The effect of prostate volume, age, total prostate specific antigen level and acute inflammation on the percentage of free serum prostate specific antigen levels in men without clinically detectable prostate cancer

PURPOSE: We determine the influence of age, prostate volume, total serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) level and histological evidence of acute inflammation in biopsy specimens on the percent free serum PSA level in men without clinically detectable prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 70 men with total PSA levels of 2.6 to 9.9 ng./ml. who had undergone at least 3 sets of prostate biopsies that were negative for cancer as part of our PSA based prostate cancer screening program. Total and free PSA levels were measured using Hybritech immunoassays. Prostate volume and the presence of acute inflammation were determined from the most recent transrectal ultrasonography and prostate needle biopsy. RESULTS: Percent free PSA levels correlated significantly with age (r = 0.48, p = 0.0001) and prostate volume (r = 0.44, p = 0.0002) but not with total PSA (r = 0.04, p = 0.7). The mean percent free PSA did not differ for those with or without acute inflammation. Multivariate regression models demonstrated that age and prostate volume were significant predictors of percent free PSA. CONCLUSIONS: Among men without detectable prostate cancer and a total PSA level between 2.6 and 9.9 ng./ml. percent free serum PSA was higher in older men and in men with a larger prostate gland but was not influenced by total PSA level or the presence of acute inflammation in the prostatic biopsy specimen.     

Radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: the perineal approach increases the risk of surgically induced positive margins and capsular incisions

PURPOSE: We compare the incidence of positive surgical margins in patients who underwent perineal or retropubic radical prostatectomy for clinically localized (stage T1, T2) prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective, nonrandomized study we reexamined the specimens of 94 consecutive patients who underwent radical perineal (48) or retropubic (46) prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer (stage T1, T2) and with pathological stage pT2 (intracapsular), pT3A (established extracapsular extension without positive margins) or pT3B (extracapsular extension with positive margins) without lymph node involvement (N0). We assessed the presence or absence of extracapsular cancer with or without positive margins, incisions of the prostatic capsule exposing cancer (surgically induced positive margins) or benign glandular tissue. Patients were followed for 3 to 66 months (mean 25) using an ultrasensitive prostate specific antigen assay with a lower detection limit of less than 0.05 ng./ml. RESULTS: The overall incidence of positive margins in cancer tissue was 56% in the perineal and 61% in the retropubic group, and biochemical failure-free survival was 67% each. However, surgically induced positive margins in patients with organ confined disease were more frequent in the perineal than retropubic group (43 versus 29%, p < 0.05) and associated with a 37% risk of biochemical failure (prostate specific antigen greater than 0.1 ng./ml.) at mean followup. In addition, capsular incisions exposing benign tissue were more frequent in the perineal than retropubic group (90 versus 37%, p < 0.05) irrespective of pathological stage. CONCLUSIONS: Although overall positive margins and biochemical failure rates are similar or identical for the perineal and retropubic approaches for organ confined prostate cancer, the perineal approach is associated with a significantly higher risk of capsular incisions and surgically induced positive margins and, thus, a higher risk of biochemical failure.     

Pathological features and prognostic significance of prostate cancer in the apical section determined by whole mount histology

PURPOSE: We test the hypothesis that cancer in the apical section of the prostate is an important independent factor in predicting the progression of clinically localized prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed clinical data and whole mount histological step sections for 500 patients who had undergone radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer. RESULTS: Cancer was in the apex of the prostate in 175 patients (35%). These patients had a larger cancer and higher incidence of positive surgical margins, and were more likely to have a poorly differentiated cancer than the 325 patients without cancer in the apex. However, the presence of apical cancer was not a significant predictor of clinical or prostate specific antigen progression in either univariate or multivariate Cox proportional hazards models when analyzed for the entire group or only in patients with tumor confined to the prostate. CONCLUSIONS: Apical cancer in a radical prostatectomy specimen is simply a sign of a larger volume cancer and is not independently associated with an increased risk of clinical or prostate specific antigen progression.     

