Properties and morphology of oriented ternary blends of poly(ethylene terephthalate), high density polyethylene,and compatibilizing agent

Oriented blends of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) and high density polyethylene (HDPE) with and without compatibilizing agent have been studied with regard to orientation temperature, stretch rate, extension ratio, mode of orientation, and blend composition. These oriented blends have been characterized using infrared spectroscopy and differential scanning calorimetry. The tensile and tensile impact properties were also investigated. The results show that blends with compatibilizer show strain hardening upon orientation, whereas the blend without compatibilizer does not strain harden upon orientation. The blends with less PET content have been difficult to orient. The morphology of these blends show fibril structure, highly oriented in the direction of stretch. Infrared measurements show that PET within the blend has undergone strain induced crystallization upon orientation. It has also been observed that the mechanical properties, such as the modulus and ultimate stress, show improvement upon orientation. Simultaneously stretched blends show better physical properties than sequentially oriented blends.     

Reactive compatibilization and properties of recycled poly(ethylene terephthalate)/polyethylene blends

Summary Blends of recycled poly(ethylene terephthalate) (R-PET) and high-density polyethylene (R-PE), obtained from post-consumer packaging materials, were prepared both by melt mixing and extrusion processes and compatibilized by addition of various copolymers containing functional reactive groups, such as maleic anhydride, acrylic acid and glycidyl methacrylate. The effect of the type and concentration of compatibilizer, as well as the mixing conditions, on the phase morphology, thermal behaviour, rheological and mechanical properties of the blends was investigated. The results indicated that addition (5÷10 pph) of ethylene-co-glycidyl methacrylate copolymer (E-GMA) allows for a marked improvement of processability and physical/mechanical performances of R-PET/R-PE blends. Received: 1 March 2001/Revised version: 15 November 2001/ Accepted: 28 January 2002     

Study of heat shrinkability of crosslinked low‐density polyethylene/poly(ethylene vinyl acetate) blends

In this study, the heat‐shrinkage property in polymer was induced by first compounding low‐density polyethylene/poly(ethylene vinyl acetate) (LDPE/EVA) blends with various amounts of peroxide in a twin‐screw extruder at about 130°C. The resulting granules were molded to shape and chemically crosslinked by compression molding. A process of heating–stretching–cooling was then performed on the samples while on a tensile machine. Shrinkability and effective parameters were also investigated using thermal mechanical analysis. The results showed that the gel fraction was higher for the sample of higher EVA content with the same amount of dicumyl peroxide (DCP). A decrease in the melting point and heat of fusion (ΔH_f), as determined from DSC, was observed with an increase in the DCP content. Studies on the heat shrinkability of the samples showed that samples stretched above the melting point had a higher shrinkage temperature than those stretched around the crystal transition temperature. The results showed that by increasing the peroxide content, the shrinkage temperature was decreased. These could be attributed to the formation of new spherulites as well as changes in the amount and the size of crystals. Furthermore, in samples elongated at 120°C (above the melting point), the rate of stretching had no effect on the shrinkage temperature. The results showed that the extent of strain had no effect on the temperature of shrinkage, but rather on the ultimate shrinkage value. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 91: 1389–1395, 2004     

A lithium ionomer of poly(ethylene‐co‐methacrylic acid) copolymer as compatibilizer for blends of poly(ethylene terephthalate) and high density polyethylene

Blends of 75/25 poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET)/high density polyethylene (HDPE) containing poly(ethylene‐co‐methacrylic acid) partially neutralized with lithium (PEMA‐Li) were obtained by direct injection molding in an attempt (i) to ameliorate the poor performance of the binary blend and (ii) to find the best compatibilizer content. The presence of PEMA‐Li caused a nucleation effect on PET, and a decrease in the crystalline content of HDPE. The compatibilizing effect of PEMA‐Li was due to the combined effects of interaction at the interface and chemical reactions. The ternary blends showed a complex morphology, with two dispersed HDPE and PEMA‐Li phases that contained a small internal dispersed phase, probably of PET. The compatibilizing effect of PEMA‐Li was clearly shown by means of an impressive increase in the ductility and to a minor extent in the impact strength. The highest property improvement (ductility increase 1450%) appeared upon the addition of 45% PEMA‐Li with respect to the HDPE phase, but taking into account the recycling interest, the ternary blend with the addition of roughly 22.5% PEMA‐Li appears to be the most attractive.     

