Treatment of advanced adenocarcinomas of the exocrine pancreas and the gallbladder with 5-fluorouracil, high dose levofolinic acid and oral hydroxyurea on a weekly schedule. Results of a multicenter study of the Southern Italy Oncology Group (G.O.I.M.)

BACKGROUND: To date there is no established chemotherapeutic treatment for patients with unresectable locally advanced and/or metastatic carcinomas of the exocrine pancreas or the gallbladder. A multicenter Phase II trial has been performed by the Southern Italy Oncology Group with the aim of evaluating the clinical effectiveness and tolerability of weekly 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in modulation with intravenous (i.v.) high dose levofolinic acid and oral hydroxyurea. METHODS: A total of 70 patients fulfilling the standard eligibility for a Phase II study were enrolled in the trial. Forty patients had advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma and 30 had advanced gallbladder carcinoma. The treatment schedule was: levofolinic acid, 100 mg/m2, in 500 mL of normal saline over 2-hour infusion followed by 5-FU, 600 mg/m2 i.v. bolus, and oral hydroxyurea, 1000 mg/m2, for 1 day every week for 6 consecutive weeks followed by 15 days of rest. RESULTS: Among the 40 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma, 5 (12.5%; 95% confidence level [CL], 8.5-16.5%) showed a partial response with a median duration of 5.6+ months, and 13 had stable disease. Twenty-two patients progressed. Median survival was 5.8 months. Among patients with advanced gallbladder carcinoma, 9 of 30 had a partial response (30%; 95% CL, 26-34%) with a median duration of 6.5 months, and 8 (27%) had stabilization of disease. Thirteen patients showed progressive disease. Median overall survival was 8 months. Toxicity was mild, with Grade 1 to 2 leukopenia and gastrointestinal toxicity the most frequent side effects. No chemotherapy-related deaths were observed. CONCLUSIONS: 5-FU in modulation with i.v. levofolinic acid and oral hydroxyurea on a weekly schedule is well tolerated by the vast majority of patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic carcinoma of the pancreas or the gallbladder. Although response rate and overall survival for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma are far from acceptable, the 30% overall response rate achieved in patients with advanced gallbladder carcinoma suggests that 5-FU in modulation with levofolinic acid and hydroxyurea is active in this neoplasm. The combination of modulated 5-FU with other antineoplastic drugs seems worthy of clinical testing in further controlled trials.     

A phase II study of irinotecan alternated with five days bolus of 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in first-line chemotherapy of metastatic colorectal cancer

PURPOSE: This multicenter phase II study was designed to assess the efficacy of the alternating schedule of irinotecan (CPT-11) with bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) in first-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with histologically proven metastatic colorectal cancer, and at least one bidimensionally measurable lesion, aged 18-70, with performance status < or = 2, normal baseline biological values and no prior chemotherapy (or only adjuvant chemotherapy completed > or = 6 months before study entry) were selected. Treatment was irinotecan 350 mg/m2, i.v., day 1, alternating with leucovorin 20 mg/m2 i.v. and 5-FU 425 mg/m2, i.v. daily for five consecutive days, day 22-26 (Mayo Clinic regimen). One alternating cycle was to be performed every six weeks. Patients were evaluated for efficacy every alternating cycle. Treatment was administered until five alternating cycles, disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or patient refusal. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients (28 chemotherapy-na?ve and five with prior adjuvant treatment completed > 1 year prior to accrual) were enrolled. The objective response rate (RR) was 30% (95% CI: 16-49; 10 patients/33; nine partial response and one complete response). All responses were reviewed by an independent external review committee. An additional 49% of patients had stable disease. The median survival was 16 months, the one year survival amounted to 58% and the median progression free survival was 7.2 months. Relative dose intensity was nearly 90% for both drugs. Grade 3-4 diarrhea and neutropenia were the most frequent severe toxic events, seen in 24% and 64% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The alternating schedule of CPT-11 350 mg/m2 with five days bolus of 5-FU and low dose LV is an active and feasible regimen as front-line therapy for metastatic CRC. It is well tolerated, without evidence of overlapping toxicity. The response rate appears promising with regard to that expected with either single agent. This regimen warrants further assessment in randomized trials.     

