Two-step thermochemical electrolysis: An approach for green hydrogen production

Electrolysis and thermochemical water splitting are approaches to produce green hydrogen that use either an electrical potential (electrolysis) or a chemical potential (thermochemical water splitting) to split water. Electrolysis is technologically mature when applied at low temperatures, but it requires large quantities of electrical energy. In contrast to electrolysis, thermochemical water splitting uses thermal energy, as thermal energy can typically be supplied at a lower unit cost than electrical energy using concentrating solar power. Thermochemical water splitting, however, typically suffers from high thermal losses at the extremely high process temperatures required, substantially increasing the total energy required. We show how, by combining electrical and chemical potentials, a novel and cost-efficient water splitting process can be envisioned that overcomes some of the challenges faced by conventional electrolysis and thermochemical water splitting. It uses a mixed ionic and electronic conducting perovskite with temperature-dependent oxygen non-stoichiometry as an anode in an electrolyzer. If solar energy is used as the primary source of all energy required in the process, the cost of the energy required to produce hydrogen could be lower than in high-temperature electrolysis by up to 7%.     

Life cycle assessment of various hydrogen production methods

A comprehensive life cycle assessment (LCA) is reported for five methods of hydrogen production, namely steam reforming of natural gas, coal gasification, water electrolysis via wind and solar electrolysis, and thermochemical water splitting with a Cu–Cl cycle. Carbon dioxide equivalent emissions and energy equivalents of each method are quantified and compared. A case study is presented for a hydrogen fueling station in Toronto, Canada, and nearby hydrogen resources close to the fueling station. In terms of carbon dioxide equivalent emissions, thermochemical water splitting with the Cu–Cl cycle is found to be advantageous over the other methods, followed by wind and solar electrolysis. In terms of hydrogen production capacities, natural gas steam reforming, coal gasification and thermochemical water splitting with the Cu–Cl cycle methods are found to be advantageous over the renewable energy methods.     

Comparative assessment of hydrogen production methods from renewable and non-renewable sources

In this study, we present a comparative environmental impact assessment of possible hydrogen production methods from renewable and non-renewable sources with a special emphasis on their application in Turkey. It is aimed to study and compare the performances of hydrogen production methods and assess their economic, social and environmental impacts, The methods considered in this study are natural gas steam reforming, coal gasification, water electrolysis via wind and solar energies, biomass gasification, thermochemical water splitting with a Cu–Cl and S–I cycles, and high temperature electrolysis. Environmental impacts (global warming potential, GWP and acidification potential, AP), production costs, energy and exergy efficiencies of these eight methods are compared. Furthermore, the relationship between plant capacity and hydrogen production capital cost is studied. The social cost of carbon concept is used to present the relations between environmental impacts and economic factors. The results indicate that thermochemical water splitting with the Cu–Cl and S–I cycles become more environmentally benign than the other traditional methods in terms of emissions. The options with wind, solar and high temperature electrolysis also provide environmentally attractive results. Electrolysis methods are found to be least attractive when production costs are considered. Therefore, increasing the efficiencies and hence decreasing the costs of hydrogen production from solar and wind electrolysis bring them forefront as potential options. The energy and exergy efficiency comparison study indicates the advantages of biomass gasification over other methods. Overall rankings show that thermochemical Cu–Cl and S–I cycles are primarily promising candidates to produce hydrogen in an environmentally benign and cost-effective way.     

Economic comparison of solar hydrogen generation by means of thermochemical cycles and electrolysis

Hydrogen is acclaimed to be an energy carrier of the future. Currently, it is mainly produced by fossil fuels, which release climate-changing emissions. Thermochemical cycles, represented here by the hybrid-sulfur cycle and a metal oxide based cycle, along with electrolysis of water are the most promising processes for ‘clean’ hydrogen mass production for the future. For this comparison study, both thermochemical cycles are operated by concentrated solar thermal power for multistage water splitting. The electricity required for the electrolysis is produced by a parabolic trough power plant. For each process investment, operating and hydrogen production costs were calculated on a 50 MW_th scale. The goal is to point out the potential of sustainable hydrogen production using solar energy and thermochemical cycles compared to commercial electrolysis. A sensitivity analysis was carried out for three different cost scenarios. As a result, hydrogen production costs ranging from 3.9–5.6 €/kg for the hybrid-sulfur cycle, 3.5–12.8 €/kg for the metal oxide based cycle and 2.1–6.8 €/kg for electrolysis were obtained.     

