Phase structure and properties of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/high‐density polyethylene based on recycled materials

Blends based on recycled high density polyethylene (R‐HDPE) and recycled poly(ethylene terephthalate) (R‐PET) were made through reactive extrusion. The effects of maleated polyethylene (PE‐g‐MA), triblock copolymer of styrene and ethylene/butylene (SEBS), and 4,4′‐methylenedi(phenyl isocyanate) (MDI) on blend properties were studied. The 2% PE‐g‐MA improved the compatibility of R‐HDPE and R‐PET in all blends toughened by SEBS. For the R‐HDPE/R‐PET (70/30 w/w) blend toughened by SEBS, the dispersed PET domain size was significantly reduced with use of 2% PE‐g‐MA, and the impact strength of the resultant blend doubled. For blends with R‐PET matrix, all strengths were improved by adding MDI through extending the PET molecular chains. The crystalline behaviors of R‐HDPE and R‐PET in one‐phase rich systems influenced each other. The addition of PE‐g‐MA and SEBS consistently reduced the crystalline level (χ_c) of either the R‐PET or the R‐HDPE phase and lowered the crystallization peak temperature (T_c) of R‐PET. Further addition of MDI did not influence R‐HDPE crystallization behavior but lowered the χ_c of R‐PET in R‐PET rich blends. The thermal stability of R‐HDPE/R‐PET 70/30 and 50/50 (w/w) blends were improved by chain‐extension when 0.5% MDI was added. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2009     

A Preliminary Investigation on the Use of Poly[(ethylene terephthalate)‐co‐(ε‐caprolactone)] Copolymer as Compatibiliser of HDPE/PET Blends

A preliminary study on the possibility to use the copolymer poly[(ethylene terephthalate)‐co‐(ε‐caprolactone)] as a compatibilising agent in blends of high density polyethylene (HDPE) and poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) is reported. The copolymer was synthesised by polycondensation of low‐molecular weight PCL precursors, previously end‐capped with reactive isocyanate groups, and oligomers of PET obtained from PET waste through a controlled depolymerisation procedure. HDPE/PET blends at a composition of 70/30 w/w with and without the addition of 10 wt.‐% of compatibiliser were prepared in a single‐screw mixer extruder. The effect of compatibiliser was evaluated by studying the thermal, dynamic‐mechanical and mechanical properties and the morphology of the blends. The compatibiliser was found to be a good emulsifying agent from a morphological point of view. Nevertheless, the mechanical properties of the blend were not improved by the addition of the compatibiliser.     

Influence of high density polyethylene‐g‐maleic anhydride on compatibility and properties of poly(butylene terephthalate)/high density polyethylene blends

Poly(butylene terephthalate)/high density polyethylene (PBT/HDPE) blends and PBT/HDPE‐grafted maleic anhydride (PBT/HDPE‐g‐MAH) blends were prepared by the reactive extrusion approach, and the effect of blend compositions on the morphologies and properties of PBT/HDPE blends and PBT/HDPE‐g‐MAH blends was studied in detail. The results showed that flexural strength, tensile strength, and notched impact strength of PBT/HDPE blends decreased with the addition of HDPE, and flexural strength and tensile strength of PBT/HDPE‐g‐MAH blends decreased, while the notched impact strength of PBT/HDPE‐g‐MAH increased with the addition of HDPE‐g‐MAH. Compared with PBT/HDPE blends, the dimension of the dispersed phase particles in PBT/HDPE‐g‐MAH blends was decreased and the interfacial adhesion was increased. On the other hand, the effects of HDPE and HDPE‐g‐MAH contents on the crystalline and the rheological properties of the blends were also investigated. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 102: 6081–6087, 2006     

Toughened polyoxymethylene by polyolefin elastomer and glycidyl methacrylate grafted high‐density polyethylene

