Possible in vivo tolerance of human polymorphonuclear neutrophil to low-grade exercise-induced endotoxaemia

Splenic injury is the most common abdominal organ injury in children who sustain blunt trauma and may result from apparently minor injuries. We present two cases of delayed diagnosis of splenic injury in children who fell from a moderate height of less than 10 feet. Careful physical examination and close follow-up with reevaluation are necessary to identify children with possible splenic injury after relatively minor blunt trauma.     

Contribution of imaging in closed thoracic trauma

Conventional or digital chest radiographs are usually efficient for diagnosis of minor chest trauma. The primary modality for diagnostic evaluation of severe blunt chest trauma remains chest X-ray. Other imaging modalities especially CT have to be performed. The management of these patients is based upon clinical and initial radiographic findings.     

Immediate surgical treatment of major renal trauma

Of the 77 cases of renal trauma treated at Oulu University Central Hospital during the years 1965--1975, 60 injuries were minor and 17 severe. 73 of these injuries were closed and 4 penetrating. The rate of operative treatment in severe renal injuries was 88% minor renal injuries being treated conservatively. Primary exploration was done in 18 of the 77 cases and in all patients with penetrating injuries. Only 7 of the 73 patients with blunt trauma and one of the 4 patients with penetrating injury required nephrectomy, including one patient with renal carcinoma. 6 of the 77 patients died, most as a result of severe associated injuries, giving a mortality of 8%. None of the surviving patients treated for renal trauma suffered from major complications. In 13 of the 18 patients operated upon, renal injury was the main indication for operation. Operation was performed in 5 of the 18 patients after immediate radiological evaluation. The advantages of immediate surgical management in severe renal injuries are early and final treatment, short hospital stay, and low incidence of complications. Qualifications for emergency surgery are access to renal angiography and familiarity with reparative renal procedures.     

Incidence of unsuspected blunt carotid artery injury

OBJECTIVE: This study attempts to document the incidence of unsuspected blunt carotid artery injury (BCI) in a prospective series of consecutive blunt trauma patients undergoing angiographic evaluation of the aorta. Previous studies have included mainly patients who became symptomatic from BCI, thus documenting a "detected incidence." METHODS: During a 22-month period, all patients undergoing angiographic evaluation of the aorta after blunt trauma who were not felt to be at increased risk for BCI were included in the screening protocol. All patients initially suspected of BCI were studied outside the protocol. Angiographic evaluation of the carotid arteries was performed using nonselective contrast injections after aortic injury had been ruled out. RESULTS: The incidence of BCI among those patients screened under the protocol (n = 119) was 2.5% (3 of 119). Among all patients undergoing aortic evaluation at presentation (n = 171), the detected incidence of BCI was 3.5% (6 of 171). The detected incidence of BCI among all patients during the study period was 0.32% (10 of 3174). No risk factors for BCI were identified beyond the severity of trauma that led to aortic evaluation. CONCLUSION: The incidence of BCI found in those patients screened in this study, nearly 10 times the incidence of BCI in our blunt trauma population overall, suggests that these patients represent a subgroup on which to focus screening efforts, regardless of the diagnostic tools employed. The similarity between the angiographic incidence and the detected incidence of BCI in this study argues that few BCIs remain asymptomatic. All blunt trauma patients injured sufficiently to prompt aortic evaluation at presentation should be screened in some manner for BCI.     

Carotid artery occlusion due to bacterial paranasal sinusitis

BACKGROUND: Many experts have suggested that blunt splenic trauma in patients older than 55 years should not be managed by observation because of supposed increased fragility of the spleen and decreased physiologic reserve in elderly patients. We sought to determine the outcome of nonoperative management of blunt splenic trauma in patients older than 55 years. METHODS: For the years 1994 through 1996, data for patients with splenic injury older than 55 years from seven trauma centers in a single state were reviewed. RESULTS: Blunt splenic trauma occurred in 41 patients older than 55 years. Eight patients were excluded from further analysis because of death from massive associated injuries within 24 hours of admission. The remaining 33 patients (mean age, 72+/-10 years) were divided into two groups: immediate exploration (10 patients) and observation (23 patients). Observation of blunt splenic injury failed in 4 of 23 patients (17%). No patient deaths were related to the method of management of the splenic injury. CONCLUSIONS: Observation of the elderly patient with blunt splenic trauma has an acceptable failure rate of 17%.     

