Refining the Undecidability Border of Weak Bisimilarity

Weak bisimilarity is one of the most studied behavioural equivalences. This equivalence is undecidable for pushdown processes (PDA), process algebras (PA), and multiset automata (MSA, also known as parallel pushdown processes, PPDA). Its decidability is an open question for basic process algebras (BPA) and basic parallel processes (BPP). We move the undecidability border towards these classes by showing that the equivalence remains undecidable for weakly extended versions of BPA and BPP. In fact, we show that the weak bisimulation equivalence problem is undecidable even for normed subclasses of BPA and BPP extended with a finite constraint system.     

Weak bisimilarity and regularity of context-free processes is EXPTIME-hard

We show that checking weak bisimulation equivalence of two context-free processes (also called BPA-processes) is EXPTIME-hard, even under the condition that the processes are normed. Furthermore, checking weak regularity (finiteness up to weak bisimilarity) for context-free processes is EXPTIME-hard as well. Adding a finite control of the minimal non-trivial size of 2 to the BPA process already makes weak bisimilarity undecidable.     

Simulation Preorder over Simple Process Algebras

We consider the problem of simulation preorder/equivalence between infinite-state processes and finite-state ones. First, we describe a general method how to utilize the decidability of bisimulation problems to solve (certain instances of) the corresponding simulation problems. For certain process classes, the method allows us to design effective reductions of simulation problems to their bisimulation counterparts and some new decidability results for simulation have already been obtained in this way. Then we establish the decidability border for the problem of simulation preorder/equivalence between infinite-state processes and finite-state ones w.r.t. the hierarchy of process rewrite systems. In particular, we show that simulation preorder (in both directions) and simulation equivalence are decidable in EXPTIME between pushdown processes and finite-state ones. On the other hand, simulation preorder is undecidable between PA and finite-state processes in both directions. These results also hold for those PA and finite-state processes which are deterministic and normed, and thus immediately extend to trace preorder. Regularity (finiteness) w.r.t. simulation and trace equivalence is also shown to be undecidable for PA. Finally, we prove that simulation preorder (in both directions) and simulation equivalence are intractable between all classes of infinite-state systems (in the hierarchy of process rewrite systems) and finite-state ones. This result is obtained by showing that the problem whether a BPA (or BPP) process simulates a finite-state one is PSPACE-hard and the other direction is co -hard; consequently, simulation equivalence between BPA (or BPP) and finite-state processes is also co -hard.     

Deciding bisimulation and trace equivalences for systems with many identical processes

In the study of process semantics, trace equivalence and bisimulation equivalence constitute the two extremes of the so-called linear time—branching time spectrum. In this paper, we study the complexity and decidability issues of deciding trace and bisimulation equivalences for the model of systems with many identical processes with respect to various interprocess communication structures. In our model, each system consists of an arbitrary number of identical finite-state processes using Milner's calculus of communicating systems (CCS) as the style of interprocess communication. As it turns out, deciding trace and bisimulation equivalences are undecidable for star-like and linear systems, whereas the two problems are complete for PSPACE and PTIME, respectively, for fully connected systems.     

The inclusion problem for simple languages

A deterministic pushdown acceptor is called a simple machine when it is restricted to have only one state, operate in real-time, and accept by empty store. While the existence of an effective procedure for deciding equivalence of languages accepted by these simple machines is well-known, it is shown that this family is powerful enough to have an undecidable inclusion problem. It follows that the inclusion problems for the LL(k) languages and the free monadic recursion schemes that do not use an identity function are also undecidable.     

Head and state hierarchies for unary multi-head finite automata

Unary deterministic one-way multi-head finite automata characterize the unary regular languages. Here they are studied with respect to the existence of head and state hierarchies. It turns out that for any fixed number of states, there is an infinite proper head hierarchy. In particular, the head hierarchy for stateless deterministic one-way multi-head finite automata is obtained using unary languages. On the other hand, it is shown that for a fixed number of heads, \(m+1\) states are more powerful than \(m\) states. Finally, the open question of whether emptiness is undecidable for stateless one-way two-head finite automata is addressed and, as a partial answer, undecidability can be shown if at least four states are provided.     

