Endothelin ET(B) receptor-mediated constriction in the rabbit basilar artery

The present study tests whether endothelin ET(B) receptor activation can mediate endothelin-1 constriction in the rabbit basilar artery in situ. Endothelin-1 (30 nM) induced 27% constriction of vessels pretreated with 1 microM BQ610 (homopiperidenyl-CO-Leu-DTrp (CHO)-D-Trp-OH), an endothelin ET(A) receptor antagonist, and the resulting constriction was completely relaxed by BQ788 (N-cis-2,6-dimethylpiperidinocarbonyl L-gamma-MeLeu-D-Trp (COOCH3)-Nle), an endothelin ET(B) receptor antagonist. Similarly, 30 nM endothelin-1 induced 30% constriction of vessels pretreated with 1 microM BQ788, and the resulting constriction was completely relaxed by BQ610. In contrast, sarafotoxin S6c, an endothelin ET(B) receptor agonist, did not induce constriction. This study suggests that in the basilar artery (1) endothelin ET(B) receptor activation can result in constriction and (2) the ability to elicit constriction is in some way dependent upon the agonist that activates the endothelin ET(B) receptor.     

Use of the endothelin antagonists BQ-123 and PD 142893 to reveal three endothelin receptors mediating smooth muscle contraction and the release of EDRF

1. We have compared the receptors mediating the contractions of rings of rat thoracic aorta or rabbit pulmonary artery and rat stomach strips in response to the endothelin/sarafotoxin (ET/SX) family of peptides and to those mediating endothelium-dependent vasodilations within the isolated perfused mesentery of the rat. To discriminate ETA receptors from ETB receptors we have used the criteria that ET-1 is more active than SX6c on ETA receptors, and that the ET/SX peptides are equiactive on ETB receptors. We have also assessed the effects of the ETA receptor-selective antagonist BQ-123, and the non-selective ET receptor antagonist PD 142893 on the responses of each preparation to the ET/SX peptides. 2. ET-1-induced constrictions of the rat thoracic aorta (EC50 3 x 10(-10) M), a prototypic ETA receptor-mediated response, or isolated perfused mesentery of the rat were antagonized by BQ-123 (10(-5) M) or PD 142893 (10(-5) M). SX6c did not constrict either the rat isolated perfused mesentery or the rat thoracic aorta. Thus, ETA receptors mediate these constrictions. 3. ET-1 and SX6c were approximately equipotent in constricting rabbit pulmonary artery rings (EC50S 3-6 x 10(-10) M). Neither BQ-123 (10(-5) M) nor PD 142893 antagonized the contractions induced by ET-1. These effects suggest mediation by ETB receptors but PD 142893 (10(-5) M) did give a 3 fold antagonism of constrictions induced by SX6c. 4. SX6c was more potent than ET-1 in contracting the rat stomach strip (threshold concentrations 10(-10) and 3 x 10(-10) M). Contractions to ET-1 or SX6c were unaffected by BQ-123 (10-5 M), again indicative of ETB receptor-mediated events. PD 142893 (10-5 M) was ineffective against ET-1 but produced a 3 fold antagonism of SX6c.5. In the rat isolated perfused mesentery ET-1 or SX6c (0.3-300pmol) were equipotent in producing dose-related vasodilatations that were unaffected by BQ-123 (10-6 M), indicative of an ETB receptor mediated response. In contrast to the other ETB-mediated responses, PD 142893 (10-6 M) strongly antagonized these vasodilatations.6. Thus, ETA receptors mediate constrictions of the rat thoracic aorta and rat isolated perfused mesentery whereas ETB receptors mediate constrictions of the rabbit pulmonary artery and rat stomach strip and endothelium-dependent dilatations within the mesentery. However, within the group of ETB receptor-mediated responses, endothelium-dependent vasodilatations are sensitive to PD 142893, whereas contractions of the isolated smooth muscle preparations are not. Thus, the receptor present on the endothelium responsible for the release of nitric oxide in response to the ET/SX peptides is most probably different from that present on smooth muscle that mediates BQ-123-insensitive contractions.     

