Effect of the components' molar mass and of the mixing conditions on the compatibilization of PE–LCP blends by PE‐g‐LCP copolymers

The rheology, morphology, and mechanical properties of blends of high‐density polyethylene (HDPE) with a semiflexible liquid crystalline copolyester (SBH) were studied in order to assess the compatibilizing ability of added PE‐g‐SBH copolymers, and its dependence on the molar mass of the PE matrix, and on the technique used for blend preparation. The PE‐g‐SBH copolymers were synthesized as described in previous articles, either by the polycondensation of the SBH monomers in the presence of a functionalized PE sample containing free carboxyl groups, or by reactive blending of the latter polymer with preformed SBH. Two samples of HDPE having different molar masses, and two samples of SBH with different melt viscosity and different microstructure, were used for preparing the blends. The two components and the compatibilizer were either blended in a single batch or used to prepare binary master blends to which the third component was added at a later stage. The results indicate that the PE‐g‐SBH copolymers do, in fact, compatibilize the PE–SBH blends and that the effect is more pronounced with the lower molar mass PE matrix and with the SBH sample having lower viscosity. The experiments carried out on blends prepared with different techniques show that the compatibilizing ability of the graft copolymer is improved if the latter is first blended with either of the two main components. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 71: 603–613, 1999     

Compatibilization of blends of polyethylene with a semirigid liquid crystalline polymer by PE-g-LCP copolymers

The blends of thermoplastics with liquid crystalline polymers show, in general, poor properties because of the lack of adherence between the two phases. The use of ad hoc synthesized copolymers containing the monomer units of the two polymers has been recently considered by some of us for blend compatibilization, and the results appear promising. In this work, new PE-g-LCP copolymers, prepared either by the synthesis of the LCP in the presence of a functionalized PE, or by reactive blending of the latter polymer with preformed LCP, have been employed as compatibilizing additives for blends of PE with a semirigid LCP. The morphology and the rheological and mechanical properties of the ternary blends, compared with those of samples without compatibilizers, or containing conventional maleic anhydride grafted PE, indicate that the PE-g-LCP copolymers do in fact lead to an improvement of interfacial adhesion, both in the melt and in the solid state, as well as to a modest enhancement of the mechanical properties. The results may be rationalized considering that the PE-g-LCP copolymers used by us consist of fairly short PE backbones with LCP grafts of various length. The molecules with longer LCP branches are thought to become mixed at the surface of the LCP particles and to give rise to fairly weak interaction with the PE matrix. It is argued that new PE-g-LCP copolymers synthesized from higher molar mass functionalized PE samples might show much better compatibilizing performance.     

Reactive compatibilization of PP/PBT blends by a mixture of PP‐g‐MA and epoxy resin

In this study, dual compatibilizers composed of the commercially available maleic anhydride‐grafted polypropylene (PP–MA) and a multifunctional epoxy resin were demonstrated to effectively compatibilize the immiscible and incompatible blends of PP and poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT). The PP–MA with a low MA content is totally miscible with PP to make the PP phase quasi‐functionalized, so that the multifunctional epoxy has the chance to react with PBT and PP–MA simultaneously to form PP–MA‐co‐epoxy‐co‐PBT copolymers at the interface. These desired copolymers are able to anchor along the interface and serve as efficient compatibilizers. The compatibilized blends, depending on the quantity of dual compatibilizers employed, exhibit higher viscosity, finer phase domain, and improved mechanical properties. Epoxy does not show compatibilization effects for the PP/PBT blends without the presence of PP–MA in the blends. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 79: 2272–2285, 2001     

Grafting of polystyrene branches to polyethylene and polypropylene

Polyethylene (PE) and polypropylene (PP) were reacted with benzoyl peroxide (BPO) and 2,2,6,6‐tetramethyl‐1‐piperidinyloxy (TEMPO) to prepare PE‐TEMPO and PP‐TEMPO macroinitiators, respectively. Molecular weight of PP decreased, whereas that of PE increased during the reaction with the BPO/TEMPO system. Polystyrene (PS) branches were grafted to PE and PP backbone chains as a result of bulk polymerization of styrene with the PE‐TEMPO and PP‐TEMPO macroinitiators. A significant amount of PS homopolymer was produced as a byproduct. Weight of the resulting PE‐g‐PS and PP‐g‐PS increased with the polymerization time up to 20 h and then leveled off. Melting point of PE and PP domains in PE‐g‐PS and PP‐g‐PS, respectively, lowered as the content of PS in the copolymers increased. However, glass transition of the copolymers was almost identical with that of PS homopolymer, indicating that the constituents in the copolymers were all phase‐separated from each other. In scanning electron microscopy of the incompatible PE/PS, PP/PS, and PE/PP/PS compounded with PE‐g‐PS and PP‐g‐PS, any clear indication of enhanced adhesion between the phases was not observed. However, phase domains in the blends were, nevertheless, reduced significantly to raise mechanical properties such as maximum stress and elongation at break by 20–75%. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 83: 1103–1111, 2002     

