共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
Meng-Shu Chiang Chung-Ming Huang Pham Binh Chau Shouzhi Xu Huan Zhou Dong Ren 《Telecommunication Systems》2017,65(4):699-715
Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) is a networked-based handover protocol for the IP layer, i.e., the layer 3 mobility management protocol. In this work, we integrate fast handover and IEEE 802.21 Media Independent Handover (MIH) Services with PMIPv6 to improve the handover performance over the heterogeneous wireless network environment. Since it may have multiple candidate destination networks to which a Mobile Node can select for handover, it needs to consider not only the signal strength but also the corresponding networking situation for the proper selection of the next network. To reduce the packet loss situation, the multicast mechanism is adopted to forward packets to these candidate destination networks during the handover processing period. In this work, a Forward Fast Media Independent Handover Control Scheme for Proxy Mobile IPv6 (FFMIH-PMIPv6) is proposed based on the aforementioned concerns. Through the simulations for performance analysis, it shows that the proposed FFMIH-PMIPv6 can have better handover performance in terms of handover latency, packet loss rate and throughput. 相似文献
2.
快速层次移动IPv6切换性能分析及优化 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
移动IPv6技术中切换延时对实时应用影响很大。介绍了目前移动IPv6常用的快速移动和层次移动切换技术,描述其切换原理和过程。结合2种技术的优缺点,给出了一种新的快速层次移动IPv6的切换方案。利用NS-2对这3种切换方法进行仿真得到的结果表明,快速层次移动IPv6切换延时要小于快速移动IPv6和层次移动IPv6的切换延时,且降低了数据包丢失率,提高了网络的性能。 相似文献
3.
Yi Sun Yucheng Zhang Yilin Song Eryk Dutkiewicz 《Wireless Personal Communications》2011,60(4):769-807
In recent years, with the development of mobile communication technologies and the increase of available wireless transmission
bandwidth, deploying multimedia services in next generation mobile IPv6 networks has become an inevitable trend. RSVP (resource
reservation protocol) proposed by the IETF is designed for hardwired and fixed networks and can not be used in mobile environments.
This paper proposes a protocol, called Fast RSVP, to reserve resources for mobile IPv6. The protocol adopts a cross-layer
design approach where two modules (RSVP module and Mobile IPv6 module) at different layers cooperate with each other. Fast
RSVP divides a handover process with QoS guarantees into two stages: (1) setup of the resource reservation neighbor tunnel
and (2) resource reservation on the optimized route. It can help a mobile node realize fast handover with QoS guarantees as
well as avoid resource wasting by triangular routes, advanced reservations and duplicate reservations. In addition, fast RSVP
reserves “guard channels” for handover sessions, thus greatly reducing the handover session forced termination rate while
maintaining high performance of the network. Based on extensive performance analysis and simulations, Fast RSVP, compared
with existing methods of resource reservation in mobile environments, performs better in terms of packet delay and throughput
during handover, QoS recovery time after handover, resource reservation cost, handover session forced termination rate and
overall session completion rate. 相似文献
4.
Excellent handover performance is essential for deploying real time applications over wireless Internets. In this paper, this study present a novel handover scheme for Mobile IPv6. The proposed scheme is based on an infrastructure, which is called Cross-layer Address Resolution (CAR). A smart message interaction for the Binding Update procedure is also introduced. The prototype is illustrated first and a buffering approach adopted to achieve zero packet loss. The proposed scheme, which is called Seamless Handover for Mobile IPv6 (S-MIPv6), evolved from Fast Handover for Mobile IPv6 (F-MIPv6). The problems in F-MIPv6, such as triangle route and sequence disorder, are solved by the proposed scheme. The S-MIPv6 avoids building tunnels and reduces registration delay. It is capable of cooperating with a Mobility Anchor Point (MAP) to take advantage from hierarchical networks. The S-MIPv6 is modeled and simulated. In a practical case, the disruption duration is close to the Data Link layer handover latency (50–100 ms). We believe that the proposed S-MIPv6 is capable of providing seamless handover for time critical services. 相似文献
5.
XU Kai JI Hong YUE Guang-xin Telecommunication Engineering School Beijing University of Posts Telecommunications Beijing P.R. China 《中国邮电高校学报(英文版)》2004,11(Z1)
1 Introduction MobileIPv6requirestheMobileNode (MN)toregisterwiththeHomeAgent (HA)andtheCorre spondentNode (CN)whenitchangesitspointofattachmentintheInternet[1~ 3] .Therefore ,thiscauseMobileIPv6toincurlongdelayintheregis tration process,andaddsignalingtraffictothebackbonenetworkespeciallywhentheHAandCNarefarawayfromtheMN .Inordertominimizethisdelay ,andthesignalingoverhead presentinMobileIPv6,literatures[4~7] proposeHierarchicalMobileIPv6(HMIPv6)architectureandafasthan dover… 相似文献
6.
