Diabetes mellitus increases the severity of anemia in non-dialyzed patients with renal failure

Therapeutic means for patients with disseminated painful bone metastases in breast cancer are strongly limited. There is a big need of an effective and well tolerated therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of rhenium-186 HEDP for pain palliation in patients with bone metastases in breast cancer. 17 patients with painful bone metastases taking analgesics received one or more injections of 1295 MB9 rhenium-186 HEDP. In 59% of the patients the therapy resulted in a significant reduction of pain. The duration of pain relief partially hold on up to nine weeks. The main side effects of therapy were a short decrease of platelets and leucocytes and an increase of pain for 1-2 days. As conclusion we found out that therapy with rhenium-186 HEDP can be used complementarily to analgesic therapy and radiation in patients with painful disseminated bone metastases in breast cancer.     

Treatment of cancer-related pain: when orally administered medications fail

OBJECTIVE: To summarize the available pain-relieving interventions other than oral medications for cancer-related pain. DESIGN: The pertinent literature is reviewed, and the various options for treating pain in patients with cancer are discussed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The appropriate situations for use of parenteral administration of opioids, spinal analgesia, neural blockade, and neurosurgical treatment are outlined, and the potential problems and complications associated with these techniques are described. RESULTS: The basic approach to the management of pain in patients with cancer is to begin treatment with less potent analgesic agents early and to progress toward use of more potent pharmaceutical agents, adjuvant drugs, and invasive procedures as needed for alleviation of pain. With parenteral administration of opioids, the dosage can be adjusted rapidly, and therapy can be continued even though a patient may have gastrointestinal dysfunction. A portable ambulatory infusion pump can be used in selected patients. The major advantage of spinal opioid analgesia is the intense analgesia provided with minimal side effects. The potential complications and the availability of treatment alternatives have limited the use of neurolytic blocks, which usually provide only temporary relief of pain. In carefully selected patients with pancreatic or other upper gastrointestinal neoplasms, however, neurolytic celiac plexus and splanchnic nerve blocks are effective. Patients who fail to respond to conservative interventions may be candidates for neurosurgical procedures, such as spinal cord, cortical, or brain-stem stimulation or neuroablative operations (most commonly, cordotomy). CONCLUSION: Cancer-related pain continues to be a major problem, and clinicians should be aware of the availability of effective treatment strategies and techniques. When orally administered medications fail to control pain or cause excessive side effects, patients should be referred to an appropriate specialist or medical center for consideration of other pain-relieving techniques.     

Current use of bisphosphonates in oncology. International Bone and Cancer Study Group

PURPOSE: The purpose of this article is to review the recent data on bisphosphonate use in oncology and to provide some guidelines on the indications for their use in cancer patients. DESIGN: The group consensus reached by experts on the rationale for the use of bisphosphonates in cancer patients and their current indications for the treatment of tumor-induced hypercalcemia and metastatic bone pain in advanced disease and for the prevention of the complications of multiple myeloma and of metastatic bone disease are reviewed. RESULTS: Bisphosphonates are potent inhibitors of tumor-induced osteoclast-mediated bone resorption. They now constitute the standard treatment for cancer hypercalcemia, for which we recommend a dose of 1,500 mg of clodronate or 90 mg of pamidronate; the latter compound is more potent and has a longer lasting effect. Intravenous bisphosphonates exert clinically relevant analgesic effects in patients with metastatic bone pain. Regular pamidronate infusions can also achieve a partial objective response by conventional International Union Against Cancer criteria and enhance the objective response rate to chemotherapy. In breast cancer, the prolonged administration of oral clodronate 1,600 mg daily reduces the frequency of morbid skeletal events by more than one fourth, whereas monthly pamidronate infusions of 90 mg for only 1 year in addition to chemotherapy reduce by more than one third the frequency of all skeletal-related events. The use of bisphosphonates to prevent bone metastases remains experimental. Last, bisphosphonates in addition to chemotherapy are superior to chemotherapy alone in patients with stages II and III multiple myeloma and can reduce the skeletal morbidity rate by approximately one half. CONCLUSION: Bisphosphonate use is a major therapeutic advance in the management of the skeletal morbidity caused by metastatic breast cancer or multiple myeloma, although many questions remain unanswered, notably regarding the optimal selection of patients and the duration of treatment.     

