Single and multi-specimenR-curve methods forJ IC determination of toughened nylons

For characterization of the fracture resistance of materials used in the upper shelf toughness regime,J-R curves are widely considered the most promising candidates. However, there still remain problems concerning both the generation and measurement ofJ-R curves as material characterizing parameters and their application in ductile fracture analyses for failure prediction in polymeric materials. This paper reports the results of investigations conducted on two rubbertoughened nylons at room temperature. Two different methods ofJ-R curve determination are covered, namely multi-specimen and single specimen test methods. The resultingJ-R curves have also been evaluated to obtain values of the initiation toughness,J _IC, following the extrapolation and interpolation schemes prescribed by ASTM E813-81 and ASTM E813-87 test procedures, respectively. The results show that the multiple specimen unloading method and the single specimen partial unloading compliance method can be used to generate comparable crack growth resistanceJ-R curves of the toughened nylons. The value ofJ _IC for the crystalline rubber-toughened nylon was approximately twice the value obtained for the amorphous rubber-toughened nylon. The former material also exhibited a greater resistance to ductile crack growth.     

Evaluation of the ISO <Emphasis Type="Italic">J</Emphasis> initiation procedure using the EURO fracture toughness data set

The multiple specimen J _0.2/BL initiation fracture toughness test procedure from the ISO standard, ISO 12135:2002, is evaluated using the EURO fracture toughness data set. This standard is also compared with the ASTM standard, ASTM E 1820, multiple specimen J _Ic procedure. The EURO round robin data set was generated to evaluate the transition fracture toughness methods for steels. However, many of the tests resulted in ductile fracture behavior giving final J versus ductile crack extension points. This is the information that is measured in a multiple specimen J initiation fracture toughness test. The data set has more than 300 individual points of J versus crack extension with four different specimen sizes. It may be the largest data set of that type produced for one material. Therefore, its use to determine J initiation values can provide an important evaluation of the standard procedures. The results showed that a J _0.2/BL value could be determined from the ISO standard for three of the four specimen sizes, the smallest size did not meet the specimen size requirement on J. The construction line slopes in this method are very steep compared with the ASTM construction line slopes. This resulted in low J initiation values, about a factor of two lower than the one from the ASTM method. Of the various criteria imposed to determine a valid J _0.2/BL value, the one limiting the maximum J value was the most questionable. It had an effect of eliminating small specimen data that was identical to acceptable large specimen data.     

CTOD-R curve construction from surface displacement measurements

The construction of a fracture resistance δ–R (or J–R) curve requires the appropriate measurement of crack-tip opening displacement (CTOD) as a function of crack extension. This can be made by different procedures following ASTM E1820, BS7448 or other standards and procedures (e.g., GTP-02, ESIS-P2, etc.) for the measurement of fracture toughness. However, all of these procedures require standard specimens, displacement gauges, and calibration curves to get intrinsic material properties. This paper deals with some analysis and aspects related to the measurement of fracture toughness by observing the surface of the specimen. Tests were performed using three-dimensional surface displacement measurements to determine the fracture parameters and the crack extension values. These tests can be conducted without using a crack mouth opening displacement-CMOD or load-line displacement gauge, because CMOD can be calculated by using the displacement of the surface points. The presented method offers a significant advantage for fracture toughness testing in cases where a clip gauge is not easy to use, for example, on structural components. Simple analysis of stereo-metrical surface displacements gives a load vs. crack opening displacement curve. Results show that the initiation of stable crack propagation can be easy estimated as the point of the curve’s deviation. It is possible to determine the deviation point if the crack opening displacement measurements are close to crack tip in the plastic zone area. The resistance curve, CTOD-R, is developed by the local measurement of crack opening displacement (COD) in rigid body area of specimen. COD values are used for the recalculation with the CMOD parameter as a remote crack opening displacement, according to the ASTM standard.     

A hybrid approach to determine fracture resistance for mode I and mixed‐mode I and II fracture specimens

This paper proposes a hybrid approach to determine the fracture resistance for mode I and mixed‐mode I and II fracture specimens, combining both numerically computed and experimentally measured load (P) versus load‐line displacement (LLD or Δ) relationships for metallic fracture specimens. The hybrid approach predicates on the same principle as the conventional, multiple‐specimen experimental method in determining the energy release rate. The hybrid method computes the P–Δ curves from multiple finite element (FE) models, each with a different crack depth. The experimental procedure measures the P–Δ curve from a standard fracture specimen with a growing crack. The intersections between the experimental P–Δ curve and the numerical P–Δ curves from multiple FE models dictate the LLD levels to compute the strain energy (U) using the area under the numerical P–Δ curves. This method provides accurate estimates of the J resistance data for both SE(B) specimen under mode I loading and single‐edge notched specimens under mixed‐mode I and II loading.     

