Therapeutic efficacy of multiple intravenous infusions of anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha monoclonal antibody combined with low-dose weekly methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and safety of multiple infusions of a chimeric monoclonal anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha antibody (cA2) (infliximab; Remicade, Centocor, Malvern, PA) given alone or in combination with low-dose methotrexate (MTX) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. METHODS: In a 26-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial, 101 patients with active RA exhibiting an incomplete response or flare of disease activity while receiving low-dose MTX were randomized to 1 of 7 groups of 14-15 patients each. The patients received either intravenous cA2 at 1, 3, or 10 mg/kg, with or without MTX 7.5 mg/week, or intravenous placebo plus MTX 7.5 mg/week at weeks 0, 2, 6, 10, and 14 and were followed up through week 26. RESULTS: Approximately 60% of patients receiving cA2 at 3 or 10 mg/kg with or without MTX achieved the 20% Paulus criteria for response to treatment, for a median duration of 10.4 to >18.1 weeks (P < 0.001 versus placebo). Patients receiving cA2 at 1 mg/kg without MTX became unresponsive to repeated infusions of cA2 (median duration 2.6 weeks; P=0.126 versus placebo). However, coadministration of cA2 at 1 mg/kg with MTX appeared to be synergistic, prolonging the duration of the 20% response in >60% of patients to a median of 16.5 weeks (P < 0.001 versus placebo; P=0.006 versus no MTX) and the 50% response to 12.2 weeks (P < 0.001 versus placebo; P=0.002 versus no MTX). Patients receiving placebo infusions plus suboptimal low-dose MTX continued to have active disease, with a Paulus response lasting a median of 0 weeks. A 70-90% reduction in the swollen joint count, tender joint count, and C-reactive protein level was maintained for the entire 26 weeks in patients receiving 10 mg/kg of cA2 with MTX. In general, treatment was well tolerated and stable blood levels of cA2 were achieved in all groups, except for the group receiving 1 mg/kg of cA2 alone, at which dosage antibodies to cA2 were observed in approximately 50% of the patients. CONCLUSION: Multiple infusions of cA2 were effective and well tolerated, with the best results occurring at 3 and 10 mg/kg either alone or in combination with MTX in approximately 60% of patients with active RA despite therapy with low-dose MTX. When cA2 at 1 mg/kg was given with low-dose MTX, synergy was observed. The results of the trial provide a strategy for further evaluation of the efficacy and safety of longer-term treatment with cA2.     

Selective expression and functions of interleukin 18 receptor on T helper (Th) type 1 but not Th2 cells

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate tolerability and efficacy of combination therapy with methotrexate (MTX)/parenteral gold or MTX/other disease modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD, d-penicillamine or chloroquine) in comparison with MTX monotherapy in patients with longstanding destructive active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: In an open prospective trial all consecutive MTX-naive patients with active RA starting MTX treatment alone or in combination between January 1980 and December 1987, after failing one or more DMARD, were followed at regular intervals up to 108 months. Evaluations included the number of swollen joints (0-32), grip strength, patient assessment of pain and mobility, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), and hemoglobin. Group 1, treated with MTX monotherapy (n = 97), was compared with Group 2, with combination therapy MTX/parenteral gold (n = 126) and Group 3 with MTX + other DMARD (n = 48). RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the groups in mean age (59/57/56 yrs), disease duration (9.6/7.7/8.3 yrs), seropositivity (80/88/82%), or ACR anatomical disease stage (2/3 in stage III and IV). The number of swollen joints (16.8/19.3/16.1 of 32) and the CRP (4.4/5.1/4.7 mg/dl) was significantly greater in Group 2; other disease activity variables were not significantly different. The mean MTX dose at baseline (mostly parenteral) was 16.8/17.0/12.8 mg and could be reduced to around 12 mg (predominantly oral) in the 3 groups. Frequency of adverse events (80/83/88%), nature of clinical (nausea, hair loss, stomatitis) and laboratory (liver enzyme elevation, slight proteinuria) side effects, and withdrawal rate for side effects (20.6/15.0/12.5%) were not significantly different between the groups. After 5 years 54/54/80% of patients continued their treatment. All efficacy variables improved significantly (p < 0.001) in all groups without significant intergroup difference. Improvement > 50% in the ESR was achieved in 63/68/41% and in the swollen joint count in 70/85/48% of patients after 3 years. The number of patients taking oral steroids decreased from 63/59/65% to 22/31/48% after 3 years. In half the patients hemoglobin increased by at least 1 g/dl. CONCLUSION: Combination therapy of MTX with parenteral gold or other DMARD is effective in reducing clinical and biochemical disease activity in patients with longstanding destructive RA with no greater risk of toxicity compared with MTX alone; our study however, did not show clear advantages of combination therapy versus monotherapy for effectiveness.     