PD 142893, SB 209670, and BQ 788 selectively antagonize vascular endothelial versus vascular smooth muscle ET(B)-receptor activity in the rat

The purpose of this study was to determine whether vascular endothelial and vascular smooth-muscle endothelin ET(B) receptors could be quantitatively differentiated by PD 142893 (PD), SB 209670 (SB), and BQ 788 (BQ) in the same species by using closely matched experimental conditions. The isolated perfused rat kidney (vascular smooth muscle) and isolated perfused rat mesentery (vascular endothelium) were challenged with increasing bolus doses of sarafotoxin S6c in the absence and presence of antagonist. PD, SB, and BQ produced parallel concentration-dependent rightward shifts in the S6c dose-response curve in the kidney. PD and SB also produced parallel concentration-dependent rightward shifts in the S6c dose-response curve in the mesentery. In contrast, BQ produced an insurmountable antagonism. Schild-derived pA2 values for PD and SB were significantly greater for inhibiting endothelial versus smooth-muscle ET(B) receptors. Furthermore, PD and SB differed in their relative potency between the two assays. Because BQ produced an insurmountable antagonism in the mesentery, it was not possible quantitatively to compare the antagonist activity in the two assays. These results indicate that PD, SB, and BQ selectively antagonize endothelial ET(B)-receptor activity over smooth-muscle ET(B)-receptor activity.     

Platelets enhance contractility in perfused rat mesenteric arteries: involvement of endothelin-1

We investigated the effects of platelet supernatant on pressor responses to norepinephrine in isolated perfused rat mesenteric arteries. Perfusion of the arteries with platelet supernatant for 2 h markedly enhanced the pressor responses to norepinephrine (10(-6) and 3 x 10(-6) M). This enhancement was significantly inhibited by phosphoramidon (10(-4) M), an endothelin converting enzyme inhibitor. Both BQ788 [N-cis-2,6-dimethylpiperidinocarbonyl-L-gamma-methylleucyl-D -1-methoxycarbonyltryptophanyl-D-norleucine] (10(-6) M), an endothelin ET(B) receptor antagonist, and bosentan (Ro47-0203, 4-tert-butyl-N-[6-(2-hydroxy-ethoxy)-5-(2-methoxy-phenoxy)-2,2-bipyri midin-4-yl]-benzenesulfonamide) (10(-5) M), a nonselective endothelin receptor antagonist, also prevented the potentiation of responses to norepinephrine evoked by platelet supernatant, but FR 139317 ((R)2-[(R)-2-[(S)-2-[[1-(hexahydro-1H-azepinyl)]carbonyl]amino-4-+ ++methylpentanoyl] amino-3-[3-(1-methyl-1H-indoyl)]propionyl]amino-3-(2-pyridyl) propionic acid) (10-6 M), an endothelin ET(A) receptor antagonist, had little effect. Suppressor doses of endothelin-1 (3 x 10(-10) M) or sarafotoxin S6c (S6c) (3 x 10(-10) M) potentiated significantly the norepinephrine-induced vasoconstriction, in the same preparation. Moreover, supernatant-induced enhancement of pressor responses to norepinephrine was markedly suppressed by TGF-beta1 neutralizing antibody. Transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGF-beta1) (40 pM) also significantly enhanced the pressor responses to norepinephrine (10(-6) M) and this enhancement was significantly inhibited by phosphoramidon. These results suggest that platelet-derived TGF-beta1 stimulates the vascular production of endothelin-1 and thereby enhances vasoconstrictor responses to norepinephrine. Platelet-induced enhancement of vasoconstrictor responses to norepinephrine seems to be mainly mediated by endothelin ET(B) receptor, in rat mesenteric arteries.     

Endothelin receptors mediating vasoconstriction in rat pressurized small arteries

