Hydrogen production from coal gasification for effective downstream CO2 capture

The coal gasification process is used in commercial production of synthetic gas as a means toward clean use of coal. The conversion of solid coal into a gaseous phase creates opportunities to produce more energy forms than electricity (which is the case in coal combustion systems) and to separate CO₂ in an effective manner for sequestration. The current work compares the energy and exergy efficiencies of an integrated coal-gasification combined-cycle power generation system with that of coal gasification-based hydrogen production system which uses water-gas shift and membrane reactors. Results suggest that the syngas-to-hydrogen (H₂) system offers 35% higher energy and 17% higher exergy efficiencies than the syngas-to-electricity (IGCC) system. The specific CO₂ emission from the hydrogen system was 5% lower than IGCC system. The Brayton cycle in the IGCC system draws much nitrogen after combustion along with CO₂. Thus CO₂ capture and compression become difficult due to the large volume of gases involved, unlike the hydrogen system which has 80% less nitrogen in its exhaust stream. The extra electrical power consumption for compressing the exhaust gases to store CO₂ is above 70% for the IGCC system but is only 4.5% for the H₂ system. Overall the syngas-to-hydrogen system appears advantageous to the IGCC system based on the current analysis.     

Combined production of hydrogen and power from heavy oil gasification: Pinch analysis,thermodynamic and economic evaluations

Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) represents a commercially proven technology available for the combined production of hydrogen and electricity power from coal and heavy residue oils. When associated with CO₂ capture and sequestration facilities, the IGCC plant gives an answer to the search for a clean and environmentally compatible use of high sulphur and heavy metal contents fuels, the possibility of installing large size plants for competitive electric power and hydrogen production, and a low cost of CO₂ avoidance.     

Combined power and hydrogen production from coal. Part B: Comparison between the IGHP and CPH systems

Currently, plants for hydrogen production from coal are based on IGCC (Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle) technologies with CO₂ capture and electrical power is also produced by using the purge gas coming from the hydrogen separation unit as fuel in a gas turbine combined cycle.     

Sorbent enhanced hydrogen production from steam gasification of coal integrated with CO2 capture

In this work, CO₂ capture and H₂ production during the steam gasification of coal integrated with CO₂ capture sorbent were investigated using a horizontal fixed bed reactor at atmospheric pressure. Four different temperatures (650, 675, 700, and 750 °C) and three sorbent-to-carbon ratios ([Ca]/[C] = 0, 1, 2) were studied. In the absence of sorbent, the maximum molar fraction of H₂ (64.6%) and conversion of coal (71.3%) were exhibited at the highest temperature (750 °C). The experimental results verified that the presence of sorbent in the steam gasification of coal enhanced the molar fraction of H₂ to more than 80%, with almost all CO₂ was fixed into the sorbent structure, and carbon monoxide (CO) was converted to H₂ and CO₂ through the water gas shift reaction. The steam gasification of coal integrated with CO₂ capture largely depended on the reaction temperature and exhibited optimal conditions at 675 °C. The maximum molar fraction of H₂ (81.7%) and minimum CO₂ concentration (almost 0%) were obtained at 675 °C and a sorbent-to-carbon ratio of 2.     

Production of power using underground coal gasification

Underground coal gasification (UCG) is a process that converts deep, un-mineable coal resources into syngas, which can then be converted into valuable end products such as electric power. This paper provides a summary of the options to combine UCG with electric power production and focuses on commercial-scale applications using a combined-cycle power plant including integration options and syngas cleanup steps. Simulation results for a UCG power plant with carbon capture are compared against the results for an equivalent Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) plant using the same feedstock. Relative capital cost savings for a UCG power plant are estimated based on published IGCC process unit costs. The UCG power plant with carbon capture is shown to provide a higher thermal efficiency, lower CO₂ intensity, and lower capital cost than an equivalent IGCC plant. Finally, the potential of UCG as a method for producing cost-effective, low-emissions electrical power from deep coal is discussed and some of the challenges and opportunities are summarized.     

