Synthesis and application of the first radioligand targeting the allosteric binding pocket of chemokine receptor CXCR3

Strategies for the identification of allosteric modulators of chemokine receptors largely rely on various cell‐based functional assays. Radioligand binding assays are typically not available for allosteric binding sites. We synthesized, purified, and applied the first tritium‐labeled allosteric modulator of the human chemokine receptor CXCR3 (RAMX3, [³H]N‐{1‐[3‐(4‐ethoxyphenyl)‐4‐oxo‐3,4‐dihydropyrido[2,3‐d]pyrimidin‐2‐yl]ethyl}‐2‐[4‐fluoro‐3‐(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]‐N‐[(1‐methylpiperidin‐4‐yl)methyl]acetamide). RAMX3 is chemically derived from 8‐azaquinazolinone‐type allosteric modulators and binds to the CXCR3 receptor with a K_d value of 1.08 nM (specific activity: 80.4 Ci mmol^?1). Radioligand displacement assays showed potent negative cooperativity between RAMX3 and chemokine CXCL11, providing a basis for the use of RAMX3 to investigate other potential allosteric modulators. Additionally, the synthesis and characterization of a number of other full and truncated 8‐azaquinazoline analogues were used to validate the binding properties of RAMX3. We demonstrate that RAMX3 can be efficiently used to facilitate the discovery and characterization of small molecules as allosteric modulators of the CXCR3 receptor.     

The Effect of Hypoxia on the Expression of CXC Chemokines and CXC Chemokine Receptors—A Review of Literature

Hypoxia is an integral component of the tumor microenvironment. Either as chronic or cycling hypoxia, it exerts a similar effect on cancer processes by activating hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1) and nuclear factor (NF-κB), with cycling hypoxia showing a stronger proinflammatory influence. One of the systems affected by hypoxia is the CXC chemokine system. This paper reviews all available information on hypoxia-induced changes in the expression of all CXC chemokines (CXCL1, CXCL2, CXCL3, CXCL4, CXCL5, CXCL6, CXCL7, CXCL8 (IL-8), CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL11, CXCL12 (SDF-1), CXCL13, CXCL14, CXCL15, CXCL16, CXCL17) as well as CXC chemokine receptors—CXCR1, CXCR2, CXCR3, CXCR4, CXCR5, CXCR6, CXCR7 and CXCR8. First, we present basic information on the effect of these chemoattractant cytokines on cancer processes. We then discuss the effect of hypoxia-induced changes on CXC chemokine expression on the angiogenesis, lymphangiogenesis and recruitment of various cells to the tumor niche, including myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), tumor-associated neutrophils (TANs), regulatory T cells (T_regs) and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). Finally, the review summarizes data on the use of drugs targeting the CXC chemokine system in cancer therapies.     

CXCL12-CXCR4/CXCR7 Axis in Colorectal Cancer: Therapeutic Target in Preclinical and Clinical Studies

Chemokines are chemotactic cytokines that promote cancer growth, metastasis, and regulate resistance to chemotherapy. Stromal cell-derived factor 1 (SDF1) also known as C-X-C motif chemokine 12 (CXCL12), a prognostic factor, is an extracellular homeostatic chemokine that is the natural ligand for chemokine receptors C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCR4), also known as fusin or cluster of differentiation 184 (CD184) and chemokine receptor type 7 (CXCR7). CXCR4 is the most widely expressed rhodopsin-like G protein coupled chemokine receptor (GPCR). The CXCL12–CXCR4 axis is involved in tumor growth, invasion, angiogenesis, and metastasis in colorectal cancer (CRC). CXCR7, recently termed as atypical chemokine receptor 3 (ACKR3), is amongst the G protein coupled cell surface receptor family that is also commonly expressed in a large variety of cancer cells. CXCR7, like CXCR4, regulates immunity, angiogenesis, stem cell trafficking, cell growth and organ-specific metastases. CXCR4 and CXCR7 are expressed individually or together, depending on the tumor type. When expressed together, CXCR4 and CXCR7 can form homo- or hetero-dimers. Homo- and hetero-dimerization of CXCL12 and its receptors CXCR4 and CXCR7 alter their signaling activity. Only few drugs have been approved for clinical use targeting CXCL12-CXCR4/CXCR7 axis. Several CXCR4 inhibitors are in clinical trials for solid tumor treatment with limited success whereas CXCR7-specific inhibitors are still in preclinical studies for CRC. This review focuses on current knowledge of chemokine CXCL12 and its receptors CXCR4 and CXCR7, with emphasis on targeting the CXCL12–CXCR4/CXCR7 axis as a treatment strategy for CRC.     

