of HbA1c was in the control group (4.1% +/- 0.5%). Statistically significant coefficients were found between HbA1c and weight gain during pregnancy, between weight deviation from ideal body weight and HbA1c (r = 0.54 and r = 0.48 respectively); and between newborns weight and HbA1c (r = 0.51). Well regulated glycemia and intensive pregnancy follow-up of diabetic women reduces stillbirths, neonatal complications and neonatal macrosomia incidence.     

Comparison of LysB28, ProB29-human insulin analog and regular human insulin in the correction of incidental hyperglycemia

OBJECTIVE: To obtain clinically applicable data on the effects of regular human insulin and the LysB28,ProB29-human insulin analogue (lispro) on the correction of incidental hyperglycemia. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The insulins were compared in a non-clamped randomized crossover study of 27 male IDDM patients. Hyperglycemia was induced by the withdrawal of the normal evening dose of insulin; the next morning patients fasted and received a single dose of study insulin according to a dosing nomogram. Blood glucose concentration and GR (a measure of glucose corrected for differences in administered insulin dose: GR = glucose concentration X BMI X insulin dose-1) were followed for 4 h. RESULTS: The time courses of blood glucose concentration and GR were significantly different after regular insulin in comparison with lispro (multiple analysis of variance, P < 0.001). At t = 120 min, glucose concentrations had decreased 1.4 mmol/l more with lispro than with regular insulin (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.6-2.3, P = 0.002). Similarly, GR had decreased 4.4 mol.kg.IU-1.m-5 more with lispro than with regular insulin (95% CI 2.6-6.2, P < 0.001). The overall difference in glucose values was 0.87 mmol/l (lispro < regular insulin, P = 0.036), and the overall difference in GR values was 1.96 mol.kg.IU-1.m-5 (lispro < regular insulin, P = NS). Unexpectedly, the intrinsic variability of GR was higher for lispro than for regular insulin. CONCLUSIONS: The more rapid action of lispro is an advantage in the correction of hyperglycemia, even though actual differences in glucose concentrations are smaller than suggested by previous clamped studies.     

Effect of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion with lispro on hepatic responsiveness to glucagon in type 1 diabetes

OBJECTIVE: People with type 1 diabetes frequently develop a blunted counterregulatory hormone response to hypoglycemia coupled with a decreased hepatic response to glucagon, and consequently, they have an increased risk of severe hypoglycemia. We have evaluated the effect of insulin lispro (Humalog) versus regular human insulin (Humulin R) on the hepatic glucose production (HGP) response to glucagon in type 1 diabetic patients on intensive insulin therapy with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Ten subjects on CSII were treated for 3 months with lispro and 3 months with regular insulin in a double-blind randomized crossover study After 3 months of treatment with each insulin, hepatic sensitivity to glucagon was measured in each subject. The test consisted of a 4-h simultaneous infusion of somatostatin (450 microg/h) to suppress endogenous glucagon, regular insulin (0.15 mU x kg(-1) x min(-1)), glucose at a variable rate to maintain plasma glucose near 5 mmol/l, and D-[6,6-2H2]glucose to measure HGP During the last 2 h, glucagon was infused at 1.5 ng x kg(-1) x min(-1). Eight nondiabetic people served as control subjects. RESULTS: During the glucagon infusion period, free plasma insulin levels in the diabetic subjects were 71.7+/-1.6 vs. 74.8+/-0.5 pmol/l after lispro and regular insulin treatment, with plasma glucagon levels of 88.3+/-1.8 and 83.7+/-1.5 ng/l for insulin:glucagon ratios of 2.8 and 3.0. respectively (NS). However, plasma glucose increased to 9.2+/-1.1 mmo/l after lispro insulin compared with 7.1+/-0.9 mmol/l after regular insulin (P < 0.01), and the rise in HGP was 5.7 +/-2.8 micromol x kg(-1) x min(-1) after lispro insulin versus 3.1+/-2.9 micromol x kg(-1) x min(-1) after regular insulin treatment (P=0.02). In the control subjects, HGP increased by 10.7+/-4.2 micromol x kg(-1) x min(-1) under glucagon infusion. CONCLUSIONS: Insulin lispro treatment by CSII was associated with a heightened response in HGP to glucagon compared with regular human insulin. This suggests that insulin lispro increases the sensitivity of the liver to glucagon and could potentially decrease the risk of severe hypoglycemia.     

