Determination of regions in the dihydrofolate reductase structure that interact with the molecular chaperonin GroEL

Dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) from Escherichia coli does not interact with the molecular chaperonin GroEL regardless of whether the interaction is initiated from the native or the unfolded state. In contrast, murine DHFR shows a strong interaction with GroEL. Using the structure of human DHFR as a model for the murine protein, a superimposition of the two structures shows that there are three distinct external loops in the eukaryotic DHFR that are not present in the E. coli protein. Removal of one loop (residues 99-108) from the eukaryotic murine DHFR has no effect on the interaction with GroEL. On the basis of the differences in structures, we inserted either of two surface loops of murine DHFR into the corresponding regions of E. coli DHFR. In the first mutant (EcDHFR-i(9)36), residues 36 and 37 (L-N) of E. coli DHFR were replaced with the nine amino acid sequence T-T-S-S-V-E-G-K-Q. In the second mutant (EcDHFR-i(7)136), residues 136-139 (V-F-S-E) of E. coli DHFR were replaced with the seven amino acid sequence L-P-E-Y-P-G-V. Both E. coli DHFR mutants formed a complex with GroEL starting from either the native or the unfolded states of DHFR. The binding was specific since the presence of MgATP caused the release of the proteins from GroEL. As with murine DHFR, nonnative conformations of EcDHFR-i(9)36 and EcDHFR-i(7)136 are bound to GroEL. Fluorescence titration techniques were used to quantitate the interaction between GroEL and these proteins. A simple chromatographic procedure was developed to remove contaminating tryptophan containing peptides from GroEL samples. The mutant EcDHFR-i(7)136 binds to GroEL with a stoichiometry of 4-5 mol of DHFR per mol of GroEL tetradecamer, while murine DHFR binds to GroEL with a stoichiometry of 2 mol of DHFR per mol of GroEL tetradecamer. Both murine DHFR and EcDHFR-i(7)136 bind to GroEL very tightly, with equilibrium dissociation constants of less than 85 nM.     

Protein folding: how the mechanism of GroEL action is defined by kinetics

We propose a mechanism for the role of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL in folding proteins. The principal assumptions of the mechanism are (i) that many unfolded proteins bind to GroEL because GroEL preferentially binds small unstructured regions of the substrate protein, (ii) that substrate protein within the cavity of GroEL folds by the same kinetic mechanism and rate processes as in bulk solution, (iii) that stable or transient complexes with GroEL during the folding process are defined by a kinetic partitioning between formation and dissociation of the complex and the rate of folding and unfolding of the protein, and (iv) that dissociation from the complex in early stages of folding may lead to aggregation but dissociation at a late stage leads to correct folding. The experimental conditions for refolding may play a role in defining the function of GroEL in the folding pathway. We propose that the role of GroES and MgATP, either binding or hydrolysis, is to regulate the association and dissociation processes rather than affecting the rate of folding.     

The chaperonin GroEL binds to late-folding non-native conformations present in native Escherichia coli and murine dihydrofolate reductases

We have examined the equilibrium and kinetic folding properties of two structurally homologous dihydrofolate reductases, Escherichia coli DHFR (EcDHFR) and murine DHFR (MuDHFR), as a function of temperature and ligand concentration. Conformational heterogeneity in native DHFR is well documented, and the results demonstrate that the non-native form(s) represents late intermediate(s) in the folding process. We have measured the concentrations of native and non-native forms and the rate constants for their interconversion over a temperature range of 3 degreesC to 49 degreesC, allowing characterization of the thermodynamic as well as the kinetic properties of the final folding step(s) relative to the overall folding reaction. Differences in ligand binding suggest that the intermediate structures for these two proteins may be different during refolding.     

Native-like structure of a protein-folding intermediate bound to the chaperonin GroEL

The chaperonin GroEL binds nonnative proteins in its central channel through hydrophobic interactions and initiates productive folding in this space underneath bound co-chaperone, GroES, in the presence of ATP. The questions of where along the folding pathway a protein is recognized by GroEL, and how much structure is present in a bound substrate have remained subjects of discussion, with some experiments suggesting that bound forms are fully unfolded and others suggesting that bound species are partially structured. Here we have studied a substrate protein, human dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR), observing in stopped-flow fluorescence experiments that it can rapidly bind to GroEL at various stages of folding. We have also analyzed the structure of the GroEL-bound protein using hydrogen-deuterium exchange and NMR spectroscopy. The pattern and magnitude of amide proton protection indicate that the central parallel beta-sheet found in native DHFR is present in a moderately stable state in GroEL-bound DHFR. Considering that the strands are derived from distant parts of the primary structure, this suggests that a native-like global topology is also present. We conclude that significant native-like structure is present in protein-folding intermediates bound to GroEL.     

