Linear low‐density polyethylene/(soya powder) blends containing polyethylene‐g‐(maleic anhydride) as a compatibilizer

Blends were made from linear low‐density polyethylene (LLDPE) and various amounts of soya powder. The soya powder content was varied from 5 to 20 wt%. Polyethylene‐g‐(maleic anhydride) (PE‐g‐MA) was used as a compatibilizer. Tensile strength and elongation at break (EB) decreased with increasing soya powder content. However, Young's modulus increased with the incorporation of soya powder. The addition of PE‐g‐MA as a compatibilizer increased the tensile strength, EB, and modulus of the blends. The interfacial adhesion between soya powder and LLDPE was improved by the incorporation of PE‐g‐MA, as demonstrated by scanning electron microscopy. Increasing the content of soya powder reduced the crystallinity of the LLDPE phase. The addition of PE‐g‐MA had no significant effect on melting temperature, but the degree of crystallinity of the LLDPE was increased. The thermal stability of the blends was determined by using thermogravimetric analysis. Thermal stability decreased with increasing soya powder loading. However, the addition of PE‐g‐MA slightly increased the thermal stability of LLDPE/(soya powder) blends. J. VINYL ADDIT. TECHNOL., 2009. © 2009 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Toughening and compatibilization of polypropylene/polyamide‐6 blends with a maleated–grafted ethylene‐co‐vinyl acetate

In this article, maleated–grafted ethylene‐co‐vinyl acetate (EVA‐g‐MA) was used as the interfacial modifier for polypropylene/polyamide‐6 (PP/PA6) blends, and effects of its concentration on the mechanical properties and the morphology of blends were investigated. It was found that the addition of EVA‐g‐MA improved the compatibility between PP and PA6 and resulted in a finer dispersion of dispersed PA6 phase. In comparison with uncompatibilized PP/PA6 blend, a significant reduction in the size of dispersed PA6 domain was observed. Toluene‐etched micrographs confirmed the formation of interfacial copolymers. Mechanical measurement revealed that the addition of EVA‐g‐MA markedly improved the impact toughness of PP/PA6 blend. Fractograph micrographs revealed that matrix shear yielding began to occur when EVA‐g‐MA concentration was increased upto 18 wt %. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 99:3300–3307, 2006     

Blends of poly(2,6‐dimethyl‐1,4‐phenylene oxide)/polyamide 6 toughened by maleated polystyrene‐based copolymers: Mechanical properties,morphology, and rheology

Poly(2,6‐dimethyl‐1,4‐phenylene oxide)/polyamide 6 (PPO/PA6 30/70) blends were impact modified by addition of three kinds of maleated polystyrene‐based copolymers, i.e., maleated styrene‐ethylene‐butylene‐styrene copolymer (SEBS‐g‐MA), maleated methyl methacrylate‐butadiene‐styrene copolymer (MBS‐g‐MA), and maleated acrylonitrile‐butadiene‐styrene copolymer (ABS‐g‐MA). The mechanical properties, morphology and rheological behavior of the impact modified PPO/PA6 blends were investigated. The selective location of the maleated copolymers in one phase or at interface accounted for the different toughening effects of the maleated copolymer, which is closely related to their molecular structure and composition. SEBS‐g‐MA was uniformly dispersed in PPO phase and greatly toughened PPO/PA6 blends even at low temperature. MBS‐g‐MA particles were mainly dispersed in the PA6 phase and around the PPO phase, resulting in a significant enhancement of the notched Izod impact strength of PPO/PA6 blends from 45 J/m to 281 J/m at the MBS‐g‐MA content of 20 phr. In comparison, the ABS‐g‐MA was mainly dispersed in PA6 phase without much influencing the original mechanical properties of the PPO/PA6 blend. The different molecule structure and selective location of the maleated copolymers in the blends were reflected by the change of rheological behavior as well. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2010     

Phase structure and properties of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/high‐density polyethylene based on recycled materials