Effect of the molecular weight of maleated polypropylenes on the melt compounding of polypropylene/organoclay nanocomposites

Maleic anhydride grafted polypropylene (PP‐g‐MA) and organically modified clay composites were prepared in a plasticorder. PP‐g‐MAs, including Polybond PB3150, Polybond PB3200, Polybond PB3000, and Epolene E43, with a wide range of maleic anhydride (MA) concentrations and molecular weights were used. The structure was investigated with X‐ray diffraction (XRD) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). PP‐g‐MA compatibilizers gave rise to similar degrees of dispersion beyond the weight ratio of 3/1, with the exception of E43, which had the highest MA content and the lowest molecular weight. The thermal instability and high melt index were responsible for the ineffective modification by E43. Furthermore, PP‐g‐MA with a lower molecular weight and a higher melt index had to be compounded at a lower mixing temperature to achieve a reasonable level of torque for clay dispersion. Polypropylene/organoclay nanocomposites were then modified with different levels of PP‐g‐MA compatibilizers with a twin‐screw extruder. The polypropylene/E43/clay system, as shown by XRD patterns and TEM observations, yielded the poorest clay dispersion of the compatibilizers under investigation. The curves of the relative complex viscosity also revealed a systematic trend with the extent of exfoliation and showed promise for quantifying the hybrid structure of the nanocomposites. The mechanical properties and thermal stability were determined by dynamical mechanical analysis and thermogravimetric analysis, respectively. Although PP‐g‐MA with a lower molecular weight led to better clay dispersion in the polypropylene nanocomposites, it caused deterioration in both the mechanical and thermal properties of the hybrid systems. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 97: 1667–1680, 2005     

Compatibilization of polypropylene/ poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate) blends

Blending polypropylene (PP) with biodegradable poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate) (PHB) can be a nice alternative to minimize the disposal problem of PP and the intrinsic brittleness that restricts PHB applications. However, to achieve acceptable engineering properties, the blend needs to be compatibilized because of the immiscibility between PP and PHB. In this work, PP/PHB blends were prepared with different types of copolymers as possible compatibilizers: poly(propylene‐g‐maleic anhydride) (PP–MAH), poly (ethylene‐co‐methyl acrylate) [P(E–MA)], poly(ethylene‐co‐glycidyl methacrylate) [P(E–GMA)], and poly(ethylene‐co‐methyl acrylate‐co‐glycidyl methacrylate) [P(E–MA–GMA)]. The effect of each copolymer on the morphology and mechanical properties of the blends was investigated. The results show that the compatibilizers efficiency decreased in this order: P(E–MA–GMA) > P(E–MA) > P(E–GMA) > PP–MAH; we explained this by taking into consideration the affinity degree of the compatibilizers with the PP matrix, the compatibilizers properties, and their ability to provide physical and/or reactive compatibilization with PHB. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2012     

Morphology and rheology of HDPE/LCP blends compatibilized by a novel PE-g-LCP copolymer

A novel graft copolymer (PE-g-LCP) consisting of polyethylene (PE) backbones and liquid crystalline polymer (LCP) branches was synthesized via reactive blending of an acrylic acid-functionalized PE (Escor 5000 by Exxon) with a semiflexible LCP (SBH 1 : 1 : 2 by Eniricerche S.p.A.). The crude reactive blending product (COP) was shown by investigation of the fractions soluble in boiling toluene and xylene and of the residue to contain unreacted Escor and SBH, together with the graft copolymer forming the interphase. The compatibilizing activity of COP for PE/SBH blends, compared to that of pure Escor, was investigated using two PE grades. The COP addition into 80/20 PE/SBH blends caused a much stronger reduction of the SBH droplet dimensions and morphology stabilization than did that of pure Escor. The rheological behavior of the samples showed that COP leads to a slight increase of interfacial adhesion in the melt as well and that the effect is more pronounced when lower molar mass PE grade is used as the blend matrix. Melt-spinning tests demonstrated that deformation of the SBH droplets into highly oriented fibrils can be obtained for the blends of lower molar mass PE, compatibilized with small amounts of the novel PE-g-SBH copolymer. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 73: 2069–2077, 1999     

