煤 /重油加氢共炼中SDBS对煤担载铁镍催化剂的改性效果

以广西褐煤为载体煤,铁盐和镍盐为活性组分,考察了以十二烷基苯磺酸钠(SDBS)作为表面活性剂,对沉淀-氧化法制备煤担载型铁镍催化剂(FeNi/C)的影响以及制备的催化剂在煤/重油加氢共炼中的反应性能。采用XRD和TEM分析了FeNi和FeNi-SDBS的物相组成与微观形貌变化,并以SEM-mapping手段对比了Fe元素和Ni元素在FeNi/C及FeNi-SDBS/C表面的分散效果,采用高压釜实验评价了不同催化剂的反应性能,并对反应后的固体产物采用元素分析、FTIR和SEM进行组成和结构性质研究。结果表明:SDBS的加入显著降低了催化剂的平均粒径,α/γ-FeOOH和Fe0.67Ni0.33OOH等活性相的晶体结构特征减弱,在载体煤上得到了更好的分散效果;FeNi-SDBS/C催化剂相比FeNi/C催化剂有更高的油收率和干基无灰煤转化率,催化活性明显提高;采用SDBS改性的催化剂反应后得到固体产物的n(H)∶n(C)高、脂肪链长度低、芳环取代度大、结构疏松且平均粒径小,表面改性后的FeNi-SDBS/C催化剂拥有更强的促进煤加氢转化和抑制体系缩合生焦的作用。     

煤直接液化催化剂研究进展

我国煤炭储量丰富,煤液化制油技术是缓解我国一次能源结构中原油供应不足的措施。煤液化工艺的各种催化剂中,铁基催化剂以其高效、廉价及低污染而倍受青睐。非铁系催化剂有Sn和Zn水溶液、含碘的煤液化催化剂、碱金属氢氧化物或碳酸盐、Cr-Mo-Ⅷ族的加氢催化液化催化和硫转移剂等。概述了近年来煤液化技术在铁系催化剂研究、回收利用、制备工艺和预处理等方面的研究进展,综述了煤液化催化反应器研究状况。     

Coal liquefaction using iron complexes as catalysts

Hydroliquefaction of Japanese Miike and Taiheiyo coals was carried out using various iron complexes as catalysts in tetralin at 375–445 °C. Iron pentacarbonyl (Fe(CO)₅) showed the highest catalytic activity, increasing coal conversion by about 10% at 425 °C under an initial hydrogen pressure of 5 MPa. Amounts of hydrogen transferred to coal increased from 1.4–2.3 wt% of daf coal in the absence of the catalyst to 2.5–4.2 wt% of daf coal in the presence of Fe(CO)₅ at 425 °C.     

Hydrogenation of a brown coal pretreated with water-soluble nickel/molybdenum and cobalt/molybdenum catalysts

Loy Yang brown coal treated with cobalt acetate/ammonium molybdate (Co/Mo) gave lower conversions than the very high values obtained for the same coal treated with nickel acetate/ammonium molybdate (Ni/Mo) when reacted with hydrogen at 400°C. The difference in conversions obtained between the two catalyst systems decreased with increasing time. Addition of sulphur as carbon disulphide (CS₂) eliminated the difference between the Co/Mo and Ni/Mo catalyst systems, but neither system was more active than a sulphided Mo catalyst. Addition of a hydrogen donor solvent, tetralin, to a reaction in the absence of sulphur decreased conversion for the Ni/Mo catalysed system, but increased that for the Co/Mo system. The order of activity in reactions without solvent or added sulphur for the coal treated with the individual metals was CoMo < Ni. In the presence of sulphur the order was Co Ni < Mo; the addition of sulphur led to no significant improvement with Co catalysts.     

