Stable semantics for disjunctive programs

We introduce the stable model semantics fordisjunctive logic programs and deductive databases, which generalizes the stable model semantics, defined earlier for normal (i.e., non-disjunctive) programs. Depending on whether only total (2-valued) or all partial (3-valued) models are used we obtain thedisjunctive stable semantics or thepartial disjunctive stable semantics, respectively. The proposed semantics are shown to have the following properties:

? For normal programs, the disjunctive (respectively, partial disjunctive) stable semantics coincides with thestable (respectively,partial stable) semantics.

? For normal programs, the partial disjunctive stable semantics also coincides with thewell-founded semantics.

? For locally stratified disjunctive programs both (total and partial) disjunctive stable semantics coincide with theperfect model semantics.

? The partial disjunctive stable semantics can be generalized to the class ofall disjunctive logic programs.

? Both (total and partial) disjunctive stable semantics can be naturally extended to a broader class of disjunctive programs that permit the use ofclassical negation.

? After translation of the programP into a suitable autoepistemic theory \( \hat P \) the disjunctive (respectively, partial disjunctive) stable semantics ofP coincides with the autoepistemic (respectively, 3-valued autoepistemic) semantics of \( \hat P \) .

     

Thinking in parallel: four steps to Parlog

If you are familiar with Prolog but not with Parlog then this tutorial is aimed at you. In what follows I attempt to:

? explain the basics of Parlog

? demonstrate that Parlog programs can be powerful and elegant

? discuss the relationship of Parlog to Prolog, and

? identify some resources which will take you further.

These are what I call ‘four steps to Parlog’.     

In All But Finitely Many Possible Worlds: Model-Theoretic Investigations on ‘<Emphasis Type="Italic">Overwhelming Majority</Emphasis>’ Default Conditionals

Defeasible conditionals are statements of the form ‘if A then normally B’. One plausible interpretation introduced in nonmonotonic reasoning dictates that (\(A\Rightarrow B\)) is true iff B is true in ‘most’ A-worlds. In this paper, we investigate defeasible conditionals constructed upon a notion of ‘overwhelming majority’, defined as ‘truth in a cofinite subset of \(\omega \)’, the first infinite ordinal. One approach employs the modal logic of the frame \((\omega , <)\), used in the temporal logic of discrete linear time. We introduce and investigate conditionals, defined modally over \((\omega , <)\); several modal definitions of the conditional connective are examined, with an emphasis on the nonmonotonic ones. An alternative interpretation of ‘majority’ as sets cofinal (in \(\omega \)) rather than cofinite (subsets of \(\omega \)) is examined. For these modal approaches over \((\omega , <)\), a decision procedure readily emerges, as the modal logic \({\mathbf {K4DLZ}}\) of this frame is well-known and a translation of the conditional sentences can be mechanically checked for validity; this allows also for a quick proof of \(\mathsf {NP}\)-completeness of the satisfiability problem for these logics. A second approach employs the conditional version of Scott-Montague semantics, in the form of \(\omega \)-many possible worlds, endowed with neighborhoods populated by collections of cofinite subsets of \(\omega \). This approach gives rise to weak conditional logics, as expected. The relative strength of the conditionals introduced is compared to (the conditional logic ‘equivalent’ of) KLM logics and other conditional logics in the literature.     

Regular prefix relations

We define a class ofn-ary relations on strings called the regular prefix relations, and give four alternative characterizations of this class:

1. the relations recognized by a new type of automaton, the prefix automata,
2. the relations recognized by tree automata specialized to relations on strings,
3. the relations between strings definable in the second order theory ofk successors,
4. the smallest class containing the regular sets and the prefix relation, and closed under the Boolean operations, Cartesian product, projection, explicit transformation, and concatenation with Cartesian products of regular sets.

We give concrete examples of regular prefix relations, and a pumping argument for prefix automata. An application of these results to the study of inductive inference of regular sets is described.     

Separability and one-way functions

We settle all relativized questions of the relationships between the following five propositions:

• P = NP.
• P = UP.
• P = NP $\cap$ coNP.
• All disjoint pairs of NP sets are P-separable.
• All disjoint pairs of coNP sets are P-separable.

We make the first widespread use of variations of generic oracles to achieve the necessary relativized worlds.     

