A phase I-II study of paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and vinorelbine with filgrastim (rhG-CSF) support in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE: We designed a phase I-II trial of three active agents, paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and vinorelbine, in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to: 1) define the dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of paclitaxel with filgrastim (G-CSF) support; and 2) determine the overall response rate and median survival of patients treated on this regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We treated cohorts of patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC with ifosfamide 1.2-1.6 g/m2/day x 3 and vinorelbine 20-25 mg/m2/day x 3 and escalating doses of paclitaxel at 100-175 mg/m2 on day 2 with G-CSF support on a 21-day cycle. One prior experimental single-agent chemotherapy regimen was allowed. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients, were enrolled on this trial: 27 on the phase I portion of the study and an additional 29 at the recommended phase II dose (RPTD). Thirteen patients had received prior chemotherapy. Paclitaxel doses of 175 mg/m2 and 150 mg/m2 produced dose-limiting myelosuppression, and the RPTD was determined to be paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 with ifosfamide 1.2 g/m2/day on days 1-3 and vinorelbine 20 mg/m2/ day on days 1-3 with G-CSF support. The overall response rate was 18%, with a median survival of 6.1 months. Six of 35 patients (17%) treated at the RPTD achieved a partial response to therapy. Grade IV neutropenia was observed in 19 of 35 patients at this dose, with eight patients suffering febrile neutropenia. CONCLUSIONS: This non-cisplatin-containing three-drug regimen has substantial toxicity and low activity in advanced NSCLC, and does not seem to improve on prior regimens. It is unclear whether the lack of efficacy relates to an antagonistic reaction between the specific drugs, administration schedule, or to subtherapeutic doses of the individual agents.     

Phase II trial of paclitaxel and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with pancreatic carcinoma: a Southwest Oncology Group study

PURPOSE: Pancreatic cancer is difficult to treat, with most patients surgically unresectable at the time of diagnosis. Radiotherapy and chemotherapy can offer palliation, but more effective therapy is needed. This trial evaluated the effects of an aggressive schedule of paclitaxel given with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients were required to have a histologic diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma with measurable disease and no prior chemotherapy or radiation therapy. Patients had to have performance status of 0 to 2, pretreatment absolute granulocyte count > or = 1,500/microL, and platelet count greater than or equal to the institutional lower limit of normal. Following pretreatment with dexamethasone, diphenhydramine, and cimetidine, patients received paclitaxel at a dose of 250 mg/m2 by 24-hour infusion on day 1, repeated every 21 days. G-CSF was given at a dose of 5 microg/kg/d on days 3 to 18 or until two consecutive absolute neutrophil counts (ANCs) > or = 10,000/microL were obtained. Doses of paclitaxel were modified depending on nadir counts. RESULTS: Forty-five patients were entered onto this study, with six ineligible. For the 39 eligible patients, there was one complete response (CR) and two partial responses (PRs), five stable/no responses, 23 increasing disease, two early deaths, and six patients whose assessment was inadequate to determine response. The response rate was therefore three of 39 or 8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2% to 21%). The median survival time for the 39 eligible patients was 5 months. The most common toxicities were anemia, leukopenia/granulocytopenia, malaise/fatigue, nausea/vomiting, alopecia, thrombocytopenia, paresthesias, and liver function abnormalities. There was one death due to sepsis. CONCLUSION: Single-agent paclitaxel in this dose and schedule has minimal activity in pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients.     

Paclitaxel by 3-h infusion and carboplatin in anthracycline-resistant advanced breast cancer. A phase II study conducted by the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group

37 patients with advanced breast cancer resistant to anthracyclines were treated with paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 by 3-h infusion and carboplatin at an area under the curve of 7 mg.min/ml every 4 weeks with G-CSF support. There were 5 (14%, 95% CI 3-25%) complete and 11 (30%, 95% CI 15-45%) partial responders. Median duration of response was 11.5 months (range 5.2-16.8+), median time to progression 8 months (range 0.26-16.8+) and median survival 12 months (range 0.5-19.6+). Grade 3-4 leucopenia (27%), thrombocytopenia (10%) and diarrhoea (5%) were noted. In conclusion, the combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin is active and well tolerated in patients with advanced breast cancer resistant to anthracyclines.     