Free-to-total prostate specific antigen ratio as a single test for detection of significant stage T1c prostate cancer

PURPOSE: We investigated whether impalpable, invisible (stage T1c) but significant prostate cancer can be detected better by determining the free-to-total prostate specific antigen (PSA) ratio of equivocal PSA serum levels. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The specificity of free-to-total PSA ratio using research monoclonal enzyme immunoassays was compared to that of PSA greater than 4.0 ng./ml. in 117 consecutive patients with PSA 3 to 15 ng./ml. (Hybritech Tandem-R assay) due to untreated benign prostatic hypertrophy or prostate cancer. Of the patients 77% underwent adenectomy or radical prostatectomy with thorough pathological evaluation of surgical specimens. RESULTS: Benign prostatic hypertrophy had a greater median free-to-total PSA ratio than stages T1c and T2 or greater prostate cancer (0.16 versus 0.09 and 0.11 ng./ml., p = 0.0001 and p = 0.0268, respectively). In stage T1c prostate cancer, areas under receiver operating characteristic curves were 0.58 and 0.84 for PSA and free-to-toal PSA ratio, and free-to-total PSA ratio correlated with prostate volume (r = 0.49, p = 0.005) and Gleason score (r = -0.37, p = 0.036). Pathologically, 84% of stage T1c cancers were significant and comparable to stage T2 or greater cancers. CONCLUSIONS: Free-to-total PSA ratio enhances the efficacy of PSA measurement by improving specificity for detecting impalpable, invisible but significant stage T1c prostate cancer.     

Selective induction of a cationic amino acid transporter by tumor necrosis factor-alpha in vascular endothelium

Preoperative parameters were assessed for their usefulness in predicting tumor volume in 26 cases of nonpalpable prostate cancer. The number of positive biopsy cores was found to be the parameter which predicted most accurately tumor volume in surgical specimens. All 14 patients with multiple positive cores had an index tumor of 0.5 cm3 or more in radical prostatectomy specimens. Only six tumors with a single positive core were substantial. Three of the patients showed a serum level of prostate specific antigen (PSA) of 4.0 ng/ml or more. The pathological stage and prostatectomy Gleason sum could not be predicted accurately by this variable (P>0.05). To predict index tumor volumes of 1.0 cm3 or greater, stepwise logistic regression analysis was conducted, and on the basis of the results it was possible to single out multiple positive biopsies as the only significant variable. The number of positive biopsies appeared reliable for predicting tumor volume of surgical specimens in cases of nonpalpable disease. The presence of significant tumors despite "normal" levels of PSA warrants further investigation of variables that can predict such prostate cancers. An adequate model for predicting significant tumors in oriental male populations should be established using samples of larger size.     

Incidence, etiology, location, prevention and treatment of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer

PURPOSE: During radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer tumor at the surgical margin is a relatively frequent finding. We summarize the literature on the incidence, etiology, location, prevention and treatment of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The literature was reviewed for data on positive margins during radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. RESULTS: Positive surgical margins may result from artifacts induced by tissue processing, incising inadvertently into the prostate or incising into extraprostatic tumor that has extended beyond the limits of resection. Patients with 10 ng./ml. or greater preoperative prostate specific antigen, biopsy Gleason score 7, multiple positive biopsies, or clinical stage T2b, T2c or T3 cancer have a higher risk of positive margins. Preoperative endorectal magnetic resonance imaging may be useful in staging a select group of patients. Neoadjuvant androgen deprivation reduces the incidence of positive margins but does not appear to delay progression or improve survival. The surgical approach, retropubic or perineal, may influence the location and etiology of positive margins. In general, nerve and bladder neck sparing procedures do not compromise tumor removal in appropriately selected patients. Positive margins increase the risk of progression and correlate with decreased cancer specific and overall survival. There is no consensus on the management of positive margins. External beam radiation and androgen deprivation may be administered as adjuvant therapy or at the time of recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor at the specimen edge is an adverse prognostic factor. With appropriate patient selection and meticulous surgical technique some positive margins can be prevented. Controlled prospective randomized studies of postoperative therapy are needed before definitive recommendations can be made for treating positive margins.     