Ternary blends of polyoxymethylene (POM), polyolefin elastomer (POE), and glycidyl methacrylate grafted high density polyethylene (GMA‐g‐HDPE) with various component ratios were studied for their mechanical and thermal properties. The size of POE dispersed phase increased with increasing the elastomer content due to the observed agglomeration. The notched impact strength demonstrated a parabolic tendency with increasing the elastomer content and reached the peak value of 10.81 kJ/m² when the elastomer addition was 7.5 wt%. The disappearance of epoxy functional groups in the POM/POE/GMA‐g‐HDPE blends indicated that GMA‐g‐HDPE reacted with the terminal hydroxyl groups of POM and formed a new graft copolymer. Higher thermal stability was observed in the modified POM. Both storage modulus and loss modulus decreased from dynamic mechanical analysis tests while the loss factor increased with increasing the elastomer content. GMA‐g‐HDPE showed good compatibility between the POM matrix and the POE dispersed phase due to the reactive compatibilization of the epoxy groups of GMA and the terminal hydroxyl groups of POM. A POM/POE blend without compatibilizer was researched for comparison, it was found that the properties of P‐7.5(POM/POE 92.5 wt%/7.5 wt%) were worse than those of the blend with the GMA‐g‐HDPE compatibilizer. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 57:1119–1126, 2017. © 2017 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Thermostimulative shape‐memory effect of reactive compatibilized high‐density polyethylene/poly(ethylene terephthalate) blends by an ethylene–butyl acrylate–glycidyl methacrylate terpolymer

High‐density polyethylene (HDPE)/poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) blends were prepared by means of melt extrusion with ethylene–butyl acrylate–glycidyl methacrylate terpolymer (EBAGMA) as a reactive compatibilizer. The effects of the EBAGMA and PET contents, recovery temperature, and stretch ratio on the thermostimulative shape‐memory behavior of the blends were studied. The results show that the addition of EBAGMA to the HDPE/PET blends obviously improved the compatibility and the shape‐memory effects of the blends. The response temperature was determined by the melting point of HDPE, and the shape‐recovery ratio of the 90/10/5 HDPE/PET/EBAGMA blend reached nearly 100%. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2009     

Poly(ethylene terephthalate)/polypropylene reactive blends through isocyanate functional group

To evaluate the compatibilization effects of an isocyanate group on poly(ethylene terephthalate)/polypropylene (PET/PP) blends through a reactive blend, PP grafted with 2‐hydroxyethyl methacrylate‐isophorone diisocyanate (PP‐g‐HI) was prepared and blended with PET. In view of the blend morphology, the presence of PP‐g‐HI reduced the particle size of the dispersed phase by the reduced interfacial tension between the PP and PET phases, indicating the in situ copolymer (PP‐g‐PET) generated during the melt blending. The DSC thermograms for the cooling run indicated that the PET crystallization in the PP‐g‐HI rich phase was affected by the chemical reactions of PET and PP‐g‐HI. The improved mechanical properties for the PET/PP‐g‐HI blends were shown in the measurement of the tensile and flexural properties. In addition, the water absorption test indicated that the PET/PP‐g‐HI blend was more effective than the PET/PP blend in improving the water resistance of PET. The positive properties of PET/PP‐g‐HI blends stemmed from the improved compatibilization of the PET/PP blend. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 81: 1056–1062, 2001     

Improved compatibility of PET/HDPE blend by using GMA grafted thermoplastic elastomer

ABSTRACT

Herein, graft-modified ethylene-1-octene copolymer (POE-g-GMA) and styrene-butadiene-styrene triblock copolymer (SBS-g-GMA) were found to be excellent reactive compatibilizers for immiscible poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET)/high-density polyethylene (HDPE) blends via in-situ reaction compatibilization. With increase in compatibilizer amount, uniform phase morphology was observed in all the blends. Thus, exhibiting enhanced mechanical properties, especially, the notched Izod impact strength. In comparison with SBS-g-GMA, compatibilizer POE-g-GMA demonstrated greater impact on the compatibility. The addition of 15% POE-g-GMA produced blends with best mechanical properties. Besides, both POE-g-GMA and SBS-g-GMA enhanced the melt viscosity of PET/HDPE blends.     

