基于调控保障性住房视角的住房建设规划研究

从住房建设规划入手,探讨规划的基本框架以及调控保障性住房建设采取的措施,分析其中存在的问题和原因,并给出相关改进建议,以充分发挥住房建设规划的作用,促进和谐社会的建设。     

广西召开住房保障规划编制工作座谈会

为做好2010--2012年保障性住房建设规划和“十二五”住房保障规划编制工作,7月4日下午,广西召开住房保障规划编制工作座谈会,对相关工作进行部署。     

关于保障性住房规划与建设的思考

为了全面提高保障性住房建设水平,要重视加强保障性住房规划研究水平.通过实践分析,本文结合保障性住房规划要素,总结了保障性住房规划与建设对策,希望实践分析能全面推进保障性住房规划工作开展,从而为社会稳定发展奠定良好基础.     

土地储备视角下的保障性住房规划机制

"住房问题"是保障民生、改善民生之要,进入新型城镇化的快速发展时期,在落实全面深化改革的新形势下,对继续完善城市保障性住房的建设规划提出了新的要求。研究从现阶段保障性住房建设规划的转型特点及存在问题出发,以建立城市保障性住房土地储备规划机制为切入点,同时结合对广州市保障性住房土地储备规划的解析,提出了基于土地储备视角的城市保障性住房建设规划建议。     

新形势下保障性住房建设规划编制方法探索——以南京市浦口区保障性住房建设规划为例

新形势下保障性住房建设规划表现出编制主体和实施主体合一、规划决策和规划实施相结合的特征。从保障性住房建设规划编制的四个难点出发,南京市浦口区保障性住房建设规划在需求预测、用地布局、适宜规模、规划设计标准、地块详细指标分析图则五个方面进行了规划编制办法的探索。     

打造住房保障之舟：加强保障性住房规划建设构建和谐社会的首善之区

住房、房价、安居…… 经适房、廉租房、两限房…… 从两会热议到街头巷议，有关房子的讨论成为民众翘首以盼的民生话题。     

青岛市：住房保障成绩斐然 再订规划机制创新

今年是青岛市第一个住房保障三年规划（2008-2010年）实施的最后一年。在实施好现规划的基础上,青岛市国土资源和房屋管理局会同有关部门抓紧研究制定新三年的住房保障规划,     

青岛：转交观念创新模式推进住房保障

今年以来,青岛市根据国务院的有关部署,以保障城市低收入家庭基本居住需求为重点,确立了"坚持三个原则、明确一个目标、落实三项措施"的保障性庄房建设思路,进一步强化了政府的公共服务职能、住房供应的社保功能和住房政策的公共效应,取得了初步成效.     

厦门市保障性住房政策与住房规划历程综述

通过阅读相关的文献资料,对厦门市20多年的保障性住房政策及建设情况进行了分析总结,并叙述了保障性住房规划历程,同时积累了相关经验,对城市规划和社会保障性住房的建设具有重要意义。     

保障性住房规划编制体系及建设管理机制

保障性住房建设是国家重要的民生工程,其建设对于改善全国居民住房条件取得了较好的成效,同时保障性住房规划存在的问题也逐步凸显。研究从城市规划的角度论述了保障性住房规划融入"总规—控规—修规"的城乡规划编制体系的策略,以期借助"规划"这一工具来强化保障性住房规划体系,减少保障性住房建设可能出现的问题,并对保障性住房的建设管理提出相关建议,以及完善保障性住房管理机制的措施。     

基于混合功能发展的保障性住宅用地规划研究

本文从城市用地混合功能发展的角度出发,分析研究了一类工业用地、文化设施用地、商业服务业设施用地、交通设施用地等适宜与保障性住宅混合发展的用地类型,针对城市老城区和新区中土地混合使用的不同特点,提出规划保障性住宅混合用地的不同策略,提高土地使用效率,实现低收入群体在城市中均匀分布的目标。     

浅谈保障性安居工程造价控制与管理

保障性安居工程建设是一项重大的民生工程,它是着力解决城镇困难家庭的住房问题,保障社会和谐稳定,促进经济发展的重大战略决策。我国从中央到地方,都高度重视保障性安居工程建设,大规模建设保障性安居工程,时间紧,任务重,如果工程造价不合理,必然影响住房工程质量安全,影响能否及时交付使用,影响保障对象在使用过程中是否满意,这就要求我们做好保障性安居工程造价的控制、管理工作。     