Parental involvement in diabetes management tasks: relationships to blood glucose monitoring adherence and metabolic control in young adolescents with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to identify parental behaviors that relate to adherence and metabolic control in a population of young adolescents with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM), and to understand the interrelationships among the variables of parental involvement, adherence to blood glucose monitoring, and glycemic control. STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional design was used to investigate parental involvement in diabetes regimen tasks in 89 youth, aged 10 to 15 years, with IDDM. Levels of parental involvement in blood glucose monitoring (BGM) and insulin administration were evaluated through interviews. Assessment of adherence was made by physicians or nurses, independent of patient or parent reports of adherence. Glycemic control was assessed with glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) (reference range, 4% to 6%). RESULTS: There were significant differences in the mean HbA1c values between the older (13 to 15 years of age) (HbA1c = 8.9% +/- 1.03%) and younger (10 to 12 years) patients (HbA1c = 8.4% +/- 1.06%) (p < 0.02). Parental involvement in BGM was significantly related to adherence to BGM (number of blood sugar concentrations checked daily) in both groups of adolescent patients. The younger patients monitored their blood glucose levels more frequently than did the older patients, 39% of the younger patients checked sugar concentrations four or more times daily compared with only 10% of the older group (p < 0.007). In a multivariate model controlling for age, gender, Tanner staging, and duration of diabetes, the frequency of BGM was a significant predictor of glycemic control (R2 = 0.19, p < 0.02). Increased frequency of BGM was associated with lower HbA1c levels. When the frequency of BGM was zero or once a day, the mean HbA1c level was 9.9% +/- 0.44 (SE); when the frequency of BGM was two or three times a day, the mean HbA1c level was 8.7% +/- 0.17; and when the frequency of BGM was four or more times daily, the mean HbA1c level was 8.3% +/- 0.22. CONCLUSIONS: Parental involvement in BGM supports more frequent BGM in 10- to 15-year-old patients with IDDM. This increased adherence to BGM is associated with better metabolic control (i.e., lower HbA1c levels). These findings suggest that encouraging parental involvement in BGM with 10- to 15-year-old patients with IDDM may help to prevent the well-documented deterioration in glycemic control and adherence to treatment that often occurs in later adolescence.     

Medication use in diabetes mellitus (VI). Economics and effectiveness of insulin and sulfonyl-urea combination therapy compared with conventional two daily doses

BACKGROUND: To compare the cost and effectiveness of bedtime intermediate-acting insulin and daytime-sulfonylurea (SU) combination therapy versus the conventional two-daily-dose insulin treatment. SUBJECTS, MATERIAL AND METHODS: A pharmacoeconomical analysis of cost minimization. To prove a similar effectiveness a transversal prospective study was carried out. Patients recently converted to insulin due to oral hypoglycaemic agents failure were recruited. Entry criteria were: age > 40 years-old, more than 3 and 1 years of diagnosed diabetes and follow-up, respectively, current BMI between 20-40 kg/m2, baseline HbA1c > 8.5% and fasting C-peptide > 0.3 nmol/l. BMI, HbA1c, hypoglycaemic crisis, insulin and SU (glicazide and glibenclamide) daily dose were recorded, estimating the cost of both therapies. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients (23 male), 32 in combined therapy (mean daily dose of insulin 19.5 U and 2.4 SU tb t.i.d.) and 33 patients with a two-insulin-injection regimen (38.4 U) were treated during a follow-up period of 2.4 years. The two groups exhibited similar mean age (67.8/67.7y), known diabetes duration (15.9/15.1y), BMI (28.9/28.8/kg/m2), previous HbA1c (8.9/9.1%) and fasting C-peptide (1.6/1.2 nmol/l). No statistical differences in BMI increase (1/1.4 kg/m2), neither in mean HbA1c (7.8/7.9%) nor severe hypoglycaemic crisis (0.03/0.17 episodes/year) were evidenced. Patients in combined therapy reported a lower number of mild hypoglycaemic crisis (0.7/1.9 episodes/month; p < 0.01) and the daily cost was significantly lower (94.5/134.3 ptas./day; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Both therapies, two-insulin-injection regimen and insulin and sulfonylurea combination therapy were similarly effective in having an acceptable glycaemic control with similar risk for weight gain or severe hypoglycaemia. Combined therapy was more cost-effective and well-tolerated, thus, comfort and a lower risk of mild hypoglycaemic episodes were evidenced.     

Differential regulation of genes encoding 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) synthase in etiolated pea seedlings: effects of indole-3-acetic acid, wounding, and ethylene