Dose-dense therapy with weekly 1-hour paclitaxel infusions in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of paclitaxel administered as a 1-hour infusion on weekly basis, without interruption, to patients with metastatic breast cancer who had received prior therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty patients with metastatic breast cancer received sustained weekly paclitaxel therapy at an initial dose of 100 mg/m2 until disease progression. Prior therapy included adjuvant only (n=17), metastatic only (n=7), or both (n=6). Eighteen patients had received prior anthracycline therapy, 12 of whom had demonstrated progression of disease within 12 months of it. All patients were assessable for efficacy; 29 patients were assessable for toxicity. Pharmacokinetic studies of paclitaxel were also performed. RESULTS: A total of 469 weekly paclitaxel infusions were administered to 30 patients (median, 14 infusions/patient). The median delivered dose-intensity was 91 mg/m2/wk (range, 80 to 108). The overall response rate was 53% (95% confidence interval [CI], 34% to 72%), with 10% complete responses (CRs) and 43% partial responses (PRs). Median response duration was 7.5 months (range, 2 to 11+). Responses were observed in nine of 18 (50%) patients with prior anthracycline therapy, including six of 12 (50%) with disease progression on anthracycline within 1 year (three of four within 6 months). Therapy was well tolerated and remarkable for a lack of overall and cumulative myelosuppression. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in four patients; febrile neutropenia was not observed. Peripheral neuropathy prohibited dose escalation above 100 mg/m2, and grade 3 neuropathy was observed in two of 21 patients at < or = 100 mg/m2. CONCLUSION: Weekly paclitaxel therapy is active and well tolerated in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Weekly therapy should be considered as a current clinical option for these patients and should be incorporated into future comparative clinical trials.     

Phase II trial of weekly paclitaxel and concurrent radiation therapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer

We conducted a prospective Phase II study to determine the response rate, toxicity, and 2-year survival rate of concurrent weekly paclitaxel and radiation therapy (RT) for locally advanced unresectable non-small cell lung cancer. The weekly paclitaxel regimen was designed to optimize the radiosensitizing properties of paclitaxel. Thirty-three patients with unresectable stage IIIA and IIIB non-small cell lung cancer from six institutions were entered into the study between March 1994 and February 1995. Weekly i.v. paclitaxel (60 mg/m2; 3-h infusion) plus concurrent chest RT (60 Gy over 6 weeks) was delivered for 6 weeks. Twenty-nine patients were evaluable for response. Three patients achieved a complete response (10%), and 22 patients (76%) achieved a partial response, for an overall response rate of 86% (95% confidence interval, 68-96%). One patient progressed during the therapy, and three patients had stable disease. Esophagitis was the principal toxicity. Grade 3 or 4 esophagitis occurred in 11 patients (37%). One patient died of pneumonia after completion of therapy. Additional grade > or =3 toxicities included pneumonitis (12%) and neutropenia (6%). One patient had a grade 3 hypersensitivity reaction. The median overall survival duration for all 33 patients who entered the study was 20 months, and 1-, 2-, and 3-year overall survival rates were 60.6%, 33.3%, and 18.2%, respectively. The median progression-free survival duration for all 33 patients was 10.7 months, and 1-, 2-, and 3-year progression-free survival rates were 39.4%, 12.1%, and 6.1%, respectively. Weekly paclitaxel plus concurrent RT is a well-tolerated outpatient regimen. The survival outcome from this regimen is encouraging and seems to be at least equivalent to that of other chemotherapy/radiation trials. These findings warrant further clinical evaluation of weekly paclitaxel/RT in Phase II trials in the neoadjuvant setting and in combination with other cytotoxic agents.     

