The effect of polymerization mode on mechanical properties of commercial self-adhesive cements associated with hydroxyapatite

This study aimed to evaluate the mechanical properties of self-adhesive resin cements mixed with hydroxyapatite, as a function of the polymerization activation mode among a variety of commercial self-adhesive cements. Four cements (MaxCem Elite, Bifix SE, G-Cem, and RelyX U200) were mixed, combined with hydroxyapatite, dispensed into molds, and distributed into three groups, according to polymerization protocols: IP (immediate photoactivation for 40 s); DP (delayed photoactivation, 10 min self-curing plus 40 s light-activated); and CA (chemical activation, no light exposure). After polymerization, the specimens were stored at 37 °C for 24 h. After storage, a three-point bending test was performed at 0.5 mm/min. Flexural strength (S) and flexural modulus (E) were calculated. The fractured surfaces were analyzed with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) technique. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA/Tukey’s test (5%). The tested parameters varied according with the resin cements and polymerization protocols. Regarding the S means, MaxCem Elite, G-Cem, and RelyX U200 demonstrated dependence on photoactivation (immediate or delayed), whereas Bifix SE exhibited no dependence on the polymerization protocol. The same was observed for Bifix SE for the E means, which presented the best balanced formulation, irrespective of the activation protocol. SEM analysis exhibited the presence of bubbles and porosities in all of the fractured surfaces. Chemical activation is not a guarantee of a complete polymerization for most of the cements tested. Only one of the cements maintained its mechanical properties when chemically activated, important characteristic in clinical situations in which the curing light penetrating the bulk material can be attenuated or scattered.     

Bonding ability of self-adhesive resin-cements after dentin biomodification with hyaluronic acid

Purpose: The present study evaluated the influence of the hyaluronic acid (HA) on the bonding ability of self-adhesive resin cements to dentin regarding the bond strength. Eighty bovine incisors were ground flat to obtain a 2-mm thick slices which received conical preparations. The specimens were randomly distributed into 4 groups (n = 15) according to the dentin pretreatment (1 – control: untreated dentin; 2 – application of HA) and the evaluation time (1 – control: immediate evaluation; 2 – hydrolytic degradation: 6 months of storage in water at 37 °C). Preparations received the application of a self-adhesive resin cement (RelyX U200 or MaxCem Elite). Push-out bond strength test was conducted (0.5 mm/min). The bond strength data was submitted to two-way ANOVA/Tukey’s test (α = 0.05). For U200, no significance was observed when comparing the immediate (24 h) and 6 months means for the control groups (unexposed specimens). Previous application of HA to dentin significantly reduced the bond strength of U200 to dentin in both evaluation times (p < 0.05). HA had no significant influence on the push-out bond strength means for the cement MAX in both evaluation times (p > 0.05). The type 1 failure mode (adhesive mode) occurred in 100% of the specimens, irrespective of the dentin treatment or evaluation times. Pretreatment of dentin with HA produces a material-dependent influence on the push-out bond strength. The bonding ability of RelyX U200 is negatively influenced by the pretreatment of dentin with HA, whereas the biomodification of dentin with this bioactive agent causes no impact for the cement MaxCem Elite.     

Effect of Thermocycling on the Bond Strength of Self-Adhesive Resin Cements Used for Luting CAD/CAM Ceramics to Human Dentin

The aim of the study was to evaluate the influence of thermocycling on the shear bond strength of self-adhesive, self-etching resin cements luted to human dentin and computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) ceramics. Three modern self-adhesive dental cements (Maxcem Elite, RelyX U200, Panavia SA) were used to lute three CAD/CAM ceramics (IPS Empress CAD, IPS e.max CAD, IPS e.max ZirCAD) onto the dentin. One conventional cement (Panavia V5) served as a control. After preparation, the samples were subjected to thermocycling as a method of artificial aging of dental materials applied to simulate long-term use in oral conditions. Shear bond strength was evaluated according to PN-EN ISO 29022:2013-10 and failure modes were observed under a light microscope. Statistical analysis was performed. The study demonstrated that a combination of ceramics and cements directly impacts the bond strength. The highest bond strength was observed in Panavia V5, lower in Panavia SA and Maxcem Elite and the lowest–in RelyX U200. Adhesive failure between human dentin and cements was the most common failure mode. Moreover, thermocycling highly decreased bond strength of self-adhesive, self-etching cements.     

