Miscibility and adhesive properties of ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer (EVA)‐based hot‐melt adhesives. I. Adhesive tensile strength

A series of ethylene vinyl acetate copolymers (EVA) were blended with some tackifier resins that are made from wood extracts, and possible relations between their miscibility and properties as hot‐melt adhesives (HMA) were investigated. From our previous report on miscibility of various EVA‐based HMAs, we chose some blends that represent some of typical miscibility types and measured their adhesive tensile strengths. When the blends were miscible at testing temperatures, the temperature at which the maximum value of adhesive tensile strength was recorded tended to move toward higher temperature as tackifier content of blends increased. This result corresponds to the glass transition temperature (T_g) of the blends that became higher as tackifier content of blends increased when blend components were miscible. In terms of HMA performances, we suggest that factors other than miscibility affect absolute values of adhesive tensile strength more directly than miscibility; this idea has to be investigated further in a future study. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 83: 719–725, 2002     

Adhesion and Failure Mechanisms of a Model Hot Melt Adhesive Bonded to Polypropylene

A model hot melt adhesive (HMA) based on an ethylene/vinyl acetate copolymer (EVA), an Escorez® hydrocarbon tackifier, and a wax has been used to bond together polypropylene (PP) films to give equilibrium bonding. Peel strengths were determined over a broad range of peel rates and test temperatures. Contrary to the peel behavior of joints with simple rubbery adhesives [1], peel strengths with this semi-crystalline adhesive are not rate-temperature superposable, and multiple transitions in failure locus occur. The semi-crystalline structure of the HMA also prevents rate-temperature superposition of its dynamic moduli.

At different test temperatures, the dependence of peel strength on peel rate shows some resemblance to the dependence of the loss tangent of the bulk adhesive on frequency. This is consistent with a previous result [2] that the HMA debonding term. D, varies with the loss tangent of a HMA at the T-peel debonding frequency.

This model HMA, similar to block copolymer/tackifier blends [3], consists of two phases: an EVA-rich and a tackifier-rich phase, in its amorphous region. At a low peel rate of 8.33 × 10^-5 m/s, the peel strength shows a maximum at a temperature that corresponds to the transition temperature of the tackifier-rich phase (T₁). At a higher peel rate of 8.33 × 10^-3 m/s, the peel strength rises with increasing test temperature, but becomes essentially constant at temperature T₁'. It is believed that, to optimize the peel strength of a HMA at ambient temperature, it is advantageous to formulate the EVA polymer (or other semi-crystalline polyolefins) with a compatible tackifier that yields a tackifier-rich phase with a transition temperature (T₁') in the vicinity of room temperature.     

Hot Melt Adhesive Model: Interfacial Adhesion and Polymer/Tackifier/Wax Interactions

This work continues our study of the hot melt adhesive (HMA) model published earlier [1]. This HMA model was developed based on the pressure sensitive adhesive (PSA) tack model established previously [2]:

P = P₀BD (1)

where P is the adhesive bond strength, P₀ is the interfacial (intrinsic) adhesion term, B is the bonding term and D is the debonding term. The previous paper [1] describes the B and D terms in detail. However, only a brief discussion of the P₀ term was given. The present paper will provide a more in-depth but still rather qualitative study of the P₀ term within the framework of the adhesion model described in Eq. (1). HMAs studied are ethylene/vinyl acetate copolymer (EVA)/tackifier/wax blends. Substrates studied are untreated and corona-discharge-treated polyolefins such as polypropylene (PP) and polyethylene (PE). First, it has been found that the tackifier surface tension could be roughly correlated with one of its thermodynamic parameters: the solubility parameter dispersion component. Secondly, except for EVA/tackifier binary blends, the compatibility of any two of these three components, the EVA polymer, the tackifier and the wax, in a HMA can be estimated from surface tension and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements. Thirdly, based on the study of the EVA/mixed aliphatic-aromatic tackifier/wax model HMA system, it has been observed that the HMA/polyolefin substrate interfacial composition depends on the wax/substrate compatibility. The cause of an inferior peel strength of a HMA containing a high wax content to a polyolefin substrate is possibly due to the formation of a weak boundary layer (WBL) of wax at the interface and/or low dissipative properties of the HMA.