Phase II trial of paclitaxel and cisplatin in women with advanced breast cancer: an active regimen with limiting neurotoxicity

PURPOSE: A phase II study of paclitaxel and cisplatin in patients with advanced breast cancer was performed to determine the objective response rate and make further observations about the toxicity of this regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were required to have histologically proven adenocarcinoma of the breast with no more than one chemotherapeutic treatment for advanced disease. Treatment consisted of paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 administered as a 24-hour intravenous (i.v.) infusion followed by cisplatin 75 mg/m2 i.v. Patients received granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) 5 micrograms/kg subcutaneously on day 3 until WBC recovery. Cycles were repeated every 21 days. Patients continued to receive therapy until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: Forty-four patients entered the trial. Forty-two patients were assessable for response. Nineteen patients (43%) had no prior chemotherapy and 41 had no chemotherapy for metastatic disease. The median number of cycles administered per patient was five (range, one to seven). There were five complete responses (CRs) (11.9%) and 17 partial responses (PRs) (40.5%), with an overall response rate of 52.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 36.4% to 68.0%). Nine patients had stage III disease. The response rate for this group was 66.7% (95% CI, 33.0% to 92.5%), with three CRs and three PRs. Among 35 patients with stage IV disease, there were two CRs and 14 PRs, with an overall response rate of 48.5% (95% CI, 30.8% to 66.5%). Overall, the median response duration was 10.6 months. Thirty patients (68%) developed transient grade 4 neutropenia. Cumulative neuropathy was the major dose-limiting toxicity. After five cycles of chemotherapy, 96% of patients had at least grade 1 neurotoxicity and 52% had at least grade 2 neurotoxicity. One patient had a toxic death after cycle 1 of therapy. CONCLUSION: The combination of paclitaxel and cisplatin as first-line chemotherapy for women with advanced breast cancer is an active regimen. However, the cumulative neurotoxicity was significant and dose-limiting in the majority of patients.     

A phase II study of docetaxel in patients with paclitaxel-resistant metastatic breast cancer

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of docetaxel in patients with paclitaxel-resistant metastatic breast cancer (MBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Docetaxel (100 mg/m2) was administered every 3 weeks to 46 patients registered at four centers. Patients had previously received < or = two chemotherapy regimens for MBC. All patients had progressive disease while receiving paclitaxel therapy. Treatment was repeated until there was evidence of disease progression or for a maximum of three cycles after best response. RESULTS: Objective responses were seen in eight of 44 assessable patients (18.1%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.7% to 29.5%). Seven patients had partial responses and one patient responded completely. Response rates were not significantly different by previously received paclitaxel dose or resistance. No responses were seen in 12 patients who had previously received paclitaxel by 24-hour infusion, but the response rate in 32 patients who had received paclitaxel by 1- to 3-hour infusion was 25%. The median response duration was 29 weeks and the median time to disease progression was 10 weeks. Median survival was 10.5 months. Clinically significant (severe) adverse events included neutropenic fever (24% of patients), asthenia (22%), infection (13%), stomatitis (9%), neurosensory changes (7%), myalgia (7%), and diarrhea (7%). CONCLUSION: Docetaxel is active in patients with paclitaxel-resistant breast cancer, particularly in those who failed to respond to brief infusions of paclitaxel. Response rates were comparable to or better than those seen with other therapies for patients with paclitaxel-resistant MBC. This confirms preclinical studies, which indicated only partial cross-resistance between paclitaxel and docetaxel.     

Preliminary report of the activity of docetaxel in advanced or recurrent squamous cell cancer of the cervix

Eighteen patients with squamous cell cancer of the cervix were treated with i.v. docetaxel 100 mg/m2 over 1 h every 21 days. No patient received prior chemotherapy, except as a radiation sensitizer. Median age was 42 years (range 30-58) and Zubrod performance status was 1 (0-2). Ten (59%) patients had prior surgery and 11 (65%) had prior radiation therapy. Sixteen patients were evaluable for response. Two patients had a partial response (13%; 95% CI 0-32%) and eight (50%; 95% CI 23-77%) had stable disease. Dose reduction to 75 mg/m2 was required in 10 patients and to 55 mg/m2 in one patient. Granulocytopenia was the major hematopoietic toxicity (31% grade 3 and 44% grade 4). Docetaxel is active in patients with squamous cell cancer of the cervix and may be tolerable at this dose schedule.     