Development of Photoactivatable Allosteric Modulators for the Chemokine Receptor CXCR3

The CXCR3 receptor, a class A G protein‐coupled receptor (GPCR), is involved in the regulation and trafficking of various immune cells. CXCR3 antagonists have been proposed to be beneficial for the treatment of a wide range of disorders including but not limited to inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. The structure‐based design of CXCR3 ligands remains, however, hampered by a lack of structural information describing in detail the interactions between an allosteric ligand and the receptor. We designed and synthesized photoactivatable probes for the structural and functional characterization, using photoaffinity labeling followed by mass spectrometry, of the CXCR3 allosteric binding pocket of AMG 487 and RAMX3, two potent and selective CXCR3 negative allosteric modulators. Photoaffinity labeling is a common approach to elucidate binding modes of small‐molecule ligands of GPCRs through the aid of photoactivatable probes that convert to extremely reactive intermediates upon photolysis. The photolabile probe N‐[({1‐[3‐(4‐ethoxyphenyl)‐4‐oxo‐3,4‐dihydropyrido[2,3‐d]pyrimidin‐2‐yl]ethyl}‐2‐[4‐fluoro‐3‐(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]‐N‐{1‐[4‐(3‐(trifluoromethyl)‐3H‐diazirin‐3‐yl]benzyl}piperidin‐4‐yl)methyl]acetamide ( 10 ) showed significant labeling of the CXCR3 receptor (80 %) in a [³H]RAMX3 radioligand displacement assay. Compound 10 will serve as an important tool compound for the detailed investigation of the binding pocket of CXCR3 by mass spectrometry.     

Structure–Activity Relationships of Quinoxaline‐Based 5‐HT3A and 5‐HT3AB Receptor‐Selective Ligands

Until recently, discriminating between homomeric 5‐HT₃A and heteromeric 5‐HT₃AB receptors was only possible with ligands that bind in the receptor pore. This study describes the first series of ligands that can discriminate between these receptor types at the level of the orthosteric binding site. During a recent fragment screen, 2‐chloro‐3‐(4‐methylpiperazin‐1‐yl)quinoxaline (VUF10166) was identified as a ligand that displays an 83‐fold difference in [³H]granisetron binding affinity between 5‐HT₃A and 5‐HT₃AB receptors. Fragment hit exploration, initiated from VUF10166 and 3‐(4‐methylpiperazin‐1‐yl)quinoxalin‐2‐ol, resulted in a series of compounds with higher affinity at either 5‐HT₃A or 5‐HT₃AB receptors. These ligands reveal that a single atom is sufficient to change the selectivity profile of a compound. At the extremes of the new compounds were 2‐amino‐3‐(4‐methylpiperazin‐1‐yl)quinoxaline, which showed 11‐fold selectivity for the 5‐HT₃A receptor, and 2‐(4‐methylpiperazin‐1‐yl)quinoxaline, which showed an 8.3‐fold selectivity for the 5‐HT₃AB receptor. These compounds represent novel molecular tools for studying 5‐HT₃ receptor subtypes and could help elucidate their physiological roles.     