Hydrogen from solar energy,a clean energy carrier from a sustainable source of energy

Solar energy is going to play a crucial role in the future energy scenario of the world that conducts interests to solar-to-hydrogen as a means of achieving a clean energy carrier. Hydrogen is a sustainable energy carrier, capable of substituting fossil fuels and decreasing carbon dioxide (CO₂) emission to save the world from global warming. Hydrogen production from ubiquitous sustainable solar energy and an abundantly available water is an environmentally friendly solution for globally increasing energy demands and ensures long-term energy security. Among various solar hydrogen production routes, this study concentrates on solar thermolysis, solar thermal hydrogen via electrolysis, thermochemical water splitting, fossil fuels decarbonization, and photovoltaic-based hydrogen production with special focus on the concentrated photovoltaic (CPV) system. Energy management and thermodynamic analysis of CPV-based hydrogen production as the near-term sustainable option are developed. The capability of three electrolysis systems including alkaline water electrolysis (AWE), polymer electrolyte membrane electrolysis, and solid oxide electrolysis for coupling to solar systems for H₂ production is discussed. Since the cost of solar hydrogen has a very large range because of the various employed technologies, the challenges, pros and cons of the different methods, and the commercialization processes are also noticed. Among three electrolysis technologies considered for postulated solar hydrogen economy, AWE is found the most mature to integrate with the CPV system. Although substantial progresses have been made in solar hydrogen production technologies, the review indicates that these systems require further maturation to emulate the produced grid-based hydrogen.     

Comparison of thermochemical,electrolytic, photoelectrolytic and photochemical solar-to-hydrogen production technologies

Hydrogen produced from solar energy is one of the most promising solar energy technologies that can significantly contribute to a sustainable energy supply in the future. This paper discusses the unique advantages of using solar energy over other forms of energy to produce hydrogen. Then it examines the latest research and development progress of various solar-to-hydrogen production technologies based on thermal, electrical, and photon energy. Comparisons are made to include water splitting methods, solar energy forms, energy efficiency, basic components needed by the processes, and engineering systems, among others. The definitions of overall solar-to-hydrogen production efficiencies and the categorization criteria for various methods are examined and discussed. The examined methods include thermochemical water splitting, water electrolysis, photoelectrochemical, and photochemical methods, among others. It is concluded that large production scales are more suitable for thermochemical cycles in order to minimize the energy losses caused by high temperature requirements or multiple chemical reactions and auxiliary processes. Water electrolysis powered by solar generated electricity is currently more mature than other technologies. The solar-to-electricity conversion efficiency is the main limitation in the improvement of the overall hydrogen production efficiency. By comparison, solar powered electrolysis, photoelectrochemical and photochemical technologies can be more advantageous for hydrogen fueling stations because fewer processes are needed, external power sources can be avoided, and extra hydrogen distribution systems can be avoided as well. The narrow wavelength ranges of photosensitive materials limit the efficiencies of solar photovoltaic panels, photoelectrodes, and photocatalysts, hence limit the solar-to-hydrogen efficiencies of solar based water electrolysis, photoelectrochemical and photochemical technologies. Extension of the working wavelength of the materials is an important future research direction to improve the solar-to-hydrogen efficiency.     

Hydrogen as a vector for central receiver solar utilities

An assessment is presented to use hydrogen or hydrogen-rich fuels as a vector in the Central Receiver Solar Utility (CRSU) concept.