The effects of endothelin-1 (ET-1), a nonselective ETA and ETB receptor agonist, and sarafotoxin S6c, a selective ETB agonist, were investigated in the presence and absence of BQ123 and BQ788, ETA- and ETB-selective antagonists, respectively, in rat mesenteric small arteries, using a perfusion pressurized arteriograph in which segments of vessels were cannulated and exposed to constant pressure and flow. ET-1 (10(-13)-10(-7) M) induced vasoconstriction in both intact and endothelium-denuded arteries in a concentration-dependent manner. BQ123 (10(-7) and 10(-6) M) inhibited the effect of ET-1, displacing the concentration-response curve to the right in a concentration-dependent manner. The effect of ET-1 was not significantly affected by BQ788 (10(-7) and 10(-6) M), a selective antagonist of ETB receptors. Sarafotoxin S6c (10(-11)-10(-7) M) also induced a slight concentration-dependent vasoconstriction. The effect of sarafotoxin S6c (10(-8) M) was inhibited by the ETB-selective antagonist BQ788 (10(-7) M), but was not significantly changed by BQ123 (10(-7) M). Vasoconstriction induced by sarafotoxin S6c (10(-8) M) in a single bolus concentration was significantly greater than the contraction induced by the same concentration as part of a cumulative concentration-response curve, indicating desensitization or downregulation of ETB receptors during the latter. Repeated application of single concentrations of sarafotoxin S6c (10(-8) M) caused progressively smaller contraction of arteries. These results show the existence of both ETA and ETB vasoconstrictor receptors located on smooth muscle of small arteries. They also show that ETB receptors induce a smaller constrictor effect, and rapidly undergo desensitization after sustained or repeated activation.     

Endothelin-1-induced in vitro cerebral venoconstriction is mediated by endothelin ETA receptors

The in vitro effects of endothelin-1 on cerebral veins were studied using cylindrical segments, 5 mm long, from dog pial veins. Isometric responses to endothelin-1 (10(-12)-10(-7) M) and to the endothelin ET(B) receptor agonist, IRL 1620 (Suc-[Glu9,Ala11,15]endothelin-1-(8-21), 10(-12) -10(-7) M), were recorded in veins under control conditions and pretreated with the endothelin ET(A) receptor antagonist, BQ-123 (cyclo-(D-Asp-Pro-D-Val-Leu-D-Trp), 10(-8) -10(-5) M), and the endothelin ETB receptor antagonist, BQ-788 (N-[N-[N-[(2,6-dimethyl-1-piperidinyl)carbonyl]-4-methyl-L-leucyl]-1-(me thoxycarbonyl)-D-tryptophyl]-D-norleucine monosodium, 10(-6) and 10(-5) M). The response to endothelin-1 was also recorded in veins pretreated with the nitric oxide synthesis inhibitor, N(G)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME, 10(-4) M), or the cyclooxygenase inhibitor, meclofenamate (10(-5) M), and in veins without endothelium or placed in medium without Ca2+ but with EDTA (0.1 mM). In control veins, endothelin-1 produced a concentration-dependent contraction (EC50 = 2.0 x 10(-10) M; maximal contraction = 113 +/- 6 mg) and IRL 1620 induced no effects or a small contraction only with high concentrations (10(-8) - 10(-6) M) (EC50 = 1.5 x 10 (-8) M; maximal contraction = 9 +/- 3 mg). BQ-123 shifted the response to endothelin-1 to the right in a parallel, concentration-dependent way, whereas BQ-788, L-NAME or meclofenamate did not modify the response to endothelin-1. Compared with the control, veins in a medium without Ca2+ had similar EC50 values, but a lower maximal contraction induced by endothelin-1 (57 +/- 10 mg, P < 0.05), and veins without endothelium exhibited similar EC50 values. Thus, endothelin-1 produces marked cerebral venoconstriction that could be mainly mediated by activation of endothelin ETA receptors, may be dependent on extracellular Ca2+, and may be independent of endothelium, nitric oxide and prostanoids.     

