Electronic portal imaging with on-line correction of setup error in thoracic irradiation: clinical evaluation

PURPOSE: To analyze setup errors and the feasibility of their on-line correction using electronic portal imaging in the irradiation of lung tumors. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Sixteen patients with lung cancer were irradiated through opposed anteroposterior fields. Localization images of anteroposterior fields were recorded with an electronic portal imaging device (EPID). Using an in-house developed algorithm for on-line comparison of portal images setup errors were measured and a correction of table position was performed with a remote couch control prior to treatment. In addition, residual errors were measured on the EPID verification image. Global and individual mean and standard deviation of setup errors were calculated and compared. The feasibility of the procedure was assessed measuring intra- and interobserver variability, influence of organ movement, reproducibility of error measurement, the extra time fraction needed for measuring and adjusting and the fraction of dose needed for imaging. RESULTS: In two setups the procedure could not be finished normally due to problems inherent to the procedure. The reproducibility, intraobserver variability, and influence of organ movements were each described by a distribution with a mean value less than or equal to 1 mm and a standard deviation (SD) of less than 1.5 mm. The interobserver variability showed to be a little bit larger (mean: 0.3 mm, SD: 1.7 mm). The mean time to perform the irradiation of the anteroposterior field was 4 +/- 1 min. The mean time for the measurement and correction procedure approximated 2.5 min. The mean extra time fraction was 65 +/- 24% (1 SD) with more than half of this coming from the error measurement. The dose needed for generation of EPID images was 5.9 +/- 1.4% of total treatment dose. The mean and SD of setup errors were, respectively, 0.1 and 4.5 mm for longitudinal and -2.0 and 5.7 mm for transversal errors. Of 196 measured translational errors 120 (61%) exceeded the adjustment criteria. For individual patients systematic and random setup errors can be as high as, respectively, 15.8 and 7.5 mm. Mean residual error and SD were for longitudinal direction 0.08 and 1.2 mm and for transversal direction -0.9 and 1.0 mm (pooled data). For individuals, the mean residual errors were smaller than 1 mm, with a typical SD per patient of less than 2 mm. CONCLUSION: Setup errors in thoracic radiation therapy are clinically important. On-line correction can be performed accurately with an objective measurement tool, although this prolongs the irradiation procedure for one field with 65%.     

Angiotensin I-converting enzyme gene polymorphism in a low-risk European population for coronary artery disease

PURPOSE: Physiologic and non-physiologic tumor motion complicates the use of tight margins in three-dimensional (3D) conformal radiotherapy. Setup reproducibility is an important non-physiologic cause of tumor motion. The objective of this study is to evaluate and compare patient setup reproducibility using the reusable T-bar and the disposable expanded foam immobilization device (EFID) in radiation therapy for lung cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Two hundred forty-four portal films were taken from 16 prospectively accrued patients treated for lung cancer. Patients were treated with either a pair of anterior and posterior parallel opposing fields (POF), or a combination of POF and a three-field isocentric technique. Each patient was treated in a supine position using either the T-bar setup or EFID. Six patients were treated in both devices over their treatment courses. Field placement analysis was used to evaluate 3D setup reproducibility, by comparing positions of bony landmarks relative to the radiation field edges in digitized simulator and portal images. Anterior-posterior, lateral, and longitudinal displacements, as well as field rotations along coronal and sagittal planes were measured. Statistical analyses of variance were applied to the deviations among portal films of all patients and the subgroup treated with both immobilization methods. RESULTS: For the T-bar immobilization device, standard deviations of the setup reproducibility were 5.1, 3.7, and 5.1 mm in the anterior-posterior, lateral, and longitudinal dimensions, respectively. Rotations in the coronal plane and the sagittal plane were 0.9 degrees and 1.0 degrees, respectively. For the EFID, corresponding standard deviations of set up reproducibility were 3.6 mm, 5.3 mm, 5.4 mm, 0.7 degrees and 1.4 degrees, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference (p = 0.22) in the 3D setup reproducibility between T-bar and EFID. Subgroup analysis for the patients who were treated with both immobilization devices did not reveal a difference either. There was no consistent systematic error from simulator to treatment unit identified for either immobilization device. CONCLUSION: Although the optimal immobilization technique and patient positioning for thoracic radiotherapy have yet to be determined, this study indicates that T-bar is comparable with EFID in its setup reproducibility. In view of the inherent advantages of T-bar, it has become a standard immobilization device at our institution. The observed range of displacements in field positioning with either immobilization device implies that one cm (two standard deviations [SD] of setup error) will be a more appropriate margin to allow for setup variability in radiation therapy for lung cancer.     