Alternating copolymers as compatibilizer for blends of poly(ethylene terephthalate) and polystyrene

Compatibilization of blends of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) and polystyrene with alternating copolymers of maleic anhydride and isobutylene (IM) and its partly phenol substituted product (PIM) has been studied. The characterization techniques applied were dynamic mechanical analysis, differential scanning calorimetry, scanning electron microscopy, and tensile testing. In all compositions studied, morphological observations demonstrated that the addition of approximately 5 wt % of copolymers led to the domain size reduction of dispersants. The PIM copolymer was most effective in reducing the domain size, whereas the IM copolymer was less satisfactory. The blends containing PIM also gave the more enhanced ultimate strength than those of other systems. The noncrystalline PIM copolymers lowered the tensile modulus of the blend as much as 60% even in the polystyrene‐rich region and varied linearly with values of quenched PET modulus throughout the compositions, indicating the formation of homogeneous amorphous phase. Based on the experimental observation that the reduced domain size with PIM copolymer, a compatibilization mechanism of the blend with PIM alternating copolymer is proposed and discussed in terms of the interactions between ester groups of PET and PIM (transesterification), and the possible formation of intermediate π‐complex between the π‐electron deficient aromatic ring of PIM and π‐electron rich aromatic ring of PS. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 78: 1998–2007, 2000     

Morphology,mechanical and dynamic mechanical properties of recycled high density polyethylene and poly(vinyl alcohol) blends

Summary  Blends of post-consumer high density polyethylene (HDPEr) and poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) were prepared with maleic anhydride-grafted HDPEr (HDPEr-AM), as the compatibilizer, to evaluate the effectiveness of the PVA as a modifier for polyethylene and influence of PVA concentration on the blend properties. Films of polyethylene having biodegradable polymers could be a good solution for agricultural purpose since they can degrade more easily. The blends HDPEr/HDPEr-AM/PVA were investigated by physical tests, dynamic-mechanical analysis (DMA) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Thermal properties were measured by means of differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The blend HDPEr/HDPEr-AM/PVA (50/10/40) with 10wt% of compatibilizer showed the highest tensile strength (28 MPa) compared to the blends (60/40) without compatibilizer (11 MPa). On the other hand, morphologic analysis showed synergism of the polymers in the blend HDPEr/HDPEr-AM/PVA (30/10/60), with 10wt% of compatibilizer. Overall, it was observed that the blend HDPEr/HDPEr-AM/PVA with composition of (70/10/20) showed the best properties for agricultural films processing application.     

Mechanical compatibilization of high density polyethylene–poly(ethylene terephthalate) blends

Blends of high density polyethylene (HDPE) and poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) exhibit extremely poor mechanical properties owing to the incompatibility of these two polymers. Such blends, however, would result from the reprocessing of certain carbonated beverage bottles. Addition of small amounts of a commercially available triblock copolymer greatly improved the ductility of these incompatible blends, whereas addition of an ethylene–propylene elastomer did not. The results are discussed in terms of phase morphology and interfacial adhesion among the various components.     