Asymmetrical interaction of GroEL and GroES in the ATPase cycle of assisted protein folding

The chaperonins GroEL and GroES of Escherichia coli facilitate protein folding in an adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-dependent reaction cycle. The kinetic parameters for the formation and dissociation of GroEL-GroES complexes were analyzed by surface plasmon resonance. Association of GroES and subsequent ATP hydrolysis in the interacting GroEL toroid resulted in the formation of a stable GroEL:ADP:GroES complex. The complex dissociated as a result of ATP hydrolysis in the opposite GroEL toroid, without formation of a symmetrical GroEL:(GroES)2 intermediate. Dissociation was accelerated by the addition of unfolded polypeptide. Thus, the functional chaperonin unit is an asymmetrical GroEL:GroES complex, and substrate protein plays an active role in modulating the chaperonin reaction cycle.     

Conformational states bound by the molecular chaperones GroEL and secB: a hidden unfolding (annealing) activity

We have analysed the conformational states of barnase that are bound by the molecular chaperones GroEL and SecB. Line broadening in the NMR spectra of barnase in the presence of chaperone indicates binding of the native state of barnase to both GroEL and SecB, with a dissociation constant of > 3 x 10(-4) M for the GroEL-native barnase complex. GroEL and SecB catalyse the hydrogen-deuterium exchange of amide proteins of barnase that require global unfolding for exchange to occur, indicating that both chaperones bind to a fully unfolded state of barnase. Binding of the denatured state was also detected by a reversible lowering of the melting temperature of barnase in the presence of chaperone. The dissociation constant of the complex between denatured barnase and either chaperone is 5 x 10(-8) M. The chaperone-bound fully unfolded state is a minor conformation that would not be seen by direct observation under physiological conditions, as the folding intermediate of barnase is the most populated state in the complex. The rate-limiting step for exchange of buried amide protons of bound barnase is the unfolding of the folding intermediate, which is retarded > 2000-fold in the complex with GroEL. The reverse refolding step is retarded > 1000-fold by GroEL leading to an EX1 mechanism for exchange. In contrast, unfolding of native barnase is catalysed by > 1000-fold. Thus, molecular chaperones GroEL and SecB have the potential to act in vivo and in vitro as: (1) a folding/transport-scaffold to prevent aggregation of partially folded states by binding; (2) as an annealing-machine to generate continuous unfolding of misfolded states until a low-affinity state is formed; and (3) as an unfoldase to catalyse unfolding of the misfolded states.     

The chaperonin cycle cannot substitute for prolyl isomerase activity, but GroEL alone promotes productive folding of a cyclophilin-sensitive substrate to a cyclophilin-resistant form

The chaperonin GroEL and the peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase cyclophilin are major representatives of two distinct cellular systems that help proteins to adopt their native three-dimensional structure: molecular chaperones and folding catalysts. Little is known about whether and how these proteins cooperate in protein folding. In this study, we have examined the action of GroEL and cyclophilin on a substrate protein in two distinct prolyl isomerization states. Our results indicate that: (i) GroEL binds the same substrate in different prolyl isomerization states. (ii) GroEL-ES does not promote prolyl isomerizations, but even retards isomerizations. (iii) Cyclophilin cannot promote the correct isomerization of prolyl bonds of a GroEL-bound substrate, but acts sequentially after release of the substrate from GroEL. (iv) A denatured substrate with all-native prolyl bonds is delayed in folding by cyclophilin due to isomerization to non-native prolyl bonds; a substrate that has proceeded in folding beyond a stage where it can be bound by GroEL is still sensitive to cyclophilin. (v) If a denatured cyclophilin-sensitive substrate is first bound to GroEL, however, productive folding to a cyclophilin-resistant form can be promoted, even without GroES. We conclude that GroEL and cyclophilin act sequentially and exert complementary functions in protein folding.     