In situ compatibilization of HDPE/PET blends

The reactive compatibilization of immiscible polymers such as high‐density polyethylene (HDPE) and poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) by interfacial grafting of maleic anhydride (MA) without initiator in the molten state was investigated in this study. Grafting reaction of MA onto HDPE was carried out in a Rheocord HAAKE mixer varying reaction parameters such as the temperature, the shear rate, and the time of reaction. Then, the purified copolymers were characterized by infrared spectrometry and the MA content of HDPE‐g‐MA copolymers was determined by volumetric titration. It has been shown that thermomechanical initiation is sufficient to reach grafting yield of 0.3 to 2.5 wt % of MA. We studied then the compatibilization of HDPE/PET blends by interfacial grafting of MA. The in situ interfacial reaction leads to the formation of HDPE‐g‐MA copolymer which acts as a compatibilizer in the blends. The foremost interest of this work is that it provides a simple way of compatibilization of immiscible blends of polyolefin and polyester in one transformation step without using free‐radical initiators. The mechanical properties of the blends are strongly improved by the addition of small quantities of MA. The SEM observations of the compatibilized blends show a deep modification of the structure (i.e., enhanced regularity in the nodule dispersion and better interfacial adhesion). © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 79: 874–880, 2001     

Morphology,thermal behavior,and mechanical properties of PA6/UHMWPE blends with HDPE‐g‐MAH as a compatibilizing agent

A functionalized high‐density polyethylene (HDPE) with maleic anhydride (MAH) was prepared using a reactive extruding method. This copolymer was used as a compatibilizer of blends of polyamide 6 (PA6) and ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE). Morphologies were examined by a scanning electron microscope. It was found that the dimension of UHMWPE and HDPE domains in the PA6 matrix decreased dramatically, compared with that of the uncompatibilized blending system. The size of the UHMWPE domains was reduced from 35 μm (PA6/UHMWPE, 80/20) to less than 4 μm (PA6/UHMWPE/HDPE‐g‐MAH, 80/20/20). The tensile strength and Izod impact strength of PA6/UHMWPE/HDPE‐g‐MAH (80/20/20) were 1.5 and 1.6 times as high as those of PA6/UHMWPE (80/20), respectively. This behavior could be attributed to chemical reactions between the anhydride groups of HDPE‐g‐MAH and the terminal amino groups of PA6 in PA6/UHMWPE/HDPE‐g‐MAH blends. Thermal analysis was performed to confirm that the above chemical reactions took place during the blending process. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 75: 232–238, 2000     

Mechanical properties and morphology of the modified HDPE/starch reactive blend

We investigated the effect of reactive blending on the mechanical properties and morphology of high‐density polyethylene (HDPE)/plasticized starch blends. HDPE was chemically modified to enhance the compatibility with the plasticized starch. The modified HDPE, HDPE‐g‐glycidyl methacrylate (GMA), was synthesized by melt reaction of HDPE in the presence of dicumyl peroxide (DCP). A finer dispersion of starch in the HDPE matrix was achieved compared to that in the unmodified HDPE. The amount of GMA groups in the modified HDPE enhanced the miscibility of HDPE/starch blends. We also observed that the amount of glycerin improves the mechanical properties of blends. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 82: 3313–3320, 2001     

Effect of EPDM‐g‐MAH on the morphology and properties of PA6/EPDM/HDPE ternary blends

The formation of core‐shell morphology within the dispersed phase was studied for composite droplet polymer‐blend systems comprising a polyamide‐6 matrix, ethylene‐propylene‐diene terpolymer (EPDM) shell and high density polyethylene (HDPE) core. In this article, the effect of EPDM with different molecular weights on the morphology and properties of the blends were studied. To improve the compatibility of the ternary blends, EPDM was modified by grafting with maleic anhydride (EPDM‐g‐MAH). It was found that core‐shell morphology with EPDM‐g‐MAH as shell and HDPE as core and separated dispersion morphology of EPDM‐g‐MAH and HDPE phase were obtained separately in PA6 matrix with different molecular weights of EPDM‐g‐MAH in the blends. DSC measurement indicated that there may be some co‐crystals in the blends due to the formation of core‐shell structure. Mechanical tests showed that PA6/EPDM‐g‐MAH/HDPE ternary blends with the core‐shell morphology exhibited a remarkable rise in the elongation at break. With more perfect core‐shell composite droplets and co‐crystals, the impact strength of the ternary blends could be greatly increased to 51.38 kJ m^?2, almost 10 times higher than that of pure PA6 (5.50 kJ m^?2). POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2013. © 2012 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer/high density polyethylene blends compatibilized through functionalization

