Rheological properties and morphology of compatibilized poly(butylene terephthalate)/linear low‐density polyethylene alloy

The rheological behavior of PBT/LLDPE and PBT/LLDPE‐g‐AA blends [where PBT is poly(butylene terephthalate), LLDPE is linear low‐density polyethylene, and AA is acrylic acid] under a capillary flow was investigated with a capillary rheometer. The Utracki equation was used to describe the viscosity–composition dependence of PBT/LLDPE and PBT/LLDPE‐g‐AA blends at low shear stresses. However, at high shear stresses, this equation was not suitable for these blending systems. There existed a maximum on the curves of the entrance pressure drop versus the blending compositions, and the interlayer slip factor β in the Utracki equation was related not only to the shear stress but also to the elasticity difference of the two blending components. Morphological observations indicated that at high shear rates, there existed two different morphologies at different positions of the extrudates, and this was the reason that the Utracki equation failed. Near the wall of the capillary, low‐viscosity PBT stratified, and this resulted in an additional decrease in the viscosities of the blending systems. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 88: 206–213, 2003     

Thermal properties and morphology of noncrosslinking linear low‐density polyethylene‐grafted acrylic acid

Noncrosslinking linear low‐density polyethylene‐grafted acrylic acid (LLDPE‐g‐AA) was prepared by melt‐reactive extrusion in our laboratory. The thermal behavior of LLDPE‐g‐AA was investigated by using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). Compared with neat linear low‐density polyethylene (LLDPE), melting temperature (T_m) of LLDPE‐g‐AA increased a little, the crystallization temperature (T_c) increased about 4°C, and the melting enthalpy (ΔH_m) decreased with an increase in acrylic acid content. Isothermal crystallization kinetics of LLDPE and LLDPE‐g‐AA samples were carried out by using DSC. The overall crystallization rate of LLDPE was smaller than that of grafted samples. It showed that the grafted acrylic acid monomer onto LLDPE acted as a nucleating agent. Crystal morphologies of LLDPE‐g‐AA and LLDPE were examined by using SEM. Spherulite sizes of LLDPE‐g‐AA samples were lower than that of LLDPE. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 86: 2626–2630, 2002     

Effect of perfluoroalkylmethacrylate ester‐grafted‐linear low‐density polyethylene on the tribological property of polyoxymethylene–linear low‐density polyethylene composites

In this work, perfluoroalkylmethacrylate ester (PFAMAE)‐grafted‐linear low‐density polyethylene (LLDPE) was synthesized by UV‐induced surface graft polymerization. The effect of PFAMAE‐grafted‐LLDPE on the tribological behavior of LLDPE‐filled polyoxymethylene (POM) composite was investigated using a friction and abrasion testing machine. The results showed that LLDPE‐g‐PFAMAE was a more effective modifier in improving tribological property of LLDPE‐filled POM composite than conventional maleic anhydride‐grafted‐polyethylene (PE‐g‐MAH). POM/LLDPE composite possessed much lower friction coefficient but higher wear rate than pristine POM. The incorporation of LLDPE‐g‐PFAMAE into POM/LLDPE further decreased the friction coefficient, which was 45% lower than that of POM. The wear rate of POM/LLDPE/LLDPE‐g‐PFAMAE composite was also reduced and was lower than that of pristine POM. The primary wear mechanisms of POM/LLDPE composite with and without LLDPE‐g‐PFAMAE were adhesive and abrasive wear. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2011. © 2011 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Structure and oxygen‐barrier properties of (linear low‐density polyethylene/ethylene–vinyl alcohol copolymer)/linear low‐density polyethylene composite films prepared by microlayer coextrusion

Ethylene–vinyl alcohol copolymer (EVOH) and linear low‐density polyethylene (LLDPE) blends with 5% LLDPE grafted with 1% maleic anhydride (MAH; EVOH/LLDPE/LLDPE‐g‐MAH), created to increase the interfacial compatibility, were coextruded with pure LLDPE through the microlayer coextrusion technology. The phase morphology and gas‐barrier properties of the alternating‐layered (EVOH/LLDPE/LLDPE‐g‐MAH)/LLDPE composites were studied by scanning electron microscopy observation and oxygen permeation coefficient measurement. The experimental results show that the EVOH/LLDPE/LLDPE‐g‐MAH and LLDPE layers were parallel to each other, and the continuity of each layer was clearly evident. This structure greatly decreased the oxygen permeability coefficient compared to the pure LLDPE and the barrier percolation threshold because of the existence of the LLDPE/EVOH/LLDPE‐g‐MAH blend layers, and the LLDPE layers diluted the concentration of EVOH in the whole composites. In addition, the effects of the layer thickness ratio of the EVOH/LLDPE/LLDPE‐g‐MAH and LLDPE layers and the layer number on the barrier properties of the layered composites were investigated. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015 , 132, 42211.     

