The role of surface-sealant application on bond effectiveness of all-in-one self-etch adhesives

Purpose: To examine microleakage around Class-V restorations bonded with 3 current all-in-one adhesive systems in the presence or absence of surface-sealant in different evaluation groups.

Materials and Methods: Clearfil S3 Bond, G-Aenial Bond, and Optibond All-in-One (AiO), were used in the Class-V cavities in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions (control group) or were additionally combined with Fortify Plus surface-sealant (surface-sealant group). The two main treatment groups of the dentin adhesives were subdivided into four different evaluation groups (24 h, 6 months, 12 months, and 12 months with two applications); the teeth were immersed in 0.5% methylene blue dye solution for 24 h. Samples were then sectioned longitudinally in a bucco-lingual direction and evaluated for microleakage under a stereomicroscope. Dye penetration was scored at the enamel (occlusal) and dentin (gingival) margins.

Results: Microleakage scores were greater at the dentin margins compared with the enamel margins for Clearfil S3 Bond in all evaluation groups, whereas no difference was observed between enamel and dentin microleakage for Optibond AiO. Using Fortify Plus in the enamel margins decreased the microleakage scores of Clearfil S3 Bond. When the control and surface-sealant groups were compared in the G-Aenial Bond enamel margins, the application of surface-sealant significantly reduced microleakage after 6 and 12 months. For Optibond AiO, no statistically significant differences in enamel and dentin margins were observed between the control and surface-sealant application groups.

Conclusion: The application of surface-sealant could be considered appropriate for reducing microleakage in composite resin restorations, but this effect might depend on the dentin adhesive.     

Bonding of resin adhesives to caries-affected dentin – A systematic review

Minimal invasive dentistry aims at preserving the firm, discolored caries affected dentin (CAD), which is remineralizable. Research studies on resin adhesives are usually performed on sound dentin (SD), though CAD is the substrate routinely encountered for bonding in clinical practice. The aim of this paper was to systematically analyze the published literature on resin-dentin bonding to CAD substrate, in order to answer the question: “Does resin adhesive bonding to CAD produce lower bond strength when compared to SD?”. Three electronic databases (Pubmed, Scopus and ISI web of Science) were searched to identify original laboratory studies that evaluated the bond achieved between resin adhesive and natural CAD by measuring their bond strength. Only articles that met the specific inclusion criteria were included in the review. Among the 29 studies included for this review, majority of the studies had tested the simplified etch-and-rinse or self-etch adhesives. 85% of them showed higher bond strength to SD compared to CAD and the remaining 15% of them showed no difference between these two substrates. Among the studies that used 3-step etch-and-rinse adhesives, 40% showed higher and 60% showed no difference, when bond strength was compared between SD and CAD. Resin adhesives produce lower bond strength to caries-affected dentin than sound dentin. Research studies that reported bond strength of resin adhesives to dentin from sound extracted teeth alone cannot be blindly extrapolated to clinically relevant CAD. Hence, the results from such studies should be dealt with caution.     

Effect of saliva contamination on shear bond strength and microleakage of one-bottle etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives: scanning electron and confocal laser microscopic analyses

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of saliva contamination on shear bond strength, microleakage, and microstructure of the adhesive interface in two different adhesive systems by using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and confocal laser microscopy (CLSM). Materials and methods: Randomly, 228 third molars were allocated to six groups for an etch-and-rinse adhesive One-Step Plus (Bisco Inc.) and a self-etch adhesive G Bond (GC Corp.): Group 1 – manufacturer’s instructions were followed; Group 2 – involved contamination and drying before adhesive application; Group 3 – involved contamination, washing, and blot drying before adhesive application; Group 4 – involved contamination, etching, washing, and blot drying before adhesive application; Group 5 – involved contamination and drying after adhesive application, followed by adhesive reapplication; Group 6 – involved contamination and washing after adhesive application, followed by adhesive reapplication. Shear bond strength was tested after specimens were stored in distilled water at 37?°C for 24?h. Specimens were evaluated under a stereomicroscope for microleakage. Dentin–resin interfaces were evaluated by SEM and CLSM. Results: Group 2 for One-Step Plus and Group 3 for G Bond showed significantly lower bond strengths than control groups. Microleakage values were significantly greater at dentin than at enamel margins for all groups. In Group 2, for both adhesive systems, the highest microleakage was observed at dentin margins. Further, dentin–adhesive interfaces were not uniform and gaps were found by SEM and CLSM. Conclusions: The SEM and CLSM images demonstrated high variability of dentin–resin interfaces among saliva-contaminated groups. Rinsing the saliva and re-applying adhesive might be the best way to reduce the effect of saliva contamination on bond strength and microleakage.     