Deproteinization stabilises dentin bonding of self-adhesive resin cements after thermocycling

This study examined the effect of deproteinization on the microtensile dentin bond strength (µTBS) and nanoleakage (NL) of conventional and self-adhesive resin cements after 24 h or after 20,000 thermocycles. Occlusal dentin of thirty-two human molars were distributed into four groups according to the type of cement used: conventional or self-adhesive; and the strategy of luting: RelyX ARC/Single Bond 2 (RAc) following the manufacturer׳s instructions (control), RelyX ARC/Single Bond 2 (RAd) applied after dentin deproteinization; RelyX U200 (RUc) following the manufacturer´s instructions (control); RelyX U200 (RUd) applied after dentin deproteinization. The specimens were cut into non-trimmed dentin–composite sticks and the half sticks of each group were subdivided into two subgroups: 24 h water storage and after 20,000 thermal cycles, before microtensile bond test. For NL, 5 bonded sticks from each subgroup were prepared and analyzed under SEM. Three-way ANOVA showed that the dentin deproteinization increased the µTBS of both cements, although the RAd group showed a decrease on the µTBS after thermocycling. Chi-square test showed significant loss of specimens by premature failure for the groups after thermocycling, except for the RUd group. The dentin deproteinization improved the initial µTBS and decreases the NL of both cements tested, but, after thermocycling, this technique is only effective for RelyX U200.     

Bond strength and chemical interaction of self-adhesive resin cements according to the dentin region

The aim of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness and level of chemical interaction of self-adhesive resin cements (SRCs) according to the dentin region. One hundred eight sound human third molars and three SRCs were selected: Bifix SE (Voco), Maxcem Elite (Kerr), and RelyX U200 (3M ESPE). Ninety human molars were used for the bond strength test and 18 teeth for the X-ray diffraction (XRD) characterization. A flat surface of superficial, deep, or axial dentin was exposed. For bond strength evaluation, 90 indirect composite resin restorations (10 mm in diameter, 2.0 mm-thick) were built and cemented with one of the SRCs according to the manufacturer's instructions. The restored teeth were then cut into sticks with cross-sectional areas of 0.8 mm² and tested in tensile at a speed of 0.5 mm/min (n=10). The results of bond strength were statistically analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α=0.05). The fractured specimens were classified under SEM. The remaining teeth were further sectioned in order to build dentin fragments with 2.0 mm² of area and 0.2 mm in thickness for XRD analysis. In general, significantly higher bond strength was found when bonding to axial and deep dentin compared to superficial dentin. Comparing the bonding effectiveness of the SRCs, taking into account the mean bond strength obtained in the 3 dentin regions, the study found no significant difference (p>0.05). Although RelyX U200 showed similar bond strength irrespective of the dentin region (p>0.05), the bonding results of the other 2 SRCs varied significantly (p<0.05). There was a higher incidence of cohesive failure in the SRCs for all groups. The XRD analysis detected different perceptual reductions of hydroxyapatite crystallinity for all SRCs, indicating a particular chemical interaction in each experimental condition. Thus, it can be concluded that the bond strength and chemical interaction of the SRCs can vary significantly according to the dentin region.     