Anti-glomerular basement membrane (GBM)-antibody-mediated disease with normal renal function

The purpose of this study was to compare the objective response rate, duration of remission, and survival of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) versus those of 5-FU plus levamisole in metastatic colorectal cancer using the same dose and schedule of these agents as in the North Central Cancer Treatment Group and intergroup studies of adjuvant therapy. Patients with no prior history of chemotherapy for metastatic disease were entered on this Hoosier Oncology Group randomized Phase III trial. Patients were stratified by Karnofsky performance status and presence or absence of liver metastases. They were randomized to receive 450 mg/m2 5-FU i.v. for 5 days followed by 15 mg/kg i.v. weekly (arm 1) or the same dose of 5-FU plus levamisole 50 mg p.o. every 8 h for 3 days every 2 weeks (arm 2). The duration of treatment for both arms was 26 weeks. From April 1990 to March 1995, 199 patients were entered. One hundred eighty-two patients, 91 in each arm, were fully evaluable. The response rates were 12% on arm 1 and 13% on arm 2. The median duration of response was 18 weeks on both arms. The median survival was 48 weeks on arm 1 and 41 weeks on arm 2 (P = 0.20). This study failed to show any improvement in survival, response, or duration of remission with the addition of levamisole to 5-FU in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.     

Phase II trials of 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with metastatic gastric or pancreatic carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Previous trials in patients with colorectal carcinoma have indicated that enhancement of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) by leucovorin (LV) can result in an improved response rate and increased survival. METHODS: Phase II trials were performed with patients who had either gastric or papcreatic adenocarcinoma with inetastases. Forty-one gastric carcinoma patients and 31 pancreatic carcinoma patients with measurable disease were treated with 5-FU, 425 mg/m2 intraveneosly (i.v.) on Days 1-5 plus LV, 20 mg/m2 i.v., on Days 1-5, reported at 4 and 8 weeks, and then every 5 weeks thereafter. RESULTS: The patients with metastatic gastric carcinoma had a median survival of 4.8 months. There was a 22% objective response rate, including a 4.9% complete response rate and a 17.1% partial response rate. Among the 31 patients with pancreatic carcinoma, there was a median survival of 5.7 months. No patients in this group showed a response. CONCLUSIONS: The response rate for patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma was modest and this regimen may provide temporary palliation for some patients. However, 5-FU and LV treatment is ineffective against metastatic pancreatic carcinoma.     

Chemotherapy with methotrexate, vinblastine, epirubicin and carboplatin (Carbo-MVE) in transitional cell urothelial cancer. A Hellenic Co-Operative Oncology Group study

OBJECTIVES: We conducted a phase II study in order to assess the efficacy and toxicity of Carbo-MVE (carboplatin 250 mg/m2 i.v. day 1, methotrexate 25 mg/m2 i.v. days 1, 15 and 22, vinblastine 2.5 mg/m2 i.v. days 1, 15 and 22 and epirubicin 25 mg/m2 day 1). The regimen ws to be repeated every 28 days. METHODS: Forty-six patients with transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder entered the study. Patients with metastatic disease were treated for 6 cycles, while patients with locally advanced or locoregional disease had 4 cycles of induction chemotherapy followed by cystectomy or radiotherapy. RESULTS: Toxicity was generally mild and treatment well tolerated. The overall response rate was 54.4%, with 26% complete and 28.3% partial response rates. The median survival was 17.5 months with the complete responders to live significantly longer (64.82 months) than those who had a partial response (20.5 months), stable disease (15 months) or progressive disease (8.5 months). Survival was also significantly longer in patients with good performance status as well as in patients with locally advanced or locoregional disease. Finally, patients who had cystectomy as definitive treatment survived significantly longer (32 months) than those who had been irradiated (16 months). CONCLUSIONS: The Carbo-MVE regimen appears to be an effective and well-tolerated treatment in patients with transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder.     

Multivariate analyses of the hominid ulna from Klasies River mouth

BACKGROUND: The combination of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and cisplatin has shown great activity in many different types of tumour with an in vitro synergistic effect between 5-FU and cisplatin. A phase II study of 5-FU plus cisplatin was performed in 25 previously untreated patients with inoperable locally advanced or metastatic biliary tract carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients, 10 of them men and 15 women with a median age of 58, were entered into the study. The chemotherapy regimen consisted of 5-FU: 1 g/m2/day in continuous intravenous (i.v.) infusion for five consecutive days, and cisplatin: 100 mg/m2/day on day 2 in a one-hour infusion with standard hyperhydration. Twenty-two patients had metastatic tumours and three had locally advanced disease. RESULTS: Of the 25 patients entered into the study, 24 were evaluable for response and 25 for toxicity. Nausea and vomiting was the main toxic side effect in 19 patients. Severe, WHO grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia or neutropenia were observed in three and seven patients, respectively. There were no toxic deaths. Of 25 patients, six had partial remissions (overall response 24%, 95% confidence interval 7%-41%). For three patients, tumour reduction permitted local radiotherapy and one of these patients with initially advanced disease is still alive six years after the beginning of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This study, one of the largest phase II trials performed in this disease, shows interesting activity of the combination of 5-FU and cisplatin in advanced biliary tract carcinoma.     