Strontium-89 for palliation of pain from bone metastases in patients with prostate and breast cancer

We have used strontium-89 chloride (89Sr) for the palliative treatment of metastatic bone pain. Seventy-six patients (50 males with prostate carcinoma and 26 females with breast cancer) were treated with 148 MBq of 89Sr. Sixteen patients were retreated, receiving two or three doses; the total number of injected doses was consequently 95. The Karnofsky performance status was assessed and pain and analgesia were scored on scales of 9 and 5 points, respectively. The efficacy of 89Sr was evaluated at 3 months of treatment. Three levels of response were considered: good - when there was an increase in the Karnofsky status and a decrease in the pain score (equal to or higher than 4) or analgesic score (equal to or higher than 1); partial - when there was an increase in the Karnofsky status and a decrease in the pain score (2 or 3 points) without significant changes in the analgesic score; no response - if no variation or deterioration in these parameters was observed. In prostate cancer patients, the response was good in 64% of cases and partial in 25%, and there was no response in the remaining 11%. In breast cancer patients, the response was good in 62% of cases and partial in 31%, and there was no response in the remaining 8%. Duration of the response ranged from 3 to 12 months (mean 6 months). In the patients who were retreated the effectiveness was as good as after the first dose of 89Sr. A decrease in the initial leucocyte and platelet counts was observed after the 1st month of treatment, with a gradual partial to complete recovery within 6 months. It is concluded that 89Sr is an effective agent in palliative therapy for metastatic bone pain in patients with prostate or breast carcinoma. If required, retreatment can be administered safely and with the same efficacy as is achieved by the first dose.     

Factors associated with refractory cancer pain

Cancer pain can be effectively controlled in most patients by classical pharmacological treatment. We retrospectively studied the characteristics and factors associated with non responsive pain. Between 1989 and 1996, 1767 patients were referred to our pain center; 831 (47%) had cancer pain and from 787 evaluable cases 118 (15%) experienced non-controlled pain whereas good pain control was achieved within a few days in 669 (85%) patients. Gender, age, cancer type, metastasis, initial pain intensity, nociceptive or neuropathic components and administration of adjuvant therapies were similar in both groups. On the other hand, diffuse pain, abdominal pain, terminal care, near death and doses of strong opioids were significantly different. Factors associated with therapeutic failure were conflicts, life and complications and breakthrough pain. In the presence of refractory cancer pain the factors predictive of therapeutic failure should be identified in order to optimize individual pain treatment.     

Nursing science in German--current status and future prospects

Metastatic bone disease is a frequent cause of morbidity in advanced cancer patients with a subsequent high incidence of skeletal complications (fractures, hypercalcemia, spinal cord compression) and severe pain. The osteolytic process is mainly characterized by an osteoclastic activity of bone resorption and inflammatory activity provoked by various cytokines and prostaglandins. Bisphosphonates represent a new class of drugs with inhibitory activity on bone resorption and on inflammatory processes which revealed themselves to be efficacious in a series of clinical conditions such as tumour-induced hypercalcemia, Paget's disease, osteoporosis and metastatic bone disease. The aim of this review of the literature is to show the analgesic efficacy of the different bisphosphonates in phase III studies carried out on patients with metastatic bone disease. Medline and Cancerlit database from January 1984 to February 1998 have been considered. From the analysis of the published studies it appears that bisphosphonates and, in particular, intravenous Disodium Pamidronate, are not only able to slow down the progression of the disease and to reduce the onset of skeletal complications but also have an analgesic effect and the possibility of improving the quality of life, above all in patients with osteolytic metastases due to breast cancer and multiple myeloma. Bisphosphonates represent a further valid therapy to add to an already consolidated list of therapies such as radio, chemo and endocrine therapy, analgesic drugs, orthopaedic and physiatric in the pain management of patients with bone metastases. These drugs meet with the patients' compliance, are well-tolerated as well as having a good cost/efficacy profile. It still remains to be seen if the newer and more potent bisphosphonates such as Ibandronate and Zoledronate can be administered differently from the intravenous route such as by mouth or by patch which are readily accepted by the patient and, moreover, if these more potent drugs are able to prevent or delay the onset and/or the progression of bone metastases.     