Also, the relationship between EVA/tackifier/wax interactions and HMA peel strength will be discussed. A correlation between the EVA/tackifier compatibility measured by cloud point and viscoelastic experiments to the debonding term, D, in Eq. (1) has been found.     

Viscoelastic and adhesion properties of EVA/tackifier/wax ternary blend systems as hot-melt adhesives

Two types of wax were added to a ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) copolymer/aromatic hydrocarbon resin (tackifier) blend in the molten state and the miscibility, viscoelastic and adhesion properties of ternary blends as hot-melt adhesives (HMAs) were investigated. Miscibility and viscoelastic properties were studied using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), Brookfield viscometry and dynamic mechanical thermal analysis (DMTA), and their adhesion strength was determined in terms of single lap shear strength. DSC thermograms of both types of waxes showed their melting peaks in a similar region to that of EVA/tackfier blend. It was difficult to evaluate the miscibility of ternary blends using DSC because the melting peaks of the waxes overlapped with those of the EVA/tackifier blend, although the glass transition temperature (T _g) of the ternary blend systems slightly increased with increasing wax concentration. However, their storage modulus (E′) increased slightly and loss tangent (tan δ) showed different peaks when two types of wax were added to the EVA/tackifier blend. Therefore, the miscibility of EVA/tackifier blend altered with addition of waxes. In addition, their melt viscosity decreased with increasing wax concentration. Furthermore, the adhesion strength of the ternary blends decreased with increasing wax concentration, despite the increment of storage modulus. These results suggested that the ternary blends of EVA/tackifier/wax were heterogeneous.     

乙烯-醋酸乙烯基钢质管道防腐用热熔胶的研究

以EVA树脂为主体树脂制备钢质管道防腐用热熔胶,选用聚合松香为增粘剂,聚异丁烯为增韧剂,研究了不同VA含量、不同熔体指数的EVA树脂、聚合松香及聚异丁烯对热熔胶环球软化点、脆化温度和剥离强度等性能的影响。     

Miscibility and pressure‐sensitive adhesive performances of acrylic copolymer and hydrogenated rosin systems

Relationship between the miscibility of pressure‐sensitive adhesives (PSAs) acrylic copolymer/hydrogenated rosin systems and their performance (180° peel strength, probe tack, and holding power), which was measured over a wide range of time and temperature, were investigated. The miscible range of the blend system tended to become smaller as the molecular weight of the tackifier increased. In the case of miscible blend systems, the viscoelastic properties (such as the storage modulus and the loss modulus) shifted toward higher temperature or toward lower frequency and, at the same time, the pressure‐sensitive adhesive performance shifted toward the lower rate side as the T_g of the blend increased. In the case of acrylic copolymer/hydrogenated rosin acid systems, a somewhat unusual trend was observed in the relationship among the phase diagram, T_g, and the pressure‐sensitive adhesive performance. T_g of the blend was higher than that expected from T_gs of the pure components. This trend can be due to the presence of free carboxyl group in the tackifier resin. However, the phase diagram depended on the molecular weight of the tackifier. The pressure‐sensitive adhesive performance depended on the viscoelastic properties of the bulk phase. A few systems where a single T_g could be measured, despite the fact that two phases were observed microscopically, were found. The curve of the probe tack of this system shifted toward a lower rate side as the T_g increases. However, both the curve of the peel strength and the holding power of such system did not shift along the rate axis. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 71: 651–663, 1999     

Miscibility between natural rubber and tackifiers. I. Phase diagrams of the blends of natural rubber with rosin and terpene resins

Natural rubber (NR) was blended in various ratios with 17 kinds of tackifiers, which were prepared from rosin and terpenes. The blends were heated to various temperatures (20–120°C) in order to investigate their miscibility. The blends were visually observed for transparency or opacity at each temperature and further observed under an optical microscope for any existence of phase-separated structure. Miscibility of the blends is illustrated as phase diagrams in this article. Phase diagrams of all blends investigated in this study were classified into four types: completely miscible, lower critical solution temperature, upper critical solution temperature, and completely immiscible. The miscible range of a blend system tends to become smaller as the molecular weight of a tackifier increases. The data also indicate that the esters of hydrogenated rosin and of disproportionated rosin show comparatively good miscibility with NR whereas polymerized rosin and its esters have poor compatibility with NR in most cases. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 64: 2191–2197, 1997     