Preventing mouth injuries during sports

In the presence of MgATP or MgADP the E. coli chaperonin proteins, GroEL and GroES, form a stable asymmetric complex with a stoichiometry of two GroEL7:one GroES7: seven MgADP. The distribution of the ligands between the two heptameric GroEL rings is crucial to our understanding of the mechanism of chaperonin-assisted folding, being either cis (i.e. [GroEL7.MgADP7.GroES7]-[GroEL7]) or trans (i.e. [GroEL7.MgADP7]-[GroEL7.GroES7]. On the basis of cross-linking experiments with 8-azido-ATP and the heterobifunctional reagent, N-succinimidyl 3-(2-pyridyldithio) propionate (SPDP), it was suggested that GroES and MgADP are bound to the same GroEL ring which resists proteinase K digestion [Nature 366 (1993) 228-233]. However, we find that the SPDP-promoted cross linking of GroES and GroEL occurs in the absence of Mg2+, ADP or ATP, which are required for the formation of the asymmetric complex. Cross-linking is shown to occur only when the SPDP-modified GroES is co-precipitated with GroEL by trichloracetic acid. Furthermore, there are structural grounds for questioning whether SPDP can crosslink, in a physiologically relevant manner, an amino group of GroES with any of the cysteinyl groups of GroEL.     

Significant hydrogen exchange protection in GroEL-bound DHFR is maintained during iterative rounds of substrate cycling

An unresolved key issue in the mechanism of protein folding assisted by the molecular chaperone GroEL is the nature of the substrate protein bound to the chaperonin at different stages of its reaction cycle. Here we describe the conformational properties of human dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) bound to GroEL at different stages of its ATP-driven folding reaction, determined by hydrogen exchange labeling and electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Considerable protection involving about 20 hydrogens is observed in DHFR bound to GroEL in the absence of ATP. Analysis of the line width of peaks in the mass spectra, together with fluorescence quenching and ANS binding studies, suggest that the bound DHFR is partially folded, but contains stable structure in a small region of the polypeptide chain. DHFR rebound to GroEL 3 min after initiating its folding by the addition of MgATP was also examined by hydrogen exchange, fluorescence quenching, and ANS binding. The results indicate that the extent of protection of the substrate protein rebound to GroEL is indistinguishable from that of the initial bound state. Despite this, small differences in the quenching coefficient and ANS binding properties are observed in the rebound state. On the basis of these results, we suggest that GroEL-assisted folding of DHFR occurs by minor structural adjustments to the partially folded substrate protein during iterative cycling, rather than by complete unfolding of this protein substrate on the chaperonin surface.     

Differential expression of calbindin and calmodulin in motoneurons after hypoglossal axotomy

Interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) is a structurally labile cytokine that rapidly denatures upon exposure to acid or heat. Here we show that both acid-denatured (pH 2) and thermally inactivated (50 degrees C) porcine IFN-gamma can be rescued with the Escherichia coli GroEL/ES chaperonin system and ATP, and reassembled into bioactive dimers. At 35 degrees C, spontaneous refolding of acid-denatured IFN-gamma was found to be dependent on the presence of guanidinium hydrochloride (0.15-0.25 M) or NaCl (0.1-0.2 M). Under non-permissive reaction conditions for regain of native structure (low-ionic-strength buffer at 35 degrees C), the yield of IFN-gamma refolded with GroEL/ES/ATP increased about 30-fold above the level of spontaneous refolding. In the absence of GroES, GroEL captured IFN-gamma in a folding-competent complex. Under these conditions, both ATP and alpha-casein induced release of IFN-gamma from GroEL but with the released protein tending to partition into sedimentable aggregates. Only in the presence of GroES, did ATP induce complete discharge of IFN-gamma from GroEL, with the released protein refolded into a conformation that is (a) immunoreactive/bio-active, (b) resistant to precipitation and (c) in a dimeric configuration. Chicken egg albumin and 90-kDa heat-shock protein were inactive in the exertion of any protective effect against physicochemical stress. The precise amount of protein refolded to the native state at different times of the folding reaction was determined by alpha-casein quenching and ELISA. The former is based on the conversion by excess alpha-casein of any population of unfolded IFN-gamma into one that escapes antibody recognition by subsequent ELISA. Since the native dimers, however, are not affected by alpha-casein quenching, immunoreactivity is directly proportional to the yield of correctly refolded protein. The validity of this approach was confirmed by measurement of biological activity. GroEL/ES-meditated reactivation amounted to > 80% both by ELISA and antiviral assay.     

