The dynamic and steady state behavior of metallocene linear low density polyethylene (m-LLDPE) blended with metallocene high density polyethylene (m-HDPE) and with low density polyethylene (LDPE) were measured in parallel plate rheometer at 160, 180, and 200 °C. The composition dependence of zero shear viscosity η0, the characteristic relaxation time τ0 and the characteristic frequency ω0 of m-LLDPE/m-HDPE blends show a linear variation in the whole range of weight fraction, which indicates that m-LLDPE/m-HDPE blends are miscible blend. At the same time, m-HDPE showing a ‘dissident’ rheological behavior should possess a certain very low degree of LCB. Two calculation methods of LCB verify this point. In contrast, the composition dependence of zero shear viscosity η0 of m-LLDPE/LDPE blends shows a positive deviation from the log-additivity rule, which can be well fitted by using the immiscible blend equation of Utracki. The characteristic relaxation time τ0 and the characteristic frequency ω0 have a sharp variation with the small amounts of LDPE in the blends, which also indicates a phase separation in the system. The thermal properties of m-LLDPE/m-HDPE blends are very similar to a single-component system. However, m-LLDPE/LDPE blends are immiscible in both melt and crystal states. DSC results are consistent with the rheological properties of these two series of blends. 相似文献
The present study investigated mixed polyolefin compositions with the major component being a post‐consumer, milk bottle grade high‐density polyethylene (HDPE) for use in large‐scale injection moldings. Both rheological and mechanical properties of the developed blends are benchmarked against those shown by a currently used HDPE injection molding grade, in order to find a potential composition for its replacement. Possibility of such replacement via modification of recycled high‐density polyethylene (reHDPE) by low‐density polyethylene (LDPE) and linear‐low‐density polyethylene (LLDPE) is discussed. Overall, mechanical and rheological data showed that LDPE is a better modifier for reHDPE than LLDPE. Mechanical properties of reHDPE/LLDPE blends were lower than additive, thus demonstrating the lack of compatibility between the blend components in the solid state. Mechanical properties of reHDPE/LDPE blends were either equal to or higher than calculated from linear additivity. Capillary rheological measurements showed that values of apparent viscosity for LLDPE blends were very similar to those of the more viscous parent in the blend, whereas apparent viscosities of reHDPE/LDPE blends depended neither on concentration nor on type (viscosity) of LDPE. Further rheological and thermal studies on reHDPE/LDPE blends indicated that the blend constituents were partially miscible in the melt and cocrystallized in the solid state. 相似文献
The physicomechanical properties of polymer blend formulations comprising different grades of metallocene-catalyzed linear low-density polyethylenes (mLLDPEs) with high-density polyethylenes (HDPEs) or a low-density polyethylene (LDPE) were investigated. For blends with HDPE, the addition of mLLDPE improves the Izod impact strength and some tensile properties. For blends with LDPE, adding mLLDPE increases the ductility and the percent elongation at break. 相似文献
Thermo-oxidative degradation of the blends of polypropylene (PP) with metallocene linear low density polyethylene (mLLDPE), has been examined. The samples were exposed in the air-oven for a period of 120 days at 150°C. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Light Microscopy (LM) were used for the study of morphology and the measurement of impact properties, to assess the embrittlement of the blend systems. In case of PP, surface cracks appeared spontaneously after 30 days of thermal aging. However, it has been observed that thermal stability of PP has significantly improved by blending it with mLLDPE even after 120 days of thermal aging. Similarly impact strength of PP has shown deterioration after 30 days while there is not much reduction in impact strength in case of PP/mLLDPE blends. The presence of stabilizer in both materials has not shown much difference in impact strength and morphology. Therefore the stabilizer ratio can be optimized vis-à-vis appropriate PP/mLLDPE blend composition. 相似文献
The crystalline structure and phase structure of metallocene linear low density polyethylene (mLLDPE) and low density polyethylene (LDPE) blends were investigated, using a combination of differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), wide-angle X-ray diffraction (WAXD), and small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) techniques. The samples displayed cocrystallization phenomenon for LDPE of 80 wt% in the blends, indicating good compatibility between the two components under this circumstance; as LDPE content decreased, phase separation arose whereas partial cocrystallization still existed in the blends. Over the whole range of weight fractions, the intrinsic crystal structure of mLLDPE does not change with the addition of LDPE, while enhanced orthorhombic crystalline phase were observed as LDPE content increased. The changes in the thickness of interface layer σb, dispersed phase size ac and integral invariant Q further indicate the existence of partial compatibility between the two phases. Irrespective of the phase inversion, the morphology of the dispersed phase is deduced to be in a transitional state from rod-like shape to flakes within the whole proportional range investigated. 相似文献
