Buspirone augmentation of antidepressant therapy

Thirty outpatients meeting DSM-III-R or DSM-IV criteria for major depression, single or recurrent episode, and failing to respond to an adequate trial of an antidepressant (>6 weeks at recommended dosage) received buspirone (20-30 mg/day) for 4 or 5 weeks in addition to their existing antidepressant. Of the 22 patients who had buspirone added to their selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressant regimen (fluoxetine, paroxetine, or citalopram), 59% (13/22) showed complete or partial remission of their depressive symptomatology. Similarly, 63% (5/8) of patients treated with buspirone in addition to clomipramine showed complete or partial remission. The mean score on the Clinical Global Impressions Scale fell by 64% (from 4.7 to 1.7; p < 0.0001) in treatment responders (complete and partial). No serious side effects were observed during combination therapy. Seventy-nine percent (11/14) of initial responders (both complete and partial) who remained on augmentation therapy for at least 4 months were symptom-free at follow-up. Buspirone augmentation may produce marked clinical improvement in depressed patients who are initially unresponsive to standard antidepressant therapy.     

Paroxetine. A review of its pharmacology, therapeutic use in depression and therapeutic potential in diabetic neuropathy

Paroxetine is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor effective in a once-daily administration regimen in the treatment of depression. In elderly patients (aged > or = 60 years) with major depression, short term (6 weeks) treatment with paroxetine produces clinical improvements significantly superior to those seen with placebo and similar to those with tricyclic antidepressant agents, mianserin and fluoxetine. There is evidence that paroxetine has positive effects on co-existing anxiety and does not precipitate agitation. Paroxetine has also shown potential in the symptomatic treatment of diabetic neuropathy; however, further clinical experience is needed to confirm this preliminary result. Short term paroxetine therapy is associated with fewer anticholinergic and CNS adverse effects, but generally more gastrointestinal disturbances, than tricyclic antidepressants and mianserin. Unlike the tricyclic agents, paroxetine does not significantly affect cardiovascular function or impair psychomotor performance. This tolerability profile should be particularly beneficial in elderly patients, who are generally more susceptible than younger patients to the anticholinergic and CNS adverse events associated with tricyclic antidepressant drugs, and in whom there is a higher prevalence of pre-existing cardiovascular disease. It also suggests an important potential advantage over tricyclic antidepressants in the setting of overdosage. Thus, primarily because of its better tolerability profile and potentially lower toxicity in overdosage and in patients with cardiovascular disease, paroxetine appears to be a more attractive option than tricyclic antidepressants for the treatment of depression in late life. Future research should attempt to define more fully the efficacy of paroxetine as long term prophylactic therapy for recurrent depression and to assess how its overall therapeutic profile compares with other selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in the elderly.     

Fluoxetine

Fluoxetine was developed as an antidepressant drug. It is more effective than placebo, but a dose-effect relation has not been established. Fluoxetine is almost as effective as tricyclic antidepressant drugs, but the available studies do not allow accurate comparisons. Fluoxetine may be less effective than tricyclic antidepressant drugs for the treatment of inpatients with severe melancholic depression, and it should not be the first choice of a drug for them. Fluoxetine may be most appropriate for patients with moderate depression who can be treated as outpatients. If there is little improvement after treatment for four to six weeks, an alternative treatment should be offered. Fluoxetine does not have the anticholinergic, hypotensive, and sedative effects of tricyclic antidepressant drugs and has no particular cardiovascular effects; overdoses do not cause serious toxic effects. Nausea, anorexia, insomnia, and nervousness--the most common side effects--may be controlled with a careful adjustment to the dose. Clinically important drug interactions may occur with monoamine oxidase inhibitors, tricyclic antidepressant drugs, and other drugs. The published data on the antidepressant effect of fluoxetine do not fully explain its popularity. One may speculate that fluoxetine has psychobiologic effects not strictly related to the biology of depression and that it acts primarily as a mood- or affect-modulating agent.     