The ATP hydrolysis-dependent reaction cycle of the Escherichia coli Hsp70 system DnaK, DnaJ, and GrpE

Molecular chaperones of the Hsp70 class bind unfolded polypeptide chains and are thought to be involved in the cellular folding pathway of many proteins. DnaK, the Hsp70 protein of Escherichia coli, is regulated by the chaperone protein DnaJ and the cofactor GrpE. To gain a biologically relevant understanding of the mechanism of Hsp70 action, we have analyzed a model reaction in which DnaK, DnaJ, and GrpE mediate the folding of denatured firefly luciferase. The binding and release of substrate protein for folding involves the following ATP hydrolysis-dependent cycle: (i) unfolded luciferase binds initially to DnaJ; (ii) upon interaction with luciferase-DnaJ, DnaK hydrolyzes its bound ATP, resulting in the formation of a stable luciferase-DnaK-DnaJ complex; (iii) GrpE releases ADP from DnaK; and (iv) ATP binding to DnaK triggers the release of substrate protein, thus completing the reaction cycle. A single cycle of binding and release leads to folding of only a fraction of luciferase molecules. Several rounds of ATP-dependent interaction with DnaK and DnaJ are required for fully efficient folding.     

The 77-kDa echinoderm microtubule-associated protein (EMAP) shares epitopes with the mammalian brain MAPs, MAP-2 and tau

Heat shock proteins not only can protect host cells against heat stress, they can also enable freeze tolerance as well. With respect to this unexpected feature, we are able to show that, at least in Escherichia coli, the heat shock proteins DnaK/DnaJ and GroEL play a very significant role. We found that the recovery rate of E. coli cultures that had been stored at -80 degreesC in the absence of any cryoprotectant was related to the abundance of these heat shock proteins accumulated before the freeze treatment. Before freezing, the DnaK in the bacterial cells was induced to accumulate to a level comparable to that produced in response to heat shock. After the freezing treatment, the recovery rate of the induced culture was very similar to that of the heat-shocked culture. Over production of GroEL was also protective but less effective. While freezing inevitably leads to protein denaturation, we propose that advance synthesis of DnaK/DnaJ and GroEL can accordingly prevent irreversible denaturation by chaperoning the unfolded polypeptides during freezing.     

Partitioning of rhodanese onto GroEL. Chaperonin binds a reversibly oxidized form derived from the native protein

The mammalian mitochondrial enzyme, rhodanese, can form stable complexes with the Escherichia coli chaperonin GroEL if it is either refolded from 8 M urea in the presence of chaperonin or is simply added to the chaperonin as the folded conformer at 37 degreesC. In the presence of GroEL, the kinetic profile of the inactivation of native rhodanese followed a single exponential decay. Initially, the inactivation rates showed a dependence on the chaperonin concentration but reached a constant maximum value as the GroEL concentration increased. Over the same time period, in the absence of GroEL, native rhodanese showed only a small decline in activity. The addition of a non-denaturing concentration of urea accelerated the inactivation and partitioning of rhodanese onto GroEL. These results suggest that the GroEL chaperonin may facilitate protein unfolding indirectly by interacting with intermediates that exist in equilibrium with native rhodanese. The activity of GroEL-bound rhodanese can be completely recovered upon addition of GroES and ATP. The reactivation kinetics and commitment rates for GroEL-rhodanese complexes prepared from either unfolded or native rhodanese were identical. However, when rhodanese was allowed to inactivate spontaneously in the absence of GroEL, no recovery of activity was observed upon addition of GroEL, GroES, and ATP. Interestingly, the partitioning of rhodanese and its subsequent inactivation did not occur when native rhodanese and GroEL were incubated under anaerobic conditions. Thus, our results strongly suggest that the inactive intermediate that partitions onto GroEL is the reversibly oxidized form of rhodanese.     

