共查询到19条相似文献,搜索用时 46 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
水力喷射射孔效果初探 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
用理论分析和计算的方法对常规聚能射孔与工艺与水力喷射射孔工艺进行了评价对比。根据水力喷射射孔的渗流及假设条件与分支水平井基本一致的特点,利用分支水平井产能分析方法,对水力喷射射孔的产能效果进行了研究,并对影响其效果的因素进行了分析和讨论。研究结果认为,这两种射孔工艺对产能的影响基本一致,且孔深和孔密对其产能的影响较大;射孔效果方面,水力喷射射孔要好于常规聚能射孔,尤其是射孔难度较大的井和重点井,采用水力喷射射工艺会有较大;射孔效果方面,水力喷射孔要好于常规聚能射孔,尤其是射孔难度较大的井和重点井,采用水力喷射射孔工艺会有更好的产能效果,但使用过程中工艺,费用较高,可作为聚能射孔工艺的补充。 相似文献
4.
5.
6.
磨料射流射孔增产技术研究与应用 总被引:5,自引:2,他引:5
介绍了磨料射流射孔机理、参数影响规律室内试验和油井射孔现场试验结果。研究表明,磨料射流射孔过程可分为脆性和延展性材料切割两个不同阶段,并得出了主要参数(包括压力、排量、磨料类别、磨料粒度、磨料体积分数、围压和岩石性质等)对射孔深度的影响规律和合理的参数范围。在地面模拟试验井,24~27MPa压力条件下射孔和割缝深度达0.50m以上;10口井11井次现场施工证明,磨料射流射孔工艺技术降低破裂压力5~10MPa,油井增产效果明显。 相似文献
7.
8.
为了进一步认识水力喷砂射孔机理,检测水力喷砂射孔成孔的形态和孔深,考察岩性、排量和喷射时间等参数对水力喷砂射孔的影响,了解裂缝起裂特征,开展了水力喷砂射孔孔道形态研究。完成了露头岩样靶件和水泥靶件的设计与制作,优选了实验参数和配套工具,并完成了喷砂射孔实验和喷砂射孔起裂实验。为了获得真实、直观的孔形结构,配套专用切割工具完成了靶件的解剖、测绘。实验结果表明,水力射孔形成的孔道深度远低于前期室内实验所得出的深度;水力喷砂射孔孔道形态主要为正常射孔靶件的准纺锤形喷孔和正常起裂的纺锤形—剑形组合喷孔两种形态;水力射孔形成的两个喷孔在形态上几乎对称;当靶件起裂后,喷孔深度成倍增加,同时起裂靶件不同方向上喷孔形态和深度不一样。 相似文献
9.
针对孤岛油田薄层稠油注气压力高、注水井污染严重、转注聚后吸聚能力下降、外围油田非均质严重、低渗等特点,孤岛采油厂引进了水力喷砂射孔技术。经过在不同地区的应用,取得了较好的效果。本文简要介绍水力喷砂射孔的研究以及现场的应用效果,以利推广应用。 相似文献
10.
11.
磨料射流射孔技术的工作原理是利用机械冲顶、磨铣或者水力冲击的方式在套管上形成水射流通道,然后利用高压水射流冲蚀地层,从而在地层中形成具有一定深度和孔径的油气渗流通道。研究了长庆油田的地质与水力压裂状况,并根据磨料射流射孔的技术状况设计了磨料射流射孔压裂一体化工具。通过对油井实施磨料射流射孔压裂一体化操作,在地层中形成了具有高渗透能力的通道。利用该工具可节省作业时间,降低生产成本。 相似文献
12.
Surface Experiment of Abrasive Water Jet Perforation 总被引:5,自引:0,他引:5
This article presents the experiment process and results of abrasive water jet perforation. This experiment was conducted in Kalamayi, China, Xinjiang Oilfield in October 2004. Referring to explosive perforation experiment, we made two cement cylinder samples with a diameter of 2.4 m, 1.2 m high, putting a 139.7 mm (5-1/2') and a 177.8 mm (7') casing sub in them, respectively. The two cylinders were buried underground. During the experiment, we changed the following parameters: blasting time, nozzle diameter, and cement cylinder property. After experiment, we opened the cylinder and found that, compared with explosive perforation, the hole on the casing wall and the tunnel in the cement were much rounder and bigger than with that method. In addition, it can cause a fracturing effect, possibly forming micro-fractures on the tunnel wall. This effect can avoid forming impermeable crushed zone when using explosive perforating. 相似文献
13.