Adhesion behavior of blends of polybutadiene and tackifiers

The adhesion behavior of blends of polybutadiene (PB) and tackifiers was investigated. The peel strength was found to be significantly dependent on blend composition, and a maximum strength behavior was observed for all blend systems. The tack mechanisms were proposed to explain the observed adhesion behavior. The position of the glass transition temperature is related to where the highest tack appears for the miscible blend; for the partially miscible blend the dispersed phase plays an important role in determining the maximum adhesion, and the critical size of the dispersed phase and the Tg of the tackifier phase together determine what concentration of tackifier gives the maximum tack. For the immiscible blends, the maximum adhesion is controlled by both the surface glass transition temperature and the critical diameter of the domains of the tackifier phase.     

Miscibility Between Ethylene Vinyl Acetate Copolymers and Tackifier Resins

A series of ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer (EVA) were blended with various kinds of tackifiers and the miscibility between the components was investigated. The miscibility of the blend is illustrated as a phase diagram. The EVA and modified rosin systems tended to have a phase diagram with lower critical solution temperature (LCST), whereas the EVA and petroleum resin systems tended to have that with upper critical solution temperature (UCST). The phase diagrams of EVA/tackifier resins systematically changed as VAc content in the copolymer increased, which is accounted for by the classical Flory-Huggins theory.     

Miscibility Between Ethylene Vinyl Acetate Copolymers and Tackifier Resins

A series of ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer (EVA) were blended with various kinds of tackifiers and the miscibility between the components was investigated. The miscibility of the blend is illustrated as a phase diagram. The EVA and modified rosin systems tended to have a phase diagram with lower critical solution temperature (LCST), whereas the EVA and petroleum resin systems tended to have that with upper critical solution temperature (UCST). The phase diagrams of EVA/tackifier resins systematically changed as VAc content in the copolymer increased, which is accounted for by the classical Flory-Huggins theory.     

Miscibility and Probe Tack of Acrylic Pressure Sensitive Adhesives—Acrylic Copolymer/Tackifier Resin Systems

Miscibility between acrylic copolymers and tackifier resins are investigated in terms of phase diagrams, and the probe tack of the blends are measured as a function of both temperature and rate of separation in order to obtain the master curves. It is found that the probe tack of the pressure sensitive adhesives are closely related to the miscibility between the components. The master curves of the miscible blends shift along the X(rate)-axis according to the change of T_g of the bulk materials with a gradual variation of the peak heights. However, those of the immiscible blends will not shift along the X(rate)-axis, but the magnitude will decrease with increase of a dispersed phase.     

Miscibility and shear creep resistance of acrylic pressure-sensitive adhesives: Acrylic copolymer and tackifier resin systems

The miscibility between an acrylic copolymer and a tackifier resin was investigated in terms of phase diagrams, glass transition temperatures (T_g's), and dynamic mechanical properties of blends. Shear creep resistance (holding power, t_b) of the blends was measured as a function of both temperature and stress (σ₀) in order to obtain the master curves. It was found that the shear creep resistance of the pressure-sensitive adhesives (PSAs) was closely related to the miscibility between the components and viscoelastic properties of the blends. The master curve of the miscible blends shifts toward a longer time scale as the amount of tackifier resin in the blend is increased as a result of the modification of the bulk properties, and their behavior greatly depends on the glass transition temperature (T_g) and storage modulus (G′) of the blends. However, the master curve of immiscible blends where two phases exist in the system does not shift greatly toward a longer time scale, because T_g and the storage modulus of the blend do not change greatly. © 1995 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Miscibility between natural rubber and tackifiers. II. Phase diagrams of the blends of natural rubber and petroleum resins