Prevalence and predictors of a positive repeat transrectal ultrasound guided needle biopsy of the prostate

PURPOSE: We determined the prevalence of and risk factors for carcinoma in patients with 1 previously negative prostate biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Transrectal ultrasound guided prostate needle biopsies were repeated in 130 men. Risk factors analyzed included age, pathological result of initial biopsy, inter-biopsy interval, prostate specific antigen (PSA), PSA density, PSA velocity, digital rectal examination, abnormal transrectal ultrasound and family history of prostate cancer. RESULTS: A total of 39 patients (30%) had positive biopsies for cancer. Univariate analysis revealed that PSA more than 20 ng./ml. and abnormal transrectal ultrasound were more frequent in men with positive second biopsies. Using multivariate logistic regression analysis only PSA more than 20 ng./ml. was a significant risk factor (adjusted odds ratio 4.48, 95% confidence interval 1.02 to 20.1). We determined the incidence of carcinoma in patients who represent the lowest risk group as defined by PSA less than 10 ng./ml., PSA density less than 0.15 mg./ml./cm.3, PSA velocity less than 0.75, ng./ml. per year, no prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia plus negative transrectal ultrasound, digital rectal examination and family history. Of 21 patients who fit this cohort 5 (23.8%) had carcinoma on repeat biopsy. CONCLUSIONS: A significant false-negative rate for initial transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsies exists. Baseline risk in lowest risk patients is sufficiently high such that one cannot define a subset of patients for whom repeat biopsy is unnecessary. We recommend repeat biopsy in all patients who meet the criteria for a transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy and in whom the initial biopsy is negative.     

Predictors of pathological stage before neoadjuvant androgen withdrawal therapy and radical prostatectomy. The Canadian Urologic Oncology Group

PURPOSE: This prospective randomized trial was used to compare predictive factors for organ confined margin negative status after radical prostatectomy with and without a 3-month course of neoadjuvant androgen withdrawal therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 213 patients with localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate were randomized to radical prostatectomy with or without a 3-month course of 300 mg. neoadjuvant cyproterone acetate daily. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine significant predictors of organ confined margin negative status after radical prostatectomy in both groups. Parameters evaluated included baseline prostate specific antigen (PSA 4 or less, 4.1 to 10, greater than 10 ng./ml.), clinical stage (T2c versus T2b or less), biopsy Gleason score and percentage of surface area of biopsies involved with cancer. The multivariate analysis was repeated with PSA density and the natural logarithm of PSA to optimize the model. RESULTS: In the radical prostatectomy alone arm a model incorporating only PSA density was the best predictor of organ confined margin negative status. In the neoadjuvant androgen withdrawal therapy arm a model incorporating biopsy Gleason score, PSA density and clinical stage was the best predictor. CONCLUSIONS: The conventional predictors of pathology at radical prostatectomy, biopsy Gleason score, PSA density and clinical stage retain significance as predictors in patients treated with a 3-month course of neoadjuvant androgen withdrawal therapy before radical prostatectomy.     

Outcome based staging for clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate

PURPOSE: Some patients with clinically localized prostate cancer are not cured after radical prostatectomy because of the presence of occult systemic disease. The American Joint Commission on Cancer staging classification for prostate cancer does not reliably distinguish between clinically localized patients who are likely or unlikely to be cured after local therapy. This project was undertaken to develop a staging system capable of predicting long-term outcome after radical prostatectomy on the basis of the clinical parameters obtained routinely during the standard workup for patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 688 clinically localized prostate cancer patients managed with a radical retropubic prostatectomy for adenocarcinoma of the prostate between 1989 and 1996 was evaluated for clinical features predictive of time to prostate specific antigen (PSA) failure using a Cox regression multivariate analysis. A recently defined clinical factor called the calculated prostate cancer volume and its ability to predict time to PSA failure in conjunction with PSA, biopsy Gleason score and clinical stage were evaluated. RESULTS: The calculated prostate cancer volume (p <0.0001) and the pretreatment PSA (p <0.001) provided the optimal staging system for predicting freedom from PSA failure after radical prostatectomy. CONCLUSIONS: The calculated prostate cancer volume and PSA may provide clinically useful information regarding outcome after radical prostatectomy, enabling the selection of a therapeutic approach for an individual patient with clinically localized disease. Validation of this staging system is needed.     