Occlusive arterial disease of the hand due to repetitive blunt trauma: a review with illustrative cases

OBJECTIVE: to increase clinical awareness of the role of repetitive blunt trauma, often occupational, in the development of occlusive arterial disease of the hand. STUDY DESIGN: illustrative cases are presented to emphasize the varied etiology and clinical features of occlusive arterial disease of the hand resulting from repetitive blunt trauma and an historical review of the literature is presented. RESULTS: Occlusive arterial disease of the hand due to repetitive blunt trauma is a common but often preventable disorder. The superficial location of many of the arteries of the hands and digits plus their close proximity to the bones of the hand makes them uniquely susceptible to injury from repetitive blunt trauma. An ever increasing number of occupations and leisure activities have been causally related to occlusive arterial disease of the hand. The diagnosis of occupational occlusive arterial disease due to blunt trauma is suggested by eliciting a history of repetitive blunt trauma to the hand in a patient with symptoms and/or signs of digital ischemia. The dominant hand is most commonly involved, but the non-dominant hand or both hands are affected in certain occupations. Possible predisposing or aggravating factors include tobacco use and working in a cold environment. The diagnosis of occlusive arterial disease confined to the hand or digits is confirmed by non-invasive studies in the vascular laboratory and demonstrated by arteriography. Conservative measures and protection of the hand from further trauma is sufficient for most patients, with surgical therapy being reserved for patients refractory to medical therapy or those with more severe ischemia. CONCLUSION: occlusive arterial disease of the hand may be more common than formerly thought and is often preventable by the proper use of hand tools or instruments and hand protection. This is another type of occlusive arterial disease in which tobacco may be a predisposing or aggravating factor.     

Splenic injury in children: a 10 year experience

The aim of this report was to review retrospectively the management of splenic trauma at a major Australian tertiary referral centre (Westmead Hospital) over a 10 year period. Forty-nine patients (0-15 years of age) with documented blunt splenic trauma were identified. The causes of splenic injury were road trauma (73%) and falls (27%). There were 22 minor injuries (Injury severity score [ISS] < 16) and 27 severe injuries (ISS > or = 16). All nine deaths were related to road trauma (mean ISS = 59). The investigation most commonly used was CT scanning (47%). Peritoneal lavage was performed in six patients (12%). Management involved non-operative care in 29 patients (57%), exploratory laparotomy alone in 5 (10%), splenic salvage in 2 (4%) and splenectomy in 13 (26%). This experience supports the view that non-operative management of splenic injury in haemodynamically stable children is safe and is the preferred treatment. Experienced assessment and meticulous observation is necessary. Laparotomy is indicated if there is continuing haemodynamic instability despite resuscitation. Operative management is aimed at splenic salvage with splenectomy being reserved for uncontrolled haemorrhage.     

Endovascular treatment of traumatic and iatrogenic intrarenal arterial lesions by microcoil embolization

Selective embolization is the best treatment for intrarenal arterial lesions due to trauma or percutaneous procedures with non-controlled or recurrent haematuria. Three male patients, aged 20-70 (mean 49 years), were recently treated in our institution by means of arterial embolization with microcoils. Two patients presented a pseudo-aneurysm and an arterio-venous fistula secondary to percutaneous nephrolithotomy and one patient presented an isolated pseudo-aneurysm due to trauma. In the 3 cases, haematuria (associated with retroperitoneal haemhorrage in one case) was not controlled and required repeated units of blood. Embolization allowed definitive treatment of these lesions. One of our patients with a solitary functional kidney presented rapidly increasing renal failure which completely resolved after arterial embolization. We think that microcoils are the embolic agents of choice to perform endovascular treatment in this indication.     

