Effect of styrene–isoprene–styrene,styrene–butadiene–styrene,and styrene–butadiene–rubber on the mechanical,thermal, rheological,and morphological properties of polypropylene/polystyrene blends

The mechanical, thermal, rheological, and morphological properties of polypropylene (PP)/polystyrene (PS) blends compatibilized with styrene–isoprene–styrene (SIS), styrene–butadiene–styrene (SBS), and styrene–butadiene–rubber (SBR) were studied. The incompatible PP and PS phases were effectively dispersed by the addition of SIS, SBS, and SBR as compatibilizers. The PP/PS blends were mechanically evaluated in terms of the impact strength, ductility, and tensile yield stress to determine the influence of the compatibilizers on the performance properties of these materials. SIS‐ and SBS‐compatibilized blends showed significantly improved impact strength and ductility in comparison with SBR‐compatibilized blends over the entire range of compatibilizer concentrations. Differential scanning calorimetry indicated compatibility between the components upon the addition of SIS, SBS, and SBR by the appearance of shifts in the melt peak of PP toward the melting range of PS. The melt viscosity and storage modulus of the blends depended on the composition, type, and amount of compatibilizer. Scanning electron microscopy images confirmed the compatibility between the PP and PS components in the presence of SIS, SBS, and SBR by showing finer phase domains. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 88: 266–277, 2003     

Studies on dynamically vulcanized polypropylene (PP)/butadiene styrene block copolymer (SBS) blends: Crystallization and thermal behavior

Crystallization of polypropylene (PP) in unvulcanized blends of PP with the butadiene–styrene block copolymer (SBS) was studied through differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and X‐ray diffraction measurements in the composition range of 0–40 wt % SBS content. Analysis of the crystallization exotherms revealed variation in the crystallization behavior, crystallinity, and crystalline morphology of the PP component in the blends at various levels of SBS concentration. The crystallinity determined by X‐ray diffraction and DSC showed identical variations with the blend composition. The tensile and thermal properties of the blends were studied in the entire composition range. Correlations of the tensile properties with the crystallization parameters of the PP component in the blends are also presented. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 71: 151–161, 1999     

Application of phase dispersion–crosslinking synergism on recycling commingled plastic wastes

A tetra‐component blend, consisting of low‐density polyethylene (LDPE), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), polypropylene (PP), and polystyrene (PS), was studied as a model system of commingled plastic wastes (LDPE/PVC/PP/PS, mass ratio: 70/10/10/10). Effects of chlorinated polyethylene (CPE), ethylene–propylene–diene monomer (EPDM), styrene–butadiene–styrene (SBS), and their mixture (CPE/EPDM/SBS, mass ratio: 2/2/2) on the mechanical properties and morphology of the system were investigated. With addition of several elastomers and their mixture, the tensile strength of the blends decreased slightly, although both the elongation at break and the impact strength increased. Among these elastomers, EPDM exhibited the most significant impact modification effect for the tetra‐component blends. SBS and the mixture have a good phase‐dispersion effect for the tetra‐component blend. By adding a crosslinking agent [dicumyl peroxide (DCP)], the mechanical properties of the tetra‐component blends also increased. When either SBS or the mixture was added to the blend together with DCP, the probability that the crosslinking agent (DCP) would be at the interface improved because of the phase‐dispersion effect of SBS. Therefore, more co‐crosslinked products will form between LDPE and other components. Accordingly, remarkable improvement of the interfacial adhesion and hence the mechanical properties of the tetra‐component blends occurred. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 82: 2947–2952, 2001     

A novel combination of sandwich and co‐continuous structure based on polypropylene and styrene‐butadiene‐styrene block copolymer formed with wide range of polypropylene content

The styrene–butadiene–styrene block copolymer (SBS)/polypropylene (PP) blends with a unique sandwich layered co‐continuous structure were prepared by melt compounding. Differing from single conventional co‐continuous and sandwich structure, this structure was formed, where pure PP and co‐continuous SBS/PP phase acting as the face sheets and core. Even though the volume content was 20 or 10 vol %, PP always amazingly formed a continuous phase in SBS/PP blends, whereas the morphology of SBS phase relatively changed from dispersed particles to continuous network as its content increased to 50 vol %. For immiscible SBS/PP blends, due to the huge difference of complex viscosity and surface tension between SBS and PP, a pure PP layer existed on the surface of blends which can be ascribed to the PP enrichment. Herein, the structure of blends with more than 50 vol % SBS was presented as sandwich layered co‐continuous structure by combining the pure PP layer and co‐continuous structure. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2018 , 135, 46580.     

