Evaluating vehicle painting plans in an automobile assembly plant using an integrated AHP‐PROMETHEE approach

The painting activity is one of the most complex and important activities in automobile manufacturing. The inherent complexity of the painting activity and the frequent need for repainting usually turn the painting process into a bottleneck in automobile assembly plants, which is reflected in higher operating costs and longer overall cycle times. One possible approach for optimizing the performance of the paint shop is to improve the efficiency of the color planning. This can be accomplished by evaluating the relative merits of a set of vehicle painting plans. Since this problem has a multicriteria nature, we resort to the multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) methodology to tackle it. A recent trend in the MCDA field is the development of hybrid approaches that are used to achieve operational synergies between different methods. Here we apply, for the first time, an integrated approach that combines the strengths of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and the Preference Ranking Organization METHod for Enrichment Evaluations (PROMETHEE), aided by Geometrical Analysis for Interactive Aid (GAIA), to the problem of assessing alternative vehicle painting plans. The management of the assembly plant found the results of value and is currently using them in order to schedule the painting activities such that an enhancement of the operational efficiency of the paint shop is obtained. This efficiency gain has allowed the management to bid for a new automobile model to be assembled at this specific plant.     

Weapon selection using the AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment

The weapon selection problem is a strategic issue and has a significant impact on the efficiency of defense systems. On the other hand, selecting the optimal weapon among many alternatives is a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problem. This paper develops an evaluation model based on the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and the technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS), to help the actors in defence industries for the selection of optimal weapon in a fuzzy environment where the vagueness and subjectivity are handled with linguistic values parameterized by triangular fuzzy numbers. The AHP is used to analyze the structure of the weapon selection problem and to determine weights of the criteria, and fuzzy TOPSIS method is used to obtain final ranking. A real world application is conducted to illustrate the utilization of the model for the weapon selection problem. The application could be interpreted as demonstrating the effectiveness and feasibility of the proposed model.     

Selecting the best statistical distribution with PROMETHEE and GAIA

Three methods have previously been presented in Computer and Industrial Engineering for the selection of a statistical distribution to describe a data-set: the weighted sum model, the weighted multiplication model and data envelopment analysis. These are based on distinctive preset of parameters and result in three different rankings. In these approaches there is no interaction with the decision-maker (DM). This leads to the question: which method should a DM choose? In this paper, we adopt another approach where the DM is the central actor. Based on the multi-criteria decision aid methods, PROMETHEE and GAIA, we will show that different preference parameters (given by the DM) lead to different rankings. Finally, a group decision can be reached using its extension: PROMETHEE GDSS.     

An integrated fuzzy multi criteria group decision making approach for ERP system selection

This paper aims to ease group decision-making by using an integration of fuzzy AHP (analytic hierarchy process) and fuzzy TOPSIS (technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution) and its application to software selection of an electronic firm. Firstly, priority values of criteria in software selection problem have been determined by using fuzzy extension of AHP method. Fuzzy extension of AHP is suggested in this paper because of little computation time and much simpler than other fuzzy AHP procedures. Then, the result of the fuzzy TOPSIS model can be employed to define the most appropriate alternative with regard to this firm's goals in uncertain environment. Fuzzy numbers are presented in all phases in order to overcome any vagueness in decision making process. The final decision depends on the degree of importance of each decision maker so that wrong degree of importance causes the mistaken result. The researchers generally determine the degrees of importance of each decision maker according to special characteristics of each decision maker as subjectivity. In order to overcome this subjectivity in this paper, the judgments of decision makers are degraded to unique decision by using an attribute based aggregation technique. There is no study about software selection using integrated fuzzy AHP-fuzzy TOPSIS approach with group decision-making based on an attribute based aggregation technique. The results of the proposed approach and the other approaches are compared. Results indicate that our methodology allows decreasing the uncertainty and the information loss in group decision making and thus, ensures a robust solution to the firm.     