The uteroplacental prolactin family and pregnancy

We have characterized the LCC15-MB cell line which was recently derived from a breast carcinoma metastasis resected from the femur of a 29-year-old woman. LCC15-MB cells are vimentin (VIM) positive, exhibit a stellate morphology in routine cell culture, and form penetrating colonies when embedded in three-dimensional gels of Matrigel or fibrillar collagen. They show high levels of activity in the Boyden chamber chemomigration and chemoinvasion assays, and like other invasive human breast cancer (HBC) cell lines, LCC15-MB cells activate matrix-metalloproteinase-2 in response to treatment with concanavalin A. In addition, these cells are tumorigenic when implanted subcutaneously in nude mice and recolonize bone after arterial injection. Interestingly, both the primary lesion and the bone metastasis from which LCC15-MB were derived, as well as the resultant cell line, abundantly express the bone matrix protein osteopontin (OPN). OPN is also expressed by the highly metastatic MDA-MB-435 cells, but not other invasive or noninvasive HBC cell lines. Expression of OPN is retained in the subcutaneous xenograft and intraosseous metastases of LCC15-MB as detected by immunohistochemistry. Both VIM and OPN expression have been associated with breast cancer invasion and metastasis, and their expression by the LCC15-MB cell line is consistent with its derivation from a highly aggressive breast cancer. These cells provide a useful model for studying molecular mechanisms important for breast cancer metastasis to bone and, in particular, the implication(s) of OPN and VIM expression in this process.     

Remission of bone metastases after combined chemotherapy and radionuclide therapy with Re-186 HEDP

A patient with disseminated osseous metastases due to breast cancer reported multifocal pain. Because of persisting pain after a first cycle of chemotherapy, 1,295 MBq Re-186 HEDP was administered intravenously. Excellent pain relief was observed. Subsequently, the patient received further combined chemotherapy and Re-186 HEDP therapy and remained pain free. Tc-99m MDP bone imaging showed a significant regression of osseous metastases. It may be speculated that the combination of Re-186 HEDP and chemotherapy results in significantly increased palliation of metastatic bone disease.     

Pamidronate infusions as single-agent therapy for bone metastases: a phase II trial in patients with breast cancer

Pamidronate is a potent biphosphonate which modulates tumour-induced osteolysis (TIO) by inhibiting osteoclast-mediated bone resorption. In a phase II trial, 69 breast cancer patients with symptomatic progressive bone metastases were given infusions of pamidronate 60 mg over 1 or 4 h every 2 weeks for a maximum of 13 infusions or until progressive disease (PD) at any site. No other systemic anticancer therapy was allowed. Pain was measured using a visual analogue scale, mobility using a detailed eight-point questionnaire and analgesic intake using a six-point scale. Improvements in pain, mobility and analgesic scores occurred in 61, 50 and 30% of patients, respectively, with 33, 21 and 16% achieving a 40% improvement for > or = 8 weeks. At trial discontinuation, baseline levels of pain and mobility had improved by 27% (P = 0.001) and 20% (P = 0.004), respectively, despite a one category reduction in analgesic intake in 27% of patients. Using this relatively high dose of pamidronate, symptomatic response was independent of the number of bone metastases and also of infusion rate. The infusions were well tolerated with no major toxicities reported. Pamidronate infusions provide useful palliation for breast cancer patients with symptomatic bone metastases.     