The CRSU is conceived to meet primarily the domestic energy requirements for space heating and hot water production of a community. It normally operates to provide low grade heat with sensible seasonal heat storage and district heating systems. However, there are institutional problems connected with using sensible heat storage and low grade energy distribution systems into dwellings.

An alternative to this would be to produce hydrogen and hydrogen-rich fuels by using an advanced conversion technology and eliminate low grade heat storage and distribution systems. Two developing technologies, namely high temperature electrolysis and thermochemical processes, are considered for production of the vector. Then, an assessment is carried out at the conceptual level for fully dedicated Central Receiver Solar Utility Plants which integrate a central receiver system, thermochemical plant or electrical power generating system and synthetic fuel production plant with necessary auxiliary sub-systems.

It is shown that for a 10% capital recovery factor, the cost of hydrogen at the plant will be about $18 per GJ using thermochemical processes and about $20 per GJ using high temperature electrolysis processes.

The solar-hydrogen can also be converted to a more easily stored fuel for domestic use such as methanol, ethanol, ammonia or fuel oil. In this case, there is a distinct possibility that by using waste heavy fuels, tar sands and biomass, the cost of synthetic fuel can be considerably reduced.     

Efficient STEP (solar thermal electrochemical photo) production of hydrogen – an economic assessment

A consideration of the economic viability of hydrogen fuel production is important in the STEP (Solar Thermal Electrochemical Photo) production of hydrogen fuel. STEP is an innovative way to decrease costs and increase the efficiency of hydrogen fuel production, which is a synergistic process that can use concentrating photovoltaics (CPV) and solar thermal energy to drive a high temperature, low voltage, electrolysis (water-splitting), resulting in H₂ at decreased energy and higher solar efficiency. This study provides evidence that the STEP system is an economically viable solution for the production of hydrogen. STEP occurs at both higher electrolysis and solar conversion efficiencies than conventional room temperature photovoltaic (PV) generation of hydrogen. This paper probes the economic viability of this process, by comparing four different systems: (1) 10% or (2) 14% flat plate PV driven aqueous alkaline electrolysis H₂ production, (3) 25% CPV driven molten electrolysis H₂ production, and (4) 35% CPV driven solid oxide electrolysis H₂ production. The molten and solid oxide electrolysers are high temperature systems that can make use of light, normally discarded, for heating. This significantly increases system efficiency. Using levelized cost analysis, this study shows significant cost reduction using the STEP system. The total price per kg of hydrogen is shown to decrease from $5.74 to $4.96 to $3.01 to $2.61 with the four alternative systems. The advanced STEP plant requires less than one seventh of the land area of the 10% flat cell plant. To generate the 216 million kg H₂/year required by 1 million fuel cell vehicles, the 35% CPV driven solid oxide electrolysis requires a plant only 9.6 mi² in area. While PV and electrolysis components dominate the cost of conventional PV generated hydrogen, they do not dominate the cost of the STEP-generated hydrogen. The lower cost of STEP hydrogen is driven by residual distribution and gate costs.     

Thermoeconomic analysis and artificial neural network based genetic algorithm optimization of geothermal and solar energy assisted hydrogen and power generation

The study aims to optimize the geothermal and solar-assisted sustainable energy and hydrogen production system by considering the genetic algorithm. The study will be useful by integrating hydrogen as an energy storage unit to bring sustainability to smart grid systems. Using the Artificial Neural Network (ANN) based Genetic Algorithm (GA) optimization technique in the study will ensure that the system is constantly studied in the most suitable under different climatic and operating conditions, including unit product cost and the plant's power output. The water temperature of the Afyon Geothermal Power Plant varies between 70 and 130 °C, and its mass flow rate varies between 70 and 150 kg/s. In addition, the solar radiation varies between 300 and 1000 W/m² for different periods. The net power generated from the region's geothermal and solar energy-supported system is calculated as 2900 kW. If all of this produced power is used for hydrogen production in the electrolysis unit, 0.0185 kg/s hydrogen can be produced. The results indicated that the overall energy and exergy efficiencies of the integrated system are 4.97% and 16.0%, respectively. The cost of electricity generated in the combined geothermal and solar power plant is 0.027 $/kWh if the electricity is directly supplied to the grid and used. The optimized cost of hydrogen produced using the electricity produced in geothermal and solar power plants in the electrolysis unit is calculated as 1.576 $/kg H₂. The optimized unit cost of electricity produced due to hydrogen in the fuel cell is calculated as 0.091 $/kWh.     

