首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
Given a set of n intervals representing an interval graph, the problem of finding a maximum matching between pairs of disjoint (nonintersecting) intervals has been considered in the sequential model. In this paper we present parallel algorithms for computing maximum cardinality matchings among pairs of disjoint intervals in interval graphs in the EREW PRAM and hypercube models. For the general case of the problem, our algorithms compute a maximum matching in O( log 3 n) time using O(n/ log 2 n) processors on the EREW PRAM and using n processors on the hypercubes. For the case of proper interval graphs, our algorithm runs in O( log n ) time using O(n) processors if the input intervals are not given already sorted and using O(n/ log n ) processors otherwise, on the EREW PRAM. On n -processor hypercubes, our algorithm for the proper interval case takes O( log n log log n ) time for unsorted input and O( log n ) time for sorted input. Our parallel results also lead to optimal sequential algorithms for computing maximum matchings among disjoint intervals. In addition, we present an improved parallel algorithm for maximum matching between overlapping intervals in proper interval graphs. Received November 20, 1995; revised September 3, 1998.  相似文献   

2.
We present parallel algorithms for computing all pair shortest paths in directed graphs. Our algorithm has time complexityO(f(n)/p+I(n)logn) on the PRAM usingp processors, whereI(n) is logn on the EREW PRAM, log logn on the CCRW PRAM,f(n) iso(n 3). On the randomized CRCW PRAM we are able to achieve time complexityO(n 3/p+logn) usingp processors. A preliminary version of this paper was presented at the 4th Annual ACM Symposium on Parallel Algorithms and Architectures, June 1992. Support by NSF Grant CCR 90-20690 and PSC CUNY Awards #661340 and #662478.  相似文献   

3.
In this paper, we present optimal O(log n) time, O(n/log n) processor EREW PRAM parallel algorithms for finding the connected components, cut vertices, and bridges of a permutation graph. We also present an O(log n) time, O(n) processor, CREW PRAM model parallel algorithm for finding a Breadth First Search (BFS) spanning tree of a permutation graph rooted at vertex 1 and use the same to derive an efficient parallel algorithm for the All Pairs Shortest Path problem on permutation graphs.  相似文献   

4.
We present a technique that can be used to obtain efficient parallel geometric algorithms in the EREW PRAM computational model. This technique enables us to solve optimally a number of geometric problems in O(log n) time using O(n/log n) EREW PRAM processors, where n is the input size of a problem. These problems include: computing the convex hull of a set of points in the plane that are given sorted, computing the convex hull of a simple polygon, computing the common intersection of half-planes whose slopes are given sorted, finding the kernel of a simple polygon, triangulating a set of points in the plane that are given sorted, triangulating monotone polygons and star-shaped polygons, and computing the all dominating neighbors of a sequence of values. PRAM algorithms for these problems were previously known to be optimal (i.e., in O(log n) time and using O(n/log n) processors) only on the CREW PRAM, which is a stronger model than the EREW PRAM  相似文献   

5.
By restricting weight functions to satisfy the quadrangle inequality or the inverse quadrangle inequality, significant progress has been made in developing efficient sequential algorithms for the least-weight subsequence problem [10], [9], [12], [16]. However, not much is known on the improvement of the naive parallel algorithm for the problem, which is fast but demands too many processors (i.e., it takesO(log2 n) time on a CREW PRAM with n3/logn processors). In this paper we show that if the weight function satisfies the inverse quadrangle inequality, the problem can be solved on a CREW PRAM in O(log2 n log logn) time withn/log logn processors, or in O(log2 n) time withn logn processors. Notice that the processor-time complexity of our algorithm is much closer to the almost linear-time complexity of the best-known sequential algorithm [12].  相似文献   

6.
We consider the following problem. For a binary tree T = (V, E) where V = {1, 2, ..., n}, given its inorder traversal and either its preorder or its postorder traversal, reconstruct the binary tree. We present a new parallel algorithm for this problem. Our algorithm requires O(n) space. The main idea of our algorithm is to reduce the reconstruction process to merging two sorted sequences. With the best parallel merging algorithms, our algorithm can be implemented in O(log log n) time using O(n/log log n) processors on the CREW PRAM (or in O(log n) time using O(n/log n) processors on the EREW PRAM). Our result provides one more example of a fundamental problem which can be solved by optimal parallel algorithms in O(log log n)time on the CREW PRAM.  相似文献   