A phase II study of carboplatin, cisplatin, interferon-alpha, and tamoxifen for patients with metastatic melanoma

The purpose of this trial was to determine the toxicity and antineoplastic activity of cisplatin, carboplatin, tamoxifen, and interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) in patients with advanced melanoma. Eleven patients with metastatic melanoma were enrolled. The patients received carboplatin 400 mg/m2 i.v. on day 0; cisplatin 25 mg/m2 i.v. on days 7, 14, and 21; tamoxifen 20 mg p.o. b.i.d. on days 0-27; and interferon-alpha 5 million units/m2 subcutaneously 3 times per week. Cycles were repeated every 28 days. Patients were assessed for tumor response at the end of 2 cycles. Toxicity was severe, with 14 of 24 cycles given requiring some form of dose reduction. Carboplatin dose reductions were related to bone-marrow toxicity, whereas IFN-alpha caused fatigue, arthralgias, myalgias, and fever. The overall response rate was 18% (2 partial responses [PRs]). The combination of cisplatin, carboplatin, tamoxifen, and IFN-alpha is active in advanced melanoma; however, the toxicity is unacceptable.     

Drug resistance patterns among tuberculosis patients in Rome, 1990-1992

PURPOSE: A Phase II study to evaluate the effect of a five-drug regimen, VP-16, ifosfamide, cisplatin, vinblastine, and bleomycin (VIP/VB) on complete response rate, continuous disease-free survival, and toxicity in patients with advanced germ-cell tumor. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty male patients with a histologic diagnosis of advanced-stage germ-cell cancer, previously untreated with chemotherapy, received the following: etoposide 75 mg/m2 i.v. days 1-5; ifosfamide (with mesna uroprotection) 1.2 g/m2 i.v. days 1-5; cisplatin 20 mg/m2 i.v. days 1-5; vinblastine 0.18 mg/kg i.v. day 1; bleomycin 30 units i.v. day 1; filgrastim 5 micrograms/kg days 7-16. Chemotherapy was given every 3 weeks (bleomycin weekly x 12) for four courses. RESULTS: All patients entered were evaluable for toxicity, response, and survival. Eleven of 20 (55%) achieved complete remissions with chemotherapy alone and an additional 5 (25%) were rendered disease-free with surgical resection of teratoma (3) or viable cancer (2). Two patients relapsed at 4 and 5 months from complete remission (CR). There was one treatment-related death, from bleomycin lung toxicity after thoracotomy. Thirteen patients (65%) are alive and continuously free of disease, with a median follow-up of 20 months and a minimal follow-up of 12 months. Hematologic toxicity was most common, with 16 patients (80%) having grade 3 or 4 leukopenia. CONCLUSIONS: VIP/VB appears to be a very active regimen in advanced disseminated germ-cell cancer. Hematological toxicity was severe but manageable.     

A phase I study of paclitaxel and 5-fluorouracil in advanced gastric cancer

This is a phase I study to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and toxicity of a combination of paclitaxel and 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) in advanced gastric cancer patients. The patients, refractory to the PELF regimen (5-FU, leucovorin, cisplatin, epidoxorubicin), received weekly 5-FU at the fixed dose of 500 mg/m2, and escalating doses of paclitaxel every 3 weeks with a starting dose of 150 mg/m2 given as in 3-h infusion. The dose was escalated by 25 mg/m2 every 3 patients. Fifteen patients entered the study. The upper paclitaxel dose (225 mg/m2) was given to 6 patients. Up to this dose, no severe toxicity (grade 3-4) was recorded. Apart from alopecia, grade 1-2 leukopenia occurred in 5 patients and grade 1-2 neurotoxicity in 2 patients. All patients were evaluable for response (at least 2 cycles): 2 patients achieved an objective response (200 and 225 mg/m2). In 6 patients, treatment resulted in notable relief from symptoms. Out-patient paclitaxel given over 3 h and 5-FU may be combined safely for the treatment of patients with advanced gastric cancer. The recommended doses for phase II study are paclitaxel 225 mg/m2 and 5-FU 500 mg/m2.     