Radiation therapy in the management of symptomatic bone metastases: the effect of total dose and histology on pain relief and response duration

PURPOSE: In order to better define variables and factors that may influence the pain response to radiation, and to look for a radiation regimen that can assure the highest percentage and the longest duration of pain relief, we performed a prospective, although not randomized, study on patients with bone metastases from various primary sites. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From December 1988 to March 1994, 205 patients with a total of 255 solitary or multiple bone metastases from several primary tumors were treated in our radiotherapy center with palliative intent. Irradiation fields were treated with three main fractionation schedules: (1) Conventional fractionation: 40-46 Gy/20-23 fractions in 5-5.5 weeks; (2) Short course: 30-36 Gy/10-12 fractions in 2-2.3 weeks; (3) Fast course: 8-28 Gy/1-4 consecutive fractions. Pain intensity was self-assessed by patients using a visual analogic scale graduated from 0 (no pain) to 10 (the strongest pain one can experience). Analgesic requirement was assessed by using a five-point scale, scoring both analgesic strength and frequency (0 = no drug or occasional nonopioids; 1 = Nonopioids once daily; 2 = Nonopioids more than once daily; 3 = Mild opioids (oral codeine, pentazocine, etc.), once daily; 4 = Mild opioids more than once daily; 5 = Strong opioids (morphine, meperidine, etc.). Complete pain relief meant the achievement of a score < or = 2 in the pain scale or 0 in the analgesic requirement scale. Partial pain relief indicated a score of 3 to 4 or of 1 to 2 on the former and latter scale, respectively. RESULTS: Total pain relief (complete + partial) was observed in 195 (76%) sites, in 158 of which (62%) a complete response was obtained. Metastases from NSC lung tumors appeared to be the least responsive among all primary tumors, with 46% complete pain relief in comparison to 65% and 83% complete relief in breast (p = 0.04) and in prostate metastases (p = 0.002), respectively. A significant difference in pain relief was detected among the several ranges of total dose delivered to the painful metastases, with 81%, 65%, and 46% complete relief rates in the 40-46 Gy, 30-36 Gy (p = 0.03), and 8-28 Gy (p = 0.0001) dose ranges respectively. A straight correlation between total dose and complete pain relief was confirmed by the curve calculated by the logistic model which shows that doses of 30 Gy or more are necessary to achieve complete pain relief in 70% or more of bone metastases. This correlation holds also for the duration of pain control, as shown by the actuarial analysis of time to pain progression. Multivariate analyses, with complete pain relief and time to pain progression as endpoints show a highly significant effect of radiation dose (p = 0.0007) and performance status (p = 0.003), with lower rates of complete pain relief and shorter time to pain progression observed after smaller radiation total doses or higher Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scores. CONCLUSION: Although single-dose or short course irradiation is an attractive treatment in reducing the number of multiple visits to radiotherapy departments for patients with painful bone metastases, it is nevertheless clear that aggressive protracted treatments seem to offer significant advantages especially for patients in whom the expected life span is not short.     

The effect of clotrimazole on the pathogen of toxoplasmosis, Toxoplasma gondii

A previous study showed activity of megestrol acetate in advanced breast cancer; as a result the study was expanded. Of 101 patients treated with this compound, 26 (26%) met our criteria of improvement. The drug was well tolerated and produced no toxicity and, as opposed to androgens and estrogens, no endocrine effects were observed. Prior hormonal or cytotoxic compounds, including alkylating agents, did not appear to reduce the subsequent responsiveness to this potent progestational compound. We now include it, often as the initial hormonal trial in postmenopausal patients, in our sequential treatment of disseminated breast cancer because of its favorable therapeutic ratio.     

