Mechanical and thermal properties of LDPE‐cellulose acetate phthalate blends—Effect of maleic anhydride‐grafted LDPE compatibilizer

Biodegradable blends of LDPE and cellulose acetate phthalate have been prepared. Maleic anhydride‐grafted LDPE has been added as a compatibilizer to this blend. The elastic modulus and tensile strength has been considerably improved by adding LDPE‐g‐maleic anhydride compatibilizer. Scanning electron microscope micrographs reflected the observed results for the increase in mechanical properties of the blend. Further blend morphology exhibited a deformed matrix for the compatibilized blends. Thermogravimetric analysis studies showed two‐stage degradation for the blends. Differential scanning calorimetry thermograms showed a loss of crystallinity for the LDPE phase. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2009     

Mechanical properties of esterified tapioca starch–LDPE blends using LDPE‐co‐glycidyl methacrylate as compatibilizer

Studies on the mechanical properties of acetylated and phthalated starch blends with low density polyethylene (LDPE) were performed with and without LDPE‐co‐glycidyl methacrylate copolymer as compatibilizer. Impact and tensile properties of the blend specimens were measured following standard ASTM methods. Thermogravimetric analysis of esterified starches and of the blends were also conducted. Scanning electron microscopy was used to analyze the fractured and unfractured blends. Results indicate a significant improvement in the mechanical properties by starch esterification, which is further enhanced by the addition of the compatibilizer. Copyright © 2004 Society of Chemical Industry     

Morphology and tensile properties of crosslinked nanocomposite foams of low‐density polyethylene and poly(ethylene‐co‐vinyl acetate) blends

This paper studies the morphology and tensile properties of nanocomposite foams of blends of low‐density polyethylene (LDPE) and poly(ethylene‐co‐vinyl acetate) (EVA). Preparations of LDPE/EVA nanocomposites were conducted in an internal mixer, and then samples were foamed via a batch foaming method. Morphology of the nanocomposite blends and nanocomposite foams was studied by X‐ray diffraction, transmission electron microscopy, and scanning electron microscopy. Morphological observations showed that nanoparticle dispersion in the polymeric matrix was affected by the blend ratio in a way such that EVA‐rich samples had a better dispersion of nanoclay than LDPE‐rich ones. In addition, the tensile properties of the nanocomposite foams were related to different variables such as blend ratio, clay content, and foam density. J. VINYL ADDIT. TECHNOL., 2010. © 2010 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Correlation between the morphology and dynamic mechanical properties of ethylene vinyl acetate/linear low‐density polyethylene blends: Effects of the blend ratio and compatibilization

The effects of the blend composition and compatibilization on the morphology of linear low‐density polyethylene (LLDPE)/ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) blends were studied. The blends showed dispersed/matrix and cocontinuous phase morphologies that depended on the composition. The blends had a cocontinuous morphology at an EVA concentration of 40–60%. The addition of the compatibilizer first decreased the domain size of the dispersed phase, which then leveled off. Two types of compatibilizers were added to the polymer/polymer interface: linear low‐density polyethylene‐g‐maleic anhydride and LLDPE‐g phenolic resin. Noolandi's theory was in agreement with the experimental data. The conformation of the compatibilizer at the blend interface could be predicted by the calculation of the area occupied by the compatibilizer molecule at the interface. The effects of the blend ratio and compatibilization on the dynamic mechanical properties of the blends were analyzed from ?60°C to +35°C. The experiments were performed over a series of frequencies. The area under the curve of the loss modulus versus the temperature was higher than the values obtained by group contribution analysis. The loss tangent curve showed a peak corresponding to the glass transition of EVA, indicating the incompatibility of the blend system. The damping characteristics of the blends increased with increasing EVA content because of the decrease in the crystalline volume of the system. Attempts were made to correlate the observed viscoelastic properties of the blends with the morphology. Various composite models were used to model the dynamic mechanical data. Compatibilization increased the storage modulus of the system because of the fine dispersion of EVA domains in the LLDPE matrix, which provided increased interfacial interaction. Better compatibilization was effected at a 0.5–1% loading of the compatibilizer. This was in full agreement with the dynamic mechanical spectroscopy data. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 100: 4526–4538, 2006     