A phase II study of 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and cisplatin (FLP) for metastatic gastric cancer

The modulation of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) with folinic acid (leucovorin, LV) is more efficacious than 5-FU alone in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer, and the combination of 5-FU with cisplatin is currently one of the most active regimens in advanced gastric cancer. A phase II study was therefore conducted to test the efficacy and toxicity of the combination of 5-FU, LV and cisplatin (FLP) in metastatic gastric cancer. 28 patients entered the study. Metastatic sites were observed in the liver (in 21 patients), the peritoneum (in 8), the lymph nodes (in 7) or the bones (in 1) and a local recurrence was noted in 4 cases. The performance status (using World Health Organisation criteria) was 0 for 13 patients and 1 or 2 for the others. Cycles of treatment were administered every 28 days and consisted of LV 200 mg/m2/day for 5 days followed by 5-FU 400 mg/m2/day for 5 days with cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on day 2. The response rate for the 27 evaluable patients was 51.8% (95% confidence interval (CI), 33-70.6%). There were four complete responses (14.8%) and 10 partial responses (37%). Median survival was 11 months and 4 patients were alive at 2 years. Both response rate and survival were better for patients with a good performance status. The overall toxicity was very low, except for 1 patient who died of dehydration and cardiac failure. In conclusion, the FLP protocol was effective and well tolerated in patients with metastatic gastric cancer.     

Paclitaxel, carboplatin, and extended-schedule etoposide in the treatment of small-cell lung cancer: comparison of sequential phase II trials using different dose-intensities

PURPOSE: In two sequential phase II studies, we evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of adding paclitaxel to a standard platinum/etoposide regimen in the first-line treatment of small-cell lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred seventeen patients with small-cell lung cancer were treated between June 1993 and July 1996. The first 38 patients received a lower-dose regimen: paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 by 1-hour infusion, carboplatin at an area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of 5.0, and etoposide 50 mg alternating with 100 mg orally on days 1 to 10. When only mild myelosuppression was observed, doses of paclitaxel and carboplatin were increased in the subsequent 79 patients (paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 by 1-hour infusion and carboplatin at an AUC of 6.0). All patients received four courses of treatment, administered at 21-day intervals. Patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer also received thoracic radiation therapy (1.8 Gy/d; total dose, 45 Gy) administered concurrently with courses 3 and 4 of chemotherapy. RESULTS: Seventy-two of 79 patients (91%) who receive the higher-dose regimen had major responses. Thirty-two of 38 (84%) with extensive-stage disease responded (21% complete response rate); median survival was 10 months for this group. With limited-stage disease, the overall response rate was 98%, with 71% complete responses; the median survival time has not been reached at 16 months. Median survival in extensive-stage patients was longer in patients who received the higher-dose regimen (10 months) than in the previous group treated with lower doses (7 months; P = .008). The higher-dose regimen was well tolerated, with myelosuppression being the major toxicity. Compared with the lower-dose regimen, grade 3/4 neutropenia increased from 8% to 38% of courses, but the incidence of hospitalization for neutropenia and fever did not increase. Other nonhematologic toxicities were uncommon, and did not increase substantially with the higher-dose regimen. CONCLUSION: Paclitaxel can be added at full dose (200 mg/m2) to a carboplatin/etoposide combination while maintaining a tolerable toxicity profile. Median survival times in both extensive- and limited-stage patients compare favorably with other reported regimens. This regimen merits further investigation, and a randomized trial to compare this regimen with a standard carboplatin/etoposide combination is underway.     