Blends of i‐PP and SBS. II. Influence of in situ compatibilization on the mechanical properties

This article concerns the in situ compatibilization of immiscible isotatic polypropylene/styrene–butadiene–styrene triblock copolymer blends (i‐PP/SBS) by use of a reactive mixture. For this purpose, maleated PP (PP–MAH) and SBS (SBS–MAH) were used as functionalized polymers and 4,4′‐diaminediphenylmethane was used as a coupling agent between maleated polymers, resulting in a graft copolymer. Binary blends of i‐PP/SBS, nonreactive ternary blends of i‐PP/PP–MAH/SBS, and reactive ternary blends of i‐PP/PP–MAH/SBS–MAH with varying diamine/anhydride molar ratios were prepared. The mechanical properties of the blends were determined by tensile and impact‐resistance tests. The optimum improvement in the mechanical properties was found when the diamine/anhydride molar ratio in the ternary reactive blends was 0.5/1. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 87: 516–522, 2003     

Fabrication of polypropylene blends with excellent low‐temperature toughness and balanced toughness‐rigidity by a combination of EPR and SEEPS

To overcome serious rigidity depression of rubber‐toughened plastics and fabricate a rigidity‐toughness balanced thermoplastic, a combination of styrene‐[ethylene‐(ethylene‐propylene)]‐styrene block copolymer (SEEPS) and ethylene‐propylene rubber (EPR) was used to toughen polypropylene. The dynamic mechanical properties, crystallization and melting behavior, and mechanical properties of polypropylene (PP)/EPR/SEEPS blends were studied in detail. The results show that the combination of SEEPS and EPR can achieve the tremendous improvement of low‐temperature toughness without significant strength and rigidity loss. Dynamic mechanical properties and phase morphology results demonstrate that there is a good interfacial strength and increased loss of compound rubber phase comprised of EPR component and EP domain of SEEPS. Compared with PP/EPR binary blends, although neither glass transition temperature (T_g) of the rubber phase nor T_g of PP matrix in PP/EPR/SEEPS blends decreases, the brittle‐tough transition temperature (T_bd) of PP/EPR/SEEPS blends decreases, indicating that the increased interfacial interaction between PP matrix and compound rubber phase is also an effective approach to decrease T_bd of the blends so as to improve low‐temperature toughness. The balance between rigidity and toughness of PP/EPR/SEEPS blends is ascribed to the synergistic effect of EPR and SEEPS on toughening PP. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2018 , 135, 45714.     

Compatibilization efficiency of styrene–butadiene triblock copolymers in polystyrene–polypropylene blends with varying compositions

The compatibilization efficiency of two styrene‐butadiene‐styrene triblock copolymers with short (SB1) and long (SB2) styrene blocks was studied in polystyrene (PS)–polypropylene (PP) blends of composition 20, 50, and 80 wt % PS. The supramolecular structure of the blends was determined by small‐angle X‐ray scattering, and the morphology was studied with transmission electron microscopy and scanning electron microscopy. Structural changes in both the uncompatibilized and compatibilized blends were correlated with the values of tensile impact strength of these blends. Even though the compatibilization mechanisms were different in blends with SB1 and SB2, the addition of the block copolymers to the PS–PP 4/1 and PS–PP 1/4 blends led to similar structures and improved the mechanical properties in the same way. These block copolymers had a very slight effect on the impact strength in PS–PP 1/1 blends, exhibiting a nearly cocontinuous phase morphology. The strong migration of SB2 copolymers to the interface and of SB1 copolymers away from the interface were detected during the annealing of compatibilized PS–PP 4/1 blends. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 92: 2431–2441, 2004     

