The dependability of alliance assessments: The alliance–outcome correlation is larger than you might think.

Objective: To examine the dependability of alliance scores at the patient and therapist level, to evaluate the potential causal direction of session-to-session changes in alliance and depressive symptoms, and to investigate the impact of aggregating the alliance over progressively more sessions on the size of the alliance–outcome relationship. Method: We used data from a study (N = 45 patients; N = 9 therapists) of psychotherapy for major depressive disorder in which the alliance was measured at every treatment session to calculate generalizability coefficients and to predict change in depressive symptoms from alliance scores. Two replication samples were also used. Results: At the therapist level, a large number of patients (about 60) per therapist is needed to provide a dependable therapist-level alliance score. At the patient level, generalizability coefficients revealed that a single assessment of the alliance is only marginally acceptable. Very good (>.90) dependability at the patient level is only achieved through aggregating 4 or more assessments of the alliance. Session-to-session change in the alliance predicted subsequent session-to-session changes in symptoms. Evidence for reverse causation was found in later-in-treatment sessions, suggesting that only aggregates of early treatment alliance scores should be used to predict outcome. Session 3 alliance scores explained 4.7% of outcome variance, but the average of Sessions 3–9 explained 14.7% of outcome variance. Conclusion: Adequate assessment of the alliance using multiple patients per therapist and at least 4 treatment sessions is crucial for fully understanding the size of the alliance–outcome relationship. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2011 APA, all rights reserved)     

Alliance predicts patients' outcome beyond in-treatment change in symptoms.

The authors examined the relations among therapeutic alliance, outcome, and early-in-treatment symptomatic improvement in a group of 86 patients with generalized anxiety disorders, chronic depression, or avoidant or obsessive–compulsive personality disorder who received supportive–expressive dynamic psychotherapy. Although alliance at Sessions 5 and 10, but not at Session 2, was associated with prior change in depression, alliance at all sessions significantly predicted subsequent change in depression when prior change in depression was partialed out. The results are discussed in terms of the causal role of the alliance in therapeutic outcome. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

The therapeutic context: Preconditions for change in psychotherapy.

Discusses 4 aspects of therapeutic context: therapeutic alliance, client's expectations of change, treatment rationale, and therapeutic impact. To illustrate the central role of the therapeutic context in treatment outcome, a clinical case is discussed in which systematic desensitization was used to treat a choking phobia. Throughout the therapy process, there was minimal client collaboration and the treatment failed to produce any symptom change. However, significant improvement did occur subsequent to an event high in therapeutic impact that provided a plausible treatment rationale to the client, increased the client's expectation of change, and established a therapeutic alliance. This case illustrates the importance of relationship and context in psychotherapeutic change. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Analysis of the development of the working alliance using hierarchical linear modeling.

The relation between the working alliance and therapeutic outcome was examined in 21 therapist–client dyads. This relation was analyzed in terms of the level of alliance at the 3rd counseling session, midpoint of treatment, and last session with linear and curvilinear models of the temporal development of the working alliance. Analyses were conducted with hierarchical linear modeling. Results revealed a significant association between the linear growth function on therapist ratings of the working alliance and therapeutic outcome. The use of hierarchical linear modeling in counseling psychology research and the need for conceptualizing the working alliance as a temporally variant as opposed to a static process are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

The therapeutic alliance in adolescent substance abuse treatment: A one-with-many analysis.

Studies of the therapeutic alliance typically use a one-with-many (OWM) design in which each therapist (the one) treats multiple clients (the many). This study used Kenny, Kashy, and Cook's (2006) OWM method to examine the composition of the therapeutic alliance and to analyze the association between alliance and outcome in a sample of 398 adolescents treated for substance abuse by 14 therapists. Both the client and therapist alliance ratings yielded large relationship variances, with limited consensus among clients treated by the same therapist about the quality of the alliance. If a client reported an especially strong alliance with his or her therapist, the therapist was likely to also report an especially strong alliance with that client (dyadic reciprocity). The association between the components of the alliance and treatment outcome was complicated, with different levels of measurement and different components of the alliance (perceiver, partner, or relationship) derived from different informants (therapist or client) relating to different outcomes. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2011 APA, all rights reserved)     

Cognitive change and the therapeutic alliance: The role of technical and nontechnical factors in cognitive therapy.