Paclitaxel by 96-hour continuous infusion in combination with cisplatin: a phase I trial in patients with advanced lung cancer

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of paclitaxel administered by 96-hour continuous infusion in combination with cisplatin, to determine if the addition of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) permits significant paclitaxel dose escalation, and to assess the toxicity and preliminary activity of this combination in patients with advanced lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty patients with untreated lung cancer were enrolled: 42 had advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and eight had extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Patients received paclitaxel doses of 100 to 180 mg/m2/96 hours and cisplatin doses of 60 to 80 mg/m2 as a single 30-minute bolus injection at the end of the paclitaxel infusion. RESULTS: Two of six patients experienced dose-limiting neutropenia at a dose of paclitaxel 140 mg/m2/96 hours and cisplatin 80 mg/m2. With G-CSF support, one of three patients experienced both dose-limiting mucositis and fatal neutropenic sepsis at a dose of paclitaxel 180 mg/m2/96 hours and cisplatin 80 mg/m2. Significant peripheral neuropathy developed in five patients and occurred after six or more cycles of therapy. Thirty-three of 42 patients with NSCLC had measurable disease; the objective response rate was 55%, with two complete responses and 16 partial responses. For all 42 patients with NSCLC, the median time to progression and median survival duration were 5 months and 10 months, respectively. The actuarial 1-year survival rate was 41%. Of eight SCLC patients, four responded to therapy, and the median survival duration for all SCLC patients was 11 months. CONCLUSION: The MTD without G-CSF is paclitaxel 120 mg/m2/96 hours and cisplatin 80 mg/m2, and the MTD with G-CSF is paclitaxel 160 mg/m2/96 hours and cisplatin 80 mg/m2. Infusional paclitaxel with cisplatin is well tolerated and active in patients with advanced NSCLC.     

Three unrelated perturbations similarly uncouple fluid, bulk-membrane, and receptor endosomal flow in rat fetal fibroblasts

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: We investigated the efficacy and tolerability of two doses of paclitaxel, 175 mg/m2 and 135 mg/m2, over a 3-hr infusion, without prophylactic G-CSF, in heavily pretreated patients with anthracycline-resistant breast cancer. Although paclitaxel may share with anthracyclines a common mechanism of drug resistance, there is evidence that the two drugs are not completely cross resistant. METHODS: From July 1994 to January 1996, 42 patients were treated every 3 weeks, for a maximum of 6 cycles; paclitaxel dose was established according to pretreatment extension. RESULTS: In 41 assessable patients we observed 9 partial responses, for an overall response rate of 22% (95% CI, 10-34%). There was no difference in response rate between the two dose levels. Median duration of response was 9 months, median time to progression 5 months, and median survival 9 months. The dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenia, which was grade 3-4 in 40% (135 mg/m2) and 62% (175 mg/m2) of the patients (P = 0.28); neutropenic fever occurred in 24% of the patients, without significant differences between the two dose levels. Other toxicity was mild to moderate. CONCLUSIONS: Paclitaxel at doses of 175 mg/m2 or 135 mg/m2 is active and well tolerated in advanced breast cancer patients resistant to anthracyclines. The prophylactic use of colony-stimulating factors seems appropriate in heavily pretreated patients given the higher dose level.     

A phase II trial of amonafide in patients with nonsquamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. A Gynecologic Oncology Group study

Twenty-seven patients with nonsquamous cell carcinoma of the cervix were entered into a Phase II study of amonatide; 24 patients were evaluable for toxicity, while 23 were evaluable for response. Patients received amonafide, 300 mg/m2, intravenously for 5 consecutive days every 3 weeks. The median age of patients was 45 years. All but two patients were completely ambulatory. Twelve patients had received prior chemotherapy, while 22 had been treated with radiation therapy. One of 27 (4.3%) patients had a partial response (PR) to this regimen and 13 (56.5%) had stable disease. Sixteen patients experienced a median white blood cell (WBC) nadir of 350/mm3, seven developed life-threatening thrombocytopenia, and one had severe anemia requiring transfusion. Nonhematologic toxicity was mild. Amonafide had insignificant activity in these patients with nonsquamous cell carcinoma of the cervix.     