Thermal properties and morphology of recycled poly(ethylene terephthalate)/maleic anhydride grafted linear low‐density polyethylene blends

Properties of recycled Poly(ethylene terephthalate) were greatly improved. Recycled PET was blended with LLDPE‐g‐MA by low‐temperature solid‐state extrusion. Mechanical properties of the blends were affected obviously by the added LLDPE‐g‐MA. Elongation at break reaches 352.8% when the blend contains 10 wt % LLDPE‐g‐MA. Crystallization behavior of PET phase was affected by LLDPE‐g‐MA content. Crystallinity of PET decreased with the increase of LLDPE‐g‐MA content. FTIR testified that maleic anhydride group in LLDPE‐g‐MA reacted with the end hydroxyl groups of PET and PET‐co‐LLDPE‐g‐MA copolymers were in situ synthesized. SEM micrographs display that LLDPE‐g‐MA phase and PET phase are incompatible and the compatibility of the blends can be improved by the forming of PET‐co‐LLDPE‐g‐MA copolymer. LLDPE‐g‐MA content was less, the LLDPE‐g‐MA phase dispersed in PET matrix fine. With the increase of LLDPE‐g‐MA content, the morphology of dispersed LLDPE‐g‐MA phase changed from spherule to cigar bar, then to irregular spherule. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Morphology,structure, and rheological property of linear low‐density polyethylene grafted with acrylic acid

The chain structure, spherulite morphology, and rheological property of LLDPE‐g‐AA were studied by using electronspray mass spectroscopy, ¹³C–NMR, and rheometer. Experimental evidence proved that AA monomers grafted onto the LLDPE backbone formed multiunit AA branch chains. It was found that AA branch chains could hinder movement of the LLDPE main chain during crystallization. Spherulites of LLDPE became more anomalous because of the presence of AA branch chains. Rheological behavior showed that AA branch chains could act as an inner plasticizer at the temperature range of 170–200°C, which made LLDPE‐g‐AA easy to further process. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 80: 2538–2544, 2001     

Influence of high density polyethylene‐g‐maleic anhydride on compatibility and properties of poly(butylene terephthalate)/high density polyethylene blends

Poly(butylene terephthalate)/high density polyethylene (PBT/HDPE) blends and PBT/HDPE‐grafted maleic anhydride (PBT/HDPE‐g‐MAH) blends were prepared by the reactive extrusion approach, and the effect of blend compositions on the morphologies and properties of PBT/HDPE blends and PBT/HDPE‐g‐MAH blends was studied in detail. The results showed that flexural strength, tensile strength, and notched impact strength of PBT/HDPE blends decreased with the addition of HDPE, and flexural strength and tensile strength of PBT/HDPE‐g‐MAH blends decreased, while the notched impact strength of PBT/HDPE‐g‐MAH increased with the addition of HDPE‐g‐MAH. Compared with PBT/HDPE blends, the dimension of the dispersed phase particles in PBT/HDPE‐g‐MAH blends was decreased and the interfacial adhesion was increased. On the other hand, the effects of HDPE and HDPE‐g‐MAH contents on the crystalline and the rheological properties of the blends were also investigated. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 102: 6081–6087, 2006     

Linear low‐density polyethylene/(soya powder) blends containing polyethylene‐g‐(maleic anhydride) as a compatibilizer

Blends were made from linear low‐density polyethylene (LLDPE) and various amounts of soya powder. The soya powder content was varied from 5 to 20 wt%. Polyethylene‐g‐(maleic anhydride) (PE‐g‐MA) was used as a compatibilizer. Tensile strength and elongation at break (EB) decreased with increasing soya powder content. However, Young's modulus increased with the incorporation of soya powder. The addition of PE‐g‐MA as a compatibilizer increased the tensile strength, EB, and modulus of the blends. The interfacial adhesion between soya powder and LLDPE was improved by the incorporation of PE‐g‐MA, as demonstrated by scanning electron microscopy. Increasing the content of soya powder reduced the crystallinity of the LLDPE phase. The addition of PE‐g‐MA had no significant effect on melting temperature, but the degree of crystallinity of the LLDPE was increased. The thermal stability of the blends was determined by using thermogravimetric analysis. Thermal stability decreased with increasing soya powder loading. However, the addition of PE‐g‐MA slightly increased the thermal stability of LLDPE/(soya powder) blends. J. VINYL ADDIT. TECHNOL., 2009. © 2009 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Properties of uncompatibilized and compatibilized poly(butylene terephthalate)–LLDPE blends