Effects of high‐energy electron beam on low‐density polyethylene materials containing EVA

A series of low‐density polyethylene (LDPE) blends with different amounts of ethylene–vinyl–acetate (EVA) was prepared and irradiated with 10 MeV electron beam in the range of 0–250 kGy at room temperature in air. EVA was used as a compatibilizer and softener in four different amounts: 5, 10, 20, and 30 wt %, based on polyethylene (PE). The crosslinking of the samples was studied on the basis of gel‐content measurements as well as some thermal and mechanical properties of the specimens. The results indicated that the LDPE and LDPE–EVA blends could be crosslinked by a high‐energy electron beam, of which their thermal and mechanical properties changed effectively, however, because of EVA content of the polymer; the blends were more sensitive to lower doses of radiation. These studies were carried out to obtain a suitable compound for heat‐shrinkable tubes. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 92: 1049–1052, 2004     

木质素填充LDPE、EVA对复合物性能的影响

以木质素为填充剂分别与低密度聚乙烯(LDPE)、乙烯-乙酸乙烯酯共聚物(EVA)共混,经双螺杆造粒机共混挤出造粒,再经吹塑成膜。研究了木质素/LDPE、木质素/EVA共混物薄膜的表面形貌、力学性能、热性能和红外光谱。热分析表明木质素与EVA共混物的热稳定性比木质素与LDPE的共混物热稳定性好;红外光谱分析表明木质素与EVA分子间产生了强烈的相互作用,扫描电镜分析表明木质素与EVA共混的相容性较好,力学性能分析表明低于30%的木质素与LDPE、EVA共混力学性能较好。     

Structural characterization of LDPE/EVA blends containing nanoclay‐flame retardant combinations

The combination of different types of organo‐modified montmorillonite (MMT) with aluminum hydroxide (aluminum trihydrate—ATH), as a flame retardant system for polyethylene‐ethylene vinyl acetate (LDPE/EVA), blends were studied. Five different types of organically modified montmorillonite clays, each with different modifier, were used. The structural characterization was carried out by X‐ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy in transmission mode (STEM). The mechanical and rheological properties were also evaluated. The XRD analysis showed a clear displacement of the d₀₀₁ signal, which indicates a good degree of intercalation, especially for the MMT‐I28 and MMT‐20, from Nanocor and Southern Clay Products, respectively. The presence of ATH and the compatibilizer did not have any effect on the exfoliation of the studied samples. The thermal stability and flame retardant properties were evaluated by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), limiting oxygen index (LOI—ASTM D2863), and flammability tests (Underwriters Laboratory—UL‐94). The effect of different compatibilizers on the clay dispersion and exfoliation was studied. The results indicated that the addition of montmorillonite makes it possible to substitute part of the ATH filler content while maintaining the flame retardant requirements. The thermal stability of MMT/ATH‐filled LDPE/EVA blends presented a slight increase over the reference ATH‐filled LDPE/EVA blend. Compositions with higher clay content (10 wt %) showed better physicochemical properties. The increased stability of the higher clay content compositions results from the greater inorganic residual formation; this material has been reported to impart better performance in flammability tests. The mechanical properties and flame retardancy remained similar to those of the reference compound. The reduced ATH content resulted in lower viscosities and densities, facilitating the processing of the polymer/ATH/clay compounds. Extrusion of these compounds produced a lower pressure in the extrusion head and required reduced electrical power consumption. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011     

Poly(ethylene‐graft‐ethylene oxide) (PE‐PEO) and poly(ethylene‐co‐acrylic acid) (PEAA) as compatibilizers in blends of LDPE and polyamide‐6