Blends based on recycled high density polyethylene (R‐HDPE) and recycled poly(ethylene terephthalate) (R‐PET) were made through reactive extrusion. The effects of maleated polyethylene (PE‐g‐MA), triblock copolymer of styrene and ethylene/butylene (SEBS), and 4,4′‐methylenedi(phenyl isocyanate) (MDI) on blend properties were studied. The 2% PE‐g‐MA improved the compatibility of R‐HDPE and R‐PET in all blends toughened by SEBS. For the R‐HDPE/R‐PET (70/30 w/w) blend toughened by SEBS, the dispersed PET domain size was significantly reduced with use of 2% PE‐g‐MA, and the impact strength of the resultant blend doubled. For blends with R‐PET matrix, all strengths were improved by adding MDI through extending the PET molecular chains. The crystalline behaviors of R‐HDPE and R‐PET in one‐phase rich systems influenced each other. The addition of PE‐g‐MA and SEBS consistently reduced the crystalline level (χ_c) of either the R‐PET or the R‐HDPE phase and lowered the crystallization peak temperature (T_c) of R‐PET. Further addition of MDI did not influence R‐HDPE crystallization behavior but lowered the χ_c of R‐PET in R‐PET rich blends. The thermal stability of R‐HDPE/R‐PET 70/30 and 50/50 (w/w) blends were improved by chain‐extension when 0.5% MDI was added. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2009     

Polyethylene grafted maleic anhydride to improve wettability of liquid on polyethylene films

Blends of linear low density polyethylene (LLDPE) and LLDPE grafted maleic anhydride (LLDPE‐g‐MA) were prepared by melt mixing. The surface of cast films with different contents and types of maleated PE were characterized through contact angle and wetting tension measurements, as well as attenuated total reflection IR spectroscopy. The tensile properties and light transmission of extruded films, as well as the performance of these films compared with commercial “antifog” films, for greenhouses were determined. The carbonyl polar groups on the surface of LLDPE/LLDPE‐g‐MA blends increased, and the equilibrium contact angles of water and dimethylformamide decreased when the content of maleated PE increased. Films made with these blends showed a noticeable reduction in water drop formation as the MA content was increased and when using LLDPE‐g‐MA of lower molecular weight. The light transmission through these films under condensation was improved when using increased contents of MA, which promotes better wetting of the water on the surface. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 79: 1802–1808, 2001     

Influence of compatibilizer precursor structure on the phase distribution of low density poly(ethylene) in a poly(ethylene terephthalate) matrix

In attempt to enhance the compatibility of PET/LDPE blends by using a proper functionalized polymer as third component, diethyl maleate (DEM)‐functionalized ultralow density poly(ethylene) (ULDPE‐g‐DEM) and styrene‐b‐(ethylene‐co‐1‐butene)‐b‐styrene triblock copolymer (SEBS‐g‐DEM) were prepared by radical functionalization in the melt. Immiscible PET/LDPE blends having compositions of 70/30 and 80/20 by weight were then extruded in the presence of 1–10% by weight of ULDPE‐g‐DEM and SEBS‐g‐DEM as compatibilizer precursors and ZnO (0.3% by weight) as transesterification catalyst. In both cases, evidences about the occurring of compatibilization between the two immiscible phases, thanks to the studied reactive processes, were obtained. Moreover, the phase distribution and particle size of blends were deeply investigated. Completely different kinds of phase morphology were achieved, as ULDPE‐g‐DEM stabilized a dispersed phase morphology, whereas SEBS‐g‐DEM favored the development of a cocontinuous phase morphology. The observed differences are tentatively explained onthe basis of reactivity and physical features of polymers. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2008. © 2008 Society of Plastics Engineers.     

An investigation on recycled PET/PP and recycled PET/PP‐EP compatibilized blends: Rheological,morphological, and mechanical properties

The effectiveness of P(E‐co‐MA‐co‐GMA) as a compatibilizer for recycled PET/PP and recycled PET/PP‐EP (polypropylene (ethylene‐propylene) heterophase copolymer) blends was investigated by means of morphological (scanning electron microscopy), rheological (small amplitude oscillatory shear), mechanical (tensile, flexural and impact tests), and thermal (differential scanning calorimetry) properties. Compatibilizer concentration ranged from 1 to 5 wt % with respect to the whole blend. All blends were obtained in a 90/10 composition using a twin screw extruder. Compatibilization effects for PETr/PP‐EP were more pronounced due to ethylene segments present in both PP‐EP and P(E‐co‐EA‐co‐GMA). PETr/PP‐EP has shown greater dispersed phase size reduction, a more solid‐like complex viscosity behavior and larger storage modulus at low frequencies in relation to PETr/PP blend. For both investigated blends, mechanical properties indicated an improvement in both elongation at break and impact strength with increasing compatibilizer content. PETr/PP‐EP blends showed improved performance for the same level of compatibilizer content. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015 , 132, 41892.     