Alternative approaches to refractory depression in bipolar illness

Thus, there appears to be a large variety of approaches to refractory bipolar depression. In contrast to several decades ago, wherein augmentation of lithium with antidepressants and neuroleptics was essentially the only treatment mode available, a panoply of treatment options now exist. However, their relative efficacy in different illness subtypes and stages remains to be better delineated, as do their optimal sequencing and use in combination in individual patients. It is the opinion of these authors and many of our colleagues in the field that initial use of several mood stabilizer drugs in combination may have a preferable long-term outcome in some rapid cycling patients, compared with the immediate use of a unimodal antidepressant with an inadequate single mood stabilizer, although this remains to be systematically studied. The use of thyroid augmentation strategies would appear to have merit in relationship to not only the potential treatment of lithium-related hypothyroidism, but also in augmenting antimanic and antidepressant effects. As one moves toward some of the complex combination treatment strategies discussed in this chapter, one has to be particularly careful about drug interactions and their potential for toxicity as well as therapeutic effects. Perhaps a prevailing guideline would be to use these agents more carefully in combination therapy than in monotherapy, with slow upward titration of dose to individual patients' side effects thresholds, even in preference to targeting of conventional blood level windows. In this way, side effects can be avoided during the assessment of complex combination regimens. In addition, one should be aware of potential pharmacokinetic interactions. For example, with the addition of valproate to carbamazenine, one should reduce the dose of carbamazepine, as valproate will not only increase the free fraction of carbamazepine based on displacement of protein binding, but will lead to increased accumulation of carbamazepine-10,11-epoxide. This epoxide is not measured in conventional assays but could contribute to the side effects profile (Ketter and Post, 1994). Similarly, valproate will markedly increase blood levels of lamotrigine; the starting dose of this agent should be substantially lower than conventional dosage when these two drugs are used in combination. We suggest the utility of detailed mapping with a formal system-such as the Life Chart Methodology (LCM) (Leverich and Post, 1996)-of mood fluctuation vs. medications in order to optimize and rationalize complex combination therapy. In this way, not only can the nuances of partial response be better defined, but also basic decisions about the therapeutic index and relative likelihood of response can be more readily assessed. We have discussed the other merits of the life chart method as an important clinical treatment tool as well as a research tool in other venues, but reemphasize its potential great importance in the treatment of refractory cyclic bipolar patients, in whom an initial period of remission of depression may, in many instances, be as likely attributable to the natural course of illness as the current intervention being offered. As such, it behooves the clinician to have a systematic database for the more subtle issues of dose titration and sequential addition of medications in complex combination regimens. In the face of inefficiency to one combination strategy, how one moves to the next strategy remains a highly individualized, clinically-based algorithm. We suggest the potential utility of moving towards a new set of mood stabilizers and then repeating some of the unimodal antidepressant additions and augmentation trials in an attempt to overcome refractory depression. Refractory depression in bipolar patients should be viewed as a medical emergency in light of the high potential for suicide in the illness in general (Chen and Dilsaver, 1996) and in patients who have either sustained or episodic refracto     

Perforated duodenal ulcer: an alternative therapeutic plan

An alternative plan for the treatment of a perforated duodenal ulcer is proposed. We will focus on the now-recognized role of Helicobacter pylori in the genesis of the majority of duodenal ulcers and on the high rate of success of therapy with a combination of antibiotics and a proton-pump inhibitor or histamine2 blocker in treatment of such ulcers. Knowledge that half the cases of perforated duodenal ulcer may have securely sealed spontaneously at the time of presentation is incorporated in the therapeutic plan. Patients with a perforated duodenal ulcer who have already been evaluated for H pylori and are not infected or, if infected, have received appropriate therapy should undergo an ulcer-definitive operation if they are suitable surgical candidates. Most authorities recommend surgical closure of the perforation and a parietal cell vagotomy. The remaining patients should have a gastroduodenogram with water-soluble contrast medium. If the perforation is sealed, the patient can be treated nonsurgically. If the perforation is leaking, secure surgical closure of the perforation is necessary. Following recovery from the immediate consequences of the perforation, evaluation for H pylori should be conducted. If the patient is infected, combined medical therapy is recommended. If the patient is not infected, Zollinger-Ellison syndrome should be ruled out and medical therapy is recommended if the ulcer has not been treated previously. Elective ulcer-definitive surgery should be considered for the occasional uninfected patient who has already received appropriate medical therapy for the ulcer.     