Anosognosia and procedural learning in Alzheimer''s disease

Biochemical modulation of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) by folinic acid (FA) increases the response rate in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer compared to 5-FU alone. Phase II trials also demonstrated increased efficacy when interferon was added to 5-FU. In two consecutive trials, 76 patients were treated on days 1-5 with FA 200 mg/m2 plus interferon 5 x 10(6) U/m2 and 5-FU 350 mg/m2 as intravenous bolus injection (n = 33, regimen A) or 5-FU 500 mg/m2 as 2-hour infusion (n = 43, regimen B), repeated every 3 weeks with individual 5-FU dose escalation in steps of 50 (regimen A) or 100 mg/m2 (regimen B). In regimen A 5-FU dose reduction to 300 mg/m2 due to toxicity was necessary in 49% of the patients; in regimen B a 5-FU dose of 600 mg/m2 or above was tolerated by 70% of the patients. Dose-limiting toxicity was severe mucositis and/or diarrhea. Objective responses were observed in 5 of 33 patients (15%) in regimen A (3-28%, 95% confidence interval) and 7 of 41 patients (17%) in regimen B (5-29%, 95% confidence interval). Median time to progression was 4.7 and 4.8 months, and median survival 9.9 and 11.4 months for regimens A and B, respectively. Prolonged 5-FU administration over 2 h allows the administration of a higher 5-FU dose compared to bolus injection with no apparent improvement in antineoplastic efficacy. The addition of interferon to the combination of 5-FU plus FA in this dose and schedule does not seem to improve the response rate but appears to increase treatment toxicity.     

Oxaliplatin: a review of preclinical and clinical studies

Of the new generation platinum compounds that have been evaluated, those with the 1,2-diaminocyclohexane carrier ligand-including oxaliplatin--have been focused upon in recent years. Molecular biology studies and the National Cancer Institute in vitro cytotoxic screening showed that diaminocyclohexane platinums such as oxaliplatin belong to a distinct cytotoxic family, differing from cisplatin and carboplatin, with specific intracellular target(s), mechanism(s) of action and/or mechanism(s) of resistance. In phase I trials, the dose-limiting toxicity of oxaliplatin was characterized by transient acute dysesthesias and cumulative distal neurotoxicity, which was reversible within a few months after treatment discontinuation. Moreover, oxaliplatin did not display any, auditory, renal and hematologic dose-limiting toxicity at the recommended dose of 130 mg/m2 q three weeks or 85 mg/m2 q two weeks given as a two-hour i.v. infusion. Clinical phase II experiences on the antitumoral activity of oxaliplatin have been conducted in hundreds of patients with advanced colorectal cancers (ACRC). Single agent activity reported as objective response rate in ACRC patients is 10% and 20% overall in ACRC patients with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) pretreated/refractory and previously untreated ACRC, respectively. Synergistic cytotoxic effects in preclinical studies with thymidylate synthase inhibitors, cisplatin/carboplatin and topoisomerase I inhibitors, and the absence of hematologic dose-limiting toxicity have made oxaliplatin an attractive compound for combinations. Phase II trials combining oxaliplatin with 5-FU and folinic acid ACRC patients previously treated/refractory to 5-FU showed overall response rates ranging from 21% to 58%, and survivals ranging from 12 to 17 months. In patients with previously untreated ACRC, combinations of oxaliplatin with 5-FU and folinic acid showed response rates ranging from 34% to 67% and median survivals ranging from 15 to 19 months. Two randomized trials totaling 620 previously untreated patients with ACRC, comparing 5-FU and folinic acid to the same regimen with oxaliplatin, have shown a 34% overall response rate in the oxaliplatin group versus 12% in the 5-FU/folinic acid group for the first trial; and 51.2% vs. 22.6% in the second one. These statistically significant differences were confirmed in time to progression advantage for the oxaliplatin arm (8.7 vs. 6.1 months, and 8.7 vs. 6.1 months, respectively). A small but consistent number of histological complete responses have been reported in patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with the combination of oxaliplatin with 5-FU/folinic acid, and secondary metastasectomy is increasingly done by oncologists familiar with the combination. Based on preclinical and clinical reports showing additive or synergistic effects between oxaliplatin and several anticancer drugs including cisplatin, irinotecan, topotecan, and paclitaxel, clinical trials of combinations with other compounds have been performed or are still ongoing in tumor types in which oxaliplatin alone showed antitumoral activity such as ovarian, non-small-cell lung, breast cancer and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Its single agent and combination therapy data in ovarian cancer confirm its non-cross resistance with cisplatin/carboplatin. While the role of oxaliplatin in medical oncology is yet to be fully defined, it appears to be an important new anticancer agent.     