煤催化气化技术的研究现状与展望

煤催化气化由于可以大幅度降低操作条件,实现定向转化,目前正受到国内外重视。本文综述了碱金属、碱土金属、过渡金属催化剂与复合催化剂在煤催化气化过程中的活性、优缺点、反应机理等。对影响煤催化气化的各类因素如煤阶、矿物质、催化剂添加方式、添加量、气化条件等进行了分析。介绍了当前催化气化工业化进程以及合成天然气甲烷和催化气化制氢两种工艺。当前研究的难点是兼顾催化剂的效率与经济性,煤催化气化未来将以开发高活性、易回收且廉价的催化剂为研究方向。     

煤催化加氢气化研究进展

煤加氢气化制天然气技术具有工艺路径短、热效率高等优点,其应用基础研究备受关注。但煤中存在部分致密的芳香碳结构,加氢反应性较差,即使在苛刻的反应条件下(~1 000℃、~7 MPa H_2),仍难以转化。通过引入催化剂,进行煤催化加氢气化可在温和的反应条件下实现煤的碳转化率和CH_4收率的同步提高。论述了碱金属(K、Na等)、碱土金属(Ca)和过渡金属(Fe、Co、Ni等)催化剂对模型碳加氢气化的催化作用原理。探讨了反应温度、氢气压力、和碳结构对C-H_2催化反应的影响规律,分析了适用于原煤催化加氢气化的最佳催化剂及工艺条件,并从CH_4和轻质液体焦油等产物生成规律、煤中碳结构随着反应进行的衍变过程等角度,讨论了催化剂分别对煤加氢热解和热解半焦加氢气化的催化作用行为。提出了煤催化加氢气化联产CH_4和轻质液体焦油技术从基础走向应用的进一步研究建议。现有研究结果表明,过渡金属与碱土金属组成的二元催化剂(Fe/Co/Ni-Ca)对煤加氢气化的活性较高。过渡金属元素在反应过程中主要提供C-H_2反应所需的活性氢,并削弱C—C键的键能;碱土金属元素Ca主要促进Fe/Co/Ni的分散,防止其发生硫中毒失活,并增强Fe/Co/Ni与碳之间的相互作用。温度升高一方面为化学键断裂过程提供了更高能量,加速C-H_2反应,另一方面促进催化剂在煤结构中扩散,提升催化剂的供氢和断键效率。升高压力促进了活性氢的供应,同时CH_4浓度得到稀释,反应向生成CH_4的方向移动。以5%Co-1%Ca为催化剂,在850℃、3 MPa H_2反应条件下,30 min内可同时达到90.0%的碳转化率和77.3%的CH_4收率。Co-Ca催化剂在煤加氢热解过程中具有催化解聚和催化加氢的作用,提高焦油和CH_4收率,同时催化剂在煤加氢热解过程中对煤结构产生催化活化作用,使得生成的半焦具有较高的气化活性。煤催化加氢气化的机理研究目前仍处于推测阶段,另外,该技术气化剂、煤种的适应性,催化剂循环利用性能有待进一步阐明。     

氨分解制氢催化剂研究进展

随着环保法规日趋严格,清洁氢能的生产和应用引起关注,氨分解制氢是其中重要途径之一。综述Ru、Ni和Fe等氨分解催化剂的研究进展,Ru催化剂具有较高的催化活性,但由于资源有限和价格昂贵等因素使其在工业应用方面受到限制。以Fe和Ni为代表的非贵金属催化剂资源丰富,价格低廉,氨分解反应转化率高,具有潜在的工业应用前景。我国独创的新一代Fe_(1-x)O基新型熔铁催化剂是目前世界上活性最高的氨合成催化剂,根据微观可逆性原理,新型熔铁催化剂也是氨分解反应活性最好的制氢催化剂。     

铁、钴、镍、铜和锌催化剂催化氨硼烷水解产氢性能研究

采用浸渍-还原法制备了铁、钴、镍、铜和锌催化剂,考察了其催化氨硼烷水解产氢性能,并优化了钴催化剂的制备条件和反应条件。结果发现,铁催化剂中铁以Fe₂B合金相存在,钴催化剂中钴以金属钴存在,镍催化剂中镍以金属镍和Ni（OH）₂·2H₂O存在,铜催化剂中铜以金属铜和氧化亚铜存在,锌催化剂中锌以Zn₄SO₄（OH）₆·4H₂O存在。铁、钴、镍、铜和锌催化剂催化氨硼烷水解产氢活性由大到小顺序为钴催化剂、镍催化剂、铜催化剂、铁催化剂、锌催化剂。显然,具有金属钴相的钴催化剂、金属镍相的镍催化剂和金属铜相的铜催化剂催化氨硼烷产氢活性高于具有Fe₂B合金相的铁催化剂。锌催化剂在制备条件下不能被还原为金属相,它几乎没有催化氨硼烷产氢活性。氯化钴与还原剂硼氢化钠的物质的量比为1∶1.3、还原温度为303 K时制备的钴催化剂催化BH₃NH₃水解产氢性能最佳。反应动力学计算表明钴催化剂催化BH₃NH₃水解产氢反应对氨硼烷浓度的反应级数为零级,对钴催化剂浓度的反应级数为一级,活化能为58 kJ/mol。     