A dose-finding study of ifosfamide by three-day continuous infusion in pretreated, advanced breast cancer patients

The purpose of the study was to establish the maximum tolerated dose of ifosfamide, administered over 72 hr, in metastatic breast cancer patients, pretreated with chemotherapy. Ifosfamide and mesna were given at the same dose, in the same solution, using a portable Pharmacia CADD-1 pump connected to a central venous access, at three dose levels: 7.5 g/m2 (6 patients), 9 g/m2 (8 patients), 10.5 g/m2 (3 patients); the courses were repeated every 3 weeks. Seventeen patients with a median age of 55 years (range, 34-68) and median performance status of 0 (range, 0-2) were treated. The patients were pretreated with a median of 2 (range, 1-3) prior regimens including anthracyclines in 14 patients and paclitaxel in 9. Dose-limiting toxicity was defined as the occurrence of any of the following events in > or = 2/6 patients: absolute neutrophil count < 500/ml for > 7 days or < 100/ml for > 3 days; febrile neutropenia; grade 4 thrombocytopenia; any grade > or = 3 nonhematologic toxicity. The dose-limiting toxicities were febrile neutropenia and grade 4 thrombocytopenia in 2/3 patients treated at 10.5 g/m2. Seven patients achieved an objective response (response rate 41%; 95% CI, 18% to 67%). We conclude that 72-hr infusion of ifosfamide is feasible in ambulatory patients. The recommended dose for phase II studies is 9 g/m2, with courses repeated every 21 days.     

Australian multicentre phase II trial of paclitaxel in women with metastatic breast cancer and prior chemotherapy

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and safety of paclitaxel given as a three-hour infusion in patients with metastatic breast cancer which had progressed despite hormonal therapy and/or chemotherapy. DESIGN AND SETTING: Multicentre phase it trial undertaken in five major centres or hospitals in Sydney, Melbourne and Adelaide. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 50 patients with clinically or radiologically measurable or evaluable metastatic breast cancer recruited between March and July 1993. All had received prior chemotherapy, with subsequent disease progression. INTERVENTION: Paclitaxel (Anzatax, Faulding) was given at a dose of 175 mg/m2 intravenously over three hours every three weeks for up to nine courses. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Response rate (partial or complete); duration of progression-free survival; duration of survival; and adverse reactions. RESULTS: Patients had a median age of 51 years; 62% had received at least two prior drug regimens for metastatic breast cancer and 48% had anthracycline-resistant tumours. A median of six paclitaxel courses was given per patient. Overall response rate was 18% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 9%-31%), with complete responses in four patients (8%). In patients with anthracycline-resistant tumours, response rate was 25% (95% CI, 10%-47%). Response was not influenced by extent of prior treatment. Estimated median progression-free survival was 4.1 months (95% CI, 3.2-6.0 months) and estimated median survival was 6.3 months (95% CI, 6.2-10.3 months). Treatment was well tolerated, with neutropenia the major toxic effect. CONCLUSIONS: Paclitaxel (three-hour infusion) has significant activity in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer, including anthracycline-resistant tumours.     

Phase II trial of paclitaxel and carboplatin in the treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma

PURPOSE: Both paclitaxel and carboplatin have single-agent activity against carcinoma of the urothelium. We evaluated the combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin in the treatment of advanced cancers of the urothelium. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with cancers of the urothelium who had no prior chemotherapy (prior adjuvant chemotherapy > 6 months allowed) were eligible for treatment. Eligibility requirements were performance status of 2 or less, creatinine level less than 2.0 mg/dL, granulocyte count (AGC) 1,500/microL or greater, platelet count 100,000/microL or greater, and total bilirubin level less than 1.5 mg/dL. Paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 followed by carboplatin (area under the curve [AUC] 5, Calvert formula) were administered every 21 days. Patients were evaluated for toxicity weekly and assessed for response every 6 weeks. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients were entered onto the study and 35 patients were assessable for response. A total of 184 cycles were administered (median, six cycles per patient). Nine patients required one dose reduction, and seven patients required two dose reductions for a nadir AGC less than 500/microL, with only one episode of febrile neutropenia and sepsis. Myalgias and arthralgias of grades 1 to 2 occurred in 16 patients and usually lasted 2 to 3 days after treatment. There were no treatment delays because of toxicity. There were 18 responses; seven complete responses (CRs) and 11 partial responses (PRs) (response rate 51.5%; 95% confidence interval, 35 to 68). Median response durations for CR and PR were 6 and 4 months, respectively. Overall median survival was 9.5 months. CONCLUSION: The combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin is an active and well-tolerated regimen for the treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma. Because of the modest toxicity of this combination, paclitaxel and carboplatin should be considered for addition to other agents with activity in urothelial carcinomas.     