Mohammed Balfaqih Mahamod Ismail Rosdiadee Nordin Abd Alrazak Rahem Zain Balfaqih 《Telecommunication Systems》2017,64(2):325-346
The current IP mobility protocols are called centralized mobility management (CMM) solutions, in which all data traffic and management signaling messages must be forwarded to an anchor entity. In some vehicle scenarios, vehicles may move as a group from one roadside unit to another (i.e., after traffic lights or traffic jams). This causes data traffic and exchanged mobility messages to peak at the anchor entity and, consequently, affects the network performance. A new design paradigm aimed at addressing the anchor entity issue is called distributed mobility management (DMM); it is an IETF proposal that is still being actively discussed by the IETF DMM working group. Nevertheless, network-based DMM is designed based on the well-known network-based CMM protocol Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6). There is no significant difference between network-based DMM and PMIPv6 in terms of handover latency and packet loss. Because vehicles change their roadside unit frequently in this context, the IP addresses of mobile users (MUs) require fast IP handover management to configure a new IP address without disrupting ongoing sessions. Thus, this paper proposes the Fast handover for network-based DMM (FDMM) based on the Fast Handover for PMIPv6 (PFMIPv6). Several modifications to PFMIPv6 are required to adapt this protocol to DMM. This paper specifies the necessary extensions to support the scenario in which an MU has old IP flows and hence has multiple anchor entities. In addition, the analytic expressions required to evaluate and compare the handover performance of the proposed FDMM and the IETF network-based DMM have been derived. The numerical results show that FDMM outperforms the IETF network-based DMM in terms of handover latency, session recovery and packet loss at the cost of some extra signaling. 相似文献
7.
In this paper, we analyze the IPv6 handover over wireless LANs. Mobile IPv6 is designed to manage mobile nodes movements between wireless IPv6 networks. Nevertheless, a mobile node cannot receive IP packets on its new point of attachment until the handover completes. Therefore, a number of extensions to Mobile IPv6 have been proposed to reduce the handover latency and the number of lost packets. We focus on Fast Mobile IPv6 which is an extension of Mobile IPv6 that allows the use of L2 triggers to anticipate the handover. We compare the handover latency in four specific cases: basic Mobile IPv6, the forwarding method of Mobile IPv6, the Anticipated method, and the Tunnel-Based Handover. The results of the handover latency are calculated with the L2 properties of IEEE 802.11b. In particular, we take into account the L2 handover for different configurations of the wireless network. 相似文献
8.
This paper proposes a fast handover mechanism to provide a seamless multicast service for Mobile IPv6 hosts. With the proposed
Fast handover based on a Mobile IP-Multi casting (FMIP-M) protocol, the selection of a new multicast service method, service
preparation, and initialization procedures are all performed during the fast handover period, thereby enabling a reliable
and efficient multicast service. When mobile hosts move to other networks, they can encounter data loss, out-of-synch problems
for multicast data, and multicast service exchange latency. Therefore, the proposed FMIP-M allows the new access router to
select a suitable multicast service method according to the multicast service-related network conditions and supports a reliable
multicast transmission by compensating for data losses from the previous access router. An analysis is conducted of the overheads
associated with a fast multicast handover, including the signaling cost and multicast packet-forwarding cost, where the costs
are formulated based on timing diagrams, and compared with a fast handover using Mobile IPv6. The performance analysis and
numerical results confirm that the proposed FMIP-M provides a fast multicast handover and reliable service with a relatively
small signaling cost and packet-delivery cost. 相似文献
9.
Adnan J. Jabir S. Shamala Z. Zuriati N. A. W. A. Hamid 《Wireless Personal Communications》2014,74(2):499-517
Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) is a network based mobility protocol which has been designed to relieve the mobile nodes (MNs) from participating in the mobility process and to reduce the long handoff latency of the MIPv6 protocol. However, PMIPv6 incurs a long communication path due to the triangle routing problem, in which, all packets sent by MNs are obligated to pass through the local mobility anchor. Several solutions have been proposed to mitigate this issue. However, they still incur high signaling overhead to recover the Route Optimization (RO) status after handoff. In this paper, we propose a Cluster-Based RO (CBRO) scheme for the clustered architecture of the PMIPv6, in which, the Mobile Access Gateways (MAGs) are grouped into clusters with a distinguished Head MAG (HMAG) for each. In the proposed CBRO, the RO process is relied on the HMAGs to reduce the handoff latency while achieving a fast recovery of the optimized path after handoff. The proposed CBRO is evaluated analytically and compared with the basic PMIP and the current RO schemes. The obtained numerical results have shown that the proposed CBRO outperforms all other schemes in terms of signaling cost required to recover the RO status after handoff and the total cost performance metrics. 相似文献
10.
