Miscibility and adhesive properties of EVA‐based hot‐melt adhesives. II. Peel strength

A series of ethylene vinyl acetate copolymers (EVA) were blended with some tackifier resins that were made from wood extracts, and possible relations between their miscibility and properties as hot‐melt adhesives (HMA) were investigated. From our previous report on miscibility of various EVA‐based HMAs, we chose some blends that represent some of the typical miscibility types and investigated their peel strengths. When the blends were miscible at testing temperatures, the temperature at which the maximum value of peel strength was recorded tended to move toward higher temperature as tackifier content of blends increased. This result corresponds to the storage modulus of the blends whose curves tended to move toward higher temperature as tackifier content of blends increased when blend components were miscible as well as their maximum values of tan δ, or glass transition temperatures. It was characteristic for peel strength that there existed second peaks on peel strengths curves at ～ 100°C, which adhesive tensile strengths for the blends did not have. In terms of relationship between miscibility and HMA performances, we suggest that there are several factors other than miscibility that affect absolute values of peel strength more directly than miscibility; this idea has to be investigated further in the a future study. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 83: 726–735, 2002     

Viscoelastic and adhesion properties of EVA/tackifier/wax ternary blend systems as hot-melt adhesives

Two types of wax were added to a ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) copolymer/aromatic hydrocarbon resin (tackifier) blend in the molten state and the miscibility, viscoelastic and adhesion properties of ternary blends as hot-melt adhesives (HMAs) were investigated. Miscibility and viscoelastic properties were studied using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), Brookfield viscometry and dynamic mechanical thermal analysis (DMTA), and their adhesion strength was determined in terms of single lap shear strength. DSC thermograms of both types of waxes showed their melting peaks in a similar region to that of EVA/tackfier blend. It was difficult to evaluate the miscibility of ternary blends using DSC because the melting peaks of the waxes overlapped with those of the EVA/tackifier blend, although the glass transition temperature (T _g) of the ternary blend systems slightly increased with increasing wax concentration. However, their storage modulus (E′) increased slightly and loss tangent (tan δ) showed different peaks when two types of wax were added to the EVA/tackifier blend. Therefore, the miscibility of EVA/tackifier blend altered with addition of waxes. In addition, their melt viscosity decreased with increasing wax concentration. Furthermore, the adhesion strength of the ternary blends decreased with increasing wax concentration, despite the increment of storage modulus. These results suggested that the ternary blends of EVA/tackifier/wax were heterogeneous.     

Miscibility and pressure‐sensitive adhesive performances of acrylic copolymer and hydrogenated rosin systems

Relationship between the miscibility of pressure‐sensitive adhesives (PSAs) acrylic copolymer/hydrogenated rosin systems and their performance (180° peel strength, probe tack, and holding power), which was measured over a wide range of time and temperature, were investigated. The miscible range of the blend system tended to become smaller as the molecular weight of the tackifier increased. In the case of miscible blend systems, the viscoelastic properties (such as the storage modulus and the loss modulus) shifted toward higher temperature or toward lower frequency and, at the same time, the pressure‐sensitive adhesive performance shifted toward the lower rate side as the T_g of the blend increased. In the case of acrylic copolymer/hydrogenated rosin acid systems, a somewhat unusual trend was observed in the relationship among the phase diagram, T_g, and the pressure‐sensitive adhesive performance. T_g of the blend was higher than that expected from T_gs of the pure components. This trend can be due to the presence of free carboxyl group in the tackifier resin. However, the phase diagram depended on the molecular weight of the tackifier. The pressure‐sensitive adhesive performance depended on the viscoelastic properties of the bulk phase. A few systems where a single T_g could be measured, despite the fact that two phases were observed microscopically, were found. The curve of the probe tack of this system shifted toward a lower rate side as the T_g increases. However, both the curve of the peel strength and the holding power of such system did not shift along the rate axis. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 71: 651–663, 1999     

Hot Melt Adhesive Model: Interfacial Adhesion and Polymer/Tackifier/Wax Interactions