In vivo and in vitro action of endothelin-1 on goat cerebrovascular bed

This study concerned the effects and mechanisms of action of endothelin-1 on the cerebral circulation. Cerebral blood flow was electromagnetically measured in awake goats. Endothelin-1 (0.01-0.3 nmol) produced dose-dependent decreases in this flow (maximal reduction = 34%) and increases in cerebrovascular resistance (maximal increase = 74%) (P < 0.01). IRL 1620 (Suc-[Glu9, Ala11,15]endothelin-1-(8-21), agonist for endothelin ET(B) receptors, 0.01-0.3 nmol) slightly decreased cerebral blood flow. The effects of endothelin-1, but not those of IRL 1620, on cerebral blood flow were diminished by 50% during infusion of the antagonist for endothelin ET(A) receptors, BQ-123 (cyclo-(D-Asp-Pro-D-Val-Leu-Trp), 2 nmol min(-1)), but not affected during infusion of the antagonist for endothelin ET(B) receptors, BQ-788 (N-[N-[N-[(2,6-dimethyl-1-piperidinyl)carbonyl]-4-methyl-L-Leucyl-1-(met hoxycarbonyl)-D-tryptophyl]-Dnorleucine monosodium), 2 nmol min(-1)). Intravenous administration of NW-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME, 47 mg kg(-1)) or NW-nitro-L-arginine (L-NNA, 47 mg kg(-1)) reduced basal cerebral blood flow by 39 and 33%, increased cerebrovascular resistance by 108 and 98% and mean arterial pressure by 23 and 17%, and decreased heart rate by 27 and 25%, respectively (all at least P < 0.05). The increases in cerebrovascular resistance (as absolute values) induced by endothelin-1 were not affected during either L-NAME or L-NNA (as absolute values and percentages). Intravenous administration of meclofenamate (5 mg kg(-1)) did not change the cerebrovascular effects of endothelin-1 and IRL 1620. In isolated goat cerebral arteries under control, resting conditions, endothelin-1 (10(-11)-10(-7) M) induced concentration-dependent contractions (EC50 = 4.78 X 10(-9) M; maximal contraction = 3177+/-129 mg), whereas IRL 1620 (10(-11)-10(-7) M) produced no effect. This contraction produced by endothelin-1 was competitively blocked by BQ-123 (10(-7)-3 X 10(-6) M), and was not affected by BQ-788 (10(-6) and 10(-5) M). L-NAME (10(-4) M), meclofenamate (10(-5) M), indomethacin (10(-5) M), L-NAME (10(-4) M) plus meclofenamate (10(-5) M) and phosphoramidon (10(-4) M) did not affect the contraction in response to endothelin-1. Endothelium removal increased the response to endothelin-1, as well as the BQ-123 antagonism against endothelin-1 (pA2 values, 7.62 vs. 6.88; P < 0.01). In both intact and de-endothelized arteries precontracted with prostaglandin F2alpha endothelin-1 induced a further contraction, and IRL 1620 caused no effect. These results suggest that: (1) endothelin-1 produces cerebral vasoconstriction by activating endothelin ET(A) receptors probably located in smooth muscle; (2) endothelin ET(B) receptors, nitric oxide and prostanoids might be not involved in the cerebrovascular action of endothelin-1, and (3) endothelium removal may increase cerebrovascular reactivity by increasing sensitivity of endothelin ET(A) receptors to endothelin-1.     

Endothelin-1-(1-31), a novel vasoactive peptide, increases [Ca2+]i in human coronary artery smooth muscle cells

We have previously found that human chymase cleaves big endothelins at the Tyr31-Gly32 bond and produces 31-amino acid long endothelins-(1-31), without any further degradation products. In this study, we investigated the effect of synthetic endothelin-1-(1-31) on the intracellular free Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i) in cultured human coronary artery smooth muscle cells. Endothelin-1-(1-31) increased [Ca2+]i in a concentration-dependent manner (10(-14) to 10(-10) M). This endothelin-1-(1-31)-induced [Ca2+]i increase was not affected by phosphoramidon (N-(alpha-Rhamnopyranosyloxyhydroxyphosphinyl)-L-Leucyl-L-Tryptoph an), an inhibitor of endothelin-converting enzyme. It was, however, inhibited by 10(-10) M BQ123 (Cyclo-(-D-Trp-D-Asp(ONa)-Pro-D-Val-Leu-)), an endothelin ET(A) receptor antagonist, but not by 10(-10) M BQ788 (N-cis-2,6-dimethylpiperidinocarbonyl-L-yMeLeu-D-Trp(COOM e)-D-Nle-ONa), an endothelin ET(B) receptor antagonist. These results suggest that endothelin-1-(1-31) by itself exhibits vasoactive properties probably through endothelin ET(A) receptors. Since human chymase has been reported to play a role in atherosclerosis, endothelin-1-(1-31) may be one of the candidate substances for its cause.     