Recycled poly(ethylene terephthalate)/linear low‐density polyethylene blends through physical processing

Poly(styrene‐ethylene/butylene‐styrene) (SEBS) was used as a compatibilizer to improve the thermal and mechanical properties of recycled poly(ethylene terephthalate)/linear low‐density polyethylene (R‐PET/LLDPE) blends. The blends compatibilized with 0–20 wt % SEBS were prepared by low‐temperature solid‐state extrusion. The effect of SEBS content was investigated using scanning electron microscope, differential scanning calorimeter, dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA), and mechanical property testing. Morphology observation showed that the addition of 10 wt % SEBS led to the deformation of dispersed phase from spherical to fibrous structure, and microfibrils were formed at the interface between two phases in the compatibilized blends. Both differential scanning calorimeter and DMA results revealed that the blend with 20 wt % SEBS showed better compatibility between PET and LLDPE than other blends studied. The addition of 20 wt % of SEBS obviously improved the crystallizibility of PET as well as the modulus of the blends. DMA analysis also showed that the interaction between SEBS and two other components enhanced at high temperature above 130°C. The impact strength of the blend with 20 wt % SEBS increased of 93.2% with respect to the blend without SEBS, accompanied by only a 28.7% tensile strength decrease. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2009     

Improving low‐density polyethylene/poly(ethylene terephthalate) blends with graft copolymers

Blends of low‐density polyethylene (LDPE) and poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) were prepared with different weight compositions with a plasticorder at 240°C at a rotor speed of 64 rpm for 10 min. The physicomechanical properties of the prepared blends were investigated with special reference to the effects of the blend ratio. Graft copolymers, that is, LDPE‐grafted acrylic acid and LDPE‐grafted acrylonitrile, were prepared with γ‐irradiation. The copolymers were melt‐mixed in various contents (i.e., 3, 5, 7, and 9 phr) with a LDPE/PET blend with a weight ratio of 75/25 and used as compatibilizers. The effect of the compatibilizer contents on the physicomechanical properties and equilibrium swelling of the binary blend was investigated. With an increase in the compatibilizer content up to 7 phr, the blend showed an improvement in the physicomechanical properties and reduced equilibrium swelling in comparison with the uncompatibilized one. The addition of a compatibilizer beyond 7 phr did not improve the blend properties any further. The efficiency of the compatibilizers (7 phr) was also evaluated by studies of the phase morphology (scanning electron microscopy) and thermal properties (differential scanning calorimetry and thermogravimetric analysis). © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Thermal properties and morphology of recycled poly(ethylene terephthalate)/maleic anhydride grafted linear low‐density polyethylene blends

Properties of recycled Poly(ethylene terephthalate) were greatly improved. Recycled PET was blended with LLDPE‐g‐MA by low‐temperature solid‐state extrusion. Mechanical properties of the blends were affected obviously by the added LLDPE‐g‐MA. Elongation at break reaches 352.8% when the blend contains 10 wt % LLDPE‐g‐MA. Crystallization behavior of PET phase was affected by LLDPE‐g‐MA content. Crystallinity of PET decreased with the increase of LLDPE‐g‐MA content. FTIR testified that maleic anhydride group in LLDPE‐g‐MA reacted with the end hydroxyl groups of PET and PET‐co‐LLDPE‐g‐MA copolymers were in situ synthesized. SEM micrographs display that LLDPE‐g‐MA phase and PET phase are incompatible and the compatibility of the blends can be improved by the forming of PET‐co‐LLDPE‐g‐MA copolymer. LLDPE‐g‐MA content was less, the LLDPE‐g‐MA phase dispersed in PET matrix fine. With the increase of LLDPE‐g‐MA content, the morphology of dispersed LLDPE‐g‐MA phase changed from spherule to cigar bar, then to irregular spherule. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Melting and solidification behavior of blends of high density polyethylene with poly(butylene terephthalate)

This study focuses on the effect of various processing and cooling conditions upon the subsequent melting and solidification behavior of blends of poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT) and high density polyethylene (HDPE). Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) measurements have shown that the crystallization of reprocessed PBT is different from the crystallization behavior of virgin samples. Two melting endotherms for PBT were observed for reprocessed PBT and for PBT-PE blends. The nature of each PBT peak is discussed in relation to processing history, solidification conditions, and composition. The presence of two crystallization peaks for the PE component in blends of PE and PBT are thought to be associated with the restriction of molecular motion of PE in the presence of the second component. The relative magnitudes of the two exotherms of PE vary with composition and cooling rate during solidification.     