Adhesion of conventional and self-adhesive resin cements to indirect resin composite using different surface conditioning methods

This study evaluated the adhesion of conventional and self-adhesive resin cements to indirect resin composite (IRC) using different surface conditioning methods. Cylindrical IRC specimens (N = 192) were randomly assigned to four surface conditioning methods (n = 8 per group): (a) Control group, (b) Hydrofluoric acid, (c) Tribochemical silica-coating, and (d) 50 μm Al₂O₃ air-abrasion. Specimen surfaces were finished using silicon carbide papers up to 600 grit under water irrigation, rinsed and dried. Direct composite blocks were bonded to IRC specimens using three conventional resin cements (Multilink, Panavia F2.0, and Resicem) and three self-adhesive resin cements (RelyX U100, Gcem, Speed Cem). Specimens were subjected to shear bond strength test in a Universal Testing Machine (0.5 mm/min). Failure types were categorized as mixed, adhesive and cohesive. Data were analyzed using 2-way ANOVA and Tukey’s tests. Two-parameter Weibull modulus, scale (m) and shape (0) were calculated. The bond strength results (MPa) were significantly affected by the surface conditioning method (p < 0.0001) and cement type (p < 0.001). For Panavia F2.0, Resicem, air-abrasion with 50 μm Al₂O₃ significantly increased the results (22.6 ± 6.5, 26.2 ± 6.5, respectively) compared to other conditioning methods (13.6 ± 1.4–21.9 ± 3.1) but for Multilink, hydrofluoric acid etching (20.5 ± 3.5) showed significantly higher results (p < 0.01). For the self-adhesive resin cements, air-abrasion with 50 μm Al₂O₃ significantly increased the results compared to other conditioning methods, except for RelyX U100 (p < 0.05). After air-abrasion with Al₂O₃, Gcem, (11.64), RelyX U100 (9.05), and SpeedCem (8.29) presented higher Weilbul moduli. Exclusively cohesive failure in the IRC was observed with RelyX U100 and Speedcem after Al₂O₃ air-abrasion.     

Endodontic irrigants effect on long-term intraradicular adhesion of resin cements

The aim of this study was to evaluate over time the bond strength of dual-cure and self-adhesive resin cements used for bonding fiberglass posts following irrigation with different solutions. Ninety roots from single-rooted premolars were selected and divided into 6 groups (n = 15) according to the resin cement, dual-cure or self-adhesive (RelyX ARC and RelyX U100) or the endodontic irrigant used (2% chlorhexidine digluconate - CH, 1% sodium hypochlorite - SH and deionized distilled water – control). Following post cementation, the roots were cross-sectioned in order to obtain two slices from each root third (cervical, mid and apical). The specimens were stored for 7 or 180 days in water and the push-out bond strength test applied. The data was analyzed using three-way ANOVA and Tukey Kramer. The interaction endodontic irrigants-resin cement vs. storage time was significant (p = 0.008), where 7 days of storage induced no difference between the groups, however, after 180 days, the groups for which CH or SH combined with RelyX U100 were used showed higher bond strength values than RelyX ARC, regardless of the irrigant solution. There was no difference between the use of RelyX ARC after 7 and 180 days of storage. For Rely X U100 180 days of storage increased the push-out bond strength when either CH or SH was used. The dual-cure and self-adhesive resin cements associated with CH or SH demonstrated similar immediate bond strength performance. The self-adhesive cement, however, showed improved bond strength over time when either irrigant was used.     

Effects of simulated pulpal pressure,mechanical and thermocycling challenge on the microtensile bond strength of resin luting cements

This study aimed at comparing the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) of three simplified luting strategies after different aging processes. Sixty human molars were prepared to expose flat middle dentin surfaces which received the following luting procedures: (i) SB+ARC – two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive+conventional resin cement (Adper Singlebond 2+RelyX ARC, 3M-ESPE); (ii) S3+PAN – one-step self-etch adhesive+conventional resin cement (Clearfil S3+Panavia F2.0, Kuraray Medical); (iii) U200 – self-adhesive resin cement (RelyX U200,3M-ESPE). The specimens were finally restored by indirect resin composite procedures (Filtek Z100,3M-ESPE). The aging regimens were water storage at 37 °C for one week (control), one week of 20 cm H₂O simulated pulpal pressure (SPP), 200,000 mechanical loading (ML) cycles, or 5000 thermal cycles (TC). The µTBS data was analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α=0.05). SB+ARC showed significantly higher µTBS for control and all aging processes (p<0.001). Nevertheless, TC had no effect on the bond strength of SB+ARC. No difference in µTBS was observed between S3+PAN and U200 after SPP (p=0.251), but significant lower values were found for U200 after ML (p=0.010) besides being superior in the control groups (p<0.001). For U200, all ageing regimens induced significant reductions in the bond strength (p<0.001) with a more pronounced negative effect after ML. S3+PAN showed significant lower bond strength (p=0.010) only after ML aging. Two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive associated with dual-curing conventional resin cement may present the highest overall µTBS. However, the use of S3 one-step self-etch adhesive along with conventional resin cements may provide the most stable luting performance under the tested aging strategy.     