Effect of the compatibilization of linear low‐density polyethylene‐g‐acrylic acid on the morphology and mechanical properties of poly(butylene terephthalate)/linear low‐density polyethylene blends

A poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT)/linear low‐density polyethylene (LLDPE) alloy was prepared with a reactive extrusion method. For improved compatibility of the blending system, LLDPE grafted with acrylic acid (LLDPE‐g‐AA) by radiation was adopted in place of plain LLDPE. The toughness and extensibility of the PBT/LLDPE‐g‐AA blends, as characterized by the impact strengths and elongations at break, were much improved in comparison with the toughness and extensibility of the PBT/LLDPE blends at the same compositions. However, there was not much difference in their tensile (or flexural) strengths and moduli. Scanning electron microscopy photographs showed that the domains of PBT/LLDPE‐g‐AA were much smaller and their dispersions were more homogeneous than the domains and dispersions of the PBT/LLDPE blends. Compared with the related values of the PBT/LLDPE blends, the contents and melting temperatures of the usual spherulites of PBT in PBT/LLDPE‐g‐AA decreased. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 84: 1059–1066, 2002; DOI 10.1002/app.10399     

Influence of epoxy resin on the properties of maleic anhydride functionalized acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene copolymer toughened polyamide 6 blends

Maleic anhydride functionalized acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene copolymer (ABS‐g‐MA) was used as an impact modifier of polyamide 6 (PA6). Epoxy resin was introduced into PA6/ABS‐g‐MA blends to further improve their properties. Notched Izod impact tests showed that the impact strength of PA6/ABS‐g‐MA could be improved from 253 to 800 J/m with the addition of epoxy resin when the ABS‐g‐MA content was set at 25 wt %. Differential scanning calorimetry results showed that the addition of epoxy resin made the crystallization temperature and melting temperature shift to lower temperatures; this indicated the decrease in the PA6 crystallization ability. Dynamic mechanical analysis testing showed that the addition of epoxy resin induced the glass‐transition temperature of PA6 and the styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile copolymer phase to shift to higher temperatures due to the chemical reactions between PA6, ABS‐g‐MA, and epoxy resin. The scanning electron microscopy results indicated that the ABS‐g‐MA copolymer dispersed into the PA6 matrix uniformly and that the phase morphology of the PA6/ABS‐g‐MA blends did not change with the addition of the epoxy resin. Transmission electron microscopy showed that the epoxy resin did not change the deformation mechanisms of the PA6/ABS‐g‐MA blends. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011     

Effects of maleated styrene–(ethylene‐co‐butene)–styrene on the morphology and mechanical and thermal properties of polystyrene/polyamide 1212 blends

Polystyrene (PS)/polyamide 1212 (PA 1212) blends were compatibilized with a maleated triblock copolymer of styrene–(ethylene‐co‐butene)–styrene (SEBS‐g‐MA). Scanning electron microscopy revealed that the addition of SEBS‐g‐MA was beneficial to the dispersion of PA 1212 in the PS matrix because of the reaction between them. The variation of the fraction of SEBS‐g‐MA in the blends allowed the manipulation of the phase structure, which first formed a sheetlike structure and then formed a cocontinuous phase containing PA 1212/SEBS‐g‐MA core–shell morphologies. As a result, the mechanical properties, especially the Charpy notched impact resistance, were significantly improved with the addition of SEBS‐g‐MA. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) data indicated that the strong interaction between SEBS‐g‐MA and PA 1212 in the blends retarded the crystallization of PA 1212. The heat distortion temperature of the compatibilized blends was improved in comparison with that of the unmodified blend, probably because of the apparent increase in the glass‐transition temperature with an increasing concentration of SEBS‐g‐MA. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 95: 1354–1360, 2005     

Studies on blends of LLDPE and polar polymers compatibilized by a random copolymer