Evaluating the linear normalization technique for deriving J-resistance curves

In this paper, results from the linear normalization (LN) technique of Reese and Schwalbe for deriving J‐crack resistance (J–R) curves have been compared, related to J–Δa (J‐integral–ductile crack growth) data points, to those obtained from traditional elastic compliance technique. Research results regarding a nuclear grade steel exhibiting a wide range of elastic–plastic fracture resistance agree quite well for both techniques until a certain level of toughness of the material. Below this critical level, LN produces inconsistent results for the sub‐sized compact tension specimens (0.4T C[T]). The evidence suggests that the loss of applicability of the LN technique can be determined on the basis of the η plastic factor (η_pl) for the best linear correlation achieved for ΔP_N–Δa (normalised load gradient–ductile crack growth) data.     

A review of the J and I integrals and their implications for crack growth resistance and toughness in ductile fracture

The application of the J and the I-integrals to ductile fracture are discussed. It is shown that, because of the finite size of the fracture process zone (FPZ), the initiation value of the J-integral is specimen dependent even if the plastic constraint conditions are constant. The paradox that the I-integral for steady state elasto-plastic crack growth is apparently zero is examined. It is shown that, if the FPZ at the crack tip is modelled, the I-integral is equal to the work performed in its fracture. Thus it is essential to model the fracture process zone in ductile fracture. The I-integral is then used to demonstrate that the breakdown in applicability of the J-integral to crack growth in ductile fracture is as much due to the inclusion in the J-integral of progressively more work performed in the plastic zone as it is to non-proportional deformation during unloading behind the crack tip. Thus J _R -curves combine the essential work of fracture performed in the FPZ with the plastic work performed outside of the FPZ. These two work terms scale differently and produce size and geometry dependence. It is suggested that the future direction of modelling in ductile fracture should be to include the FPZ. Strides have already been made in this direction.     

Constraint-modified J−R curves and its application to ductile crack growth

The concept of J-controlled crack growth is extended to J–A ₂ controlled crack growth using J as the loading level and A ₂ as the constraint parameter. It is shown that during crack extension, the parameter A ₂ is an appropriate constraint parameter due to its independence of applied loads under fully plastic conditions or large-scale yielding. A wide range of constraint level is considered using five different types of specimen geometry and loading configuration; namely, compact tension (CT), three-point bend (TPB), single edge-notched tension (SENT), double edge-notched tension (DENT) and centre-cracked panel (CCP). The upper shelf initiation toughness J _IC, tearing resistance T _R and J–R curves tested by Joyce and Link (1995) for A533B steels using the first four specimens are analysed. Through finite element analysis at the applied load of J _IC, the values of A ₂ for all specimens are determined. The framework and construction of constraint-modified J–R curves using A ₂ as the constraint parameter are developed and demonstrated. A procedure of transferring the J–R curves determined from standard ASTM procedure to non-standard specimens or practical cracked structures is outlined. Based on the test data, the constraint-modified J–R curves are presented for the test material of A533B steel. Comparison shows the experimental J–R curves can be reproduced or predicted accurately by the constraint-modified J–R curves for all specimens tested. Finally, the variation of J–R curves with the size of test specimens is produced. The results show that larger specimens tend to have lower crack growth resistance curves.     

Estimation procedure of J-resistance curves for SE(T) fracture specimens using unloading compliance

This work provides an estimation procedure to determine J-resistance curves for pin-loaded and clamped SE(T) fracture specimens using the unloading compliance technique and the η-method. A summary of the methodology upon which J and crack extension are derived sets the necessary framework to determine crack resistance data from the measured load vs. displacement curves. The extensive plane-strain analyses enable numerical estimates of the nondimensional compliance, μ, and parameters η and γ for a wide range of specimen geometries and material properties characteristic of structural and pipeline steels. Laboratory testing of an API 5L X60 steel at room temperature using pin-loaded SE(T) specimens with side-grooves provide the load-displacement data needed to validate the estimation procedure for measuring the crack growth resistance curve for the material. The results presented here produce a representative set of solutions which lend further support to develop standard test procedures for constraint-designed SE(T) specimens applicable in measurements of crack growth resistance for pipelines.     