Rheological properties of the blends of polychloroprene with poly[ethylene(vinyl acetate)]

Blends of poly[ethylene(vinylacetate)] (EVAc-45; 45% VAc content) and polychloroprene (CR) have been studied with respect to capillary and dynamic flow. It is found that EVAc-45, CR, and their blends are shear thinning (pseudoplastic) in nature. Though shear viscosity (η_a) and dynamic out-of-phase viscosity (η′_E) obeys power law, dynamic elongational viscosity (η′_E) does not follow it due to the synchronization of molecular vibration with the applied frequency at around 11 Hz. Both η_a and η′_E of the blends show positive deviation with respect to their additive values. The relative positive deviation (RPD) in shear flow increases with increasing temperature and shear rate. In the case of dynamic flow, RPD increases with increasing temperature but exhibits a decreasing trend with increasing frequency. RPD can be fitted well into a fifth-order equation with a weight fraction of CR (W_CR) in EVAc-45—CR blends. From rheological point of view, this relative positive deviation indicates blend compatibility between EVAc-45 and CR. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 66: 1759–1765, 1997     

Thermal and mechanical properties of poly(methyl methacrylate) and ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer blends

A series of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) blends have been prepared with different compositions viz., 5, 10, 15, and 20 wt % ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) copolymer by melt blending method in Haake Rheocord. The effect of different compositions of EVA on the physico‐mechanical and thermal properties of PMMA and EVA copolymer blends have been studied. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) has been employed to investigate the phase behavior of PMMA/EVA blends from the point of view of component specific interactions, molecular motions and morphology. The resulting morphologies of the various blends also studied by optical microscope. The DSC analysis indicates the phase separation between the PMMA matrix and EVA domains. The impact strength analysis revealed a substantial increase in impact strength from 19 to 32 J/m. The TGA analysis reveals the reduction in onset of thermal degradation temperature of PMMA with increase in EVA component of the blend. The optical microscope photographs have demonstrated the PMMA/EVA system had a microphase separated structure consisting of dispersed EVA domains within a continuous PMMA matrix. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 2007     

Crystalline and thermal behavior of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/polyphenoxy blends

Poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET)/polyphenoxy blends were prepared by melt blending. Crystalline and thermal behaviors of PET/polyphenoxy blends were verified by use of DSC. The experiment results show that the initial temperature, peak temperature, and ending temperature of cold crystallization increase with increasing phenoxy content. On the contrary, the onset melting temperature, finishing melting temperature, and peak temperature in the first heating and the secondary heating processes decrease with increasing phenoxy content. The crystallization enthalpy and melting enthalpy, as well as the crystallization rate, decrease with increasing phenoxy content. Avrami exponents of the blends are slightly higher than that of pure PET and almost independent of phenoxy content. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 97: 878–885, 2005     

Study on the morphology and properties of metallocene polyethylene and ethylene/vinyl acetate blends

Two commercial polymer materials, metallocene linear low density polyethylene (m‐LLDPE) and ethylene/vinyl acetate copolymer (EVA) have been used to form binary blends of various compositions. The mechanical properties, morphology, rheological behavior, dynamic mechanical properties, and crystallization of m‐LLDPE/EVA blends were investigated. It was found that with the addition of EVA, the fluidity and processability of m‐LLDPE were significantly improved, and the introduction of polar groups in this system showed no significant changes in mechanical properties at lower EVA content. As verified by morphology observation and differential scanning calorimetry analysis, miscible blends were formed within certain weight ratios. Dynamic mechanical property studies showed that flexibility of the blends was enhanced in comparion with pure m‐LLDPE, where the peak value of loss modulus shifted to lower temperature and its intensity was enhanced as EVA content increased, indicating the existence of more amorphous regions in the blends. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 91: 905–910, 2004     