In this work, blends of poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT) and linear low‐density polyethylene (LLDPE) were prepared. LLDPE was used as an impact modifier. Since the system was found to be incompatible, compatibilization was sought for by the addition of the following two types of functionalized polyethylene: ethylene vinylacetate copolymer (EVA) and maleic anhydride‐grafted EVA copolymer (EVA‐g‐MAH). The effects of the compatibilizers on the rheological and mechanical properties of the blends have been also quantitatively investigated. The impact strength of the PBT–LLDPE binary blends slightly increased at a lower concentration of LLDPE but increased remarkably above a concentration of 60 wt % of LLDPE. The morphology of the blends showed that the LLDPE particles had dispersed in the PBT matrix below 40 wt % of LLDPE, while, at 60 wt % of LLDPE, a co‐continuous morphology was obtained, which could explain the increase of the impact strength of the blend. Generally, the mechanical strength was decreased by adding LLDPE to PBT. Addition of EVA or EVA‐g‐MAH as a compatibilizer to PBT–LLDPE (70/30) blend considerably improved the impact strength of the blend without significantly sacrificing the tensile and the flexural strength. More improvement in those mechanical properties was observed in the case of the EVA‐g‐MAH system than for the EVA system. A larger viscosity increase was also observed in the case of the EVA‐g‐MAH than EVA. This may be due to interaction of the EVA‐g‐MAH with PBT. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 72: 989–997, 1999     

Influence of branching characteristics on thermal and mechanical properties of Ziegler–Natta and metallocene hexene linear low‐density polyethylene blends with low‐density polyethylene

The effect of the branch content (BC) and composition distribution (CD) of linear low‐density polyethylene (LLDPE) on the thermal and mechanical properties of its blends with LDPE were studied. All blends and pure resins were conditioned in a Haake PolyDrive blender at 190°C and in the presence of adequate amounts of antioxidant. Two metallocene LLDPEs (m‐LLDPE) and one Ziegler–Natta (ZN) hexene LLDPE were melt blended with the same LDPE. The effect of the BC was investigated by blending two hexene m‐LLDPEs of similar weight‐average molecular weights and molecular weight distributions but different BCs with the same LDPE. The effect of the CD was studied by using a ZN and an m‐LLDPE with similar weight‐average molecular weights, BCs, and comonomer type. Low‐BC m‐LLDPE blends showed separate crystallization whereas cocrystallization was observed in the high‐BC m‐LLDPE‐rich blends. However, ZN‐LLDPE/LDPE blends showed separate crystallization together with a third population of cocrystals. The influence of the crystallization behavior was reflected in the mechanical properties. The BC influenced the modulus, ultimate tensile strength, and toughness. The addition of a small amount of LDPE to a low‐BC m‐LLDPE resulted in a major improvement in the toughness, whereas the results for the high‐BC pair followed the additivity rule. ZN‐LLDPE blends with LDPE blends were found to be more compatible and exhibited superior mechanical properties compared to m‐LLDPE counterparts with the same weight‐average molecular weight and BC. All mechanical properties of ZN‐LLDPE blends follow the linear rule of mixtures. However, the CD had a stronger influence on the mechanical properties in comparison to the BC. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 97: 2488–2498, 2005     

Mechanical properties and morphology of polylactide,linear low‐density polyethylene,and their blends

Melt blending of linear low density polyethylene (LLDPE) and polylactide (PLA) was performed in an extrusion mixer with post extrusion blown film attachment with and without compatibilizer‐grafted low density polyethylene maleic anhydride. The blend compositions were optimized for tensile properties as per ASTM D 882‐91. On the basis of this, LLDPE 80 [80 wt % LLDPE and 20 wt % poly(L ‐lactic acid) (PLLA)] and MA‐g‐low‐density polyethylene 80/4 (80 wt % LLDPE, 20 wt % PLLA, and 4 phr compatibilizer) were found to be an optimum composition. The blends were characterized according to their mechanical, thermal, and morphological behavior. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy revealed that the presence of compatibilizer enhanced the blend compatibility to some extent. The morphological characteristics of the blends with and without compatibilizer were examined by scanning electron microscopy. The dispersion of PLLA in the LLDPE matrix increased with the addition of compatibilizer. This blend may be used for packaging applications. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2010     