Phase structure and viscoelastic properties of compatibilized blends of PET and HDPE recyclates

Immiscible blends of recycled poly(ethylene terephthalate) (R‐PET), containing some amount of polymeric impurities, and high‐density polyethylene (R‐PE), containing admixture of other polyolefins, in weight compositions of 75 : 25 and 25 : 75 were compatibilized with selected compatibilizers: maleated styrene–ethylene/butylene–styrene block copolymer (SEBS‐g‐MA) and ethylene–glycidyl methacrylate copolymer (EGMA). The efficiency of compatibilization was investigated as a function of the compatibilizer content. The rheological properties, phase structure, thermal, and viscoelastic behavior for compatibilized and binary blends were studied. The results are discussed in terms of phase morphology and interfacial adhesion among components. It was shown that the addition of the compatibilizer to R‐PET‐rich blends and R‐PE‐rich blends increases the melt viscosity of these systems above the level characteristic for the respective binary blends. The dispersion of the minor phase improved with increasing compatibilizer content, and the largest effects were observed for blends compatibilized with EGMA. Calorimetric studies indicated that the presence of a compatibilizer had a slight affect on the crystallization behavior of the blends. The dynamic mechanical analysis provided evidence that the occurrence of interactions of the compatibilizer with blend components occurs through temperature shift and intensity change of a β‐relaxation process of the PET component. An analysis of the loss spectra behavior suggests that the optimal concentration of the compatibilizers in the considered blends is close to 5 wt %. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 82: 1423–1436, 2001     

Synthesis of PP–LCP graft copolymers and their compatibilizing activity for PP/LCP blends

The aim of this work was the synthesis of new graft copolymers consisting of polypropylene (PP) backbones and liquid crystalline polymer (LCP) branches, to be used as compatibilizing agents for PP/LCP blends. The PP-g-LCP copolymers have been prepared by polycondensation of the monomers of a semiflexible liquid crystalline polyester (SBH 1 : 1 : 2), that is, sebacic acid (S), 4,4′-dihydroxybiphenyl (B), and 4-hydroxybenzoic acid (H) in the mole ratio of 1 : 1 : 2, carried out in the presence of appropriate amounts of a commercial acrylic-acid-functionalized polypropylene (PPAA). The polycondensation products, referred to as COPP50 and COPP70, having a calculated PPAA concentration of 50 and 70 wt %, respectively, have been fractionated with boiling toluene and xylene, and the soluble and insoluble fractions have been characterized by Fourier transform infrared and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), differential scanning calorimetry, and X-ray diffraction. All analytical characterizations have concordantly shown that the products are formed by intricate mixtures of unreacted PPAA and SBH together with PP-g-SBH copolymers of different composition. Exploratory experiments carried out by adding small amounts of COPP50 or COPP70 into binary mixtures of isotactic polypropylene (iPP) and SBH while blending have demonstrated that this practice leads to an appreciable improvement of the dispersion of the minor LCP phase, as well as to an increase of the crystallization rate of iPP. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 69: 391–403, 1998     