The reliability of the detection of an early diastolic notch with uterine artery Doppler velocimetry

BACKGROUND: Traumatic tattoos result from mechanical penetration of the skin by foreign-body particles associated with puncture, abrasive, or explosive trauma. Until the recent development of the Q-switched lasers, it was not possible to remove tattoo pigments without scar and pigmentary changes. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness of the Q-switched alexandrite laser (wavelength, 755 nm; pulsewidth, 100 ns), in treating the 27 cases of Asian skin with 36 traumatic tattoos and to observe any side effects such as scarring or pigmentary change. METHODS: The results of treatments on 16 patients with 19 penetrant tattoos, 10 patients with 16 abrasive tattoos and 1 patient with bomb explosion were clinically analyzed. RESULTS: Greater than 76% removal of tattooed pigments required an average of 1.7 treatment sessions in penetrant tattoos in contrast with 2.4 sessions in abrasive tattoos. The excellent removal of traumatic tattoos required 7.5 J/cm2 except the scarred region of one explosive tattoo and one abrasive tattoo on soil. There were no permanent side effects such as scar or permanent pigmentary changes. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the Q-switched alexandrite laser is a safe and highly effective modality for removal of various traumatic tattoos without scar or permanent pigmentary change in Asian skin.     

Evaluation of the Nd/YAG laser for treatment of amateur and professional tattoos

Two hundred and twenty-one amateur tattoos and 27 professional tattoos were treated with a Nd/YAG laser (lambda 1064 nm and 532 nm). The response was expressed as the percentage area cleared of tattoo. Seventy-nine per cent of amateur black tattoos were > or = 75% clear after one to five treatments (mean 2) at 1064 nm. The response of professional tattoos was slower and less complete. Seventy-four per cent of black professional tattoos were > or = 75% clear after one to 11 treatments (mean 6.3) at 1064 nm. Red tattoos responded well to 532 nm and were > or = 75% clear after one to five treatments. Yellow, orange, blue and green tattoos were resistant to treatment. Side-effects included minor scarring in 1.2% of tattoos and transient pigmentary changes in 77% of patients.     

Pelvic irradiation of the obese patient: a treatment strategy involving megavoltage simulation and intratreatment setup corrections

This study involves a fractionated course of external radiation therapy for a 42 year old female weighing 150 kg, diagnosed with stage IIb cancer of the cervix. The patient could not be simulated in the conventional sense due to weight restrictions on the simulator couch, and body casts or molds were impractical. Using an on-line portal imaging device, treatment fields were established during the first session, and intratreatment verification was used before every subsequent treatment to measure and, when necessary, to correct the patient setup. Two courses of treatment were prescribed with a total dose of 60 Gy delivered by a four field box technique (A/P, P/A, and two lateral fields). Out of a total of 108 treatment fields monitored, 12 anterior fields and 1 posterior field were corrected (exclusive of the first, or simulation fraction). Without corrections, 10% of the initial setup displacements would have had displacements greater than 10 mm, 21% greater than 7 mm, and 41% greater than 5 mm. With the application of intratreatment corrections, only 2% of the displacements were greater than 10 mm, 11% were greater than 7 mm, and 32% were greater than 5 mm. It was also found that the second field treated in a parallel opposed pair (i.e., anterior/posterior or left/right lateral) had lower setup displacements and did not require verification or correction.     