Tests whether there are reciprocal interactions between the technical and nontechnical aspects of cognitive therapy (CT). 47 outpatients (mean age 36.8 yrs) with a depressive and/or anxiety disorder were treated with a 20-week, manualized CT intervention. Measures included the Beck Depression Inventory, the Dysfunctional Attitude Scale, and the Working Alliance Inventory. Results indicate that pretreatment depressogenic cognitions impact on the ability to form an early therapeutic alliance, whereas pretreatment depression severity is unrelated to alliance formation. Second, the degree to which patients were in agreement with the goals and tasks of therapy was predictive of subsequent change in depressogenic cognitions. Third, the 2-way interaction between the therapeutic bond and cognitive-change scores was found to predict depression outcomes: patients who reported a better therapeutic bond and who experienced greater reduction in their depressogenic cognitions, experienced the most favorable clinical outcomes. Certain aspects of the therapeutic alliance (i.e., goals and tasks) may facilitate the implementation of the technical factors of CT, while other aspects of the alliance (i.e., bond) act in concert with technical factors to produce direct effects on depressed symptoms. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Follow-up findings for interpretive and supportive forms of psychotherapy and patient personality variables.

Follow-up findings at 6 and 12 months are reported for a clinical trial that investigated the efficacy of interpretive and supportive forms of short-term individual psychotherapy and the interaction of each form with the patient's quality of object relations (QOR) and psychological mindedness (PM). Patients in both forms maintained their posttherapy improvements at 6- and 12-month follow-up assessments. They did not differ significantly from each other. At 6 and 12 months, there was evidence for a direct relation between QOR and favorable outcome. At 12 months, there was also evidence for an interaction effect, which indicated a direct relation between QOR and favorable outcome for interpretive therapy and almost no relation for supportive therapy. Thus, QOR continued to be an important predictor of outcome at 6 and 12 months, with some evidence for persistence of an interaction effect. In contrast, no follow-up effects were found for PM. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

The alliance as mediator of expectancy effects in short-term individual therapy.

The authors investigated the hypothesis that the therapeutic alliance mediates the relationship between pretherapy expectancy of improvement and psychotherapy outcome. Data were drawn from a comparative trial of 2 forms of short-term, time-limited individual psychotherapy (W. E. Piper, A. S. Joyce. M. McCallum, & H. F. Azim, 1998). Measures of expectancy and outcome were based on an individualized assessment of target objectives; outcome was considered from 3 perspectives (patient, independent assessor, therapist). Using the R. M. Baron and D. A. Kenny (1986) procedure, the authors, found evidence in support of the hypothesized mediation effect. The effect was evident when the alliance was rated from the perspective of either patient or therapist, and it accounted for one third of the direct impact of expectancy on outcome. Clinical implications and limitations of the study are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Therapeutic alliance as a predictor of outcome and retention in the National Institute on Drug Abuse Collaborative Cocaine Treatment Study.

The authors examined the relation between therapeutic alliance, retention, and outcome for 308 cocaine-dependent outpatients participating in the National Institute on Drug Abuse Collaborative Cocaine Treatment Study. High levels of alliance were observed in supportive–expressive therapy (SE), cognitive therapy (CT), and individual drug counseling (IDC), and alliance levels increased slightly but significantly from Session 2 to Session 5 in all groups. In contrast to other studies, alliance was not a significant predictor of drug outcome. However, alliance did predict patient retention differentially across the 3 treatments. In SE and IDC, either higher levels of alliance were associated with increased retention or no relationship between alliance and retention was found, depending on the time alliance was measured. In CT, higher levels of alliance were associated with decreased retention. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Optimal levels of emotional arousal in experiential therapy of depression.

Objective: To determine the relationship between length of time spent expressing highly aroused emotion and therapeutic outcome. Method: Thirty-eight clients (14 male, 24 female) between the ages of 22 and 60 years (M = 39.5, SD = 9.71), treated for depression with experiential therapy, were rated on working alliance and expressed emotional arousal (with the Client Expressed Emotional Arousal Scale) in their three highest arousal sessions. Among the clients, 34 were of European ethnicity, 2 were of Asian ethnicity, 1 was of Latino ethnicity, and 1 was of Caribbean–Canadian ethnicity. Clients were administered the short form of the Working Alliance Inventory following their 4th therapy session and also completed, pre- and posttherapy, the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), the Global Severity Index (GSI) of the Symptom Checklist–90–Revised (SCL-90-R), the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems, and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Results: Hierarchical regressions showed that a nonlinear pattern of expressed emotional arousal predicted outcome significantly above the alliance. This combination predicted 30% of outcome variance on the BDI and 24% on the GSI (p     

Effects of transference work in the context of therapeutic alliance and quality of object relations.