Translocation (11;14)(q13;q32) and overexpression of cyclin D1 protein in a CD23-positive low-grade B-cell neoplasm

BACKGROUND: Platinum compounds are the most active drugs in ovarian cancer treatment; cisplatin and carboplatin demonstrated similar efficacies but different toxicity profiles. Paclitaxel combined with cisplatin as first-line treatment improved overall survival when compared to a cisplatin-cyclophosphamide combination, but generated higher rates of neutropenia, febrile neutropenia and neurotoxicity. The paclitaxel-carboplatin combination may be better tolerated than cisplatin-paclitaxel. DESIGN: The objective of the present study was to assess the efficacy and safety of the combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin in previously treated advanced ovarian cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: During or after platinum-based chemotherapy, 73 patients with progressive advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma were enrolled to receive every four weeks a three-hour infusion of paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 followed by a 30-minute carboplatin infusion. The carboplatin dose was calculated to obtain the recommended area concentration-versus-time under the curve of 5 mg x ml-1 x min. RESULTS: Toxicity and response could be evaluated for 72 and 62 patients, respectively. Eleven complete and 15 partial responses gave an overall response rate of 42% (95% CI: 30%-54%). Response rates for platinum-refractory patients and those with early (> or = 3 and < 12 months) and late (> 12 months) relapses were 24%, 33% and 70%, respectively. The respective median response duration, the median progression-free survival and median overall survival were 8, 6 and 14 months. Myelosuppression was the most frequent and severe toxicity. Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia occurred, respectively in 30% and 23% of the cycles; 6% of the cycles benefited from medullary growth factors. Only one episode of febrile neutropenia was observed. Grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia occurred, respectively during 3% and 1% of the cycles. Alopecia was frequent. Transient peripheral neuropathy developed in 47% of patients but was severe in only one patient. One early death was attributed to progressive disease and possibly to therapy. CONCLUSION: This combined paclitaxel-carboplatin therapy is effective and can be safely administered to ovarian cancer patients who relapse after one or two regimens of platinum-based chemotherapy.     

One-hour paclitaxel plus carboplatin in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: results of a multicentre, phase II trial

The aim of this phase II study was to determine the activity and toxicity of paclitaxel (administered by 1-h infusion) and carboplatin in advanced non-small cell lung cancer when used in a multicentre, community-based treatment setting. 100 chemotherapy-naive patients with stage IIIB or IV non-small cell lung cancer were treated between March 1995 and February 1996. All patients had Karnofsky performance status 70-100, measurable disease and adequate bone marrow, kidney and liver function. All patients received intravenous (i.v.) paclitaxel 225 mg/m2 by 1-h infusion followed immediately by carboplatin at a targeted area under the concentration time curve (AUC) of 6.0 using the Calvert formula. Courses were repeated every 21 days. Colony stimulating factors were not used routinely. 38 of 94 evaluable patients (40%) had objective responses to treatment (3 complete responses, 35 partial responses). An additional 32 patients had stable disease at initial re-evaluation. Weight gain during treatment was experienced by 47% of patients with objective response or stable disease. The median survival in this group of 100 patients was 8 months, with an actuarial 1-year survival of 42%. Leucopenia was common, but hospitalisation for treatment of neutropenia and fever occurred in only 3% of courses. Cumulative peripheral neuropathy was common, but usually appeared after the third or fourth course and was severe (grade 3) in only 15% of patients. Other grade 3 and 4 toxicity was uncommon. There was one treatment-related death due to sepsis. This large multicentre community-based phase II trial demonstrated the efficacy of paclitaxel and carboplatin combination chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. When paclitaxel is given by 1-h infusion, this regimen is easily administered in the outpatient setting.     

Paclitaxel with mitoxantrone, fluorouracil, and high-dose leucovorin in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer: a phase II trial

PURPOSE: Paclitaxel is a highly active single agent in the treatment of breast cancer. However, its optimal incorporation into combination regimens awaits definition. In this phase II study, we added paclitaxel, administered by 1-hour infusion, to a previously described combination regimen that included mitoxantrone, fluorouracil (5-FU), and high-dose leucovorin (NFL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-six patients with metastatic breast cancer received the following regimen as first- or second-line treatment: paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 by 1-hour intravenous (i.v.) infusion on day 1, mitoxantrone 10 mg/m2 by i.v. bolus on day 1, 5-FU 350 mg2/m by i.v. bolus on days 1, 2, and 3, and leucovorin 300 mg i.v. over 30 to 60 minutes immediately preceding 5-FU on days 1, 2, and 3. Courses were administered at 3-week intervals for a total of eight courses in responding patients. RESULTS: Twenty-three of 45 assessable patients (51%) had major responses. Previous chemotherapy, and in particular previous treatment with doxorubicin, did not affect response rate. The median response duration was 7.5 months. Myelosuppression was moderately severe, with 76% of courses resulting in grade 3 or 4 leukopenia. Hospitalization for treatment of fever during neutropenia was required in 13% of courses, and two patients died as a result of sepsis. Two patients developed severe congestive heart failure after a large cumulative anthracycline dose. CONCLUSION: This combination regimen was active as first- or second-line therapy for metastatic breast cancer, although its activity compared with other combination regimens or with paclitaxel alone is unclear. Myelosuppression was more severe than anticipated based on previous results with the NFL regimen or with paclitaxel administered at this dose and schedule as a single agent. The infrequent development of cardiotoxicity in these patients suggests that the paclitaxel/mitoxantrone combination may not share the problems previously reported with the paclitaxel/doxorubicin combination.     

