Cross efficiency evaluation method based on weight-balanced data envelopment analysis model

In this paper, the cross efficiency evaluation method, regarded as a DEA extension tool, is firstly reviewed for its utilization in identifying the Decision Making Unit (DMU) with the best practice and ranking the DMUs by their respective cross-efficiency scores. However, we then point out that the main drawback of the method lies in non-uniqueness of cross-efficiency scores resulted from the presence of alternate optima in traditional DEA models, obviously making it become less effective. Aiming at the research gap, a weight-balanced DEA model is proposed to lessen large differences in weighted data (weighted inputs and weighted outputs) and to effectively reduce the number of zero weights for inputs and outputs. Finally, we use two examples of the literature to illustrate the performance of this approach and discuss some issues of interest regarding the choosing of weights in cross-efficiency evaluations.     

基于模糊期望值的模糊DEA 交叉效率评价方法

基于模糊DEA的交叉效率评价方法研究是一个崭新的研究课题,有着广阔的应用前景。结合基于模糊期望值的模糊 DEA 模型和交叉效率原理,提出一种新的交叉效率的评价方法。该方法首先求出基于模糊期望值的最优效率值权重,然后由这组模糊最优权重求解他评效率并构造交叉效率矩阵,最后根据求出的模糊期望交叉效率值对各DMU进行排序。     

A hybrid data envelopment analysis and multi-attribute decision making approach to sustainability assessment

The concept of sustainability consists of three main dimensions: environmental, techno-economic, and social. Measuring the sustainability status of a system or technology is a significant challenge, especially when it needs to consider a large number of attributes in each dimension of sustainability. In this study, we first propose a hybrid approach, involving data envelopment analysis (DEA) and a multi-attribute decision making (MADM) methodologies, for computing an index for each dimension of sustainability, and then we define the overall sustainability index as the mean of the three measured indexes. Towards this end, we define new concepts of efficiency and cross-efficiency of order (p, q) where p and q are the number of inputs and outputs, respectively. For a given (p, q) , we address the problem of finding efficiency of order (p, q) by developing a novel DEA-based selecting method. Finally, we define the sustainability index as a weighted sum of all possible cross-efficiencies of order (p, q) . Form a computational viewpoint, the proposed selecting model significantly decreases the computational burden in comparison with the successive solving of traditional DEA models. A case study of the electricity-generation technologies in the United Kingdom is taken as a real-world example to illustrate the potential application of our method.     

Analysis of the environmental efficiency in China based on the DEA cross-efficiency approach under different policy objectives

The existing studies on environmental efficiency evaluation generally have the problem of efficiency overestimation. To solve this problem, a new data envelopment analysis (DEA) cross-efficiency approach with undesirable outputs is developed to evaluate environmental efficiency from the perspectives of both self-evaluation and peer evaluation. Then, three new evaluation strategies, namely, economic development strategy, environmental protection strategy, and win–win strategy, are proposed to reflect the needs of decision makers under different policy objectives. The proposed cross-efficiency approach with different evaluation strategies not only realizes the cross evaluation of environmental efficiency, but also guarantees the relative uniqueness of the optimal solution on the basis of the preferences of decision makers. Combining the metafrontier DEA approach and DEA window analysis, a new cross-efficiency analytical framework is constructed to gradually analyse the influences of policy objectives, technology heterogeneity, and dynamic correlation on the environmental efficiency. Subsequently, the environmental efficiency of China's economic development during 2006–2015 is in-depth analysed on the basis of the proposed analytical framework, and some interesting conclusions, and some useful suggestions are obtained.     

A generalized multiple layer data envelopment analysis model for hierarchical structure assessment: A case study in road safety performance evaluation

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a powerful analytical research tool for measuring the relative efficiency of a homogeneous set of decision making units (DMUs) by obtaining empirical estimates of relations between multiple inputs and multiple outputs related to the DMUs. To further embody multilayer hierarchical structures of these inputs and outputs in the DEA framework, which are prevalent in today’s performance evaluation activities, we propose a generalized multiple layer DEA (MLDEA) model. Starting from the input-oriented CCR model, we elaborate the mathematical deduction process of the MLDEA model, formulate the weights in each layer of the hierarchy, and indicate different types of possible weight restrictions. Meanwhile, its linear transformation is realized and further extended to the BCC form. To demonstrate the proposed MLDEA model, a case study in evaluating the road safety performance of a set of 19 European countries is carried out. By using 13 hierarchical safety performance indicators in terms of road user behavior (e.g., inappropriate or excessive speed) as the model’s input and 4 layered road safety final outcomes (e.g., road fatalities) as the output, we compute the most optimal road safety efficiency score for the set of European countries, and further analyze the weights assigned to each layer of the hierarchy. A comparison of the results with the ones from the one layer DEA model clearly indicates the usefulness and effectiveness of this improvement in dealing with a great number of performance evaluation activities with hierarchical structures.     