Epidural opioids for post-thoracotomy pain

The treatment of abutting fields presents multiple difficulties, including problems of field overlaps or gaps, complexity of simulation, and the difficulties of daily setup and variation. Multiple techniques have been described for the treatment of the breast/chest wall and supraclavicular nodes using tangents and a matched supraclavicular field. The techniques described have used collimator angles, couch angles, and/or corner blocks in an attempt to match these fields with no overlap or gap. Some of these techniques required complex calculations or treatment devices to achieve a geometric match between fields. We describe a technique for treatment of breast and supraclavicular nodes that uses a single isocenter and requires asymmetric collimator jaws to give half-blocked fields. The simulation and setup are done empirically, with no complex calculations required. The daily setup and treatment can be done rapidly and reliably, with no extra equipment required. Custom blocks may be used to conform to the chest wall contour and decrease the amount of lung in the treatment fields.     

Population dynamics of the Wolbachia infection causing cytoplasmic incompatibility in Drosophila melanogaster

PURPOSE: The use of escalated radiation doses to improve local control in conformal radiotherapy of prostatic cancer is becoming the focus of many centers. There are, however, increased side effects associated with increased radiotherapy doses that are believed to be dependent on the volume of normal tissue irradiated. For this reason, accurate patient positioning, CT planning with 3D reconstruction of volumes of interest, clear definition of treatment margins and verification of treatment fields are necessary components of the quality control for these procedures. In this study electronic portal images are used to (a) evaluate the magnitude and effect of the setup errors encountered in patient positioning techniques, and (b) verify the multileaf collimator (MLC) field patterns for each of the treatment fields. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The Phase I volume, with a planning target volume (PTV) composed of the gross tumour volume (GTV) plus a 1.5 cm margin is treated conformally with a three-field plan (usually an anterior field and two lateral or oblique fields). A Phase II, with no margin around the GTV, is treated using two lateral and four oblique fields. Portal images are acquired and compared to digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRR) and/or simulator films during Phase I to assess the systematic (CT planning or simulator to treatment error) and the daily random errors. The match results from these images are used to correct for the systematic errors, if necessary, and to monitor the time trends and effectiveness of patient imobilization systems used during the Phase I treatment course. For the Phase II, portal images of an anterior and lateral field (larger than the treatment fields) matched to DRRs (or simulator images) are used to verify the isocenter position 1 week before start of Phase II. The Portal images are acquired for all the treatment fields on the first day to verify the MLC field patterns and archived for records. The final distribution of the setup errors was used to calculate modified dose-volume histograms (DVHs). This procedure was carried out on 36 prostate cancer patients, 12 with vacuum-molded (VacFix) bags for immobilization and 24 with no immobilization. RESULTS: The systematic errors can be visualized and corrected for before the doses are increased above the conventional levels. The requirement for correction of these errors (e.g., 2.5 mm AP shift) was demonstrated, using DVHs, in the observed 10% increase in rectal volume receiving at least 60 Gy. The random (daily) errors observed showed the need for patient fixation devices when treating with reduced margins. The percentage of fields with displacements of < or = 5.0 mm increased from 82 to 96% with the use of VacFix bags. The rotation of the pelvis is also minimized when the bags are used, with over 95% of the fields with rotations of < or = 2.0 degrees compared to 85% without. Currently, a combination of VacFix and thermoplastic casts is being investigated. CONCLUSION: The systematic errors can easily be identified and corrected for in the early stages of the Phase I treatment course. The time trends observed during the course of Phase I in conjunction with the isocenter verification at the start of Phase II give good prediction of the accuracy of the setup during Phase II, where visibility of identifiable structures is reduced in the small fields. The acquisition and inspection of the portal images for the small Phase I fields has been found to be an effective way of keeping a record of the MLC field patterns used. Incorporation of the distribution of the setup errors into the planning system also gives a clearer picture of how the prescribed dose was delivered. This information can be useful in dose-escalation studies in determining the relationship between the local control or morbidity rates and prescribed dose.     