Kantubukta Vasu Sudipta Mahapatra Cheruvu Siva Kumar 《Wireless Personal Communications》2014,78(2):943-977
Seamless mobility in future generation networks, which are envisioned to be heterogeneous in nature, is an important issue. While Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) work groups have standardized various mobility management protocols, such as Mobile IPv6 and Proxy Mobile IPv6, a comprehensive study of these protocols in terms of various performance characteristics is a challenging issue. Moreover, this study also considers the recent proposals from IETF in distributed mobility management (DMM) protocols. In this paper, a novel analytical model is developed for comparison of various mobility management protocols in terms of handover latency, as well as packet density, and packet arrival rate during the handover time by applying transport engineering principles in the field of telecommunication. The signaling cost analysis using signaling overhead incurred during protocol operations is given for each of these protocols. The number of packets that can be lost during the handover operation is also obtained using this model. Moreover, it presents a unified framework using which one can assess the performance characteristics of both host based and network based mobile IP protocols. One can also assess the performance of centralized and DMM approaches. The correctness of the proposed model is established by the fact that it leads to results similar to those obtained by applying some of the existing models. At the same time, the model allows one to obtain additional results showing the effect of packet density and packet arrival rate on the handover latency. 相似文献
11.
12.
Mobile IP allows a mobile node to maintain a continuous connectivity to the Internet when moving from one access point to another. However, due to the link switching delay and to Mobile IP handover operations, packets designated to mobile nodes can be delayed or lost during the handover period. Moreover, every time a new attach point is confirmed, the mobile node, its home agent and its corresponding node must be authenticated mutually. This paper presents a new control function called Extended Handover Control Function (E‐HCF) in order to improve handover performance and authentication in the context of Mobile IPv6 over wireless networks. With an analytical model and some OPNET simulations, we show in this paper that our solution allows provision of low latency, low packet loss and mutual authentication to the standard handover of Mobile IPv6. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 相似文献
13.
研究了移动IPv6协议中的越区切换问题,提出了一种基于特征投影的移动IPv6快速切换方法。该方法通过构造先验切换经验与小区覆盖范围的映射关系来协助移动接入网关对切换目的地进行预测。仿真结果表明,文中方法能够获得比FPMIPv6更小的切换延迟,并具有较好的鲁棒性。 相似文献
14.
Ibrahim Al-Surmi Mohamed Othman Nor Asila Wati Abdul Hamid Borhanuddin Mohd Ali 《Wireless Networks》2013,19(6):1317-1336
As a network-based localized mobility management protocol, Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) enables a Mobile Host (MH) to roam within a localized domain without MH intervention in the mobility-related signalling. However, the PMIPv6 maintains MH mobility support in a restriction domain. Therefore, whenever the MH roams away from the PMIPv6 domain, its reachability status will be broken-down causing high handover latency and inevitable traffic loss for its communication session. This article proposes a proactive mechanism to mange the MH handover and maintain its data session continually across inter-PMIPv6-domains. The proposed mechanism introduces an intermediate global mobility anchor entity, called, which is responsible to coordinate MH handover as well as redirect its traffic across inter-PMIPv6-domains. Through various simulation evaluations, via ns-2, several experiments were conducted, revealing numerous results that verify the proposed mechanism superior performance over the conventional inter-PMIPv6-domain handover schemes in terms of handover latency, achieved throughput, protocol signalling cost and end-to-end traffic delivery latency. 相似文献
15.
The handover processes in present IP mobility management protocols incur significant latency, thus aggravating QoS of consumer devices. In this paper, we introduce an enhanced handover process for the Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) protocol, which is a recently developed IP mobility management protocol aiming at providing network-based mobility support. The proposed handover process further improves handover performance of PMIPv6 by allowing a new access network obtains handover context before a consumer??s mobile node (MN) moves to the new access network. Data packets destined for the MN are buffered to prevent packet loss and immediately delivered to the MN as the MN moves to the new access network. We evaluate the handover latency and data packet loss of the proposed handover process compared to the basic one of PMIPv6. The conducted analysis results confirm that the proposed handover process yields the reduced handover latency compared to that of the basic PMIPv6 and also prevents data packet loss. We moreover evaluate the buffering cost of the proposed handover process. 相似文献
16.