In a blend of two immiscible polymers a controlled morphology can be obtained by adding a block or graft copolymer as compatibilizer. In the present work blends of low‐density polyethylene (PE) and polyamide‐6 (PA‐6) were prepared by melt mixing the polymers in a co‐rotating, intermeshing twin‐screw extruder. Poly(ethylene‐graft‐polyethylene oxide) (PE‐PEO), synthesized from poly(ethylene‐co‐acrylic acid) (PEAA) (backbone) and poly(ethylene oxide) monomethyl ether (MPEO) (grafts), was added as compatibilizer. As a comparison, the unmodified backbone polymer, PEAA, was used. The morphology of the blends was studied by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Melting and crystallization behavior of the blends was investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and mechanical properties by tensile testing. The compatibilizing mechanisms were different for the two copolymers, and generated two different blend morphologies. Addition of PE‐PEO gave a material with small, well‐dispersed PA‐spheres having good adhesion to the PE matrix, whereas PEAA generated a morphology characterized by small PA‐spheres agglomerated to larger structures. Both compatibilized PE/PA blends had much improved mechanical properties compared with the uncompatibilized blend, with elongation at break (ε_b) increasing up to 200%. Addition of compatibilizer to the PE/PA blends stabilized the morphology towards coalescence and significantly reduced the size of the dispersed phase domains, from an average diameter of 20 μm in the unmodified PE/PA blend to approximately 1 μm in the compatibilized blends. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 78: 2416–2424, 2000     

Poly(para‐dioxanone)/poly(D,L‐lactide) blends compatibilized with poly(D,L‐lactide‐co‐para‐dioxanone)

The effect of poly(D ,L ‐lactide‐co‐para‐dioxanone) (PLADO) as the compatibilizer on the properties of the blend of poly(para‐dioxanone) (PPDO) and poly(D ,L ‐lactide) (PDLLA) has been investigated. The 80/20 PPDO/PDLLA blends containing from 1% to 10% of random copolymer PLADO were prepared by solution coprecipitation. The PLADO component played a very important role in determining morphology, thermal, mechanical, and hydrophilic properties of the blends. Addition of PLADO into the blends could enhance the compatibility between dispersed PDLLA phase and PPDO matrix; the boundary between the two phases became unclear and even the smallest holes were not detected. On the other hand, the position of the T_g was composition dependent; when 5% PLADO was added into blend, the T_g distance between PPDO and PDLLA was shortened. The blends with various contents of compatibilizer had better mechanical properties compared with simple PPDO/PDLLA binary polymer blend, and such characteristics further improved as adding 5% random copolymers. The maximum observed tensile strength was 29.05 MPa for the compatibilized PPDO/PDLLA blend with 5% PLADO, whereas tensile strength of the uncompatibilized PPDO/PDLLA blend was 14.03 MPa, which was the lowest tensile strength. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011     

Double‐yielding behavior in injection‐molded polycarbonate/high‐density polyethylene/ethylene–vinyl acetate copolymer blends

A uniaxial tensile test was performed for polycarbonate (PC)/high‐density polyethylene (HDPE)/ethylene–vinyl acetate copolymer (EVA) blends with a fixed EVA content but various PC contents. The double‐yielding phenomenon and its composition dependence, as observed in the PC/HDPE blend, were again detected. EVA did not serve as a successful compatibilizer of PC and HDPE in the PC/HDPE/EVA blend. The incorporation of EVA resulted in a larger size and a more irregular shape of the PC fibers, as indicated in the scanning electron microscope observations; this, consequently, produced a higher serious stress concentration in the blend. This more complicated and instable morphology produced different double‐yielding behaviors in the PC/HDPE/EVA blends compared with the binary one. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Effect of the type of nylon chain‐end on the compatibilization of PP/PP‐GMA/nylon 6 blends

