Viscoelastic properties of blends of poly(methyl methacrylate) and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) having various acrylonitrile contents

Dynamic viscoelastic properties of blends of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (SAN) with various AN contents were measured to evaluate the influence of SAN composition, consequently χ parameter, upon the melt rheology. PMMA/SAN blends were miscible and exhibited a terminal flow region characterized by Newtonian flow, when the acrylonitrile (AN) content of SAN ranges from 10 to 27 wt %. Whereas, PMMA/SAN blends were immiscible and exhibited a long time relaxation, when the AN content in SAN is less than several wt % or greater than 30 wt %. Correspondingly, melt rheology of the blends was characterized by the plots of storage modulus G′ against loss modulus G″. Log G′ versus log G″ plots exhibited a straight line of slope 2 for the miscible blends, but did not show a straight line for the immiscible blends because of their long time relaxation mechanism. The plateau modulus, determined as the storage modulus G′ in the plateau zone at the frequency where tan δ is at maximum, varied linearly with the AN content of SAN irrespective of blend miscibility. This result indicates that the additivity rule holds well for the entanglement molecular weights in miscible PMMA/SAN blends. However, the entanglement molecular weights in immiscible blends should have “apparent” values, because the above method to determine the plateau modulus is not applicable for the immiscible blends. Effect of χ parameter on the plateau modulus of the miscible blends could not be found. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Compatibility and thermal properties of poly(acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene) copolymer blends with poly(methyl methacrylate) and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile)

The mechanical and heat‐resistant properties of acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene (ABS) binary and ternary blends were investigated. The relationship of compatibility and properties was discussed. The results show that poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and styrene–maleic anhydride (SMA) can improve the thermal properties of conventional ABS. The Izod impact property of ABS/PMMA blends increases significantly with the addition of PMMA, whereas that of ABS/SMA blends decreases significantly with the addition of SMA. Blends mixed with high‐viscosity PMMA are characterized by higher heat‐distortion temperature (HDT), and their heat resistance is similar to that of blends mixed with SMA. For high‐viscosity PMMA, from 10 to 20%, it is clear that blends appear at the brittle–ductile transition, which is related to the compatibility of the two phases. TEM micrographs show low‐content and high‐viscosity PMMA in large, abnormally shaped forms in the matrix. Compatibility between PMMA and ABS is dependent on both the amount and the viscosity of PMMA. When the amount of high‐viscosity PMMA varied from 10 to 20 wt %, the morphology of the ABS binary blends varied from poor to satisfactory compatibility. As the viscosity of PMMA decreases, the critical amount of PMMA needed for the compatibility of the two phases also decreases. SMA, as a compatibilizer, improved the interfacial adhesiveness of ABS and PMMA, which results in PMMA having good dispersion in the matrix. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 85: 2652–2660, 2002     

Kinetics of phase separation of poly(styrene‐co‐methyl methacrylate) and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) blends

The phase behavior and kinetics of phase separation for blends of the random copolymer poly(styrene‐co‐methyl methacrylate) (SMMA) and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (SAN) were studied by using small‐angle laser light scattering. The partially miscible SMMA/SAN blends undergo spinodal decomposition (SD) and subsequent domain coarsening when quenched inside the unstable region. For blends of SMMA and SAN, the early stages of the phase separation process could be observed, unlike a number of other blends where the earliest stages are not visible by light scattering. The process was described in terms of the Cahn–Hilliard linear theory. Subsequently, a coarsening process was detected and the time evolution of q_m at the beginning of the late stages of phase separation followed the relationship q_m∝t^?1/3, corresponding to an evaporation–condensation mechanism. Self‐similar growth of the phase‐separated structures at different timescales was observed for the late stage. Copyright © 2004 Society of Chemical Industry     

Investigation on the miscibility of the blends of poly(methyl methacrylate) and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile)

The miscibility was investigated in blends of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and styrene‐acrylonitrile (SAN) copolymers with different acrylonitrile (AN) contents. The 50/50 wt % blends of PMMA with the SAN copolymers containing 5, 35, and 50 wt % of AN were immiscible, while the blend with copolymer containing 25 wt % of AN was miscible. The morphologies of PMMA/SAN blends were characterized by virtue of scanning electron microscopy and transmission electron microscopy. It was found that the miscibility of PMMA/SAN blends were in consistence with the morphologies observed. Moreover, the different morphologies in blends of PMMA and SAN were also observed. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011     

Blending poly(methyl methacrylate) and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) as composite polymer electrolyte