In order to evaluate the compatibilizing effects of isocyanate (NCO) functional groups on ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer/high density polyethylene (EVOH/HDPE) blends, HDPE grafted with 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate-isophorone diisocyanate (HDEP-g-HI) was prepared and blended with EVOH. The grafting was confirmed by infrared spectra, and the grafting ratio was 4.9% from elementary analysis. From the morphologies of EVOH/HDPE-g-HI blends, it was found that an improved adhesion between the two components and finer dispersions were produced as a result of chemical reactions occurring during the melt blending. The depression of melting temperature of EVOH in the 10/90 EVOH/HDPE-g-HI blend indirectly indicated increased miscibility. The tensile strength of the EVOH/HDPE-g-HI blend was much higher than that of the EVOH/HDPE blend having no adhesion at each composition, and a dramatic increase in the impact strength was produced at the 90/10 EVOH/HDPE-g-HI blend composing of the fine HDPE-g-HI dispersions.     

Effect of core‐shell morphology evolution on the rheology,crystallization, and mechanical properties of PA6/EPDM‐g‐MA/HDPE ternary blend

In this article, polyamide 6 (PA6), maleic anhydride grafted ethylene‐propylene‐diene monomer (EPDM‐g‐MA), high‐density polyethylene (HDPE) were simultaneously added into an internal mixer to melt‐mixing for different periods. The relationship between morphology and rheological behaviors, crystallization, mechanical properties of PA6/EPDM‐g‐MA/HDPE blends were studied. The phase morphology observation revealed that PA6/EPDM‐g‐MA/HDPE (70/15/15 wt %) blend is constituted from PA6 matrix in which is dispersed core‐shell droplets of HDPE core encapsulated by EPDM‐g‐MA phase and indicated that the mixing time played a crucial role on the evolution of the core‐shell morphology. Rheological measurement manifested that the complex viscosity and storage modulus of ternary blends were notable higher than the pure polymer blends and binary blends which ascribed different phase morphology. Moreover, the maximum notched impact strength of PA6/EPDM‐g‐MA/HDPE blend was 80.7 KJ/m² and this value was 10–11 times higher than that of pure PA6. Particularly, differential scanning calorimetry results indicated that the bulk crystallization temperature of HDPE (114.6°C) was partly weakened and a new crystallization peak appeared at a lower temperature of around 102.2°C as a result of co‐crystal of HDPE and EPDM‐g‐MA. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2013     

Effect of confinement on glass dynamics and free volume in immiscible polystyrene/high‐density polyethylene blends

The effect of confinement on glass dynamics combined with the corresponding free volume changes of amorphous polystyrene (PS) in blends with semi‐crystalline high‐density polyethylene (HDPE) have been investigated using thermal analyses and positron annihilation lifetime spectroscopy (PALS). Two different glass transition temperatures (T_g) were observed in a PS/HDPE blend due to the dissimilarity in the chemical structure, consistent with an immiscible blend. However, T_g of PS in the incompatible PS/HDPE blend showed an upward trend with increasing PS content resulting from the confinement effect, while T_g of the semi‐crystalline HDPE component became lower than that of neat HDPE. Moreover, the elevation of T_g of PS was enhanced with a decrease of free volume radius by comparing annealed and unannealed PS/HDPE blends. Positron results showed that the free volume radius clearly decreased with annealing for all compositions, although the free volume hole size agreed well with linear additivity, indicating that there was only a weak interaction between the two components. Combining PALS with thermal analysis results, the confinement effect on the glass dynamics and free volume of PS phase in PS/HDPE blends could be attributed to the shrinkage of HDPE during crystallization when HDPE acted as the continuous phase. © 2015 Society of Chemical Industry     

Encapsulated phase structure and morphology evolution during quiescent annealing in ternary polymer blends with PA6 as matrix

