共查询到18条相似文献,搜索用时 156 毫秒
1.
代理移动IPv6为移动节点提供了基于网络的移动性管理方法,移动节点不参与管理移动性信令.为了在移动互联网络中应用代理移动IPv6协议,需要定义安全有效的认证协议.目前还没有见到关于代理移动IPv6认证协议方面的研究,本文提出了一种代理移动IPv6的认证协议,该认证协议可以提供接入认证功能,并可防止重放攻击和密钥暴露.为了分析该认证协议的性能,本文给出了认证费用和认证延迟分析的解析模型,分析了移动性和流量参数对认证费用和认证延迟的影响.研究结果表明提出的代理移动IPv6认证协议安全有效. 相似文献
2.
移动IPv6通过移动节点(MN)家乡地址绑定注册实现对移动性的支持,MN向家乡代理的注册必须提供家乡地址、家乡代理地址和家乡代理安全关联,移动IPv6基本协议假设以上信息总是存在于MN之上,并未考虑实际部署中的复杂情况。文中重点分析了该问题,把MN动态获得家乡代理注册信息的过程定义为Bootstrapping,考虑了MN在不同网络部署情况下的Bootstrapping,给出了一种可能的解决思路。 相似文献
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
杨明 《无线电技术与信息》2007,(2):65-69
随着数据应用的发展速度越来越快,IPv4协议逐渐暴露出了诸多弊端。具体表现为地址数量太少,路由表迅速膨胀,配置过于复杂,缺乏安全性保障,QoS和性能保障不足,对移动性支持不够等。因此,IPv4基本已经不能再满足人们对数据应用的需求。IPv6的出现给数据应用带来了曙光,同时,也为IPv4所暴露出来的各种弊端提供了良好的解决方案。尤其是其地址数量几乎无限,使得移动终端海量的地址需求得以满足,并且其移动性也比IPv4增强了许多。 相似文献
8.
移动IPv6被认为是实现固定和移动网络结合的关键技术,它可以实现固定和移动网络的无缝连接。在移动网络中,要求数据能被快速移交,但是这个核心功能在早期的移动IPv6的版本不能得到支持。这是由于移动节点的移动性能的管理受制于家乡代理和通信伙伴节点,而且后两者往往远离移动节点。为了克服这个问题,IETF提出了分级处理的办法,但这些方法是牺牲路由优化来获取数据的快速移交。本文提出一种新的基于分级处理的移动管理结构,它可以实现在不牺牲路由的前提下,加快数据信息的快速移交。 相似文献
9.
10.
移动IPv6安全问题分析 总被引:5,自引:0,他引:5
移动IPv6协议作为下一代互联网解决移动通信的基本理论,为解决“三角路由”问题和更好的支持节点移动,定义了一些控制信令和新的移动扩展头,但同时也带来了新的安全威胁,为此提出了一些安全策略来保护控制信令。本文探讨了移动IPv6协议主要面临的安全威胁,分析了通过IPSec安全联盟来保护移动节点和家乡代理之间的控制信令以及RR协议来保护移动节点和通信节点之间的控制信令的安全策略。 相似文献
11.
Huachun Zhou Hongke Zhang Yajuan Qin Hwang-Cheng Wang Han-Chieh Chao 《Mobile Networks and Applications》2010,15(4):530-542
This paper specifies a global mobility management architecture and protocol procedure called GPMIP, which is based on Proxy Mobile IPv6. In GPMIP, mobility management is performed by the network entity rather than individual mobile nodes. The benefit is the elimination of the wireless link data delivery tunnel overhead between a mobile node and the access router. To compare with the well known Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 mobility management protocol, the location update, packet delivery, and total cost functions generated by a mobile node during its average domain residence time are formulated for each protocol based on fluid flow mobility model. Then, the impacts of various system parameters on the cost functions are analyzed. The analytical results indicate that the proposed global mobility management protocol can guarantee lower total costs. Furthermore, a qualitative comparison between GPMIP and some other global management protocols is also investigated. 相似文献
12.
13.
Seung‐Hee Hwang Bo‐Kyung Lee Youn‐Hee Han Chong‐Sun Hwang 《Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing》2004,4(2):233-245
The Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 (HMIPv6), which is based on the Mobile IPv6 (MIPv6), has been proposed by IETF to reduce registration control signaling. It separates micro‐mobility from macro‐mobility with the help of an intermediate mobility agent, called the mobility anchor point (MAP), and exploits a Mobile Node's (MN's) spatial locality. However, all packets from a Correspondent Node (CN) to an MN are delivered through the MAP. That causes delay in packets delivery and the congestion of packets in the MAP so that it results in deterioration of network capability. To alleviate these problems, we propose a Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 protocol using not only spatial locality but also temporal locality. We introduce a profile for management of these locality information. According to the information in the profile, some packets are directly delivered to an MN, if MN seems to reside for a long time in the current subnet. Also, we introduce a handover scheme with the help of an L2 trigger, so that the proposed scheme takes nearly the same handover delay time as HMIPv6. The other contribution of this paper is to suggest a mathematical modeling and analysis of network traffic costs, MAP processing costs and handover latency for both HMIPv6 and the proposed scheme. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 相似文献
14.