A blend of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (PSAN) has been evaluated as a composite polymer electrolyte by means of differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, ac impedance measurements, and linear sweep voltammetry (LSV). The blends show an interaction with the Li⁺ ions when complexed with lithium perchlorate (LiClO₄), which results in an increase in the glass‐transition temperature (T_g) of the blends. The purpose of using PSAN as another component of the blend is to improve the poor mechanical properties of PMMA‐based plasticized electrolytes. The mechanical property is further improved by introducing fumed silica as inert filler, and hence the liquid electrolyte uptake and ionic conductivity of the composite systems are increased. Room‐temperature conductivity of the order of 10^?4 S/cm has been achieved for one of the composite electrolytes made from a 1/1 blend of PSAN and PMMA containing 120% liquid electrolyte [1M LiClO₄/propylene carbonate (PC)] and 10% fumed silica. These systems also showed good compatibility with Li electrodes and sufficient electrochemical stability for safe operation in Li batteries. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 80: 1319–1328, 2001     

Polymer blends of stereoregular poly(methyl methacrylate) and poly(styrene‐co‐p‐hydroxystyrene)

Isotactic, atactic, and syndiotactic poly(methyl methacrylates) (PMMAs) (designated as iPMMA, aPMMA, and sPMMA) were mixed with poly(styrene‐co‐p‐hydroxystyrene) (abbreviated as PHS) containing 15 mol % of hydroxystyrene separately in 2‐butanone to make three polymer blend systems. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy were used to study the miscibility of these blends. The three polymer blends were found to be miscible, because all the prepared films were transparent and there was a single glass transition temperature (T_g) for each composition of the polymers. T_g elevation (above the additivity rule) is observed in all the three PMMA/PHS blends mainly because of hydrogen bonding. If less effective hydrogen bonding based on the FTIR evidence is assumed to infer less exothermic mixing, sPMMA may not be miscible with PHS over a broader range of conditions as iPMMA and aPMMA. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 73: 431–440, 1999     

Effect of blend composition and organoclay loading on the nanocomposite structure and properties of miscible poly(methyl methacrylate)/poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) blends

Organically‐modified montmorillonite clay nanocomposites of poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (SAN), poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and SAN/PMMA miscible blend are investigated. Structure characteristics at the nanoscale and microscale and thermal and tensile properties are studied as a function of polymer blend composition and filler loading fraction. Blend miscibility and T_g are unaffected by up to 10% by wt. organoclay. Thermal degradation stability increases with SAN content and exhibits an optimum value of clay loading. Stiffness shows significant improvement. Tensile strength and elongation‐at‐break suffer as a result of nanocomposite formation. Modulus shows a maximum enhancement of 57% (5 ± 0.06 GPa at 10 wt% filler, 20/80 SAN/PMMA) and varies linearly with clay fraction for all compositions of matrix phase. Predictions of Halpin–Tsai composite model are in excellent agreement with the experimental behavior over full range of polymer blend composition. Fundamental aspects of a polymer blend–clay nanocomposite are clarified, such as lack of additional synergy between clay platelets and matrix, and tensile ductility reduction, compared with polymer–clay system. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2011. © 2011 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Effect of tacticity of poly(methyl methacrylate) on the miscibility with poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile)

Isotactic, atactic, and syndiotactic poly(methyl methacrylates) (PMMAs) (designated as iPMMA, aPMMA, and sPMMA) with approximately the same molecular weight were mixed separately with poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (abbreviated as PSAN) containing 25 wt % of acrylonitrile in tetrahydrofuran to make three polymer blend systems. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) was used to study the miscibility of these blends. The results showed that the tacticity of PMMA has a definite impact on its miscibility with PSAN. The aPMMA/PSAN and sPMMA/PSAN blends were found to be miscible because all the prepared films were transparent and showed composition dependent glass transition temperatures (T_gs). The glass transition temperatures of the two miscible blends were fitted well by the Fox equation, and no broadening of the glass transition regions was observed. The iPMMA/PSAN blends were found to be immiscible, because most of the cast films were translucent and had two glass transition temperatures. Through the use of a simple binary interaction model, the following comments can be drawn. The isotactic MMA segments seemed to interact differently with styrene and with acrylonitrile segments from atactic or syndiotactic MMA segments. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 74: 2894–2899, 1999     

Improving the electrical conductivity of ethylene 1‐octene copolymer/cyclic olefin copolymer immiscible blends by interfacial localization of MWCNTs