Logistics tool selection with two-phase fuzzy multi criteria decision making: A case study for personal digital assistant selection

Efficient logistics and supply chain management are enabled through the use of efficient information technologies (IT). The mobile logistics tools represent the IT interface in the supply chain. This paper aims to aid decision makers to identify the most appropriate mobile logistics tools and to achieve this aim, several evaluation criteria are identified to evaluate logistics tools, and a fuzzy axiomatic design (FAD) based group decision-making method is adopted to perform the evaluation in two phases. In the first phase of pre-assessment, alternatives that cannot meet basic requirements and the defined threshold are eliminated. In the second phase of selection, the remaining alternatives are more meticulously evaluated. Criteria weights are determined using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and another fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) technique, namely fuzzy technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS), is applied in the second phase to compare the outcome of FAD. A case study is provided in order to demonstrate the potential of the proposed methodology. Personal digital assistants (PDAs) with integrated barcode scanner that are available in the Turkish market are evaluated.     

A hybrid approach for fuzzy multi-attribute decision making in machine tool selection with consideration of the interactions of attributes

Global economic competition has spurred the manufacturing sector to improve and invest in modern equipment to satisfy the needs of the market. In particular, machine tool selection is the most important problem; it plays a primary role in the improvement of productivity and flexibility in the manufacturing environment and involves the imprecise, vague and uncertain information. This paper presents the hybrid approach of the fuzzy ANP (Analytic Network Process) and COPRAS-G (COmplex PRoportional ASsessment of alternatives with Grey relations) for fuzzy multi-attribute decision-making in evaluating machine tools with consideration of the interactions of the attributes. The fuzzy ANP is used to handle the imprecise, vague and uncertain information from expert judgments and model the interaction, feedback relationships and interdependence among the attributes to determine the weights of the attributes. COPRAS-G is employed to present the preference ratio of the alternatives in interval values with respect to each attribute and calculate the weighted priorities of the machine alternatives. Alternatives are ranked in ascending order by priority. As a demonstration of the proposed model, a numerical example is implemented based on the collected data and the literature. The result is then compared with the rankings provided by other methods such as TOPSIS-G, SAW-G and GRA. Moreover, a sensitivity analysis is conducted to verify the robustness of the ranking. The result highlights that the hybrid approach of the fuzzy ANP and COPRAS-G is a highly flexible tool and reaches an effective decision in machine tool selection.     

An integrated model for closed-loop supply chain configuration and supplier selection: Multi-objective approach

Reverse logistics consists of all operations related to the reuse of products. External suppliers are one of the important members of reverse logistics and closed loop supply chain (CLSC) networks. However in CLSC network configuration models, suppliers are assessed based on purchasing cost and other factors such as on-time delivery are ignored. In this research, a general closed loop supply chain network is examined that includes manufacturer, disassembly, refurbishing, and disposal sites. Meanwhile, it is managed by the manufacturer. We propose an integrated model which has two phases. In the first phase, a framework for supplier selection criteria in RL is proposed. Besides, a fuzzy method is designed to evaluate suppliers based on qualitative criteria. The output of this stage is the weight of each supplier according to each part. In the second phase, we propose a multi objective mixed-integer linear programming model to determine which suppliers and refurbishing sites should be selected (strategic decisions), and find out the optimal number of parts and products in CLSC network (tactical decisions). The objective functions maximize profit and weights of suppliers, and one of them minimizes defect rates. To our knowledge, this model is the first effort to consider supplier selection, order allocation, and CLSC network configuration, simultaneously. The mathematical programming model is validated through numerical analysis.     

Automatic generation of assembly system configuration with equipment selection for automotive battery manufacturing

High power and high capacity lithium-ion batteries are being adopted for electrical and hybrid electrical vehicles (EV/HEV) applications. An automotive Li-ion battery pack usually has a hierarchical composition of components assembled in some repetitive patterns. Such a product assembly hierarchy may facilitate automatic configuration of assembly systems including assembly task grouping, sequence planning, and equipment selection. This paper utilizes such a hierarchical composition in generating system configurations with equipment selection for optimal assembly system design. A recursive algorithm is developed to generate feasible assembly sequences and the initial configurations including hybrid configurations. The generated configurations are embedded in an optimal assembly system design problem for simultaneous equipment selection and task assignment by minimizing equipment investment cost. The complexity of the computational algorithm is also discussed.     