Thermodynamic performance assessment and comparison of IGCC with solid cycling process for CO2 capture at high and medium temperatures

Solid sorbents can be used to capture CO₂ from pre-combustion sources at various temperatures. MgO and CaO are typical medium- and high-temperature CO₂ sorbents. However, pure MgO is not active toward CO₂. The addition of Na₂CO₃ increases the operating temperature and significantly increases the reactivity of sorbents to capture CO₂. Na₂CO₃-promoted MgO is a promising medium-temperature CO₂ sorbent. In this study, the thermodynamic performance of integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) systems with Na₂CO₃–MgO-based warm gas decarbonation (WGDC) and CaO-based hot gas decarbonation (HGDC) is evaluated and compared with that of an IGCC system with methyldiethanolamine (MDEA)-based cold gas decarbonation (CGDC). Assuming that the average CO₂ capture capacities of solid sorbents are one-third of their theoretical maxima, we reveal that the IGCC system undergoes approximately 2.8% and 3.6% improvement on net efficiency when switching from CGDC to WGDC and to HGDC, respectively. The net efficiency of the system is increased by improving the CO₂ capture capacity of the sorbent. The IGCC with Na₂CO₃–MgO experiences more significant increase in efficiency than that with CaO along with the improvement of sorbent average CO₂ capture capacity. The efficiency of the IGCC systems reaches the same value when the average CO₂ capture capacities of both sorbents are 53% of their theoretical levels. The effects of gas turbine combustor fuel gas inlet temperature on IGCC system performance are analyzed. Results show that the efficiency of the IGCC systems with HGDC and WGDC increases by 0.74% and 0.53% respectively as the fuel gas inlet temperature increases from 250 °C to 650 °C.     

Study on different zero CO2 emission IGCC systems with CO2 capture by integrating OTM

In this paper, different zero CO₂ emission integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) systems based on the oxy‐fuel combustion method by integrating with oxygen ion transfer membrane (OTM) with and without sweep gas are proposed in order to reduce the energy consumption of CO₂ capture. By utilizing the Aspen Plus software, the overall system models are established. The performances of the proposed systems are compared with the traditional IGCC system without CO₂ capture and the zero CO₂ emission IGCC system based on the oxy‐fuel combustion method using the cryogenic air separation unit. In addition, the effects of OTM key parameters on the proposed system performance, such as the feed side pressure, permeate side pressure, and operating temperature, are investigated and analyzed. The results show that the efficiency of the zero CO₂ emission IGCC system based on the oxy‐fuel combustion method integrated with OTM without sweep gas is 6.67% lower than that of the traditional IGCC system without CO₂ capture, but 1.88% higher than that of the zero CO₂ emission IGCC system using the cryogenic air separation unit, and 0.64% lower than that of the proposed system with sweep gas. The research achievements will provide valuable references for further study on CO₂ capture based on IGCC with lower energy penalty. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

CO2 sorbents for a sorption-enhanced water–gas-shift process in IGCC plants: A thermodynamic analysis and process simulation study

A sorption-enhanced water–gas-shift reaction process (SEWGS) combines the WGS reaction and CO₂ removal into a single process step in an integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) power plant. In the SEWGS, a solid sorbent is employed to capture the CO₂ generated by the WGS reaction. A key technical issue for the SEWGS is to identify and develop sorbents that can capture CO₂ under high pressure and high temperature syngas conditions and minimize or even eliminate the need for WGS catalysts. We present the results from a thermodynamic analysis and process simulation study that aimed to identify sorbents and optimal temperature windows to maximize the thermal efficiency of an IGCC + SEWGS plant. The results from the thermodynamic analysis identified two metal oxides, one silicate, three zirconates, and one titanate sorbents that are suitable for the SEWGS application. The results from the process simulation study revealed that the overall thermal efficiency of a 1187 MW_th (thermal input) IGCC + SEWGS plant gasifying an Illinois coal, and using the seven sorbents selected from the thermodynamic analysis, was between 0.5 and 2.4 percentage points greater than that of a reference IGCC + Selexol plant.     

CO2 control technology effects on IGCC plant performance and cost

As part of the USDOE's Carbon Sequestration Program, an integrated modeling framework has been developed to evaluate the performance and cost of alternative carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies for fossil-fueled power plants in the context of multi-pollutant control requirements. This paper uses the newly developed model of an integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) plant to analyze the effects of adding CCS to an IGCC system employing a GE quench gasifier with water gas shift reactors and a Selexol system for CO₂ capture. Parameters of interest include the effects on plant performance and cost of varying the CO₂ removal efficiency, the quality and cost of coal, and selected other factors affecting overall plant performance and cost. The stochastic simulation capability of the model is also used to illustrate the effect of uncertainties or variability in key process and cost parameters. The potential for advanced oxygen production and gas turbine technologies to reduce the cost and environmental impacts of IGCC with CCS is also analyzed.     