Polyamide and polypropylene (PP) are two important classes of commercial polymers; however, their direct mixing leads to incompatible blends with poor properties. Polypropylene functionalized with glycidyl methacrylate (PP‐GMA) was used as a compatibilizer in blends of PP and nylon 6, because of the possible reaction of ? NH₂ and ? COOH groups with the epoxide group of GMA. Two types of nylon 6 with different ratios between ? NH₂ and ? COOH groups were used. The one with higher concentration of ? COOH groups was less compatible with PP in a binary blend. When PP‐GMA was used as a compatibilizer, a better dispersion of nylon in the PP matrix was obtained together with better mechanical properties for both nylons used in this work. © 2001 Society of Chemical Industry     

Mechanical,thermal, and microstructural properties of polypropylene/polyamide‐6/styrene‐ethylene‐butadiene‐styrene polymer alloys

Interfacial agents as compatibilizers have recently been introduced into polymer blends to improve the microstructure and mechanical properties of thermoplastics. In this way, it is possible to prepare a mixture of polymeric materials that can have superior mechanical properties over a wide temperature range. In this study, an incompatible blend of polypropylene (PP) and polyamide‐6 (PA₆) were made compatible by the addition of 10% styrene–ethylene–butadiene–styrene copolymer (SEBS). The mixing operation was conducted by using a twin‐screw extruder. The morphology and the compatibility of the mixtures were examined by SEM and DSC techniques. Furthermore, the elastic modulus, tensile and yield strengths, percentage elongation, hardness, melt flow index, Izod impact resistance, heat deflection temperature (HDT), and Vicat softening point values of polymer alloys of various ratios were determined. It was found that the addition of SEBS to the structures decreased the tensile strength, yield strength, elastic modulus, and hardness, whereas it increased the Izod impact strength and percentage elongation values. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 89: 3485–3491, 2003     

Photobiodegradation of low‐density polyethylene/banana starch films

The effects of the starch content, photosensitizer content, and compatibilizer on the photobiodegradability of low‐density polyethylene (LDPE) and banana starch polymer blend films were investigated. The compatibilizer and photosensitizer used in the films were PE‐graft‐maleic anhydride (PE‐g‐MA) and benzophenone, respectively. Dried banana starch at 0–20% (w/w) of LDPE, benzophenone at 0–1% (w/w) of LDPE, and PE‐g‐MA at 10% (w/w) of banana starch were added to LDPE. The photodegradation of the blend films was performed with outdoor exposure. The progress of the photodegradation was followed by determining the carbonyl index derived from Fourier transform IR measurements and the changes in tensile properties. Biodegradation of the blend films was investigated by a soil burial test. The biodegradation process was followed by measuring the changes in the physical appearance, weight loss, and tensile properties of the films. The results showed that both photo‐ and biodegradation rates increased with increasing amounts of banana starch, whereas the tensile properties of the films decreased. The blends with higher amounts of benzophenone showed higher rates of photodegradation, although their biodegradation rates were reduced with an increase in benzophenone content. The addition of PE‐g‐MA into polymer blends led to an increase in the tensile properties whereas the photobiodegradation was slightly decreased compared to the films without PE‐g‐MA. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 100: 2725–2736, 2006     

Effect of addition of EVA on the technical properties of extruded foam profiles of low-density polyethylene/EVA blends

Some technical properties (static mechanical properties, dynamic mechanical properties, creep-recovery behavior, thermal expansion, and thermal conductivity) of low-density foams (50 kg/m³) made of blends of low-density polyethylene (LDPE) and the ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer (EVA) were studied as a function of the EVA proportion in the blends. These properties were compared with those of a foam made of a blend of EVA and ethylene propylene rubber (EPR). The knowledge of how the EVA proportion influences the behavior of these blend foam materials is a fundamental factor in order to obtain a wide range of polyolefin foams, with similar density, suitable for different applications. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 68: 1237–1244, 1998     

Use of poly(ethylene‐co‐vinyl alcohol) as compatibilizer in LDPE/thermoplastic tapioca starch blends