J–R curves corrected by load-independent constraint parameter in ductile crack growth

The constraint effect on J–resistance curves of ductile crack growth is considered under the condition of two-parameter J–Q^* controlled crack growth, where Q^* is a modified parameter of Q in the J–Q theory. Both J and Q^* are used to characterize the J–R curves with J as the loading level and Q^* as a constraint parameter. It is shown that Q^* is independent of applied loading under large-scale yielding or fully plastic deformation, and so Q^* is a proper constraint parameter during crack growth. An approach to correct constraint effects on the J–R curve is developed, and a procedure of transferring the J–R curves determined from standard ASTM procedure to nonstandard specimens or real cracked structures is outlined.The test data of fracture toughness, J_IC, and tearing modulus, T_R, by Joyce and Link (Engng. Fract. Mech. 57(4) (1997) 431) for a single-edge notched bend specimen with various depth cracks are employed to demonstrate the efficiency of the present approach. The variation of J_IC and T_R with the constraint parameter Q^* is obtained, and then a constraint-corrected J–R curve is constructed for the test material of HY80 steel. Comparisons show that the predicted J–R curves can match well with the experimental data for both deep and shallow cracked specimens over a reasonably large amount of crack extension.Finally, the present approach is applied to predict the J–R curves of ductile crack growth for five conventional fracture specimens. The results show that the effect of specimen geometry on the J–R curves is generally much larger than the effect of specimen sizes, and larger specimens tend to have lower crack growth resistance curves.     

DAMAGE MECHANICS APPROACH TO REMOVE THE CONSTRAINT DEPENDENCE OF ELASTIC–PLASTIC FRACTURE TOUGHNESS

It is now generally agreed that the applicability of a one-parameter J-based ductile fracture approach is limited to so-called high constraint crack geometries, and that the elastic-plastic fracture toughness J_1c, is not a material constant but strongly specimen geometry constraint-dependent. In this paper, the constraint effect on elastic-plastic fracture toughness is investigated by use of a continuum damage mechanics approach. Based on a new local damage theory for ductile fracture(proposed by the author) which has a clear physical meaning and can describe both deformation and constraint effects on ductile fracture, a relationship is described between the conventional elastic-plastic fracture toughness, J_1c, and crack tip constraint, characterized by crack tip stress triaxiality T. Then, a new parameter J_dc (and associated criterion, J_d=J_dc) for ductile fracture is proposed. Experiments show that toughness variation with specimen geometry constraint changes can effectively be removed by use of the constraint correction procedure proposed in this paper, and that the new parameter J_dc is a material constant independent of specimen geometry (constraint). This parameter can serve as a new parameter to differentiate the elastic-plastic fracture toughness of engineering materials, which provides a new approach for fracture assessments of structures. It is not necessary to determine which laboratory specimen matches the structural constraint; rather, any specimen geometry can be tested to measure the size-independent fracture toughness J_dc. The potential advantage is clear and the results are very encouraging.     