Objective: Transference interpretation is considered as a core active ingredient in dynamic psychotherapy. In common clinical theory, it is maintained that more mature relationships, as well as a strong therapeutic alliance, may be prerequisites for successful transference work. In this study, the interaction between quality of object relations, transference interpretation, and alliance is estimated. Method: One hundred outpatients seeking psychotherapy for depression, anxiety, and personality disorders were randomly assigned to 1 year of weekly sessions of dynamic psychotherapy with transference interpretation or to the same type and duration of treatment, but without the use of transference interpretation. Quality of Object Relations (QOR)–lifelong pattern was evaluated before treatment (P. H?glend, 1994). The Working Alliance Inventory (A. O. Horvath & L. S. Greenberg, 1989; T. J. Tracey & A. M. Kokotovic, 1989) was rated in Session 7. The primary outcome variable was the Psychodynamic Functioning Scales (P. H?glend et al., 2000), measured at pretreatment, posttreatment, and 1 year after treatment termination. Results: A significant Treatment Group × Quality of Object Relations × Alliance interaction was present, indicating that alliance had a significantly different impact on effects of transference interpretation, depending on the level of QOR. The impact of transference interpretation on psychodynamic functioning was more positive within the context of a weak therapeutic alliance for patients with low quality of object relations. For patients with more mature object relations and high alliance, the authors observed a negative effect of transference work. Conclusion: The specific effects of transference work was influenced by the interaction of object relations and alliance, but in the direct opposite direction of what is generally maintained in mainstream clinical theory. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2011 APA, all rights reserved)     

Therapeutic alliance and outcome: Impact of treatment length and pretreatment symptomatology.

Studied data collected in 1978–1982 in a research project at a university psychological clinic that provides low-cost services to families in the community. Data consisted of pre- and posttherapy written measures and audiotapes from selected sessions with 40 patients (aged 20–57 yrs). Findings indicate that (1) strength of therapeutic alliance was established within the 1st 3 sessions of therapy with little change over the course of therapy, (2) short length therapy cases had lower levels of therapist positive alliance, (3) therapeutic alliance was predictive of outcome, and (4) therapeutic alliance was adversely affected by pretreatment symptomatology. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Therapeutic Alliance and Treatment Adherence in Two Interventions for Bulimia Nervosa: A Study of Process and Outcome.

The relationship between therapeutic alliance, therapist adherence to treatment protocol, and outcome was analyzed in a randomized trial of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and interpersonal psychotherapy for bulimia nervosa. Independent observers rated audiotapes of full-length therapy sessions. Purging frequency was the primary outcome variable. There were no significant therapist or Therapist × Treatment effects on outcome. Although results showed high levels of alliance and adherence across treatments, CBT was associated with greater adherence. Across treatments and time points, better adherence was associated with enhanced alliance. Treatment condition and baseline purging frequency, but not adherence, predicted outcome. Early alliance predicted posttreatment purging frequency. In temporal analyses, prior symptom change assessed early in treatment was significantly related to subsequent adherence at midtreatment. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Interpersonal complementarity and the therapeutic alliance: A study of relationship in psychotherapy.

Examined the relationship between the therapeutic alliance and interpersonal complementarity during the early stage of psychotherapy. 36 pairs of patients (aged 18–57 yrs) and therapists from 14 outpatient settings recorded their perceptions of their therapeutic alliance, using a working alliance inventory, and rated each other's therapy behaviors on the Checklist of Interpersonal Transactions. There were positive associations between patient–therapist interpersonal complementarity and both patients' and therapists' perceptions of the alliance. The more extreme/abnormal the patient's interpersonal behavior, the more both patient and therapist perceived a less positive working alliance. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

The alliance in couple therapy: Partner influence, early change, and alliance patterns in a naturalistic sample.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between the alliance and outcome in couple therapy and examine whether the alliance predicted outcomes over and above early change. The authors also investigated partner influence and gender and sought to identify couple alliance patterns that predicted couple outcomes. Method: The authors examined the alliances and outcomes at posttreatment and follow-up of 250 couples seeking treatment for marital distress in a naturalistic setting. The Session Rating Scale was used to measure the alliance; the Outcome Rating Scale and Locke Wallace Marital Adjustment Scale were used to measure outcomes. Couples were White, Euro-Scandinavian, and heterosexual, with a mean age of 38.5 years and average number of years together of 11.8. On a subsample (n = 118) that included couples with 4 or more sessions, the authors investigated the relationship between the alliance and outcome controlling for early change, and patterns of alliance development were delineated. Results: In the full sample, first-session alliances were not predictive of outcomes, but last-session alliances were predictive for both individuals and their partners. In the subsample, third-session alliances predicted outcome significantly above early change (d = 0.25) that exceeded the reliable change index. Couple alliances that started over the mean and increased were associated with significantly more couples achieving reliable or clinically significant change. Gender influences were mixed. Conclusions: Given the current findings suggesting a potential alliance impact over and above symptom relief as well as the importance of ascending alliance scores, continuous assessment of the alliance appears warranted. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Therapeutic alliance and clinical outcome in the NIMH Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program: Preliminary findings.