Effects of different surface treatments of zirconia on the bond strength of self-adhesive resinous cement

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of different zirconia surface treatments on the bond strength of two self-adhesive resinous cements (SARC).

Methods: Two hundred and eight cylindrical specimens were obtained from Y-TZP zirconia (half with diameter 3.2 mm and half with 4.8 mm). After sintering and polishing, specimens were divided into four groups (n = 26), according to surface treatment: Control (no treatment); Sandblasting (Al₂O₃ particles); Rocatec (Al₂O₃ particles, tribochemical silica coating and silane application); Laser (Nd: YAG laser: 20 Hz, 100 mJ, 0.2 J/cm²). The surface roughness (Ra) was evaluated after the surface treatments, and the groups were divided into two subgroups (n = 13), according to the SARC tested: RelyX U200 and Bifix SE. The 2.2-mm cylinders were bonded to 4.8-mm cylinders and stressed until failure under shear using a universal testing machine. Bond strength and Ra were analyzed using ANOVA, and Tukey’s test (α = 0.05).

Results: Surface treatment was significant (p < 0.0001), but cement type (p = 0.73) was not. Related to roughness, significant differences were found for the treatment type (p < 0.0001), with laser being the treatment with higher Ra values.

Conclusions: Nd:YAG laser produced a rougher surface and a higher bond strength compared with sandblasting, silicatization, and control groups.     

Long-term bond strength of fiber posts cement to dentin with self-adhesive or conventional resin cements

The aim of this study was to evaluate the immediate and the long-term push-out bond strength of glass fiber posts (GFP) cemented with conventional or self-adhesive dual-curing resin cements, at different root depths. Prior to cementation, the GFP (Reforpost #3, Angelus) were etched with 37% phosphoric acid for 30 s followed by silane for 1 min. Thirty canine roots were divided into two groups (n = 15) according to resin cement type: ARC – dual resin cement (RelyX ARC/3M ESPE) combined with an three-step etch-and-rinse adhesive (Adper Scotch Bond Multi-Purpose Plus 3M/ESPE) or U200 – self-adhesive resin cement (RelyX U200/3M ESPE). The manufacturer’s instructions were followed. After 48 h, the roots were cross-sectioned at three different depths, resulting in serial slices corresponding to the cervical, middle, and apical root thirds. Slices were randomly divided into two groups, according to the period of water storage prior to push-out bond strength analysis: 48 h or 180 days. The data (MPa) were analyzed using three-way ANOVA for randomized blocks (p < 0.05), which showed no significant interaction between the three factors (p = 0.716). The main study factors were also proven not significant (cement: p = 0.711; time: 0.288; root third: p = 0.646). In conclusion, root depth, cement type (self-adhesive or conventional), and storage in water for 180 days did not influence the bond strength of GFP to intracanal dentin.     