Integrated gasification and Cu-Cl cycle for trigeneration of hydrogen, steam and electricity

This paper develops and analyzes an integrated process model of an Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) and a thermochemical copper-chlorine (Cu-Cl) cycle for trigeneration of hydrogen, steam and electricity. The process model is developed with Aspen HYSYS software. By using oxygen instead of air for the gasification process, where oxygen is provided by the integrated Cu-Cl cycle, it is found that the hydrogen content of produced syngas increases by about 20%, due to improvement of the gasification combustion efficiency and reduction of syngas NO_x emissions. Moreover, about 60% of external heat required for the integrated Cu-Cl cycle can be provided by the IGCC plant, with minor modifications of the steam cycle, and a slight decrease of IGCC overall efficiency. Integration of gasification and thermochemical hydrogen production can provide significant improvements in the overall hydrogen, steam and electricity output, when compared against the processes each operating separately and independently of each other.     

Economic implications of pre- and post-combustion calcium looping configurations applied to gasification power plants

Gasification is a promising conversion technology to deliver high energy efficiency simultaneously with low energy and cost penalties for carbon capture. This paper is devoted to in-depth economic evaluations of pre- and post-combustion Calcium Looping (CaL) configurations for Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) power plants. The poly-generation capability, e.g. hydrogen and power co-generation, is also discussed. The post-combustion CaL option is a gasification power plant in which the flue gases from the gas turbine are treated for CO₂ capture in a carbonation–calcination cycle. In pre-combustion CaL option, the Sorbent Enhanced Water Gas Shift (SEWGS) feature is used to produce hydrogen which is used for power generation. As benchmark case, a conventional gasification power plant without carbon capture was considered. Net power output of evaluated cases is in the range of 550–600 MW with more than 95% carbon capture rate. The pre-combustion capture configuration was evaluated also in hydrogen and power co-generation scenario. The evaluations are concentrated for estimation of capital costs, specific investment cost, operational & maintenance (O&M) costs, CO₂ removal and avoidance costs, electricity costs, sensitivity analysis of technical and economic assumptions on key economic indicators etc.     

A comparison of electricity and hydrogen production systems with CO2 capture and storage. Part A: Review and selection of promising conversion and capture technologies

We performed a consistent comparison of state-of-the-art and advanced electricity and hydrogen production technologies with CO₂ capture using coal and natural gas, inspired by the large number of studies, of which the results can in fact not be compared due to specific assumptions made. After literature review, a standardisation and selection exercise has been performed to get figures on conversion efficiency, energy production costs and CO₂ avoidance costs of different technologies, the main parameters for comparison. On the short term, electricity can be produced with 85–90% CO₂ capture by means of NGCC and PC with chemical absorption and IGCC with physical absorption at 4.7–6.9 €ct/kWh, assuming a coal and natural gas price of 1.7 and 4.7 €/GJ. CO₂ avoidance costs are between 15 and 50 €/t CO₂ for IGCC and NGCC, respectively. On the longer term, both improvements in existing conversion and capture technologies are foreseen as well as new power cycles integrating advanced turbines, fuel cells and novel (high-temperature) separation technologies. Electricity production costs might be reduced to 4.5–5.3 €ct/kWh with advanced technologies. However, no clear ranking can be made due to large uncertainties pertaining to investment and O&M costs. Hydrogen production is more attractive for low-cost CO₂ capture than electricity production. Costs of large-scale hydrogen production by means of steam methane reforming and coal gasification with CO₂ capture from the shifted syngas are estimated at 9.5 and 7 €/GJ, respectively. Advanced autothermal reforming and coal gasification deploying ion transport membranes might further reduce production costs to 8.1 and 6.4 €/GJ. Membrane reformers enable small-scale hydrogen production at nearly 17 €/GJ with relatively low-cost CO₂ capture.     