Compatibilizer in waste tire powder and low‐density polyethylene blends and the blends modified asphalt

With the increasing ratio of waste tire powder (WTP) to low‐density polyethylene (LDPE), the hardness and tensile strength of the WTP/LDPE blends decreased while the elongation at break increased. Five kinds of compatibilizers, such as maleic anhydride‐grafted polyethylene (PE‐g‐MA), maleic anhydride‐grafted ethylene‐octene copolymer (POE‐g‐MA), maleic anhydride‐grafted linear LDPE, maleic anhydride‐grafted ethylene vinyl‐acetate copolymer, and maleic anhydride‐grafted styrene‐ethylene‐butylene‐styrene, were incorporated to prepare WTP/LDPE blends, respectively. PE‐g‐MA and POE‐g‐MA reinforced the tensile stress and toughness of the blends. The toughness value of POE‐g‐MA incorporating blends was the highest, reached to 2032.3 MJ/m³, while that of the control was only 1402.9 MJ/m³. Therefore, POE‐g‐MA was selected as asphalt modifier. The toughness value reached to the highest level when the content of POE‐g‐MA was about 8%. Besides that the softening point of the modified asphalt would be higher than 60°C, whereas the content of WTP/LDPE blend was more than 5%, and the blends were mixed by stirring under the shearing speed of 3000 rpm for 20 min. Especially, when the blend content was 8.5%, the softening point arrived at 82°C, contributing to asphalt strength and elastic properties in a wide range of temperature. In addition, the swelling property of POE‐g‐MA/WTP/LDPE blend was better than that of the other compalibitizers, which indicated that POE‐g‐MA /WTP/LDPE blend was much compatible with asphalt. Also, the excellent compatibility would result in the good mechanical and processing properties of the modified asphalt. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011     

Degradation behaviors of linear low‐density polyethylene and poly(L‐lactic acid) blends

In this study, the degradability of linear low‐density polyethylene (LLDPE) and poly(L ‐lactic acid) (PLLA) blend films under controlled composting conditions was investigated according to modified ASTM D 5338 (2003). Differential scanning calorimetry, X‐ray diffraction, and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy were used to determine the thermal and morphological properties of the plastic films. LLDPE 80 (80 wt % LLDPE and 20 wt % PLLA) degraded faster than grafted low‐density polyethylene–maleic anhydride (M‐g‐L) 80/4 (80 wt % LLDPE, 20 wt % PLLA, and 4 phr compatibilizer) and pure LLDPE (LLDPE 100). The mechanical properties and weight changes were determined after composting. The tensile strength of LLDPE 100, LLDPE 80, and M‐g‐L 80/4 decreased by 20, 54, and 35%, respectively. The films, as a result of degradation, exhibited a decrease in their mass. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2012     

Effect of blending high‐pressure low‐density polyethylene on the crystallization kinetics of linear low‐density polyethylene

It is well known that the addition of a small amount of high‐pressure low‐density polyethylene (HP‐LDPE) to linear low‐density polyethylene (LLDPE) can improve the optical properties of LLDPE, and LLDPE/HP‐LDPE blend is widely applied to various uses in the field of film. The optical haziness of polyethylene blown films, as a result of surface irregularities, is thought to be as a consequence of the different crystallization mechanisms. However, not much effort has been directed toward understanding the effect of HP‐LDPE blending on the overall crystallization kinetics (k) of LLDPE including nucleation rate (n) and crystal lateral growth rate (v). In this study, we investigated the effect of blending 20% HP‐LDPE on the crystallization kinetics of LLDPE polymerized by Ziegler‐Natta catalyst with comonomer of 1‐butene. Furthermore, by combining depolarized light intensity measurement (DLIM) and small‐angle laser light scattering (SALLS), we have established a methodology to estimate the lateral growth rate at lower crystallization temperatures, in which direct measurement of lateral growth by polarized optical microscopy (POM) is impossible due to the formation of extremely small spherulites. This investigation revealed that HP‐LDPE blending leads to enhanced nucleation rate, reduced crystal lateral growth rate, and a slight increase in the overall crystallization kinetics of pure LLDPE. From the estimated crystal lateral growth rate, it was found that the suppression in v from HP‐LDPE blending is larger at lower temperatures than at higher temperatures. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 2007     