Influence of surface energy parameters of dental self-adhesive resin cements on bond strength to dentin

The purpose of this study was to determine the surface energy parameters of dental self-adhesive resin cements (SRCs) and to measure their bond strength to dentin. Six dental SRCs (RelyX Unicem Clicker, RU; Maxcem Elite, ME; BisCem, BC; Clearfil SA Luting, SA; Multilink Speed, MS; seT PP, SP) and one resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RelyX Luting 2, RL; control) were tested. Smear layer-covered bovine dentin was used as bonding substrate. Using the dynamic sessile drop method, surface energy, surface energy components, degree of hydrophobicity/hydrophilicity (expressed as ΔG _sws using thermodynamic notation), and apparent surface energies for each material were calculated. The luting cements were bonded to the dentin and stored in water at 37?°C for 24?h prior to shear bond strength test (n?=?10). Pearson correlation analysis was applied to detect possible correlations between surface energy parameters and measured shear bond strength (α?=?0.05). RU, SA, and MS produced negative ΔG _sws values (hydrophobic), whereas ME, BC, SP, and RL yielded positive ones (hydrophilic). RU had the highest value among all six SRCs tested, the value for MS being statistically equivalent (p?=?0.785). The base component, ΔG _sws, and surface energy determined with water showed significant negative linear correlations with dentin bond strength (r/p?=??0.801/0.030, ?0.900/0.006, and ?0.892/0.007, respectively). These results suggest that bonding to smear layer-covered bovine dentin was governed by the base component and the hydrophobicity/hydrophilicity of the SRCs.     

Shear Bond Strength of Indirect Composites Luted with Three New Self-Adhesive Resin Cements to Dentin

The aim of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strengths of indirect composites (those cured outside the mouth) luted by three different, recently developed, self-adhesive resin cements to dentin. Seventy caries-free mandibular third molar teeth embedded in acrylic resin and with exposed dentin surfaces were used. Teeth were randomly divided into seven groups. The following application protocols were carried out: a) Group 1 (control group)—direct composite resin restoration (Alert) with total-etch adhesive system (Bond 1 primer/adhesive); b) Group 2—indirect composite restoration (Estenia) luted by a resin cement (Cement-It) combined with the same total-etch adhesive; c) Group 3—direct composite resin restoration with self-etch adhesive system (Nano-Bond); d) Group 4—indirect composite restoration luted by the resin cement combined with the same self-etch adhesive; e) Groups 5–7—indirect composite restoration luted with self-adhesive resin cements (RelyX Unicem®, Maxcem®, and Embrace WetBond®, respectively) onto untreated dentin surfaces. Shear bond strengths of the groups were performed with a universal testing device. Results were statistically analysed by student-t and one way ANOVA tests. The fractured surfaces were also examined by SEM. The indirect composite restorations luted with the self-adhesive resin cements (Groups 5–7) showed successful results compared with the other groups (p < 0.05). Group 4 showed the weakest bond strength (p > 0.05). Open dentin tubules were observed on the total-etch adhesive applied surfaces whereas a smear rich layer was found by SEM on the self-etch adhesive applied surfaces. The new universal self-adhesive resins may be considered an alternative for luting the indirect composite restorations onto the untreated dentin surfaces.     

Effect of dentinal surface preparation on the bonding of self-adhesive luting cements

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the bond strength and the interaction morphology of self-adhesive resin luting cements (SLCs) to dentin prepared with different methods. Four SLCs were used: RelyX U100^®, RelyX U200^®, Clearfil SA Luting^®, and SmartCem2^®. A flat dentin surface of 40 human molars was exposed and each tooth was sectioned in four tooth-quarters, which were distributed into four groups according to the SLC used to cement indirect resin composite restorations. The tooth-quarters of each group were then distributed in four subgroups according to the method used for dentin preparation: flat-ended cylindrical fine-grit diamond, flat-ended cylindrical median-grit diamond, flat-ended cylindrical plain-cut tungsten carbide, or abraded with #600-grit SiC paper (control). The restored tooth-quarters were sectioned to obtain beams (0.8?mm²) and submitted to the microtensile bond strength test (n?=?10). The results were analyzed using two-way ANOVA/Tukey (α?=?0.05). Forty-four additional teeth were used for micromorphological investigation of the SLC/dentin interface and of the topographic aspect of the dentin surfaces after application of the SLCs. Only the bond strength of RelyX U200 was significantly influenced by the surface preparation. No interference was identified on the micromorphological aspect of the bonding interfaces. The topographic investigation of the dentinal surfaces showed that the SLCs were not able to effectively remove the smear layer and etch the underlying dentin, irrespective of the preparation method. So, the interference of the dentin preparation on the bond strength of SLCs is material dependent, but don’t influence the micromorphologic aspect of the interaction zone.     