Supplier selection in electronic marketplaces using satisficing and fuzzy AHP

Supplier selection is a critical and demanding task for companies that participate in electronic marketplaces to find suppliers and to execute electronically their transactions. This paper is aimed to suggest a fresh approach for decision support enabling effective supplier selection processes in electronic marketplaces. We introduce an evaluation method with two stages: initial screening of the suppliers through the enforcement of hard constraints on the selection criteria and final supplier evaluation through the application of a modified variant of the Fuzzy Preference Programming (FPP) method. The proposed method alleviates the information overload effect that is inherent in the environment of electronic marketplaces, facilitates an easier elicitation of user preferences through the reduction of necessary user input (i.e. pairwise comparisons) and reduces computational complexity, in terms of the number of linear programs to be solved, in comparison with the original FPP method. The FPP method is adopted and modified accordingly in order to tackle the issue of inconsistency/uncertainty of human preference models. Our approach is demonstrated with the example of a hypothetical metal manufacturing company that finds and selects suppliers in the environment of an electronic marketplace.     

基于AHP/动态规划的虚拟企业伙伴选择决策方法

伙伴选择作为虚拟企业组建过程中的重要环节，是目前研究的热点。层次分析法(AHP)是解决该问题的一种常见方法，可以较好地解决备选企业的综合评价问题，但该方法的应用只局限于选择单个伙伴企业的情况。本文引入动态规划的思想，将伙伴企业的选择从一个扩充到多个，成功解决了同一类型的多个伙伴企业问的任务分配问题，并给出了应用实例。     

An interval type-2 fuzzy PROMETHEE method using a likelihood-based outranking comparison approach

Based on the preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluations (PROMETHEE), the purpose of this paper is to develop a new multiple criteria decision-making method that uses the approach of likelihood-based outranking comparisons within the environment of interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Uncertain and imprecise assessment of information often occurs in multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA). The theory of interval type-2 fuzzy sets is useful and convenient for modeling impressions and quantifying the ambiguous nature of subjective judgments. Using the approach of likelihood-based outranking comparisons, this paper presents an interval type-2 fuzzy PROMETHEE method designed to address MCDA problems based on interval type-2 trapezoidal fuzzy (IT2TrF) numbers. This paper introduces the concepts of lower and upper likelihoods for acquiring the likelihood of an IT2TrF binary relationship and defines a likelihood-based outranking index to develop certain likelihood-based preference functions that correspond to several generalized criteria. The concept of comprehensive preference measures is proposed to determine IT2TrF exiting, entering, and net flows in the valued outranking relationships. In addition, this work establishes the concepts of a comprehensive outranking index, a comprehensive outranked index, and a comprehensive dominance index to induce partial and total preorders for the purpose of acquiring partial ranking and complete ranking, respectively, of the alternative actions. The feasibility and applicability of the proposed method are illustrated with two practical applications to the problem of landfill site selection and a car evaluation problem. Finally, a comparison with other relevant methods is conducted to validate the effectiveness of the proposed method.     

A comparison between Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS methods to supplier selection

Supplier selection has become a very critical activity to the performance of organizations and supply chains. Studies presented in the literature propose the use of the methods Fuzzy TOPSIS (Fuzzy Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) and Fuzzy AHP (Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process) to aid the supplier selection decision process. However, there are no comparative studies of these two methods when applied to the problem of supplier selection. Thus, this paper presents a comparative analysis of these two methods in the context of supplier selection decision making. The comparison was made based on the factors: adequacy to changes of alternatives or criteria; agility in the decision process; computational complexity; adequacy to support group decision making; the number of alternative suppliers and criteria; and modeling of uncertainty. As an illustrative example, both methods were applied to the selection of suppliers of a company in the automotive production chain. In addition, computational tests were performed considering several scenarios of supplier selection. The results have shown that both methods are suitable for the problem of supplier selection, particularly to supporting group decision making and modeling of uncertainty. However, the comparative analysis has shown that the Fuzzy TOPSIS method is better suited to the problem of supplier selection in regard to changes of alternatives and criteria, agility and number of criteria and alternative suppliers. Thus, this comparative study contributes to helping researchers and practitioners to choose more effective approaches for supplier selection. Suggestions of further work are also proposed so as to make these methods more adequate to the problem of supplier selection.     