Genotoxicity of hydrazino-phtalazine antihypertensive drugs assessed by an in vitro micronucleus assay

Oral anticoagulant therapy is effective antithrombotic treatment for several indications. The results of prothrombin time monitoring should be reported as the International Normalized Ratio (INR). An INR of 2 to 3 is the recommended therapeutic range for all indications except for the prevention of systemic embolism in patients with mechanical heart valves and for the long-term treatment of patients with myocardial infarction, for whom an INR range of 2.5 to 3.5 is recommended. Oral anticoagulant therapy with warfarin sodium is the preferred approach for preventing stroke in most patients with atrial fibrillation. The available data suggest that warfarin is more effective than aspirin. Aspirin, 325 mg/d, is indicated for patients in whom warfarin is contraindicated or in patients less than 75 years of age who are at low risk for stroke because risk factors are absent. In patients 75 years of age or more, close monitoring of warfarin treatment is prudent to avoid major bleeding due to poor anticoagulant control. In selected patients, patient-self-monitoring and adjustment of warfarin treatment using a portable prothrombin time monitor may be effective and safe.     

Treatment of depression in bipolar disorder: new directions for research

The objective of the study was to review the clinical literature on the acute, somatic treatment of the depressed phase of bipolar disorder. We reviewed all available published studies of "standard" somatic treatments (lithium, antidepressant and anticonvulsant agents, and electroconvulsive therapy [ECT]) reporting three or more depressed bipolar patients who were not psychotic, rapid cycling, or previously treatment refractory. We also reviewed all studies of "nonstandard" pharmacologic treatments involving even a single case of a depressed bipolar patient. Data sources included the MEDLINE database and relevant references from articles obtained in this search and in major reviews. Five of seven studies comparing ECT with antidepressant agents find ECT more efficacious. Eight of nine controlled comparisons find lithium superior to placebo in depressed bipolar patients. Three controlled comparisons of lithium to tricyclic antidepressants suggest that lithium is equivalent to tricyclic drugs in such patients. Three double-blind, controlled studies indicate that carbamazepine is more effective than placebo. Limited data on other antidepressant classes suggest that monoamine oxidase inhibitors, bupropion, and serotonergic agents may offer some advantages over tricyclic antidepressants in this population. Some "nonstandard" treatments also show some potential in bipolar patients. The possibility of switching into a manic episode is an important consideration with many of the agents studied, although little remains known about spontaneous versus treatment-associated mood shifts. In contrast to the extensive literature on the acute treatment of the manic phase of bipolar disorder and on the prophylaxis of manic and depressive episodes, there are few studies of treatment of the depressed phase of bipolar disorder, and their results generally are limited or inconclusive. Lithium generated a revolution in psychiatric treatment, but the treatment of the depressed phase of bipolar disorder remains a relatively neglected corner of the field. Several study designs may help to augment knowledge in the treatment of bipolar depression.     