Micromorphology of resin–dentin interfaces using self-adhesive and conventional resin cements: A confocal laser and scanning electron microscope analysis

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the resin–dentin morphology created by four dual-cured resin cements. Materials and Methods: Two self-adhesive resin cements (RelyX Unicem, 3 M ESPE and Clearfil SA Luting, Kuraray Med.) and two conventional resin cementing systems (RelyX ARC, 3 M ESPE and Clearfil Esthetic Cement, Kuraray Med.) were evaluated. Occlusal dentin surfaces of 32 extracted human third molars were flattened to expose coronal dentin. Teeth were assigned to 8 groups (n=4), according to resin cement products and microscope analysis (SEM: scanning electron microscope or CLSM: confocal laser scanning microscopy). For CLSM, two different fluorescent dyes, fluorescein isothiocyanate–dextran and rhodamine B, were incorporated into the adhesive system and resin cement, respectively. The resin cements were applied to indirect composite resin disks, which were cemented to dentin surface according to manufacturer's instructions. After 24 h, all restored teeth were vertically sectioned into 1-mm-thick slabs for SEM or CLSM analyses. Results: Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus/RelyX ARC cementing system formed a thin hybrid layer and resin tags penetration into the dentin tubules. Clearfil DC Bond/Clearfil Esthetic Cement showed only short resin tags. Neither hybrid layer nor resin tags were detected for self-adhesive resin cements. Conclusion: Representative SEM and CLSM images provided resin–dentin interfaces variability among resin cements studied.     

The effect of different cementing strategies and adhesive interface aging on microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of lithium disilicate ceramics to dentin

This study evaluated the effect of different cementing strategies and adhesive interface aging on microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of lithium disilicate ceramic (IPS e.max CAD) to dentin. Forty coronal dentin fragments were randomly assigned to four groups according to the cementing strategy used to bond lithium disilicate ceramic to coronal dentin surface (n = 10): U200 (self-adhesive resin cement (RC) RelyX U200®/3 M ESPE), SBU (single-step self-etching adhesive system (AS) Single Bond Universal®/3 M ESPE + RelyX ARC®/3 M ESPE RC), AdperSB (two-step etch-and-rinse AS Single Bond 2®/3 M + RelyX ARC®/3 M ESPE RC) and Scotchbond (three-step etch-and-rinse AS Scotchbond Multi-Purpose®/3 M + RelyX ARC®/3 M RC). After 48 h, the ceramic-tooth blocks were sectioned perpendicular to the adhesive interface in the form of sticks and randomly subdivided into two groups according to when they were to be submitted to μTBS testing: immediately or 6 months after storage in water. Some sticks were kept for analysis of the adhesive interface by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The μTBS test was performed in a universal testing machine (0.5 mm/min). The data (MPa) were analyzed using split-plot ANOVA and Tukey’s test (α = 0.05). Water storage decreased μTBS in all cementing strategies. The μTBS was greatest in the Scotchbond group and lowest in the U200 group, at both storage times. No signs of interface degradation were detected under SEM after water storage. In conclusion, water storage decreased bond strength, regardless of the adhesive cementation strategy, and that the three-step adhesive system/dual-cure resin cement ultimately performed better in terms of bond strength.     