Cyclosporine A in the treatment of early rheumatoid arthritis. A prospective, randomized 24-month study

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy, tolerability and safety of cyclosporine A (CSA) in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. METHODS: Patients with an early diagnosis of RA, a disease duration of less than 3 years, and without prior disease modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) treatment were studied. They randomly received oral CSA (3 mg/kg/day) or oral methotrexate (MTX) (0.15 mg/kg/week). In addition, all patients in both groups received oral prednisone (7.5 mg/day). RESULTS: Fifty-two patients were assigned to the CSA group and 51 to the MTX group. After 24 months of treatment, 48 patients from the CSA group and 48 from the MTX group showed significant clinical improvement. This was evaluated by the duration of morning stiffness, grip strength, the total joint count, joint swelling, and joint tenderness and pain, compared to pre-treatment values. The clinical improvement was also associated with a significant decrease in ESR and CRP values in both groups. No significant radiological deterioration was observed in the CSA patients compared to those treated with MTX after 24 months. Four patients from the CSA group dropped out of the study, two because of a synovitis flare, one because of severe hypertrichosis and one because of severe gingival hyperplasia. Three patients from the MTX group withdrew, one because of disease flare-up and two because of gastrointestinal disturbances. CONCLUSION: Early immunointervention in RA patients appears to be crucial to limit the development of joint damage. Cyclosporine A appears to be effective, well tolerated and safe in the long-term treatment of RA and can therefore be used as a first immunomodulatory drug in the armamentarium for the treatment of RA.     

Salsalate, a nonacetylated salicylate, is as efficacious as diclofenac in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Salsalate-Diclofenac Study Group

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy of salsalate, a nonacetylated salicylate, in the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Three hundred and one patients meeting the ACR criteria for RA were drawn from 16 centers. After withdrawal of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAID) and subsequent flare, patients were randomized to receive either salsalate or diclofenac for 8 weeks, according to a double blind, double dummy protocol. Initial doses of salsalate 3.0 g/day and diclofenac 75 mg/day were titrated for the first 5 weeks. The primary outcome measure was a multivariate analysis at 8 weeks of tender joint count, pain, visual analog scale score, and physician's global assessment. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety patients completed the study. The mean stabilized dose of salsalate was 3.55 g/day, and that of diclofenac 112 mg/day. Discontinuations were due to lack of efficacy (17 salsalate vs 15 diclofenac); adverse events [19 salsalate (mainly tinnitus and hearing loss; p = 0.0001 and p = 0.04, respectively) vs 9 diclofenac]; laboratory abnormalities (3 salsalate vs 1 diclofenac); and other reasons, including protocol violations, intercurrent illness, and personal factors (24 salsalate vs 23 diclofenac). Both treatments produced significant improvement from flare (p < 0.0001). Post hoc power analysis showed that the study had sufficient power (0.60 to 0.90) to detect clinically important differences between the 2 drugs in the primary outcome measures; however, no statistically significant (p = 0.29) or clinically important treatment differences were recorded. Other than a difference in erythrocyte sedimentation rate that favored salsalate, there were no significant differences in secondary outcome measures between the 2 groups. All outcomes showed a tendency for more improvement with salsalate. CONCLUSION: Salsalate is as efficacious as diclofenac. Salsalate may be considered an alternative to other NSAID in the first line treatment of patients with RA.     