Compatibilization of blends of linear low‐density polyethylene (LLDPE)–poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and LLDPE–copolymer of methyl methacrylate (MMA) and 4‐vinylpyridine (poly(MMA‐co‐4VP) with poly(ethylene‐co‐methacrylic acid) (EMAA) have been studied. Mechanical properties of the LLDPE–PMMA blends increase upon addition of EMAA. In order to further improve interfacial adhesion of LLDPE and PMMA, 4‐vinyl pyridine units are introduced into PMMA chains, or poly(MMA‐co‐4VP) is used as the polar polymer. In LLDPE–poly(MMA‐co‐4VP)–EMAA blends, interaction of MAA in EMAA with 4VP of poly(MMA‐co‐4VP) causes a band shift in the infrared (IR) spectra. Chemical shifts of N_1s binding energy in X‐ray photoelectronic spectroscopy (XPS) experiments indicate a transfer of proton from MAA to 4VP. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) pictures show that the morphology of the blends were improved upon addition of EMAA. Nonradiative energy transfer (NRET) fluorescence results attest that there exists interdiffusion of chromophore‐labeled LLDPE chains and chromophore‐labeled poly(MMA‐co‐4VP) chains in the interface. Based on experimental results, the mechanism of compatibilization is studied in detail. Compatibilization is realized through the interaction between MAA in EMAA with 4VP in poly(MMA‐co‐4VP). © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 71: 967–973, 1999     

Poly(ethylene‐co‐methacrylic acid)–lithium ionomer as a compatibilizer for poly(ethylene terephthalate)/linear low‐density polyethylene blends

Poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET)/linear low‐density polyethylene (LLDPE) blends (75/25), with contents of poly(ethylene‐co‐methacrylic acid) partially neutralized with lithium (PEMA–Li) that were systematically changed from 0 to 45% relative to the LLDPE, were obtained by direct injection molding in an attempt to (1) ameliorate the performance of the binary blend and (2) find the best compatibilizer content. PEMA–Li did not modify the PET or LLDPE amorphous‐phase compositions or the crystalline content of PET. However, PEMA–Li did lead to a nucleation effect and to the presence of a second smaller and less perfect crystalline structure. PET induced a fractional crystallization in LLDPE that remained in the presence of PEMA–Li and reduced the crystallinity of LLDPE. The ternary blends showed two similar dispersed LLDPE and PEMA–Li phases with small subparticles, probably PET, inside. The compatibilizing effect of PEMA–Li was clearly shown by the impressive increase in the break strain, along with only small decreases in the modulus of elasticity and in the tensile strength. With respect to the recycling possibilities of LLDPE, a ternary blend with the addition of 22.5% PEMA–Li, which led to very slight modulus and yield stress decreases with respect to the binary blend and a break strain increase of 480%, appeared to be the most attractive. However, the highest property improvement appeared with the addition of 37.5% PEMA–Li, which led to elasticity modulus and tensile strength decreases of only 9%, along with a very high break strain increase (760%). © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 87: 1322–1328, 2003     

Effects of fillers,maleated ethylene propylene diene diene rubber,and maleated ethylene octene copolymer on phase morphology and oil resistance in natural rubber/nitrile rubber blends

The phase morphology and oil resistance of 20/80 NR/NBR blends filled with different types of fillers and copolymers were investigated. In the case of filler effect, N220, N330, and N660 carbon blacks with different particle sizes were used. Additionally, the blends filled with nonblack‐reinforcing fillers, that is, precipitated and silane‐treated silica, were investigated. To study the compatibilization effect, maleated ethylene propylene diene rubber (EPDM‐g‐MA) and maleated ethylene octene copolymer (EOR‐g‐MA) were added to the blends. The results revealed that the addition of filler, either carbon black or silica, to the blend caused a drastic decrease in NR dispersed phase size. Carbon blacks with different particle sizes did not produce any significant difference in NR dispersed phase size under the optical microscope. Silica‐filled blends showed lower resistance to oil than did the carbon black–filled blends. In addition, it was determined that neither EOR‐g‐MA nor EPDM‐g‐MA could act as a compatibilizer for the blend system studied. The oil resistance of the blends with EPDM‐g‐MA is strongly affected by the overall polarity of the blend. In the case of EOR‐g‐MA, the oil resistance of the blends is significantly governed by both overall polarity of the blend and phase morphology. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 89: 1156–1162, 2003     

Linear low‐density polyethylene/poly(ethylene terephthalate) blends compatibilization prepared by an eccentric rotor extruder: A morphology,mechanical, thermal,and rheological study