Assessing the efficiency of supply chain scheduling algorithms using data envelopment analysis

Where different supply chain planning algorithms are used, generally similar results may pose some challenges on the differentiating powers of evaluating different production schedules because of the increasing complexity of a supply chain network structure. For the comparison purpose, performance evaluation of different supply chain planning algorithms aims to use different supply chains models with different demands, capacities, and commonality through efficiency perspective by using a modified network rational data envelopment analysis (DEA) model. The proposed DEA model has the abilities: (1) to treat only undesirable outputs that exist without normal output, and the situation where input and output are both zero by introducing two new parameters to denote the maximum inventory and amount of delayed demands of a given node in a given time period; and (2) to evaluate the effect of the undesirable outputs/inputs on efficiency with assumption that they leave the system at the end of the current time period and re-enter the system at the beginning of the next time period. To prove the effectiveness of this DEA model, eighteen scenarios with different demands, capacities, and multiple periods are compared. In addition, this study tests the DEA model on a wafer testing/probing operation of a leading global semiconductor manufacturing and testing company in Taiwan by internal supply chain perspective. Results show that the DEA model proposed in this study can be used to assess the efficiency of a real-world operation with undesirable outputs/inputs, such as inventory and delayed demands.     

A new network epsilon-based DEA model for supply chain performance evaluation

Supply chain performance evaluation problems are inherently complex problems with multilayered internal linking activities and multiple entities. Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) has been used to evaluate the relative performance of organizational units called Decision Making Units (DMUs). However, the conventional DEA models cannot take into consideration the complex nature of supply chains with internal linking activities. Network DEA models using radial measures of efficiency are used for supply chain performance evaluation problems. However, these models are not suitable for problems where radial and non-radial inputs and outputs must be considered simultaneously. DEA models using Epsilon-Based Measures (EBMs) of efficiency are proposed for a simultaneous consideration of radial and non-radial inputs and outputs. We extend the EBM model and propose a new Network EBM (NEBM) model. The proposed NEBM model combines the radial and non-radial measures of efficiency into a unified framework for solving network DEA problems. A case study is presented to exhibit the efficacy of the procedures and to demonstrate the applicability of the proposed method to a supply chain performance evaluation problem in the semiconductor industry.     

New analytical hierarchical process/data envelopment analysis methodology for ranking decision‐making units

The analytical hierarchical process/data envelopment analysis (AHP/DEA) methodology for ranking decision‐making units (DMUs) has some problems: it illogically compares two DMUs in a DEA model; it is not compatible with DEA ranking in the case of multiple inputs/multiple outputs; and it leads to weak discrimination in cases where the number of inputs and outputs is large. In this paper, we propose a new two‐stage AHP/DEA methodology for ranking DMUs that removes these problems. In the first stage, we create a pairwise comparison matrix different from AHP/DEA methodology; the second stage is the same as AHP/DEA methodology. Numerical examples are presented in the paper to illustrate the advantages of the new AHP/DEA methodology.     

A fuzzy DEA model with undesirable fuzzy outputs and its application to the banking sector in India

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a widely used technique for measuring the relative efficiencies of decision making units (DMUs) with multiple inputs and multiple outputs. However, in real life applications, undesirable outputs may be present in the production process which needs to be minimized. The present study endeavors to propose a DEA model with undesirable outputs and further to extend it in fuzzy environment in view of the fact that input/output data are not always available in exact form in real life problems. We propose a fuzzy DEA model with undesirable fuzzy outputs which can be solved as crisp linear program for each α in (0, 1] using α-cut approach. Further, cross-efficiency technique is applied to increase the discrimination power of the proposed models and to rank the efficient DMUs at every α in (0, 1]. Moreover, for better understanding of the proposed methodology, we present a numerical illustration followed by an application to the banking sector in India. This is the first study which attempts to measure the performance of public sector banks (PuSBs) in India using fuzzy input/output data for the period 2009–2011. The results obtained from the proposed methodology not only depict the impact of undesirable output on the performance of PuSBs but also analyze efficiently the influence of the presence of uncertainty in the data over the efficiency results. The findings show that the efficiency results of many PuSBs vary with the variation in α during the selected period.     