Quantitative analysis of cloisite 93A infused into linear low‐density polyethylene and maleated linear low‐density polyethylene in a supercritical carbon dioxide medium

Linear low‐density polyethylene (LLDPE) is a widely used polymer that can benefit from the enhanced barrier, thermal, and mechanical properties offered by nanoclay fillers. However, optimal property enhancement requires complete exfoliation and uniform dispersion, both of which are difficult to achieve with nanoclay fillers. Supercritical carbon dioxide (scCO₂) processing is an inexpensive and environmentally benign method for exfoliating and dispersing clays into polymers. In a scCO₂ medium under controlled environments, the organically modified clay Cloisite 93A was infused into LLDPE and maleated linear low‐density polyethylene (LLDPE‐g‐MA). Upon microscopic inspection, it was evident that clay infusion was achieved near the surface of the polymer pellet, but no clay found its way into the interior of the pellet. In this article, we describe an analytical method for determining the amount of nanoclay infused into a polymer matrix via Fourier transform infrared analysis. Using this method, we determined the weight percentage of Cloisite 93A infused into LLDPE and LLDPE‐g‐MA. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2012     

Morphology and rheological properties of compatibilized low‐density polyethylene/linear low‐density polyethylene/thermoplastic starch blends

Morphology and rheological properties of low‐density polyethylene/linear low‐density polyethylene/thermoplastic starch (LDPE/LLDPE/TPS) blends are experimentally investigated and theoretically analyzed using rheological models. Blending of LDPE/LLDPE (70/30 wt/wt) with 5–20 wt % of TPS and 3 wt % of PE‐grafted maleic anhydride (PE‐g‐MA) as a compatibilizer is performed in a twin‐screw extruder. Scanning electron micrographs show a fairly good dispersion of TPS in PE matrices in the presence of PE‐g‐MA. However, as the TPS content increases, the starch particle size increases. X‐ray diffraction patterns exhibit that with increase in TPS content, the intensity of the crystallization peaks slightly decreases and consequently crystal sizes of the blends decrease. The rheological analyses indicate that TPS can increase the elasticity and viscosity of the blends. With increasing the amount of TPS, starch particles interactions intensify and as a result the blend interface become weaker which are confirmed by relaxation time spectra and the prediction results of emulsion Palierne and Gramespacher‐Meissner models. It is demonstrated that there is a better agreement between experimental rheological data and Coran model than the emulsion models. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2017 , 134, 44719.     

Correlation between the morphology and dynamic mechanical properties of ethylene vinyl acetate/linear low‐density polyethylene blends: Effects of the blend ratio and compatibilization

The effects of the blend composition and compatibilization on the morphology of linear low‐density polyethylene (LLDPE)/ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) blends were studied. The blends showed dispersed/matrix and cocontinuous phase morphologies that depended on the composition. The blends had a cocontinuous morphology at an EVA concentration of 40–60%. The addition of the compatibilizer first decreased the domain size of the dispersed phase, which then leveled off. Two types of compatibilizers were added to the polymer/polymer interface: linear low‐density polyethylene‐g‐maleic anhydride and LLDPE‐g phenolic resin. Noolandi's theory was in agreement with the experimental data. The conformation of the compatibilizer at the blend interface could be predicted by the calculation of the area occupied by the compatibilizer molecule at the interface. The effects of the blend ratio and compatibilization on the dynamic mechanical properties of the blends were analyzed from ?60°C to +35°C. The experiments were performed over a series of frequencies. The area under the curve of the loss modulus versus the temperature was higher than the values obtained by group contribution analysis. The loss tangent curve showed a peak corresponding to the glass transition of EVA, indicating the incompatibility of the blend system. The damping characteristics of the blends increased with increasing EVA content because of the decrease in the crystalline volume of the system. Attempts were made to correlate the observed viscoelastic properties of the blends with the morphology. Various composite models were used to model the dynamic mechanical data. Compatibilization increased the storage modulus of the system because of the fine dispersion of EVA domains in the LLDPE matrix, which provided increased interfacial interaction. Better compatibilization was effected at a 0.5–1% loading of the compatibilizer. This was in full agreement with the dynamic mechanical spectroscopy data. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 100: 4526–4538, 2006     

Influence of the degree of grafting on the morphology and mechanical properties of blends of poly(butylene terephthalate) and glycidyl methacrylate grafted poly(ethylene‐co‐propylene) (EPR)