Cloud-FuSeR: Fuzzy ontology and MCDM based cloud service selection

With the rapidly growing number of available Cloud services, to fulfill the need for ordinary users to select accurate services has become a significant challenge. However, as a Cloud service environment encompasses many uncertainties that may hinder users to make sound decisions, it is highly desirable to handle fuzzy information when choosing a suitable service in an uncertain environment. In this paper, we present a novel fuzzy decision-making framework that improves the existing Cloud service selection techniques. In particular, we build a fuzzy ontology to model uncertain relationships between objects in databases for service matching, and present a novel analytic hierarchy process approach to calculate the semantic similarity between concepts. We also present a multi-criteria decision-making technique to rank Cloud services. Furthermore, we conduct extensive experiments to evaluate the performance of the fuzzy ontology-based similarity matching. The experimental results show the efficiency of the proposed method.     

An effective coding approach for multiobjective integrated resource selection and operation sequences problem

In this paper, we consider an integrated Resource Selection and Operation Sequences (iRS/OS) problem in Intelligent Manufacturing System (IMS). Several kinds of objectives are taken into account, in which the makespan for orders should be minimized; workloads among machine tools should be balanced; the total transition times between machines in a local plant should also be minimized. To solve this multiobjective iRS/OS model, a new two vectors-based coding approach has been proposed to improve the efficiency by designing a chromosome containing two kinds of information, i.e., operation sequences and machine selection. Using such kind of chromosome, we adapt multistage operation-based Genetic Algorithm (moGA) to find the Pareto optimal solutions. Moreover a special technique called left-shift hillclimber has been used as one kind of local search to improve the efficiency of our algorithm. Finally, the experimental results of several iRS/OS problems indicate that our proposed approach can obtain best solutions. Further more comparing with previous approaches, moGA performs better for finding Pareto solutions. Received: May 2005/Accepted: December 2005     

基于层次分析法和二元语义的供应商评价研究

供应商评价是一个多指标群决策问题。针对语言评价信息的模糊性,提出了一种基于层次分析法和二元语义的评价方法。利用层次分析法确定供应商评价指标权重,采用近年来最新发展的二元语义和算子进行信息的集结,给出了供应商评价选择的计算步骤。最后,算例分析证明了该方法的简便性和有效性。     

Decision making for the selection of cloud vendor: An improved approach under group decision-making with integrated weights and objective/subjective attributes

Cloud computing technology has become increasingly popular and can deliver a host of benefits. However, there are various kinds of cloud providers in the market and firms need scientific decision tools to judge which cloud computing vendor should be chosen. Studies in how a firm should select an appropriate cloud vendor have just started. However, existing studies are mainly from the technology and cost perspective, and neglect other influence factors, such as competitive pressure and managerial skills, etc. Hence, this paper proposes a multi-attribute group decision-making (MAGDM) based scientific decision tool to help firms to judge which cloud computing vendor is more suitable for their need by considering more comprehensive influence factors. It is argued that objective attributes, i.e., cost, as well as subjective attributes, such as TOE factors (Technology, Organization, and Environment) should be considered for the decision making in cloud computing services, and presents a new subjective/objective integrated MAGDM approach for solving decision problems. The proposed approach integrates statistical variance (SV), improved techniques for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS), simple additive weighting (SAW), and Delphi–AHP to determine the integrated weights of the attributes and decision-makers (DMs). The method considers both the objective weights of the attributes and DMs, as well as the subjective preferences of the DMs and their identity differences, thereby making the decision results more accurate and theoretically reasonable. A numerical example is given to illustrate the practicability and usefulness of the approach and its suitability as a decision-making tool for a firm using of cloud computing services. This paper enriches the theory and methodology of the selection problem of cloud computing vendoring and MAGDM analysis.     