The University of Florida frameless high-precision stereotactic radiotherapy system

PURPOSE: To develop and test a system for high precision fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy that separates immobilization and localization devices. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patient localization is achieved through detection and digital registration of an independent bite plate system. The bite plate is made and linked to a set of six infrared light emitting diodes (IRLEDs). These IRLEDs are detected by an infrared camera system that identifies the position of each IRLED within 0.1 to 0.15 mm. Calibration of the camera system defines isocenter and translational X, Y, and Z axes of the stereotactic radiosurgery subsystem and thereby digitally defines the virtual treatment room space in a computer linked to the camera system. Positions of the bite plate's IRLEDs are processed digitally using a computer algorithm so that positional differences between an actual bite plate position and a desired position can be resolved within 0.1 mm of translation (X, Y, and Z distance) and 0.1 degree of rotation. Furthermore, bite plate misalignment can be displayed digitally in real time with translational (x, y, and z) and rotational (roll, pitch, and yaw) parameters for an actual bite plate position. Immobilization is achieved by a custom head mold and thermal plastic mask linked by hook-and-loop fastener tape. The head holder system permits rotational and translational movements for daily treatment positioning based on the bite plate localization system. Initial testing of the localization system was performed on 20 patients treated with radiosurgery. The system was used to treat 11 patients with fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy. RESULTS: Assessment of bite plate localization in radiosurgery patients revealed that the patient's bite plate could be positioned and repositioned within 0.5 +/- 0.3 mm (standard deviation). After adjustments, the first 11 patients were treated with the bite plate repositioning error reduced to 0.2 +/- 0.1 mm. CONCLUSIONS: High precision stereotactic radiotherapy can be delivered using separate localization and immobilization systems. Treatment setup and delivery can be accomplished in 15 min or less. Advantages compared with standard systems require further study.     

Growth performance of pigs subjected to multiple concurrent environmental stressors

PURPOSE: To assess the accuracy of a conventional simulation procedure in radiotherapy of age-related macular degeneration. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A computed tomographic (CT) extension attached to the treatment simulator was used to acquire CT images immediately after conventional simulation in 18 patients referred for treatment of age-related macular degeneration. Analysis was performed on 16 one-sided treatment cases for whom images were obtained. Error was estimated by the displacement between the observed treatment isocenter and the intended isocenter based on reconstructed eye geometry. RESULTS: Based on single slice measurements, the mean error amplitude was 2.3 mm (range 0.2-5.6). Based on three-dimensional eye globe reconstruction, the mean error amplitude was 2.8 mm (range 0.8-5.3). An incidental finding previously unreported was the lower image quality at the center of the simulator-CT image acquisition field. CONCLUSIONS: Small but significant errors from conventional simulation were noted. The integrated simulation-CT procedure may help correct the errors to improve the accuracy of simulation setup. The lower image quality at the center of image acquisition field requires adaptation of the simulation-CT procedure.     

A generalized film technique for the verification of vertex fields used in the treatment of brain tumors

With the availability of commercial three-dimensional (3D)-treatment planning systems, more and more treatment plans call for the use of noncoplanar conformal beams for the treatment of brain tumors. However, techniques for the verification of many noncoplaner beams, such as vertex fields which involve any combination of gantry, collimator, and table angles, do not exist. The purpose of this work is to report on the results of an algorithm and a technique that have been developed for the verification of noncoplanar vertex fields used in the treatment of brain tumors. This technique is applicable to any geometric orientation of the beam, i.e., a beam orientation that consists of any combination of gantry, table, and collimator rotations. The method consists of superimposing a central plane image of a correctly magnified vertex field on a lateral or oblique field port film. To achieve this, the 3D coordinates of the projection of the isocenter onto the film for lateral (or oblique) as well as the vertex fields are determined and then appropriately matched. Coordinate transformation equations have been developed that enable this matching precisely. A film holder has been designed such that a film cassette can be secured rigidly along the side rails of the treatment table. The technique for taking a patient treatment setup verification film consists of two steps. In the first step, the gantry, table, and collimator angles for the lateral (or oblique) field are set and the usual double exposures are made; the first exposure corresponds to that of the treatment portal with the isocenter clearly identified and the second one a larger radiation field so that the peripheral anatomy is visible on the film. In the next step, the gantry, table, and collimator angles are positioned for the vertex field and the table is moved laterally and vertically and the film longitudinally to a position that will enable precise matching of the isocenter on the film. A third exposure is then taken with the vertex portal. What is seen on the film is a superposition of a central plane image of the vertex field onto the image of the lateral or oblique field. This technique has been used on 60 patients treated with noncoplanar fields for brain tumors. In all of these cases, the coincidence of the projection of the isocenter for the lateral (or oblique) and the vertex fields was found to be within 3 mm.     