Hydrogen production costs of a polymer electrolyte membrane electrolysis powered by a renewable hybrid system

In this work, a novel approach related to the production of hydrogen using a polymer electrolyte membrane electrolysis powered by a renewable hybrid system is proposed. The investigation is carried out by establishing energy balances in the different components constituting the combined renewable system. A mathematical model to predict the production of electricity and hydrogen is proposed. The discrepancies between the numerical results and those from the literature review do not exceed 7%. The results show that the overall efficiency and the capacity factor of the combined renewable system without thermal storage are 20 and 34%, respectively. The levelized cost of hydrogen also is 6.86 US$/kg. The effect of certain physical parameters such as optical efficiency, water electrolysis temperature, unit electrolysis capital cost and solar multiple on the performance of the combined system is investigated. The results show that the performance of hydrogen production is optimal when the solar installation is three times oversized. The results also show that the levelized cost of hydrogen for the optimal sized is 4.07 US$/kg. Finally, the proposed combined system can produce low cost hydrogen and compete with hybrid sulfur thermochemical cycles, conventional photovoltaic installations, concentrated photovoltaic thermal systems and wind farms developed in all regions of the world.     

Performance analysis and economic competiveness of 3 different PV technologies for hydrogen production under the impact of arid climatic conditions of Morocco

For green hydrogen production, the choice of the appropriate renewable energy source to drive the water electrolysis process is crucial. Currently, solar Photovoltaic (PV) energy is one of the most popular and cheapest renewable energy sources; however, the performance of this technology is highly affected by the weather condition especially after the exposition to harsh climate conditions for long periods. Accordingly, the aim of this study is to assess the appropriate PV technology for hydrogen production under the impact of arid climatic conditions. For this reason, we evaluated the hydrogen production from 3 PV technologies, namely: monocrystalline (m-Si), polycrystalline (p-Si) and amorphous (a-Si) technologies exposed outdoors for a period of 3 years under the arid climatic conditions of Errachidia, Morocco. In addition, the degradation rate of each technology has been calculated and its impact on hydrogen production and its cost has been investigated.The results show that, the technology with the higher yearly hydrogen yield is the p-Si with 37.07 kg/kWp, followed by the m-Si with 36.84 kg/kWp and finally the a-Si with 36.68 kg/kWp. As for the cost of hydrogen production, the lowest cost was found in the case of the p-Si technology as well with 4.89 $/kg, whereas for the m-Si and a-Si technologies it was found equal to 5.48 $/kg and 6.28 $/kg respectively. However, the evaluation the impact of the PV modules degradation reveals that p-Si is technology affect the most with an annual degradation rate of 0.92%, followed by the a-Si with 0.72% and m-Si technologies with 0.45%. Nonetheless, when taken in consideration the impact of the degradation on the cost of hydrogen production, the p-Si remain the most cost effective technology even though the cost has increase to 5.32 $/kg, 5.78 $/kg and 6.67 $/kg for the p-Si, m-Si and a-Si technologies respectively.     