This work continues our study of the hot melt adhesive (HMA) model published earlier [1]. This HMA model was developed based on the pressure sensitive adhesive (PSA) tack model established previously [2]:

P = P₀BD (1)

where P is the adhesive bond strength, P₀ is the interfacial (intrinsic) adhesion term, B is the bonding term and D is the debonding term. The previous paper [1] describes the B and D terms in detail. However, only a brief discussion of the P₀ term was given. The present paper will provide a more in-depth but still rather qualitative study of the P₀ term within the framework of the adhesion model described in Eq. (1). HMAs studied are ethylene/vinyl acetate copolymer (EVA)/tackifier/wax blends. Substrates studied are untreated and corona-discharge-treated polyolefins such as polypropylene (PP) and polyethylene (PE). First, it has been found that the tackifier surface tension could be roughly correlated with one of its thermodynamic parameters: the solubility parameter dispersion component. Secondly, except for EVA/tackifier binary blends, the compatibility of any two of these three components, the EVA polymer, the tackifier and the wax, in a HMA can be estimated from surface tension and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements. Thirdly, based on the study of the EVA/mixed aliphatic-aromatic tackifier/wax model HMA system, it has been observed that the HMA/polyolefin substrate interfacial composition depends on the wax/substrate compatibility. The cause of an inferior peel strength of a HMA containing a high wax content to a polyolefin substrate is possibly due to the formation of a weak boundary layer (WBL) of wax at the interface and/or low dissipative properties of the HMA.

Also, the relationship between EVA/tackifier/wax interactions and HMA peel strength will be discussed. A correlation between the EVA/tackifier compatibility measured by cloud point and viscoelastic experiments to the debonding term, D, in Eq. (1) has been found.     

Adhesion and Failure Mechanisms of a Model Hot Melt Adhesive Bonded to Polypropylene

A model hot melt adhesive (HMA) based on an ethylene/vinyl acetate copolymer (EVA), an Escorez® hydrocarbon tackifier, and a wax has been used to bond together polypropylene (PP) films to give equilibrium bonding. Peel strengths were determined over a broad range of peel rates and test temperatures. Contrary to the peel behavior of joints with simple rubbery adhesives [1], peel strengths with this semi-crystalline adhesive are not rate-temperature superposable, and multiple transitions in failure locus occur. The semi-crystalline structure of the HMA also prevents rate-temperature superposition of its dynamic moduli.

At different test temperatures, the dependence of peel strength on peel rate shows some resemblance to the dependence of the loss tangent of the bulk adhesive on frequency. This is consistent with a previous result [2] that the HMA debonding term. D, varies with the loss tangent of a HMA at the T-peel debonding frequency.

This model HMA, similar to block copolymer/tackifier blends [3], consists of two phases: an EVA-rich and a tackifier-rich phase, in its amorphous region. At a low peel rate of 8.33 × 10^-5 m/s, the peel strength shows a maximum at a temperature that corresponds to the transition temperature of the tackifier-rich phase (T₁). At a higher peel rate of 8.33 × 10^-3 m/s, the peel strength rises with increasing test temperature, but becomes essentially constant at temperature T₁'. It is believed that, to optimize the peel strength of a HMA at ambient temperature, it is advantageous to formulate the EVA polymer (or other semi-crystalline polyolefins) with a compatible tackifier that yields a tackifier-rich phase with a transition temperature (T₁') in the vicinity of room temperature.     

Miscibility and crystallization kinetics of poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate‐co‐3‐hydroxyvalerate)/ poly(methyl methacrylate) blends

