Solution properties of hyperbranched polymers and synthetic application for amphiphilic star‐hyperbranched copolymers by grafting from hyperbranched macroinitiator

Hyperbranched polystyrenes (PS) were prepared by living radical photopolymerization of N,N‐diethyldithiocarbamoylmethylstyrene (DTCS) as an inimer under UV irradiation. Branched PS with an average chain length between branching points of four styrene units was also prepared by living radical copolymerization of DTCS with styrene. The ratio of radius of gyration to hydrodynamic radius R_G/R_H for these hyperbranched polymers was in the range 0.82–0.89 in toluene. The translational diffusion coefficient D(C) showed a constant value in the range of 0–14 × 10^?3 g ml^?1 in toluene. It was found from these dilute solution properties that hyperbranched PSs formed a unimolecular structure even in a good solvent because of their compact nature. These hyperbranched PSs exhibited large amounts of photofunctional carbamate (DC) groups on their outside surfaces. Subsequently, we derived amphiphilic star‐hyperbranched copolymers by grafting from hyperbranched macroinitiator with 1‐vinyl‐2‐pyrrolidinone. These star‐hyperbranched copolymers were soluble in water and methanol. © 2001 Society of Chemical Industry     

Synthesis and properties of amphiphilic star block copolymers with star macroinitiators based on a one‐pot approach

Previously, star polystyrenes (PSs) have been prepared by atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) of N‐[2‐(2‐bromoisobutyryloxy)ethyl]maleimide (BiBEMI) with a large excess of styrene (St) in one pot. But linear PSs were also present during the formation of the star polymers. In the work reported here, we found that control of the formation of star polymers using a one‐pot approach can be improved by using a two‐step process. The polymerization was conducted first at a low temperature to form multifunctional cores by copolymerization of BiBEMI and St. Second, on increasing the temperature, homopolymerization of St occurred to grow PS arms. Then a series of amphiphilic star polystyrene‐block‐poly(acrylic acid)s, (S₁₄A_x)₁₆, were prepared by ATRP of tert‐butyl acrylate with the star PSs as macroinitiators, followed by selective acidolysis of the poly(tert‐butyl acrylate) blocks. Their micellization was studied using dynamic light scattering, which suggested that (S₁₄A₁₁₂)₁₆ amphiphilic star block copolymers could form unimolecular micelles in a basic aqueous solution. Then pyrene molecules were encapsulated using the (S₁₄A₁₁₂)₁₆ amphiphilic star copolymers and the loading capacity was investigated with UV and fluorescence spectroscopy. © 2013 Society of Chemical Industry     

Synthesis of cyclohexanone formaldehyde resin‐methylmethacrylate block‐graft copolymers via ATRP

Well defined block‐graft copolymers of cyclohexanone‐formaldehyde resin (CFR) and methylmethacrylate (MMA) were prepared via atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP). In the first step, cyclohexanone formaldehyde resin (CFR) containing hydroxyl groups were modified with 2‐bromopropionyl bromide. Resulting multifunctional macroinitiator was used in the ATRP of MMA using copper bromide (CuBr) and N,N,N′,N″,N″‐pentamethyl‐diethylenetriamine (PMDETA) as catalyst system at 90°C. The chemical composition and structure of the copolymers were characterized by nuclear magnetic resonance (¹H‐NMR) spectroscopy, Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, and molecular weight measurement. Molecular weight distributions of the CFR graft copolymers were measured by gel permeation chromatography (GPC). M_n values up to 19,000 associated with narrow molecular weight distributions (polydispersity index (PDI) < 1.6) were obtained with conversions up to 49%. Coating properties of synthesized graft copolymers such as adhesion and gloss values were measured. They exhibited good adhesion properties on Plexiglas substrate. The thermal behaviors of all polymers were conducted using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2012     

Hyperbranched homo and thermoresponsive graft copolymers by using ATRP‐macromonomer initiators