The contemporary value of pretreatment prostatic acid phosphatase to predict pathological stage and recurrence in radical prostatectomy cases

PURPOSE: We examine the clinical prognostic value of the currently available simple and inexpensive immunoenzymatic prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP) assay for the staging and prognosis of radical prostatectomy cases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between February 1, 1990 and May 3, 1996 pretreatment PAP was measured in 295 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy. From February 1, 1990 to May 17, 1992 the Hybritech Tandem-E assay was used in 75 cases, from May 18, 1992 to February 28, 1993 the Abbott EIA assay was used in 49 and from March 1, 1993 to May 3, 1996 the Abbott IMx assay was used in 171. PAP assays were analyzed individually and the results were combined with pretreatment prostate specific antigen (PSA) values to assess the ability to predict organ confined prostate cancer and serological recurrence after radical prostatectomy. RESULTS: PAP testing was not of value for predicting organ confined disease or positive margins. However, this test was useful for predicting the first serological PSA recurrence in the 3 periods (77 to 85% correct) and overall (82% correct, p < 0.001, odds ratio 6.06). The Kaplan-Meier disease-free survival rate at 4 years was 78.8% for men with PAP less than 3 ng./ml. and 38.8% for those with PAP 3 ng./ml. or greater, which was significant when pretreatment PSA was less than 10 ng./ml. (p = 0.047), 10 ng./ml. or greater (p = 0.012) and overall (p < 0.001). PAP testing added prognostic information to pretreatment PSA values and it was an independent predictor of recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: The widely available and inexpensive PAP assays of the 1990s are predictors of recurrence after radical prostatectomy. They should be included in future studies of prostate cancer recurrence modeling. However, they do not predict pathological stage or margin status.     

Comparison of digital rectal examination and biopsy results with the radical prostatectomy specimen

PURPOSE: Digital rectal examination is integral to staging prostate cancer. Ultrasound guided biopsy establishes the diagnosis, and it may provide useful information regarding disease grade and extent. Treatment decisions are largely based on information gained from digital rectal examination and biopsy but this information is only useful if it correlates with the radical prostatectomy specimen and prognosis. We correlated digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy results with a detailed analysis of the radical prostatectomy specimen. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The accuracy of an abnormal digital rectal examination for predicting the location and extent of cancer was assessed in 89 patients thought to have clinical stage T2 disease. We evaluated 155 patients with clinical stages T1c and T2 disease to correlate the location of positive biopsies with the tumor site in the prostate. Radical prostatectomy specimens were completely sectioned at 2 mm. intervals, and tumor extent and location were recorded. RESULTS: In 85 patients a unilateral lesion was suspicious on digital rectal examination, that is stage cT2. The final pathological review revealed cancer on the suspicious side in 82 cases (96%) with tumor confined to the same lobe in only 23 (27%), bilateral disease in 59 (69%) and tumor confined to the contralateral lobe in 3 (4%). In 4 patients with a palpable bilateral abnormality a bilateral lesion was confirmed on final pathological evaluation. Digital rectal examination demonstrated a 36 and 31% incidence of extracapsular tumor extension and positive surgical margins, respectively, on the clinically benign side. In 100 patients only unilateral biopsy was positive. The final pathological evaluation revealed cancer in the biopsy positive side in 95 cases (95%) with tumor confined to the ipsilateral lobe in only 26 (26%), bilateral disease in 69 (69%) and tumor confined to the contralateral lobe in 5 (5%). In 46 of the 55 patients (84%) with bilateral positive biopsies tumor involved both sides but the pathologist did not identify cancer in both lobes in 9 (16%). While 100 patients had a unilateral negative biopsy, analysis of the prostatectomy specimen revealed carcinoma in the benign lobe in 74 (74%). Moreover, extracapsular tumor extension and a positive surgical margin were observed on the biopsy negative side in 31% of the patients. The degree to which digital rectal examination and biopsy results confirmed the final pathological evaluation was assessed using the kappa statistic, which revealed only slight agreement with each factor. The correlation of digital rectal examination and biopsy results with the location of extracapsular extension and positive margins was evaluated by the Spearman coefficient of correlation, which indicated poor agreement. When patients with unilateral versus bilateral positive biopsy were compared with respect to prognostic parameters, the difference was statistically significant for initial serum prostate specific antigen, the percentage of surface involved by tumor, biopsy and final Gleason scores, and the incidence of extracapsular extension of tumor. CONCLUSIONS: Digital rectal examination and the interpretation of prostate biopsy are not accurate clinical tools for defining the location and extent of prostatic carcinoma. Bilateral positive biopsy may be useful as an adjunct to the current clinical staging system.     