Paclitaxel in combination chemotherapy with radiotherapy in patients with unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE: The addition of combination chemotherapy to standard radiation therapy has improved treatment for locally unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer. In this phase II study, we evaluated the toxicity and efficacy of a novel chemotherapy regimen that included paclitaxel, cisplatin, and etoposide plus concurrent radiation therapy in this group of patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-three patients with previously untreated, unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (stage IIIA, 11 patients; stage IIIB, 22 patients) initially received two courses of chemotherapy, which included paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 by 1-hour infusion on day 1, cisplatin 60 mg/m/ intravenously (i.v.) on day 2, and etoposide 100 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1, 2 and 3. On week 6, radiation therapy (60 Gy in 30 fractions) was initiated in conjunction with two additional courses of chemotherapy: paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 i.v. by 1-hour infusion on day 1, cisplatin 5 mg/m2 i.v. on days 2- to 10, and etoposide 25 mg/m2 on days 1 to 10. RESULTS: This combined modality program was feasible and well tolerated by most patients. During the two courses of induction chemotherapy, grade 3 or 4 myelosuppression occurred in only six patients (18%). Esophagitis was common during combined modality therapy (grade 3, 10 patients; grade 4 five patients). Forty-two percent of patients had partial response after two courses of induction therapy, and 82% of patients had an objective response at completion of therapy. Twelve patients (36%) had a complete response. Nineteen patients remain progression-free at a median of 8 months; the median survival time has not been reached. CONCLUSION: This paclitaxel-containing combined modality therapy is feasible and highly active in patients with inoperable stage III lung cancer. Esophagitis is the most common severe toxicity with this program. Further studies with paclitaxel-containing combination regimens in patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer are indicated.     

A pilot study of gamma-1b-interferon in combination with fluorouracil, leucovorin, and alpha-2a-interferon

The combination of IFN-alpha-2a (IFN-alpha) and IFN-gamma-1b (IFN-gamma) has been found to produce more than additive cytotoxicity with fluorouracil (5-FU) in HT 29 colon cancer cells due to enhanced DNA-directed effects. We therefore studied the combination of IFN-gamma with IFN-alpha, 5-FU, and leucovorin (LV) in a clinical trial. Fifty-three patients received an initial cycle of 5 million units (MU)/m2 IFN-alpha s.c. on days 1-7 with 500 mg/m2 LV and 370 mg/m2 5-FU i.v. on days 2-6. IFN-gamma was then added once tolerable doses of 5-FU and IFN-alpha were established for each patient. IFN-gamma was administered at one of six dose levels between 0.3-4.8 MU/m2 s.c. on days 1-7. This design permitted comparison of the clinical toxicity and pharmacokinetics of 5-FU in two consecutive cycles in an individual treated with the same doses of 5-FU/LV/IFN-alpha in the absence and presence of IFN-gamma. In 43 matched patient cycles, the addition of IFN-gamma did not seem to worsen gastrointestinal toxicity, and skin toxicity tended to be milder. 5-FU clearance was higher in 14 cycles with IFN-gamma compared to the patient's prior cycle with the same doses of 5-FU/LV/IFN-alpha: 798 +/- 309 versus 601 +/- 250 ml/min/m2 (mean +/- SD; P = 0.04). In these 28 cycles, the median 5-FU clearance was significantly lower in 11 cycles that were complicated by more severe diarrhea: 524 versus 798 ml/min/m2 (grade 2 versus 0-1; P = 0. 0032). Overall, 38% and 26% of patients had grade 3-4 diarrhea and mucositis. Dose reductions of IFN-gamma for chronic fatigue, malaise, or anorexia were ultimately required more frequently with >/=2.4 MU/m2 (P = 0.018), and the maximum tolerated dose of IFN-gamma was considered to be 1.2 MU/m2/ day. Objective responses were seen in 41% of 29 measurable colorectal cancer patients. Compared to our previous experience with 5-FU/LV/IFN-alpha, IFN-gamma and IFN-alpha appeared to have opposite effects on 5-FU clearance. These results suggest that any potential benefit of adding IFN-alpha to 5-FU/LV on this schedule may not depend solely on alterations in 5-FU clearance.     