Investigated the effect of the therapeutic alliance on clinical outcome in the 7 most improved and 7 least improved cases in the 4 treatments investigated in a study (I. Elkin et al; see PA, Vols 72:20648 and 77:10249) of treatment of depression. The treatments were interpersonal therapy (IPT), cognitive-behavior therapy, imipramine plus clinical management, and placebo plus clinical management. Clinical observer ratings of alliance, using Vanderbilt Therapeutic Alliance Total Scale scores, were compared across and within treatment groups and were related to clinical status at termination. Despite selective, significant relationships between alliance and outcome across treatments, the alliance–outcome relationship was significant only for IPT within treatments. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Repairing alliance ruptures.

In this article, we review the existing empirical research on the topic of therapeutic alliance ruptures in psychotherapy. Ruptures in the therapeutic alliance are defined as episodes of tension or breakdown in the collaborative relationship between patient and therapist. Two meta-analyses were conducted. The first reviewed studies examining the relation between rupture-repair episodes and treatment outcome (r = .24, z = 3.06, 95% CI [.09, .39], p = .002, k = 3, N = 148). The second meta-analysis reviewed the research examining the impact on treatment outcome of training therapists in the use of alliance rupture intervention principles (prepost r = .65, z = 5.56, 95% CI [.46, .78], p k = 8, N = 376). Both meta-analyses provided promising evidence regarding the relevance of alliance rupture-repair processes to therapeutic outcome. The limitations of the research reviewed are discussed as well as practice implications for repairing the inevitable alliance ruptures in psychotherapy. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2011 APA, all rights reserved)     

Alliance in two telephone-administered treatments: Relationship with depression and health outcomes.

The present study examined the relationship between therapeutic alliance and both depression and health outcomes in a randomized clinical trial of 2 telephone-administered treatments with 97 clients with multiple sclerosis (MS). The 16-week, manualized treatments compared were telephone-administered cognitive-behavioral therapy (T-CBT) and telephone-administered supportive emotion focused therapy (T-SEFT), an experiential treatment. Alliance scores were significantly higher in T-CBT compared with T-SEFT, and treatment moderated the relationship between alliance and outcome on some of the measures. Specifically, alliance predicted subsequent improvements in depression within the T-CBT condition, but not in T-SEFT, controlling for early symptom change. The authors found a similar trend for alliance and MS-related disability in T-CBT only. This is one of the first studies to examine the role of alliance in outcome for the emerging modality of telephone therapy and one of the few to relate alliance to health outcomes. The findings suggest that the therapist-client relationship is important to improvement in telephone therapy and that the role of alliance in outcome may vary by treatment approach. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Client interpersonal and cognitive styles as predictors of response to time-limited cognitive therapy for depression.

This study examined the relationship between cognitive and interpersonal styles and outcome among 24 clients who received time-limited cognitive therapy for depression. The authors hypothesized that this relationship would be mediated by therapeutic alliance. They found that clients' interpersonal style, particularly an underinvolved style, was predictive of treatment outcome. As predicted, the impact of this style on outcome was mediated through the therapeutic alliance. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

The role of the therapeutic alliance in psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy outcome: Findings in the National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program.

The relationship between therapeutic alliance and treatment outcome was examined for depressed outpatients who received interpersonal psychotherapy, cognitive-behavior therapy, imipramine with clinical management, or placebo with clinical management. Clinical raters scored videotapes of early, middle, and late therapy sessions for 225 cases (619 sessions). Outcome was assessed from patients' and clinical evaluators' perspectives and from depressive symptomatology. Therapeutic alliance was found to have a significant effect on clinical outcome for both psychotherapies and for active and placebo pharmacotherapy. Ratings of patient contribution to the alliance were significantly related to treatment outcome; ratings of therapist contribution to the alliance and outcome were not significantly linked. These results indicate that the therapeutic alliance is a common factor with significant influence on outcome. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)