Hydrogen production methods efficiency coupled to an advanced high-temperature accelerator driven system

Hydrogen, rather than oil, must be produced in volumes not provided by the currently employed methods. In this work, two high-temperature hydrogen production methods coupled with an advanced nuclear system are presented. A new design of a pebble-bed accelerator nuclear-driven system called TADSEA (Transmutation Advanced Device for Sustainable Energy Applications) was chosen because of the advantages in transmutation and safety. A detailed flowsheet of the high-temperature electrolysis process coupled to TADSEA through a Brayton gas cycle was developed using chemical process simulation software: Aspen HYSYS^®. It is obtained 0.1627 kg/s of hydrogen with the model with optimized operating conditions, resulting in an overall process efficiency of 34.51%, a value in the range of results reported by other authors. A conceptual design of a plant using the iodine-sulfur thermochemical water splitting cycle was carried out producing 5.66e-2 kg/s and electric energy in cogeneration. The overall efficiency was calculated performing an energy balance resulting in 22.56%. A brief hydrogen production cost estimation was performed for both methods obtaining 5.96$/kg for the sulfur-iodine (SI) and 4.8 $/kg for the high-temperature electrolysis (HTE) process.     

Technical and economic evaluation of solar hydrogen production by supercritical water gasification of biomass in China

A novel thermochemical method for solar hydrogen production was proposed by state key laboratory of multiphase flow in power engineering (SKLMFPE) of Xi’an Jiaotong University. In this paper, a technical and economic evaluation of the new solar hydrogen production technology was conducted. Firstly, the advantages of this new solar hydrogen production process, compared with other processes, were assessed and thermodynamic analysis of the new process was carried out. The results show that biomass gasification in supercritical water driven by concentrating solar energy may be used to achieve high efficiency solar thermal decomposition of water and biomass for hydrogen production. Secondly, the hydrogen production cost was analyzed using the method of the total annual revenue requirement. The estimated hydrogen production cost was 38.46RMB/kg for the experimental demonstration system with a treatment capacity of 1 ton wet biomass per hour, and it would be decreased to 25.1 RMB/kg if the treatment capacity of wet biomass increased from 1 t/h to 10 t/h. A sensitivity analysis was also performed and influence of parameters on the hydrogen production cost was studied. The results from technical and economic evaluation show that supercritical water gasification of biomass driven by concentrated solar energy is a promising technology for hydrogen production and it is competitive compared to other solar hydrogen production technologies.     

A review on integrated thermochemical hydrogen production from water

Hydrogen production from water splitting is considered one of the most environmentally friendly processes for replacing fossil fuels. Among the various technologies to produce hydrogen from water splitting, thermochemical cycles using chemical reagents have the advantage of scale up compared to other specific facilities or geological conditions required. According to thermochemical processes using chemical redox reactions, 2-, 3-, 4-step thermochemical water splitting cycles can generate hydrogen more efficiently due to reducing temperatures. Increasing the number of cycles or steps of thermochemical hydrogen production could reduce the required maximum temperature of the facility. In addition, recently developed hybrid thermochemical processes combined with electricity or solar energy have been studied on a large scale because of the reduced cost of hydrogen production. Additionally, hybrid thermochemical water splitting combined with renewable energy can result in not only reducing the cost, but also increasing hydrogen production efficiency in terms of energy. As for a green energy, hydrogen production from water splitting using sustainable and renewable energy is significant to protect biological environment and human health. Additionally, hybrid thermochemical water splitting is conducive to large scale hydrogen production. This paper reviews the multi-step and highly developed hybrid thermochemical technologies to produce hydrogen from water splitting based on recently published literature to understand current research achievements.     

Life cycle assessment of three types of hydrogen production methods using solar energy

A comprehensive life cycle assessment (LCA) is carried out for three methods of hydrogen production by solar energy: hydrogen production by PEM water electrolysis coupling photothermal power generation, hydrogen production by PEM water electrolysis coupling photovoltaic power generation, and hydrogen production by thermochemical water splitting method using S–I cycle coupling solar photothermal technology. The assessment also contains an evaluation of four environmental factors which are global warming potential, acidification potential, ozone depletion potential, and nutrient enrichment potential. After conducting a quantitative analysis of all three methods with environmental factors being considered, a conclusion has been drawn: The global warming potential and the acidification potential of the thermochemical water splitting by S–I cycle coupling solar photothermal technology are 1.02 kg CO₂-eq and 6.56E-3 kg SO₂-eq. And this method has significant advantages in the environmental impact of the whole ecosystem.     