Experimentally determined key curves for fracture specimens

Crack extension during fracture toughness tests of ferritic structural steels cannot be determined from measurements of unloading compliance or electric potential change when the specimen is dynamically tested. Measurements of crack extension in fracture toughness tests are also very difficult when the test temperature is high or the test environment is aggressive. To circumvent this limitation, researchers for years have been developing key curve and normalization function methods to estimate crack extension in standard elastic-plastic fracture toughness test geometries. In the key curve method (Ernst et al., 1979; Joyce et al., 1980) a load-displacement curve is measured for a so-called `source' specimen that is sub size or has a blunt notch so that the crack will not initiate during elastic-plastic loading. The load and displacement are then converted to normalized stress-strain units to obtain a key curve that can be used to predict crack extension in geometrically similar `target' specimens of same material loaded at similar loading rates and tested under similar environmental conditions. More recently Landes and coworkers (Herrera and Landes, 1990; Landes et al., 1991) proposed the normalization data reduction technique – Annex A15 of ASTM 1820 specification – that presents an alternative to the standard E1820 unloading compliance procedure. Although the normalization method works well in many cases, it has serious drawbacks: the load, displacement and crack length at the end of the test must be measured; the prescribed functional form that is fitted to the initial and final data may not be accurate for all materials; and the iterative method of inferring crack length from the combination of the data and the normalization function is complex. The compliance ratio (CR) method developed in this paper determines key curves for predicting crack extension as follows. First, a statically loaded source specimen with the unloading compliance procedure specified in ASTM 1820. Second, the so-called CR load-displacement curve is calculated for the source specimen, which is the load-displacement record that would have been obtained if the crack had not extended. Third, non-dimensionalizing the CR load by the maximum load and the displacement by the elastic displacement at the maximum load, P ^* _i/P _max and v _i/v _{el max} from the source specimen yields the adjusted key curve. Analysis of extensive data shows that the key curve is independent of notch type, initial crack length and temperature. But it is dependent on specimen size and steel type. Assuming that the key curves of the source and target specimens are one and the same, the compliance of the target specimens are calculated with a reverse application of the compliance ratio method, and the crack length is obtained using the equations in ASTM E1820. The CR Method is found to be much simpler than the normalization method described in the Annex A15 of ASTM 1820. With the compliance ratio method, Joyce et al. (2001) successfully predicted crack extension in dynamically loaded specimens using a key curve of a statically loaded specimen.     

Limit load solution and loading behavior of C(T) fracture specimen

Deformations far from the crack tip and plastic collapse at limit load may control the fracture of specimens fabricated from highly ductile materials. To investigate the behavior of test specimen under plastic fracture, this paper derives solutions for the limit load of the C(T) specimen based on slip-line analysis. The modified Green's solution gives the most accurate results. Analysis of test data for many types of metal materials shows that, after some initial crack extension, the specimens reach the limit load. Yet, previous investigators analyzed the resistance to crack extension in these specimens with J-R curves. The large plastic deformations and unloading of the material in the wake of crack extension violate the basic assumptions of J-integral, thus invalidating the J-R analysis. It is, therefore, necessary to perform limit load analysis in the investigation of ductile crack extension.     

Effect of fracture path on the toughness of weld metal

The crack propagation direction may affect weld metal fracture behavior. This fracture behavior has been investigated using two sets of single edge notched bend (SENB) specimens; one with a crack propagating in the welding direction (B×2B) and the other with a crack propagating from the top in the root direction (B×B) of a welded joint. Two different weld metals were used, one with low and one with high toughness values. For Weld Metal A, two specimen types have been used (B×B and B×2B) both with deep cracks. The weld metal A (with high toughness values) has reasonably uniform properties between weld root and cap. The resulting J-R curves show little effect of the specimen type, are ductile to the extent that the toughness exceeds the maximum J_max, value allowed by validity limits and testing is in the large –scale yielding regime. In the case of weld metal B (with low toughness values) with two specimen types (B×B and B×2B) the B×B specimen has shallow cracks while the B×2B specimen has deep cracks. Both resulting J-R curves show unstable behavior despite the fact that the types of specimen and their constraints are different. The analysis has shown that crack propagation direction is most influential for a weldment with low toughness in the small scale yielding regime, whereas its influence diminishes due to ductile tearing during stable crack growth and large scale yielding. The results have shown that these effects are different in both the crack initiation phase and during stable crack growth, indicating a dependence on weld metal toughness and the microstructure of the weld metal. It can be concluded that, if resistance curves during stable crack growth do not show differences in both notch orientations, the fracture toughness values of the whole weld metal can be treated as uniform.     

Correction methods of an apparent negative crack growth phenomenon

It often occurs in J–R testing that some initial crack extension (a) data points have anomalous negative values. The reason for the apparent negative crack growth is due to the analysis method. The phenomenon as a possible source of error in determining J _IC or J–R curve from partial unloading compliance experiments may be eliminated by the compliance correction equation or the offset technique. In this study, new correction methods based on compliance correction and blunting behavior are proposed and verified by the measurement of the actual crack length and J _IC analysis.     