Effect of irradiation source on the dentin bond strength of a one-bottle universal adhesive containing an amide monomer

One-bottle universal adhesives have been widely used because of their simplicity of bonding procedures for various dental materials. The present study evaluated the effect of the polymerization light source on the micro-tensile bond strengths of a universal adhesive (Clearfil Universal Bond Quick) to dentin in comparison with a one-bottle self-etch adhesive (Clearfil S³ Bond Plus) and two 2-step self-etch adhesives (Clearfil SE Bond and Clearfil SE Bond 2). The adhesives were applied to extracted human dentin according to the manufacturer’s instructions and irradiated using either a quartz-tungsten-halogen (QTH) or blue light-emitting diode (LED). Subsequently, a resin composite was incrementally built on each adhesive and light-cured using the QTH. The bonded specimens were sectioned and subjected to micro-tensile bond strength tests. Both the type of adhesive and the light source were found to statistically affect the bond strength, with no interactions. The LED gave greater bond strength than the QTH. The bond strengths of the two-step adhesives were significantly higher than those of the one-bottle products, irrespective of the light source. The Clearfil Universal Bond Quick exhibited significantly higher bond strength than the Clearfil S³ Bond Plus. LED curing improved the performance of Clearfil Universal Bond Quick, and this product generated bond strength superior to that of the existing one-bottle adhesive Clearfil S³ Bond Plus.     

The bonding effect of adhesive systems and bulk-fill composites to sound and caries-affected dentine

Purpose: To investigate the influence of adhesive type and increment thickness on shear bond strength of flowable bulk-fill resin composites compared with a flowable conventional resin composite, in both sound and caries-affected dentine.

Methods: Shear bond strength was tested in 100 extracted human molars with coronal dentine caries. Half of the teeth were restored with Adper? Easy Bond and the other half with Adper? Single Bond Plus. Bonded surfaces were restored with Filtek? Ultimate Flow and two bulk-fill composites (SDR and X-tra base) (n = 10 teeth for each subgroup). Restorations of 4 mm were performed with incremental or bulk-fill technique. The shear bond was determined and statistically analysed using three-way ANOVA and Bonferroni multiple comparison post hoc tests (p ≤ 0.05). Dentine–resin interfaces were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy.

Results: For both adhesives, the highest shear bond strength values were obtained for sound dentine. In sound dentine, the highest bond strength observed with Easy Bond when used in 2-mm increments of SDR. In caries-affected dentine, Single Bond in combination with SDR displayed significantly lower bond strength.

Conclusion: There was no significant difference in shear bond strength between the incremental and bulk-fill groups for molars with sound dentine when the etch-and-rinse adhesive system was used; however, for the self-etch adhesive system, incremental application caused higher bond strength than bulk application.     

Effect of an Er,Cr:YSGG laser preparation on dentin bond strength of a universal adhesive

The aim of this study was to evaluate the bond strength of a universal adhesive system to dentin prepared with SiC paper or an Er,Cr:YSGG laser using different bonding strategies (etch-and-rinse versus self-etch mode). Ninety-six extracted caries-free, sound human molars were used. The teeth were longitudinally sectioned in the mesiodistal direction and were wet polished with 600-grit SiC paper to obtain a standardized flat dentin surface. All prepared teeth were randomly divided into two groups, according to the surface preparation method: GroupI:an erbium, chromium:yttrium,scandium, gallium, garnet laser; Group II: silicon carbide paper[SiC] (n = 48). Each group was then assigned into three subgroups according to the universal adhesive’s (Single Bond Universal) bonding strategies: (a) etch-and-rinse mode with phosphoric acid, (b) etch-and-rinse mode with a laser, (c) self-etch mode (n = 16). For surface preparation, the Er,Cr:YSGG laser was used at 3 W, 30 Hz with 140 μs pulse duration for 25 s. For etching mode, the laser was used at 1.5 W (60% air, 70% water). Cylinders of composite were fabricated on the bonding area and shear bond strength was determined using a universal testing machine. Failure modes were evaluated using a stereomicroscope. The data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA followed by the Bonferroni test (p < 0.05). Bonding strategies showed statistically significant differences in both the SiC-and laser-prepared groups (p < 0.05).Universal adhesive used in etch-and-rinse mode with acid showed significantly higher bond strength values than in self-etch mode (p < 0.05). The bond strength values did not differ according to the surface preparation method (p > 0.05). Irrespective of preparation method, using universal adhesive in etch-and-rinse mode with acid might improve dentin bond strength. Laser preparation did not affect the bond strength of the universal adhesive tested.     