The localization of multiwall carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) in the immiscible blends of ethylene–1‐octene copolymer (EOC) and cyclic olefin copolymer (COC) with the sea–island morphology and electrical conductivity of resulting nanocomposites were investigated. Depending on the feeding orders, as the MWCNTs were located in the COC droplet, the electrical conductivity was obtained as high as 5.71 × 10^?7 S/cm, while the MWCNTs were located in EOC/COC interface, the electrical conductivity increased significantly up to 1.72 × 10^?2 S/cm. The improved electrical conductivity in EOE/COC/MWCNTs nanocomposite is attributed to the interfacial localization of MWCNTs which is resulted from thermodynamic affinity of MWCNTs to COC, as well as an interconnected structure via deformed and swelled COC droplets. Thermodynamic affinity of MWCNTs to COC and established interconnected structure are confirmed by rheological characterization, microscopic observations, dynamic mechanical analysis, and electrical conductivity measurements. Therefore, as a result of selective localization of MWCNTs and well‐designed phase morphology, lower rheological and especially electrical percolation thresholds could be obtained in the ternary nanocomposites compared to the binary systems. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 59:447–456, 2019. © 2018 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Compatibility and properties of alternating ethylene-tetrafluoroethylene copolymer and poly(methyl methacrylate) blends

Blends of an alternating ethylene-tetrafluorethylene copolymer (ETFE) and poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) were prepared by melt mixing in a mixer. Compatibility, thermal behaviour and morphology of the blends of various compositions were investigated by using dynamic mechanical analysis (d.m.a.), Fourier transform infra-red spectroscopy (FTi.r.), solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (n.m.r.) spectroscopy, differential scanning calorimetry (d.s.c.) and wide-angle X-ray diffraction. D.m.a. and d.s.c. results show that the glass transition temperature (T_g) of the ETFE in the blends increases as the PMMA content increases and the T_g of the PMMA moves to low temperatures when the ETFE content increases. In addition, d.s.c. results indicate an additional T_g, which is located between the T_g of PMMA and that of ETFE. The presence of this additional T_g suggests the existence of one semicrystalline phase and two amorphous phases—an ETFE/PMMA phase and a PMMA-rich phase. D.s.c. results also indicate that the melting temperature of ETFE decreases while the crystallinity of ETFE increases slightly as the PMMA content increases. FTi.r. results show that the absorption peak of the carbonyl group of the PMMA in the blends stays almost at the same position as in the pure component. Solid-state n.m.r. results reveal that the changes in chemical shift of the carbonyl group of PMMA in the blends are less than 0.5 ppm. These results confirm that only weak interactions exist between ETFE and PMMA. X-ray diffraction results reveal that no new crystal forms appear in the blends. © 1997 Elsevier Science Ltd.     

Compatibilization of polymer blends from poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) and polycarbonate by oxazoline modification of poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) in the melt

A good way of achieving compatibility in polymer blends of poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (S/AN) and bisphenol A polycarbonate (PC) is the chemical modification of S/AN in the melt. A catalyzed reaction of the nitrile groups with a substituted 2‐amino alcohol or 2‐amino phenol resulted in a conversion of nitrile groups of 55–75% in 60 min. The introduced heterocyclic structures were ethyl hydroxymethyl oxazoline (EHMOXA) and benzoxazole (BenzOXA), respectively. The use of dibutyltin oxide as a catalyst led to the highest efficiency. The modified polymer was characterized by Fourier transform infrared and NMR spectroscopy, elemental analysis, and reactions with organic acids and anhydrides. The modified S/AN showed good technical compatibility (single glass‐transition temperature) with PC in blends made from solution and from the melt. All blends were characterized with oscillating rheometry and differential scanning calorimetry. Rheological measurements showed that EHMOXA–S/AN reacted with PC and had crosslinked structures, whereas BenzOXA–S/AN showed compatibilization without any (crosslinking) reaction. The melt blends of BenzOXA–S/AN and PC showed a downward shift in the complex viscosity due to the influence of the BenzOXA group. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 90: 2322–2332, 2003     

Natural rubber‐g‐methyl methacrylate/poly(methyl methacrylate) blends

The grafting of the methyl methacrylate (MMA) monomer onto natural rubber using potassium persulfate as an initiator was carried out by emulsion polymerization. The rubber macroradicals reacted with MMA to form graft copolymers. The morphology of grafted natural rubber (GNR) was determined by transmission electron microscopy and it was confirmed that the graft copolymerization was a surface‐controlled process. The effects of the initiator concentration, reaction temperature, monomer concentration, and reaction time on the monomer conversion and grafting efficiency were investigated. The grafting efficiency of the GNR was determined by a solvent‐extraction technique. The natural rubber‐g‐methyl methacrylate/poly(methyl methacrylate) (NR‐g‐MMA/PMMA) blends were prepared by a melt‐mixing system. The mechanical properties and the fracture behavior of GNR/PMMA blends were evaluated as a function of the graft copolymer composition and the blend ratio. The tensile strength, tear strength, and hardness increased with an increase in PMMA content. The tensile fracture surface examined by scanning electron microscopy disclosed that the graft copolymer acted as an interfacial agent and gave a good adhesion between the two phases of the compatibilized blend. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 81: 428–439, 2001     