Effect of different mechanical cleansing protocols of dentin for recementation procedures on micro-shear bond strength of conventional and self-adhesive resin cements

Service life of debonded indirect dental restorations could be prolonged by recementation. This process requires removal of cement remnants from dentin. This study evaluated the effect of different mechanical cleansing protocols of dentin for recementation procedures on micro-shear bond strength (μSBS) of conventional and self-adhesive resin cements. The labial surfaces mandibular incisors (N=200) were ground with a low speed saw to expose the coronal dentin. The teeth were randomly divided into two subgroups (n: 100 per group) and received either (a) conventional (Panavia F 2.0, Kuraray, PAN) or (b) self-adhesive (Clearfil SA, Kuraray, CSA) resin cement. Resin cements were condensed into polyethylene molds incrementally and photo polymerized using an LED polymerization unit. Specimens were stored in distilled water at 37 °C for 24 h and subjected to μSBS (0.5 mm/min). Resin cement remnants on bonded dentin surfaces were removed using by (a) composite finishing bur (cb), (b) tungsten carbide bur (ob), (c) ultrasonic scaler tip (sc) or (d) pumice-water slurry (pw). Non-cleaned teeth acted as the control group (cn) (n: 20 per subgroup). After cleaning, the same cement type was rebonded simulating clinical recementation. Failure types were analyzed using optical microscope and Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM). Data (MPa) were analyzed using Wilcoxon Signed Ranks, Mann-Whitney U and Bonferroni tests (α=0.05). Overall, CSA (6.42±2.96) showed significantly lower results than that of PAN cement (7.88±3.49) (p<0.05). All cleansing protocols (4.29±2.17 to 5.82±2.5) showed significantly lower results than that of the control group (9.84±4.88) for PAN cement. For CSA cement, all cleansing protocols presented non-significant results (4.25±2.74 to 6.44±2.4 MPa) compared to control group (p>0.05) expect cb method (3.42±1.47) (p<0.05). Remnants of cements were detected on dentin surfaces in all groups at varying degrees. SEM showed that while using pumice-water slurry was the least effective for PAN, tungsten carbide bur was the most effective for both cements. All other methods showed similar cleansing efficacy. None of the cleansing protocols yielded to complete removal of resin cement rest on dentin upon recementation for both cements tested.     

The effect of post surface silanization and luting agents on the push-out bond strengths of adhesively inserted fiber reinforced posts

The effect of silane treatment on the push-out bond strengths of three different luting agents to fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) posts after thermocycling was evaluated.Sixty single-rooted human maxillary central incisors were sectioned below the cemento-enamel junction, and the roots were endodontically treated. RelyX Fiber Posts (size #2) were inserted using etch-and-rinse, self-etch, and self-adhesive luting agents (cementing agents). For half of the specimen in each group, the fiber posts were treated with a silane coupling agent. Bonded specimens were cut (2-mm-thick sections) and push-out tests were performed (crosshead speed, 0.5 mm/min). Failure modes were evaluated using a stereomicroscope at original magnification ×40.For each luting agent the use of silane did not result in any statistically significant difference at any level of the root compared to those of the control groups except for Variolink II and RelyX Unicem luting agents in apical root section (p<0.05; one-way ANOVA). The post hoc analysis showed that regardless of the pre-treatment procedures, Variolink II achieved significantly higher bond strengths than Panavia F 2.0 and RelyX Unicem in all root sections (p<0.05).The use of a silane coupling agent had no influence on bond strengths depending on the luting agent used, whereas the type of luting agent (etch-and-rinse, self-etch, and self-adhesive) appeared to be a significant influence on the push-out bond strength values independent of the pre-treatment used. Therefore, pre-treatment of fiber posts with a silane coupling agent does not seem to be mandatory, which saves time in the clinical situation.     

P‐V‐T measurements on PMMA : PbTiO3 polymer‐ceramic composites with tunable thermal expansion

Results of Pressure‐Volume‐Temperature measurement on Poly(methyl methacrylate) : Lead Titanate, PMMA : PbTiO₃, composite system in the pressure and temperature range 0–200 MPa and 300–473 K, respectively, are presented. The thermal expansion coefficient in PMMA : PbTiO₃ composite is expected to be quite complex because the polymer has positive thermal expansion coefficient, whereas the filler has a negative thermal expansion coefficient. In this present article, the effect of pressure on the volumetric thermal expansion coefficient in PMMA : PbTiO₃ composite system is presented. It is shown that thermal expansion coefficient of the polymer can be tailored by adding filler which has negative thermal expansion coefficient. Theoretically, a simple additive rule is formulated which can predict the variation of expansion coefficient in the PMMA : PbTiO₃ composite system. The limitation of the additive rule is also discussed. It is also shown that the glass transition temperature depends on filler concentration and also has strong pressure dependence. The reasons for large pressure dependence are discussed. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2010     