Effect of Etching Time on Resin-Primary Dentin Adhesion and Degradation of Interfaces

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to evaluate the resin–dentin bond degradation in primary teeth after reducing the etching time. The dentin surfaces were bonded with: an etch and rinse adhesive (single bond-SB); a two step self-etching adhesive (Clearfil self etching bond-CSEB); and a one-step self-etching adhesive (one up bond F-OUB). For half the specimens, the recommended etching time was used (the manufacturer’s instructions); for the other half the etching time was reduced by 50%. The bonded teeth were divided according to different challenging procedures: (a) 24 h storage in distilled water and sectioned into beams (1.0 mm2); (b) immersion of the bonded beams in 10% NaOCl aqueous solution for 5 h; (c) load cycled (5000 cycles, 90 N) and then sectioned into beams. The micro-tensile bond strength (MTBS) was measured and fractographic analysis performed. The data were statistically analyzed using an analysis of variance (ANOVA) technique, together with multiple comparisons tests. The results showed that the OUB produced the lowest MTBS values, regardless of the challenging procedure. After NaOCl immersion, the MTBS decreased in all groups, with the Clearfil self etching bond (immersed for half the time) attained the highest MTBS. Following the instructions for each of the adhesive systems, after load cycling, no differences in MTBS were observed in the samples after 24 h. However when the etching time was shortened, a decrease in MTBS were observed for all groups. In conclusion, shortening the etching/conditioning time caused a significant change to the bond strength which was material dependent. The OUB produced the lowest bond strengths, regardless of other variables; and a reduced conditioning time resulted in an increased bond strength for CSEB adhesive.     

Effects of cavity disinfectants on bond strength of an etch-and-rinse adhesive to water- or ethanol-saturated sound and caries-affected dentin

Objective: To evaluate the effect of cavity disinfectants on the immediate microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of an etch-and-rinse adhesive to water- and ethanol-saturated sound and caries-affected dentin (CAD). Material and Methods: Thirty-six human molars were sectioned to expose 1/3 of the mid-coronal dentin surface. Sound (n = 18) and CAD (n = 18) specimens were divided into six groups each (n = 3): one positive control (sound), one negative control (CAD), and five experimental groups each. In the control group, dentin surfaces were bonded using an etch-and-rinse adhesive with a traditional water-wet bonding technique. In the experimental groups, ozone was applied before etching and chlorhexidine after etching. In the ethanol-wet bonding groups, acid-etched dentin surfaces were treated with ethanol. Following adhesive application and composite buildups, bonded specimens were sectioned to form sticks. Failure modes were analyzed using a stereomicroscope. Results: The water-wet bonded sound control group yielded the highest μTBS among all groups (p < 0.001). The lowest μTBS values were observed in the ozone groups (p < 0.05). The ethanol-wet bonded CAD group exhibited a higher μTBS than the water-wet bonded negative controls. Although compared to the positive control, chlorhexidine decreased the μTBS (p < 0.05), an increase with no significant difference was observed in the negative control (p > 0.05). Conclusions: The μTBS values of CAD were lower than those of sound dentin. Ethanol-wet bonding improved the μTBS of CAD. Ozone application reduced the μTBS in both sound and CAD; chlorhexidine improved the immediate μTBS after etching in CAD.     