An active-control trial of lamotrigine monotherapy for partial seizures

OBJECTIVE: We report the results of a double-blind, double-dummy, active-control study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lamotrigine (LTG) administered as monotherapy to adult outpatients with partial seizures. BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of LTG as add-on therapy for partial seizures in adults has previously been established. METHODS: After an 8-week baseline during which patients continued their baseline antiepileptic drug (carbamazepine or phenytoin monotherapy), 156 patients were randomly assigned to receive increasing doses of LTG (target 250 mg b.i.d.) or valproic acid (VPA; target low dose of 500 mg b.i.d.) during the first 4 weeks of an 8-week transition period. Carbamazepine or phenytoin was withdrawn over the next 4 weeks; then patients entered a 12-week monotherapy period. Study drug treatment was discontinued in patients who met predetermined escape criteria for seizure worsening. RESULTS: More patients receiving LTG were successfully maintained on monotherapy compared with patients receiving VPA (56% versus 20%; p < 0.001). The time to meet the escape criteria was also significantly longer in LTG-treated patients (median = 168 days) than in VPA-treated patients (median = 57 days; p = 0.001). The incidence of adverse events during the monotherapy period was lower than during the transition period. Four LTG patients and five VPA patients reported serious adverse events. Two of those patients experienced a rash that led to withdrawal soon after adding LTG to carbamazepine. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that LTG is effective and well tolerated when administered as monotherapy in adult patients with partial seizures.     

ECT in the elderly

Depression is a common clinical problem in the elderly. Risk factors in this population include genetic vulnerability, psychosocial losses, medical comorbidity, cerebrovascular disease, and neurodegenerative disorders. Depression in the elderly may have severe consequences, including high rates of suicide, malnutrition or dehydration, high utilization of medical services, impaired recovery from medical illnesses, and inappropriate placement in residential care facilities. A significant number of older depressed patients may not respond to anti-depressant medications, suffer intolerable medication side effects, or have illnesses with symptoms or consequences so severe that it is not feasible to wait the time required for one or more antidepressant trials to work. For many of these patients ECT can be a dramatically effective treatment. With appropriate evaluation and monitoring, ECT can be performed with relative safety even for patients with serious concurrent medical illnesses. Serious adverse effects are rare, and cognitive consequences of ECT are generally circumscribed and of limited duration; there is no evidence of "brain damage" or permanent change in cognitive ability from ECT. After a recovery period memory function is often better than it was during the episode of depression. For patients who have been refractory to or intolerant of medication, maintenance ECT can be an effective strategy for preventing early relapse. Further research is needed, however, to clarify the optimum use of MECT schedules and pharmacotherapy combinations to most effectively and safely prevent relapse of depression in different elderly populations and to help predict who will best respond to which treatment modalities.     

Therapeutic dilemmas: balancing the risks of bleeding, thrombosis, and leukemic transformation in myeloproliferative disorders (MPD)

With these uncertainties, which patients with ET and PV should receive myelosuppressive therapy and accept its possible risks? Remembering the generalization from the literature that most patients with ET who are to have a catastrophic thrombosis either have it at the time of diagnosis or after preceding, less severe thrombotic symptoms, it is acceptable to omit myelosuppressive therapy in asymptomatic patients with ET. Young patients with PV and no thrombotic manifestations can similarly be managed with phlebotomy alone. There is no evidence in the literature to show that myelosuppressive therapy should be used simply because the platelet count is high or to prevent transition to myeloid metaplasia. In patients with ET or PV with previous thrombotic manifestations, the risk/benefit ratio probably favors myelosuppressive therapy. The PVSG studies also suggest that patients over the age of 70 with PV are at particular risk for thrombosis and should be treated with myelosuppression. No myelosuppressive agent has been shown to be superior to hydroxyurea. Patients who fail on hydroxyurea should not be treated with 32P or alkylating agents. Anagrelide or interferon would be more appropriate. The PVSG-05 study suggests that high doses of aspirin, i.e. approximately 1.0 grams per day, are not indicated. Trials of low dose aspirin to prevent thrombosis are encouraged. There is no way to predict which patients will have hemorrhagic complications and, as mentioned, one study suggests that there will be few (44). Patients with thrombocytosis and pathological bleeding, i.e. hemorrhagic thrombocythemia, generally improve with myelosuppressive therapy. This syndrome is to be distinguished from patients who bleed with normal or low platelet counts, generally in the setting of myeloid metaplasia (14). These patients have an acquired disorder of platelet function due to platelet production from abnormal megakaryocytes. An occasional patient will benefit from increasing the platelet count by splenectomy.     