Endothelin receptors mediating contraction of rat and human pulmonary resistance arteries: effect of chronic hypoxia in the rat

1. We examined the endothelin (ET) receptors mediating contractions to ET-1, ET-3 and sarafotoxin S6c (SX6c) in rat pulmonary resistance arteries by use of peptide and non-peptide ET receptor antagonists. Changes induced by pulmonary hypertension were examined in the chronically hypoxic rat. The effect of the mixed ET(A)/ET(B) receptor antagonist SB 209670 on endothelin-mediated contraction was also examined in human pulmonary resistance arteries. 2. In rat vessels, the order of potency for the endothelin agonists was SX6c = ET-3 > ET-1 (pEC50 values in control rats: 9.12+/-0.10, 8.76+/-0.14 and 8.12+/-0.04, respectively). Maximum contractions induced by ET-3 and ET-1 were increased in vessels from chronically hypoxic rats. 3. The ET(A) receptor antagonist FR 139317 (1 microM) had no effect on the potency of ET-1 in any vessel studied but abolished the increased response to ET-1 in the chronically hypoxic vessels. The ET(A) receptor antagonist BMS 182874 (1 microM) increased the potency of ET-1 in control rat vessels without effecting potency in the pulmonary hypertensive rat vessels. 4. Bosentan (non-peptide mixed ET(A)/ET(B) receptor antagonist) increased the potency of ET-1 in control rat vessels but was without effect in the pulmonary hypertensive rat vessels. Bosentan (1 microM) inhibited responses to SX6c in control and chronically hypoxic rat vessels with pKb values of 5.84 and 6.11, respectively. The ET(B) receptor antagonist BQ-788 (1 microM) did not inhibit responses to ET-1 in any vessel tested but did inhibit responses to both SX6c and ET-3 (pKb values in control and chronically hypoxic rat vessels respectively: SX6c 7.15 and 7.22; ET-3: 6.68 and 6.89). BQ-788 (1 microM) added with BMS 182874 (10 microM) did not inhibit responses to ET-1 in control vessels but caused a significant inhibition of responses to ET-1 in chronically hypoxic preparations. 5. SB 209670 inhibited responses to ET-1 in both control and chronically hypoxic vessels with pKb values of 7.36 and 7.39, respectively. SB 209670 (0.1 and 1 microM) virtually abolished responses to ET-1 in the human pulmonary resistance artery. 6. In conclusion, in rat pulmonary resistance arteries, vasoconstrictions induced by ET-1, SX6c and ET-3 are mediated predominantly by activation of an ET(B)-like receptor. However, lack of effect of some antagonists on ET-1 induced vasoconstriction suggests that ET-1 stimulates an atypical ET(B) receptor. The increase in potency of ET-1 in the presence of some antagonists suggests the presence of an inhibitory ET(A)-like receptor. The influence of this is reduced, or absent, in the chronically hypoxic rats. Increased responses to ET-1 are observed in the chronically hypoxic rat and may be mediated by increased activation of ET(A) receptors. SB 209670 is unique in its potency against responses to ET-1 in both control and chronically hypoxic rats, as well as human, isolated pulmonary resistance arteries.     

Teratocarcinosarcoma of the paranasal sinuses: a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study

We observed endothelin (ET)-induced contractile responses on prostatic and epididymal segments, as well as the facilitation of an electrically stimulated tone on prostatic segments of isolated rat vas deferens. In both segments, the selective ET(B)-receptor agonists, IRL 1620 and sarafotoxin S6c, produced only a small contraction or no contraction at a concentration of 1 microM. The rank order of contraction potencies (pD2 value) was ET-1 = ET-2 > ET-3 > sarafotoxin S6c = IRL 1620. The maximum responses of ET-induced contractions in the prostatic segments were larger than those in the epididymal segments. The contractile response to ET-3 was antagonized by pretreatment for 30 min with BQ-123 (10 nM), a selective ET(A) receptor antagonist, and BQ-788 (1 microM), a selective ET(B) receptor antagonist. The contractile responses to ET-1 were antagonized by pretreatment with BQ-123 (10 microM), but not with BQ-788 (1 microM). The ET-3-induced facilitation on the twitch response to electrical stimulation in the prostatic segment of the vas deferens was antagonized by BQ-123 (0.1 microM) and BQ-788 (1 microM). The ET-1-induced facilitation was antagonized by pretreatment with BQ-123 (3 microM), but not with BQ-788 (10 microM). These results suggest that in rat vas deferens the ET(A) receptors are divided into BQ-123-sensitive ET(A1) and BQ-123-insensitive ET(A2) subtypes, and the production of a contractile response of smooth muscle as well as the facilitation of neurotransmission are accomplished through mediation by ET(A1)- and ET(A2)-subtypes.     