A double-blind comparison of oral versus rectal mesalamine versus combination therapy in the treatment of distal ulcerative colitis

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of mesalamine rectal suspension enema (Rowasa) alone, oral mesalamine tablets (Asacol) alone, and the combination of mesalamine enema and mesalamine tablets in patients with active mild-to-moderate distal ulcerative colitis. METHODS: Sixty outpatients with ulcerative colitis at least 5 cm above the anal verge and not more than 50 cm, inclusive, and a total disease activity index (DAI) score between 4 and 10, inclusive, were randomized to either mesalamine rectal enema (n = 18) once nightly, oral mesalamine 2.4 g/day (n = 22), or a combination of both treatments (n = 20). Placebo capsules and enemas were used to maintain a blind procedure. Total DAI scores and abbreviated DAI scores were evaluated at wk 3 and 6, and wk 1 and 2, respectively. Patients recorded the amount of blood in stools, urgency, straining at stools, and abdominal pain in daily diaries. Physicians and patients rated overall improvement at each visit. RESULTS: At wk 6, combination therapy produced a greater improvement (-5.2) in total DAI scores than did either mesalamine enema (-4.4) or mesalamine tablet (-3.9) therapy alone; similar treatment differences were observed at wk 3. Compared with patients given mesalamine enemas or mesalamine tablets, combination-therapy patients reported an absence of blood in stools significantly sooner and, at all visits, the combination therapy group had the highest percentage of patients who reported no blood in their stools. Physicians' and patients' ratings of improvement indicated that combination therapy significantly improved disease status, compared with mesalamine tablet therapy alone. All treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of oral and rectal mesalamine therapy was well tolerated and produced earlier and more complete relief of rectal bleeding than oral or rectal therapy alone.     

Methotrexate therapy in rheumatoid arthritis: a life table review of 587 patients treated in community practice

To determine whether methotrexate (MTX) maintains its effectiveness in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in the setting of community based private rheumatology practice we used life table analysis to review the combined experience of a group of these practices. Of 587 patients with RA who started to take MTX, total termination rate at 70 months was 24.4% with most terminations prompted by drug toxicity. Older age (greater than 65 years) was associated with higher rates of toxicity. Treatment termination rates varied substantially between rheumatologists. We conclude that MTX therapy for RA is well tolerated and maintains effectiveness for at least 70 months.     

T cell receptor peptide vaccination in rheumatoid arthritis: a placebo-controlled trial using a combination of Vbeta3, Vbeta14, and Vbeta17 peptides

OBJECTIVE: Restricted T cell receptor (TCR) gene usage has been demonstrated in animal models of autoimmune disease and has resulted in the successful use of TCR peptide therapy in animal studies. This clinical trial was undertaken to determine the safety and efficacy of a combination of Vbeta3, Vbeta14, and Vbeta17 TCR peptides in Freund's incomplete adjuvant (IFA) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, phase II clinical trial was undertaken using IR501 therapeutic vaccine, which consists of a combination of 3 peptides derived from TCRs (Vbeta3, Vbeta14, and Vbeta17) in IFA. A total of 99 patients with active RA received either 90 microg (n = 31) or 300 microg (n = 35) of IR501 or IFA alone (n = 33) as a control. The study medication and placebo were administered as a single intramuscular injection (1 ml) at weeks 0, 4, 8, and 20. RESULTS: Treatment with IR501 was safe and well tolerated. None of the patients discontinued the trial because of treatment-related adverse events. Efficacy was measured according to the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria. Using these criteria, patients in both IR501 dosage groups showed improvement in disease activity. In the most conservative analysis used to evaluate efficacy, an intent-to-treat analysis including all patients who enrolled, the 90-microg dosage group showed a statistically significant improvement compared with control patients at the 20-week time point after the third injection. Trends toward improvement were shown in both the 90-microg and the 300-microg dosage groups at week 24 after the fourth injection. CONCLUSION: IR501 therapeutic vaccine therapy was safe and well tolerated, immunogenic, and demonstrated clinical improvement in RA patients. Additional clinical trials are planned to confirm and extend these observations.     