Effect of sulphur on coal liquefaction in the presence of dispersed iron or molybdenum catalysts

The effects of dispersed catalysts on coal liquefaction under hydrogen pressure were studied using small autoclaves. The catalysts were generated in situ by addition of elemental sulphur plus an oil-soluble carboxylic salt of either iron or molybdenum. Finely divided catalysts of relatively high activity were generated by this method. Residues isolated after liquefaction with added iron carboxylate and sulphur contained pyrrhotite, which is proposed to be the catalytically active species. The prime role of sulphur is to form pyrrhotite in combination with the iron. Addition of sulphur alone did not increase conversion. This method of catalyst preparation seems useful for further scientific study of the relationship between sulphur, metal sulphide catalysts and liquefaction activity.     

Catalytic activity of iron compounds for coal liquefaction

The catalytic activity of pyrite and synthesized -FeOOH in coal liquefaction was investigated using batch autoclaves with the aim of developing an industrial iron catalyst. The results indicate that the presence of H₂S helps gaseous hydrogen transferring and prevents deactivation so that the catalyst promotes hydrocracking of coal and hydrogenation of the products. The activity converges with excess H₂S and sulfur addition equivalent to an S/Fe molar ratio of 2.0 being reasonable for the activation. The active site is located on the outer surface, with finely divided catalysts exhibiting high activity. Both pulverized pyrite and synthesized -FeOOH are sufficiently fine as to exhibit high activity in the process. Pulverized pyrite is an industrially feasible iron catalyst for coal liquefaction process, because it is inexpensive and does not require sulfur addition.     

Early coal hydrogenation catalysis

Three inputs were necessary to make catalytic hydrogenation of coal possible. One was the ammonia synthesis which, in 1910, introduced high pressure and temperature into the chemical industry. The second was the experimentation by F. Bergius who showed, in 1913, that coal can be liquefied by adding hydrogen at high pressure and temperature. The liquid products were similar to coal tar. They were not of the quality required for gasoline or diesel fuel production. The use of catalysts to refine the coal oil appeared then to be hopeless since coals contained sulfur, a poison for all then known hydrogenation catalysts. The third input was methanol synthesis in 1923. M. Pier found selective, oxidic catalysts that were less sensitive to sulfur than e.g. the metallic catalyst for the ammonia synthesis.In 1924 M. Pier, in the laboratories of the BASF, prepared sulfur resistant coal hydrogenation catalysts: sulfides and oxides of molybdenum, tungsten, and the iron group metals. With these catalysts it became possible to add hydrogen; split carbon-carbon bonds; and eliminate such heteroelements as sulfur, oxygen and nitrogen from coals and oils. Thus fuels were produced that met petroleum fuel specifications.Optimum catalyst action was achieved by subdividing coal hydrogenation into two stages. The coal was converted, with a dispersed catalyst in the “liquid phase”, into middle oil. This was then hydrogenated over fixed bed catalyst, in the “vapor phase”, to gasoline. On this basis a large scale demonstration plant for the liquefaction of central German brown coal was erected in 1927.The development of catalysts for these two stages proceeded on different routes. Liquid phase catalysts were discarded after one pass through the reactor. They were cheap, or used in very small amounts. It was found soon that coal of different rank required different catalysts, and that the mineral matter of the coal played an important role.The first commercially used vapor phase catalysts were of the hydrorefining type. Hydrocracking activity was achieved by using high temperatures. A great step forward was made in 1930 when a special preparation of tungsten disulfide permitted hydrocracking activity at low temperatures. Thus the first essentially dual function catalyst was found. Its hydrocracking activitity was further increased, and gasolines with a higher octane number were obtained by using it on acidic supports such as materials containing alumina-silica.Such supported catalysts were poisoned by the nitrogen compounds present in coal oils. Therefore a refining step for these oils was needed. The vapor phase was subdivided into the “prehydrogenation” (hydrorefining) and “splitting hydrogenation” (hydrocracking) steps. Further development of catalysts with specific functions for these two steps proceeded rapidly. In addition, separate catalysts were developed for the production of gasolines with a high content of aromatics.The various catalysts developed primarily for the hydrogenation of coal derived oils introduced hydrogen processing into the petroleum refining industry. There they were further modified and improved for the processing of petroleum. These improved catalysts, in turn, will be of help to a future coal liquefaction industry.     