In this study, various poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) and linear low‐density polyethylene (LLDPE) with maleic anhydride‐grafted LLDPE (LLDPE‐g‐MAH) compatibilizer were melt blended under an elongational flow. A novel extrusion device, eccentric rotor extruder (ERE), was developed to supply such flow during the process. Including morphology, mechanical properties, melting behavior, and rheological behavior were studied. The morphological study showed that the compatibility between LLDPE and PET was greatly improved with LLDPE loading up to 80 wt %. Mechanical tests indicated that LLDPE could toughen PET to some extent. Moreover, a comparison of samples prepared between ERE and conventional extruder was made and demonstrated the sample prepared by ERE can exhibit better mechanical properties. Differential scanning calorimetry results revealed that PET can promote the crystallinity of LLDPE. Rheological behavior indicated that the complex viscosity of the blends exhibited strong shear thinning phenomenon with increasing LLDPE content, particularly in high‐frequency range blend with the LLDPE weight ratio of 80 wt % was more sensitivity to shear rate than neat LLDPE. The G′‐G″ curves of the blends also revealed that the microstructure of the blends changed significantly with the addition of LLDPE which was consistent with the scanning electron micrographs that PET particles became smaller and distributed more uniform with increasing LLDPE content. Furthermore, the blends showed similar stress relaxation mechanism with adding LLDPE content from 60 to 100 wt %. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2018 , 135, 46489.     

In situ compatibilization of maleated thermoplastic starch/polyester melt‐blends by reactive extrusion

This article concerns the utilization of maleated thermoplastic starch (MTPS) in the reactive extrusion melt‐blending with poly(butylene adipate‐co‐terephthalate) (PBAT) in blown film applications. First, MTPS was prepared from cornstarch with glycerol (plasticizer) and maleic anhydride (MA; esterification agent). MTPS was then melt‐blended with PBAT in a subsequent downstream extrusion operation. The effects of both polyester and MA contents were studied on the physicochemical parameters of melt‐blends. For high polyester fractions (>60 wt%), PBAT‐g‐MTPS graft copolymers were obtained through transesterification reactions. They were promoted by the MA‐derived acidic moieties grafted onto the starch backbone as shown by selective Soxhlet extraction experiments and FTIR analyses. At lower polyester content, no significant reaction occurred more likely due to an inversion in the phase morphology between both components. Tensile properties of PBAT‐g‐MTPS graft copolymer containing 70 wt% polyester were much higher as the TPS/PBAT melt‐blend modified with MA. This can be explained by a finer morphology of the dispersed phase in the continuous PBAT matrix, and an increased interfacial area for the grafting reaction as attested by morphological studies. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2008. © 2008 Society of Plastics Engineers.     

Effects of maleated syndiotactic polystyrene on the morphology,mechanical properties,and crystallization behavior of syndiotactic polystyrene/polyamide 6 blends

The compatibilization of syndiotactic polystyrene (sPS)/polyamide 6 (PA‐6) blends with maleic anhydride grafted syndiotactic polystyrene (sPS‐g‐MA) as a reactive compatibilizer was investigated. The sPS/PA‐6 blends were in situ compatibilized by a reaction between the maleic anhydride (MA) of sPS‐g‐MA and the amine end group of PA‐6. The occurrence of the chemical reaction was substantiated by the disappearance of a characteristic MA peak from the Fourier transform infrared spectrum. Morphology observations showed that the size of the dispersed PA‐6 domains was significantly reduced and that the interfacial adhesion was much improved by the addition of sPS‐g‐MA. As a result of reactive compatibilization, the impact strengths of the sPS/PA‐6 blends increased with an increase in the sPS‐g‐MA content. The crystallization behaviors of the blends were affected by the compatibilization effect of sPS‐g‐MA. A single melting peak of sPS in the noncompatibilized blend was gradually split into two peaks as the amount of the compatibilizer increased. A single crystallization peak of PA‐6 in the noncompatibilized blend became two peaks with the addition of 3 wt % sPS‐g‐MA. The new peak was a result of the fractionation crystallization. As the amount of sPS‐g‐MA increased, the intensity of the new peak increased, and the original peak nearly disappeared. Finally, the crystallization peak of PA‐6 disappeared with 20 wt % sPS‐g‐MA in the blend. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 89: 2502–2506, 2003     

Poly(ethylene terephthalate)/polypropylene reactive blends through isocyanate functional group