Microtensile versus microshear bond strength between dental adhesives and the dentin substrate

This study evaluated the performance of different bonding tests on the bond strength of three adhesive systems to dentin. Forty-eight bovine incisors were used in the study, which were allocated in two groups according to the bond strength test performed: microtensile (µTBS) or microshear (µSBS). Also, each group was divided in three subgroups according to the adhesive system applied: Single Bond (SB), Prime & Bond (PB) and XP Bond (XPB) (n=8). The teeth were prepared according to each bond strength test protocol, and then the specimens were tested in an universal testing machine (EMIC). The data were submitted to two-way ANOVA (bond strength test and adhesive system type factors) and Tukey's post hoc test (α=0.05). The µTBS results were higher for all the adhesives when compared to the µSBS ones. Within the µTBS results, SB showed higher bond strength than PB and XPB, which showed similar adhesive performance among each other; within the µSBS results, all the adhesives presented similar bond strength values to dentin. The µTBS test detected differences between the adhesive systems evaluated; in contrast, the µSBS test was less discriminating in evaluating the adhesive performance of the materials tested.     

Alpha-hydroxy glycolic acid for root dentin etching: Morphological analysis and push out bond strength

The purpose of this study was investigated the use of α-hydroxy glycolic acid as a dentin etchant for adhesive procedures in the root canal. The etching pattern of glycolic acid and mineral content distribution of root canal dentin were assessed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), respectively. The effect of glycolic acid surface etching on the push out bond strength of fiber post to root dentin was assessed using three adhesive systems: Single Bond Universal [SBU], Scotchbond Multipurpose [SBMP], and Ambar [AM]. The 37% phosphoric acid was used as a control group. The bond strength values were statistically compared using ANOVA/Fisher LSD tests (α = 0.05). SEM revealed similar etching patterns for phosphoric acid and glycolic acid. Both acids also shared similar interfacial morphology of the hybrid layer. EDS showed similar levels of Ca and Mg after treatment with glycolic acid when compared with phosphoric acid. When the P level was compared, it was observed that phosphoric acid caused greater removal of P. The push out bond strengths were statistically similar between glycolic acid and phosphoric acid in all groups (p > 0.05). Comparisons using post hoc Fisher LSD test showed that the bond strengths in the SBU and SBMP groups were not significantly different from each other (p > 0.05). The bond strength in the AM group was similar to that in the SBMP group (p > 0.05); however, it was significantly lower than that in the SBU group (p < 0.05). It can be concluded that the glycolic acid effectively etched root dentin surfaces, resulting in a surface pattern, hybrid layer, and push out bond strength similar to those produced by traditional phosphoric acid. Therefore, glycolic acid may be recommended as a suitable root dentin surface etchant for adhesive restorative procedures.     

Effect of zinc chloride added to self-etching primer on bond strength to caries-affected dentin and chemical-physical-mechanical properties of adhesives

The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect over time of zinc chloride (ZnCl₂) incorporated into the primer of a two-step self-etching adhesive system (Clearfil SE Bond, Kuraray - SE) on long-term microtensile bond strength (μTBS) to caries-affected dentin (CAD), and on flexural strength (FS) and conversion degree (CD) of the adhesive. First, the CD of SE with and without 2% (wt) ZnCl₂ solution was evaluated by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). Then, beam-shaped samples (7 mm × 2 mm x 1 mm) were prepared with the SE primer containing the ZnCl₂ solution, to perform flexural strength (FS) tests. For μTBS testing purposes, CAD surfaces were randomly divided into two groups, according to the presence of ZnCl₂ powder (2 wt%) incorporated into the adhesive system (ZnCl₂), or its absence (NT). An additional group consisting of dentin pretreated with a 2% chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX) solution was proposed as a positive control (n = 10). A two-step self-etching system (SE) was applied following the manufacturer's instructions, and restorations of composite resin were built up on the dentin. After 24 h, the resin-dentin blocks were sectioned into specimens that were submitted to μTBS testing immediately following, or after 12 months of water storage (WS). Both μTBS and FS tests were performed using a universal testing machine (0.5 mm/min). FS and CD data were submitted to the Student t-test, and μTBS data were submitted to two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 0.05). ZnCl₂ incorporation had no statistically significant influence on flexural strength (p = 0.88) or conversion degree (p = 566). Regarding μTBS, no significant effect of the double interaction of “dentin treatment” versus “WS period” (p = 0.546) was observed. The bond strength was not affected by the WS period (p = 0.805). The highest mean bond strength was observed for the NT group, which did not differ from the ZnCl₂ group. The lowest mean bond strength was observed for the CHX group, which differed statistically from the NT group (p = 0.053). It was concluded that incorporation of ZnCl₂ into the SE self-etching primer did not interfere in the bond strength of caries-affected dentin, in regard to failure mode, flexural strength or CD, and had no other beneficial effects.     