SBS and SEBS block copolymers as impact modifiers for polypropylene compounds

Blends of polypropylene (PP) and thermoplastic elastomers (TPE), namely SBS (styrene‐butadiene‐styrene) and SEBS (styrene‐ethylene/1‐butene‐styrene) block copolymers, were prepared to evaluate the effectiveness of the TPE type as an impact modifier for PP and influence of the concentration of elastomer on the polymer properties. Polypropylene homopolymer (PP‐H) and ethylene–propylene random copolymer (PP‐R) were evaluated as the PP matrix. Results showed that TPEs had a nucleating effect that caused the PP crystallization temperature to increase, with SBS being more effective than SEBS. Microstructure characterization tests showed that in most cases PP/SEBS blends showed the smallest rubber droplets regardless of the matrix used. It was seen that SEBS is a more effective toughening agent for PP than SBS. At 0°C the Izod impact strength of the PP‐H/SEBS 30% b/w blend was twofold higher than the SBS strength, with the PP‐R/SEBS 30% b/w blend showing no break. A similar behavior on tensile properties and flexural modulus were observed in both PP/TPE blends. Yield stress and tensile strength decreased and elongation at break increased by expanding the dispersed elastomeric phase in the PP matrix. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 95: 254–263, 2005     

Photodegradation of thermodegraded polypropylene/high‐impact polystyrene blends: Mechanical properties

The influence of the addition of high‐impact polystyrene (HIPS) on polypropylene (PP) photodegradation was studied with blends obtained by extrusion with and without styrene–butadiene–styrene (SBS) copolymer (10 wt % with respect to the dispersed phase). The concentrations of HIPS ranged from 10 to 30 wt %. The blends and pure materials were exposed for periods of up to 15 weeks of UV irradiation; their mechanical properties (tensile and impact), fracture surface, and melt flow indices were monitored. After 3 weeks of UV exposure, all of the materials presented mechanical properties of the same order of magnitude. However, for times of exposure greater than 3 weeks, an increasing concentration of HIPS resulted in a better photostability of PP. These results were explained in light of morphological observations. This increase of photostability was even greater when SBS was added to the blends. It was more difficult to measure the melt flow index of the binary PP/HIPS blends than that of PP for low concentrations of HIPS; this was most likely due to energy transfer between the blend domains during photodegradation. This phenomenon was not observed for the ternary blends. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011     

Phase interactions and structure evolution of heterophasic ethylene–propylene copolymers as a function of system composition

Heterophasic copolymers comprised of polypropylene (PP) matrix and ethylene–propylene copolymer (EPC) dispersed phase were investigated with respect to the dispersed phase composition, i.e., ethylene/propylene ratio. The rheological properties, morphology, as well as thermal and mechanical relaxation behavior were studied to describe the structure evolution and phase interactions between the components of the PP copolymers. Decrease of the ethylene content of the EPC leads to a higher matrix‐dispersed phase compatibility, as evaluated by the shift of the glass transition temperatures of EPC and PP towards each other. At ethylene content of EPC of 17 wt %, the glass transition temperatures of the both phases merged into a joint relaxation. The effect of the EPC composition on the internal structure of the dispersed domains and on the morphology development of the heterophasic copolymers was demonstrated. Decreasing ethylene content was found to induce a refinement of the dispersed phase with several orders of magnitude down to 0.18 μm for propylene‐rich EPC. Optical microscopy observations showed that the dispersed propylene‐rich phase is preferably rejected at the interlamellar regions of the spherulites and/or at the interspherulitic regions, while the ethylene‐rich domains are engulfed within the PP spherulites. Both of these processes impose an additional energetic barrier and influence the spherulite growth rate of the heterophasic materials. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 101: 2825–2837, 2006     