A new technique for positioning tangential fields

PURPOSE: A technique that eliminates the use of a mechanical "breast-bridge" for positioning tangential fields for treatment of the intact breast or chest wall has been developed. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Treatment set-up parameters are determined using measuring capabilities (gantry angles and source-skin distances) available on a standard simulator unit. A programmable scientific calculator is used to determine field geometry from polar coordinates for various points on the patient's skin. The calculator program determines the field size, a depth and lateral shift from a skin reference point to the isocenter for the tangential fields, and the gantry angles. The program provides additional information which facilitates the simulation process: First, the coordinates of the isocenter for the tangential fields are expressed relative to couch coordinates for an initial arbitrary isocenter so that the "auto go to" capability available on some simulators can be used. Second, the coordinates of the medial and lateral entry points can be edited when the first set of tangents are not accepted. This part of the program allows quick and efficient adjustment of the fields to obtain adequate treatment volume coverage and a minimum of irradiated lung or heart. RESULTS: Simulation of more than 300 patients has shown the technique to be a practical and efficient method for positioning tangential fields for breast or chest wall irradiation. CONCLUSION: The technique described here takes full advantage of the capabilities of the new generation of computer controlled simulators, and offers an alternative to previous methods employing a mechanical "breast-bridge."     

Whole-body positron emission tomography in clinical oncology: comparison between attenuation-corrected and uncorrected images

The clinical need for attenuation correction of whole-body positron emission tomography (PET) images is controversial, especially because of the required increase in imaging time. In this study, regional tracer distribution in attenuation-corrected and uncorrected images was compared in order to delineate the potential advantages of attenuation correction for clinical application. An ECAT EXACT scanner and a protocol including five to seven bed positions, emission scans of 9 min and post-injection transmission scans of 10 min per bed position were used. Uncorrected and attenuation-corrected images were reconstructed by filtered backprojection. In total, 109 areas of focal fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake in 34 patients undergoing PET for the staging of malignancies were analysed. To measure focus contrast, a ratio of focus (target) to background average countrates (t/b ratio) was obtained from transaxial slices using a region of interest technique. Calculation of focus diameters by a distance measurement tool and visual determination of focus borders were performed. In addition, images of a body phantom with spheres to simulate focal FDG uptake were acquired. Transmission scans with and without radioactivity in the phantom were used with increasing transmission scanning times (2-30 min). The t/b ratios of the spheres were calculated and compared for the different imaging protocols. In patients, the t/b ratio was significantly higher for uncorrected images than for attenuation-corrected images (5.0+/-3.6 vs 3.1+/-1.4; P<0.001). This effect was independent of focus localization, tissue type and distance to body surface. Compared with the attenuation-corrected images, foci in uncorrected images showed larger diameters in the anterior-posterior dimension (27+/-14 vs 23+/-12 mm; P<0.001) but smaller diameters in the left-right dimension (19+/-11 vs 21+/-11 mm; P<0.001). Phantom data confirmed higher contrast in uncorrected images compared with attenuation-corrected images. It is concluded that, although distortion of foci was demonstrated, uncorrected images provided higher contrast for focal FDG uptake independent of tumour localization. In most clinical situations, the main issue of whole-body PET is pure lesion detection with the highest contrast possible, and not quantification of tracer uptake. The present data suggest that attenuation correction may not be necessary for this purpose.     