The concept of rehabilitation of cancer patients

The scope of supportive care and cancer rehabilitation is very wide and heterogeneous. In this review we focus on nutritional aspects, sexual and gonadal function, psychological rehabilitation, treatment of cancer pain, and rehabilitation of patients with bone metastases. The anorexia-cachexia syndrome is a particularly frequent manifestation of cancer that profoundly affects body image and significantly impairs quality of life of cancer patients. However, enteral feeding through nasogastric tubes, gastrostomies, or jejunostomies is an efficient method for providing long-term enteral nutrition at home and for contributing to complete rehabilitation after cancer therapy. Recent effort has focused on nutritional pharmacology and on the optimalization of the use of appetite-stimulating drugs, such as progestational agents. The psychological components of cancer, anticancer therapy, and quality of life have now been widely recognized and studied. Effective pharmacological and psychotherapeutic interventions help patients and their family to better adjust to the chronic stress of cancer, but more specific determinants of psychological morbidity should be developed. In particular, the safe and efficient use of the most recent classes of antidepressants and anxiolytics should be urgently studied. More than 90% of cancer patients present one or more pain syndromes during their illness. The adequate use of drugs is the cornerstone of treatment. The development on new molecules and new routes of administration opens interesting perspectives for cancer pain control. Bone metastases are the source of considerable morbidity. Intravenous bisphosphonates have been successfully used for the treatment of the symptoms of metastatic bone disease, especially bone pain. Moreover, monthly pamidronate infusions in addition to chemotherapy reduce the mean skeletal morbidity rate by more than one third and contribute to the rehabilitation of cancer patients with bone metastases from breast cancer or with multiple myeloma.     

Ketorolac. A reappraisal of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use in pain management

Ketorolac is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) with strong analgesic activity. The analgesic efficacy of ketorolac has been extensively evaluated in the postoperative setting, in both hospital inpatients and outpatients, and in patients with various other acute pain states. After major abdominal, orthopaedic or gynaecological surgery or ambulatory laparoscopic or gynaecological procedures, ketorolac provides relief from mild to severe pain in the majority of patients and has similar analgesic efficacy to that of standard dosages of morphine and pethidine (meperidine) as well as less frequently used opioids and other NSAIDs. The analgesic effect of ketorolac may be slightly delayed but often persists for longer than that of opioids. Combined therapy with ketorolac and an opioid results in a 25 to 50% reduction in opioid requirements, and in some patients this is accompanied by a concomitant decrease in opioid-induced adverse events, more rapid return to normal gastrointestinal function and shorter stay in hospital. In children undergoing myringotomy, hernia repair, tonsillectomy, or other surgery associated with mild to moderate pain, ketorolac provides comparable analgesia to morphine, pethidine or paracetamol (acetaminophen). In the emergency department, ketorolac attenuates moderate to severe pain in patients with renal colic, migraine headache, musculoskeletal pain or sickle cell crisis and is usually as effective as frequently used opioids, such as morphine and pethidine, and other NSAIDs and analgesics. Subcutaneous administration of ketorolac reduces pain in patients with cancer and seems particularly beneficial in pain resulting from bone metastases. The acquisition cost of ketorolac is greater than that of morphine or pethidine; however, in a small number of studies, the higher cost of ketorolac was offset when treatment with ketorolac resulted in a reduced hospital stay compared with alternative opioid therapy. The tolerability profile of ketorolac parallels that of other NSAIDs; most clinically important adverse events affect the gastrointestinal tract and/or renal or haematological function. The incidence of serious or fatal adverse events reported with ketorolac has decreased since revision of dosage guidelines. Results from a large retrospective postmarketing surveillance study in more than 20,000 patients demonstrated that the overall risk of gastrointestinal or operative site bleeding related to parenteral ketorolac therapy was only slightly higher than with opioids. However, the risk increased markedly when high dosages were used for more than 5 days, especially in the elderly. Acute renal failure may occur after treatment with ketorolac but is usually reversible on drug discontinuation. In common with other NSAIDs, ketorolac has also been implicated in allergic or hypersensitivity reactions. In summary, ketorolac is a strong analgesic with a tolerability profile which resembles that of other NSAIDs. When used in accordance with current dosage guidelines, this drug provides a useful alternative, or adjuvant, to opioids in patients with moderate to severe pain.     

Metastatic breast cancer presenting as heel pain

The authors present a case of breast cancer metastasizing to the calcaneus that was confirmed by bone biopsy. The patient's complaint of heel pain provided the initial evidence of skeletal metastasis. Metastatic spread of cancer to the hand or foot (acrometastasis) is considered rare. However, the possibility of acrometastasis should be considered in any patient with a history of cancer presenting with skeletal pain, especially if the symptoms do not respond to therapy.     