Isoxazole‐Based‐Scaffold Inhibitors Targeting Cyclooxygenases (COXs)

A new set of cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitors endowed with an additional functionality was explored. These new compounds also contained either rhodamine 6G or 6,7‐dimethoxy‐1,2,3,4‐tetrahydroisoquinoline, two moieties typical of efflux pump substrates and inhibitors, respectively. Among all the synthesized compounds, two new COX inhibitors with opposite selectivity were discovered: compound 8 [N‐(9‐{2‐[(4‐{2‐[3‐(5‐chlorofuran‐2‐yl)‐4‐phenylisoxazol‐5‐yl]acetamido}butyl)carbamoyl]phenyl‐6‐(ethylamino)‐2,7‐dimethyl‐3H‐xanthen‐3‐ylidene}ethanaminium chloride] was found to be a selective COX‐1 inhibitor, whereas 17 (2‐[3,4‐bis(4‐methoxyphenyl)isoxazol‐5‐yl]‐1‐[6,7‐dimethoxy‐3,4‐dihydroisoquinolin‐2‐(1H)‐yl]ethanone) was found to be a sub‐micromolar selective COX‐2 inhibitor. However, both were shown to interact with P‐glycoprotein. Docking experiments helped to clarify the molecular aspects of the observed COX selectivity.     

Exploration of Sulfur‐Containing Analogues for Imaging Vesicular Acetylcholine Transporter in the Brain

Sixteen new sulfur‐containing compounds targeting the vesicular acetylcholine transporter (VAChT) were synthesized and assessed for in vitro binding affinities. Enantiomers (?)‐(1‐(3‐hydroxy‐1,2,3,4‐tetrahydronaphthalen‐2‐yl)piperidin‐4‐yl)(4‐(methylthio)phenyl)methanone [(?)‐ 8 ] and (?)‐(4‐((2‐fluoroethyl)thio)phenyl)(1‐(3‐hydroxy‐1,2,3,4‐tetrahydronaph‐thalen‐2‐yl)piperidin‐4‐yl)methanone [(?)‐ 14 a ] displayed high binding affinities, with respective K_i values of 1.4 and 2.2 nm for human VAChT, moderate and high selectivity for human VAChT over σ₁ (≈13‐fold) and σ₂ receptors (>420‐fold). Radiosyntheses of (?)‐[¹¹C] 8 and (?)‐[¹⁸F] 14 a were achieved using conventional methods. Ex vivo autoradiography and biodistribution studies in Sprague–Dawley rats indicated that both radiotracers have the capacity to penetrate the blood–brain barrier, with high initial brain uptake at 5 min and rapid washout. The striatal region had the highest accumulation for both radiotracers. Pretreating the rats with the VAChT ligand (?)‐vesamicol decreased brain uptake for both radiotracers. Pretreating the rats with the σ₁ ligand YUN‐122 (N‐(4‐benzylcyclohexyl)‐2‐(2‐fluorophenyl)acetamide) also decreased brain uptake, suggesting these two radiotracers also bind to the σ₁ receptor in vivo. The microPET study of (?)‐[¹¹C] 8 in the brain of a non‐human primate showed high striatal accumulation that peaked quickly and washed out rapidly. Although preliminary results indicated these two sulfur‐containing radiotracers have high binding affinities for VAChT with rapid washout kinetics from the striatum, their σ₁ receptor binding properties limit their potential as radiotracers for quantifying VAChT in vivo.     

Sulfotyrosine recognition as marker for druggable sites in the extracellular space

Chemokine signaling is a well-known agent of autoimmune disease, HIV infection, and cancer. Drug discovery efforts for these signaling molecules have focused on developing inhibitors targeting their associated G protein-coupled receptors. Recently, we used a structure-based approach directed at the sulfotyrosine-binding pocket of the chemokine CXCL12, and thereby demonstrated that small molecule inhibitors acting upon the chemokine ligand form an alternative therapeutic avenue. Although the 50 members of the chemokine family share varying degrees of sequence homology (some as little as 20%), all members retain the canonical chemokine fold. Here we show that an equivalent sulfotyrosine-binding pocket appears to be conserved across the chemokine superfamily. We monitored sulfotyrosine binding to four representative chemokines by NMR. The results suggest that most chemokines harbor a sulfotyrosine recognition site analogous to the cleft on CXCL12 that binds sulfotyrosine 21 of the receptor CXCR4. Rational drug discovery efforts targeting these sites may be useful in the development of specific as well as broad-spectrum chemokine inhibitors.     