This work is aim to study the encapsulated morphology development in ternary blends of polyamide 6/high density polyethylene/maleic anhydride‐grafted‐ethylene propylene diene monomer (PA6/HDPE/EPDM‐g‐MA) and polyamide 6/maleic anhydride‐grafted‐high density polyethylene/ethylene propylene diene monomer (PA6/HDPE‐g‐MA/EPDM) through thermodynamically control described by Harkins spreading theory. The phase morphology was confirmed by using scanning electron microscope (SEM) and selective solvent extraction revealed that PA6/HDPE/EPDM‐g‐MA blend having a composition of 70/15/15 vol % is constituted of polyamide 6 matrix with dispersed composite droplets of HDPE subinclusions encapsulated by EPDM‐g‐MA phase, while for PA6/HDPE‐g‐MA/EPDM blend with the same composition is constituted of polyamide 6 matrix with dispersed composite droplets of HDPE‐g‐MA subinclusions encapsulated by EPDM phase. Quiescent annealing test revealed that for PA6/HDPE/EPDM‐g‐MA blend, a perfect core–shell structure with one HDPE particle encapsulated by EPDM‐g‐MA phase was formed during annealing, and for PA6/HDPE‐g‐MA/EPDM blend, a novel complete inverting HDPE‐g‐MA/EPDM core/shell structure was achieved. Moreover, quantitative analysis about coalescent behaviors of HDPE‐g‐MA and HDPE subinclusions during quiescent annealing were investigated by image analysis and the result suggested that the grafted maleic anhydride group in HDPE‐g‐MA, acted as a role of steric repulsion, could suppress coalescence effects, thus leaded to a lower coalescent rate than that of HDPE subinclusions. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2014 , 131, 39937.     

Morphology and properties of nylon 6 and high density polyethylene blends in presence of nanoclay and PE‐g‐MA

In this study, we report the synergistic effect of nanoclay and maleic anhydride grafted polyethylene (PE‐g‐MA) on the morphology and properties of (80/20 w/w) nylon 6/high density polyethylene (HDPE) blend. Polymer blend nanocomposites containing nanoclay with and without compatibilizer (PE‐g‐MA) were prepared by melt mixing, and their morphologies and structures were examined with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and wide angle X‐ray diffractometer (WAXD) study. The size of phase‐separated domains decreased considerably with increasing content of nanoclay and PE‐g‐MA. WAXD study and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) revealed the presence of exfoliated clay platelets in nylon 6 matrix, as well as, at the interface of the (80/20 w/w) nylon 6/HDPE blend–clay nanocomposites. Addition of PE‐g‐MA in the blend–clay nanocomposites enhanced the exfoliation of clays in nylon 6 matrix and especially at the interface. Thus, exfoliated clay platelets in nylon 6 matrix effectively restricted the coalescence of dispersed HDPE domains while PE‐g‐MA improved the adhesion between the phases at the interface. The use of compatibilizer and nanoclay in polymer blends may lead to a high performance material which combines the advantages of compatibilized polymer blends and the merits of polymer nanocomposites. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2012     

Toughening of recycled poly(ethylene terephthalate)/glass fiber blends with ethylene–butyl acrylate–glycidyl methacrylate copolymer and maleic anhydride grafted polyethylene–octene rubber

The aim of this study was to improve the toughness of recycled poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET)/glass fiber (GF) blends through the addition of ethylene–butyl acrylate–glycidyl methacrylate copolymer (EBAGMA) and maleic anhydride grafted polyethylene–octene (POE‐g‐MAH) individually. The morphology and mechanical properties of the ternary blend were also examined in this study. EBAGMA was more effective in toughening recycled PET/GF blends than POE‐g‐MAH; this resulted from its better compatibility with PET and stronger fiber/matrix bonding, as indicated by scanning electron microscopy images. The PET/GF/EBAGMA ternary blend had improved impact strength and well‐balanced mechanical properties at a loading of 8 wt % EBAGMA. The addition of POE‐g‐MAH weakened the fiber/matrix bonding due to more POE‐g‐MAH coated on the GF, which led to weakened impact strength, tensile strength, and flexural modulus. According to dynamic rheometer testing, the use of both EBAGMA and POE‐g‐MAH remarkably increased the melt storage modulus and dynamic viscosity. Differential scanning calorimetry analysis showed that the addition of EBAGMA lowered the crystallization rate of the PET/GF blend, whereas POE‐g‐MAH increased it. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Mechanical and tribological behaviors of polyamide 66/ultra high molecular weight polyethylene blends