Expansion of the cross-efficiency evaluation by using the equations forming the efficient frontier in DEA

In this paper, we propose an algorithm to calculate cross-efficiency scores which used the equations forming the efficient frontier in data envelopment analysis (DEA). In many standard DEA models, each decision-making unit (DMU) is evaluated by using the advantageous weight for itself. Then, many DMUs are evaluated as efficient, and those efficient DMUs are not ranked by the models. The cross-efficiency evaluation is a method to rank DMUs by using the advantageous weights for all DMUs. Previously, the cross-efficiency scores based on different ideas are calculated by solving multiple linear or nonlinear programming problems. However, it is often hard to solve such a nonlinear programming problem. Therefore, by analysing the efficient frontier, we construct an algorithm to calculate alternative cross-efficiency scores.     

Common weights data envelopment analysis with uncertain data: A robust optimization approach

One of the primary issues on data envelopment analysis (DEA) models is the reduction of weights flexibility. There are literally several studies to determine common weights in DEA but none of them considers uncertainty in data. This paper introduces a robust optimization approach to find common weights in DEA with uncertain data. The uncertainty is considered in both inputs and outputs and a suitable robust counterpart of DEA model is developed. The proposed robust DEA model is solved and the ideal solution is found for each decision making units (DMUs). Then, the common weights are found for all DMUs by utilizing the goal programming technique. To illustrate the performance of the proposed model, a numerical example is solved. Also, the proposed model of this paper is implemented by using some actual data from provincial gas companies in Iran.     

Intermodal terminal planning by Petri Nets and Data Envelopment Analysis

A procedure for planning and resources’ management in intermodal terminals is presented. It integrates Timed Petri Nets (TPNs) and Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and consists of three steps: the terminal modeling via TPNs to model the regular behavior; the evaluation of whether the current configuration may cope with increased freight flows; if not, the analysis by cross-efficiency DEA of alternative planning solutions. The procedure provides the decision maker with number, capacity, and schedule of resources to tackle the flows increase. The method is evaluated by a real case study, showing that integrating TPNs and DEA allows taking planning decisions under conflicting requirements.     

Sensitivity analysis of the additive model in data envelopment analysis while inputs and outputs are fuzzy data

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) requires input and output data to be precisely known. This is not always the case in real applications. Sensitivity analysis of the additive model in DEA is studied in this paper while inputs and outputs are symmetric triangular fuzzy numbers. Sufficient conditions for simultaneous change of all outputs and inputs of an efficient decision-making unit (DMU) which preserves efficiency are established. Two kinds of changes on inputs and outputs are considered. For the first state, changes are exerted on the core and margin of symmetric triangular fuzzy numbers so that the value of inputs increase and the value of outputs decrease. In the second state, a non-negative symmetric triangular fuzzy number is subtracted from outputs to decrease outputs and it is added to inputs to increase inputs. A numerical illustration is provided.     

基于DEA交叉评价的模糊综合评价模型及其应用

借鉴数据包络分析(DEA)交叉评价的思想,首先将评价系统内的指标分为量化指标和非量化指标,在定义平均交叉效率、最小交叉效率和最大交叉效率概念的基础上,采用交叉评价方法对量化数据进行处理;然后对最小交叉效率值、平均交叉效率值和最大交叉效率值进行模糊化,模糊化之后将其作为模糊综合评价的指标与非量化指标一起进行二次评价,以建立基于DEA交叉评价的模糊综合评价模型;最后通过评价实例验证了所提出的模型在处理客观数据与主观因素并存的多属性决策中的客观性和全面性.     

An AHP/DEA methodology for ranking decision making units

This paper presents a two-stage model for fully ranking organizational units where each unit has multiple inputs and outputs. In the first stage, the Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is run for each pair of units separately. In the second stage, the pairwise evaluation matrix generated in the first stage is utilized to rank scale the units via the Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP). The consistency of this AHP/DEA evaluation can be tested statistically. Its goodness of fit with the DEA classification (to efficient/inefficient) can also be tested using non-parametric tests. Both DEA and AHP are commonly used in practice. Both have limitations. The hybrid model AHP/DEA takes the best of both models, by avoiding the pitfalls of each. The nonaxiomatic utility theory limitations of AHP are irrelevant here: since we are working with given inputs and outputs of units, no subjective assessment of a decision maker evaluation is involved. AHP/DEA ranking does not replace the DEA classification model, rather it furthers the analysis by providing full ranking in the DEA context for all units, efficient and inefficient.     