Feasibility of cardiac cryoablation using a transvenous steerable electrode catheter

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Accurate contouring of the clinical target volume (CTV) is a fundamental prerequisite for successful conformal radiotherapy of prostate cancer. The purpose of this study was to investigate intra- and inter-observer variability in contouring prostate (P) and seminal vesicles (SV) and its impact on conformal treatment planning in our working conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Inter-observer variability was investigated by asking five well-trained radiotherapists of contouring on CT images the P and the SV of six supine-positioned patients previously treated with conformal techniques. Short-term intra-observer variability was assessed by asking the radiotherapists to contour the P and SV of one patient for a second time, just after the first contouring. The differences among the inserted volumes were considered for both intra- and inter-observer variability. Regarding intra-observer variability, the differences between the two inserted contours were estimated by taking the relative differences in correspondence to the CT slices on BEV plots (antero-posterior and left-right beams). Concerning inter-observer variability, the distances between the internal and external envelopes of the inserted contours (named projected diagnostic uncertainties or PDUs) and the distances from the mean inserted contours (named mean contour distances or MCDs) were measured from BEV plots (i.e. parallel to the CT slices). RESULTS: Intra-observer variability was relatively small (the average percentage variation of the volume was approximately 5%; SD of the differences measured on BEV plots within 1.8 mm). Concerning inter-observer variability, the percentage SD of the inserted volumes ranged from 10 to 18%. Differences equal to 1 cm in the cranio-caudal extension of P + SV were found in four out of six patients. The largest inter-observer variability was found when considering the anterior margin in the left-right beam of P top (MCD = 7.1 mm, 1 SD). Relatively high values for MCDs were also found for P bottom, for the posterior and lateral margins of P top (2.6 and 3.1 mm, respectively, I SD) and for the anterior margin of SV (2.8 mm, 1 SD). Relatively small values were found for P central (from 1.4 to 2.0 mm, 1 SD) and the posterior margin of SV (1.5 mm, 1 SD). CONCLUSIONS: The application of larger margins taking inter-observer variability into account should be taken into consideration for the anterior and the lateral margins of SV and P top and for the lateral margin of P. The impact of short-term intra-observer variability does not seem to be relevant.     

Clinical use of on-line portal imaging for daily patient treatment verification

PURPOSE: To determine the ease of use by clinical staff and reliability of an electronic portal imaging system and evaluate the potential to utilize on-line imaging to assess accuracy of daily patient treatment positioning in radiation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A computer controlled fluorescent screen-mirror imaging system was used to acquire on-line portal images. A physician panel assessed on-line image quality relative to standard portal film. Clinical use of the imager was implemented through a protocol where images were obtained during the first six monitor units of external beam. The images were visually compared to a reference portal and patient setup was adjusted for errors exceeding 5 mm. Subsequent off-line analysis was utilized to give insight into the magnitude of clinical setup error in the visually accepted images. RESULTS: Physician evaluation of on-line image quality with an initial 211 images found that 70% were comparable or superior to standard film portal images. Eighty percent of treatment fields fit completely within the on-line imaging area. Eight percent of on-line images were rejected due to poor image quality. Twelve percent of the daily treatment setups imaged required adjustment overall, but specific field types predictably required more frequent adjustment (pelvic and mantle fields). Off-line analysis of accepted images demonstrates that 18% of the final images had setup errors exceeding 5 mm. CONCLUSION: On-line imaging facilitated daily portal alignment and verification. Ease of use, almost instantaneous viewing and consistent ability to identify and locate anatomical landmarks imply the potential for on-line imaging to replace film based approaches. Retrospective analysis of daily images reveals that visual assessment of setup is not sufficient for eliminating localization errors. Further improvement is required with respect to detecting localization error and fully encompassing larger field sizes.     