Effects of SBS on phase morphology of iPP/aPS blends

The supermolecular structure of binary isotactic polypropylene/poly(styrene‐b‐butadiene‐h‐styrene) (iPP/SBS) and isotactic polypropylene/atactic polystyrene (iPP/aPS) compression molded blends and that of ternary iPP/aPS/SBS blends were studied by optical microscopy, scanning and transmission electron microscopy, wide‐angle X‐ray diffraction and differential scanning calorimetry. Nucleation, crystal growth, solidification and blend phase morphology are affected by the addition of amorphous components (SBS and aPS). As a compatiblizer in immiscible iPP/aPS blends, SBS formed interfacial layer between dispersed honeycomb‐like aPS/SBS particles and the iPP matrix, thus influencing the crystallization process in iPP. The amount of SBS and aPS, and compatibilizing efficiency of SBS, determine the size of dispersed aPS, SBS, and aPS/SBS particles and, consequently, the final blend phase morphologies: well‐developed spherulitic morphology, cross‐hatched structure with blocks of sandwich lamellae and co‐continuous morphology. The analysis of the relationship between the size of spherulites and dispersed particles gave the criterion relation, which showed that, in the case of a well‐developed spherulitization, the spherulites should be about fourteen times larger than the incorporated dispersed particles; i.e. to be large enough to engulf dispersed inclusions without considerable disturbing of the spherulitic structure.     

Influence of calcium carbonate filler and mixing type process on structure and properties of styrene–acrylonitrile/ethylene–propylene–diene polymer blends

The properties of styrene–acrylonitrile (SAN) and ethylene–propylene–diene (EPDM) blends containing different types of calcium carbonate filler were studied. The influence of mixing type process on the blend properties was also studied. Two different mixing processes were used. The first one includes mixing of all components together. The other process is a two‐step mixing procedure: masterbatch (MB; EPDM/SAN/filler blend) was prepared and then it was mixed with previously prepared polymer blend. Surface energy of samples was determined to predict the strength of interactions between polymer blend components and used fillers. The phase morphology of blends and their thermal and mechanical properties were studied. From the results, it can be concluded that the type of mixing process has a strong influence on the morphological, thermal, and mechanical properties of blends. The two‐step mixing process causes better dispersion of fillers in blends as well as better dispersion of EPDM in SAN matrix, and therefore, the finest morphology and improved properties are observed in blends with MB. It can be concluded that the type of mixing process and carefully chosen compatibilizer are the important factors for obtaining the improved compatibility of SAN/EPDM blends. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2012     

Blends of i‐PP and SBS. I. Influence of the in situ compatibilization on the morphology

This article concerns the in situ compatibilization of immiscible isotactic polypropylene/butadiene‐styrene‐butadiene triblock copolymer blends (i‐PP/SBS) by means of a reactive mixture. For this purpose, maleated PP (PP‐MAH) and SBS (SBS‐MAH) were used as functionalized polymers and 4,4′‐diaminediphenylmethane was used as a coupling agent between maleated polymers, resulting in a graft copolymer. Binary blends i‐PP/SBS, nonreactive ternary blends i‐PP/PP‐MAH/SBS, and reactive ternary blends i‐PP/PP‐MAH/SBS‐MAH with varying diamine and anhydride molar ratios were prepared. Torque measurements suggest a graft copolymerization during the melt blending for ternary reactive blends, but the extension of the grafting does not vary with the diamine and anhydride molar ratio, but with the elastomer concentration. The morphology of the blends was investigated by scanning electron microscopy. The morphology of binary and ternary nonreactive blends is similar, exhibiting elastomer domains disperse in the i‐PP matrix, whose sizes increase with elastomer concentration. On the other hand, the elastomer domain size in the ternary reactive blends is practically independent of the blends composition and of the diamine and anhydride molar ratio. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 85: 847–855, 2002     

Studies on the dynamically vulcanized polypropylene (PP)/butadiene styrene block copolymer (SBS) blends: Mechanical properties

Unvulcanized and dynamically vulcanized blends of isotactic polypropylene (PP) and butadiene styrene block copolymer (SBS) in the composition range of 10–40 wt % SBS were prepared by melt mixing in an internal mixer and evaluated for impact and tensile properties. Dynamic vulcanization of blends gave superior mechanical properties. Systematic changes with varying blend composition were found in stress-strain behavior in both the blend systems. The effect of blend composition on the state of dispersion and morphology of the dispersed phase droplets were studied by scanning electron microscopy. Analysis of the yield stress data in terms of various theoretical models revealed the variation of stress concentration effect with blend composition and higher interphase adhesion in dynamically vulcanized blends. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 65: 2691–2701, 1997     