17.
Handover management for mobile nodes in IPv6 networks 总被引:16,自引:0,他引:16
We analyze IPv6 handover over wireless LAN. Mobile IPv6 is designed to manage mobile nodes' movements between wireless IPv6 networks. Nevertheless, the active communications of a mobile node are interrupted until the handover completes. Therefore, several extensions to Mobile IPv6 have been proposed to reduce the handover latency and the number of lost packets. We describe two of them, hierarchical Mobile IPv6, which manages local movements into a domain, and fast handover protocol, which allows the use of layer 2 triggers to anticipate the handover. We expose the specific handover algorithms proposed by all these methods. We also evaluate the handover latency over IEEE 802.11b wireless LAN. We compare the layer 2 and layer 3 handover latency in the Mobile IPv6 case in order to show the saving of time expected by using anticipation. We conclude by showing how to adapt the IEEE 802.11b control frames to set up such anticipation. 相似文献
18.
A comparative performance analysis on Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 and Proxy Mobile IPv6 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
Jong-Hyouk Lee Youn-Hee Han Sri Gundavelli Tai-Myoung Chung 《Telecommunication Systems》2009,41(4):279-292
This paper presents comparative results on Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 and Proxy Mobile IPv6. The two mobility support protocols
have similar hierarchical mobility management architectures but there are, however, clearly different perceptions: Hierarchical
Mobile IPv6 has specific properties of a host-based mobility support protocol, whereas Proxy Mobile IPv6 is based on a network-based
mobility support protocol. Thus, it is important to reveal their mobility characteristics and performance impact factors.
In this paper, a cost based evaluation model is developed that evaluates the location update cost, the packet delivery cost,
and the wireless power consumption cost based on the protocol operations used. Then, the numerical results are presented in
where impacts of the various system parameters are evaluated. The results demonstrate that Proxy Mobile IPv6 always outperforms
Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 due to its ability to avoid the mobility signaling sent by the mobile host, and its reduced tunneling
overhead during communications with other nodes. 相似文献
19.
Mobile IP (MIP) requires mobile nodes (MNs) to register with the home agents (HAs) whenever the MNs change their point of attachment (PoA: access point (AP) or base station (BS)) in different subnets. Thus, such registrations cause excessive signaling overhead and long service delay. To solve this problem, proxy mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) has been proposed by the IETF NETLMM working group. In PMIPv6, a new entity called mobile access gateway (MAG) performs the mobility‐related signaling with the local mobility anchor (LMA) on behalf of the MN and establishes a tunnel with the LMA. However, a number of MNs must be associated with an MAG, which means that the MAG can be easily overloaded. Therefore, in this paper, we propose a load balancing mechanism among the MAGs in the PMIPv6 network. The PMIPv6 handover signaling procedure is extended to support the proposed load balancing mechanism. We also discuss using IEEE 802.21 Media Independent Handover (MIH) protocol for load balancing to determine the load status at the candidate PoAs, in addition to the load status at the candidate MAGs. To evaluate the performance, we analyze the average waiting time in the queue at the MAG. Through simulations and numerical analysis, we show that the proposed load balancing mechanism can produce less queueing delay at the MAG and a higher data transmission rate at the PoA than when a load balancing operation is not performed in the PMIPv6 network. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 相似文献
20.
Shaojian Fu Mohammed Atiquzzaman Liran Ma Yong‐Jin Lee 《Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing》2005,5(7):825-845
Mobile IP has been developed to handle mobility of Internet hosts at the network layer. Mobile IP (MIP), however, suffers from a number of drawbacks such as requirement of infrastructure change, high handover latency, high packet loss rate, and conflict with network security solutions. In this paper, we describe and evaluate the performance of SIGMA, a Seamless IP diversity‐based Generalized Mobility Architecture. SIGMA utilizes multihoming to achieve seamless handover of mobile hosts, and is designed to solve many of the drawbacks of MIP, including requirement for changes in infrastructure. We first evaluate the signaling cost of SIGMA and compare with that of hierarchical Mobile IPv6 (an enhancement of Mobile IP) by analytical modeling, followed by comparison of handover performance of SIGMA and Mobile IPv6 enhancements. Criteria for performance evaluation include handover latency, packet loss, throughput, and network friendliness. Our results indicate that in most cases SIGMA has a lower signaling cost than Hierarchical Mobile IPv6. Moreover, for a typical network configuration, SIGMA has a higher handover performance over Mobile IP. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 相似文献