Paramedic judgment of the need for trauma team activation for pediatric patients

OBJECTIVE: To determine the value of paramedic judgment in determining the need for trauma team activation (TA) for pediatric blunt trauma patients. METHODS: A prospective, observational study was conducted at the ED of Children's Hospital Medical Center of Akron between July 12, 1996, and February 28, 1997, in cooperation with Akron Fire Department emergency medical technician-paramedics (EMT-Ps). The ED provides on-line and off-line medical control for pediatric transports. Patients with minor or no identifiable injuries are released at the scene with the instructions to see a physician. The remainder are transported to the ED. The decision for TTA is based on ED trauma protocols as well as emergency physician judgment of injury severity in combination with the judgment of the treating paramedic. During the study, EMT-Ps were asked (before physician input) whether, based solely on their judgment, a patient needed TTA. Patients 0-14 years old who were involved in motor vehicle crashes, bike crashes, or falls from a height of >10 feet were included in the study. TTA was defined as necessary if the patient was admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) or operating room (OR) for nonorthopedic surgical procedures. Out-of-hospital, ED, and hospital records were reviewed. Coroners' records as well as medical records of all trauma admissions during the study period were reviewed to ensure that the patients released at the scene were not mistriaged. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-two patients met study criteria. Eighty-five patients (44%) were transported to the ED, of whom 12 had TTA. EMT-Ps requested TTA for 10 of these patients, and 2 patients had TTA per ED trauma protocol. Two of the patients who were judged by EMT-Ps to need TTA were admitted to the ICU/OR, and neither of the patients identified by ED trauma protocol to require TTA were admitted to the ICU/OR. Two initially stable patients who did not have TTA deteriorated after arrival to the ED. Both were admitted to the ICU. The sensitivity and specificity of paramedic judgment of the need for TTA for pediatric blunt trauma patients were 50% (95% CI 9.2-90.8) and 87.7% (95% CI 78.0-93.6), respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 16.7% (95% CI 2.9-49.1) and 97.3% (95% CI 89.6-99.5). None of the patients released at the scene was mistriaged based on the review of the coroners' and trauma admission records. CONCLUSION: Results of this investigation indicate that a small percentage of pediatric blunt trauma patients require TTA. EMT-P judgment alone of the need for TTA for pediatric blunt trauma patients is not sufficiently sensitive to be of clinical use. The low sensitivity is explained by the deterioration in the clinical condition of 2 initially stable patients. The paramedic disposition decisions from the scene were always accurate. Nontransport by emergency medical services (EMS) may be acceptable in some uninjured pediatric trauma patients. Injured pediatric trauma patients who appear to be stable may deteriorate shortly after injury. However, if a pediatric patient appears injured, transport from the scene and examination by a trauma specialist are needed. Finally, the role of paramedic judgment must be further defined by larger studies with urban, rural, and suburban EMS systems before it can be used as a sole predictor of TTA.     

Gallbladder injury in abdominal trauma: analysis of 32 cases

Gallbladder lesion is infrequent, occurring in approximately 0.5 to 8.5% of all patients with blunt and penetrating abdominal trauma. The incidence of gallbladder injury in such cases is low. This study reviewed 32 patients with gallbladder injury due to abdominal trauma over a 6-year period to determine the complications, associated injuries, and mortality rate.     

Ultrasound evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma: program implementation, initial experience, and learning curve

OBJECTIVE: Although sonographic screening for blunt abdominal trauma is gaining acceptance, standards for implementation, training, credentialing, and quality control remain to be established. DESIGN: This prospective study examines a Level I trauma service experience with the de novo establishment of a trauma ultrasound (US) program credentialed through the Department of Surgery under the auspices of Continuous Quality Improvement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All trauma surgeons attended a combined didactic and "hands on" 8-hour trauma US course. Abdominal sonography was subsequently performed on patients with potential blunt abdominal trauma followed by a standard diagnostic evaluation, which included computed tomographic scan, diagnostic peritoneal lavage, or observation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Three hundred patients were studied over a 4-month period. They averaged 35 years of age with an average injury severity score of 12. The time required to perform the US examination averaged less than 3 minutes. Standard diagnostic evaluation included computed tomographic scan (21%), diagnostic peritoneal lavage (45%), and observation (34%). US examinations resulted in 277 true negatives, 17 true positives, two false positives, and four false negatives for a sensitivity of 81.0%, a specificity of 99.3%, and an accuracy of 98.0%. Annualized cost savings with the use of US evaluation versus standard diagnostic evaluation would amount to over $100,000.00. CONCLUSIONS: This experience with the de novo implementation of a trauma US program suggests that the training and credentialing requirements in this study are sufficient to provide surgeon ultrasonographers with acceptable competence in US diagnosis of blunt abdominal trauma.     