Gemcitabine and other new chemotherapeutic agents for the treatment of metastatic bladder cancer

An improved quality of life secondary to reduced chemotherapy toxicity is an important end point in the treatment of all patients with metastatic cancer. In this review, we have demonstrated that gemcitabine and gemcitabine/cisplatin combinations appear to have a reduced toxicity profile compared with MVAC. Phase II studies with gemcitabine and cisplatin have shown good response rates that are possibly equivalent to MVAC, and a Phase III trial is now completed. Similar data have been reported for the paclitaxel/carboplatin combination and a Phase III trial comparing that combination with MVAC is planned. For patients with TCC who are in mild renal failure or who have significant underlying medical conditions, gemcitabine can also be considered as a reasonable single agent therapy. Complete responses can be seen, even in patients who are older than the age of 70. Moore et al., for example, demonstrated near complete responses to gemcitabine monotherapy in 4 patients older than 80 years of age. In conclusion, chemotherapy options for patients with metastatic bladder cancer have changed significantly with the addition of gemcitabine and other drugs to the armentarium. The integration of gemcitabine into the initial chemotherapy plan for these patients is still being developed. It is clear that this agent should be included in the management discussions of all patients with metastatic bladder cancer.     

Pathology of MEN-1: morphology, clinicopathologic correlations and tumour development

Augmentation therapy is used for those situations where a patient's depression is either treatment-resistant, or partially and/or insufficiently responsive to treatment. It also may be used to attempt to induce a more rapid treatment response. Using drugs together may increase the risk of adverse effects, through potentiation of existing adverse effects or alterations in plasma concentrations of the drug. It is important that clinicians are aware of potential risks of augmentation therapy. Lithium augmentation of a tricyclic antidepressant is relatively well tolerated and the dangers are no greater than using these medications on their own. There are also no reports of serious adverse events when lithium is added to a monoamine oxidase inhibitor. With lithium augmentation of selective serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT) reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) therapy there have been case reports of the development of a central serotonin syndrome, and thus caution must exercised. A serious concern when using a tricyclic antidepressant to augment an SSRI is the effect of the SSRI on the cytochrome P450 system and the resulting significant increase in tricyclic antidepressant blood concentrations. Augmentation with thyroid hormones appears to be well tolerated and effective. Case reports and open studies indicate that augmentation with buspirone and the psychostimulants, carbamazepine and valproic acid (valproate sodium) is effective and results in minimal adverse effects. However, there is no empirical evidence supporting these results. Recent work supports the tolerability and efficacy of pindolol augmentation. Considerable caution should be exercised when combining psychotropic drugs. The practitioner should only do so with a full knowledge of the compounds involved and their pharmacological properties.     

Success and constraints in the implementation of WHO guidelines for the management of diarrhoea in Albania

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolic disease is a recurring reason for death, it is often well-known but sometimes misunderstood. The right treatment for this pathology should not follow one approach only, but several strategies with respect to the seriousness and extension of the several clinical pictures. In particular the pharmacological therapy tries to find the balance between risks and benefits. It is well-known that a weak treatment may cause an increase in the risk of the pathology extension or of recurrence; on the other hand, a therapy exceeding the well known ranges exposes to important hemorrhagic risk. METHODS: This work presents the personal seven years' experience in patients affected by limb venous thrombosis, in some cases combined with pulmonary embolism. For all patients the pathology seriousness has been assessed by echoduplex scanner and angio-CT, and routine serum electrolite and enzymes analysis and blood counts have been carried out. Different therapies have been investigated, their evolution over the years (on the basis of international and personal experience) and the follow-ups. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The foudamental implications of this experience are: the more remarkable use of vena cava filters do not improve clinical findings' follow-up. On the contrary, it can cause the extension of pathology; heparin therapy must start early and the therapeutic range must be reached as soon as possible. Any delay, together with immobilization, can cause the extension of the pathology; diagnosis research cannot stop at the acuity moment but it should study also the etiopathogenetic picture. This affects the future therapeutic strategy in the follow-up; fibrinolitic therapy, once recommended for extended femoral-iliac thrombosis, should be used for serious levels of the same pathology and only for patients with low haemorrhage risk, or for patients affected by periodic pulmonary thromboembolism which may compromise haemodynamic system.     