To evaluate the compatibilization effects of an isocyanate group on poly(ethylene terephthalate)/polypropylene (PET/PP) blends through a reactive blend, PP grafted with 2‐hydroxyethyl methacrylate‐isophorone diisocyanate (PP‐g‐HI) was prepared and blended with PET. In view of the blend morphology, the presence of PP‐g‐HI reduced the particle size of the dispersed phase by the reduced interfacial tension between the PP and PET phases, indicating the in situ copolymer (PP‐g‐PET) generated during the melt blending. The DSC thermograms for the cooling run indicated that the PET crystallization in the PP‐g‐HI rich phase was affected by the chemical reactions of PET and PP‐g‐HI. The improved mechanical properties for the PET/PP‐g‐HI blends were shown in the measurement of the tensile and flexural properties. In addition, the water absorption test indicated that the PET/PP‐g‐HI blend was more effective than the PET/PP blend in improving the water resistance of PET. The positive properties of PET/PP‐g‐HI blends stemmed from the improved compatibilization of the PET/PP blend. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 81: 1056–1062, 2001     

Toughening of polyamide 11 via addition of crystallizable polyethylene derivatives

BACKGROUND: Conventional rubber‐like toughening modifiers are soft and amorphous, and when used to toughen polyamide 11 (PA11) they commonly induce a decrease in the tensile strength and modulus. In this study, crystallizable polyethylene (PE) derivatives, i.e. linear low‐density polyethylene (LLDPE) and maleic anhydride‐grafted polyethylene (PE‐g‐MA), were adopted to toughen PA11. RESULTS: Compared to pure PA11, a highest improvement by a factor of eight in the impact toughness was achieved; also, the tensile strength and modulus could be maintained at a relatively high level. PE‐g‐MA acted as a compatibilizer for PA11 and LLDPE, bringing strong interfacial adherence, and especially a domain‐in‐domain morphology observed in PA11/PE‐g‐MA/LLDPE (70/10/20 by weight) blends. The observation that PA11 was toughened by the crystallizable PE derivatives is discussed in depth, based on the combined effect of surface crystallization of LLDPE on pre‐formed PA11 crystallites and interfacial compatiblization between PA11 and PE‐g‐MA. CONCLUSION: The crystallizable PE derivatives LLDPE and PE‐g‐MA were shown to be effective toughening modifiers for the proportions PA11/PE‐g‐MA/LLDPE 70/10/20 (by weight), which is considered to be an optimum composition: special domain‐in‐domain morphology was observed indicating a good dispersion of PE in the PA11 matrix and strong interfacial adherence between PE phase and PA11 phase. The reason why strength and modulus were maintained at a high level in the as‐prepared blends was attributed to the existence of rigid crystalline domains in PE. Copyright © 2009 Society of Chemical Industry     

Effects of maleated styrene–(ethylene‐co‐butene)–styrene on compatibilization and properties of nylon‐12,12/nylon‐6 blends

Effects of a maleated triblock copolymer of styrene–(ethylene‐co‐butene)–styrene (SEBS‐g‐MA) on compatibilization and mechanical properties of nylon‐12,12/nylon‐6 blends were investigated. The results showed that addition of SEBS‐g‐MA could improve the compatibility between nylon‐12,12 and nylon‐6. Nylon‐12,12 could disperse very well in nylon‐6 matrix, although the dispersion of nylon‐6 was poor when nylon‐6 was the dispersed phase. At a fixed nylon‐12,12/nylon‐6 ratio of 30/70, supertoughness was achieved with addition of 15% SEBS‐g‐MA in weight. Scanning electron microscopy of the impact‐fractured surface indicated that cavitation and matrix shear yielding were the predominant mechanisms of impact energy dissipation. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 93: 1446–1453, 2004     

Blends of polyamide1010 with unmodified and maleic‐anhydride‐grafted high‐impact polystyrene

The crystallization behaviors, dynamic mechanical properties, tensile, and morphology features of polyamide1010 (PA1010) blends with the high‐impact polystyrene (HIPS) were examined at a wide composition range. Both unmodified and maleic‐anhydride‐(MA)‐grafted HIPS (HIPS‐g‐MA) were used. It was found that the domain size of HIPS‐g‐MA was much smaller than that of HIPS at the same compositions in the blends. The mechanical performances of PA1010–HIPS‐g‐MA blends were enhanced much more than that of PA1010–HIPS blends. The crystallization temperature of PA1010 shifted towards higher temperature as HIPS‐g‐MA increased from 20 to 50% in the blends. For the blends with a dispersed PA phase (≤35 wt %), the T_c of PA1010 shifted towards lower temperature, from 178 to 83°C. An additional transition was detected at a temperature located between the T_g's of PA1010 and PS. It was associated with the interphase relaxation peak. Its intensity increased with increasing content of PA1010, and the maximum occurred at the composition of PA1010–HIPS‐g‐MA 80/20. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 74: 857–865, 1999