Value of thoracic computed tomography in the first assessment of severely injured patients with blunt chest trauma: results of a prospective study

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate whether early thoracic computed tomography (TCT) is superior to routine chest x-ray (CXR) in the diagnostic work-up of blunt thoracic trauma and whether the additional information influences subsequent therapeutic decisions on the early management of severely injured patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a prospective study of 103 consecutive patients with clinical or radiologic signs of chest trauma (94 multiple injured patients with chest trauma, nine patients with isolated chest trauma), an average Injury Severity Score of 30 and an average Abbreviated Injury Scale thorax score of 3, initial CXR and TCT were compared after initial assessment in our emergency department of a Level I trauma center. RESULTS: In 67 patients (65%) TCT detected major chest trauma complications that have been missed on CXR (lung contusion (n = 33), pneumothorax (n = 27), residual pneumothorax after chest tube placement (n = 7), hemothorax (n = 21), displaced chest tube (n = 5), diaphragmatic rupture (n = 2), myocardial rupture (n = 1)). In 11 patients only minor additional pathologic findings (dystelectasis, small pleural effusion) were visualized on TCT, and in 14 patients CXR and TCT showed the same pathologic results. Eleven patients underwent both CXR and TCT without pathologic fundings. The TCT scan was significantly more effective than routine CXR in detecting lung contusions (p < 0.001), pneumothorax (p < 0.005), and hemothorax (p < 0.05). In 42 patients (41%) the additional TCT findings resulted in a change of therapy: chest tube placement, chest tube correction of pneumothoraces or large hemothoraces (n = 31), change in mode of ventilation and respiratory care (n = 14), influence on the management of fracture stabilization (n = 12), laparotomy in cases of diaphragmatic lacerations (n = 2), bronchoscopy for atelectasis (n = 2), exclusion of aortic rupture (n = 2), endotracheal intubation (n = 1), and pericardiocentesis (n = 1). To evaluate the efficacy of all those therapeutic changes after TCT the rates of respiratory failure, adult respiratory distress syndrome, and mortality in the subgroup of patients with Abbreviated Injury Scale thorax score of > 2 were compared with a historical control group, consisting of 84 patients with multiple trauma and with blunt chest trauma Abbreviated Injury Scale thorax score of > 2, prospectively studied between 1986 and 1992. Age (38 vs. 39 years), average Injury Severity Score (33 vs. 38), and the rate of respiratory failure (36 vs. 56%) were not statistically different between the two groups, but the rates of adult respiratory distress syndrome (8 vs. 20%; p < 0.05) and mortality (10 vs. 21%; p < 0.05) were significantly reduced in the TCT group. CONCLUSIONS: TCT is highly sensitive in detecting thoracic injuries after blunt chest trauma and is superior to routine CXR in visualzing lung contusions, pneumothorax, and hemothorax. Early TCT influences therapeutic management in a significant number of patients. We therefore recommend TCT in the initial diagnostic work-up of patients with multiple injuries and with suspected chest trauma because early and exact diagnosis of all thoracic injuries along with sufficient therapeutic consequences may reduce complications and improve outcome of severely injured patients with blunt chest trauma.     

Management of splenic trauma at a rural, Level I trauma center

The spleen is the most commonly injured organ in blunt abdominal trauma. There remains much controversy in the diagnosis and management of the injured spleen, with a recent trend toward nonoperative management. A 5-year period was reviewed at a rural, Level I trauma center to address issues of operative versus nonoperative management. During this time period, there were 136 patients identified as having trauma to the spleen. Most (95%) were the result of blunt trauma, and a majority of these were from motor vehicle accidents. Computed tomography was the most frequent method of diagnosis. Approximately half of the patients underwent immediate operative intervention. Of those initially observed, 10 patients (16%) eventually were operated on. Most of the cases were due to underestimation of the severity of the splenic injury, and most received blood transfusion. This experience suggests that observation for splenic trauma is appropriate in many cases, as long as the surgeon is certain the spleen is not actively bleeding and the patient will not require blood transfusion.     