Vendor selection by integrated fuzzy MCDM techniques with independent and interdependent relationships

Vendor selection is an evaluation process that is based on many criteria that uses inaccurate or uncertain data. But while the criteria are often numerous and the relationships between higher-level criteria and lower-level sub-criteria are complex, most conventional decision models cannot help us clarify the interrelationships among the sub-criteria. Our proposed integrated fuzzy multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) method addresses this issue within the context of the vendor selection problem. First, we use triangular fuzzy numbers to express the subjective preferences of evaluators. Second, we use interpretive structural modeling (ISM) to map out the relationships among the sub-criteria. Third, we use the fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (AHP) method to compute the relative weights for each criterion, and we use non-additive fuzzy integral to obtain the fuzzy synthetic performance of each common criterion. Fourth, the best vendor is determined according to the overall aggregating score of each vendor using the fuzzy weights with fuzzy synthetic utilities. Fifth, we use an empirical example to show that our proposed method is preferred to the traditional method, especially when the sub-criteria are interdependent. Finally, our results provide valuable suggestions to vendors on how to improve each sub-criterion so that they can bridge the gap between actual and aspired performance values in the future.     

Evaluating the criteria for human resource for science and technology (HRST) based on an integrated fuzzy AHP and fuzzy DEMATEL approach

This study intends to use a combination of fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and fuzzy Decision-making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) method in human resource for science and technology (HRST). Specifically, this study first uses AHP to evaluate the weighting for each criterion and then use DEMATEL method to establish contextual relationships among those criteria. We find out Infrastructure might be more critical since it is a cause and will directly influence human resource for science and technology performance. For human resource for science and technology (HRST), improving Infrastructure might be a better choice for the long period of time. Moreover, Education, R&D Expenses and Immediate output are more important second-tier criteria than Value, Cooperation, Labor Market, Human Capital and Intermediate output. Therefore, the improvement should be started with Infrastructure, particularly on identification of the Education, R&D Expenses and Immediate output.     

SNA-based multi-criteria evaluation of multiple construction equipment: A case study of loaders selection

Selecting the proper construction equipment is a challenging task owing to a wide range of available types as well as a host of criteria to be considered during decision making. To deal with this, a heterogeneous group decision-making framework to evaluate multiple purchasing choices of construction equipment is proposed with two data forms, i.e., 2-dimension uncertain linguistic variables (2DULVs) and real numbers. Firstly, a novel way to derive weights of experts by social network analysis (SNA) is applied considering trust degrees among experts in a social trust network. Secondly, after evaluation index system is established, 2DULVs that include both the linguistic evaluations on alternatives and decision makers’ appraisals on the given evaluation results are applied to represent subjective fuzzy evaluation information, while real numbers are used to represent quantitative values. Thirdly, 2-dimension uncertain linguistic power generalized weighted aggregation (2DULPGWA) operator is applied to aggregate evaluation values among experts. Fourthly, analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and entropy method are utilized to derive combined weights of sub-criteria before the rank can be obtained by the evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS) method. Finally, a case study to evaluate multiple choices of loaders is proposed and a comparative analysis is conducted to prove the effectiveness of the proposed framework. This study provides a meaningful guidance for the optimal selection among various types of construction equipment.     

Decision making on the factory floor: An integrated approach to process planning and scheduling

Computers make accesible large amounts of information to the different levels of manufacturing organizations. However, this information can be of limited use if adequate decision making methodology is not applied. Very often, decisions made on the factory floor have a substantial impact on the performance of the entire manufacturing system. Process planning and scheduling are two activities that influence significantly these decisions. The common aspect of these activities is the assignment of various factory resources to the production tasks. The method presented in this paper seeks to use this commonality to integrate process planning and scheduling.