Trace,failure and testing equivalences for communicating processes

A basic question in the theory of communicating processes is “When should two processes be considered equivalent?”. Attempts to answer this question have led to the concepts of observation equivalence, bisimulations, testing equivalence, failure equivalence, etc. The main point of this paper is to increase the understanding and motivation for two of these equivalences, namely failure and testing equivalences. The approach starts with the idea that the equivalence of processes should be reducible to the visible sequences of actions which a process performs in various contexts. This idea is implemented by a string-based semantic order for communicating processes where divergence is catastrophic. Under some assumptions about contexts, the resulting semantics is shown to be equivalent to theimproved failure semantics of Brookes and Roscoe⁽¹⁾ and also to themust testing-semantics of Hennessy and DeNicola.^(2–4) This characterization gives independent support for the appropriateness of failures and testing.     

On the language equivalence of NE star-patterns

A pattern is a finite string of constant and variable symbols. The language generated by a pattern is the set of all strings of constant symbols which can be obtained from the pattern by substituting (non-empty) strings for variables. The pattern languages are one of language family which is orthogonal to the Chomsky-type languages hierarchy. They have many applications, such as the extended regular expressions, for instance, in languages Perl, awk, etc. They are well applicable in machine learning as well. There are erasing and non-erasing patterns are used. For non-erasing pattern languages the equivalence of languages is decidable but the inclusion problem for them is undecidable. In extended regular expressions one can use union, concatenation and Kleene star to make more complex patterns. It is also known, that the equivalence problem of extended regular expressions is undecidable. However, the problem, whether the equivalence is decidable for patterns using only concatenation and star still open. In this paper there are some interesting results about inclusion properties and equivalences of some kinds of erasing and non-erasing pattern languages. We show that the equivalence problem of non-erasing patterns in some cases can be reduced to the decidability problem of some very special inclusion properties. These results may be useful to decide whether the language equivalence of non-erasing star-patterns is decidable or not.     

On subsumption and semiunification in feature algebras

We consider a generalization of term subsumption, or matching, to a class of mathematical structures which we call feature algebras. We show how these generalize both first-order terms and the feature structures used in computational linguistics. The notion of term subsumption generalizes to a natural notion of algebra homomorphism. In the setting of feature algebras, unification, corresponds naturally to solving constraints involving equalities between strings of unary function symbols, and semiunification also allows inequalities representing subsumption constraints. Our generalization allows us to show that the semiunification problem for finite feature algebras is undecidable. This implies that the corresponding problem for rational trees (cyclic terms) is also undecidable.     

On sentential forms of context-free grammars

Summary There is no algorithm for deciding whether two linear context-free grammars generate the same sentential forms. The equivalence problem for propagatingOL-systems is undecidable. The finiteness problem forOL-systems is decidable.SF-languages, i.e., languages which equal the set of sentential forms of a context-free grammar, possess some of the properties of context-free languages but their family is not closed under any of the ordinary operations.     

Deciding Branching Bisimilarity of Normed Context-Free Processes Is in Σ2

We show that the problem of deciding branching bisimulation equivalence for normed context-free processes is in Σ^p₂, the second level of the polynomial-time hierarchy, and hence in PSPACE. We also show that minimization of normed context-free process graphs is in PSPACE.     

On the Undecidability of Implications between Embedded Multivalued Database Dependencies

The implication and finite implication problems for embedded multivalued database dependencies are both shown to be algorithmically undecidable. The proof is by an interpretation of semigroup word problems via systems of permuting equivalence relations into database dependencies. In contrast, it is shown that for each fixed premise H one has a decision procedure for implications H F.     

Deciding the isomorphism problem in classes of unary automatic structures

We solve the isomorphism problem for certain classes of unary automatic structures: unary automatic equivalence relations, unary automatic linear orders, and unary automatic trees. That is, we provide algorithms which decide whether two given elements of these classes are isomorphic. In doing so, we define new finite representations for these structures which give normal forms.¹     

Trace Machines for Observing Continuous-Time Markov Chains

In this paper, we study several linear-time equivalences (Markovian trace equivalence, failure and ready trace equivalence) for continuous-time Markov chains that refer to the probabilities for timed execution paths. Our focus is on testing scenarios by means of push-button experiments with appropriate trace machines and a discussion of the connections between the equivalences. For Markovian trace equivalence, we provide alternative characterizations, including one that abstracts away from the time instances where actions are observed, but just reports on the average sojourn times in the states. This result is used for a reduction of the question whether two finite-state continuous-time Markov chains are Markovian trace equivalent to the probabilistic trace equivalence problem for discrete-time Markov chains (and the latter is known to be solvable in polynomial time).     