Pharmacophore‐Based Design of Novel Oxadiazoles as Selective Sphingosine‐1‐phosphate (S1P) Receptor Agonists with in vivo Efficacy

Sphingosine‐1‐phosphate (S1P) receptor agonists have shown promise as therapeutic agents for multiple sclerosis (MS) due to their regulatory roles within the immune, central nervous system, and cardiovascular system. Here, the design and optimization of novel [1,2,4]oxadiazole derivatives as selective S1P receptor agonists are described. The structure–activity relationship exploration was carried out on the three dominant segments of the series: modification of the polar head group (P), replacement of the oxadiazole linker (L) with different five‐membered heterocycles, and the use of diverse 2,2′‐disubstituted biphenyl moieties as the hydrophobic tail (H). All three segments have a significant impact on potency, S1P receptor subtype selectivity, physicochemical properties, and in vitro absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion and toxicity (ADMET) profile of the compounds. From these optimization studies, a selective S1P₁ agonist, N‐methyl‐N‐(4‐{5‐[2‐methyl‐2′‐(trifluoromethyl)biphenyl‐4‐yl]‐1,2,4‐oxadiazol‐3‐yl}benzyl)glycine ( 45 ), and a dual S1P_1,5 agonist, N‐methyl‐N‐(3‐{5‐[2′‐methyl‐2‐(trifluoromethyl)biphenyl‐4‐yl]‐1,2,4‐oxadiazol‐3‐yl}benzyl)glycine ( 49 ), emerged as frontrunners. These compounds distribute predominantly in lymph nodes and brain over plasma and induce long lasting decreases in lymphocyte count after oral administration. When evaluated head‐to‐head in an experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis mouse model, together with the marketed drug fingolimod, a pan‐S1P receptor agonist, S1P_1,5 agonist 49 demonstrated comparable efficacy while S1P₁‐selective agonist 45 was less potent. Compound 49 is not a prodrug, and its improved property profile should translate into a safer treatment of relapsing forms of MS.     

Hybrids from Farnesylthiosalicylic Acid and Hydroxamic Acid as Dual Ras‐Related Signaling and Histone Deacetylase (HDAC) Inhibitors: Design,Synthesis and Biological Evaluation

A novel series of hybrids was designed and synthesized by combining key elements from farnesylthiosalicylic acid (FTS) and hydroxamic acid. Several 3,7,11‐trimethyldodeca‐2,6,10‐trien‐1‐yl) thio)benzamide derivatives, particularly those with branched and linear aliphatic linkers between the hydroxamic zinc binding group (ZBG) and the benzamide core, not only displayed significant antitumor activities against six human cancer cells but also exhibited histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitory effects in vitro. Among them, N‐(4‐(hydroxyamino)‐4‐oxobutyl)‐2‐(((2E,6E)‐3,7,11‐trimethyldodeca‐2,6, 10‐trien‐1‐yl)thio)benzamide ( 8 d ) was the most potent, with IC₅₀ values of 4.9–7.6 μM ; these activities are eight‐ to sixteen‐fold more potent than FTS and comparable to that of suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA). Derivative 8 d induced cell cycle arrest in the G0/G1 phase, inhibited the acetylation of histone H3 and α‐tubulin, and blocked Ras‐related signaling pathways in a dose‐dependent manner. The improved tumor growth inhibition and cell‐cycle arrest in vitro might result from the dual inhibition. These findings suggest dual inhibitors of Ras‐related signaling pathway and HDAC hold promise as therapeutic agents for the treatment of cancer.     

From Type I to Type II: Design,Synthesis, and Characterization of Potent Pyrazin‐2‐ones as DFG‐Out Inhibitors of PDGFRβ

Reversible protein kinase inhibitors that bind in the ATP cleft can be classified as type I or type II binders. Of these, type I inhibitors address the active form, whereas type II inhibitors typically lock the kinase in an inactive form. At the molecular level, the conformation of the flexible activation loop holding the key DFG motif controls access to the ATP site, thereby determining an active or inactive kinase state. Accordingly, type I and type II kinase inhibitors bind to so‐called DFG‐in or DFG‐out conformations, respectively. Based on our former study on highly selective platelet‐derived growth factor receptor β (PDGFRβ) pyrazin‐2‐one type I inhibitors, we expanded this scaffold toward the deep pocket, yielding the highly potent and effective type II inhibitor 5 (4‐[(4‐methylpiperazin‐1‐yl)methyl]‐N‐[3‐[[6‐oxo‐5‐(3,4,5‐trimethoxyphenyl)‐1H‐pyrazin‐3‐yl]methyl]phenyl]benzamide). In vitro characterization, including selectivity panel data from activity‐based assays (300 kinases) and affinity‐based assays (97 kinases) of these PDGFRβ type I ( 1 ; 5‐(4‐hydroxy‐3‐methoxy‐phenyl)‐3‐(3,4,5‐trimethoxyphenyl)‐1H‐pyrazin‐2‐one) and II ( 5 ) inhibitors showing the same pyrazin‐2‐one chemotype are compared. Implications are discussed regarding the data for selectivity and efficacy of type I and type II ligands.     