Methotrexate therapy in refractory pediatric onset systemic lupus erythematosus

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and corticosteroid sparing potential of methotrexate (MTX) in patients with pediatric onset systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS: The medical records of 11 patients with SLE with onset before age 16 years were reviewed. Details of clinical features, previous therapy, indications for MTX, efficacy, toxicity, and corticosteroid reduction during MTX therapy were recorded. RESULTS: At the start of MTX treatment, 7 patients had nephritis, 3 malar rash, 3 arthritis, 2 skin vasculitis, and 2 thrombocytopenia. All patients were given MTX (12.5-17.0 mg/m2/week) as the sole drug therapy along with prednisone. Although many patients showed initial improvement and/or were able to reduce the prednisone dose, after 7 to 23 months 8 patients had a flare of SLE requiring increased doses of prednisone, one patient had unchanged SLE activity, and 2 patients were permanently discontinued from MTX because of toxicity. Side effects were observed in 8 (73%) patients, but only 2 (18%) discontinued MTX due to toxicity. CONCLUSION: MTX given as the sole drug therapy along with prednisone did not show a major corticosteroid sparing potential in our patients with pediatric onset SLE.     

Fluoride therapy in prevention of rheumatoid arthritis induced bone loss

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of sodium fluoride (40 mg/day) in preventing rheumatoid arthritis (RA) induced bone loss, which may lead to osteoporosis. METHODS: We conducted an 18 month, randomized, double blind, placebo controlled trial in 38 patients with RA. The primary outcome measure was the difference in the percentage change between groups in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) from baseline values after 18 months of therapy. The secondary outcome measures were the differences in the percentage change between groups in femoral neck, Ward's triangle, trochanter, and total body BMD from baseline after 18 months of therapy. RESULTS: There was a significant percentage difference (SD) between groups of 6.2% (7.3%) (p = 0.0005) in lumbar spine BMD after 18 months of treatment in favor of the fluoride group. The fluoride group experienced a 5.2% (8.4%) (p = 0.0125) increase, whereas the placebo group showed a 1.0% (4.8%) (p = 0.8015) decrease in lumbar spine BMD after treatment. No significant differences were found for the femoral neck, Ward's triangle, trochanter, and total body BMD in terms of the percentage changes from baseline within each treatment group or in the differences in the degree of change between groups after therapy. Lumbar spine BMD increased in about 80% of patients treated with fluoride (responders) compared to 44% of patients treated with placebo. CONCLUSION: The results showed that fluoride therapy was well tolerated and increased vertebral bone mass in patients with RA.     

Long-term follow-up of 453 rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with methotrexate: an open, retrospective, observational study

A total of 453 rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients were followed up for 35.2 +/- 27.9 months (range 3-106). The clinical parameters decreased significantly after 6 months. Twenty-eight patients were in remission (6.4%). Rheumatoid factor (RF) positivity was less common in the group of patients in remission, with a higher frequency of visits and methotrexate (MTX) onset after 65 yr. There was a significant degradation of radiographic lesions (n = 60). A total of 101 patients (23.1%) stopped MTX, for toxicity (n = 61) and failure (n = 20). The onset of MTX after 65 yr, a low number of visits and the occurrence of side-effects were predictive of MTX withdrawal. A total of 259 patients (59.3%) had side-effects. A Ritchie's index < or = 10, a lower polymorphonuclear cell count and the absence of RF were predictive of side-effects. The probability of being on MTX at 5 yr was 73%. This study confirms the high efficacy of MTX in RA.     

How Canadian and US rheumatologists treat moderate or aggressive rheumatoid arthritis: a survey

OBJECTIVE: To determine which second line agents Canadian and US rheumatologists use to treat patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: A one page survey was sent by fax or mail to all 263 members of the Canadian Rheumatology Association and 320 members of the American College of Rheumatology (10% random sample weighted by region) known to practice adult rheumatology. The survey asked for first and second treatment preferences in patients with (1) aggressive RA; (2) moderate RA; and (3) aggressive RA failing a trial of methotrexate (MTX) 25 mg. RESULTS: Altogether 231 (87.8%) Canadian and 230 (71.7%) US rheumatologists responded, and 214 responses in each survey were analyzable. In aggressive RA. MTX was the drug of first choice of most Canadian (68.7%) and US (78.5%) rheumatologists. Intramuscular gold was a drug of first choice for 14.5 and 1.9% of Canadians and Americans, respectively. 93.9% of Canadian and 90.2% of US respondents preferred single agents for the treatment of moderate RA. Among US rheumatologists. no clear leader emerged as a single agent alternative for the management of aggressive RA unresponsive to MTX. Most said they would use combination (38.3%) or triple (23.8%) therapy involving MTX plus sulfasalazine and/or hydroxychloroquine. 52.3% of Canadians preferred single agent therapy, with 34.6% choosing gold as an alternative to MTX. CONCLUSION: Canadian and US rheumatologists preferred MTX for the treatment of aggressive RA. Canadian rheumatologists saw a small but significant role for intramuscular gold. No single agent emerged as a clear alternative to MTX among US rheumatologists.     