Mechanical properties and morphology of polyethylene–polypropylene blends with controlled thermal history

The effect of time–temperature treatment on the mechanical properties and morphology of polyethylene–polypropylene (PE–PP) blends was studied to establish a relationship among the thermal treatment, morphology, and mechanical properties. The experimental techniques used were polarized optical microscopy with hot‐stage, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and tensile testing. A PP homopolymer was used to blend with various PEs, including high‐density polyethylene (HDPE), low‐density polyethylene (LDPE), linear low‐density polyethylene (LLDPE), and very low density polyethylene (VLDPE). All the blends were made at a ratio of PE:PP = 80:20. Thermal treatment was carried out at temperatures between the crystallization temperatures of PP and PEs to allow PP to crystallize first from the blends. A very diffuse PP spherulite morphology in the PE matrix was formed in partially miscible blends of LLDPE–PP even though PP was present at only 20% by mass. Droplet‐matrix structures were developed in other blends with PP as dispersed domains in a continuous PE matrix. The SEM images displayed a fibrillar structure of PP spherulite in the LLDPE–PP blends and large droplets of PP in the HDPE–PP blend. The DSC results showed that the crystallinity of PP was increased in thermally treated samples. This special time–temperature treatment improved tensile properties for all PE–PP blends by improving the adhesion between PP and PE and increasing the overall crystallinity. In particular, in the LLDPE–PP blends, tensile properties were improved enormously because of a greater increase in the interfacial adhesion induced by the diffuse spherulite and fibrillar structure. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 76: 1151–1164, 2000     

Compatibilization of styrene–butadiene–styrene block copolymer in polypropylene/polystyrene blends by analysis of phase morphology

Effect of compatibilization of styrene–butadiene–styrene (SBS) block copolymer in polypropylene/polystyrene (PP/PS) blends was studied by means of small angle X‐ray scattering (SAXS) and scanning electron microscope (SEM). According to SAXS, a certain amount of SBS was located at the interface in all the analyzed samples, forming the relatively thicker interface layer penetrating into homopolymers, and the thickness of the interface layer was quantified in terms of Porod light scattering theory. The incorporation of SBS into PP/PS blends resulted in a decrease in domain size following an emulsification curve as well as an uniform size distribution, and consequently, a fine dispersion of PP domains in the PS matrix. This effect was more pronounced when the concentration of SBS was higher. A critical concentration of SBS of 15% above which the interface layer approaches to saturation and domain size attains a steady‐state was observed. Further, the morphology fluctuation of unetched fracture surface of umcompatibilized and compatibilized blends was analyzed using an integral constant Q based on Debye‐Bueche light scattering theories. Variation of Q as a function of the concentration of SBS showed that, due to the penetrating interface layer, adhesion between phases was improved, making it possible for applied stress to transfer between phases and leading to more uniform stress distribution when blends were broken; accordingly, a more complicated morphology fluctuation of fracture surface appeared. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 103:365–370, 2007     

Characterization of polypropylene–poly(1-butene)–hydrogenated olygo(cyclopentadiene) ternary blends

Ternary blends containing polypropylene (PP), poly(1-butene) (PB), and hydrogenated oligo(cyclopentadiene) (HOCP) have been studied using microscopic calorimetric and dynamic mechanical techniques, with no phase separation having been observed in the melt for all the considered compositions. The morphology of the crystallized blends and spherulite growth rate of the PP component appeared to be influenced by the blend composition. The presence of one or two T_gs revealed by dynamic mechanical thermal analysis (DMTA) on quenched or crystallized blends has suggested that demixing phenomena can occur during the crystallization of the components. The blend composition has been found to affect the overall crystallization rate and the equilibrium melting temperature of the PP component. A parameter describing the enthalpic interactions between the PP component and the diluent fraction evidenced that the addition of HOCP to PP and PB increases the stability of the ternary blend. The above results suggest that the three components can form a miscible blend in the melt. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 65:1659–1665, 1997     