Crack growth resistance curves of GLARE 3 5/4 0.3 fiber–metal laminates at low temperature

The objective of this work was the evaluation of crack growth resistance curves ( J–R curves) of commercial GLARE® 3 5/4 laminates at −50 °C. The experimental evaluation of these curves was performed on 50‐mm‐wide compact tension specimens through the unloading compliance technique. The tests were based on the ASTM E1820 standard with minor modifications. Additionally, tensile tests were also performed at −50 °C on dogbone specimens according to the ASTM E8M standard. Comparisons between low and room temperature properties indicate that the material preserves both its tensile strength and fracture toughness at −50 °C, although low temperature J–R curves presented smaller slopes than the room temperature ones after the onset of stable crack growth.     

A STUDY OF SPECIMEN SIZE ON J-R CURVE BEHAVIOUR

This paper presents results from an experimental programme to study size effects in J-R curves. Results are presented from unloading compliance R curve tests on different sized single edge notch bend specimens of nickel aluminium bronze and compared with previously published R curve data on a Ti3A1-2.5V titanium and an HY 100 steel alloy. The crack growth resistance was measured in terms of the standard fracture resistance J, J corrected for crack growth and the J modified parameter proposed by Ernst. It was observed that following a region of size independence small specimen J-R curves could fall either above or below the large specimen curve. It was found that although the limit to J controlled crack growth could be extended the limit is not unique but dependent on material type.     

Numerical simulations to support the normalization data reduction technique

The normalization data reduction (NDR) technique is an analytical methodology for characterizing the upper shelf fracture toughness of steels in the ductile regime, both in terms of critical toughness (J_Ic) and resistance to ductile crack extension (J-R curve). It represents an alternative to the more commonly used multi-specimen or single-specimen (unloading compliance and potential drop) techniques.Finite element analyses of a growing crack are executed to evaluate the performance of the technique. This approach has the advantage to remove large uncertainties entailing experimental results. Results demonstrate the precision of the method.     

J-resistance curve and ductile tearing of a mild steel

The onset of ductile tearing at room temperature of mild steel BS 15 was studied using side grooved compact tension specimens. The approach to this problem was divided conveniently into two basic parts: first, identification and evaluation of the toughness at initiation of crack extension, and second, assessment and characterization of the subsequent crack growth behaviour. The critical value of the J integral for crack initiation, J_c was obtained using two different techniques: the multispecimen method and a single specimen compliance test. It was found that the latter could be used with much larger unloading than originally proposed. This has the advantage of greater accuracy in the determination of the compliance, and consequently in the evaluation of crack extension. In the second part of the work, resistance curves were obtained applying two different approaches. The resistance curves obtained following the more exact method were used for the determination of the tearing modulus T of the material, and the values thus derived, compared with a selection of other steels.     

Slow crack growth in cellulose fibre cements

Slow stable crack growth is a prominent feature of the fracture behaviour of cellulose fibre cements. It is shown that this characteristic can be described by crack growth resistance against crack extension curves based on linear elastic fracture mechanics. Double-cantilever-beam specimens with side grooves are used to obtain such crack resistance curves for a commercial cellulose cement containing approximately 8% mass fraction of bleached fibres. Both dry and wet samples are tested. Compliances measured during slow crack growth by the unloading/reloading technique at successive crack increments are less than those obtained for saw-cut notches with similar crack lengths. Residual displacements due to either mismatch fracture surfaces or a large inelastic process zone at the crack tip are also observed at zero load. A modified elastic potential energy release rate (G _R ^* ), and hence its equivalentK _R ^* [= (EG _R ^* )^1/2], must be used to include this residual displacement effect in order to yield the true crack growth resistance curves. This is found to be necessary for the wet samples due to their large residual displacements. The crack growth resistances of the wet samples are superior to those of the dry samples: this is explained in terms of the improved ductility and toughness of the wet cellulose fibres.     

Comparison of using the crack mouth displacement (CMOD) and load line displacement (LLD) methods in the determination of critical J integral in SENB specimens

Various methods for direct and indirect determination of LLD and CMOD were used to determine J from SENB specimens in three different steels. The influence of the displacement measurement on J is discussed, and shows that the values of J using LLD determined from clip gauge methods to the ASTM E1820 or ISO 12135 standards are consistent with values of J determined from CMOD (either directly or using clip gauge methods), as defined in ASTM E1820. From this work it is recommended that standard methods such as ISO 12135 should permit load‐CMOD and load‐LLD as alternative methods to determine J. Methods to determine LLD by corrections to the ram displacement were also shown to be effective in determining J, for applications where the use of clip gauges may be challenging, such as fracture toughness testing in sour environments, dynamic tests, or testing at very high temperature.