Poly(ethylene‐co‐vinyl alcohol) (EVOH) was used as a compatibilizer to make blends of low‐density polyethylene (LDPE) and plasticized starch (TS). The tensile properties and impact strength were measured and compared with those of neat LDPE. The morphology of the blend specimens, both fractured and unfractured, was observed by scanning electron microscopy. Comparison of the properties showed that the impact strength of the blend improves significantly by the addition of a compatibilizer even with a high TS loading of 40 and 50% (by weight). A high elongation at break almost matching that of neat polyethylene was also obtained. The blend morphology of the etched specimens revealed fine dispersion of the starch in the polyethylene matrix, while the fracture surface morphology clearly indicate that the failure of compatibilized blends occurs mainly by the ductile mode. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 86: 3126–3134, 2002     

Use of Functionalized Metallocene Copolymers from Ethylene and Polar Olefins as Compatibilizers for Low‐Density‐Polyethylene/Starch and Low‐Density‐Polyethylene/Dextran Blends

Summary: Functionalized metallocene copolymers synthesized from ethylene with 5‐hexen‐1‐ol and ethylene with 10‐undecen‐1‐ol were used as compatibilizers in LDPE/starch and LDPE/dextran blends in order to improve the interfacial adhesion between hydrophobic LDPE and hydrophilic natural polymers. An increase in tensile modulus and a slight decrease in tensile strength was observed when poly[ethylene‐co‐(10‐undecen‐1‐ol)] was added to a 70:30 wt.‐% LDPE/dextran blend, whereas the addition of poly[ethylene‐co‐(5‐hexen‐1‐ol)] as compatibilizer resulted in obtaining a more rigid material with a slightly higher modulus. Scanning electron microscopy of modified dextran blends containing 3 wt.‐% of both compatibilizers showed some degree of phase cocontinuity. Enhanced interfacial adhesion and decrease in particle size of starch was observed when 5 wt.‐% of poly [ethylene‐co‐(5‐hexen‐1‐ol)] copolymer was used as the compatibilizer in starch blends. The crystallization temperature of LDPE, determined by DSC, was shifted to a slightly higher temperature as a consequence of the addition of the compatibilizers. The existence of phase segregation was also revealed by thermal analysis when 5 wt.‐% of the copolymers were used as blend modifiers.

SEM micrograph of 70:30 wt.‐% LDPE/dextran blend with added poly[ethylene‐co‐(5‐hexen‐1‐ol)] compatibilizer.     

Compatibilizing effect of starch‐grafted‐poly(L‐lactide) on the poly(ε‐caprolactone)/starch composites

The poly(ε‐caprolactone) (PCL)/starch blends were prepared with a coextruder by using the starch grafted PLLA copolymer (St‐g‐PLLA) as compatibilizers. The thermal, mechanical, thermo‐mechanical, and morphological characterizations were performed to show the better performance of these blends compared with the virgin PCL/starch blend without the compatibilizer. Interfacial adhesion between PCL matrix and starch dispersion phases dominated by the compatibilizing effects of the St‐g‐PLLA copolymers was significantly improved. Mechanical and other physical properties were correlated with the compatibilizing effect of the St‐g‐PLLA copolymer. With the addition of starch acted as rigid filler, the Young's modulus of the PCL/starch blends with or without compatibilizer all increased, and the strength and elongation were decreased compared with pure PCL. Whereas when St‐g‐PLLA added into the blend, starch and PCL, the properties of the blends were improved markedly. The 50/50 composite of PCL/starch compatibilized by 10% St‐g‐PLLA gave a tensile strength of 16.6 MPa and Young's modulus of 996 MPa, respectively, vs. 8.0 MPa and 597 MPa, respectively, for the simple 50/50 blend of PCL/starch. At the same time, the storage modulus of compatibilized blends improved to 2940 MPa. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2010     