Additive centralized and Stackelberg DEA models for two‐stage system with shared resources

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a nonparametric programming method for evaluating the efficiency performance of decision making units (DMUs) with multiple inputs and outputs. The classic DEA model cannot provide accurate efficiency measurement and inefficiency sources of DMUs with complex internal structure. The network DEA approach opens the “black box” of DMU by taking its internal operations into consideration. The complexities of DMU's internal structure involve not only the organization of substages, but also the inputs allocation and the operational relations among the individual stages. This paper proposes a set of additive DEA models to evaluate and decompose the efficiency of a two‐stage system with shared inputs and operating in cooperative and Stackelberg game situations. Under the assumptions of cooperative and noncooperative gaming, the proposed models are able to highlight the effects of strategic elements on the efficiency formation of DMUs by calculating the optimal proportion of the shared inputs allocated to each stage. The case of information technology in the banking industry at the firm level, as discussed by Wang, is revisited using the developed DEA approach.     

Evaluating the efficiency of a two-stage production process using data envelopment analysis

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) has been widely used to evaluate the comparative efficiencies of production processes. Most of the DEA applications assume that production processes consist of one stage. However, many production processes such as IT investments have more than one stage. In a two‐stage production process, the first stage inputs produce intermediate outputs, which are used as inputs to the second stage to produce the final outputs. In such cases, using single‐stage DEA may result in inaccurate efficiency evaluation. To address such problems, DEA models assuming two‐stage production processes have been developed. In this paper, we extend two‐stage DEA models by considering input and output slacks. We apply our model to the data from the banking industry and compare the results with those of the previous two‐stage DEA models. Our model can identify weakly efficient units of evaluation that could not be identified by the previous models.     

Measurement of overall performances of decision-making units using ideal and anti-ideal decision-making units

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a method for evaluating relative efficiencies of decision-making units (DMUs) which perform similar functions in a production system, consuming multiple inputs to produce multiple outputs. The conventional form of DEA evaluates performances of DMUs only from the optimistic point of view. In other words, it chooses the most favorable weights for each DMU. There is another approach that measures efficiency of a DMU from the pessimistic point of view. This approach chooses the most unfavorable weights for evaluation of each DMU. In this paper, we propose to integrate both efficiencies in the form of an interval in order to measure the overall performance of a DMU. The proposed DEA models for evaluation of efficiencies are called bounded DEA models. The proposed approach will be compared using a numerical example. Another example regarding performance evaluation of 50 bank branches in Iranian cities will be presented to demonstrate the advantages, simplicity, and utility of this approach in real-life situations.     

Modeling fuzzy data envelopment analysis by parametric programming method

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a methodology for measuring the relative efficiency of decision making units (DMUs) consuming the same types of inputs and producing the same types of outputs. This paper studies the DEA models with type-2 data variations. In order to deal with the existed type-2 fuzziness, we propose the mean reduction methods for type-2 fuzzy variables. Based on the mean reductions of the type-2 fuzzy inputs and outputs, we formulate a new class of fuzzy generalized expectation DEA models. When the inputs and outputs are mutually independent type-2 triangular fuzzy variables, we discuss the equivalent parametric forms for the constraints and the generalized expectation objective, where the parameters characterize the degree of uncertainty of the type-2 fuzzy coefficients so that the information cannot be lost via our reduction method. For any given parameters, the proposed model becomes nonlinear programming, which can be solved by standard optimization solvers. To illustrate the modeling idea and the efficiency of the proposed DEA model, we provide one numerical example.     

Allocating fixed resources and setting targets using a common-weights DEA approach

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a data-driven non-parametric approach for measuring the efficiency of a set of decision making units (DMUs) using multiple inputs to generate multiple outputs. Conventionally, DEA is used in ex post evaluation of actual performance, estimating an empirical best-practice frontier using minimal assumptions about the shape of the production space. However, DEA may also be used prospectively or normatively to allocate resources, costs and revenues in a given organization. Such approaches have theoretical foundations in economic theory and provide a consistent integration of the endowment-evaluation-incentive cycle in organizational management. The normative use, e.g. allocation of resources or target setting, in DEA can be based on different principles, ranging from maximization of the joint profit (score), combinations of individual scores or game-theoretical settings. In this paper, we propose an allocation mechanism that is based on a common dual weights approach. Compared to alternative approaches, our model can be interpreted as providing equal endogenous valuations of the inputs and outputs in the reference set. Given that a normative use implicitly assumes that there exists a centralized decision-maker in the organization evaluated, we claim that this approach assures a consistent and equitable internal allocation. Two numerical examples are presented to illustrate the applicability of the proposed method and to contrast it with earlier work.