Distinguishing clinically important from unimportant prostate cancers before treatment: value of systematic biopsies

PURPOSE: We assessed the ability of diagnostic tests to distinguish clinically unimportant cancers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We correlated T stage (based on digital examination and ultrasound), prostate specific antigen (PSA), PSA density and pathological features of cancer in systematic biopsy specimens with features of cancer in 170 radical prostatectomy specimens. Clinically unimportant cancers were defined as small (0.5 cm.3 or less), well or moderately differentiated and confined to the prostate. RESULTS: Of the patients 10% had an unimportant cancer. On logistic regression analysis the 2 significant predictors were maximum length of cancer in any core and PSA density. Of 12 patients with maximum cancer length 2 mm. or less and PSA density less than 0.1., 75% had an unimportant cancer compared to 5% of the remaining 158 (p < 0.0005). CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative analysis of systematic biopsy specimens combined with PSA density provides valuable staging information and helps to identify cancers of low biological potential.     

Novel staging tool for localized prostate cancer: a pilot study using genetic adaptive neural networks

PURPOSE: An estimated $1.5 billion is spent annually for direct medical expenses and an additional $2.5 billion for indirect costs for the management of prostate cancer. Today there are several procedures for staging prostate cancer, including lymph node dissection. Despite these procedures, the accuracy of predicting extracapsular disease remains low (range 37 to 63, mean 45%). Use of multiple staging procedures adds significantly to the costs of managing prostate cancer. Recently artificial intelligence based neural networks have become available for medical applications. Unlike traditional statistical methods, these networks do not assume linearity or homogeneity of variance and, thus, they are more accurate for clinical data. We applied this concept to staging localized prostate cancer and devised an algorithm that can be used for prostate cancer staging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our study comprised 1,200 men with clinically organ confined prostate cancer who underwent preoperative staging using serum prostate specific antigen, systematic biopsy and Gleason scoring before radical prostatectomy and lymphadenectomy. The performance of the neural network was validated for a subset of patients and network predictions were compared with actual pathological stage. Mean patient age was 62.9 years, mean serum prostate specific antigen 8.1 ng./ml. and mean biopsy Gleason 6. Of the patients 55% had organ confined disease, 27% positive margins, 8% seminal vesicle involvement and 7% lymph node disease. Of margin positive patients 30% also had seminal vesicle involvement, while of seminal vesicle positive patients 50% also had positive margins. RESULTS: The sensitivity of the network was 81 to 100%, and specificity was 72 to 75% for various predictions of margin, seminal vesicle and lymph node involvement. The negative predictive values tended to be relatively high for all 3 features (range 92 to 100%). The neural network missed only 8% of patients with margin positive disease, and 2% with lymph node and 0% with seminal vesicle involvement. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that neural networks may be useful as an initial staging tool for detection of extracapsular extension in patients with clinically organ confined prostate cancer. These networks preclude unnecessary staging tests for 63% of patients with clinically organ confined prostate cancer.     

Probability of seminal vesicle involvement in localized prostatic carcinoma. Significance in conformal radiotherapy

PURPOSE: The development of objective criteria for selecting patients for seminal vesicle irradiation on radical radiotherapy for prostate cancer will be important for successful planning of 3D conformal radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Based on morphometric studies from radical prostatectomy specimens, new imaging modalities with potential in the investigation of patients with gross seminal vesicle involvement and clinical factors with potential in the identification of patients with subclinical disease the development of objective guidelines is possible. RESULTS: Clinical tumor stage as determined by digital rectal examination, diagnostic tumor biopsy (Gleason Score), and pretherapy serum prostate-specific antigen value were significant factors for the probability of involvement of seminal vesicles. Studies show that seminal vesicle involvement is unlikely if the PSA is < 4 ng/ml or 4 to 10 ng/ml and Gleason Score < 7 and stage < or = T2b. In contrast, involvement of seminal vesicles is highly likely with levels above 20 ng/ml. In patients with PSA levels between 10 and 20 ng/ml and Gleason Score < 7 ultrasonographic findings with regard to tumor volume and localization will be useful to determine the extent of the target volume. For treatment planning a significant reduction in the volumes of irradiation to the rectum and bladder is evident when seminal vesicles were excluded. CONCLUSION: Prospective use of the objective criteria will be useful in the selection of patients for seminal vesicle involvement and should be an integral part in 3D conformal radiotherapy of prostate cancer.     