The blends of polyamide (PA) and ultra high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) were prepared by a Brabender DSE25 co‐twin screw extruder, and maleic anhydride (MAH) grafted high‐density polyethylene (HDPE) was used as a compatibilizer. A chemical reaction between MAH group of MAH‐g‐HDPE and terminal amino group of PA was testified by FT‐IR analysis. Mechanical and tribological tests showed that the tensile and bending strength of PA decrease with the increase of UHMWPE. Besides, the mechanical strengths of PA/UHMWPE blends were improved by adding appropriate MAH‐g‐HDPE. The chemical reaction between MAH‐g‐HDPE and PA ameliorated the homogeneous dispersing ability of UHMWPE in the blend. The friction coefficient and volume wear rate of the PA/UHMWPE blends decreased apparently with the increase of UHMWPE, as was probably that UHMWPE has straight chain structure and good flexibility; therefore, a transferring film could be easily formed on the steel surface with the increase of UHMWPE. In friction process, the wear resistance of the blends was relative to the mechanical property of the blends when the amount of the transferring layer reached to a certain value. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 47:738–744, 2007. © 2007 Society of Plastics Engineers.     

Compatibilization of high‐impact polystyrene/high‐density polyethylene blends by styrene/ethylene–butylene/styrene block copolymer

Compatibilization of polymer blends of high‐impact polystyrene (HIPS) and high‐density polyethylene (HDPE) blend by styrene/ethylene–butylene/styrene (SEBS) was elucidated. Polymer blends containing many ratios of HIPS and HDPE with various concentrations of SEBS were prepared. The Izod impact strength and elongation at break of the blends increased with increases in SEBS content. They increased markedly when the HDPE content was higher than 50 wt %. Tensile strength of blends increased when the SEBS concentration was not higher than 5 pphr. Whenever the SEBS loading was higher than 5 pphr, the tensile strength decreased and a greater decrease was found in blends in which the HDPE concentration was more than 50 wt %. The log additivity rule model was applied to these blends, which showed that the blends containing the HIPS‐rich phase gave higher compatibility at the higher shear rates. Surprisingly, the blends containing the HDPE‐rich phase yielded greater compatibility at the lower shear rates. Morphology observations of the blends indicated better compatibility of the blends with increasing SEBS concentration. The relaxation time (T₂) values from the pulsed NMR measurements revealed that both polymer blends became more compatible when the SEBS concentration was increased. When integrating all the investigations of compatibility compared with the mechanical properties, it is possible to conclude that SEBS promotes a certain level of compatibilization for several ratios of HIPS/HDPE blends. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 91: 742–755, 2004     

Rheological behavior comparison between PET/HDPE and PC/HDPE microfibrillar blends

The rheological behaviors of in situ microfibrillar blends, including a typical semicrystalline/semicrystalline (polyethylene terephthalate (PET)/high‐density polyethylene (HDPE)) and a typical amorphous/semicrystalline (polycarbonate (PC)/HDPE) polymer blend were investigated in this study. PET and PC microfibrils exhibit different influences on the rheological behaviors of microfibrillar blends. The viscosity of the microfibrillar blends increases with increased PET and PC concentrations. Surprisingly, the length/diameter ratio of the microfibrils as a result of the hot stretch ratio (HSR) has an opposite influence on the rheological behavior of the two microfibrillar blends. The stretched PET/HDPE blend exhibits higher viscosity than the unstretched counterpart, while the stretched PC/HDPE blend exhibits lower viscosity than the unstretched blend. The data obtained in this study will be helpful for constructing a technical foundation for the recycling and utilization of PET, PC, and HDPE waste mixtures by manufacturing microfibrillar blends in the future. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 45:1231–1238, 2005. © 2005 Society of Plastics Engineers