Abstract This article presents the experiment process and results of abrasive water jet perforation. This experiment was conducted in Kalamayi, China, Xinjiang Oilfield in October 2004. Referring to explosive perforation experiment, we made two cement cylinder samples with a diameter of 2.4 m, 1.2 m high, putting a 139.7 mm (5-1/2″) and a 177.8 mm (7″) casing sub in them, respectively. The two cylinders were buried underground. During the experiment, we changed the following parameters: blasting time, nozzle diameter, and cement cylinder property. After experiment, we opened the cylinder and found that, compared with explosive perforation, the hole on the casing wall and the tunnel in the cement were much rounder and bigger than with that method. In addition, it can cause a fracturing effect, possibly forming micro-fractures on the tunnel wall. This effect can avoid forming impermeable crushed zone when using explosive perforating. 相似文献
14.
This article presents a new technology of abrasive water jet perforation assisting fracturing on Well Zheng 408-8, Bin Nan Production Plant, Shengli Oilfield. First, the balsting tool, with 9 nozzles, was lowered down to the payzone and perforated 90 tunnels with abrasive water jet after being moved upward 9 times. Then the fracture work was conducted and 18 m3 sands were squeezed into the formations. After that the well production reached 11.6 t/d liquid and 8.7 t/d oil, respectively, and this continued for 9 months. But before the job, nothing was produced from this well. 相似文献
15.
Abstract This article presents a new technology of abrasive water jet perforation assisting fracturing on Well Zheng 408-8, Bin Nan Production Plant, Shengli Oilfield. First, the balsting tool, with 9 nozzles, was lowered down to the payzone and perforated 90 tunnels with abrasive water jet after being moved upward 9 times. Then the fracture work was conducted and 18 m3 sands were squeezed into the formations. After that the well production reached 11.6 t/d liquid and 8.7 t/d oil, respectively, and this continued for 9 months. But before the job, nothing was produced from this well. 相似文献
16.
17.
18.
The Productivity-Enhancing Technique of Deep Penetrating Perforation With a High-Pressure Water Jet 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
L. Gensheng H. Zhongwei N. Jilei C. Riji X. Wei 《Petroleum Science and Technology》2007,25(3):289-297
Deep penetrating perforation with a high-pressure water jet is an emerging advanced technique for enhancing oil well productivity because of its high cutting, breaking, and cleaning capabilities. Based on the analysis of productivity impairment caused by drilling fluid invaded zone and conventional charge perforating compacted zone, production-enhancing mechanisms of deep penetration perforating with a high-pressure water jet have been comprehensively investigated. The three major aspects are rock cutting with a high-pressure and high-velocity water jet, relieving the stress concentration of the near-wellbore region, and penetrating through the damaged zone. In addition, the feasibility of improving formation fracturing and acidizing treatment by using this technique is also discussed, along with future development and application. 相似文献
19.
应用磨料射流切割技术切除海上采油多层废弃井口时,面临的一个突出问题是切割外层套管和隔水管时喷距变大引起作业时间增加,导致作业成本高昂。基于缩短喷距的思路,设计了一种可变喷距磨料射流多级切割头,切割头上布置有固定喷嘴和长、短伸缩杆喷嘴,每种喷嘴具有相互独立的供液流道,因此切割头可提供3种工作模式,即固定喷嘴切割模式、短伸缩杆切割模式和长伸缩杆切割模式。施工作业时,采用投球的方式依次进行3种工作模式的转换。理论计算表明,使用φ3 mm喷嘴时,长、短伸缩杆工作模式可分别将无因次喷距减小至使用固定喷嘴时的1/27与1/16.7,有效提高了射流的能量利用率。地面试验表明,可变喷距多级切割头使用方便,流道转换可靠,比普通固定喷嘴式切割头切割效率显著提高,可大幅度缩短作业时间,降低作业成本。 相似文献