Mono‐, Di‐ and Tetra‐Cationic Surfactants as Carbon Steel Corrosion Inhibitors

Corrosion inhibition of three new synthesized cationic surfactants, N‐(2‐(((Z)‐4‐(pyridin‐4‐yl)but‐3‐en‐1‐yl)amino)ethyl)‐N‐(2‐((E)‐(pyridin‐4‐ylmethylene)amino)ethyl)dodecan‐1‐aminium bromide I(4N), N¹,N²‐didodecyl‐N¹‐((Z)‐4‐(pyridin‐4‐yl)but‐3‐en‐1‐yl)‐N²‐(2‐((E)‐(pyridin‐4‐ylmethylene)amino)ethyl)ethane‐1,2‐diaminium bromide II(4N) and 1‐dodecyl‐4‐((E)‐((2‐(dodecyl(2‐(dodecyl((Z)‐4‐(1‐dodecylpyridin‐1‐ium‐4‐yl)but‐3‐en‐1‐yl)ammonio)ethyl)ammonio)ethyl)imino)methyl)pyridin‐1‐ium bromide IV(4N) on carbon steel was investigated by weight loss, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and polarization measurements. Results show that the synthesized cationic surfactants inhibit corrosion of carbon steel in 1 M HCl. The inhibitive action occurs by virtue of adsorption on the metal surface following a Langmuir adsorption isotherm model. Polarization curves reveal that the investigated cationic surfactants can be classified as mixed inhibitor types. The variations in the corrosion inhibition efficiency between three cationic surfactants are correlated with their chemical structures, with more hydrophobic surfactants yielding higher inhibition efficiency.     

Anti‐HIV Small‐Molecule Binding in the Peptide Subpocket of the CXCR4:CVX15 Crystal Structure

The CXC chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) is involved in chemotaxis and serves as a coreceptor for T‐tropic HIV‐1 viral entry, thus making this receptor an attractive drug target. Recently, crystal structures of CXCR4 were reported as complexes with the small molecule IT1t and the CVX15 peptide. Follow‐up efforts to model different antagonists into the small molecule CXCR4:IT1t crystal structure did not generate poses consistent with either the X‐ray crystal structure or site‐directed mutagenesis (SDM). Here, we compare the binding pockets of the two CXCR4 crystal structures, revealing differences in helices IV, V, VI, and VII, with major differences for the His203 residue buried in the binding pocket. The small molecule antagonist AMD11070 was docked into both CXCR4 crystal structures. An AMD11070 pose identified from the CXCR4:CVX15 model presented interactions with Asp171, Glu288, Trp94, and Asp97, consistent with published SDM data, thus suggesting it is the bioactive pose. A CXCR4 receptor model was optimized around this pose of AMD11070, and the resulting model correlated HIV‐1 inhibition with MM‐GBSA docking scores for a congeneric AMD11070‐like series. Subsequent NAMFIS NMR results successfully linked the proposed binding pose to an independent experimental structure. These results strongly suggest that not all small molecules will bind to CXCR4 in a similar manner as IT1t. Instead, the CXCR4:CVX15 crystal structure may provide a binding locus for small organic molecules that is more suitable than the secondary IT1t site. This work is expected to provide modeling insights useful for future CXCR4 antagonist and X4‐tropic HIV‐1 based drug design efforts.     