Meningeal carcinomatosis in patients with breast carcinoma. Clinical features, prognostic factors, and results of a high-dose intrathecal methotrexate regimen

BACKGROUND: This retrospective study evaluates the results of a regimen of high-dose intrathecal methotrexate and the prognostic factors for the response in patients with meningeal from breast carcinoma. METHODS: From 1979 to 1994, 68 breast carcinoma patients were diagnosed with meningeal carcinomatosis at a mean age of 52 years. All but two had previous metastatic involvement. The proportion of lobular and ductal carcinomas was balanced. Malignant cells were present in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples from 61 patients, whereas the 7 remaining patients had increased CSF protein associated with computerized tomographic scan evidence of meningeal metastases. From 1989, 41 of the patients received a regimen of high-dose intrathecal methotrexate with systemic folinic acid rescue (HD-MTX+FA): intrathecal MTX, 15 mg daily x 5 days, repeated every 2 weeks, and intrathecal hydrocortisone acetate, 125 mg on Day 1, and folinic acid, 10 mg intramuscularly 12 hours after each MTX injection. Systemic treatment and radiation therapy were usually associated. Patients treated before 1988 received intrathecal MTX in conventional doses (15 mg once a week). RESULTS: Clinical objective response, defined as a neurological improvement for at least one month, was achieved in 17 patients (41%) and stabilization in 14 (34%) treated with the HD-MTX+FA regimen. The response rate was significantly higher compared with that of the group treated with the conventional doses (P = 0.03). Median survival was 14 weeks for patients treated with the HD-MTX+FA regimen, compared with 7 weeks for patients who received conventional doses of MTX (P = 0.01). Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was the main toxicity that occurred in 16 16 patients (39%) treated with the HD-MTX+FA regimen, and in 7 patients (33%) treated with conventional doses of MTX. In a univariate analysis, three parameters were singled out as having a favorable prognostic value for response to therapy; controlled systemic disease at diagnosis (P < 0.05), low initial CSF protein level (P < 0.05), and concomitant systemic chemotherapy during intrathecal therapy (P < 0.02). Multivariate analysis was not performed because the sample size was too small. CONCLUSIONS: Although this study was retrospective, the intrathecal HD-MTX+FA regimen appears to be a more efficient strategy than conventional doses of MTX to induce neurologic improvement and perhaps better survival. It should be recommended in combination with systemic chemotherapy for selected patients with meningeal carcinomatosis from breast carcinoma who are likely to benefit from intensive therapy, i.e., patients with a CSF protein level less than 5 g/L and in whom systemic disease has been controlled.     

Hematologic disposition of hydroxychloroquine enantiomers

Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is a racemic antiarthritic agent that has a long half-life (t1/2) in plasma and accumulates in blood cells. To study the relationships between HCQ concentrations in plasma, serum, and whole blood and to determine the optimal blood fraction to use for therapeutic drug monitoring of the drug, we studied the relative distribution of the HCQ enantiomers in various fractions of human blood under in vivo and in vitro conditions. Substantially greater concentrations of both enantiomers were found in serum as compared with plasma because of release via platelet activation. After in vitro incubations of the separated blood cells with HCQ, high concentrations of both enantiomers were found in leukocytes, and low concentrations in erythrocytes and platelets; the R:S ratio in vitro was near unity in all of the cells examined. Unlike the in vitro cellular uptake, the concentrations of HCQ in vivo were significantly lower and stereoselective (R:S ratio = 2). There was almost no drug in the polymorphonuclear cells (PMN) in vivo, despite a substantial uptake in vitro after incubation of separated cells. The enantiomeric (R:S) ratio in the urinary excretion of the enantiomers was significantly correlated with that in plasma. The plasma-protein binding of the enantiomers was stereoselective and complimented the cellular uptake findings; the unbound fraction was dependent on the plasma concentrations of alpha 1-acid glycoprotein, but not albumin. Although concentrations in whole blood correlated well with those in lymphocytes and monocytes (the proposed site of HCQ action), stronger correlations were found between concentrations in serum and in the mononuclear cells.     