The NLM and Grateful Med: promise, public health, and policy

OBJECTIVE: To characterize a clinical syndrome that occurs in some women who have undergone breast or axillary lymph node biopsy or partial mastectomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Six case reports are presented, the clinical and histopathologic findings are described, and the implications for recognition of this entity are discussed. RESULTS: Patients who had undergone partial mastectomy, breast biopsy, or axillary lymph node excision shortly thereafter had clinical signs (most notably, erythema and edema) suggestive of infectious mastitis or inflammatory breast cancer. Representative histologic sections of involved skin revealed dilated dermal vessels without specific evidence of infection or cancer. Although antibiotic therapy was generally ineffective, the clinical findings resolved with time (from 2 months to 1 year). This condition should be considered in the differential diagnosis when this circumscribed patient population has such intervention-related symptoms. CONCLUSION: This clinical syndrome may mimic an infectious or neoplastic process, but we hypothesize that it is due to interruption of lymphatic vessels. Appropriate recognition may alter the use of antibiotic therapy or surgical intervention.     

An international randomized study with long-term follow-up of single versus combination chemotherapy of multibacillary leprosy

A total of 307 patients with lepromatous leprosy and borderline lepromatous leprosy were randomized to dapsone monotherapy or to one of two types of drug combinations. A 3-year treatment phase was followed by a 5-year observation phase. The evaluation included 233 patients for whom together there were 1,404 years of observation. A total of 1,956 blinded histopathological specimens were processed centrally. When entering the trial isolates from 13 patients (5.6%) showed dapsone resistance in the mouse footpad test, and these patients were evaluated separately. Dapsone monotherapy (68 patients) had the same frequency of cure as the combination of dapsone and rifampin (77 patients) or the four-drug regimen consisting of dapsone, rifampin, isoniazid, and prothionamide (75 patients). We did not find a significant difference in the clearance of bacteria either between the monotherapy and the two-drug combination or the monotherapy and the four-drug combination. Six months after the initiation of treatment, disease in 15% of the patients who received dapsone monotherapy but none of the patients who received combined treatment were clinically progressive. After another 1 to 9 months of treatment the disease in all patients was stable or regressive. There was no difference in the type or frequency of reactions. Only after the end of the scheduled observation phase three relapses were reported. All three treatment regimens well tolerated. Dapsone monotherapy is highly effective in the treatment of multibacillary leprosy under the conditions of well-controlled treatment. Combination regimens seem only to accelerate the regression of the active disease when they are compared with monotherapy with dapsone. The mouse footpad test does not reflect the clinical resistance and cannot be recommended for use in making therapeutic decisions.     

Mammographic changes after hormone replacement therapy in patients who have undergone breast irradiation

OBJECTIVE: We examined three patients who began hormone replacement therapy after lumpectomy and breast irradiation. In these women increased tissue density appeared on mammography only or disproportionately in the nonirradiated breast. To our knowledge, this observation has not been reported. CONCLUSION: Breast irradiation may induce tissue changes that prevent or diminish the proliferative response that can be induced in breast tissue by postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy. Because this treatment is now recommended for some women after breast conservation therapy, mammographers may recognize this finding with increasing frequency.     