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of the short-acting insulin analog lispro (LP) with that of regular insulin in IDDM patients treated with an external pump. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Thirty-nine IDDM patients (age, 39.4 +/- 1.5 years; sex ratio, 22M/17W; BMI, 24.4 +/- 0.4 kg/m2; diabetes duration, 22.5 +/- 1.6 years) who were treated by external pump for 5.1 +/- 0.5 years were involved in an open-label, randomized, crossover multicenter study comparing two periods of 3 months of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion with LP or with Actrapid HM, U-100 (ACT). Boluses were given 0-5 min (LP) or 20-30 min (ACT) before meals. Blood glucose (BG) was monitored before and after the three meals every day. RESULTS: The decrease in HbA1c was more pronounced with LP than with ACT (-0.62 +/- 0.13 vs. -0.09 +/- 0.15%, P = 0.01). BG levels were lower with LP (7.93 +/- 0.15 vs. 8.61 +/- 0.18 mmol/l, P < 0.0001), particularly postprandial BG levels (8.26 +/- 0.19 vs. 9.90 +/- 0.20 mmol/l, P < 0.0001). Standard deviations of all the BG values (3.44 +/- 0.10 vs. 3.80 +/- 0.10 mmol/l, P = 0.0001) and of postprandial BG values (3.58 +/- 0.10 vs. 3.84 +/- 0.10 mmol/l. P < 0.02) were lower with LP. The rate of hypoglycemic events defined by BG < 3.0 mmol/l did not significantly differ between LP and ACT (7.03 +/- 0.94 vs. 7.94 +/- 0.88 per month, respectively), but the rate of occurrences of very low BG, defined as BG < 2.0 mmol/l, were significantly reduced with LP (0.05 +/- 0.05 vs. 0.47 +/- 0.19 per month, P < 0.05). At the end of the study, all but two (95%) of the patients chose LP for the extension phase. CONCLUSIONS: When used in external pumps, LP provides better glycemic control and stability than regular insulin and does not increase the frequency of hypoglycemic episodes.     

1,5-Anhydro-D-glucitol evaluates daily glycemic excursions in well-controlled NIDDM

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the usefulness of plasma 1,5-anhydro-D-glucitol (1,5-AG) as a possible marker for daily glycemic excursion, we measured plasma 1,5-AG, HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose (FPG) level, and daily excursion of glycemia, from which the M-value (after Schlichtkrull) was calculated as an index of daily glycemic excursion. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The subjects were 76 patients with well-controlled non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) treated with diet therapy only (diet, n = 17), oral hypoglycemic agents (OHA, n = 28), conventional insulin therapy (CIT, n = 16), or multiple insulin injection therapy (MIT, n = 15). RESULTS: HbA1c values were similar among all the groups (diet, 6.9 +/- 0.6; OHA, 7.2 +/- 0.5; CIT, 7.1 +/- 0.6; MIT, 7.2 +/- 0.5%). The MIT group showed a significantly higher 1,5-AG concentration (11.5 +/- 5.3 micrograms/ml), a significantly lower M-value (9.2 +/- 5.2), and little risk of hypoglycemia ( < 4 mmol/l) and hyperglycemia ( > 10 mmol/l) (1.3 +/- 1.1 times/24 h) compared with the CIT group (6.9 +/- 3.3 micrograms/ml, 15.7 +/- 8.9, 2.2 +/- 1.6 times/24 h, respectively). Insulin doses (22.4 +/- 4.5 vs. 22.0 +/- 8.9 U/day), FPG (6.6 +/- 2.2 vs. 7.4 +/- 2.4 mmol/l), and HbA1c concentrations were not significantly different between the CIT and MIT groups. M-values significantly correlated with 1,5-AG concentrations (r = 0.414, P < 0.05), but not with HbA1c concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that the plasma 1,5-AG concentration can be a useful index of the daily excursion of blood glucose, especially in patients with well-controlled NIDDM.     

Double blind clinical and laboratory study of hypoglycaemia with human and porcine insulin in diabetic patients reporting hypoglycaemia unawareness after transferring to human insulin

OBJECTIVES: To compare awareness of hypoglycaemia and physiological responses to hypoglycaemia with human and porcine insulin in diabetic patients who reported loss of hypoglycaemia awareness after transferring to human insulin. DESIGN: Double blind randomised crossover study of clinical experience and physiological responses during slow fall hypoglycaemic clamping with porcine and human insulin. SETTING: Clinical investigation unit of teaching hospital recruiting from diabetes clinics of five teaching hospitals and one district general hospital. SUBJECTS: 17 patients with insulin dependent diabetes mellitus of more than five years' duration who had reported altered hypoglycaemia awareness within three months of transferring to human insulin. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Glycaemic control and frequency of hypoglycaemic episodes during two months' treatment with each insulin. Glucose thresholds for physiological and symptomatic responses during clamping. RESULTS: Glycaemic control did not change with either insulin. 136 hypoglycaemic episodes (eight severe) were reported with human insulin and 149 (nine severe) with porcine insulin (95% confidence interval -4 to 2.5, p = 0.63). 20 episodes of biochemical hypoglycaemia occurred with human insulin versus 18 with porcine insulin (-0.8 to 1, p = 0.78). During controlled hypoglycaemia the mean adrenaline response was 138 nmol/l/240 min for both insulins; neurohormonal responses were triggered at 3.0 (SE 0.2) versus 3.1 (0.2) mmol/l of glucose for adrenaline and 2.5 (0.1) versus 2.5 (0.1) mmol/l for subjective awareness. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that human insulin per se does not affect the presentation of hypoglycaemia or the neurohumoral, symptomatic, and cognitive function responses to hypoglycaemia in insulin dependent diabetic patients with a history of hypoglycaemia unawareness.