Synthesis and characterization of a PE-g-LCP copolymer

The possibility of reinforcing polyethylene (PE) by blending it with a liquid crystalline polymer (LCP) rests on the successful improvement of phase compatibility and interfacial adhesion of these two structurally unlike polymers. The approach that is being considered in our laboratories consists of the synthesis of PE–LCP block or graft copolymers and of their use as compatibilizing agents for PE/LCP blends. In this work, the melt polycon-densation of sebacic acid (S), 4,4′-dihydroxybiphenyl (B), and 4-hydroxybenzoic acid (H) has been carried out at temperatures up to 280°C in the presence of an oxidized low molar mass PE sample containing free carboxylic groups (PEox), with the main scope of demonstrating that a PE-g-LCP copolymer may be synthesized by this route. The polycon-densation product has been fractionated by successive extractions with boiling toluene and xylene. The soluble fractions and the residues have been characterized by IR and NMR spectroscopy, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), thermogravimetric analysis (TG, DTG), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The extractions and the analyses have been repeated on a PEox/LCP blend prepared by melt mixing PEox and preformed LCP (SBH 112, by Eniricerche). The results show that, whereas for the blend a fairly clean separation of PEox and SBH can be obtained by solvent extraction, this is not so for the polycondensation product. All analytical procedures concordantly show that a PEox-g-SBH copolymer has, in fact, been obtained. In effect, both PEox and SBH chain segments are present, with different relative ratios, in all fractions of the polycondensate. Moreover, a fairly quantitative esterification of the PEox carboxyl groups has been shown by IR analysis to take place in the adopted conditions. Preliminary morphological investigations carried out by SEM have shown that the addition of the synthesized graft copolymer into HDPE/SBH blends leads to an improvement of the interfacial adhesion. © 1996 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Melt‐mixed polypropylene/acrylonitrile‐butadiene‐styrene blends with multiwall carbon nanotubes: Effect of compatibilizer and modifier on morphology and electrical conductivity

Cocontinuous blends of 45/55 polypropylene (PP)/acrylonitrile‐butadiene‐styrene (ABS) with multiwall carbon nanotubes (MWNT) were prepared by melt‐mixing in a conical twin‐screw microcompounder. PP‐grafted‐maleic anhydride (PP‐g‐MA) and styrene MA were used as compatibilizers for PP/ABS blends. Scanning electron microscopic observations showed phase segregation of PP‐g‐MA in the blends. State of dispersion of MWNT in the presence or absence of the compatibilizers was assessed through AC electrical conductivity measurements and crystallization studies of the blends. An improvement in AC electrical conductivity was observed in blends in presence of either styrene MA or dual compatibilizers. The lowest electrical percolation threshold was achieved at 0.1 wt % of MWNT using sodium salt of 6‐amino hexanoic acid‐modified MWNT. Significant increase in crystallization temperature of PP phase of blends with MWNT was observed in the presence of compatibilizers as compared to blends without compatibilizers. An attempt has been made to address the complex issues of phase segregation, compatibilization, and dispersion of MWNT in cocontinuous blends of PP/ABS. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011     

The effect of compatibilizers and organically modified nanoclay on the morphology and performance properties of poly(acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene)/polypropylene blends

In this study, poly(acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene)/polypropylene (ABS/PP) blends with various compositions were prepared by melt intercalation in a twin‐screw extruder. Modifications of the above blends were performed by using organically modified montmorillonite (OMMT, Cloisite 30B) reinforcement as well as two types of compatibilizers, namely polypropylene grafted with maleic anhydride (PP‐g‐MAH) and ABS grafted with maleic anhydride (ABS‐g‐MAH). Increasing the PP content in ABS matrix seems to increase the melt flow and thermal stability of their blends, whereas a deterioration of the tensile properties was recorded. On the other hand, the addition of ABS to PP promotes the formation of the β‐crystalline phase, which became maximum at 30 wt% ABS concentration, and increases the crystallization temperature (T_c) of PP. A tendency for increase of T_c was also recorded by incorporation of the above compatibilizers, whereas the glass transition temperature (T_g) of PP and SAN phase in ABS was reduced. Regarding the Young's modulus, the greatest improvement was observed in pure ABS/PP blends containing organically modified nanoclay. However, in reinforced pure PP, the use of compatibilizers is recommended in order to improve the elastic modulus. The addition of OMMT to noncompatibilized and compatibilized ABS/PP blends significantly improves their storage modulus. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 56:458–468, 2016. © 2016 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Reactive mixing of PET and PET/PP blends with glycidyl methacrylate–modified styrene‐b‐(ethylene‐co‐olefin) block copolymers