7.
In the literature, there are quite a few sequential and parallel algorithms for solving problems on distance-hereditary graphs. With an n-vertex and m-edge distance-hereditary graph G, we show that the efficient domination problem on G can be solved in O(log/sup 2/ n) time using O(n + m) processors on a CREW PRAM. Moreover, if a binary tree representation of G is given, the problem can be optimally solved in O(log n) time using O(n/log n) processors on an EREW PRAM.  相似文献   

8.
We consider the following partition problem: Given a set S of n elements that is organized as k sorted subsets of size n/k each and given a parameter h with 1/k ≤ h ≤ n/k , partition S into g = O(n/(hk)) subsets D 1 , D 2 , . . . , D g of size Θ(hk) each, such that, for any two indices i and j with 1 ≤ i < j ≤ g , no element in D i is bigger than any element in D j . Note that with various combinations of the values of parameters h and k , several fundamental problems, such as merging, sorting, and finding an approximate median, can be formulated as or be reduced to this partition problem. The partition problem also finds many applications in solving problems of parallel computing and computational geometry. In this paper we present efficient parallel algorithms for solving the partition problem and a number of its applications. Our parallel partition algorithm runs in O( log n) time using processors in the EREW PRAM model. The complexity bounds of our parallel partition algorithm on the respective special cases match those of the optimal EREW PRAM algorithms for merging, sorting, and finding an approximate median. Using our parallel partition algorithm, we are also able to obtain better complexity bounds (even possibly on a weaker parallel model) than the previously best known parallel algorithms for several important problems, including parallel multiselection, parallel multiranking, and parallel sorting of k sorted subsets. Received May 5, 1996; revised July 30, 1998.  相似文献   

9.
We present an optimal parallel algorithm for the single-source shortest path problem for permutation graphs. The algorithm runs in O(log n) time using O(n/log n) processors on an EREW PRAM. As an application, we show that a minimum connected dominating set in a permutation graph can be found in O(log n) time using O(n/log n) processors.  相似文献   

10.
We present a randomized EREW PRAM algorithm to find a minimum spanning forest in a weighted undirected graph. On an n -vertex graph the algorithm runs in o(( log n) 1+ ɛ ) expected time for any ɛ >0 and performs linear expected work. This is the first linear-work, polylog-time algorithm on the EREW PRAM for this problem. This also gives parallel algorithms that perform expected linear work on two general-purpose models of parallel computation—the QSM and the BSP.  相似文献   

11.
We consider the problem of sorting n integers when the elements are drawn from the restricted domain [1...n]. A new deterministic parallel algorithm for sorting n integers is obtained. Its running time is O(lognlog(n/logn)) using n/logn processors on EREW (exclusive read exclusive write) PRAM (parallel random access machine). Also, our algorithm was modified to become optimal when we use processors. This algorithm belongs to class EP (Efficient, Polynomial fast).  相似文献   

12.
In this paper we consider the problem of computing the connected components of the complement of a given graph. We describe a simple sequential algorithm for this problem, which works on the input graph and not on its complement, and which for a graph on n vertices and m edges runs in optimal O(n+m) time. Moreover, unlike previous linear co-connectivity algorithms, this algorithm admits efficient parallelization, leading to an optimal O(log n)-time and O((n+m)log n)-processor algorithm on the EREW PRAM model of computation. It is worth noting that, for the related problem of computing the connected components of a graph, no optimal deterministic parallel algorithm is currently available. The co-connectivity algorithms find applications in a number of problems. In fact, we also include a parallel recognition algorithm for weakly triangulated graphs, which takes advantage of the parallel co-connectivity algorithm and achieves an O(log2 n) time complexity using O((n+m2) log n) processors on the EREW PRAM model of computation.  相似文献   

13.