Macromonomer initiators behave as macro cross‐linkers, macro initiators, and macromonomers to obtain branched and cross‐linked block/graft copolymers. A series of new macromonomer initiators for atom transfer radical polymerization (MIM‐ATRP) based on polyethylene glycol (M_n = 495D, 2203D, and 4203D) (PEG) were synthesized by the reaction of the hydroxyl end of mono‐methacryloyl polyethylene glycol with 2‐bromo propanoyl chloride, leading to methacryloyl polyethylene glycol 2‐bromo propanoyl ester. Poly (ethylene glycol) functionalized with methacrylate at one end was reacted with 2‐bromopropionyl chloride to form a macromonomeric initiator for ATRP. ATRP was found to be a more controllable polymerization method than conventional free radical polymerization in view of fewer cross‐linked polymers and highly branched polymers produced from macromonomer initiators as well. In another scenario, ATRP of N‐isopropylacrylamide (NIPAM) was initiated by MIM‐ATRP to obtain PEG‐b‐PNIPAM branched block/graft copolymers. Thermal analysis, FTIR, ¹H NMR, TEM, and SEM techniques were used in the characterization of the products. They had a thermo‐responsive character and exhibited volume phase transition at ～ 36°C. A plasticizer effect of PEG in graft copolymers was also observed, indicating a lower glass transition temperature than that of pure PNIPAM. Homo and copolymerization kinetics were also evaluated. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2012     

Synthesis of multi‐arm star polystyrene with hyperbranched polyester initiators by atom transfer radical polymerization

Multi‐arm star polystyrenes with hyperbranched polyester (HP3) core were prepared by atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP). The structures of the polymers were investigated with FTIR and ¹H NMR. GPC results showed that the resultant polymers had relatively broad polydispersity indices that arouse from the macromolecular initiator (HP3‐Br). The thermal properties were studied using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). DSC analysis indicated that polystyrene star polymers had only the glass transition temperatures (T_g), which changes with the weight ratio of multi‐functional macroinitiator‐to‐monomer. In addition, these star polymers could form the spherical micelles in the selected solvent (THF/n‐hexane). © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 99: 728–733, 2006     

Synthesis of poly(paraphenylene vinylene)—polystyrene‐based rod‐coil block copolymer by atom transfer radical polymerization: Toward a self‐organized lamellar semiconducting material

Atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) was used as a versatile route to well‐defined poly(diethylhexyl‐p‐phenylenevinylene‐b‐styrene) (PPV‐b‐PS) semiconducting block copolymers. For this purpose, original conjugated macroinitiators were synthesized from DEH‐PPV and further used for the copolymerization reaction. The microphase‐separated morphologies obtained with the semiconducting PPV‐b‐PS block copolymer fulfill the basic structural requirements required to build efficient organic photovoltaic devices. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Synthesis and characterization of Pst‐b‐PDMS‐b‐PSt copolymers by atom transfer radical polymerization

Polystyrene‐b‐poly(dimethylsiloxane)‐b‐polystyrene (Pst‐b‐PDMS‐b‐PSt) triblock copolymers were synthesized by atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP). Commercially available difunctional PDMS containing vinylsilyl terminal species was reacted with hydrogen bromide, resulting in the PDMS macroinitiators for the ATRP of styrene (St). The latter procedure was carried out at 130°C in a phenyl ether solution with CuCl and 4, 4′‐di (5‐nonyl)‐2,2′‐bipyridine (dNbpy) as the catalyzing system. By using this technique, triblock copolymers consisting of a PDMS center block and polystyrene terminal blocks were synthesized. The polymerization was controllable; ATRP of St from those macroinitiators showed linear increases in M_n with conversion. The block copolymers were characterized with IR and ¹H‐NMR. The effects of molecular weight of macroinitiators, macroinitiator concentration, catalyst concentration, and temperature on the polymerization were also investigated. Thermodynamic data and activation parameters for the ATRP are reported. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 92: 3764–3770, 2004     

Synthesis and characterization of PBMA‐b‐PDMS‐b‐PBMA copolymers by atom transfer radical polymerization