The effect of MDP-based primer on shear bond strength of various cements to two different ceramic materials

The aim of this study was to determine the effect of 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP)-based primer on the shear bond strengths of thermally aged self-adhesive and conventional adhesive resin cements and zinc phosphate cement to zirconia and lithium disilicate substructures. Sixty zirconia (Z) and 60 lithium disilicate (L) disk specimens were cut from ceramic blocks. Each group was divided into six subgroups (n = 10). Half of the specimens of each ceramic group were treated with primer (P) and the other half was remained untreated. Three types of cement were applied: zinc phosphate cement [(ZPC) (Hoffmann Harmonic Shades)]; self-adhesive resin cement [(SAC) (RelyX U200)]; conventional adhesive resin cement [(CAC) (C&B)]. The specimens were subjected to thermal aging procedure for 1 week under 37 °C water bath. Shear bond strength (SBS) was determined using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Data were analyzed with three-way (ANOVA). Pairwise comparisons and interactions between groups were analyzed by using Tukey’s simultaneous confidence intervals. There was no significant difference between the SBS values of SAC-Z (11,47 ± 0,47) and SAC-ZP (11,39 ± 0,42) (p > 0.05). However, the SBS values of SAC-L (12.34 ± 0,55) and SAC-LP (12,50 ± 0,49) were significantly higher than those of SAC-Z and SAC-ZP (p < 0.00). The use of primer significantly increased the SBS value of CAC-ZP (8,05 ± 0,55) when compared to the SBS value of CAC-Z (3,53 ± 0,41) (p < 0.00). Resin cement that contains methacrylate monomers with phosphoric ester functional groups exhibited reliable bond to zirconia. However, the use of an MDP-based primer may not further improve its bond strength.     

Micro-computerized tomography analysis of cement voids and pull-out strength of glass fiber posts luted with self-adhesive and glass-ionomer cements in the root canal

This study evaluated the pull-out strength of different glass fiber posts and measured volume of cement and voids in the cement in the root canal utilizing micro-computerized tomography (micro-CT) analysis after they were cemented with two different luting cements. Canine teeth (N = 40) were endodontically treated and randomly divided into four groups depending on the fiber post and the cement type (n = 10 per group) as follows: Group RU: (RelyX + RelyX U200), Group PU: (PINpost + RelyX U200), Group RF: (RelyX + FujiCEM 2), Group PF: (PINpost + FujiCEM 2). Each tooth was scanned using micro-CT and the percentage of cement and void volume at the coronal, middle, and apical levels was calculated. Pull-out tests were performed by applying tensile load parallel to the long axis of the posts (0.5 mm/min). Data were analyzed using, ANOVA, Kruskal–Wallis, and Mann–Whitney U tests (α = 0.05). Regardless of cement type, the percentage (%) of cement volume in the RelyX post groups (RU:31–36; RF:29–40) was significantly higher than that in the PINpost groups (PU:19–23; PF:18–22) (p < 0.05). The percentage of void volume at the PINpost groups (PU:6–11; PF:8–13) was significantly lower than that in the RelyX groups (RU:2; RF:3) (p < 0.05). No significant differences were observed in pull-out strength (N) between the four experimental groups (RU:358.8 ± 56.2; RF:299 ± 64.8; PU:311.9 ± 61.3; PF:293.1 ± 91.3) (p > 0.05). The micro-CT analysis demonstrated that the percentage of cement and void volumes vary depending on the type of fiber post and cement used. No correlation between cement, void volume, and pull-out strength was observed.