Pharmacological characterization of endothelin-induced contraction in the guinea-pig oesophageal muscularis mucosae

1. In the oesophageal muscularis mucosae, we examined the effects of endothelin-1 (ET-1), endothelin-2 (ET-2), endothelin-3 (ET-3) and sarafotoxin S6c (SX6c) as agonists, and FR139317, BQ-123 and RES-701-1 as endothelin receptor antagonists. 2. All of the endothelins produced tonic contractions which were frequently superimposed on rhythmic motility in a concentration-dependent manner. The order of potency (-log EC50) was ET-1 (8.61)=SX6c (8.65)>ET-2 (8.40)>ET-3 (8.18). 3. FR139317 (1-3 microM) and BQ-123 (1 microM) caused parallel rightward shifts of the concentration-response curve to ET-1, but at higher concentrations caused no further shift. RES-701-1 (3 microM) caused a rightward shift of the concentration-response curve to ET-1, while RES-701-1 (10 microM) had no additional effect. RES-701-1 (0.1-1 microM) concentration-dependently caused a rightward shift of the concentration-response curve to SX6c. The contraction to ET-1 (10 nM) in preparations desensitized to the actions of SX6c was greatly inhibited by pretreatment with FR139317 (10 microM). 4. Modulation of the Ca2+ concentration in the Krebs solution caused the concentration-response curve to ET-1 or SX6c to shift to the right and downward as external Ca2+ concentrations decreased. Verapamil (30 microM) abolished rhythmic motility induced by ET-1 or SX6c. Ni2+ (0.1 mM) weakly inhibited ET-1- or SX6c-induced tonic contraction. SK&F 96365 (60 microM) completely inhibited ET-1-induced contractions. 5. We conclude that there are two types of ET-receptors, excitatory ET(A)- and ET(B)-receptors in the oesophageal muscularis mucosae. These receptors mediate tonic contractions predominantly by opening receptor-operated Ca2+ channels (ROCs) and partly by opening T-type Ca2+ channels, and mediate rhythmic motility by opening L-type Ca2+ channels.     

The mechanism of myometrial contractions induced by endothelin-1 in rat

Experiments were performed to characterize endothelin-1-induced contractions and the role of endothelin (ET) receptor subtypes in rat myometrium. The binding sites of [(125)I]-ET-1 were saturable with high affinity. Scatchard plot analysis revealed that ET-1 binding sites in the myometrium constituted a single population. The dissociation equilibrium constant (Kd) and the maximum binding sites (Bmax) were determined to be 48.9+/-3.0 pM and 1364.0+/-210.3 fmol/mg protein respectively. Specific [(125)I]-ET-1 binding was inhibited completely by unlabelled ET-1 and Ro 46-2005 (mixed-type ET receptor antagonist), but not fully (90.7+/-1.4%) by BQ 123 (a selective ETA receptor antagonist), and not at all by RES 701-1 (a selective ETB receptor antagonist). ET-1 induced myometrial contractions were composed of two types, an increase in resting tone and rhythmic contractions. These contractions were inhibited by BQ 123 and Ro 46-2005, but not by RES 701-1. ET-1-induced contractions were greatly reduced in Ca2+-free Krebs' solution. Nifedipine abolished the rhythmic contractions without affecting the increase in resting tone. These results suggest that ETA receptors are predominantly localized in rat myometrium and that excitation of ETA receptors evokes two types of contractions by increasing the cytoplasmic Ca2+ concentration.     

EndothelinB receptors in rabbit pulmonary resistance arteries: effect of left ventricular dysfunction

The endothelin (ET) receptor that mediates vasoconstriction of the isolated rabbit pulmonary resistance artery was characterized using selective ET receptor agonists and antagonists. We also examined changes in ET-induced vasoconstriction brought about by left ventricular dysfunction using the rabbit coronary ligation model. The rank order of potency for contraction was sarafotoxin S6c (S6c) > ET-1 = ET-3, which is characteristic of an ETB-like receptor. The combined ETA/ETB receptor antagonist SB209670 (1 microM) antagonized responses to ET-1 and S6c with estimated pKb values of 6.8 +/- 0.2 and 7.8 +/- 0.2, respectively. BQ788 (1 microM) antagonized responses to S6c and ET-3 (but not ET-1) with estimated pKb values of 7.1 +/- 0.2 and 6.6 +/- 0.1, respectively. The ETA receptor antagonist FR139317 (1 microM), either alone or in combination with BQ788, did not inhibit responses to ET-1. The profile of the ET-1 response was not altered by left ventricular dysfunction. In control rabbits, the inhibitor of nitric oxide synthase N omega-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (100 microM) had no significant effect on the potency of either ET-1 or S6c. In the coronary-ligated rabbits, however, it significantly increased the potency (10-15-fold) of both ET-1 and S6c. These results suggest that the ET receptor that mediates contraction in rabbit pulmonary resistance arteries has the characteristics of an ETB-like receptor. The responses to ET-1 are not altered by LVD but may be modified by increased release of nitric oxide.     