Planning and Affordable Housing in Australia and the UK: A Comparative Perspective

Land use planning systems in Australia and the United Kingdom (UK) share a common history. In both nations, one objective of town planning has been to improve housing conditions for the urban poor and facilitate sufficient housing supply for growing post-war populations, with UK legislation serving as a model for Australia, at least until the Town and Country Planning Act 1947. Since this time however, approaches have diverged. In the UK, housing assistance and the land use planning system have co-evolved, with planning an important tool for securing affordable housing, particularly in England. In contrast, a deep cleavage between urban planning and housing policy persists in Australia. Drawing on a series of studies undertaken separately by the authors over the past decade which concentrate on Australia and England, the paper compares urban and housing policy in both nations, and examines planning system performance in securing new affordable homes.     

The Planning System and the Provision of Affordable Housing in Rural Britain: A Comparison of the Scottish and English Experience

This paper compares recent experience in the use of the planning system to facilitate the provision of affordable housing in rural areas of Scotland and England. Following an introduction summarising key issues arising from the relevant literature, the paper first sets out the scale of need for rural affordable housing in the two countries and then summarises the differing planning policy frameworks. Scale of delivery is then addressed and an attempt is made to establish the extent to which differences in performance reflect variations in policy, delivery mechanisms or differing housing markets. The hypothesis is advanced that Scotland, although a more rural country, has made less use of planning policy to tackle issues relating to the need for rural social housing. In both countries scale of provision has lagged behind perceived need and a major reason for this would appear to be the tensions in planning policy between environmental and social sustainability objectives, with the scales so far weighted towards the environmental rather than the social imperative.     

Involving the Private Sector in Affordable Housing Provision: Can Australia Learn from the United Kingdom?

The focus of this article is to clarify the preconditions for the successful leverage of private investment to help both maintain and expand the affordable housing stock in Australia. To do this we examine a range of initiatives that have enabled such leverage in the UK and explore the lessons that can be drawn for Australia from this experience. The article provides an overview of UK experience since the 1980s and, from this, identifies the key factors that have both contributed to and constrained the expansion of affordable housing in the UK. It signals the key barriers and emerging challenges for the continued operation of this system of affordable housing provision in the UK and draws out the lessons, both positive and negative, that might help determine what is needed in Australia in order to fulfil the stated objective of the current Commonwealth State Housing Agreement—namely, to attract significant private investment into the provision of affordable housing. The concluding section addressing what might be done to increase the potential for leverage in the Australian situation, in the context of this policy goal.     

转型语境下深圳保障性住房建设观察与思考

深圳作为人口倒挂问题突出的城市,日益高昂的房价、巨大的住房缺口成为留住人才、促进产业升级、城市转型的重要制约。回顾深圳住房发展历程与特征,分析了目前深圳保障性住房建设过程中出现的需求结构矛盾鲜明、空间供给制约突出、分配机制有失弹性公平3方面的核心问题。基于以上问题,以社会公平为导向,对转型语境下的保障性住房如何建设进行了针对性探讨,进而指出深圳在转型期间保障性住房政策的创新集中体现在服务人群扩展、空间配置引导、管理机制完善3个方面。具体而言,通过鼓励以需定建,满足不同阶层的住房需求;拓宽住房供给,优化保障性住房空间分布;制定准入退出机制,维护保障性住房社会公平。     

英格兰保障性住房的发展及其对中国的启示

回顾二战以来英格兰保障性住房①的发展历史,总结了当前英格兰保障性住房的定位、类型、受益人群、供应机制以及空间绩效调控。结合英格兰的经验和我国的具体情况,从宏观、中观、微观三个层面对我国保障性住房发展提出启示:政府必须而且能够在保障性住房供给上发挥积极的作用;进一步完善、细化保障性住房的供应类型和监管机制;加强特大、大城市的保障性住房建设,注重空间绩效调控。     

The Factors Driving the Escalation of Community Opposition to Affordable Housing Development

Community opposition to locally unwanted development is not inherently problematic, but it can be destructive where conflict between proponents and objectors escalates. This paper relates mixed-methods findings from a Sydney case-study where opposition to planned affordable housing projects was widespread but uneven. Five factors are identified that escalated individual opposition campaigns in this case: public notification procedures; sense of injustice; prejudice; strong campaign leadership; and the involvement of politicians. We argue that these factors will likely also escalate opposition to the planned development of other forms of critical social infrastructure, and that an understanding of them can help minimise destructive conflicts between proponents and host communities.