Pain analysis is vital in rheumatic diseases. Pain often causes much worry to patients

The article consists of a synthesis of a rheumatic pain symposium held at the annual meeting of the Swedish Medical Association in 1996. Various aspects of pain in rheumatic diseases were discussed, such as physiological, neurohumoral and neurogenic mechanisms, sensory stimulation treatment, differentiation of mechanical and inflammatory pain, quality enhancement by improved co-operation between primary and tertiary care facilities, pharmacological treatment with (centrally and peripherally acting) opioids, selective cyclo-oxygenase inhibitors, and NMDA (N-methyl-D-aspartate) receptor antagonists. For patients with rheumatic disorders exacerbated by pain problems, as for other patients, a pain diagnosis is of fundamental importance. This can be achieved by analysis of the social, psychological, physiological and medical factors contributing to the cause and degree of pain and to pain behaviour, and of the extent to which the pain may be nociceptive (i.e., inflammatory, mechanical, or ischaemic in origin), neurogenic or idiopathic. Pain analysis should be followed by individualised treatment focused on the patient's most crucial problems, thus enhancing the prospect of optimal treatment outcome.     

Morphine versus methadone in the pain treatment of advanced-cancer patients followed up at home

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the analgesic and adverse effects and the doses of methadone in comparison to morphine. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective randomized study was performed in a sample of 40 patients with advanced cancer who required strong opioids for their pain management. Patients were treated with sustained-release morphine or methadone in doses titrated against the effect administered two or three times daily according to clinical need. Opioid doses, adjuvant medications, symptoms associated with opioid therapy, pain intensity, and pain mechanisms were recorded. The opioid escalation indices in percentage (OEI%) and milligrams (OEImg) were calculated. The effective analgesic score (EAS) that monitors the analgesic consumption-pain ratio was also calculated at fixed weekly intervals. RESULTS: differences in pain intensity were found. Patients treated with methadone reported values of OEI significantly less than those observed in patients treated with morphine. Seven patients in the methadone group maintained the same initial dosage until death, whereas only one patient in the morphine group did not require opioid dose escalation. A more stable analgesia in time in patients treated with methadone was shown by the low number of gaps in EASs reported. Symptom frequencies and intensities were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSION: Methadone is a drug of indisputable value in the treatment of cancer pain, and an unbalanced focus on the risks of inappropriate use rather than the benefits should not compromise the use of a relevant alternative to morphine in the management of cancer pain.     

Dose-dependent hypocholesterolaemic effect of oyster mushroom (Pleurotus ostreatus) in rats

Chronic treatment with opioids in cancer patients with chronic intestinal obstruction is hazardous, as uncontrolled constipation may result in definitive bowel obstruction. Intermittent use of opioids adjusted for fluctuating pain levels may enable patients to take the lowest opioid doses that will have sufficient effect, with a consequently lower risk of intestinal side effects. Methadone has many pharmacokinetic characteristics that fit it for use in this clinical situation. In two patients with recurrent episodes of bowel obstruction, methadone used at low doses and at flexible intervals regulated by the patients according to their pain level avoided the occurrence of new episodes of intestinal obstruction. Oral patient-controlled analgesia with methadone may be a simple, safe and cheap method of treating patients with pain associated with subtotal intestinal obstruction.     