Exercise and cellular innate immune function

PURPOSE: To determine, in three-dimensions, the difference between prostate delineation in magnetic resonance (MR) and computer tomography (CT) images for radiotherapy treatment planning. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three radiation oncologists, considered experts in the field, outlined the prostate without seminal vesicles both on CT, and axial, coronal, and sagittal MR images for 18 patients. To compare the resulting delineated prostates, the CT and MR scans were matched in three-dimensions using chamfer matching on bony structures. The volumes were measured and the interscan and interobserver variation was determined. The spatial difference between delineation in CT and MR (interscan variation) as well as the interobserver variation were quantified and mapped three-dimensionally (3D) using polar coordinates. A urethrogram was performed and the location of the tip of the dye column was compared with the apex delineated in CT and MR images. RESULTS: Interscan variation: CT volumes were larger than the axial MR volumes in 52 of 54 delineations. The average ratio between the CT and MR volumes was 1.4 (standard error of mean, SE: 0.04) which was significantly different from 1 (p < 0.005). Only small differences were observed between the volumes outlined in the various MR scans, although the coronal MR volumes were smallest. The CT derived prostate was 8 mm (standard deviation, SD: 6 mm) larger at the base of the seminal vesicles and 6 mm (SD 4 mm) larger at the apex of the prostate than the axial MRI. Similar figures were obtained for the CT and the other MRI scans. Interobserver variation: The average ratio between the volume derived by one observer for a particular scan and patient and the average volume was 0.95, 0.97, and 1.08 (SE 0.01) for the three observers, respectively. The 3D pattern of the overall observer variation (1 SD) for CT and axial MRI was similar and equal to 3.5 to 2.8 mm at the base of the seminal vesicles and 3 mm at the apex. CONCLUSION: CT-derived prostate volumes are larger than MR derived volumes, especially toward the seminal vesicles and the apex of the prostate. This interscan variation was found to be larger than the interobserver variation. Using MRI for delineation of the prostate reduces the amount of irradiated rectal wall, and could reduce rectal and urological complications.     

The use of adaptive radiation therapy to reduce setup error: a prospective clinical study

PURPOSE: Adaptive Radiation Therapy (ART) is a feedback treatment process that optimizes a patient's treatment according to the patient specific information measured during the course of treatment. Utilizing an electronic portal imaging device (EPID) and a computer-controlled multileaf collimator (MLC), the ART process is currently being implemented in our clinic to improve the treatment accuracy by compensating for the treatment setup error. A prospective study was conducted to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of the ART process for clinical use. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The prospective study included 20 patients who underwent conventional radiotherapy on a linear accelerator equipped with an EPID and a MLC. No specific changes were made in the routine clinical procedures except daily portal images were obtained for each treatment field. Two-dimensional setup error for each treatment field was then measured offline using a software tool. The measured setup errors from initial treatment days were used to predict the systematic and random setup errors for each treatment field. An adjustment decision was made if the predicted systematic error was larger than or equal to 2 mm. Furthermore, the treatment field was extended if the predicted random setup error could not be effectively compensated by the predefined treatment setup margin. Instead of the conventional approach of patient repositioning, setup adjustment was implemented by reshaping the MLC field. The entire process from measuring setup error to reshaping the MLC field was performed offline through a computer network. After completion of a patient's treatment, the systematic and random setup errors after adjustment were compared with those predicted prior to the adjustment. The accuracy of the adjustment, and the reliability and stability of the process were analyzed. RESULTS: Treatment fields of 13 patients were modified to correct for systematic errors. The mean systematic error was 4 mm with a range of 2 to 7 mm before adjustment. It was reduced to 0.5 mm with a range of 0.2 to 1.4 mm after adjustment. There was no significant difference in random setup errors before and after adjustment. The ART process was found to be stable, as more than 95% of patient specific setup margins were predictable within 1 mm using the first four to nine fractions of treatment, confirming the feasibility of treatment plan reoptimization with the ART process. CONCLUSIONS: The prospective study demonstrates that the ART process can be effectively implemented in routine clinical practice to improve treatment accuracy. This process is also ready to be further extended to reoptimize the treatment plan by incorporating the predicted patient specific setup variation.     