The feasibility of organ salvage from non-heart-beating trauma donors

BACKGROUND: Blunt trauma patients without vital signs on admission are potential non-heart-beating donors. OBJECTIVE: To review the feasibility of postmortem visceral perfusion and organ donation in blunt trauma patients without vital signs. DESIGN: A retrospective case series of blunt trauma victims who were declared dead in the emergency department. SETTING: A level I trauma center. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Factors potentially precluding donation and potential donor yield. RESULTS: The mean trauma-to-death interval was 71 minutes (< 60 minutes in 57% of the cases). Injuries likely to interfere with in situ perfusion were present in 41% of the cases. The tissue donation consent rate was 45%. Assuming a similar organ donation consent rate, the potential donor yield was 9% after excluding victims who were younger than 60 years of age, warm ischemia times that were less than 60 minutes, and patients who had injuries precluding perfusion. CONCLUSIONS: The potential organ yield from non-heart-beating, blunt trauma victims is low, which highlights the ethical and legal problems of this approach.     

Diagnosis and management of blunt abdominal trauma

The records of 437 patients with blunt abdominal trauma admitted to Charity Hospital, New Orleans, from 1967-1973 have been reviewed and computer-analyzed. There was an 80% increase in the incidence of blunt abdominal trauma when compared with the preceding 15-year experience. Forty-three per cent of all the patients presented with no specific complaint or sign of injury. Blunt abdominal injury was usually diagnosed preoperatively using conventional methods including history, physical examination, and routine laboratory tests and x-rays. Abdominal paracentesis via a Potter needle had an 86% accuracy. The incidence and management of specific organ injuries with associated morbidity and mortality have been discussed. Mortality and morbidity continue to be significant in blunt abdominal trauma. Isolated abdominal injuries rarely (5%) resulted in death, even though abdominal injuries accounted for 41% of all deaths. Associated injuries, especially head injury, greatly increased the risk. The insidious nature of blunt abdominal injury is borne out by the fact that more than one-third of the "asymptomatic" patients had an abdominal organ injured. A high index of suspicion and an adequate observation period therefore are mandatory for proper care of patients subjected to blunt trauma.     

Blunt renal traumas: contribution of spiral CT with three dimensional reconstruction to the surgical decision process?

Spiral CT has proved to be a valuable tool by providing various kinds of three-dimensional (3D) images of the studied structures. Such 3D images, which offer a more realistic depiction of the lesions, could be of interest for surgeons who are attempting to treat conservatively blunt abdominal traumas and lead to less inappropriate triage between conservative and operative management particularly for renal trauma. A good working relationship between surgeons and radiologists allowed us to perform an early follow-up 3D spiral CT on a commercially available spiral CT scanner. In the first adult patient, the 3D CT demonstrated minor spleen injury associated with severe lacerations of the left kidney with complete separation of the kidney lower pole. A delayed partial lower nephrectomy was performed. For the second 12-year-old patient presenting with severe spleen trauma and macroscopic hematuria, the 3D CT accurately documented the spleen and renal lesions that were safely amenable to nonoperative treatment. For hemodynamically stable patients, 3D CT is a potentially helpful addition to conventional axial CT for quantifying blunt renal traumas and for making the strategic choice between nonoperative, emergency or delayed surgical treatment.     

Blunt abdominal trauma

Assessment and management of patients with blunt abdominal trauma remains a challenge for emergency physicians. The spectrum of injury ranges from the trivial to the catastrophic and the initial assessment, resuscitation, and investigation of patients with abdominal trauma must be individualized. This article covers the important aspects of patient history and physical examination and addresses the relevant investigative tools available. An approach to the assessment of patients with abdominal trauma is provided; the goal is to diagnose significant injuries as soon as possible and avoid the pitfall of a delayed or missed diagnosis.     

Expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase in the brains of scrapie-infected mice

Thoracic trauma in the elderly population constitutes a major challenge for both thoracic and trauma surgeons as their presentation and outcomes differ from the adult population in addition to their high morbidity and mortality. One hundred and one patients, 60 years of age or older, with thoracic trauma were treated at Dicle University School of Medicine during a 6-year period. Eighty-five per cent were male and 15% were female with a mean age of 64.5 years. The cause of thoracic injury was blunt in 77.2% and penetrating in 22.8% of the patients. Sixty-two patients (61.4%) had isolated thoracic injuries. The median Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 23. The morbidity rate was 23.8%. The mortality rate was 16.8%. Seven of 10 patients (70%) who had an ISS greater than 25 died, whereas six of 24 (25%) patients with an ISS between 17 and 25, and four of 67 (5.9%) patients with an ISS less than 16 died. In the elderly the morbidity and mortality rates were higher for blunt trauma compared with penetrating trauma. For ISS greater than 25 the mortality rate was 71.4% for blunt and 66.6% for penetrating trauma. As the morbidity and mortality rate are significantly higher in the elderly patients the approach to these patients should include recognition of their high risk for morbidity and mortality, especially for those who had an ISS greater than 25.     