SONG Mei FENG Rui-jun HUANG Jian-wen SONG Jun-dePCN CAD Center School of Electronic Engineering Beijing University of Posts Telecommunications Beijing China 《中国邮电高校学报(英文版)》2006,13(3):38-42
1 Introduction Mobility management is a key technical aspect in mobile communication systems. The main purpose of mobility management is to enable mobile terminals or users to communicate with each other continuously while moving—— while minimizing data… 相似文献
15.
Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) is designed to provide a network-based localized mobility management protocol, but it does not handle the global mobility of hosts. In this paper, we propose a location management scheme based on Domain Name System (DNS) for PMIPv6 which can support global mobility by using DNS as a location manager. In addition, to support large numbers of mobile terminals and enhance network scalability a paging extension scheme is introduced to PMIPv6.To evaluate the proposed location management scheme, we establish an analytical model, formulate the location update cost and the paging cost,and analyze the influence of the different factors on the total signaling cost. The performance results show that our proposed scheme outperforms the basic PMIPv6 under various parameters in terms of reducing the signaling overhead and the proposed scheme reduces signaling overhead compared to the basic PMIPv6. 相似文献
16.
通过分析分层移动IPv6协议,提出一种基于分层机制的优化移动IPv6路由管理策略。该策略支持路由优化,能在域内、域间移动时实现快速切换以减少时延,提高网络资源利用率。 相似文献
17.
Mobile IPv6 (MIPv6) is a work in progress IETF standard for enabling mobility in IPv6 networks and is expected to have wide
deployment. We investigate an integrated mobility and service management scheme based on MIPv6 with the goal to minimize the
overall network signaling cost in MIPv6 systems for serving mobility and service management related operations. Our design
extends IETF work-in-progress Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 (HMIPv6) with the notion of dynamic mobility anchor points (DMAPs)
for each mobile node (MN) instead of static ones for all MNs. These DMAPs are access routers chosen by individual MNs to act
as a regional router to reduce the signaling overhead for intra-regional movements. The DMAP domain size, i.e., the number
of subnets covered by a DMAP, is based on the MN’s mobility and service characteristics. Under our DMAP protocol, a MN interacts
with its home agent and application servers as in the MIPv6 protocol, but optimally determines when and where to launch a
DMAP to minimize the network cost in serving the user’s mobility and service management operations. We demonstrate that our
DMAP protocol for integrated mobility and service management yields significantly improved performance over basic MIPv6 and
HMIPv6. 相似文献
18.
Yuh‐Shyan Chen Wei‐Han Hsiao Kau‐Lin Chiu 《International Journal of Communication Systems》2009,22(12):1515-1541
In wireless/mobile networks, users freely and frequently change their access points (APs) while they are communicating with other users. To support the mobility of mobile nodes (MNs), Mobile IPv6 (MIPv6) is used to inform the information of MN's home address and current care‐of‐address (CoA) to its home agent. MIPv6 suffers from a long delay latency and high packet losses (PLs) because MIPv6 does not support micromobility. A Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 (HMIPv6) is proposed which provides micromobility and macromobility to reduce handoff latency (HL) by employing a hierarchical network structure. In this paper, we propose a cross‐layer partner‐based fast handoff mechanism based on HMIPv6, called the PHMIPv6 protocol. Our PHMIPv6 protocol is a cross‐layer, layer‐2 + layer‐3, and cooperative approach. A cooperative node, called a partner node (PN), is adopted in the PHMIPv6 protocol. A new layer‐2 trigger scheme used in the PHMIPv6 protocol accurately predicts the next AP and then invites a cooperative PN in the area of the next AP. With the cooperation of the PN, the CoA can be pre‐acquired and duplicate address detection operation can be pre‐executed by the PN before the MN initializes the handoff request. The PHMIPv6 protocol significantly reduces the handoff delay time and PLs. In the mathematical analysis, we verified that our PHMIPv6 protocol offers a better HL than the MIPv6, HMIPv6, and SHMIPv6 protocols. Finally, the experimental results also illustrate that the PHMIPv6 protocol actually achieves performance improvements in the handoff delay time, PL rate, and handoff delay jitter. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 相似文献