Intrathecal clonidine alleviates allodynia in neuropathic rats: interaction with spinal muscarinic and nicotinic receptors

PURPOSE: There has been a significant shift toward multimodality therapy to try to eradicate extracapsular disease better in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer. We assess the feasibility and complications of initial cryotherapy followed by radical prostatectomy, and evaluate the frequency and location of viable benign and malignant prostate tissue and positive surgical margins after this treatment combination. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 12 patients with clinical stage T3 cancer or clinical stages T1c to T2, Gleason score 8 to 10 cancer on the initial biopsy were treated with initial cryotherapy followed by open surgical exploration 2 to 8 days later. If pelvic lymph nodes were negative, radical prostatectomy was performed. Prostate specific antigen was measured approximately every 3 months postoperatively, and complications were assessed by retrospective chart review and a quality of life survey. RESULTS: Radical prostatectomy was aborted in 5 patients with positive pelvic lymph nodes. Of the 7 patients who underwent prostatectomy 4 had no residual prostate cancer in the specimen (pathological stage pT0 disease). All 7 of these patients had focal areas of viable normal prostate glands. Only 1 of the 7 patients had a positive surgical margin and biochemical failure (mean followup 22.6 months). The main complications of cryotherapy followed by radical prostatectomy were urinary incontinence and impotence. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant cryotherapy achieved complete tumor destruction in 4 of 7 patients with locally advanced prostate cancer. Cryotherapy followed by radical prostatectomy was associated with substantial morbidity, mainly in terms of urinary incontinence.     

Tumor volume and prostate specific antigen: implications for early detection and defining a window of curability

PURPOSE: We attempted to determine the relationship between tumor volume and extent of localized prostate cancer, as well as the interrelationships of tumor volume with prostate specific antigen (PSA) level, grade and stage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Serial whole mount sections from 128 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy were analyzed using a computer assisted volumetric program. Statistical evaluations were performed using logistic and simple regression analyses. RESULTS: The median tumor volume for patients with organ confined disease was significantly lower than for those with extraprostatic extension (1.25 versus 2.94 cc, p < 0.001). A significant incidence (32%) of small volume cancers (0.51 to 1.5 cc) exhibited extraprostatic extension while that of extraprostatic disease increased to 66% for patients with tumor volumes greater than 1.5 cc (p < 0.001). Of men with clinically significant (greater than 0.5 cc, or Gleason score 7 or more) pathological stage B disease 31% had a serum PSA value of 4 ng./ml. or less. Multivariate regression analysis of tumor volume as a function of PSA, grade and stage demonstrated that log PSA had the strongest association with tumor volume. Goodness-of-fit analysis (coefficient of determination) revealed that only 40 to 50% of the PSA levels are explained by tumor volume. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that the window of curability for prostate cancer decreases significantly once the tumor grows to a volume greater than 1.5 cc, and that grade and tumor volume are more significantly related to stage than PSA.     

Radiotherapy for high grade clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate

PURPOSE: We defined the efficacy of radiotherapy for the treatment of high grade (Gleason scores 8 to 10) adenocarcinoma of the prostate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 50 patients underwent radiotherapy with curative intent for clinically localized prostate cancer with Gleason scores of 8 to 10 at 1 of 4 facilities affiliated with the University of California San Francisco. Patients were considered to have biochemical failure if they had a significant increase in prostate specific antigen (PSA) of 0.5 ng./ml. per year, an increase in PSA to greater than 1.0 ng./ml. or a positive biopsy. RESULTS: Among the 50 patients median PSA was 22.7 ng./ml. (range 1.3 to 93.4). Tumors were clinical stage T1 or T2 in 46% of the cases and stage T3 or T4 in 54%. The overall actuarial probability of freedom from biochemical failure at 4 years was 23%. In a multivariate analysis including all patients pretreatment PSA was the only predictor of PSA failure, with 64% free of progression if the pretreatment PSA was 10 ng./ml. or less compared to only 16% at 3 years if PSA was more than 10 ng./ml. (p = 0.01). In a multivariate analysis restricted to patients with PSA less than 20 ng./ml. 83% of those treated to more than 71 Gy. were free of progression compared to 0% for those treated to less than 71 Gy. (p = 0.03). In a multivariate analysis PSA 10 ng./ml. or less (related risk 11.4, p = 0.02), T stage 1 or 2 (relative risk 3.8, p = 0.05) and radiation dose more than 71 Gy. (relative risk 4.0, p = 0.06) were associated with a favorable outcome. CONCLUSIONS: At 4 years the freedom from PSA failure following radiotherapy for high grade prostate cancer was comparable to previously reported surgical series. The high failure rate among patients with PSA greater than 20 ng./ml. suggests that these patients should be considered for investigational approaches. The apparent improvement in freedom from progression with the use of higher doses provides reason for optimism.     