Endothelin-1 induces vasoconstriction and nitric oxide release via endothelin ET(B) receptors in isolated perfused rat liver

Endothelin-1 (0.1, 1 and 10 nM) induced a significant increase in portal pressure and nitric oxide (NO) release in the isolated rat liver. The endothelin ET(B) receptor agonist, IRL 1620 (Suc-[Glu9,Ala(11,15)]endothelin-1-(8-21)) (0.1, 1 and 10 nM) also elicited a marked increase in portal pressure and NO release. The potency of endothelin-1 was higher than that of IRL 1620. The endothelin ET(A) receptor antagonist, BQ-123 (cyclo(-D-Trp-D-Asp-Pro-D-Val-Leu)) (1 and 10 microM), had no effect on the endothelin-1-induced change in portal pressure and NO current. In contrast, the endothelin ET(B) receptor antagonist, BQ-788 (N-cis-2,6-dimethylpiperidinocarbonyl-L-gamma-methyl-leucyl-D-1-++ +methoxycarbonyltryptophanyl-D-norleucine) (1 and 10 nM), attenuated the endothelin-1-induced change in portal pressure and NO current. Administration of N(G)-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA), a NO synthase inhibitor, completely abolished the endothelin-1- or IRL 1620-induced NO release. L-NMMA enhanced the increase in portal pressure and decrease in O2 consumption caused by endothelin-1. These results indicated that endothelin ET(B) receptors mediate both vasoconstriction and NO release and that NO plays a significant role in stabilizing microcirculation in isolated perfused rat liver.     

Characterization of endothelin receptors in the human umbilical artery and vein

The aim of the present study was to characterize pharmacologically endothelin receptors that are present in human umbilical vessels. 2. Endothelin-1 (ET-1) and endothelin-2 (ET-2) are potent stimulants of both the human umbilical artery (pEC50 7.9 and 7.5) and vein (pEC50 8.1 and 8.0). Endothelin-3 (ET-3) is inactive on the artery but contracts the vein (pEC50 7.6). IRL1620 is inactive in both vessels. The order of potency of agonists is suggestive of a typical ET(A) receptor in the artery (ET-1 = ET-2 > > ET-3) and a mixture of ET(A) and ET(B) receptors in the vein (ET-1 = ET-2 > or = ET-3). 3. The selective ET(A) receptor antagonist, BQ123, competitively inhibits the effect of ET-1 in the human umbilical artery (pA2 6.9), while in the vein, only a mixture of BQ123 and BQ788 (a selective ET(B) antagonist) weakly displaces to the right of the cumulative concentration-response curve to ET-1. Contractions induced by ET-3 in the vein are inhibited by BQ788 (pA2 7.6), but not by BQ123. 4. Inhibition of Ca2+ channels by nifedipine (0.1 microM) is accompanied by a significant decrease of the maximal response to ET-1 by 40% in the artery and by 30% in the vein. The response of the vein to ET-3 is almost abolished by nifedipine. 5. The results indicate that: (i) endothelins contract the human isolated umbilical artery via stimulation of an ET(A) receptor type; (ii) the contraction induced by ET-1 in the vein is mediated by both ET(A) and ET(B) receptors, while ET-3 stimulates the ET(B) receptor; (iii) the contribution of Ca2+ channels to the contraction mediated by the ET(B) receptor appears to be more important than to that mediated by the ET(A) receptor.     

