Screening of β‐Glucosidase and β‐Xylosidase Activities in Four Non‐Saccharomyces Yeast Isolates

The finding of new isolates of non‐Saccharomyces yeasts, showing beneficial enzymes (such as β‐glucosidase and β‐xylosidase), can contribute to the production of quality wines. In a selection and characterization program, we have studied 114 isolates of non‐Saccharomyces yeasts. Four isolates were selected because of their both high β‐glucosidase and β‐xylosidase activities. The ribosomal D1/D2 regions were sequenced to identify them as Pichia membranifaciens Pm7, Hanseniaspora vineae Hv3, H. uvarum Hu8, and Wickerhamomyces anomalus Wa1. The induction process was optimized to be carried on YNB‐medium supplemented with 4% xylan, inoculated with 106 cfu/mL and incubated 48 h at 28 °C without agitation. Most of the strains had a pH optimum of 5.0 to 6.0 for both the β‐glucosidase and β‐xylosidase activities. The effect of sugars was different for each isolate and activity. Each isolate showed a characteristic set of inhibition, enhancement or null effect for β‐glucosidase and β‐xylosidase. The volatile compounds liberated from wine incubated with each of the 4 yeasts were also studied, showing an overall terpene increase (1.1 to 1.3‐folds) when wines were treated with non‐Saccharomyces isolates. In detail, terpineol, 4‐vinyl‐phenol and 2‐methoxy‐4‐vinylphenol increased after the addition of Hanseniaspora isolates. Wines treated with Hanseniaspora, Wickerhamomyces, or Pichia produced more 2‐phenyl ethanol than those inoculated with other yeasts.     

DETERMINATION OF α- AND β-AMYLASE IN MALT

The Analysis Committee of the European Brewery Convention carried out a collaborative trial on malts using the specific analysis methods for α- and β-amylase activities based on dyed substrates supplied by MegaZyme (Aust.) Pty. Ltd. The repeatability and reproducibility values for the methods were judged to be unsatisfactory and consequently the methods were not recommended for Analytica-EBC.     

Structural characterisation of β‐cyclodextrin crosslinked by adipic acid

This study was conducted to investigate the structural characterisation of β‐cyclodextrin (β‐CD) crosslinked by adipic acid. β‐CD was treated with different concentrations (0%, 5%, 10% and 15%, w/v) of adipic acid. Different instruments, such as scanning electron microsope (SEM), Fourier‐transform infrared (FT‐IR) spectroscopy and ¹H and ¹³C nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra were used to find out chemical structure in the crosslinked β‐CD. SEM analysis suggested that crosslinking β‐CD with 15% adipic acid changed the original morphology and considerably increased the particle size of the raw material. FT‐IR spectroscopy data showed that an intensive absorption band at 1706 cm^?1 was present in the β‐CD samples treated with 10% and 15% adipic acid, indicating a crosslinking between hydroxyl groups of β‐CD and carboxyl groups of adipic acid. NMR spectra revealed that the ester linkages between hydroxyl groups of β‐CD and carboxyl groups of adipic acid were formed after crosslinking of β‐CD with adipic acid.     

Improvement of microbial transglutaminase‐induced gelation of β‐conglycinin by conjugation with dextran

This work focused on the effect of glycosylation on the gelation ability of β‐conglycinin induced by microbial transglutaminase (MTGase). Rheological results indicated that the gels of β‐conglycinin‐dextran conjugate products exhibited higher G′ value (172.2 ± 8.6 Pa) compared with those of dry‐heated β‐conglycinin (75.2 ± 5.1 Pa), β‐conglycinin (53.3 ± 4.0 Pa) and β‐conglycinin‐dextran mixture (38.6 ± 2.6 Pa) after 4 h incubation with MTGase. The gels prepared from β‐conglycinin‐dextran conjugate products had higher hardness, fracturability, springiness and cohesiveness values determined by textural profile analysis. The turbidity of β‐conglycinin‐dextran conjugate products solution incubated with MTGase increased faster than those of the other three protein samples. The conjugated dextran in β‐conglycinin‐dextran conjugate products could inhibit extensive protein–protein interactions which might result in the formation of more ordered and stronger gel network structures during MTGase cross‐linking process. A compact and homogeneous gel networks in β‐conglycinin‐dextran conjugate products gels were also observed by scanning electron microscopy.