Accelerated-interrupted radiation therapy given concurrently with chemotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of multidrug chemotherapy combined with accelerated radiation therapy in the treatment of localized but unresectable non-small cell lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between September 1990 and February 1993, 35 patients with Stage III (15 IIIA & 20 IIIB) non-small cell lung cancer were entered on a protocol using combined accelerated radiation therapy and chemotherapy. Radiation therapy consisted of 55.6 Gy in 30 fractions (1.8 Gy bid for 5 consecutive days given in 3 weeks [total of 15 days], every other week). Chemotherapy consisted of cisplatin (10 mg/m2), vinblastine (4 mg/m2), 6-thioguanine (40 mg bid), and 5-fluorouracil (400 mg/m2 as continuous infusion) given concomitantly with radiation therapy. Approximately 3 weeks following completion of radiation therapy, two cycles of consolidation chemotherapy were given, consisting of two doses of cisplatin (120 mg/m2) 4 weeks apart and six doses of vinblastine (4 mg/m2) given on two consecutive days every other week for 3 weeks. RESULTS: Six patients were still alive at last follow-up; for them the median follow-up time is 47 months (range, 39-55.8). The median survival time is 17.5 months. The 1-, 2-, 3- and 4.5-year survival rates are 69%, 37%, 20% and 17%, respectively. Overall response rate is 63%, with 51.5% partial response and 11.5% complete response rates. Esophagitis occurred as follows: Grade 4 = 0, Grade 3 = 1, Grade 2 = 6, and Grade 1 = 13. No patient developed Grade 3 or 4 acute respiratory toxicity. Significant hematologic toxicity occurred as follows: 37% Grade 3 and 31% Grade 4 leukopenia. Radiation pneumonitis occurred in two patients. DISCUSSION: The regimen tested in this protocol appears to be very well tolerated with minimal pulmonary or esophageal toxicity. This, coupled with the shortened course of radiation therapy and the ability to deliver the combined radiation and chemotherapy portion of the treatment on an outpatient basis most of the time, has made multi-modality treatment for this malignancy much easier and more convenient for patients. In addition, the favorable survival in this group of patients with locally advanced disease is very encouraging and warrants further study.     

Therapy for the maintenance of remission in sixty-five patients with generalized Wegener's granulomatosis. Methotrexate versus trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of low-dose intravenous (IV) methotrexate (MTX; 0.3 mg/kg once weekly), both with and without concomitant prednisone, versus daily oral trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (T/S; 160 mg of trimethoprim + 800 mg of sulfamethoxazole twice a day), with and without prednisone, in maintaining remission in patients with generalized Wegener's granulomatosis (WG). METHODS: In this study, 65 patients with generalized WG whose disease had entered remission with cyclophosphamide (CYC) and prednisone therapy were started on one of the following remission-maintenance regimens: MTX alone (group A; n = 22), T/S alone (group B; n = 24), MTX plus concomitant prednisone (group C; n = 11), and T/S plus concomitant prednisone (group D; n = 8). Clinical, radiographic, and seroimmunologic data were evaluated to assess the efficacy of the 4 regimens and to seek possible predictive factors concerning outcome in each group. RESULTS: Partial or complete remission was maintained in 86% of the patients in group A, but in only 58% of those in group B (P < 0.05). In group C, 91% of patients remained in remission, which is in sharp contrast to group D, in which all patients experienced a relapse after a median of 14.5 months (P < 0.005). Side effects occurred twice as often with MTX (n = 12) as with T/S (n = 6) treatment and could usually be resolved by supplemental folinic acid. Two patients taking MTX and 3 patients taking T/S were withdrawn from the study medication because of side effects. In none of the patients were the adverse effects life threatening. No statistically significant factors predictive of poor outcome emerged in any group. CONCLUSION: Low-dose MTX was found to be superior to T/S for the safe and effective maintenance of remission in patients with generalized WG. The use of concomitant prednisone was not associated with a worse outcome with MTX treatment. Since T/S, especially with concomitant prednisone, seemed to increase the chance of relapse, neither T/S alone nor T/S plus prednisone can be recommended for the maintenance of remission in patients with generalized WG.     