Blends of low density polyethylene (LDPE) and linear low density polyethylene (LLDPE) are widely used for blown film applications. An accurate and rapid test scheme to identify the type and composition of α-olefin in LDPE/LLDPE blends has been developed that utilizes differential scanning calorimetery (DSC) and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy techniques. The melting point of LDPE varies with density and usually is in the range of 106°C to 112°C for film grade resins. The DSC thermogram of LLDPE is characterized by a broad range of melting peaks with a lower melting peak around 106°C to 110°C and a higher one in the range of 120°C to 124°C. In a blend with LDPE, the ratio of the two endothermic peak heights changes. At a given weight percent of LDPE, this ratio depends on the type of LLDPE (i.e., the comonomer used). Separate calibrations for butene-1, hexene-1, and octene-1 LLDPEs have been developed to quantify the blend composition from DSC thermograms where the α-olefin type is successfully identified by FTIR over the entire blend composition range. The calibration curves are applicable to narrow melt index (MI) and density range conventional film grade LDPE and LLDPE resins and are not intended to be used for the metallocene type LLDPEs. 相似文献
Summary: The rheological behavior of polyethylenes is mainly dominated by the molecular weight, the molecular weight distribution and by the type, the amount and the distribution of the chain branches. In this work a linear metallocene catalyzed polyethylene (m‐PE), a branched metallocene catalyzed polyethylene (m‐bPE), a conventional linear low density polyethylene (LLDPE) and a low density polyethylene (LDPE) have been investigated in order to compare their rheological behavior in shear and in elongational flow. The four samples have similar melt flow index and in particular a value typical of film blowing grade. The melt viscosity has been studied both in shear and in isothermal and non‐isothermal elongational flow. The most important features of the results are that in shear flow the m‐PE sample shows less pronounced non Newtonian behavior while in the elongational flow the behavior of m‐PE is very similar to that of the linear low density polyethylene: the narrower molecular weight distribution and the better homogeneity of the branching distribution are reasonably responsible for this behavior. Of course the most pronounced non‐linear behavior is shown, as expected, by the LDPE sample and by the branched metallocene sample. This similar behavior has to be attributed to the presence of branching. Similar comments hold in non‐isothermal elongational flow; the LDPE sample shows the highest values of the melt strength and the other two samples show very similar values. As for the breaking stretching ratio the opposite is true for LDPE while m‐PE and LLDPE show higher values. The transient isothermal elongational viscosity curves show that the branched samples show a strain hardening effect, while LLDPE and m‐PE samples present a linear behavior.
Dimensionless flow curves of different polyethylene samples. 相似文献
The microstructure-property relationships in multicomponent ethylene-1-alkene copolymers with different branching in the microstructures are demonstrated. The metallocene catalyzed linear low density polyethylene (mLLDPE), was miscible with both autoclave grade low density polyethylene (LDPE-A) and/or tubular grade low density polyethylene (LDPE-T). For these multicomponent systems, the rheological response was distinctly differentiating and sensitive to the microstructure of LDPE, at higher shear regimes. The thicker lamellae of LDPE-T and/or LDPE-A might co-crystallize if there is a high density polyethylene-like fraction present in the mLLDPE. Even though the macro parameters like density and melt index (MI) of the investigated multicomponent systems are comparable, the subtle differences in the microstructure manifested by type and distribution of comonomer and/or branching affected the sealing performance. Both high comonomer content and comonomer distribution in the mLLDPE matrix affording a higher fraction of material melting below 120°C were found to be critical for the heat sealing. The fraction of material melting at lower temperatures, attributed to the tertiary branches present in the hyper-branched microstructure of LDPE-A, participate in the sealing process, and lower the sealing temperature. It was evident that mLLDPE with asymmetric distribution of lamellae is more sensitive to the microstructure of the LDPE used. 相似文献