Ray shooting on triangles in 3-space

We present a uniform approach to problems involving lines in 3-space. This approach is based on mapping lines inR ³ into points and hyperplanes in five-dimensional projective space (Plücker space). We obtain new results on the following problems:

1. Preprocessn triangles so as to answer efficiently the query: “Given a ray, which is the first triangle hit?” (Ray- shooting problem). We discuss the ray-shooting problem for both disjoint and nondisjoint triangles.
2. Construct the intersection of two nonconvex polyhedra in an output sensitive way with asubquadratic overhead term.
3. Construct the arrangement ofn intersecting triangles in 3-space in an output-sensitive way, with asubquadratic overhead term.
4. Efficiently detect the first face hit by any ray in a set of axis-oriented polyhedra.
5. Preprocessn lines (segments) so as to answer efficiently the query “Given two lines, is it possible to move one into the other without crossing any of the initial lines (segments)?” (Isotopy problem). If the movement is possible produce an explicit representation of it.

     

Substring Range Reporting

We revisit various string indexing problems with range reporting features, namely, position-restricted substring searching, indexing substrings with gaps, and indexing substrings with intervals. We obtain the following main results.

• We give efficient reductions for each of the above problems to a new problem, which we call substring range reporting. Hence, we unify the previous work by showing that we may restrict our attention to a single problem rather than studying each of the above problems individually.
• We show how to solve substring range reporting with optimal query time and little space. Combined with our reductions this leads to significantly improved time-space trade-offs for the above problems. In particular, for each problem we obtain the first solutions with optimal time query and O(nlog ^O(1) n) space, where n is the length of the indexed string.
• We show that our techniques for substring range reporting generalize to substring range counting and substring range emptiness variants. We also obtain non-trivial time-space trade-offs for these problems.

Our bounds for substring range reporting are based on a novel combination of suffix trees and range reporting data structures. The reductions are simple and general and may apply to other combinations of string indexing with range reporting.     

On the power of unambiguity in log-space

We report progress on the NL versus UL problem.

We show that counting the number of s-t paths in graphs where the number of s-v paths for any v is bounded by a polynomial can be done in FUL: the unambiguous log-space function class. Several new upper bounds follow from this including ${{{ReachFewL} \subseteq {UL}}}$ and ${{{LFew} \subseteq {UL}^{FewL}}}$

We investigate the complexity of min-uniqueness—a central notion in studying the NL versus UL problem. In this regard we revisit the class OptL[log n] and introduce UOptL[log n], an unambiguous version of OptL[log n]. We investigate the relation between UOptL[log n] and other existing complexity classes.

We consider the unambiguous hierarchies over UL and UOptL[log n]. We show that the hierarchy over UOptL[log n] collapses. This implies that ${{{ULH} \subseteq {L}^{{promiseUL}}}}$ thus collapsing the UL hierarchy.

We show that the reachability problem over graphs embedded on 3 pages is complete for NL. This contrasts with the reachability problem over graphs embedded on 2 pages, which is log-space equivalent to the reachability problem in planar graphs and hence is in UL.

     

On Bounded Rational Trace Languages

In this paper, for a finitely generated monoid M, we tackle the following three questions:

1. Is it possible to give a characterization of rational subsets of M which have polynomial growth?
2. What is the structure of the counting function of rational sets which have polynomial growth?
3. Is it true that every rational subset of M has either exponential growth or it has polynomial growth? Can one decide for a given rational set which of the two options holds?

We give a positive answer to all the previous questions in the case that M is a direct product of free monoids. Some of the proved results also extend to trace monoid.     

The addition of bounded quantification and partial functions to a computational logic and its theorem prover

We describe an extension to our quantifier-free computational logic to provide the expressive power and convenience of bounded quantifiers and partial functions. By quantifier we mean a formal construct which introduces a bound or indicial variable whose scope is some subexpression of the quantifier expression. A familiar quantifier is the Σ operator which sums the values of an expression over some range of values on the bound variable. Our method is to represent expressions of the logic as objects in the logic, to define an interpreter for such expressions as a function in the logic, and then define quantifiers as ‘mapping functions’. The novelty of our approach lies in the formalization of the interpreter and its interaction with the underlying logic. Our method has several advantages over other formal systems that provide quantifiers and partial functions in a logical setting. The most important advantage is that proofs not involving quantification or partial recursive functions are not complicated by such notions as ‘capturing’, ‘bottom’, or ‘continuity’. Naturally enough, our formalization of the partial functions is nonconstructive. The theorem prover for the logic has been modified to support these new features. We describe the modifications. The system has proved many theorems that could not previously be stated in our logic. Among them are:

? classic quantifier manipulation theorems, such as $$\sum\limits_{{\text{l}} = 0}^{\text{n}} {{\text{g}}({\text{l}}) + {\text{h(l) = }}} \sum\limits_{{\text{l = }}0}^{\text{n}} {{\text{g}}({\text{l}})} + \sum\limits_{{\text{l = }}0}^{\text{n}} {{\text{h(l)}};} $$

? elementary theorems involving quantifiers, such as the Binomial Theorem: $$(a + b)^{\text{n}} = \sum\limits_{{\text{l = }}0}^{\text{n}} {\left( {_{\text{i}}^{\text{n}} } \right)} \user2{ }{\text{a}}^{\text{l}} {\text{b}}^{{\text{n - l}}} ;$$

? elementary theorems about ‘mapping functions’ such as: $$(FOLDR\user2{ }'PLUS\user2{ O L) = }\sum\limits_{{\text{i}} \in {\text{L}}}^{} {{\text{i}};} $$

? termination properties of many partial recursive functions such as the fact that an application of the partial function described by $$\begin{gathered} (LEN X) \hfill \\ \Leftarrow \hfill \\ ({\rm I}F ({\rm E}QUAL X NIL) \hfill \\ {\rm O} \hfill \\ (ADD1 (LEN (CDR X)))) \hfill \\ \end{gathered} $$ terminates if and only if the argument ends in NIL;

? theorems about functions satisfying unusual recurrence equations such as the 91-function and the following list reverse function: $$\begin{gathered} (RV X) \hfill \\ \Leftarrow \hfill \\ ({\rm I}F (AND (LISTP X) (LISTP (CDR X))) \hfill \\ (CONS (CAR (RV (CDR X))) \hfill \\ (RV (CONS (CAR X) \hfill \\ (RV (CDR (RV (CDR X))))))) \hfill \\ X). \hfill \\ \end{gathered} $$

     

Konsultative Assistenzsysteme für e-Government

Consultative Assistance Systems (CASS) enhance today’s transaction-oriented applications by case-driven, rule-based and interactive components geared towards individual needs of the end-user.

1. CASS supports in the resolution process with rare cases, which are typically complex in nature.
2. CASS guides the end-user in finding a solution that covers all legal and economical aspects of each case.
3. The example described in this article represents a CASS which supports the complex process of public procurement under the tendering by-laws. The application architecture used in this example can be transferred to many eGovernment scenarios.

     

Trial and error

A pac-learning algorithm isd-space bounded, if it stores at mostd examples from the sample at any time. We characterize thed-space learnable concept classes. For this purpose we introduce the compression parameter of a concept classb and design our Trial and Error Learning Algorithm. We show: b isd-space learnable if and only if the compression parameter ofb is at mostd. This learning algorithm does not produce a hypothesis consistent with the whole sample as previous approaches e.g. by Floyd, who presents consistent space bounded learning algorithms, but has to restrict herself to very special concept classes. On the other hand our algorithm needs large samples; the compression parameter appears as exponent in the sample size. We present several examples of polynomial time space bounded learnable concept classes:

- all intersection closed concept classes with finite VC-dimension.

- convexn-gons in ?².

- halfspaces in ?ⁿ.

- unions of triangles in ?².

We further relate the compression parameter to the VC-dimension, and discuss variants of this parameter.     

Some computational problems in linear algebra as hard as matrix multiplication

We define the complexity of a computational problem given by a relation using the model of computation trees together with the Ostrowski complexity measure. Natural examples from linear algebra are:

KER _n : Compute a basis of the kernel for a givenn×n-matrix,

OGB _n : Find an invertible matrix that transforms a given symmetricn×n-matrix (quadratic form) into diagonal form,

SPR _n : Find a sparse representation of a givenn×n-matrix.