Thermal properties of blends of poly(hydroxybutyrate‐co‐hydroxyvalerate) and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile)

Thermal properties of blends of poly(hydroxybutyrate‐co‐hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV) and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (SAN) prepared by solution casting were investigated by differential scanning calorimetry. In the study of PHBV‐SAN blends by differential scanning calorimetry, glass transition temperature and melting point of PHBV in the PHBV‐SAN blends were almost unchanged compared with those of the pure PHBV. This result indicates that the blends of PHBV and SAN are immiscible. However, crystallization temperature of the PHBV in the blends decreased approximately 9–15°. From the results of the Avrami analysis of PHBV in the PHBV‐SAN blends, crystallization rate constant of PHBV in the PHBV‐SAN blends decreased compared with that of the pure PHBV. From the above results, it is suggested that the nucleation of PHBV in the blends is suppressed by the addition of SAN. From the measured crystallization half time and degree of supercooling, interfacial free energy for the formation of heterogeneous nuclei of PHBV in the PHBV‐SAN blends was calculated and found to be 2360 (mN/m)³ for the pure PHBV and 2920–3120 (mN/m)³ for the blends. The values of interfacial free energy indicate that heterogeneity of PHBV in the PHBV‐SAN blends is deactivated by the SAN. This result is consistent with the results of crystallization temperature and crystallization rate constant of PHBV in the PHBV‐SAN blends. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 77: 673–679, 2000     

The effect of the addition of poly(styrene‐co‐glycidyl methacrylate) copolymer on the properties of polylactide/poly(methyl methacrylate) blend

The effect of the addition of poly(styrene‐co‐glycidyl methacrylate) P(S‐co‐GMA) copolymer on the properties of melt blended polylactide/poly(methyl methacrylate) (PLA/PMMA) 80/20 (wt %) composition was studied. In the literature high ductility levels were achieved by melt blending PLA with different additives. However, the gained ductility was counter balanced with drastic drops in strength and modulus values. The novelty of this work was the preparation of PLA‐based blends with polylactide content higher than 75 wt % which showed an impact resistance value improvement of about 60% compared with the neat PLA and maintained similar tensile strength and modulus values as well as glass transition temperature to neat PLA. The addition of only 3 pph of copolymer to PLA/PMMA blend improved the impact resistance almost 100%. The chemical reaction between PLA/PMMA blend and P(S‐co‐GMA) copolymer were analyzed by FTIR, rotational rheometry, and GPC/SEC. Phase structure and morphology were studied by Differential Scanning Calorimetry and Scanning Electronic Microscopy. Tensile and impact properties as well as thermal stability were also studied. Results showed that as the amount of copolymer in the blend was increased then higher was average molecular weight and polydispersity index. After the addition of P(S‐co‐GMA) copolymer to the PLA/PMMA blend the impact resistance, elongation at break and thermal stability were improved while tensile strength and elastic modulus remained almost unaltered. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2016 , 133, 43935.     

Nonlinear phase‐separation behavior of poly(methyl methacrylate)/poly(styrene‐co‐maleic anhydride) blends

The nonlinear phase‐separation behavior of poly(methyl methacrylate)/poly(styrene‐co‐maleic anhydride) (PMMA/SMA) blends over wide appropriate temperature and heating rate ranges was studied using time‐resolved small‐angle laser light scattering. During the non‐isothermal process, a quantitative logarithm function was established to describe the relationship between cloud point (T_c) and heating rate (k) as given by T_c = Alnk + T₀, in which the parameter A, reflecting the heating rate dependence, is much different for different compositions due to phase‐separation rate and activation energy difference. For the isothermal phase‐separation process, an Arrhenius‐like equation was successfully applied to describe the temperature dependence of the apparent diffusion coefficient (D_app) and the relaxation time (τ) of the early stage as well as the late stage of spinodal decomposition (SD) of PMMA/SMA blends. Based on the successful application of the Arrhenius‐like equation, the related activation energies could be obtained from D_app and τ of the early and late stages of SD, respectively. In addition, these results indicate that it is possible to predict the temperature dependence of the phase‐separation behavior of binary polymer mixtures during isothermal annealing over a range of 100 °C above the glass transition temperature using the Arrhenius‐like equation. © 2012 Society of Chemical Industry     