铁系催化剂对煤高温快速液化的影响

以兖州煤为研究对象,采用微型反应釜研究了两种铁系催化剂对煤高温快速液化的影响.结果表明,担载Fe2S3的催化剂和高分散铁系催化剂对煤的热解行为影响较小;担载Fe2S3催化剂促进了氢气参与反应和煤液化产物向轻质化转化,在优秀和足量的供氢溶剂条件下,溶剂的供氢速度明显优于氢气转换的供氢速度,催化剂的作用不明显;对比添加高分散铁系催化剂并加助剂S和添加Fe2S3催化剂的煤高温快速液化,发现元素S的作用与S和主催化剂铁的结合形态有关.     

原位担载型铁系煤直接液化催化剂的研究

考察了原位担载型铁基催化剂制备过程中,交换前驱体试剂ＦｅＣｌ３和Ｎａ２Ｓ的添加顺序对几种担载在不同煤表面上的催化剂性质的影响。研究结果表明,交换ＦｅＣｌ３和Ｎａ２Ｓ两种前驱体试剂的添加顺序,对不同煤种的液化效果产生不同程度的影响。这种民载体煤表面对离子的选择性吸附以及催化剂表面性质有关。     

An investigation on the heterogeneous nature of mineral matters in Assam (India) coal by CCSEM technique

This is a very first preliminary investigation on the distribution of heterogeneous nature of mineral matter in one of the industrially important Assam (India) pulverized coal using computer-controlled scanning electron microscopy (CCSEM). The results show that clay minerals, quartz, pyrite, and pyrrhotite form the bulk of the mineral matter. Minor minerals, such as calcite, dolomite, ankerite, barite, oxidized pyrrhotite, and gypsum, are also observed in the sample. The particle size distribution (PSD) of the included minerals is generally observed to be finer than that of the excluded ones in the coal. As a consequence, the coal rich in included minerals has more small mineral particles, which may affect its reactivity. Regarding the association of individual mineral species, the proportion of included to excluded is found to be higher in major cases. With regard to the modes of occurrence of major inorganic elements, it is found that Si mostly occurs as quartz and clay minerals, while Al mostly occurs as silicate minerals. Fe is primarily present as iron sulfides, iron oxide, and Fe-Al-silicate. S is partitioned into iron sulfides and gypsum. Most Ca occurs as carbonates and gypsum, with a minor fraction associated with clay minerals. Mg is mainly present as dolomite and clay minerals, with a very minor fraction present as ankerite. The majority of alkali elements are associated with aluminosilicates. P is mostly associated with kaolinite and/or present as more complex compounds containing Al, Si, and other elements as apatite is found to be absent in the coal studied. Ti is mainly present as rutile and kaolinite.     

Beneficiation of micro-fine magnetic minerals from reductive iron ore with ultrafine grinding-magnetic flocculation separation

Beneficiation of micro-fine magnetic minerals from reductive iron ore was investigated. Sample characteristics and main force analysis of magnetic floc were conducted. The results indicated that the iron phase in reductive iron ores was predominantly metallic iron (below 20 μm). By applying ultrafine grinding-magnetic flocculation separation (MFS) to the raw ore (29.85% Fe), a concentrate assaying 74.12% Fe with 81.45% iron recovery was obtained. The iron recovery increased by 6.68% compared with the conventional magnetic separation (CMS). The high efficiency in beneficiation may be attributed to an increase in magnetic force on the micro-fine iron minerals in the form of flocs.     