Effect of supplementary firing options on cycle performance and CO2 emissions of an IGCC power generation system

Supplementary firing is adopted in combined‐cycle power plants to reheat low‐temperature gas turbine exhaust before entering into the heat recovery steam generator. In an effort to identify suitable supplementary firing options in an integrated gasification combined‐cycle (IGCC) power plant configuration, so as to use coal effectively, the performance is compared for three different supplementary firing options. The comparison identifies the better of the supplementary firing options based on higher efficiency and work output per unit mass of coal and lower CO₂ emissions. The three supplementary firing options with the corresponding fuel used for the supplementary firing are: (i) partial gasification with char, (ii) full gasification with coal and (iii) full gasification with syngas. The performance of the IGCC system with these three options is compared with an option of the IGCC system without supplementary firing. Each supplementary firing option also involves pre‐heating of the air entering the gas turbine combustion chamber in the gas cycle and reheating of the low‐pressure steam in the steam cycle. The effects on coal consumption and CO₂ emissions are analysed by varying the operating conditions such as pressure ratio, gas turbine inlet temperature, air pre‐heat and supplementary firing temperature. The results indicate that more work output is produced per unit mass of coal when there is no supplementary firing. Among the supplementary firing options, the full gasification with syngas option produces the highest work output per unit mass of coal, and the partial gasification with char option emits the lowest amount of CO₂ per unit mass of coal. Based on the analysis, the most advantageous option for low specific coal consumption and CO₂ emissions is the supplementary firing case having full gasification with syngas as the fuel. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

CO<Subscript>2</Subscript> mitigation in coal gasification cogeneration systems with integration of the shift reaction,CO<Subscript>2</Subscript> absorption and methanol production

Cogeneration of electricity and liquid fuel can achieve higher efficiencies than electricity generation alone in Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC), and cogeneration systems are also expected to mitigate CO₂ emissions. A proposed methanol-electricity cogeneration system was analyzed in this paper using exergy method to evaluate the specified system. A simple cogeneration scheme and a complicated scheme including the shift reaction and CO₂ removal were compared. The results show that the complicated scheme consumes more energy, but has a higher methanol synthesis ratio with partial capture of CO₂. In those methanol and electricity cogeneration systems, the CO₂ mitigation is not merely an additional process that consumes energy and reduces the overall efficiency, but is integrated into the methanol production.     

Performance evaluation of integrated gasification solid oxide fuel cell/gas turbine systems including carbon dioxide capture

In this study, system layouts for integrated gasification solid oxide fuel cell/gas turbine (IG-SOFC/GT) systems were proposed and their performance was comparatively evaluated. A baseline IGCC was simulated, and the calculation models were validated. Based on the IGCC system, two IG-SOFC/GT system layouts with different SOFC thermal management methods were established, and their performance was analyzed. The IG-SOFC/GT systems were found to produce much higher power and better efficiency than the IGCC. With regard to SOFC thermal management, the exit gas recirculation scheme showed better performance than the cathode heat exchange scheme. The impact of CO₂ capture was investigated in both the IGCC and IG-SOFC/GT systems, and the penalties in power output and efficiency due to pre-combustion CO₂ capture were found to be milder in the IG-SOFC/GT systems than in the IGCC. An IG-SOFC/GT system adopting oxy-combustion-based CO₂ capture was proposed, and its thermal efficiency was predicted to be sensibly higher than the system with pre-combustion CO₂ capture. Its net power output was predicted to be less than that of the system with pre-combustion technology, but was still much larger than that of the IGCC with pre-combustion CO₂ capture.     

Boiling coal in water: Hydrogen production and power generation system with zero net CO2 emission based on coal and supercritical water gasification

Coal is the single most important fuel for power generation today. Nowadays, most coal is consumed by means of “burning coal in air” and pollutants such as NO_x, SO_x, CO₂, PM2.5 etc. are inevitably formed and mixed with excessive amount of inner gases, so the pollutant emission reduction system is complicated and the cost is high. IGCC is promising because coal is gasified before utilization. However, the coal gasifier mostly operates in gas environments, so special equipments are needed for the purification of the raw gas and CO₂ emission reduction. Coal and supercritical water gasification process is another promising way to convert coal efficiently and cleanly to H₂ and pure CO₂. The gasification process is referred to as “boiling coal in water” and pollutants containing S and N deposit as solid residual and can be discharged from the gasifier. A novel thermodynamics cycle power generation system was proposed by us in State Key Laboratory of Multiphase Flow in Power Engineering (SKLMFPE) of Xi'an jiaotong University (XJTU), which is based on coal and supercritical water gasification and multi-staged steam turbine reheated by hydrogen combustion. It is characterized by its high coal-electricity efficiency, zero net CO₂ emission and no pollutants. A series of experimental devices from quartz tube system to a pilot scale have been established to realize the complete gasification of coal in SKLMFPE. It proved the prospects of coal and supercritical water gasification process and the novel thermodynamics cycle power generation system.     