Poly(ethylene‐co‐propylene) (EPR) was functionalized to varying degrees with glycidyl methacrylate (GMA) by melt grafting processes. The EPR‐graft‐GMA elastomers were used to toughen poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT). Results showed that the grafting degree strongly influenced the morphology and mechanical properties of PBT/EPR‐graft‐GMA blends. Compatibilization reactions between the carboxyl and/or hydroxyl of PBT and epoxy groups of EPR‐graft‐GMA induced smaller dispersed phase sizes and uniform dispersed phase distributions. However, higher degrees of grafting (>1.3) and dispersed phase contents (>10 wt%) led to higher viscosities and severe crosslinking reactions in PBT/EPR‐graft‐GMA blends, resulting in larger dispersed domains of PBT blends. Consistent with the change in morphology, the impact strength of the PBT blends increased with the increase in EPR‐graft‐GMA degrees of grafting for the same dispersion phase content when the degree of grafting was below 1.8. However, PBT/EPR‐graft‐GMA1.8 displayed much lower impact strength in the ductile region than a comparable PBT/EPR‐graft‐GMA1.3 blend (1.3 indicates degree of grafting). Morphology and mechanical results showed that EPR‐graft‐GMA 1.3 was more suitable in improving the toughness of PBT. SEM results showed that the shear yielding properties of the PBT matrix and cavitation of rubber particles were major toughening mechanisms. Copyright © 2006 Society of Chemical Industry     

Preparation and properties of polymerizable 1,8‐naphthalimide fluorescent dye grafted linear low‐density polyethylene

Light converting greenhouse films are novel plastic films for agriculture. In this study, 4‐methoxy‐N‐allyl‐1,8‐naphthalimide (MOANI) was grafted onto linear low‐density polyethylenes (LLDPE‐g‐MOANI) by melt reactive mixing. The effects of monomer concentration, chamber temperature, and reaction time on grafting degree were systematically studied. Evidence of the grafting reaction was determined by ¹HNMR, FTIR, UV–Vis, and fluorescence spectrometry. Dynamic rheological properties, isothermal crystallization kinetics, surface morphologies of LLDPE, LLDPE‐g‐MOANI, and blends of LLDPE and MOANI (LLDPE/MOANI) were also analyzed. In addition, mechanical and fluorescent properties of unpurified LLDPE‐g‐MOANI films were further studied after the UV condensation weathering and acceleration migration test, respectively. We demonstrated that the cross‐linking of LLDPE could be inhibited effectively by the graft of MOANI; the grafted MOANI acted as a nucleation agent to accelerate crystallization; the grafted MOANI effectively inhibited the aging process of LLDPE and the migration of free MOANI to the surface of the unpurified LLDPE‐g‐MOANI film. The modified LLDPE showed the potential application in long‐term light converting films. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015 , 132, 42172.     

Melt miscibility and mechanical properties of metallocene linear low‐density polyethylene blends with high‐density polyethylene: influence of comonomer type

In this paper, the implications of melt miscibility on the thermal and mechanical properties of linear low‐density polyethylene (LLDPE)/high‐density polyethylene (HDPE) blends were assessed with respect to the influence of the comonomer type. The influence of the latter was examined by selecting one butene LLDPE and one octene LLDPE of very similar weight‐average molecular weight (M_w), molecular‐weight distribution (MWD) and branch content, keeping the comonomer type as the only primary molecular variable. Each of the two metallocene LLDPEs was melt‐blended with the same HDPE at 190 °C in a Haake melt‐blender. The rheological, thermal and mechanical properties were measured by the use of an ARES rheometer, differential scanning calorimeter and Instron machine, respectively. The rheological measurements, made over the linear viscoelastic range, suggested no significant influence of the branch type on the melt miscibility. The rheology results are in agreement with those obtained from previous transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and small‐angle neutron scattering (SANS) studies. The dynamic shear viscosity and total crystallinity of the metallocene (m)‐LLDPE blends with HDPE followed linear additivity. At small strains, the branch type has little or no influence on the melt miscibility and solid‐state properties of the blends. Even the large‐strain mechanical properties, such as tensile strength and elongation at break, were not influenced by the comonomer type. However, the ultimate tensile properties of the HDPE‐rich blends were poor. Incompatibility of the HDPE‐rich blends, as a result of the weak interfaces between the blend components, is suggested to develop at large strains. Copyright © 2005 Society of Chemical Industry