Styrene‐b‐(ethylene‐co‐butylene)‐b‐styrene (SEBS) and styrene‐b‐(ethylene‐co‐propylene) (SEP, SEPSEP) block copolymers with different styrene contents and different numbers of blocks in the copolymer chain were functionalized by melt radical grafting with glycidyl methacrylate (GMA) and employed as compatibilizers for PET‐based blends. Binary blends of PET with both functionalized (SEBS‐g‐GMA, SEP‐g‐GMA, SEPSEP‐g‐GMA) and neat (SEBS, SEP, SEPSEP) copolymers (75 : 25 w/w) and ternary blends of PET and PP (75 : 25 w/w) with various amounts (2.5–10 phr) of both modified and unmodified copolymers were prepared in an internal mixer, and their properties were evaluated by SEM, DSC, melt viscosimetry, and tensile and impact tests. The roles of the chemical structure, grafting degree, and concentration of the various copolymers on blend compatibilization was investigated. The blends with the grafted copolymers showed a neat improvement of phase dispersion and interfacial adhesion compared to the blends with nonfunctionalized copolymers. The addition of grafted copolymers resulted in a marked increase in melt viscosity, which was accounted for by the occurrence of chemical reactions between the epoxide groups of GMA and the carboxyl/hydroxyl end groups of PET during melt mixing. Blends with SEPSEP‐g‐GMA and SEBS‐g‐GMA, at concentrations of 5–10 phr, showed a higher compatibilizing effect with enhanced elongation at break and impact resistance. The effectiveness of GMA‐functionalized SEBS was then compared to that of maleic anhydride–grafted SEBS. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 98: 2201–2211, 2005     

Study on the microstructures and mechanical behaviour of compatibilized polypropylene/polyamide‐6 blends

A series of blends of polypropylene (PP)–polyamide‐6 (PA6) with either reactive polyethylene–octene elastomer (POE) grafted with maleic anhydride (POE‐g‐MA) or with maleated PP (PP‐g‐MA) as compatibilizers were prepared. The microstructures and mechanical properties of the blends were investigated by means of tensile and impact testing and by scanning electron microscopy and transmission electron microscopy. The results indicated that the miscibility of PP–PA6 blends was improved with the addition of POE‐g‐MA and PP‐g‐MA. For the PP/PA6/POE‐g‐MA system, an elastic interfacial POE layer was formed around PA6 particles and the dispersed POE phases were also observed in the PP matrix. Its Izod impact strength was four times that of pure PP matrix, whilst the tensile strength and Young's modulus were almost unchanged. The greatest tensile strength was obtained for PP/PA6/PP‐g‐MA blend, but its Izod impact strength was reduced in comparison with the pure PP matrix. © 2002 Society of Chemical Industry     

Dynamic reaction inside co‐rotating twin screw extruder. II. Waste ground rubber tire powder/polypropylene blends

In this article, dynamic reaction of waste ground rubber tire powder/PP blends with compatibilizers is extended to commercially available waste rubber Viz. Ground rubber tire and PP for the possibility of getting recycled material with good mechanical properties. In the first part of the article it was shown that the compatibility of model material/PP blends has greatly improved. In this article, extensive studies have been carried out to study the effect of compatibilizers, in‐situ compatibilization of immiscible waste ground rubber tire (WGRT) powder/polyolefin blends of various concentrations was investigated by means of extrusion process using a co‐rotating twin screw extruder. It was observed that addition of small amounts of compatibilizers like SEBS‐g‐MA to the blends of WGRT and PP‐g‐MA can result in better mechanical properties than the blends with isotactic PP. The blends of WGRT powder and PP‐g‐MA with compatibilizer have better adhesion than those of isotactic PP blends as revealed by the morphological studies using AFM and SEM. The betterment in properties can be attributed to the presence of functional group, maleic anhydride in PP‐g‐MA. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 2007     

Dynamic rheological and morphological study of the compatibility of thermoplastic polyurethane/ethylene–octene copolymer blends

Two grafted ethylene–octene copolymers [POEs; i.e., POE‐g‐maleic anhydried (MAH) and aminated POE (denoted by POE‐g‐NH₂) were used as compatibilizers in immiscible blends of thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) and POE. The effects of the compatibilizers on the dynamic rheological properties and morphologies of the TPU/POE blends were investigated. The characteristic rheological behaviors of the blends indicated that the strong interactions between the two phases were due to the compatibilization. Microstructural observation confirmed that the compatibilizers were located at the interface in the blends and formed a stable interfacial layer and smaller dispersed phase particle size. Compared with POE‐g‐MAH, POE‐g‐NH₂ exhibited a better compatibilization effect in the TPU/POE blends. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