Poly(butyl methylacrylate)–b–poly(dimethylsiloxane)–b–poly(butyl methylacrylate) (PBMA–b–PDMS–b–PBMA) triblock copolymers were synthesized by atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP). The reaction of α,ω‐dichloride PDMS with 2′‐hydroxyethyl‐2‐bromo‐2‐methylpropanoate gave suitable macroinitiators for the ATRP of BMA. The latter procedure was carried out at 110°C in a phenyl ether solution with CuCl and 4,4′‐di (5‐nonyl)‐2,2′‐bipyridine (dNbpy) as the catalyzing system. The polymerization was controllable, with the increase of the monomer conversion, there was a nearly linear increase of molecular weight and a decrease of polydispersity in the process of the polymerization, and the rate of the polymerization was first‐order with respect to monomer conversion. The block copolymers were characterized with IR and ¹H‐NMR and differential scanning calorimetry. The effects of macroinitiator concentration, catalyst concentration, and temperature on the polymerization were also investigated. Thermodynamic data and activation parameters for the ATRP were reported. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 92: 532–538, 2004     

Preparation and morphology of amphiphilic polystyrene–poly (2‐vinylpyridine) heteroarm star copolymers prepared by ATRP

BACKGROUND: The self‐assembly of amphiphilic copolymers has been demonstrated to be a powerful route towards supramolecular objects with novel architectures, functions and physical properties. In this study, the synthesis and morphology of amphiphilic linear polystyrene (PS)‐block‐poly(2‐vinylpyridine) (P2VP) and heteroarm star PS‐star‐P2VP copolymers are studied. The dispersion of silver nanoparticles with the prepared PS‐block‐P2VP and PS‐star‐P2VP copolymers is also discussed. RESULTS: Amphiphilic copolymers with different P2VP chain lengths were successfully synthesized using atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP). The copolymers prepared had low polydispersity indices. Various aggregate morphologies, including spheres, vesicles, rods, large compound micelles, two‐dimensional ring‐like and three‐dimensional hollow structures, were formed by varying the hydrophilic coil length and the selective solvent content. Silver nanoparticles showed good dispersion behavior in both types of copolymers. CONCLUSION: Based on this study, it will be possible to prepare metal/copolymer nanocomposites by direct mixing. Further, the PS‐block‐P2VP and PS‐star‐P2VP copolymers prepared can be used in the preparation of nanoporous films as templates and nanoparticles as nanoreactors. They can also be applied in terms of oil recovery, paints and cosmetics formulations, as well as in pharmaceutical and medical applications as rheological agents. Copyright © 2008 Society of Chemical Industry     

Graft copolymers and high‐molecular‐weight star‐like polymers by atom transfer radical polymerization

Grafting of tert‐butyl acrylate (tBuA), methyl methacrylate (MMA), and styrene (St) monomers (M) by Cu(I)‐mediated ATRP from polystyrene (PSt) macroinitiator (M_n = 5620, polydispersity index, PDI = 1.12), containing initiating 2‐bromopropionyloxy groups (I) (bound to 34% of aromatic cores; 11 groups per backbone), was performed using conditions suitable for the respective homopolymerizations. The preparation of PSt‐g‐PtBuA in bulk using an initial molar ratio [M]₀/[I]₀ = 140 had a controlled character up to M_n = (132–148) × 10³ (PDI = 1.08–1.16). With MMA and St and using the same [M]₀/[I]₀, preliminary experiments were made; the higher the monomer conversion, the broader was the distribution of molecular weight of the products. Graft copolymerizations of all these monomers at [M]₀/[I]₀ = 840 or 1680 were successfully conducted up to high conversions. Low‐polydispersity copolymers, with very long side chains, in fact star‐like copolymers, were obtained mainly by tuning the deactivator amount in the reaction mixture. (PSt‐g‐PtBuA, DP_n,sc (DP of side chain) = 665, PDI = 1.24; PSt‐g‐PMMA, DP_n,sc = 670, PDI = 1.43; PSt‐g‐PSt, DP_n,sc = 324, PDI = 1.11). Total suppression of intermolecular coupling was achieved here. However, the low concentrations of initiator required long reaction times, leading sometimes to formation of a small amount (～5%) of low‐molecular‐weight polymer fraction. This concomitant process is discussed, and some measures for its prevention are proposed. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 100: 3662–3672, 2006     

Influence of block molecular weight on the properties of styrene‐ethylenebutylene‐styrene block copolymers