Natural rubber (NR) was blended in various ratios with 12 kinds of tackifiers that were prepared from petroleum. The blends were heated to various temperatures (20–120°C) to investigate their miscibility. The blends were visually observed for transparency or opacity at each temperature and further observed under an optical microscope for any existence of phase-separated structure. Miscibility of the blends is illustrated as phase diagrams in this article. NR/aliphatic resin systems and NR/aliphatic-aromatic copolymer systems showed phase diagrams of the lower critical solution temperature type, wherein the blends turned faintly cloudy over the binodal curves. The NR/hydrogenated petroleum resin system also showed a phase diagram of the lower critical solution temperature type. The miscible range of a blend system tends to become smaller as the molecular weight of a tackifier increases. Resins prepared by polymerization of pure aromatic monomers were completely immiscible with NR. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 67: 221–229, 1998     

Rheological study on the adhesion properties of the blends of ethylene vinyl acetate/terpene phenol adhesives

Measurements of the shear, tensile, peel, and creep strength of ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA)/CaCO₃/terpene phenol adhesive system at three different ratios [100/60/0 (EVA-O), 80/48/20 (EVA-20), and 60/36/40 (EVA-40) by weight, using wood and aluminum as adherends] were conducted. Over a wide range of temperatures and rates of deformation, adhesion shear, tensile, and peel strength results, as well as the creep response over a broad range of temperature and stresses, were found to yield a single master curve by means of the reduced-variable technique. It was observed that the peak of E′ representing Tg, shifted toward higher temperatures as the amount of terpene phenol in the blend was increased. The most obvious effect of increasing the tackifier resin was the shifting of the adhesion strength master curves to the direction of lower rates. The shift was associated with the rise in Tg as the blend ratio was increased. The influence of the tackifier resin in modifying the viscoelastic properties of the adhesive was further described in a comparison of the adhesion strength master curves with corresponding dynamic viscoelastic curves of the adhesive films. The master curves for the creep response of the adhesives showed that the stress-breaking time relationship shifts toward longer time for EVA-40 with high Tg. Thus, it was found that the strength of adhesion is due mainly to dynamic effects in the adhesive of a viscous nature in the same way to the cohesive strength of the viscoelastic materials. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 70: 409–418, 1998     

Influence of the vinyl acetate content and the tackifier nature on the rheological,thermal, and adhesion properties of EVA adhesives

Three ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) copolymers with different vinyl acetate (VA) contents (28-40 wt%) were mixed with rosin ester and polyterpene resin tackifiers in a 1 : 1 (weight/weight) ratio. The rheological and thermal properties of the tackifiers were determined and the use of rheological measurements as a precise way to measure the softening point of the tackifiers is proposed. The glass transition temperature of the tackifiers was obtained from the second heating run, after the thermal history of the tackifiers was removed. The addition of the rosin ester to EVA produced a compatible mixture, whereas for the terpene resin a less compatible mixture was obtained. The increase in the VAamount decreased the crystallinity of EVAand both the storage and the loss moduli also decreased, but the peel strength and the immediate adhesion were increased. The immediate adhesion of EVA/tackifier blends was affected by both the compatibility and the rheological properties of the blends. In fact, a relationship between the mechanical storage modulus (E^t′) - obtained from DMTA experiments - of the adhesives and the immediate adhesion to thin rubber substrates was obtained. The adhesives containing the T tackifier showed higher moduli than those containing the G tackifier, and therefore higher peel strength values were obtained. An increase in the VA content increased the flexibility of the adhesives and thus a decrease in peel strength was obtained.     

高效水密封防腐绝缘热熔胶的研究

以EVA树脂为主体树脂制备高效水密封防腐绝缘热熔胶,选用热塑性酚醛树脂代替松香作为增粘剂,聚异丁烯为增韧剂,研究了不同EVA树脂、热塑性酚醛树脂及聚异丁烯对热熔胶环球软化点、脆化温度和剪切强度等性能的影响。     

Effects of compatibility between tackifier and polymer on adhesion property and phase structure: Tackifier‐added polystyrene‐based triblock/diblock copolymer blend system