Techno economic feasibility study on hydrogen production using concentrating solar thermal technology in India

The techno-economic analysis of hydrogen (H₂) production using concentrating solar thermal (CST) technologies is performed in this study. Two distinct hydrogen production methods, namely: a) thermochemical water splitting [model 1] and b) solid oxide electrolysers [model 2], are modeled by considering the total heat requirement and supplied from a central tower system located in Jaisalmer, India. The hourly simulated thermal energy obtained from the 10 MW_th central tower system is fed as an input to both these hydrogen production systems for estimating the hourly hydrogen production rate. The results revealed that these models yield hydrogen at a rate of 31.46 kg/h and 25.2 kg/h respectively for model 1 and model 2. Further, the Levelized cost of hydrogen (LCoH) for model 1 and model 2 is estimated as ranging from $ 8.23 and $ 14.25/kg of H₂ and $ 9.04 and $ 19.24/kg, respectively, for different scenarios. Overall, the present work displays a different outlook on real-time hydrogen production possibilities and necessary inclusions to be followed for future hydrogen plants in India. The details of the improvisation and possibilities to improve the LCoH are also discussed in this study.     

Prospects for solar only operation of the hybrid sulphur cycle for hydrogen production

The hybrid sulphur process is one of the most promising thermochemical water splitting cycles for large scale hydrogen production. While the process includes an electrolysis step, the use of sulphur dioxide in the electrolyser significantly reduces the electrical demand compared to conventional alkaline electrolysis. Solar operation of the cycle with zero emissions is possible if the electricity for the electrolyser and the high temperature thermal energy to complete the cycle are provided by solar technologies.This paper explores the possible use of photovoltaics (PV) to supply the electrical demand and examines a number of configurations. Production costs are determined for several scenarios and compared with base cases using conventional technologies. The hybrid sulphur cycle has promise in the medium term as a viable zero carbon production process if PV power is used to supply the electrolyser. However, the viability of this process is dependent on a market for hydrogen and a significant reduction in PV costs to around $1/W_p.     

Cost evaluation of two potential nuclear power plants for hydrogen production

Hydrogen is recognized as one of the most promising alternative fuels to meet the energy demand for the future by providing a carbon-free solution. In regards to hydrogen production, there has been increasing interest to develop, innovate and commercialize more efficient, effective and economic methods, systems and applications. Nuclear based hydrogen production options through electrolysis and thermochemical cycles appear to be potentially attractive and sustainable for the expanding hydrogen sector. In the current study, two potential nuclear power plants, which are planned to be built in Akkuyu and Sinop in Turkey, are evaluated for hydrogen production scenarios and cost aspects. These two plants will employ the pressurized water reactors with the electricity production capacities of 4800 MW (consisting of 4 units of 1200 MW) for Akkuyu nuclear power plant and 4480 MW (consisting of 4 units of 1120 MW) for Sinop nuclear power plant. Each of these plants are expected to cost about 20 billion US dollars. In the present study, these two plants are considered for hydrogen production and their cost evaluations by employing the special software entitled “Hydrogen Economic Evaluation Program (HEEP)” developed by International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) which includes numerous options for hydrogen generation, storage and transportation. The costs of capital, fuel, electricity, decommissioning and consumables are calculated and evaluated in detail for hydrogen generation, storage and transportation in Turkey. The results show that the amount of hydrogen cost varies from 3.18 $/kg H₂ to 6.17 $/kg H₂.     

Solar synthetic fuel production

In this paper, a thermodynamic study is presented on solar hydrogen production using concentrated solar energy. In the first part, the direct decomposition process has been studied. The temperature requirements at various partial pressures of H₂O, H₂ and H yields, thermal efficiency and separation of products are discussed. In the second part, using consistent costing bases, the cost of hydrogen is estimated for solar-direct decomposition process and solar-electrolysis process. It has been found that the solar-direct decomposition process concept provides hydrogen costs in the range of $22/GJ which are lower by $15–$26 than those provided by a solar electrolysis process.