Bisphosphonates for controlling pain from metastatic bone disease

The rationale for and efficacy of bisphosphonates for pain due to cancer that has metastasized to bone are reviewed. Typical strategies for controlling metastatic bone pain have consisted of opioids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, surgery to stabilize bone, cancer chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and radiopharmaceuticals. Cancer metastasis to bone can produce pain through the release of prostaglandins, bradykinin, substance P, and histamine; growth of tumor into surrounding tissue; stretching of the periosteum; and pathological fractures. It has been suggested that bisphosphonates can benefit these patients by decreasing the amount of pain or decreasing analgesic requirements. Bisphosphonates bind to hydroxyapatite crystals, making it more difficult for osteoclasts to recognize exposed unmineralized bone surfaces, and are directly toxic to osteoclasts. Etidronate disodium, pamidronate disodium, clodronate disodium, and alendronate sodium are bisphosphonates that have been studied in patients with painful bone metastases. Although each of these has shown at least some benefit, the most promising agent appears to be pamidronate, especially the i.v. formulation given monthly. Although oral formulations of this agent have been studied, poor bioavailability and adverse effects limit their usefulness. Adverse effects of bisphosphonates include GI reactions, impairment of renal function, anemia, and electrolyte abnormalities. Bisphosphonates are of some benefit in relieving metastatic bone pain, but the exact role, agent, route, and duration are issues that need further study.     

Bisphosphonate risedronate prevents bone loss in women with artificial menopause due to chemotherapy of breast cancer: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study

PURPOSE: To determine the effectiveness and safety of the bisphosphonate risedronate in preventing bone loss in young women with breast cancer and early menopause induced by chemotherapy who are at major risk for the development of postmenopausal osteoporosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-three white women, aged 36 to 55 years, with breast cancer and artificially induced menopause were stratified according to prior tamoxifen use. Thirty-six patients received tamoxifen (20 mg/d). Within each stratum, patients were randomly assigned to receive risedronate (n = 27) or placebo (n = 26). Treatment consisted of eight cycles oral risedronate 30 mg/d or placebo daily for 2 weeks followed by 10 weeks of no drug (12 weeks per cycle). Patients were monitored for a third year without treatment. RESULTS: Main outcomes of the study were changes in lumbar spine and proximal femur (femoral neck, trochanter, and Ward's triangle) bone mineral density (BMD), and biochemical markers of bone turnover. In contrast to a significant decrease of BMD at the lumbar spine and hip in the placebo group, there was an increase in BMD in the risedronate group. On treatment withdrawal, bone loss ensued, which suggests that treatment needs to be continuous to maintain a protective effect on bone mass. At 2 years, the mean difference (+/- SEM) between groups was 2.5% +/- 1.2%, (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.2 to 4.9) at the lumbar spine (P = .041) and 2.6% +/- 1.1%, (95% CI, 0.3 to 4.8) at the femoral neck (P = .029). Similar results were observed at the hip trochanter. Results by stratum indicate a beneficial, although partial, effect of tamoxifen in reducing bone loss. Risedronate was well tolerated and showed a good safety profile, with no evidence of laboratory abnormalities. CONCLUSION: Risedronate appears to be a safe treatment that prevents both trabecular and cortical bone loss in women with menopause induced by chemotherapy for breast cancer.     

Pain analysis is vital in rheumatic diseases. The pain is often the patient's worst problem

The article consists of a synthesis of a rheumatic pain symposium held at the annual meeting of the Swedish Medical Association in 1996. Various aspects of pain in rheumatic diseases were discussed, such as physiological, neurohumoral and neurogenic mechanisms, sensory stimulation treatment, differentiation of mechanical and inflammatory pain, quality enhancement by improved cooperation between primary and tertiary care facilities, pharmacological treatment with (centrally and peripherally acting) opioids, selective cyclo-oxygenase inhibitors, and NMDA (N-methyl-D-aspartate) receptor antagonists. The aim of the symposium, with its focus on the manifest pain problem, was to improve our knowledge and skill in the understanding and treatment of this large patient category. For patients with rheumatic disorders exacerbated by pain problems, as for other patients, a pain diagnosis is of fundamental importance. This can be achieved by analysis of the social, psychological, physiological and medical factors contributing to the cause and degree of pain and to pain behaviour, and of the extent to which the pain may be nociceptive (i.e., inflammatory, mechanical, or ischaemic in origin), neurogenic or idiopathic. Pain analysis should be followed by individualised treatment focused on the patient's most crucial problems, thus enhancing the prospect of optimal treatment outcome.