Glass transition temperatures of dental porcelains determined by DSC measurement

The dosimetric data on tissue maximum ratios (TMR), output factors, off axis ratios and beam profiles are presented for small circular fields of diameters ranging from 12.5 to 40 mm for 6 MV radiosurgery beam. It is noticed that dmax increases as the collimator field size increases. Comparison of our data with the published TMR and output factors of similar small circular fields shows that our values are higher than those data. Similarities in trend are noticed with the published isodose volumes for 1-5 and 10 arcs. Not much variation is seen beyond two arcs for 80% isodose volumes for all the field sizes. The variation is small in 20% isodose volumes beyond three arcs. Variations are noticed in 5% isodose volumes for 12.5 mm diameter collimated beam. Our experience has been exclusively with malignant neoplasms. An ideal target volume is covered by 80% isodose volume with 3-4 arcs and a single isocenter. Sixteen patients have been treated to date at our institution, including one patient with brain metastases, two patients with meningiomas, one patient with lymphoma and 12 patients with astrocytomas. The majority of tumors have been treated with single isocenter but some as large as 7 cm have been treated safely with two isocenters.     

The outcome of operatively treated anterior cruciate ligament disruptions in the skeletally immature child

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of transphyseal ligament reconstruction in skeletally immature children with midsubstance anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) disruption. Five consecutive patients (mean age, 12.9 years; range, 8 to 14 years) with radiographically documented "wide" open growth plates and a minimum of 5 cm of expected remaining growth, underwent intra-articular reconstruction of the ACL. Operative treatment included three ACL reconstructions using hamstring tendons and two with quadriceps patellar tendon. All involved a centrally placed 6-mm or smaller tibial drill hole through an open physis and graft placement in an over-the-top position on the femur. At an average follow-up of 7.4 years (range, 4.5 to 9.9 years), no patient had a positive anterior drawer, Lachman, or pivot shift test. On KT-1000 arthrometer testing, all patients had 3 mm or less of increased anterior-posterior displacement (mean +/- SD = 1.0 +/- 1.6 mm). Magnetic resonance imaging showed that four tibial physes had fused in a symmetric fashion and one was still open. Orthoroentgenograms showed that no patient had a significant leg length discrepancy (-0.8 mm +/- 3.4 mm). The mean increase in height postoperatively was 17.7 cm (range, 7.6 to 31.0 cm). Overall, using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) evaluation form, there were four patients with grade A and one with grade C. The one patient with a poor IKDC grade had sustained a subsequent patellar dislocation with osteochondral fracture. In conclusion, ACL reconstruction using small drill holes placed through open tibial physes does not seem to adversely affect outcome or future growth.     

Shape Setup System for 1700 Hot Strip Mill

 Shape setup (SSU) system is the core technology for hot strip mill (HSM). A precise SSU system was used to improve the strip quality for HSM. The function of SSU, setup, and feedback was introduced. The main mathematical models of roll gap profile and longitudinal strain difference are set up. Strip profile allocation strategy was researched according to the SSU system of a domestic 1 700 mm HSM. The SSU system was put into practical use and the measurement results showed that strip flatness variation and strip profile variation could be controlled in target scope.     

New system for linear accelerator radiosurgery with a gantry-mounted video camera

PURPOSE: We developed a positioning method that does not depend on the positioning mechanism originally annexed to the linac and investigated the positioning errors of the system. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A small video camera was placed at a location optically identical to the linac x-ray source. A target pointer comprising a convex lens and bull's eye was attached to the arc of the Leksell stereotactic system so that the lens would form a virtual image of the bull's eye (virtual target) at the position of the center of the arc. The linac gantry and target pointer were placed at the side and top to adjust the arc center to the isocenter by referring the virtual target. Coincidence of the target and the isocenter could be confirmed in any combination of the couch and gantry rotation. In order to evaluate the accuracy of the positioning, a tungsten ball was attached to the stereotactic frame as a simulated target, which was repeatedly localized and repositioned to estimate the magnitude of the error. The center of the circular field defined by the collimator was marked on the film. RESULTS: The differences between the marked centers of the circular field and the centers of the shadow of the simulated target were less than 0.3 mm.