Synthese des 5‐[(Acetylhydrazono)‐(4‐chlorphenyl)‐methyl]thiophen‐2‐yl‐esters der Trifluormethansulfonsäure

The synthesis of 5‐[(acetylhydrazono)‐(4‐chlorophenyl)‐methyl]thiophen‐2‐yl ester of the trifluoromethanesulfonic acid ( 2a ) and its N‐methyl derivative 2b was attempted. Oxidation of 2‐thiophene boronic acid to 2‐hydroxythiophene and in situ reaction there of with triflic anhydride yielded the hitherto unknown thiophene‐2‐yl ester of the trifluormethanesulfonic acid ( 6 ) which was transformed under Friedel‐Crafts conditions into 5‐(4‐chlorobenzoyl)‐thiophene‐2‐yl ester of the trifluoromethanesulfonic acid ( 3 ). Reaction of 3 with acetyl hydrazine resulted in the formation of the title compound 2a , albeit in low yield. The conversion of N′‐[(5‐bromothiophen‐2‐yl)‐(4‐chlorophenyl)‐methylen]‐N‐methylhydrazide ( 4b ) via boronic acid into 5‐[(acetylmethylhydrazono)‐(4‐chlorophenyl)‐methyl]thiophen‐2‐yl ester of the trifluoromethanesulfonic acid ( 2b ) was not successful.     

Synthesis,Structure–Activity Relationship Studies,and ADMET Properties of 3‐Aminocyclohex‐2‐en‐1‐ones as Chemokine Receptor 2 (CXCR2) Antagonists

Herein we describe the synthesis and structure–activity relationships of 3‐aminocyclohex‐2‐en‐1‐one derivatives as novel chemokine receptor 2 (CXCR2) antagonists. Thirteen out of 44 derivatives were found to inhibit CXCR2 downstream signaling in a Tango assay specific for CXCR2, with IC₅₀ values less than 10 μm . In silico ADMET prediction suggests that all active compounds possess drug‐like properties. None of these compounds show significant cytotoxicity, suggesting their potential application in inflammatory mediated diseases. A structure–activity relationship (SAR) map has been generated to gain better understanding of their binding mechanism to guide further optimization of these new CXCR2 antagonists.     

The Role of Chemokine Receptor CXCR3 and Its Ligands in Renal Cell Carcinoma

The major invasive subtype of kidney cancer is renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The essential components of cancer development are chronic inflammation and neoangiogenesis. It has been suggested that the chemokine ligand 9, -10, –11 (CXCL9–11) and chemokine receptor 3 (CXCR3) chemokines receptor expressed on monocytes, T and NK cells may be involved in the inhibition of angiogenesis. However, to date, little is known about the potential clinical significance of these chemokines and their receptor in renal cell carcinoma. Therefore, in this review, we described the role of CXCR3 and its ligands in pathogenesis of RCC. We performed an extensive search of the current literature in our investigation, using the MEDLINE/PubMed database. The changes of chemokines and their specific receptor in renal cell carcinoma were observed. Published studies revealed an increased expression of CXCR3 and elevated concentration of its ligands in RCC. The association between treatment of RCC and CXCL9–11/CXCR3 concentration and expression was also observed. Moreover, CXCR3 and its ligands levels were related to patient’s prognosis, risk of metastasis and tumor growth. This review describes the potential role of CXCR3 and its ligands in pathogenesis of RCC, as well as their potential immune-therapeutic significance. However, future studies should aim to confirm the clinical and prognostic role of CXCL9–11/CXCR3 in renal cell carcinoma.     

Identification and Optimization of the First Highly Selective GLUT1 Inhibitor BAY‐876

Despite the long‐known fact that the facilitative glucose transporter GLUT1 is one of the key players safeguarding the increase in glucose consumption of many tumor entities even under conditions of normal oxygen supply (known as the Warburg effect), only few endeavors have been undertaken to find a GLUT1‐selective small‐molecule inhibitor. Because other transporters of the GLUT1 family are involved in crucial processes, these transporters should not be addressed by such an inhibitor. A high‐throughput screen against a library of ～3 million compounds was performed to find a small molecule with this challenging potency and selectivity profile. The N‐(1H‐pyrazol‐4‐yl)quinoline‐4‐carboxamides were identified as an excellent starting point for further compound optimization. After extensive structure–activity relationship explorations, single‐digit nanomolar inhibitors with a selectivity factor of >100 against GLUT2, GLUT3, and GLUT4 were obtained. The most promising compound, BAY‐876 [N⁴‐[1‐(4‐cyanobenzyl)‐5‐methyl‐3‐(trifluoromethyl)‐1H‐pyrazol‐4‐yl]‐7‐fluoroquinoline‐2,4‐dicarboxamide], showed good metabolic stability in vitro and high oral bioavailability in vivo.     