The effects of compatibility of tackifier with polymer matrix and mixing weight ratio of triblock/diblock copolymers as the matrix on the adhesion property and phase structure of tackifier‐added polystryrene triblock/diblock copolymer blends were investigated. For this purpose, polystyrene‐block‐polyisoprene‐block‐polystyrene triblock and polystyrene‐block‐polyisoprene diblock copolymers were used and the diblock weight ratio in the blend was varied from 0 to 1. Spherical polystyrene domains with a mean size of about 20 nm were dispersed in the polyisoprene (PI) continuous phase. In the case of the hydrogenated cycloaliphatic resin as tackifier having a good compatibility with PI and a poor compatibility with polystyrene, the peel strength increased with an increase of the tackifier content, and the degree of increase became significant above 40 wt % of tackifier. It was found that the nanometer‐sized agglomerates of tackifier in the PI matrix were formed and the distance between the nearest neighbors of agglomerates was about 15 nm from SAXS measurement. The peel strength increased with an increase of the nanometer‐sized agglomerates of tackifier from TEM observation. On the other hand, in the case of the rosin phenolic resin as tackifier having a good compatibility with both polystyrene and PI, the peel strength increased effectively at the lower tackifier content, while no significant increase at higher tackifier content was observed. The agglomerates of tackifier were never confirmed in this system. The higher peel strength was obtained at the diblock weight ratio in the blend of 0.5–0.7 for both tackifier‐added systems. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011     

Blends of chlorinated isotactic polypropylene with poly(ethylene-co-vinyl acetate) I. Effect of component polymers composition on the blend miscibility

Chlorinated isotactic polypropylenes (CPP) having various chlorine contents were blended with poly(ethylene-co-vinyl acetate)s (EVA) having various vinyl acetate (VA) contents. The blends were made by casting films from dilute THF solutions and miscibility of the blends was identified by single glass transition temperature, which was confirmed by DSC and dynamic mechanical measurements. Based on the miscibility data from a large number of CPP/EVA combinations, a miscibility map was depicted where CO equivalent weight (CO-EQW) of EVA was plotted against chlorine equivalent weight (Cl-EQW) of CPP. Though an attractive interaction between CPP and EVA could be detected in all the miscible and immiscible blend pairs, miscibility of the CPP/EVA blends could solely be observed in a relatively narrow range of Cl-EQW ca. 65–100 and CO-EQW ca. 170–230.     

Miscibility in blends of linear and branched poly(ethylene oxide) with methacrylate derivative random copolymers and estimation of segmental χ parameters

Miscibility in the blends of poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) with n-hexyl methacrylate-methyl methacrylate random copolymers (HMA-MMA) and 2-ethylhexyl methacrylate-MMA random copolymers (EHMA-MMA) was evaluated using glass transition and light scattering methods. EHMA-MMA was more miscible with PEO than HMA-MMA. Both blends of PEO with HMA-MMA and EHMA-MMA showed UCST-type miscibility although homopolymer blends PEO/PMMA were predicted to be of LCST-type. This was attributed to an increase in the exchange enthalpy with increasing HMA or EHMA composition in the random copolymer. From the copolymer composition dependence of miscibility the segmental χ parameters of HMA/MMA, EHMA/MMA, EO/HMA and EO/EHMA were estimated using the Flory-Huggins theory extended to random copolymer systems. Miscibility in the blends of branched PEO with HMA-MMA whose HMA copolymer composition was 0.16 was compared with that in the linear PEO blends. The former blends were more miscible with HMA-MMA than the latter one by about 35 °C at the maximum cloud point temperature.     

Miscible and immiscible blends of ABS with PMMA. II. Mechanical and surface properties

Mechanical and surface properties of injection-molded specimens for miscible and immiscible blends of ABS with PMMA were investigated. Regardless of miscibility, hardness, modulus, and strength of the blends generally showed a smooth variation with composition, with the possible exception of impact strength. In miscible blends, impact strength decreased smoothly with PMMA; however, in immiscible blends, a drastic drop to less than the half that of ABS was obtained at 10 wt % PMMA. Compounding at higher temperature gave decreased modulus and strength and increased impact strength. Surface gloss decreased with PMMA addition in the miscible system and increased in the immiscible system up to 50 wt % PMMA. From contact-angle and FTIR measurements, it is suggested that the surface properties are governed by miscibility and the viscosity ratio of the components. © 1993 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.