     

Towards a logic programming methodology based on higher-order predicates

This paper outlines a logic programming methodology which applies standardized logic program recursion forms afforded by a system of general purpose recursion schemes. The recursion schemes are conceived of as quasi higher-order predicates which accept predicate arguments, thereby representing parameterized program modules. This use of higher-order predicates is analogous to higher-order functionals in functional programming. However, these quasi higher-order predicates are handled by a metalogic programming technique within ordinary logic programming. Some of the proposed recursion operators are actualizations of mathematical induction principles (e.g. structural induction as generalization of primitive recursion). Others are heuristic schemes for commonly occurring recursive program forms. The intention is to handle all recursions in logic programs through the given repertoire of higher-order predicates. We carry out a pragmatic feasibility study of the proposed recursion operators with respect to the corpus of common textbook logic programs. This pragmatic investigation is accompanied with an analysis of the theoretical expressivity. The main theoretical results concerning computability are

1. Primitive recursive functions can be re-expressed in logic programming by predicates defined solely by non-recursive clauses augmented with afold recursion predicate akin to the fold operators in functional programming.
2. General recursive functions can be re-expressed likewise sincefold allows re-expression of alinrec recursion predicate facilitating linear, unbounded recursion.

     

Word-Mappings of Level 2

A sequence of natural numbers is said to have level k, for some natural integer k, if it can be computed by a deterministic pushdown automaton of level k (Fratani and Sénizergues in Ann Pure Appl. Log. 141:363–411, 2006). We show here that the sequences of level 2 are exactly the rational formal power series over one undeterminate. More generally, we study mappings from words to words and show that the following classes coincide:

the mappings which are computable by deterministic pushdown automata of level 2

the mappings which are solution of a system of catenative recurrence equations

the mappings which are definable as a Lindenmayer system of type HDT0L.

We illustrate the usefulness of this characterization by proving three statements about formal power series, rational sets of homomorphisms and equations in words.     

Bisection forAx=λBx with matrices of variable band width

Some extensions of the bisection method and of the inverse vector iteration for the general eigenvalue problemAx=λBx with symmetric matrices are given. A version with restricted pivoting is applied to sparse matricesA andB in which case the decomposition ofA-μB can be performed within an extended envelope with respect to the envelopeA andB. The effect of these refinements is illustrated by an example.     

Kernel language KLND

This paper presents a kernel language KLND on the basis of analysing the kernel languagerequirements of new generation computer systems. These requirements are: the ability ofknow-ledge processing, the parallelism, the elegant mathematical properties of the comput-ation model which is appropriate for working as the basis of the novel architecture design, andthe suitability for writing large scale softwares. The main features of KLND are as follows: 1. several new language concepts. 2. the modularity, 3. the unification of logical and functional programming styles, 4. the exploitation of the parallelism. 5. the introduction of the type concept, 6. the introduction of the storage concept.     

A general theory of translation

The concept of a translation is fundamental to any theory of compiling. Formally, atranslation is any set of pairs of words. Classes of finitely describable translations are considered in general, from the point of view of balloon automata [17, 18, 19]. A translation can be defined by atransducer, a device with an input tape and an output terminal. If, with inputx, the stringy appears at the output terminal, then (x, y) is in the translation defined by the transducer. One can also define a translation by a two input taperecognizer. Ifx andy are placed on the two tapes, the recognizer tells if (x, y) is in the defined translation. One can define closed classes of transducers and recognizers by:

1. restricting the way in which infinite storage may be used (pushdown structure, stack structure, etc.),
2. allowing the finite control to be nondeterministic or deterministic,
3. allowing one way or two way motion on the input tapes.

We have some results on classes of translations which can be categorized roughly into three types.

1. Translations defined by certain classes of transducers and recognizers are equivalent.
2. Translations of a given class are sometimes closed under composition and decomposition with a finite memory translation (gsm mapping).
3. A nondeterministically defined translation can be expressed as the composition of a finitely defined translation and a related deterministically defined translation in many cases.

In addition, ifC is a class of translations, then one can write a compiler-compiler to render any translationT inC and only if the following question is solvable: For any translationT inC and stringx, does there exist ay such that (x, y) is inT? We shall show that, in general, the decidability of this question is equivalent to the decidability of one or more questions from automata theory, depending upon the type of devices defining the classC.     

Zur semantischen Interoperabilität in der Energiebranche: CIM IEC 61970

This contribution provides an introduction to the Common Information Model CIM which is an international standard maintained by the International Electrotechnical Commission IEC. Today’s market requirements towards the model are discussed, furthermore, we give an introduction to the history of the CIM, its serializations and scope of application. The contribution concludes with an overview of future use of the CIM for both science and commerce. Briefly, we focus on:

Message-based loose coupling of information systems

Exchange of power grid topologies with minimal communication and data overhead

Data quality assurance using ontology-based meta annotations and

Integration of heterogeneous standards in the utility domain. The contribution presents solutions to the use cases providing a better information management for the utility utilizing the Common Information Model.