Novel method for preparation of quaternary ammonium ionomer from epoxidized styrene–butadiene–styrene triblock copolymer and its use as compatibilizer for blending of styrene–butadiene–styrene and chlorosulfonated polyethylene

A novel method for the preparation of a quaternary ammonium ionomer of styrene–butadiene–styrene triblock copolymer (SBS) was developed by a ring‐opening reaction of epoxidized SBS with triethylamine hydrochloride in the presence of a phase transfer catalyst. The optimum conditions were studied. The ionomer was characterized by quantitative analysis, IR spectroscopy, and ¹H‐NMR spectroscopy. Its water absorbency, oil absorbency, dilute solution viscosity, and use as a compatibilizer for the blending of SBS and chlorosulfonated polyethylene (CSPE) were investigated. The results showed that, under optimum conditions, the epoxy groups can be completely converted to the quaternary ammonium groups. The IR spectrum did not exhibit the absorption peak for quaternary ammonium groups, whereas the ¹H‐NMR spectrum and titration method demonstrated it. With increasing ionic group content, the water absorbency of the ionomer increased whereas its oil absorbency decreased. These indicated the amphiphilic character of the SBS ionomer. The dilute solution viscosity of the ionomer in toluene/methanol (9/1) solvent increased with increasing quaternary ammonium group content. The ionomer was used as a compatibilizer for the blends of SBS and CSPE. The addition of a small amount of the ionomer to the blend enhanced the mechanical properties of the blends: 2 wt % ionomer based on the blend increased the tensile strength and ultimate elongation of the blend nearly 2 times. The blends of equal parts SBS and CSPE behaved as oil‐resistant thermoplastic elastomers. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 99: 1975–1980, 2006     

Ternary polymer blends of polyamide 6, polypropylene,and acrylonitrile‐butadiene‐styrene: Influence of multiwalled carbon nanotubes on phase morphology,electrical conductivity,and crystallization

Ternary polymer blends of 80/10/10 (wt/wt/wt) polyamide6 (PA6)/polypropylene (PP)/acrylonitrile‐butadiene‐styrene (ABS), PP/PA6/ABS, and ABS/PP/PA6 were prepared in the presence of multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) by melt‐mixing technique to investigate the influence of MWCNTs on the phase morphology, electrical conductivity, and the crystallization behavior of the PP and PA6 phases in the respective blends. Morphological analysis showed the “core–shell”‐type morphology in 80/10/10 PA6/PP/ABS and 80/10/10 PP/PA6/ABS blends, which was found to be unaltered in the presence of MWCNTs. However, MWCNTs exhibited “compatibilization‐like” action, which was manifested in a reduction of average droplet size of the dispersed phase/s. In contrast, a separately dispersed morphology has been found in the case of 80/10/10 ABS/PP/PA6 blends in which both the phases (PP and PA6) were dispersed separately in the ABS matrix. The electrical percolation threshold for 80/10/10 PA6/PP/ABS and 80/10/10 PP/PA6/ABS ternary polymer blends was found between 3–4 and 2–3 wt% of MWCNTs, respectively, whereas 80/10/10 ABS/PP/PA6 blends showed electrically insulating behavior even at 5 wt% of MWCNTs. Nonisothermal crystallization studies could detect the presence of MWCNTs in the PA6 and the PP phases. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2011. © 2011 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Mechanical properties and morphology of PP/ABS blends compatibilized with PP‐g‐2‐HEMA

Polypropylene (PP) and acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene blends of different composition were prepared using a single‐screw extruder. The binary blend of PP/ABS was observed to be incompatible and shows poor mechanical properties. PP‐g‐2‐hydroxyethyl methacrylate (2‐HEMA) was used as a compatibilizer for the PP/ABS blends. The ternary compatibilized blends of PP/ABS/PP‐g‐2‐HEMA showed improvement in the mechanical properties. Electron micrographs of these blends showed a homogeneous and finer distribution of the dispersed phase. The mechanical performance increased particularly in the PP‐rich blend. The 2.5‐phr (part per hundred of resin) compatibilizer was observed to bring improvement to the properties. The suitability of various existing theoretical models for the predication of the tensile moduli of these blends was examined. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 88: 72–78, 2003