Application of phase dispersion–crosslinking synergism on recycling commingled plastic wastes

A tetra‐component blend, consisting of low‐density polyethylene (LDPE), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), polypropylene (PP), and polystyrene (PS), was studied as a model system of commingled plastic wastes (LDPE/PVC/PP/PS, mass ratio: 70/10/10/10). Effects of chlorinated polyethylene (CPE), ethylene–propylene–diene monomer (EPDM), styrene–butadiene–styrene (SBS), and their mixture (CPE/EPDM/SBS, mass ratio: 2/2/2) on the mechanical properties and morphology of the system were investigated. With addition of several elastomers and their mixture, the tensile strength of the blends decreased slightly, although both the elongation at break and the impact strength increased. Among these elastomers, EPDM exhibited the most significant impact modification effect for the tetra‐component blends. SBS and the mixture have a good phase‐dispersion effect for the tetra‐component blend. By adding a crosslinking agent [dicumyl peroxide (DCP)], the mechanical properties of the tetra‐component blends also increased. When either SBS or the mixture was added to the blend together with DCP, the probability that the crosslinking agent (DCP) would be at the interface improved because of the phase‐dispersion effect of SBS. Therefore, more co‐crosslinked products will form between LDPE and other components. Accordingly, remarkable improvement of the interfacial adhesion and hence the mechanical properties of the tetra‐component blends occurred. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 82: 2947–2952, 2001     

In situ fibre‐reinforced composite films of poly(lactic acid)/low‐density polyethylene blends: effects of composition on morphology,transport and mechanical properties

This study aimed to investigate the effects of blend composition on packaging‐related properties of poly(lactic acid) (PLA) and low density polyethylene (LDPE) blown films. Blend films with PLA contents of 5–20 wt% were produced and compared. Scanning electron micrographs of cross‐sectional cryofractured surfaces of the blend films revealed that in situ fibre‐reinforced composites were obtained. Viscosity ratio of the polymer components of ca 1 confirmed that fibre formation was favourable for this blend system. PLA microdomains were dispersed throughout the film in forms of long fibres (length‐to‐diameter ratio > 100) and ribbons. The number of fibres and ribbons increased with an increase of PLA content. Critical content of PLA was found to be 20 wt% for effective improvement of both moduli and gas barrier properties. Incorporation of poly[ethylene‐co‐(methyl acrylate)] compatibilizer showed minimal effect on PLA structure. However, it did improve moduli and O₂ barrier properties when sufficient amount (1.5 pph) was used in 10 wt% PLA/LDPE. In short, flow behaviour, ratio of polymer components and degree of compatibility together played intricate roles in the morphology and hence mechanical and transport properties of PLA/LDPE immiscible blends. © 2017 Society of Chemical Industry     

Acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene toughened nylon 6: The influences of compatibilizer on morphology and impact properties

Polymer alloys have been used as an alternative to obtain polymeric materials with unique physical properties. Generally, the polymer mixture is incompatible, which makes it necessary to use a compatibilizer to improve the interfacial adhesion. Nylon 6 (PA6) is an attractive polymer to use in engineering applications, but it has processing instability and relatively low notched impact strength. In this study, the acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene (ABS) triblock copolymer was used as an impact modifier for PA6. Poly(methyl methacrylate‐co‐maleic anyhydride) (MMA‐MA) and poly(methyl methacrylate‐co‐glycidyl methacrylate) (MMA‐GMA) were used as compatibilizers for this blend. The morphology and impact strength of the blends were evaluated as a function of blend composition and the presence of compatibilizers. The blends compatibilized with maleated copolymer exhibited an impact strength up to 800 J/m and a morphology with ABS domains more efi8ciently dispersed. Moderate amounts of MA functionality in the compatibilizer (～5%) and small amounts of compatibilizer in the blend (～5%) appear sufficient to improve the impact properties and ABS dispersion. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 87: 842–847, 2003