Dose-dense therapy with weekly 1-hour paclitaxel infusions in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of paclitaxel administered as a 1-hour infusion on weekly basis, without interruption, to patients with metastatic breast cancer who had received prior therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty patients with metastatic breast cancer received sustained weekly paclitaxel therapy at an initial dose of 100 mg/m2 until disease progression. Prior therapy included adjuvant only (n=17), metastatic only (n=7), or both (n=6). Eighteen patients had received prior anthracycline therapy, 12 of whom had demonstrated progression of disease within 12 months of it. All patients were assessable for efficacy; 29 patients were assessable for toxicity. Pharmacokinetic studies of paclitaxel were also performed. RESULTS: A total of 469 weekly paclitaxel infusions were administered to 30 patients (median, 14 infusions/patient). The median delivered dose-intensity was 91 mg/m2/wk (range, 80 to 108). The overall response rate was 53% (95% confidence interval [CI], 34% to 72%), with 10% complete responses (CRs) and 43% partial responses (PRs). Median response duration was 7.5 months (range, 2 to 11+). Responses were observed in nine of 18 (50%) patients with prior anthracycline therapy, including six of 12 (50%) with disease progression on anthracycline within 1 year (three of four within 6 months). Therapy was well tolerated and remarkable for a lack of overall and cumulative myelosuppression. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in four patients; febrile neutropenia was not observed. Peripheral neuropathy prohibited dose escalation above 100 mg/m2, and grade 3 neuropathy was observed in two of 21 patients at < or = 100 mg/m2. CONCLUSION: Weekly paclitaxel therapy is active and well tolerated in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Weekly therapy should be considered as a current clinical option for these patients and should be incorporated into future comparative clinical trials.     

Hormone replacement therapy improves cardiovascular risk by lowering plasma viscosity in postmenopausal women

Hormone replacement therapy may protect against cardiovascular disease through several mechanisms that have variable actions on the major determinants of plasma viscosity. Plasma viscosity is an important predictor of incident and recurrent cardiovascular events and mortality in coronary heart disease patients. The effect of estrogen alone or in combination with progestin on plasma viscosity is not known. Using a randomized, double-blind design, we examined the impact of the following daily hormone regimens on plasma viscosity in 23 women: (1) 1 mg estradiol and 2.5 mg medroxyprogesterone (n=7); (2) 1 mg estradiol alone (n=8); and (3) placebo (n=8). Plasma viscosity, fibrinogen, and standard lipoprotein levels were determined at baseline and after 12 weeks of intervention. Plasma viscosity was measured at 37 degreesC with a coaxial microviscometer. Fibrinogen was measured by the Clauss method. Significant changes in plasma viscosity (mPa.s) levels occurred among treatment groups (P<0.01) after the intervention. Plasma viscosity was significantly reduced with estrogen replacement therapy (P<0.01). These data demonstrate that estrogen replacement therapy lowers plasma viscosity. This study suggests an additional mechanism for the cardiovascular protection conferred to postmenopausal women on estrogen replacement therapy.     

Clinical characteristics of patients with rheumatoid arthritis and methotrexate induced pneumonitis

OBJECTIVE: To determine the clinical features of methotrexate (MTX) pneumonitis in patients treated for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: The medical records of 284 patients with RA who had been treated with oral MTX (mean followup 33.2 mo) were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: MTX induced interstitial pneumonitis developed in 6 patients (2.1%). The affected patients were significantly older than those without MTX pneumonitis (67.3 +/- 9.8 vs 52.4 +/- 12.6 yrs, respectively; p < 0.005). The cumulative MTX dose ranged from 65 to 580 mg at the time pneumonitis developed. Five of the patients (83%) had preexisting interstitial abnormalities, while only 29 of the 278 patients without MTX pneumonitis (10%) had such abnormalities (p < 0.001). The frequency of adverse effects due to previous treatment with disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) was 66.7% in MTX pneumonitis patients and 14.3% in the other 278 patients (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Advanced age, preexisting interstitial abnormalities, and previous adverse reactions to DMARD may be associated with MTX pneumonitis. Patients with these characteristics require careful monitoring during MTX therapy.