Nonoperative management of liver and/or splenic injuries: effect on resident surgical experience

Changes in the management of trauma over the past few years are significantly affecting postgraduate surgical education, with the lack of operative trauma experience being a major concern in some programs. This problem is accentuated in residency programs that obtain their trauma caseload primarily from blunt injury. Our experience over the past 6 years confirms that the growing trend toward nonoperative management of blunt liver and spleen injuries in adults is likely to exacerbate this problem. Blunt trauma admissions to our Level I trauma center increased from 2888 from 1991 through 1993 (group A) to 3587 from 1994 through 1996 (group B). Liver and/or splenic injuries occurred with equal frequency in both groups. Whereas diagnostic peritoneal lavage was used in 26 per cent of group A, its use dropped to 2 per cent in group B as abdominal computerized tomography was used more frequently to evaluate these patients. Nonoperative management increased from 10 per cent of group A to 54 per cent of group B. As a result, therapeutic laparotomies dropped from 85 in group A (58% of patients with liver/splenic injuries) to 74 (35%) in group B and nontherapeutic laparotomies from 48 (33%) to 23 (11%). While the evolution in the management of blunt liver and splenic injuries has resulted in the avoidance of nontherapeutic laparotomies, the operative caseload available to surgical housestaff has been adversely affected. Although the Residency Review Committee has stressed the importance of the critical care management of these patients, the criteria used to evaluate the number of trauma cases in postgraduate surgical education may need to be revised.     

The intake of proteins and essential amino acids in top-competing women athletes]

PURPOSE: The literature on diagnostic peritoneal lavage in the assessment of blunt abdominal trauma reflects an ongoing controversy. Therefore we conducted a prospective evaluation of the diagnostic management of blunt abdominal trauma used at our clinic, in which this procedure plays a substantial role. During the years 1993 and 1994 a total of 75 patients could be included in the study. The study population consisted of all patients with a diagnosis of blunt abdominal trauma. In addition, all trauma patients who were unresponsive on admission to the emergency receiving unit underwent the same program of diagnostic work-up. This group included polytraumatized patients, patients with craniocerebral injuries and all those who had been intubated prior to admission. Patients with stable vital signs were evaluated first by sonography of the abdomen, whereas those showing signs of hypovolemic shock received a diagnostic peritoneal lavage as the first evaluation of abdominal trauma. In order to assess the relative value of the two diagnostic methods, all patients who had had ultrasound as their first examination subsequently also underwent peritoneal lavage. RESULTS: 37 patients (49%) had lavage evidence of intraperitoneal bleeding. Of these 22 (29% of the total) subsequently underwent emergency laparotomy with lesions requiring surgical treatment found in 21 (95%). Only in one patient (1.3% of the study population) laparotomy failed to reveal a lesion requiring surgical correction. The accuracy of peritoneal lavage findings as an indication for laparotomy was 99%, compared to 82% for ultrasonography used as a initial diagnostic procedure. Diagnostic peritoneal lavage is quick, safe and almost independent of the experience of the investigating physician. It can be performed during other diagnostic procedures and can be repeated at will. If beyond macroscopical evaluation the lavage fluid is assessed chemically, even duodenal and pancreatic lesions as well as injuries to other hollow viscera can be suspected. With a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 98%, diagnostic peritoneal lavage is an extremely reliable diagnostic tool. It should be used as the initial diagnostic procedure in all hypovolemic and/or unresponsive patients suspected of having suffered blunt abdominal trauma. In conscious patients with stable vital signs, ultrasonography can be used for initial diagnosis. It should, however, be complemented by subsequent peritoneal lavage whenever the clinical course gives rise to suspicion.