Morphological origin of super toughness in poly(ethylene terephthalate)/polyethylene blends

A compatibilization strategy for poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) and polyethylene (PE) blends to achieve high toughness is described. Maleic anhydride functionalized styrene–ethylene–butylene–styrene (MA-g-SEBS) block copolymer at 20 pph was found to produce an intricate multidomain morphology in which the two major components (50% PE, 50% PET) and the compatibilizer coexist on a hierarchal order. A portion of the PET was dispersed as interconnected rodlike domains oriented along the injection direction. The rest of the PET and the PE constituted beadlike nano domains which served as the matrix. The blend at all these morphological levels responded to deformation in a cooperative fashion giving rise to a super tough material. That is, a blend whose elongation at break (600%) was superior to its two major components (90% for PET and 300% for PE). © 1993 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

High-impact poly(ethylene terephthalate) blends

Rubbers of different kind were tested as toughening agents of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET), noting significant morphological and mechanical differences. In particular, good results were obtained by using an ethylene–ethyl acrylate–glycidyl methacrylate copolymer. The resulting blend evidenced good particle distribution, and the latter was related to chemical interactions between the rubber epoxy groups and PET terminal groups, including the effect of low molecular weight and polymeric amine catalysts, and to extrusion conditions. © 1995 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Studies on aluminum-isopropoxide doped poly(ethylene oxide), poly(vinyl alcohol), and poly(ethylene oxide)-poly(vinyl alcohol) blends

Poly(ethylene oxide), poly(vinyl alcohol), and their blend in a 40 : 60 mole ratio were doped with aluminum isopropoxide. Their structural, thermal, and electrical properties were studied. Aluminum isopropoxide acts as a Lewis acid and thus significantly influences the electrical properties of the polymers and the blend. It also acts as a scavanger for the trace quantities of water present in them, thereby reducing the magnitude of proton transport. It also affects the structure of polymers that manifests in the thermal transformation and decomposition characteristics. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 69: 2147–2157, 1998     

Compatibility studies on blends of poly(ethylene ortho-phthalate) and poly(vinyl acetate)

Blends of poly(ethylene ortho-phthalate) (PEOP), and poly(vinyl acetate) (PVAc), appear to be compatible at all compositions, from visual examination at room temperature and differential scanning calorimetry tests. Both low- (PEOP-1) and high-molecular weight (PEOP-2) alloys with PVAc show a single composition-dependent glass transition temperature (Tg). Some blends show Tg values that are below the Tg for either of the pure polymers. Couchman's equation, with a slight modification, can be used to model Tg behavior. All PEOP-2 blends with PVAc, phase separate at high temperatures, whereas PEOP-1–PVAc blends remain miscible under the same conditions. The composition dependence of the blends refractive index shows a deviation from simple additivity rules, and a similar trend is observed in density measurements. When comparing Flory's characteristic parameters for the polymers, compatibility is predicted for PVAc–PEOP blends. In contrast, blends of PEOP and poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), which has a similar chemical structure to that of PVAc are predicted to be incompatible, in agreement with experimental evidence. It is suggested that compatibility is produced because of possible specific interactions between the aromatic group of PEOP and the ester carbonyl on PVAc, which is not sterically hindered as is the corresponding moiety on PMMA.     

Improving poly(ethylene terephthalate)/high-density polyethylene blends by using graft copolymers

The synthesis and the application of graft copolymers prepared from ozonized polyethylene (HDPE) are described. The homopolymer was treated with ozone and then copolymerized with monomers, such as methyl methacrylate, hydroxy ethyl methacrylate, glycidyl methacrylate, maleic anhydride, and ethyl acrylate. The products were used as compatibilizers in HDPE/PET [poly(ethylene terephthate)] blends. The mechanical properties and the influence of graft comonomers are described. The copolymers were characterized by the grafting rate and FTIR spectroscopy.