Long-term CO2 capture tests of Pd-based composite membranes with module configuration

In this study, we investigate the configuration of a Pd–Au composite membrane on a porous nickel support and membrane modules for withstanding the capture of CO₂ from a coal gasifier for a long time. The hydrogen permeation flux, recovery and CO₂ capture were experimentally evaluated using two different modules and two conditions. As in our study, the CO₂ capturing and durability tests were performed with a 40% CO₂/60% H₂ feed gas mixture in stainless steel (SS) 316L and 310S membrane modules. As a result, it is achieved the durability tests for more than 1150, 1100 (SS 316L module) and 3150 h (SS 310S module) with pressure cycles from 100 to 2000 kPa at 673 K. The durability of the membranes and membrane modules was demonstrated under pressure cycles from 100 to 2000 kPa at 673 K and the SS 310S module was very stable after 3150 h. The durability test for more than 3000 h demonstrated that there was no significant intermetallic diffusion between the PNS and Pd–Au layer. The CO₂ capturing test performed using a 40% CO₂/60% H₂ mixture confirmed that the CO₂ capturing capacity of the membrane and membrane module was 2.0 L/min for a CO₂ concentration in the retentate stream of 92.3% and that the hydrogen recovery ratio increased with increasing pressure and reached 93.4%. Furthermore, we suggest that the SS 310S module configuration, CO₂ capturing test using Pd–Au/ZrO₂/PNS membrane and membrane module is very suitable for application as an Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) system due to very simple numbering-up stackable module design was successful.     

Life cycle GHG assessment of fossil fuel power plants with carbon capture and storage

The evaluation of life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from power generation with carbon capture and storage (CCS) is a critical factor in energy and policy analysis. The current paper examines life cycle emissions from three types of fossil-fuel-based power plants, namely supercritical pulverized coal (super-PC), natural gas combined cycle (NGCC) and integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC), with and without CCS. Results show that, for a 90% CO₂ capture efficiency, life cycle GHG emissions are reduced by 75–84% depending on what technology is used. With GHG emissions less than 170 g/kWh, IGCC technology is found to be favorable to NGCC with CCS. Sensitivity analysis reveals that, for coal power plants, varying the CO₂ capture efficiency and the coal transport distance has a more pronounced effect on life cycle GHG emissions than changing the length of CO₂ transport pipeline. Finally, it is concluded from the current study that while the global warming potential is reduced when MEA-based CO₂ capture is employed, the increase in other air pollutants such as NO_x and NH₃ leads to higher eutrophication and acidification potentials.     

Shell coal IGCCS with carbon capture: Conventional gas quench vs. innovative configurations

The Shell coal integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) based on the gas quench system is one of the most fuel flexible and energy efficient gasification processes because is dry feed and employs high temperature syngas coolers capable of rising high pressure steam. Indeed the efficiency of a Shell IGCC with the best available technologies is calculated to be 47–48%. However the system looses many percentage points of efficiency (up to 10) when introducing carbon capture. To overcome this penalty, two approaches have been proposed. In the first, the expensive syngas coolers are replaced by a “partial water quench” where the raw syngas stream is cooled and humidified via direct injection of hot water. This design is less costly, but also less efficient. The second approach retains syngas coolers but instead employs novel water–gas shift (WGS) configurations that requires substantially less steam to obtain the same degree of CO conversion to CO₂, and thus increases the overall plant efficiency. We simulate and optimize these novel configurations, provide a detailed thermodynamic and economic analysis and investigate how these innovations alter the plant’s efficiency, cost and complexity.     

Coal gasification with in situ CO2 capture by the synthetic CaO sorbent in a 1 kWth dual fluidised-bed reactor

Coal gasification with in situ CO₂ capture is believed to be able to produce highly concentrated H₂ with little or no CO₂ compared with the conventional process. This has been demonstrated by other researchers working on a single fluidised bed by continuously feeding the CaO sorbent. This work presents the results of coal gasification with in situ CO₂ capture by a synthetic CaO sorbent in a 1 kW_th dual fluidised-bed reactor at atmospheric pressure, which has not been reported in the literature. The synthetic CaO sorbent is cyclically used by going through multiple carbonation/calcination cycles during coal gasification.