GroEL-mediated protein folding proceeds by multiple rounds of binding and release of nonnative forms

The chaperonin GroEL is a ribosome-sized double-ring structure that assists in folding a diverse set of polypeptides. We have examined the fate of a polypeptide during a chaperonin-mediated folding reaction. Strikingly, we find that, upon addition of ATP and the cochaperonin GroES, polypeptide is released rapidly from GroEL in a predominantly nonnative conformation that can be trapped by mutant forms of GroEL that are capable of binding but not releasing substrate. Released polypeptide undergoes kinetic partitioning: a fraction completes folding while the remainder is rebound rapidly by other GroEL molecules. Folding appears to occur in an all-or-none manner, as proteolysis and tryptophan fluorescence indicate that after rebinding, polypeptide has the same structure as in the original complex. These observations suggest that GroEL functions by carrying out multiple rounds of binding aggregation-prone or kinetically trapped intermediates, maintaining them in an unfolded state, and releasing them to attempt to fold in solution.     

In vivo observation of polypeptide flux through the bacterial chaperonin system

The quantitative contribution of chaperonin GroEL to protein folding in E. coli was analyzed. A diverse set of newly synthesized polypeptides, predominantly between 10-55 kDa, interacts with GroEL, accounting for 10%-15% of all cytoplasmic protein under normal growth conditions, and for 30% or more upon exposure to heat stress. Most proteins leave GroEL rapidly within 10-30 s. We distinguish three classes of substrate proteins: (I) proteins with a chaperonin-independent folding pathway; (II) proteins, more than 50% of total, with an intermediate chaperonin dependence for which normally only a small fraction transits GroEL; and (III) a set of highly chaperonin-dependent proteins, many of which dissociate slowly from GroEL and probably require sequestration of aggregation-sensitive intermediates within the GroEL cavity for successful folding.     

Single-tryptophan mutants of monomeric tryptophan repressor: optical spectroscopy reveals nonnative structure in a model for an early folding intermediate

A monomeric version of the dimeric tryptophan repressor from Escherichia coli, L39E TR, has previously been shown to resemble a transient intermediate that appears in the first few milliseconds of folding [Shao, X., Hensley, P., and Matthews, C. R. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 9941-9949]. In the present study, the optical properties of the two intrinsic tryptophans were used to compare the structure and dynamics of the monomeric form with those of the native, dimeric form. The urea-induced unfolding equilibria of Trp19/L39E TR (Trp99 replaced with Phe) and Trp99/L39E TR (Trp19 replaced with Phe) mutants were monitored by circular dichroism and fluorescence spectroscopies at pH 7.6 and 25 degrees C. Coincident normalized transitions show that the urea denaturation process for each single-tryptophan mutant follows a two-state model involving monomeric native and unfolded forms. The free energies at standard state in the absence of denaturant for Trp19/L39E TR and Trp99/L39E TR are less than that for L39E TR, indicating that both tryptophans are involved in stabilizing the monomer. Fluorescence and near-UV circular dichroism spectroscopies indicate that the tryptophan side chains in monomeric Trp19/L39E TR and Trp99/L39E TR occupy hydrophobic, well-structured environments that are distinctively different from those found in their dimeric counterparts. Acrylamide quenching experiments show that both Trp19 and Trp99 are partially exposed to solvent in the native state, with Trp99 having a slightly greater degree of exposure. Measurements of the steady-state anisotropies of Trp19/L39E and Trp99/L39E TR demonstrate that the motions of both tryptophan side chains are restricted in the folded conformation. On the basis of these data, it can be concluded that this monomeric form of the tryptophan repressor adopts a well-folded, stable conformation with nonnative tertiary structure. When combined with previous results, the current findings demonstrate that the development of higher order structure during the folding of this intertwined dimer does not follow a simple hierarchical model.     

Chaperone protein GrpE and the GroEL/GroES complex promote the correct folding of tobacco mosaic virus coat protein for ribonucleocapsid assembly in vivo