Evidence for mineral matter forms in coal liquefaction extracts

High- and low-temperature ashes from feed coal, coal extract solution and filter cake from a two-stage coal liquefaction process have been studied by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy/energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence (SEM/EDX). Hydrocracking experiments using alumina support only, in place of the active Ni/Mo catalyst on alumina, were also carried out, with trace metal analysis of the coal extract solution feed and hydrocracked extracts using atomic absorption and emission spectroscopy. The major mineral transformations occurring were of pyrite to pyrrhotite and the fixation of organic sulphur by calcium carbonate. Mineral particles were not observed in the coal extract solution ashes, even under high magnification, and the study indicated that size alone was not a determining factor as to whether a coal mineral was to be found in a coal-derived liquid. None of the trace metals was deposited on the alumina support under hydrocracking conditions, in marked contrast to the results obtained with the normal Ni/Mo catalyst. These results lead to the conclusion that for the deposition of trace elements to occur a reaction must take place and hence the trace elements must be chemically bound in some form.     

Direct Coal Liquefaction Using Iron Carbonyl Powder Catalyst

Direct coal liquefaction involves catalyzed interactions between molecular hydrogen and coal‐oil slurries at elevated pressure and temperature, typically in the presence of an iron‐based catalyst. Iron carbonyl powder as an alternative first‐stage catalyst was investigated. A series of experimental tests under mild liquefaction conditions were carried out with a high‐pressure batch reactor in order to compare the performance of the iron carbonyl precursor to the traditional superfine iron oxide catalyst. The carbonyl iron powder performed very well in terms of total conversion of coal as well as yield of coal oil product. The iron carbonyl powder acts as an effective precursor for the in situ generation of active iron sulfide. The simple kinetic models for coal liquefaction in the literature were found to be qualitatively consistent with the yields of preasphaltenes, asphaltenes, and oils obtained from the experiments.     

Gasification of coal impregnated with catalyst during pulverization: effect of catalyst type and reactant gas on the gasification of Shin-Yubari coal

Shin-Yubari coal was impregnated with several catalysts of different chemical types during pulverization. The resultant system was more homogeneous and reactive than systems prepared by impregnation of coarse coal. The relative activities of the catalysts were determined as a function of gasification temperature, catalyst loading and gasifying agent. The activity sequence in steam was K ? Ba ? Ni ? Fe ? coal ash. Each catalyst had a unique reaction profile. For example, using steam the specific rate or the rate per remaining fixed-carbon weight decreased with time for the iron-catalysed reaction, whereas it increased for the potassium-catalysed reaction. A similar order of activity was observed in carbon dioxide, but a different sequence was noted for the hydrogenation reaction. Transition metal catalysts were the most active. The hydrogenation reaction profiles were different from the oxidation profiles.     

The liquefaction of Alberta subbituminous coals with iron-sulphur catalyst systems

The influence of iron catalyst systems on the liquefaction of an Alberta subbituminous B coal has been investigated. It was found that iron oxide and a sulphur additive gave the best coal conversion (88% daf) to useful products. Iron oxide alone had no effect, resulting in a coal conversion (70% daf) similar to that obtained with no added catalyst. Analyses of product distribution and quality for the iron catalyst systems studied lead to the conclusion that the major functions of the iron catalysts were to increase conversion and to inhibit repolymerization of primary coal products.     

复合铁催化剂对神木煤加氢热解产物收率的影响

在固定床上考察了神木煤加氢热解过程中复合铁催化剂对产物分布的影响,制备了铁-铝复合催化剂和铁-硅复合催化剂。结果显示,催化剂的添加可以显著提高神木煤加氢热解转化率,其中催化剂Al/3Fe、Al/3Fe-A以及Si/3Fe有利于焦油生成,焦油收率平均提高3.7%;催化剂Fe/3Al、Fe/3Al-A、Fe/3Si以及Fe/3Si-A有利于气体生成,气体收率平均提高6.8%。