Styrene‐ethylene butylene‐styrene (S‐EB‐S) block copolymers with similar polystyrene contents and varying molecular weights (S‐EB‐S‐1, molecular weight: 8833‐41223‐8833; S‐EB‐S‐2, molecular weight: 15844‐70534‐15844; S‐EB‐S‐3, molecular weight: 26133‐111067‐26133) were used in this study. The domain size of the polystyrene phase marginally increases with an increase in polystyrene segmental weight as observed by atomic force microscopy. Dynamic mechanical measurements of these polymers were carried out over a wide range of temperatures and frequencies. These polymers exhibited three peaks: α, β, and γ in the tan δ‐temperature curve. With increase in the molecular weight of the S‐EB‐S polymers, the α‐transition temperature shifted to higher values, while the β‐ and γ‐transitions remained unaltered. Also, the elastic modulus and storage modulus decreased with increase in the molecular weight. The rheological behavior of the various S‐EB‐S polymers was studied using a Monsanto Processability Tester. These systems exhibited pseudoplastic flow behavior. The shear viscosity of these S‐EB‐S polymers decreased with an increase in the molecular weight from S‐EB‐S‐1 to S‐EB‐S‐3 polymers because of the wall slip and plug flow. The activation energy of the melt flow process was found to vary between 4 and 0.6 kcal/mol in the range of shear rates studied. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 77: 1621–1628, 2000     

Chemoenzymatic synthesis of Y‐shaped amphiphilic block copolymers and their micellization behavior

BACKGROUND: Y‐shaped block copolymers are a type of special star polymer that have received considerable attention due to their unique morphologies and phase behavior. This research is based on the preparation of novel Y‐shaped block copolymers using enzymatic ring‐opening polymerization (eROP) and atom‐transfer radical polymerization (ATRP), followed by an investigation of their micellization properties. RESULTS: Y‐shaped block copolymers consisting of polycaprolactone and poly(glycidyl methacrylate) were synthesized successfully by the combination of eROP and ATRP. NMR, gel permeation chromatography (GPC), Fourier transform infrared and atomic force microscopy analyses confirmed the compositions of the block copolymers. The dispersity obtained from GPC was less than 1.4, which indicated a control of the polymerization. The self‐assembly behavior of the Y‐shaped block copolymers was investigated in aqueous media. Aggregates of various morphologies (such as spherical micelles, lamellae, worm‐like micelles and large compound micelles) were observed. In addition, it was found that both the copolymer composition and concentration in tetrahydrofuran greatly influenced the morphologies of the aggregates. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the Y‐shaped diblock copolymers can be synthesized by simple methods. They have various morphologies, including normal spherical micelles, lamellae, worm‐like micelles and large compound micelles. Copyright © 2009 Society of Chemical Industry     

Preparation and characterization of hyperbranched polyacrylate copolymers by self‐condensing vinyl copolymerization (SCVCP)

A series of hyperbranched polyacrylate copolymers have been synthesized by self‐condensing vinyl copolymerization (SCVCP) of 2‐(2‐bromopropionyloxy)‐ethyl acrylate (BPEA) and methyl acrylate (MA) in the presence of CuBr and bipyridine. The structures and properties of the polymers obtained are characterized by NMR and SEC/RALLS/DV/RI measurements. The effects of reaction conditions on molecular weight (MW), molecular weight distribution (MWD) and degree of branching (DB) are investigated. © 2002 Society of Chemical Industry     

New syntheses of graft copolymers using the DPE-technique: ATRP graft copolymerization

Summary A new one-step synthesis of a set of macroinitiators for atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) via controlled radical polymerization is presented. The macroinitiators consist of methacrylate and p-chloromethylstyrene (CMS) and were synthesized by controlled radical polymerization in the presence of l,l-diphenylethylene (DPE) using azobisisobutyronitrile (AIBN) as initiator. The resulting macroinitiators were used for the ATRP of different methacrylates yielding graft copolymers which were characterized by SEC and NMR. Received: 25 July 2002/Revised version: 28 October 2002/ Accepted: 28 October 2002 Correspondence to Oskar Nuyken     

Synthesis of graft and block copolymers from 2‐dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate and caprolactone