Effect of 2% chlorhexidine digluconate application and water storage on the bond strength to superficial and deep dentin

The aim of the present in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of chlorhexidine, applied before a self-etching adhesive system (Clearfil SE Bond) on microtensile bond strength to superficial and deep dentin (DD), immediately and after six months of water storage (WS). Forty dentin specimens were divided into two groups according to dentin depth: superficial and deep. The specimens were then divided according to the solution to be applied (n = 10): CLX: 2% chlorhexidine (passively applied for 60 s) and NT (no treatment). A self-etching adhesive system was applied according to the manufactures instructions, with composite restorative placed on the dentin surface. After 24 h, dentin–resin blocks were sectioned into beam-shaped specimens that were submitted to microtensile bond strength testing either immediately or after six months of WS. Data were submitted to three-way ANOVA (α = 0.05). Bond strength values for the deep dentin group were significantly lower than those observed for superficial dentin (SD) (p = 0.002), whether chlorhexidine solution had been applied or not. There was no statistical difference in bond strength for specimens tested after 24 h and 6 months of WS. The application of chlorhexidine did not affect immediate and long-term bond strength to dentin. Bond strength in deep dentin was lower than in SD.     

Influence of chlorhexidine in cavities prepared with ultrasonic or diamond tips on microtensile bond strength

This study evaluated the effect of chlorhexidine (CLX) in cavities prepared with either ultrasound-mounted CVDentUS diamond tips or conventional diamond burs on dentin bond strength after 24 h and 180 days. Forty-eight dentin surfaces from sound third molars were flattened and divided into four groups (n = 12), according to the type of cavity preparation (CVDentUS ultrasound tip or conventional diamond) and with or without 2% CLX (Consepsis) treatment. After application of the adhesive system (Clearfil SE Bond), microhybrid composite resin blocks (Charisma) were made on the dentin surface in increments. After 24 h, the specimens were sectioned into stick-shaped samples with an adhesive interface of approximately 1 mm². From each tooth, half of the sticks were evaluated after 24 h of storage in distilled water and the other half after 180 days, using a universal testing machine. Three-way analysis of variance showed no significant triple interactions (p = 0.722) or double interactions between factors. Higher bond strength values were observed with the use of ultrasonic tips (p = 0.019), irrespective of whether or not CLX was applied in either time period. No difference in bond strength values was observed in terms of CLX application (p = 0.581). No significant difference in bond strength values was shown after storage for 24 h or 180 days (p = 0.302). In conclusion, the ultrasonic tips promoted greater bond strength to dentin, irrespective of whether or not CLX was applied, and storage time.     

Which is effective on bond strength of resin-based sealers: incorporation of powdered dentin to primer or adhesive?

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of adding powdered dentin to primer or adhesive in a self-etch system on the shear bond strength of three resin-based sealers. Seventy-two premolars were sectioned buccolingually, and 144 root halves were divided into three groups according to the sealer used: epoxy resin-based sealer (AH Plus), methacrylate resin-based (RealSeal, Hybrid Root SEAL) n = 48. The surfaces were irrigated with 5% NaOCl, 17% EDTA, distilled water for 5 min. Four subgroups were created (n = 12): control group; Clearfil Liner Bond 2 V treated group; powdered dentin added to the primer of Clearfil Liner Bond 2 V (40 wt.%); and powdered dentin added to the adhesive of Clearfil Liner Bond 2 V (20 wt.%). Dentin powder was prepared. Three mm high buildups with a constant surface area of 3.45 mm² were created using the sealers and allowed to set (37 ºC, 100% humid, 72 h). The samples were tested to failure for shear bond strength (1 mm/min). The data were calculated (MPa) and analyzed using two-way ANOVA, one-way ANOVA, and Tukey HSD tests. Adhesive use decreased the bonding performance of AH Plus (p = 0.00). Mean bond strength of the other sealers was found similar to control. Primer or adhesive resin with powdered dentin did not increase the adhesive performance of the self-etch system used. The shear bond strength of RealSeal was significantly increased when powdered dentin was added to primer or adhesive (p = 0.00). The effect of adding powdered-dentine to primer or adhesive in a self-etch system on the shear bond strength was sealer-dependent .     