The miscibility and crystallization kinetics of the blends of random poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate‐co‐3‐hydroxyvalerate) [P(HB‐co‐HV)] copolymer and poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) were investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and polarized optical microscopy (POM). It was found that P(HB‐co‐HV)/PMMA blends were miscible in the melt. Thus the single glass‐transition temperature (T_g) of the blends within the whole composition range suggests that P(HB‐co‐HV) and PMMA were totally miscible for the miscible blends. The equilibrium melting point (T°_m) of P(HB‐co‐HV) in the P(HB‐co‐HV)/PMMA blends decreased with increasing PMMA. The T°_m depression supports the miscibility of the blends. With respect to the results of crystallization kinetics, it was found that both the spherulitic growth rate and the overall crystallization rate decreased with the addition of PMMA. The kinetics retardation was attributed to the decrease in P(HB‐co‐HV) molecular mobility and dilution of P(HB‐co‐HV) concentration resulting from the addition of PMMA, which has a higher T_g. According to secondary nucleation theory, the kinetics of spherulitic crystallization of P(HB‐co‐HV) in the blends was analyzed in the studied temperature range. The crystallizations of P(HB‐co‐HV) in P(HB‐co‐HV)/PMMA blends were assigned to n = 4, regime III growth process. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 91: 3595–3603, 2004     

Novel polyisobutylene stars. XXIII. Thermal,mechanical, and processing characteristics of poly(phenylene ether)/polydivinylbenzene(polyisobutylene‐b‐polystyrene)37 blends

The objective of these investigations was to increase the use temperature of novel star‐block polymers consisting of a crosslinked polydivinylbenzene (PDVB) core from which radiate multiple poly(isobutylene‐b‐polystyrene) (PIB‐b‐PSt) arms, abbreviated by PDVB(PIB‐b‐PSt)_n. We achieved this objective by blending star‐blocks with poly(phenylene oxide) (PPO) that is miscible with PSt. Thus, various PPO/PDVB(PIB‐b‐PSt)_n blends were prepared, and their thermal, mechanical, and processing properties were investigated. The hard‐phase glass‐transition temperature of the blends could be controlled by the amount (wt %) of PPO. The blends displayed superior retention of tensile strengths at high temperatures as compared to star blocks. The melt viscosities of blends with low weight percentages of PPO were lower than those of star blocks. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 86: 2866–2872, 2002     

The study of poly(styrene‐co‐p‐(hexafluoro‐2‐hydroxylisopropyl)‐α‐methylstyrene)/poly(ethylene oxide) blends

Different hydroxyl content poly(styrene‐co‐p‐(hexafluoro‐2‐hydroxylisopropyl)‐α‐methylstyene) [PS(OH)‐X] copolymers were synthesized and blends with 2,2,6,6‐tetramrthyl‐piperdine‐1‐oxyl end spin‐labeled PEO [SLPEO] were prepared. The miscibility behavior of all the blends was predicted by comparing the critical miscible polymer–polymer interaction parameter (χ_crit) with the polymer–polymer interaction parameter (χ). The micro heterogeneity, chain motion, and hydrogen bonding interaction of the blends were investigated by the ESR spin label method. Two spectral components with different rates of motion were observed in the ESR composite spectra of all the blends, indicating the existence of microheterogeneity at the molecular level. According to the variations of ESR spectral parameters T_a, T_d, ΔT, T_50G and τ_c, with the increasing hydroxyl content in blends, it was shown that the extent of miscibility was progressively enhanced due to the controllable hydrogen bonding interaction between the hydroxyl in PS(OH) and the ether oxygen in PEO. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 92: 2312–2317, 2004     

乙烯-醋酸乙烯基钢质管道防腐用热熔胶的研究

以EVA树脂为主体树脂制备钢质管道防腐用热熔胶,选用聚合松香为增粘剂,聚异丁烯为增韧剂,研究了不同VA含量、不同熔体指数的EVA树脂、聚合松香及聚异丁烯对热熔胶环球软化点、脆化温度和剥离强度等性能的影响。     

Miscibility windows in ternary polymer blends of a polyester,polymethacrylate and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile)