This paper outlines the synthesis of a range of graft and block copolymers containing 2‐dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate and caprolactone sequences by means of two distinct strategies. In the first place, common to both pathways, low‐molar‐mass hydroxyl end‐capped polycaprolactone (PCL‐OH) was prepared by the ring‐opening polymerization of caprolactone in the presence of an aluminium alkoxide Schiff's base (HAPENAlOⁱPr) as initiator followed by hydrolysis of the Al? O bond. For the synthesis of copolymers with a main vinyl carbon–carbon backbone and PCL grafts, PCL‐OH was initially converted into ω‐methacryl‐PCL using methacryloyl chloride. This macromonomer was then copolymerized with 2‐dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate (DMAEMA) by atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP). For the synthesis of block copolymers, PCL‐OH was first transformed into a bromine end‐capped PCL (PCL‐Br) with 2‐bromoisobutyryl bromide. PCL‐Br was then used as macroinitiator in various concentrations for the ATRP of 2‐dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate, thus leading to PCL and poly(DMAEMA) blocks of varying lengths. The formation of both graft and block copolymers was thoroughly checked using NMR and size exclusion chromatography. Copyright © 2007 Society of Chemical Industry     

Graft copolymerization of methylmethacrylate with N‐substituted maleimide‐styrene copolymer by ATRP

Atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) was employed to prepare graft copolymers having poly(MBr)‐alt‐poly(St) copolymer as backbone and poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) as branches to obtain heat resistant graft copolymers. The macroinitiator was prepared by copolymerization of bromine functionalized maleimide (MBr) with styrene (St). The polymerization of MMA was initiated by poly(MBr)‐alt‐poly(St) carrying bromine groups as macroinitiator in the presence of copper bromide (CuBr) and bipyridine (bpy) at 110°C. Both macroinitiator and graft copolymers were characterized by ¹H NMR, GPC, DSC, and TGA. The ATRP graft copolymerization was supported by an increase in the molecular weight (MW) of the graft copolymers as compared to that of the macroinitiator and also by their monomodal MW distribution. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2006     

Synthesis of methyl methacrylate and N‐aryl itaconimide block copolymers via atom‐transfer radical polymerization

The paper describes the synthesis of block copolymers of methyl methacrylate (MMA) and N‐aryl itaconimides using atom‐transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) via a poly(methyl methacrylate)–Cl/CuBr/bipyridine initiating system or a reverse ATRP AIBN/FeCl₃·6H₂O/PPh₃ initiating system. Poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) macroinitiator, ie with a chlorine chain‐end (PMMA‐Cl), having a predetermined molecular weight (M_n = 1.27 × 10⁴ g mol^?1) and narrow polydispersity index (PDI = 1.29) was prepared using AIBN/FeCl₃·6H₂O/PPh₃, which was then used to polymerize N‐aryl itaconimides. Increase in molecular weight with little effect on polydispersity was observed on polymerization of N‐aryl itaconimides using the PMMA‐Cl/CuBr/Bpy initiating system. Only oligomeric blocks of N‐aryl itaconimides could be incorporated in the PMMA backbone. High molecular weight copolymer with a narrow PDI (1.43) could be prepared using tosyl chloride (TsCl) as an initiator and CuBr/bipyridine as catalyst when a mixture of MMA and N‐(p‐chlorophenyl) itaconimide in the molar ratio of 0.83:0.17 was used. Thermal characterization was performed using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and dynamic thermogravimetry. DSC traces of the block copolymers showed two shifts in base‐line in some of the block copolymers; the first transition corresponds to the glass transition temperature of PMMA and second transition corresponds to the glass transition temperature of poly(N‐aryl itaconimides). A copolymer obtained by taking a mixture of monomers ie MMA:N‐(p‐chlorophenyl) itaconimide in the molar ratio of 0.83:0.17 showed a single glass transition temperature. Copyright © 2005 Society of Chemical Industry     

Hyperbranched–linear–hyperbranched ABA‐type block copolymers based on poly(ethylene oxide) and polyglycerol