Hormonal treatment before radical prostatectomy: a 3-year followup

PURPOSE: Hormonal treatment administered before radical prostatectomy has been shown to decrease the rate of positive surgical margins. We determine whether preoperative hormonal treatment has any impact on the subsequent failure rate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively evaluated 122 patients with stages T1bNxM0 to T3aNxM0, grades 1 to 3 prostate cancer, including 64 randomly assigned to immediate radical retropubic prostatectomy and 58 randomly assigned to radical retropubic prostatectomy preceded by 3 months of pretreatment with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist. We performed intention to treat analysis on the data with failure defined as lymph node involvement, serum prostate specific antigen greater than 0.5 ng./ml., or the need for postoperative hormonal or radiation adjuvant treatment. RESULTS: The positive margin rate was 23.6 versus 45.5% in the pretreatment plus prostatectomy versus prostatectomy only groups (p = 0.016). There were 20 failures (34.5%) in the pretreatment plus prostatectomy subgroup and 26 (40.6%) in the prostatectomy only group (p = 0.48). A negative surgical margin was associated with a significantly lower risk of progression than a positive surgical margin (20.8 versus 50.0%, p = 0.0016), and progression was delayed by approximately 1 year after hormonal pretreatment. However, at a median followup of 38 months there was no difference in progression-free survival (p = 0.57). CONCLUSIONS: Although hormonal pretreatment significantly decreased the positive margin rate, it did not result in any difference in progression-free survival when followup exceeded 3 years. Thus, our current results do not support the routine administration of hormonal treatment before radical prostatectomy.     

Screening for prostate cancer

In an attempt to detect prostate cancer when the tumor is still confined to the prostate, a screening program was established. We studied the efficacy of digital rectal examination (DRE) and serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in the early detection of prostate cancer. One thousand men aged 50-75 years underwent DRE and serum PSA determination. Transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsies were obtained in each case of a suspicious DRE. Six systematic biopsies were performed if the PSA level was > 10 ng/ml, even if DRE and transrectal ultrasonography revealed no areas suspicious of cancer. A suspicious DRE was noted in 11.5% of the subjects; 16% had elevated levels of serum PSA (> 4 ng/ml) and 3.9% had serum PSA > 10 ng/ml. Biopsies were obtained from 90 patients, of which 31 were positive for prostate cancer. The cancer detection rate was 2.2% for DRE, 2.0% for PSA > 10 ng/ml, and 3.1% for the two methods combined. Clinical staging revealed that in 29 of the 31 patients with prostate cancer, the tumor was confined to the prostate: Stage A in 9 cases and stage B in 20 cases. Only two patients had clinically advanced cancer, and 22 patients underwent radical prostatectomy. Pathological examination disclosed biologically significant tumors in 91% of the cases in terms of tumor volume and grade. Although there is little evidence that screening will result in the reduction of the disease-specific mortality rate, early detection of prostate cancer by DRE, serum PSA, and transrectal ultrasound should be encouraged.     

Prevalence and pathological extent of prostate cancer in men with prostate specific antigen levels of 2.9 to 4.0 ng./ml

Various authors have recommended different values for the upper limit of normal for the monoclonal prostate specific antigen (PSA) assay (for example 4.0 ng./ml. or less by the manufacturer Hybritech or 2.8 ng./ml. or less by others). To our knowledge, no studies have examined the prevalence and pathological extent of prostate cancer detectable by needle biopsy in ambulatory volunteers with PSA levels in the range of 2.9 to 4.0 ng./ml. We evaluated 121 volunteers by rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography with PSA levels in that range. We performed ultrasound-directed needle biopsy of the prostate if abnormal findings were present on either examination. The prevalence of detectable prostate cancer in this group was 7.2% (8 of 111). All 8 patients had pathologically organ confined cancer, and only 2 had suspicious findings on rectal examination but all had abnormal or suspicious ultrasound findings. We believe that the 7.2% yield from ultrasonography and biopsy in patients with a PSA level of 2.9 to 4.0 ng./ml. is too low to justify further invasive evaluation. Rather, we recommend careful followup and monitoring of these patients with serial PSA measurements and rectal examination, and advise performance of ultrasonography and biopsy if the rectal examination becomes suspicious for cancer or the PSA level increases above 4.0 ng./ml.