In situ compatibilized SAN/LCP blends through reactive copolymers

Styrene–acrylonitrile–glycidyl methacrylate (SAG) copolymers with various contents of glycidyl methacrylate (GMA) were used to compatibilize the incompatible blends of styrene–acrylonitrile (SAN) and a liquid crystalline polymer (LCP). These SAG copolymers contain reactive glycidyl groups that are able to react with the carboxylic acid and/or hydroxyl end groups of the LCP to form the SAG‐g‐LCP copolymers during melt processing. The in situ–formed graft copolymers tend to reside along the interface to reduce the interfacial tension and to increase the interface adhesion. The morphologies of the SAN/LCP blends were examined by using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), where the compatibilized SAN/LCP blends were observed with greater numbers and finer fibrils than those of the corresponding uncompatibilized blends. The mechanical properties of the blends increased after compatibilization. The presence of a small amount (200 ppm) of ethyl triphenylphosphonium bromide (ETPB) catalyst further promotes the graft reaction and improves the compatibilization. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 82: 3321–3332, 2001     

Comparison of olefin copolymers as compatibilizers for polypropylene and high‐density polyethylene

Some polyolefin elastomers were compared as compatibilizers for blends of polypropylene (PP) with 30 wt % high‐density polyethylene (HDPE). The compatibilizers included a multiblock ethylene–octene copolymer (OBC), two statistical ethylene–octene copolymers (EO), two propylene–ethylene copolymers (P/E), and a styrenic block copolymer (SBC). Examination of the blend morphology by AFM showed that the compatibilizer was preferentially located at the interface between the PP matrix and the dispersed HDPE particles. The brittle‐to‐ductile (BD) transition was determined from the temperature dependence of the blend toughness, which was taken as the area under the stress–strain curve. All the compatibilized blends had lower BD temperature than PP. However, the blend compatibilized with OBC had the best combination of low BD temperature and high toughness. Examination of the deformed blends by scanning electron microscopy revealed that in the best blends, the compatibilizer provided sufficient interfacial adhesion so that the HDPE domains were able to yield and draw along with the PP matrix. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2009     

Compatibilization of polyethylene terephthalate/polypropylene blends with styrene–ethylene/butylene–styrene (SEBS) block copolymers

Blends of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and polypropylene (PP) at compositions 20/80 and 80/20 were modified with three different styrene–ethylene/butyl–ene-styrene (SEBS) triblock copolymers with the aim of improving the compatibility and in particular the toughness of the blends. The compatibilizers involved an unfunctionalized SEBS and two functionalized grades containing either maleic anhydride (SEBS-g-MAH) or glycidyl methacrylate (SEBS-g-GMA) grafted to the midblock. The effects of the compatibilizers were evaluated by studies on morphology and mechanical, thermal and rheological properties of the blends. The additon of 5 wt % of a SEBS copolymer was found to stabilize the blend morphology and to improve the impact strength. The effect was, however, far more pronounced with the functionalized copolymers. Particularly high toughness combined with rather high stiffness was achieved with SEBS-g-GMA for the PET-rich composition. Addition of the functionalized SEBS copolymers resulted in a finer dispersion of the minor phase and clearly improved interfacial adhesion. Shifts in the glass transition temperature of the PET phase and increase in the melt viscosity of the compatibilized blends indicated enhanced interactions between the discrete PET and PP phases induced by the functionalized compatibilizer, in particular SEBS-g-GMA. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 65:241–249, 1997     

Reactive blending of a functionalized polyethylene with a semiflexible liquid crystalline copolyester

Reactive blends (50/50 w/w)of a low molar mass polyethylene containing free carboxylic groups (PEox) and a semiflexible liquid crystalline polyester (SBH 1:1:2, by Eniricerche) have been prepared at 240°C in a Brabender mixer, in the presence of Ti(OBu)₄ catalyst, for different mixing times (15,60, and 120 min). In order to prove the formation of a PE-g-SBH copolymer, the blends have been fractionated by successive extractions with boiling toluene and xylene. The soluble fractions and the residues have been analyzed by Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, thermogravimetry (TG and DTG), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). All analytical procedures concordantly show that PE-g-SBH copolymers with different compositions, arising from differences of either the number of PEox carboxylic groups entering the transesterification or the length of grafted SBH branches, are formed as a result of blending. Depending on the relative content of PE and SBH segments, the copolymers dissolve in the solvents, together with any unrreacted PEox, or remain in the residues, together with neat SBH. Qualitative IR analyses and quantitative TG measurements have shown that the amount of copolymers increases strongly with the mixing time. Preliminary SEM observations indicate that the unfractionated products of the reactive blending carried out with long (120 min) mixing times lead to improved interfacial adhesion and phase dispersion when added to PE/SBH blends. © 1996 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.