Several prokaryotic chaperone proteins were shown to promote the correct folding and in vivo assembly of tobacco mosaic virus coat protein (TMV CP) using a chimaeric RNA packaging system in control or chaperone-deficient mutant strains of Escherichia coli. Mutations in groEL or dnaK reduced the amount of both total and soluble TMV CP, and the yield of assembled TMV-like particles, several-fold. Thus both GroEL and DnaK have significant direct or indirect effects on the overall expression, stability, folding and assembly of TMV CP in vivo. In contrast, while cells carrying a mutation in grpE expressed TMV CP to a higher overall level than control E. coli, the amounts of both soluble CP and assembled TMV-like particles were below control levels, suggesting a negative effect of GrpE on overall CP accumulation, but positive role(s) in CP folding and assembly. Curiously, cells with mutations in groES and, to a lesser extent, dnaJ expressed total, soluble and assembled forms of TMV CP significantly above control values, suggesting some form of negative control by these chaperone proteins. To avoid pleiotropic effects or artefacts in chaperone-null mutants, selected chaperone proteins were also over-expressed in control E. coli cells. Overproduction of GroEL or GroES alone had little effect. However, co-overexpression of GroEL and GroES resulted in a two-fold increase in soluble TMV CP and a four-fold rise in assembled TMV-like (pseudovirus) particles in vivo. Moreover, TMV CP was shown to interact directly with GroEL in vivo. Together, these results suggest that GrpE and the GroEL/GroES chaperone complex promote the correct folding and assembly of TMV CP into ribonucleocapsids in vivo.     

SCL 90-R interpretation and brain tumour: a correction factor?

Two models are being considered for the mechanism of chaperonin-assisted protein folding in E. coli: (i) GroEL/GroES act primarily by enclosing substrate polypeptide in a folding cage in which aggregation is prevented during folding. (ii) GroEL mediates the repetitive unfolding of misfolded polypeptides, returning them onto a productive folding track. Both models are not mutually exclusive, but studies with the polypeptide-binding domain of GroEL have suggested that unfolding is the primary mechanism, enclosure being unnecessary. Here we investigate the capacity of the isolated apical polypeptide-binding domain to functionally replace the complete GroEL/GroES system. We show that the apical domain binds aggregation-sensitive polypeptides but cannot significantly assist their refolding in vitro and fails to replace the groEL gene or to complement defects of groEL mutants in vivo. A single-ring version of GroEL cannot substitute for GroEL. These results strongly support the view that sequestration of aggregation-prone intermediates in a folding cage is an important element of the chaperonin mechanism.     

GroEL and GroES control of substrate flux in the in vivo folding pathway of phage P22 coat protein

Our present understanding of the action of the chaperonins GroEL/S on protein folding is based primarily on in vitro studies, whereas the folding of proteins in the cellular milieu has not been as thoroughly investigated. We have developed a means of examining in vivo protein folding and assembly that utilizes the coat protein of bacteriophage P22, a naturally occurring substrate of GroEL/S. Here we show that amino acid substitutions in coat protein that cause a temperature-sensitive-folding (tsf) phenotype slowed assembly rates upon increasing the temperature of cell growth. Raising cellular concentrations of GroEL/S increased the rate of assembly of the tsf mutant coat proteins to nearly that of wild-type (WT) coat protein by protecting a thermolabile folding intermediate from aggregation, thereby increasing the concentration of assembly-competent coat protein. The rate of release of the tsf coat proteins from the GroEL/S-coat protein ternary complex was approximately 2-fold slower at non-permissive temperatures when compared with the release of WT coat protein. However, the rate of release of WT or tsf coat proteins at each temperature remained constant regardless of GroEL/S levels. Thus, raising the cellular concentration of GroEL/S increased the amount of assembly-competent tsf coat proteins not by altering the rates of folding but by increasing the probability of GroEL/S-coat protein complex formation.     

Structure of alpha-lytic protease complexed with its pro region

While the majority of proteins fold rapidly and spontaneously to their native states, the extracellular bacterial protease alpha-lytic protease (alphaLP) has a t(1/2) for folding of approximately 2,000 years, corresponding to a folding barrier of 30 kcal mol(-1). AlphaLP is synthesized as a pro-enzyme where its pro region (Pro) acts as a foldase to stabilize the transition state for the folding reaction. Pro also functions as a potent folding catalyst when supplied as a separate polypeptide chain, accelerating the rate of alphaLP folding by a factor of 3 x 10(9). In the absence of Pro, alphaLP folds only partially to a stable molten globule-like intermediate state. Addition of Pro to this intermediate leads to rapid formation of native alphaLP. Here we report the crystal structures of Pro and of the non-covalent inhibitory complex between Pro and native alphaLP. The C-shaped Pro surrounds the C-terminal beta-barrel domain of the folded protease, forming a large complementary interface. Regions of extensive hydration in the interface explain how Pro binds tightly to the native state, yet even more tightly to the folding transition state. Based on structural and functional data we propose that a specific structural element in alphaLP is largely responsible for the folding barrier and suggest how Pro can overcome this barrier.