Bonding effectiveness of different dentin conditions on etch-and-rinse mode of two universal adhesives: the confocal laser scanning and shear bond strength

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength and the morphological differences of adhesive/dentin interface of two one-step universal adhesives to dentin using different dentin-conditioning methods with etch-and-rinse mode. Ninety-six dentin specimens were randomly divided into two groups based on application of two adhesives and assigned to three subgroups according to different dentin conditioning (wet-bonding; air-dried; rewetting). After etching and rinsing, experimental dentin conditioning was conducted on the etched dentin specimens. All specimens were subjected to shear bond strength testing using a universal testing machine, and all data were statistically analyzed using two- way analysis of variance with Tukey’s post hoc test. All debonded specimens were examined for fracture pattern by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Adjunctively, one specimen per group was prepared by the same processing and longitudinally sectioned. Then, the infiltration ability of adhesives into dentin was examined by observing the interface using confocal laser-scanning microscopy (CLSM). Wet and Rewet groups exhibited significantly higher shear bond strength than dry groups on the etch-and-rinse system, regardless of different adhesives. The bond strength between wet and rewet groups showed no significant difference in Tukey’s test. Analysis of failure surface using SEM showed that predominant failure patterns were mixed in both the wet-bonding group and dry-bonding group. CLSM presented that resin penetration into etched dentin was enhanced similarly in wet and rewet group. Application of rewetting agents on dried dentin increased the bonding performance of universal adhesives on etch-and-rinse mode.     

Microshear bond strength of universal adhesives for use with artificially demineralized enamel,with and without pre-etching

The aim of this study was to investigate the microshear bond strength of five universal adhesives for use with demineralized enamel, with and without pre-etching. Using five universal adhesives (Single Bond Universal (SBU), Clearfil Universal (CU), Prime&Bond Elect Universal (PBU), Bisco All Bond Universal (ABU), Gluma Bond Universal (GU)), composite cylinders were bonded to the labial surfaces of extracted upper incisor teeth, with or without pre-etching. A micro-shear bond strength test was performed. The debonding surfaces were evaluated with the use of SEM. The data was analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s Post-hoc tests. SBU, ABU, and PBU increased the bond strength statistically when used in etch&rinse mode (p?<?0.05). GU and CU did not change the bond strength statistically with the use of pre-etching (p?>?0.05). The bond strength of universal adhesives on demineralized enamel, with and without initial acid etching, depends on the type of adhesive system used.     

Influence of phosphoric acid etching on the dentin bond durability of universal adhesives

This study aimed to compare the microshear bond strength (MSBS) of three universal adhesives and a three-step conventional adhesive to dentin after 24-hour and one-year storage in water. A new fluoride-releasing universal adhesive (Clearfil Universal Bond Quick: CUQ) and two commercially available adhesives (ScotchBond Universal: SBU and All-Bond Universal: ABU) were evaluated with phosphoric acid etching (PA-etch mode) or without it (self-etch mode). All-Bond 3 (AB3) served as control group. After bonding composite cylinders to dentin discs obtained from caries-free human teeth, the specimens were stored in deionized water at 37?°C for either 24 hours or one year (n?=?14) before MSBS measurement. Two-way ANOVA analysis of the results showed that the adhesives, storage time and their interactions had a significant effect on MSBS (p?<?0.01). In self-etch mode, there was no significant difference among universal adhesives at the baseline. In PA-etch, the CUQ and SBU showed significantly higher MSBS compared with AB3 (p?<?0.05). At baseline, no difference was found between the two modes for each universal adhesive (p?>?0.05). After one year, CUQ in self-etch mode showed a slight increase in nominal MSBS (p?>?0.05) and Weibull characteristic strength, which was significantly higher than SBU and ABU in the corresponding mode. There was no difference among the three universal adhesives in PA-etch mode after one year (p?>?0.05). In conclusion, the durability and reliability of dentin bonding with universal adhesives in different application modes depended on the material; and the self-etch approach showed promising results for the tested fluoride-releasing universal adhesive.     