Testicular cancer

The following article provides a comprehensive review of male germ cell tumors; the pathology and the clinical manifestations of the tumors are discussed, as are the modern concepts of clinical staging. Patients with bulky stage II and stage III non-seminomatous germ cell tumors are treated with chemotherapy. The new international classification system has provided a very useful way to categorize these patients by prognosis. Patients with good- or intermediate-risk tumors may be treated with 3 courses of cisplatin, etoposide, and bleomycin (BEP) or 4 courses of etoposide and cisplatin (EP), and more than 90% of these patients will survive. Randomized trials have shown that, if only 3 courses of chemotherapy are to be given, the substitution of carboplatin for cisplatin and the omission of bleomycin are deleterious to outcome. Patients who still have a significant residual mass and normal markers after treatment should undergo a surgical resection of the residual tumor. Patients who are classified by the international classification system as having poor-risk tumors have about a 50% likelihood of survival, and many of these patients will require surgical resection of a residual tumor after chemotherapy. No randomized trial has proved a regimen to be superior to that of 4 courses of BEP. Currently, an ongoing trial is evaluating the effect of the early use of high-dose therapy in combination with hematopoietic rescue in patients with these types of tumors. Patients with small-volume stage II tumors are generally treated with retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND). About 25% of the patients selected for this procedure will actually have pathologically negative nodes. Those with positive nodes may elect to receive adjuvant chemotherapy (2 courses of BEP), which will almost always prevent relapse. An alternate approach for patients willing to comply with monthly follow-up is surveillance, with chemotherapy deferred until relapse is noted. About 50% of these patients will be cured with surgery (as many as 75% have microscopic disease only). With careful follow-up, those destined to relapse can be treated promptly and at a time when they have small-volume tumors and an excellent prognosis if they go on to receive chemotherapy. Patients with clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumors may also undergo RPLND, although an acceptable alternative for these patients is surveillance. The advantages and the disadvantages of each approach are discussed. The overall risk of recurrence is about 30%, but there have been patient groups defined that may vary in risk from 10% to 15% up to 50% or more. Patients with advanced seminoma are treated with chemotherapy. When this procedure is used, outcomes are favorable and all patients are either in good- or intermediate-risk groups, according to the international classification system. Patients with small-volume stage II tumors are treated with radiotherapy. Radiation is also generally used for the treatment of clinical stage I patients, although surveillance is growing in prominence as a means to treat these patients. Late effects of treatment are also discussed in this article. Ejaculatory function can be preserved in most patients who have early stage tumors and who undergo RPLND and in some patients who undergo surgery after chemotherapy. The most troubling effect of chemotherapy is the development of etoposide-induced leukemia, a unique--and fortunately rare--clinical entity.     

The effects of antifungal agents on the morphogenetic transformation by Candida albicans in vitro

There are currently three mood stabilizers available for the maintenance treatment of patients with bipolar I disorder: lithium, valproate, and carbamazepine. Unfortunately, monotherapy with each of these conventional agents often fails. To improve outcome, clinicians utilize polypharmacy. Although the efficacy of this practice is largely unknown, because of the lack of controlled studies, data from the United States and Europe indicate polypharmacy is the rule rather than the exception. The few controlled trials that have been conducted indicate that (1) the specific combination of lithium plus imipramine provides no advantage over lithium monotherapy (notwithstanding the inadequacy of lithium monotherapy); (2) the specific combination of lithium and the depot neuroleptic flupenthixol provides no advantage over lithium monotherapy; and (3) the combination of lithium plus carbamazepine may be as effective as lithium plus haloperidol for acute and continuation treatment. Most of the literature on polypharmacy consists of case reports, retrospective chart reviews, and open-label prospective studies, and describes the use of numerous combinations of medications, including lithium plus valproate, lithium plus carbamazepine, and valproate plus carbamazepine. Preliminary findings suggest these combinations may be effective, and that clozapine and high-dose levothyroxine may each be useful as well when combined with other drugs. Further research is necessary to formally evaluate whether these drug combinations are more effective than monotherapy. Until such studies are completed, certain general principles regarding side effects, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics should be kept in mind when prescribing two or more medications concurrently.