Chemotherapy immediately following autologous stem-cell transplantation in patients with advanced breast cancer

Most patients relapse after high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) with autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) for metastatic breast cancer. Further chemotherapy immediately after hematopoietic recovery from ASCT is not given for fear of irreversibly damaging the newly engrafted stem cells. In a pilot chemoprotection trial, autologous CD34+ cells from patients with metastatic breast cancer were exposed to a replication-incompetent retroviral vector carrying MDR-1 cDNA and then reinfused after HDCT. Immediately on recovery, patients received multiple courses of escalating dose paclitaxel. All of the 10 patients tolerated reinfusion of modified cells without any toxicity and had myeloid engraftment within 12 days (range, 11-14). The bone marrow cells of three patients contained vector MDR-1-positive cells only at the time of the first course of posttransplant paclitaxel, indicating that the MDR-1 vector-modified cells had only short-term engrafting potential. A total of 83 courses of paclitaxel were administered starting at a median of 30 (range, 21-32) days from ASCT. The median dose of paclitaxel was 225 mg/m2 and the median interval between paclitaxel cycles of therapy was 21 (range, 20-41) days. Five of the six CR patients were able to receive all of the 12 courses of paclitaxel. Three patients who had achieved less than a complete response to the HDCT (2 patients) and partial response (1 patient) were converted to complete clinical responses during the 12 cycles of paclitaxel. No delayed toxicity or bone marrow failure was noted in these patients with a median follow-up of 2 years from ASCT. This is the first study of chemotherapy immediately after transplantation with autologous CD34+ cells. These data indicate that paclitaxel can be safely administered immediately after ASCT without any delayed toxicities. Paclitaxel given immediately after ASCT can further improve the response to pretransplant chemotherapy in patients with advanced breast cancer.     

Sequencing of the alpha-synuclein gene in a large series of cases of familial Parkinson''s disease fails to reveal any further mutations. The European Consortium on Genetic Susceptibility in Parkinson''s Disease (GSPD)

PURPOSE: Tumor hypoxia may be an important factor predicting relapse following radiation therapy. This study was designed to determine the relationship between the oxygenation parameters measured using a polarographic oxygen electrode, prior to and during treatment in patients with cervix cancer, and to assess these results with regard to patient survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-three patients had pretreatment oxygen assays performed and measurements repeated following external beam radiation to a median dose of 50 Gy (range 26-52 Gy). Stage distribution showed 15 patients in Stage IB, 17 in Stage II, and 11 in Stage III. The median tumor size was 5 cm (range 3-10 cm). RESULTS: The median proportion of pO2 values <5 mm Hg (the HP5) was 41% following radiation, and the median pO2 was 12 mm Hg. These results were not significantly different from the pretreatment HP5 or pO2 of 37% and 12 mm Hg, respectively. Disease-free survival at 2 years was 50% in patients with posttreatment HP5 < or =50%, compared to 60% when posttreatment HP5 was >50% (p = 0.35). CONCLUSIONS: Unlike pretreatment results, tumour oxygenation measured following external radiation does not appear to be a useful predictive assay in patients with cervical cancer.     