Effect of different dentin adhesives and application modes on sealing ability of amalgam restorations

Purpose: The aim of the study was to evaluate the sealing ability of bonded amalgam restorations using different adhesive materials with different adhesive application methods including amalgam bonding application. Materials and methods: The prepared Class-V cavities were randomly assigned to four application groups of four tested dual-curing dentin adhesives (Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus, XP Bond, Xeno IV and Clearfil Liner Bond 2V), dual-curing resin-based cement (Panavia F2.0) and a control group (unlined amalgam). Group 1 adhesives were applied according to the instructions for direct light-curing, Group 2 chemical-curing mode was applied according to the manufacturer’s amalgam bonding instructions. Group 3 adhesives were first applied in light-curing mode, and then amalgam bonding adhesive was applied. Group 4 adhesives were first applied in chemical-curing mode, followed immediately by light-curing mode. After that, amalgam adhesive parts were applied; then, the amalgam was condensed and carved. After storage for 24 h in distilled water at 37 °C, restorations were finished and polished. The teeth were then thermocycled (500 cycles between 5 and 55 °C), and the specimens were examined for microleakage using methylene blue as a marker. Results: Compared to the control group, the adhesive application modes significantly reduced microleakage for both dentin and enamel margins (p < 0.05). In dentin margins of the adhesives tested, Group 4 showed the lowest leakage score. On the enamel margins for Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus and XP Bond, Group 1 showed the highest microleakage (p < 0.05). Conclusion: According to marginal sealing ability and ease of application, Group 2 was recommended for the etch and rinse systems, and Group 4 was also recommended for the self-etch systems under amalgam restorations.     

Influence of Dentin Smear Layer Created by Chemo-Mechanical or Bur Excavation Methods on Adhesion of Self-Etching Primers and a Conventional Adhesive

This study evaluated the influence of chemo-mechanical or bur excavation methods on bond strength of dentin bonding agents, micromorphology of the treated-dentin surfaces, and the bonded interfaces. Smear layer-free surfaces were used as control. The methods of cavity preparation (chemo-mechanical and rotary burs) were used under specific parameters and four commercial dentin bonding agents (three two-step self-etching primers and one “etch-and-rinse” adhesive system) were applied to treated surfaces, according to manufacturers' instructions. Composite blocks were built on bonded surfaces and restored teeth were vertically, serially sectioned to obtain bonded slices for interfacial micromorphologic analysis or to produce beam specimens for micro-tensile bond testing. A clear difference of the preparation of dentin surfaces and formation of hybrid layer and resin tags are noted. The use of burs or chemo-mechanical methods did not affect the bond strength for etch-and-rinse system and for a self-etching primer with a very low pH (0.5). However, dentin surface preparations decreased the bond strength for the milder versions (pH of around 2) of self-etching adhesive systems. The manner of dentin preparation prior to bonding procedures can influence the effectiveness of some self-etching primers, which dissolve the smear layer and dentin surface only partially.     

Effect of 2% chlorhexidine gluconate cavity disinfectant on microtensile bond strength of tooth-coloured restorative materials to sound and caries-affected dentin

This study evaluated the effect of 2% chlorhexidine gluconate-based cavity disinfectant (CHX) on the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of glass ionomer, resin-modified glass ionomer and packable resin composite to sound and caries-affected dentin. Sound and occlusal caries-affected human third molars (N?=?36, n?=?3 per group) were randomly divided into three experimental groups to receive one of the following restorative materials. (a) Glass ionomer (Ketac Molar, 3 M ESPE; GI), (b) resin-modified glass ionomer (Vitremer, 3 M ESPE; RMGI) and (c) packable resin composite (Surefil, Dentsply; PRC) with a bonding agent (Prime Bond NT, Dentsply De Trey). Caries was removed using a caries-detecting dye (Caries Detector, Kuraray Medical Ltd.) and flat dentin surfaces were achieved by finishing up to 1200-grit silicon carbide abrasive. Half of the teeth in each group received 2% CHX (Consepsis, Ultradent). Dentin surfaces were built-up with the respective materials incrementally and were sectioned with a slow-speed saw into multiple beams. The beams were subjected to μTBS test (0.5 mm/min) in a Universal Testing Machine. The data were analysed using two-way analysis of variance and Tukey’s tests. For each restorative material, μTBS results were not affected by the application of CHX (p?>?0.05) on both sound and caries-affected dentin (p?>?0.05). PRC in combination with the corresponding bonding agent showed significantly higher results (p?<?0.05) than those of GI and RMGI, on sound and caries-affected teeth, respectively. Cohesive failure in dentin was not observed in any of the groups. The use of 2% chlorhexidine-based cavity disinfectant did not impair the adhesion of the restorative materials tested to either sound or caries-affected dentin.