Dynamic imaging of the normal pelvic floor

PURPOSE: To present tolerance and toxicity information on previously untreated high-risk early-stage and advanced-stage primary epithelial ovarian cancer patients treated with adjuvant 3-hour paclitaxel and carboplatin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients with high-risk early-stage and advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer underwent maximal surgical debulking and/or staging. Paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) was infused over 3 hours followed by a 30-minute carboplatin infusion (area under the plasma concentration time curve = 7.0-7.5 mg/mL/min) for a planned six (q 21 day) courses. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients underwent 132 cycles and were evaluable for toxicity. Myelosuppression was dose-limiting. Grade 4 granulocytopenia occurred in 31% of the cycles. Grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia was uncommon (5%, 1%) and predictable. Delay in administration was necessary in 10 of 132 (7.6%) cycles (5 of 22 patients). Eight of these 10 delays were 7 days. Seventeen of 22 (77%) patients completed therapy without a delay. Non-hematologic toxicity was mild. A significant individual weight gain of 2.5 kg was noted. Among 19 patients with advanced disease, 16 had a complete clinical remission after six cycles of therapy. Nine patients with stage IIB-IV disease have undergone reassessment procedures (four pathologic complete responses, three microscopic positive, two macroscopic positive). Sixteen of 22 (77%) have no evidence of disease, four have no evidence of disease following a secondary therapy, one is under therapy with salvage chemotherapy, and one is dead of disease. Median follow-up is 14 months (range: 6-30 months). Comparatively, the mean carboplatin dose administered was 440 mg/m2 (95% CI, 428-486 mg/m2). CONCLUSION: Paclitaxel and carboplatin administered in this design are well tolerated, with predictable and acceptable hematologic and nonhematologic toxicity. Dose-limiting toxicity is granulocytopenia with relative platelet sparing. Outpatient administration is safe.     

Development of a biochemotherapy regimen with concurrent administration of cisplatin, vinblastine, dacarbazine, interferon alfa, and interleukin-2 for patients with metastatic melanoma

PURPOSE: To evaluate the antitumor activity and toxicity of concurrent biochemotherapy that uses cisplatin, vinblastine, and docarbazine (DTIC) (CVD) in combination with interferon alfa-2a (IFN-alpha) and interleukin-2 (IL-2) in patients with metastatic melanoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between October 1992 and October 1993, 53 patients with a documented diagnosis of metastatic melanoma with measurable lesions and an Eastern Oncology Cooperative Group (ECOG) performance status of 2 or less were enrolled onto this study. Patients were required to have no clinically significant cardiac dysfunction and to be free from symptomatic brain metastases. The treatment consisted of cisplatin 20 mg/m2 daily for 4 days; vinblastine 1.6 mg/m2 daily for 4 days; and DTIC 800 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) day 1 with IL-2 9 x 10(6) IU/m2 i.v. by continuous infusion daily for 4 days and IFN-alpha 5 x 10(6) U/m2 subcutaneously daily for 5 days, repeated at 21-day intervals. Response was assessed after two cycles and patients who responded were continued on treatment for a total of six cycles. RESULTS: Among 53 assessable patients, 11 patients (21%) achieved a complete response (CR) and 23 patients (43%) achieved a partial response (PR), for an overall objective response rate of 64%. The median time to disease progression for all patients was 5 months. The median survival of all patients entered onto the trial was 11.8 months. Among the 11 patients who achieved a CR, five patients (9%) have remained in continuous CR for 50+ to 61+ months. The toxicity of biochemotherapy consisted of severe myelosuppression, significant nausea and vomiting, and moderately severe hypotension that required inpatient hospital care for each 5-day cycle of treatment. There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSION: Concurrent biochemotherapy for patients with advanced melanoma is capable of producing high CR and overall response rates and resulted in durable complete remissions in a small fraction of patients. Toxicity, although severe, was manageable in a routine inpatient hospital environment.