Fluorophore‐Labeled Cyclooxygenase‐2 Inhibitors for the Imaging of Cyclooxygenase‐2 Overexpression in Cancer: Synthesis and Biological Studies

A group of cyclooxygenase‐2 (COX‐2)‐specific fluorescent cancer biomarkers were synthesized by linking the anti‐inflammatory drugs ibuprofen, (S)‐naproxen, and celecoxib to the 7‐nitrobenzofurazan (NBD) fluorophore. In vitro COX‐1/COX‐2 inhibition studies indicated that all of these fluorescent conjugates are COX‐2 inhibitors (IC₅₀ range: 0.19–23.0 μM ) with an appreciable COX‐2 selectivity index (SI≥4.3–444). In this study the celecoxib–NBD conjugate N‐(2‐((7‐nitrobenzo[c][1,2,5]oxadiazol‐4‐yl)amino)ethyl)‐4‐(5‐(p‐tolyl)‐3‐(trifluoromethyl)‐1H‐pyrazol‐1‐yl)benzenesulfonamide ( 14 ), which displayed the highest COX‐2 inhibitory potency and selectivity (COX‐2 IC₅₀=0.19 μM ; SI=443.6), was identified as an impending COX‐2‐specific biomarker for the fluorescence imaging of cancer using a COX‐2‐expressing human colon cancer cell line (HCA‐7).     

Copper‐Assisted Click Reactions for Activity‐Based Proteomics: Fine‐Tuned Ligands and Refined Conditions Extend the Scope of Application

Copper‐catalysed alkyne–azide 1,3‐dipolar cycloaddition (CuAAC) is the predominantly used bioconjugation method in the field of activity‐based protein profiling (ABPP). Several limitations, however, including conversion efficiency, protein denaturation and buffer compatibility, restrict the scope of established procedures. We introduce an ABPP customised click methodology based on refined CuAAC conditions together with new accelerating copper ligands. A screen of several triazole compounds revealed the cationic quaternary {3‐[4‐({bis[(1‐tert‐butyl‐1H‐1,2,3‐triazol‐4‐yl)methyl]amino}methyl)‐1H‐1,2,3‐triazol‐1‐yl]propyl}trimethylammonium trifluoroacetate (TABTA) to be a superior ligand. TABTA exhibited excellent in vitro conjugation kinetics and optimal ABPP labelling activity while almost exclusively preserving the native protein fold. The application of this CuAAC‐promoting system is amenable to existing protocols with minimal perturbations and is even compatible with previously unusable buffer systems such as Tris ? HCl.     

MyD88 in Macrophages Enhances Liver Fibrosis by Activation of NLRP3 Inflammasome in HSCs

Chronic liver disease mediated by the activation of hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) leads to liver fibrosis. The signal adaptor MyD88 of Toll-like receptor (TLR) signaling is involved during the progression of liver fibrosis. However, the specific role of MyD88 in myeloid cells in liver fibrosis has not been thoroughly investigated. In this study, we used a carbon tetrachloride (CCl₄)-induced mouse fibrosis model in which MyD88 was selectively depleted in myeloid cells. MyD88 deficiency in myeloid cells attenuated liver fibrosis in mice and decreased inflammatory cell infiltration. Furthermore, deficiency of MyD88 in macrophages inhibits the secretion of CXC motif chemokine 2 (CXCL2), which restrains the activation of HSCs characterized by NLR Family Pyrin Domain Containing 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome activation. Moreover, targeting CXCL2 by CXCR2 inhibitors attenuated the activation of HSCs and reduced liver fibrosis. Thus, MyD88 may represent a potential candidate target for the prevention and treatment of liver fibrosis.