BACKGROUND: Until recently, hyperbranched polymers were thought to be ill‐defined materials that were not useful as building blocks for well‐defined complex polymer architectures. It is a current challenge to develop strategies that offer rapid access to well‐defined hyperbranched block copolymers. RESULTS: A convenient three‐step protocol for the synthesis of double‐hydrophilic hyperbranched–linear–hyperbranched ABA‐type triblock copolymers based on poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) and hyperbranched polyglycerol (hbPG) is presented. The Bola‐type polymers exhibiting an aliphatic polyether structure were prepared from a linear (lin) linPG‐b‐PEO‐b‐linPG precursor triblock. The materials exhibit low polydispersities (M_w/M_n) in the range 1.19–1.45. The molecular weights of the block copolymers range from 6300 to 26 200 g mol^?1, varying in the length of both the linear PEO chain as well as the hbPG segments. Detailed characterization of the thermal properties using differential scanning calorimetry demonstrates nanophase segregation of the blocks. CONCLUSION: The first example of well‐defined ABA hyperbranched–linear–hyperbranched triblock copolymers with PEO middle block and hbPG A‐blocks is presented. The biocompatible nature of the aliphatic polyether blocks renders these materials interesting for biomedical purposes. These new materials are also intriguing with respect to their supramolecular order and biomineralization properties. Copyright © 2009 Society of Chemical Industry     

A new synthetic approach to asymmetric amphiphilic ABA′ block copolymers by ATRP and click reactions

Well‐defined asymmetric amphiphilic ABA′ block copolymers composed of poly(ethylene oxide) monomethylene ether (MPEO) with different molecular weights as A or A′ block and poly(styrene) (PS) as B block were synthesized by the combination of atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) and click reactions. First, bromine‐terminated diblock copolymer poly(ethylene oxide) monomethylene ether‐block‐poly(styrene) (MPEO‐PS‐Br) was prepared by ATRP of styrene initiated with macroinitiator MPEO‐Br, which was prepared from the esterification of MPEO and 2‐bromoisobutyryl bromide. Then, the azido‐terminated diblock copolymers MPEO‐PS‐N₃ were prepared through the bromine substitution reaction with sodium azide. Propargyl‐terminated MPEO with a different molecular weight was prepared under the basic condition from propargyl alcohol and p‐toluenesulfonyl‐terminated MPEO, which was prepared through the esterification of MPEO and p‐toluenesulfochloride using pyridine as solvent. Asymmetric amphiphilic ABA′ block copolymers, with a wide range of number–average molecular weights from 1.92 × 10⁴ to 2.47 × 10⁴ and a narrow polydispersity from 1.03 to 1.05, were synthesized via a click reaction of the azido‐terminated diblock copolymers and the propargyl‐terminated MPEO in the presence of CuBr and 1,1,4,7,7‐pentamethyldiethylenetriamine (PMDETA) catalyst system. The structures of these ABA′ block copolymers and corresponding precursors were characterized by NMR, IR, and GPC. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2009     

AB‐ and ABC‐type di‐ and triblock copolymers of poly[styrene‐block‐(ε‐caprolactone)] and poly[styrene‐block‐(ε‐caprolactone)‐block‐lactide]: synthesis,characterization and thermal studies

Polystyrene terminated with benzyl alcohol units was employed as a macroinitiator for ring‐opening polymerization of ε‐caprolactone and L ‐lactide to yield AB‐ and ABC‐type block copolymers. Even though there are many reports on the diblock copolymers of poly(styrene‐block‐lactide) and poly(styrene‐block‐lactone), this is the first report on the poly(styrene‐block‐lactone‐block‐lactide) triblock copolymer consisting of two semicrystalline and degradable segments. The triblock copolymers exhibited twin melting behavior in differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) analysis with thermal transitions corresponding to each of the lactone and lactide blocks. The block derived from ε‐caprolactone also showed crystallization transitions upon cooling from the melt. In the DSC analysis, one of the triblock copolymers showed an exothermic transition well above the melting temperature upon cooling. Thermogravimetric analysis of these block copolymers showed a two‐step degradation curve for the diblock copolymer and a three‐step degradation for the triblock copolymer with each of the degradation steps associated with each segment of the block copolymers. The present study shows that it is possible to make pure triblock copolymers with two semicrystalline segments which also consist of degradable blocks. Copyright © 2009 Society of Chemical Industry