Contribution of endogenous endothelin-1 to the maintenance of vascular tone: role of nitric oxide

Studies were designed to compare the effect of the nitric oxide inhibitor, N omega-nitro-L-arginine (L-NNA), and the novel ETB receptor antagonist, RES-701-1, on changes in blood pressure and renal blood flow induced by exogenous endothelin receptor agonists and to determine the effect of L-NNA on basal hemodynamics in conscious, chronically instrumented rats. Infusion of low (nonpressor) doses of L-NNA or RES-701-1 potentiated systemic and renal vasoconstriction induced by bolus injections of endothelin-1 or sarafotoxin 6c. Bolus intravenous injection or sustained infusion of L-NNA alone resulted in dose-dependent increases in blood pressure and decreases in renal blood flow, similar to our recently reported results with RES-701-1. Vasoconstriction induced by inhibition of nitric oxide was attenuated by SB 209670, a mixed ETA/B receptor antagonist, but not by BQ123, an ETA receptor antagonist; neither antagonist altered basal hemodynamics. Collectively, the results indicate that: (1) endothelin plays an important role in the control of basal vascular tone by mediating both vasodilation and vasoconstriction; (2) these effects are mediated by different ETB receptor subtypes in the rat, one located on the endothelium that mediates vasodilation via the nitric oxide pathway, the other located on the vascular smooth muscle that mediates contraction.     

Binding of the nonpeptide antagonist, SB 209670, to endothelin receptors on cultured neurons

We studied the binding characteristics of a novel, nonpeptide endothelin antagonist, SB 209670, to two subtypes of endothelin (ET) receptor in cultured rat cerebellar granule cell neurons. Displacement binding studies of [125I]ET-1 performed in the presence of the ETB receptor-selective agonist, sarafotoxin 6c (S6c), allowed us to measure a Ki of 4.0 +/- 1.5 nM for (+/-)SB 209670 at the ETA receptor (n = 4). Similarly, binding studies in the presence of the ETA receptor-selective antagonist, BQ123, allowed us to measure a Ki of 46 +/- 14 nM for (+/-)SB 209670 at the ETB receptor (n = 4). These studies indicate that the novel endothelin antagonist, SB 209670, has high affinity for both types of neuronal endothelin receptor.     

Effects of Ro 47-0203 and PD155080 on the plasma kinetics, receptor binding and vascular effects of endothelin in the pig

The effects of the mixed endothelin ET(A)/endothelin ET(B) receptor antagonist Ro 47-0203 (bosentan, 4-tert-butyl-N-[6-(2-hydroxy-ethoxy)-5-( 2-methoxy -phenoxy)-2,2'-bipyrimidin-4-yl] -benzenesulfonamide) and the selective endothelin ET(A) receptor antagonist PD155080 (sodium 2-benzo[1,3]dioxol-5-yl-3-benzyl-4-(4-me thoxy-phenyl)-4-oxobut+ ++-2-enoate) on plasma half-life and regional extraction of exogenous endothelin-1 as well as on the regional vascular effects of endothelin-1 were investigated in the pig in vivo. Bosentan but not PD155080 (5 mg/kg, i.v. bolus, both drugs) increased the arterial plasma levels of endothelin-1-like immunoreactivity. Neither of the drugs affected the plasma half-life of infused endothelin-1. In the spleen, both the extraction and vascular effects of exogenous endothelin-1 were attenuated by both bosentan and PD155080 whereas renal extraction and vascular effects in the kidney were unaffected by both drugs. In the lung, only bosentan decreased pulmonary extraction of endothelin-1. In conclusion, the bosentan-induced increase of circulating endothelin-1 seems to be related to blockade of endothelin-1 binding to endothelin ET(B) receptors. Blockade of these receptors does not influence the overall elimination of endothelin-1, however.     

Endopeptidase 24.11 inhibition does not modify uterotonic effects of endothelins in rat uterus

We investigated effects of the endopeptidase 24.11 inhibitor, SCH 39370, on uterotonic effects of endothelins (ETs) and sarafotoxin S6b. Responses of uteri from non-pregnant rats were inhibited by the ETA receptor antagonist, BQ123 (1 microM) but not the ETB receptor antagonist, BQ 788 (1 microM). ET-1, sarafotoxin S6b and ET-2 were more potent than ET-3 in tissues from non-pregnant and pregnant rats. SCH 39370 (10 microM) did not affect uterotonic responses to these peptides in either group, but inhibited those of big ET-1 in non-pregnant rat tissues, indicating inhibition of conversion of big ET-1 to ET-1. These data indicate that endopeptidase 24.11 does not inactivate the endothelin peptides in the rat uterus.