‘Closed Interval Process Algebra’ versus ‘Interval Process Algebra’

Summary. In this paper we extend the theory of processes with durational actions that has been proposed in [1,2] to describe and reason about the performance of systems. We associate basic actions with lower and upper time bounds, that specify their possible different durations. Depending on how the lower and upper time bounds are fixed, eager actions (those which happen as soon as they can), lazy actions (those which can wait arbitrarily long before firing) as well as patient actions (those which can be delayed for a while) can be modelled. Processes are equipped with a (soft) operational semantics which is consistent with the original one and is well-timed (observation traces are ordered with respect to time). The bisimulation-based equivalence defined on top of the new operational semantics, timed equivalence, turns out to be a congruence and, within the lazy fragment of the algebra, refines untimed equivalences. Decidability and automatic checking of timed equivalence are also stated by resorting to a finite alternative characterization which is amenable to an automatic treatment by using standard algorithms. The relationships with other timed calculi and equivalences proposed in the literature are also established. Received: 22 May 1998 / 8 November 2000     

A fully abstract semantics for causality in the \pi-calculus

We examine the meaning of causality in calculi for mobile processes like the -calculus, and we investigate the relationship between interleaving and causal semantics for such calculi. We separate two forms of causal dependencies on actions of -calculus processes, called subject and object dependencies: The former originate from the nesting of prefixes and are propagated through interactions among processes (they are the only form of causal dependencies present in CCS-like languages); the latter originate from the binding mechanisms on names. We propose a notion of causal bisimulation which distinguishes processes which differ for the subject or for the object dependencies. We show that this causal equivalence can be reconducted to, or implemented into, the ordinary interleaving observation equivalence. We prove that our encoding is fully abstract w.r.t. the two behavioural equivalences. This allows us to exploit the simpler theory of the interleaving semantics to reason about the causal one. In [San94b] a similar programme is carried out for location bisimulation [BCHK91], a non-interleaving spatial-sensitive (as opposed to causal-sensitive) behavioural equivalence. The comparison between the encodings of causal bisimulation in this paper, and of location bisimulation in [San94b], evidences the similarities and the differences between these two equivalences. Received 11 December 1995 / 16 June 1997     

A Partition Refinement Algorithm for the π-Calculus

The partition refinement algorithm is the basis for most of the tools for checking bisimulation equivalences and for computing minimal realisations of CCS-like finite state processes. In this paper, we present a partition refinement algorithm for the π-calculus, a development of CCS where channel names can be communicated. It can be used to check bisimilarity and to compute minimal realisations of finite control processes—the π-calculus counterpart of CCS finite state processes. The algorithm is developed for strong open bisimulation and can be adapted to late and early bisimulations, as well as to weak bisimulations. To arrive at the algorithm, a few laws, proof techniques, and four characterizations of open bisimulation are proved.     

Undecidability of domino games and hhp-bisimilarity

History preserving bisimilarity (hp-bisimilarity) and hereditary history preserving bisimilarity (hhp-bisimilarity) are behavioural equivalences taking into account causal relationships between events of concurrent systems. Their prominent feature is that they are preserved under action refinement, an operation important for the top-down design of concurrent systems. It is shown that, in contrast to hp-bisimilarity, checking hhp-bisimilarity for finite labelled asynchronous transition systems is undecidable, by a reduction from the halting problem of 2-counter machines. To make the proof more transparent a novel intermediate problem of checking domino bisimilarity for origin constrained tiling systems is introduced and shown undecidable. It is also shown that the unlabelled domino bisimilarity problem is undecidable, which implies undecidability of hhp-bisimilarity for unlabelled finite asynchronous systems. Moreover, it is argued that the undecidability of hhp-bisimilarity holds for finite elementary net systems and 1-safe Petri nets.     

On the equivalence of some transductions involving letter to letter morphisms on regular languages

Summary Equivalence problems of some transductions involving letter to letter morphisms on regular languages are discussed. In particular, we deal with finite substitutions and inverses of finite substitutions. Our main results are the following: (i) The equivalence problem of inverses of finite substitutions on regular languages is undecidable, (ii) The existential equivalence problem of finite substitutions on regular languages is undecidable, and (iii) The length-equivalence problem of finite substitutions on regular languages is decidable.