This paper presents an optimal sequential and an optimal parallel algorithm to compute a minimum cardinality Steiner set and a Steiner tree. The sequential algorithm takes O ( n ) time and parallel algorithm takes O (log n ) time and O ( n /log n ) processors on an EREW PRAM model.  相似文献   

14.
We present a unified parallel algorithm for constructing various search trees. The tree construction is based on a unified scheme, called bottom-level balancing, which constructs a perfectly balanced search tree having a uniform distribution of keys. The algorithm takes O(log log N) time using N/log log N processors on the EREW PRAM model, and O(1) time with N processors on the CREW PRAM model, where N is the number of keys in the tree.  相似文献   

15.
Abstract. We present an optimal parallel randomized algorithm for the Voronoi diagram of a set of n nonintersecting (except possibly at endpoints) line segments in the plane. Our algorithm runs in O(log n) time with high probability using O(n) processors on a CRCW PRAM. This algorithm is optimal in terms of work done since the sequential time bound for this problem is Ω(n log n) . Our algorithm improves by an O(log n) factor the previously best known deterministic parallel algorithm, given by Goodrich, ó'Dúnlaing, and Yap, which runs in O( log 2 n) time using O(n) processors. We obtain this result by using a new ``two-stage' random sampling technique. By choosing large samples in the first stage of the algorithm, we avoid the hurdle of problem-size ``blow-up' that is typical in recursive parallel geometric algorithms. We combine the two-stage sampling technique with efficient search and merge procedures to obtain an optimal algorithm. This technique gives an alternative optimal algorithm for the Voronoi diagram of points as well (all other optimal parallel algorithms for this problem use the transformation to three-dimensional half-space intersection).  相似文献   

16.
Das  Loui 《Algorithmica》2008,31(4):530-547
Abstract. Updating a minimum spanning tree (MST) is a basic problem for communication networks. In this paper we consider single node deletions in MSTs. Let G=(V,E) be an undirected graph with n nodes and m edges, and let T be the MST of G . For each node v in V , the node replacement for v is the minimum weight set of edges R(v) that connect the components of T-v . We present a sequential algorithm and a parallel algorithm that find R(v) for all V simultaneously. The sequential algorithm takes O(m log n) time, but only O(m α (m,n)) time when the edges of E are presorted by weight. The parallel algorithm takes O(log 2 n) time using m processors on a CREW PRAM.  相似文献   

17.
在EREW PRAM(exclusive-read and exclusive-write parallel random access machine)并行计算模型上,对范围很广的一类无向图的边极大匹配问题,给出时间复杂性为O(logn),使用O((n+m)/logn)处理器的最佳、高速并行算法.  相似文献   

18.
Parallel algorithms for the problems of selection and searching on sorted matrices are formulated. The selection algorithm takesO(lognlog lognlog*n) time withO(n/lognlog*n) processors on an EREW PRAM. This algorithm can be generalized to solve the selection problem on a set of sorted matrices. The searching algorithm takesO(log logn) time withO(n/log logn) processors on a Common CRCW PRAM, which is optimal. We show that no algorithm using at mostnlogcnprocessors,c≥ 1, can solve the matrix search problem in time faster than Ω(log logn) and that Ω(logn) steps are needed to solve this problem on any model that does not allow concurrent writes.  相似文献   

19.
Thek-compaction problem arises whenk out ofn cells in an array are non-empty and the contents of these cells must be moved to the firstk locations in the array. Parallel algorithms fork-compaction have obvious applications in processor allocation and load balancing;k-compaction is also an important subroutine in many recently developed oped parallel algorithms. We show that any EREW PRAM that solves thek-compaction problem requires time, even if the number of processors is arbitrarily large andk=2. On the CREW PRAM, we show that everyn-processor algorithm fork-compaction problem requires (log logn) time, even ifk=2. Finally, we show thatO(logk) time can be achieved on the ROBUST PRAM, a very weak CRCW PRAM model.  相似文献   

20.
We present a parallel algorithm for finding the convex hull of a sorted planar point set. Our algorithm runs in O(log n) time using O(n/log n) processors in the CREW PRAM computational model, which is optimal. One of the techniques we use to achieve these optimal bounds is the use of a parallel data structure which we call the hull tree.  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号