Paclitaxel enhances in vitro radiosensitivity of squamous carcinoma cell lines of the head and neck

Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck is the fourth most common cancer in the United States, and therapy for very advanced cases is relatively ineffective. Paclitaxel has activity against cancers of the breast, lung, prostate, cervix, and ovary. The activity of paclitaxel for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck is less certain, and results of its radiosensitization properties have been variable. The radiation responses of two squamous carcinomas, SCC-9 (oropharynx) and HEP-2 (larynx), were examined to determine the radiosensitizing potential of paclitaxel. In vitro exposures for 24 and 48 h with paclitaxel concentrations of 10(-4) to 6 x 10(-2) microg/ml were followed by irradiation of 0.1-10 Gy. Percent survival was calculated by colony count, and the paclitaxel-radiation interaction was quantitated by the median effect principle and the combination index method of Chou and Talalay. The paclitaxel-radiation combination resulted in multiphasic interactions in both 24 and 48 h paclitaxel pretreatment in SCC-9 and HEP-2 cell lines. In general there was slight synergism [combination index (CI) <1] at low dose-low effect levels (e.g., at a paclitaxel concentration of 0.002 microg/ml or lower and radiation of 0.1-0.3 Gy), moderate antagonism (CI >1) at median dose ranges and strong synergism (CI <1) at high dose ranges (e.g., at a paclitaxel concentration of 0.012-0.06 microg/ml and radiation doses of 3-10 Gy), especially at a surviving fraction of <0.1, which is therapeutically relevant. The median effect principle and combination index method provided a simple way to quantitate the synergism or antagonism of a paclitaxel-radiation interaction under various conditions. This analysis demonstrated that paclitaxel-radiation synergy exists at doses that are readily achievable in the clinical scenario for both agents and that greater synergy occurred at high dose-high effect levels. These results suggest that the combination of both therapies should be explored further in clinical trials assessing the treatment of squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck.     

Use of a general surgical high dependency unit in a district general hospital: the first 10 years

The chemotherapy regimen of paclitaxel and carboplatin produces an objective response in 30%-60% of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In a prospective study, we administered paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 (by 1-3-hr infusion) and carboplatin at an area under the plasma concentration curve (AUC) of 5 (by the Calvert formula) every 3 weeks to 21 patients who had previously received predominantly platinum-based chemotherapy for NSCLC. We observed no objective responses. Patients received a median of 2 cycles before disease progression. Three of 5 patients who had received only single-agent treatment with a relatively inactive agent may have had modest clinical benefit. We conclude that the paclitaxel/carboplatin regimen has minimal activity in previously treated patients with NSCLC.     

Cycles of dose-intensive chemotherapy with peripheral stem cell support in persistent or recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to determine the toxicity and surgically documented response rate of sequential high-dose chemotherapy with peripheral stem cell support in patients with persistent or recurrent cisplatin-sensitive ovarian cancer. METHODS: Fourteen patients (average age, 45 years) were treated with cyclophosphamide (4.5 g/m2), followed by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-stimulated peripheral stem cell harvests. The subsequent regimen prescribed three courses of carboplatin (1 g/m2) and cyclophosphamide (1.5 g/m2 with 2-mercaptoethanesulfonate) every 2 weeks with stem cell support. This was followed by three courses of paclitaxel at 250 mg/m2 every 2 weeks with G-CSF support only. Six patients were entered on the basis of a positive second-look laparotomy and 8 patients had a first recurrence after at least a 6-month disease-free interval. RESULTS: Fourteen patients were entered and 12 patients completed all planned courses of therapy (mean time, 13 weeks). Normal hematopoiesis was reestablished after each cycle. Hospitalization for neutropenic fever occurred in 11/93 cycles (11.8%). Thirteen patients required blood transfusions and in 12 patients platelet transfusions were given. One patient had grade 3 neurotoxicity. An initial elevated CA 125 returned to normal in 7/8 patients (88%) and 71% of patients with measurable disease responded to therapy. There were 2 pathologic complete responders (PCR), making the PCR rate 2/14 or 14% (0-35%). CONCLUSION: Although this regimen was well tolerated and clinical response rates were high, the surgically documented response rate was not clearly superior to conventional salvage regimens in platinum-sensitive patients.