Effects of tetramethylpolycarbonate‐block‐poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) copolymers containing various amounts of acrylonitrile on the interfacial properties of polycarbonate and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) blends

Tetramethylpolycarbonate‐block‐poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (TMPC‐block‐SAN) block copolymers containing various amounts of acrylonitrile (AN) were examined as compatibilizers for blends of polycarbonate (PC) with poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (SAN) copolymers. To explore the effects of block copolymers on the compatibility of PC/SAN blends, the average diameter of the dispersed particles in the blend was measured with an image analyzer, and the interfacial properties of the blends were analyzed with an imbedded fibre retraction technique and an asymmetric double‐cantilever beam fracture test. Reduction in the average diameter of dispersed particles and effective improvement in the interfacial properties was observed by adding TMPC‐block‐SAN copolymers as compatibilizer of PC/SAN blend. TMPC‐block‐SAN copolymer was effective as a compatibilizer when the difference in the AN content of SAN copolymer and that of SAN block in TMPC‐block‐SAN copolymer was less than about 10 wt%. Copyright © 2004 Society of Chemical Industry     

Synthesis and thermal properties of poly(methyl methacrylate)‐poly(L‐lactic acid)‐poly(methyl methacrylate) tri‐block copolymer

Poly(methyl methacrylate)‐poly(L ‐lactic acid)‐poly(methyl methacrylate) tri‐block copolymer was prepared using atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP). The structure and properties of the copolymer were analyzed using infrared spectroscopy, gel permeation chromatography, nuclear magnetic resonance (¹H‐NMR, ¹³C‐NMR), thermogravimetry, and differential scanning calorimetry. The kinetic plot for the ATRP of methyl methacrylate using poly(L ‐lactic acid) (PLLA) as the initiator shows that the reaction time increases linearly with ln[M]₀/[M]. The results indicate that it is possible to achieve grafted chains with well‐defined molecular weights, and block copolymers with narrowed molecular weight distributions. The thermal stability of PLLA is improved by copolymerization. A new wash‐extraction method for removing copper from the ATRP has also exhibits satisfactory results. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2012     

Effect of poly(styrene‐co‐maleic anhydride) imidization on the miscibility and phase‐separation temperatures of poly(styrene‐co‐maleic anhydride)/poly(vinyl methyl ether) and poly(styrene‐co‐maleic anhydride)/ poly(methyl methacrylate) blends

The objective of this work was to study the miscibility and phase‐separation temperatures of poly(styrene‐co‐maleic anhydride) (SMA)/poly(vinyl methyl ether) (PVME) and SMA/poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) blends with differential scanning calorimetry and small‐angle light scattering techniques. We focused on the effect of SMA partial imidization with aniline on the miscibility and phase‐separation temperatures of these blends. The SMA imidization reaction led to a partially imidized styrene N‐phenyl succinimide copolymer (SMI) with a degree of conversion of 49% and a decomposition temperature higher than that of SMA by about 20°C. We observed that both SMI/PVME and SMI/PMMA blends had lower critical solution temperature behavior. The imidization of SMA increased the phase‐separation temperature of the SMA/PVME blend and decreased that of the SMA/PMMA blend. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Thermal and mechanical properties of poly(methyl methacrylate) and ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer blends

A series of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) blends have been prepared with different compositions viz., 5, 10, 15, and 20 wt % ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) copolymer by melt blending method in Haake Rheocord. The effect of different compositions of EVA on the physico‐mechanical and thermal properties of PMMA and EVA copolymer blends have been studied. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) has been employed to investigate the phase behavior of PMMA/EVA blends from the point of view of component specific interactions, molecular motions and morphology. The resulting morphologies of the various blends also studied by optical microscope. The DSC analysis indicates the phase separation between the PMMA matrix and EVA domains. The impact strength analysis revealed a substantial increase in impact strength from 19 to 32 J/m. The TGA analysis reveals the reduction in onset of thermal degradation temperature of PMMA with increase in EVA component of the blend. The optical microscope photographs have demonstrated the PMMA/EVA system had a microphase separated structure consisting of dispersed EVA domains within a continuous PMMA matrix. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 2007     

Study of polymer blends of poly(acetylene) with poly(methyl methacrylate) and methyl methacrylate-butadiene-styrene copolymer

Summary Electroactive polymer blends of polyacetylene (PA) with poly (methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) or methyl methacrylate-butadien-styrene (MBS) copolymer were prepared in situ as free-standing films or powders by polymerization of acetylene in the presence of PMMA or MBS-copolymer, using Luttinger's catalyst. Blends of different composition were studied by infrared spectroscopy and electrical conductivity measurements. Environmental stability of pristine and doped PA was improved to some extent in the presence of PMMA.