Miscibility, phase diagrams and morphology of poly(ε‐caprolactone) (PCL)/poly(benzyl methacrylate) (PBzMA)/poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (SAN) ternary blends were investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), optical microscopy (OM), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The miscibility window of PCL/PBzMA/SAN ternary blends is influenced by the acrylonitrile (AN) content in the SAN copolymers. At ambient temperature, the ternary polymer blend is completely miscible within a closed‐loop miscibility window. DSC showed only one glass transition temperature (T_g) for PCL/PBzMA/SAN‐17 and PCL/PBzMA/SAN‐25 ternary blends; furthermore, OM and SEM results showed that PCL/PBzMA/SAN‐17 and PCL/PBzMA/SAN‐25 were homogeneous for any composition of the ternary phase diagram. Hence, it demonstrated that miscibility exists for PCL/PBzMA/SAN‐17 and PCL/PBzMA/SAN‐25 ternary blends, but that the ternary system becomes phase‐separated outside these AN contents. Copyright © 2003 Society of Chemical Industry     

Preparation and characterization of syndiotactic polystyrene/ethylene‐propylene copolymer blends

The reactive compatibilization of syndiotactic polystyrene (sPS)/oxazoline‐styrene copolymer (RPS)/maleic anhydride grafted ethylene‐propylene copolymer (EPR‐MA) blends is investigated in this study. First, the miscibility of sPS/RPS blends is examined by thermal analysis. The cold crystallization peak (T_cc) moved toward higher temperature with increased PRS, and, concerning enthalpy relaxation behaviors, only a single enthalpy relation peak was found in all aged samples. These results indicate that the sPS/RPS blend is miscible along the various compositions and RPS can be used in the reactive compatibilization of sPS/RPS/EPR‐MA blends. The reactive compatibilized sPS/RPS/EPR‐MA blends showed finer morphology than sPS/EPR‐MA physical blends and higher storage modulus (G') and complex viscosity (η*) when RPS contents were increased. Moreover, the impact strength of sPS/RPS/EPR‐MA increased significantly compared to sPS/EPR‐MA blend, and SEM micrographs after impact testing show that the sPS/RPS/EPR‐MA blend has better adhesion between the sPS matrix and the dispersed EPR‐MA phase. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 85: 2084–2091, 2002     

Blends of poly(vinyl chloride) with α‐methylstyrene‐acrylonitrile‐butadiene‐styrene copolymer: Thermal properties,mechanical properties,and morphology

Binary blends of poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC) with α‐methylstyrene‐acrylonitrile‐butadiene‐styrene copolymer (AMS‐ABS) were prepared via melt blending. A single glass transition temperature (T_g) was observed by differential scanning calorimetry, thus indicating that PVC is miscible with the α‐methylstyrene‐acrylonitrile‐styrene in AMS‐ABS. The results from attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared spectra indicated that specific strong interactions were not available in the blends. With increasing amounts of AMS‐ABS, both heat distortion temperature and thermal stability were increased considerably. With regard to mechanical properties, flexural and tensile properties decreased with increasing AMS‐ABS content. A synergism was observed in impact strength. The morphology of both impact‐fractured and tensile‐fractured surfaces, observed by scanning electron microscopy, correlated well with the mechanical properties. It is suggested that there was a transition of fracture mechanisms with the changing composition of the binary blends—from shear yielding for blends rich in PVC to cavitation for blends rich in AMS‐ABS. J. VINYL ADDIT. TECHNOL., 19:1–10, 2013. © 2013 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Preparation and characterization of novolac type phenolic resin blended with poly(dimethylsiloxane adipamide)

Phenolic resin/poly(dimethylsiloxane adipamide) (PDMSA) blends, which have been prepared, show miscibility due to intermolecular H‐bonding existing between phenolic resin and the PDMSA. The specific H‐bonding of novolac type phenolic/PDMSA blends was characterized by means of glass transition temperature behavior and Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR). The strength of intermolecular H‐bonding within the phenolic blend is a function of the H‐bonded group of the PDMSA modifier and corresponds to the deviation glass transition temperature (ΔT_g). Phenolic/PDMSA blends were completely miscible, as confirmed by the T_g study. The FTIR result is in good agreement with the inference from T_g behavior. The char yield of phenolic/PDMSA corresponds to the phenolic resin content. The molecular mobility of phenolic/PDMSA blends increases with PDMSA content in the phenolic‐rich region. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 86: 984–992, 2002     

Mechanical and thermal properties of (acrylonitrile‐styrene‐acrylic)/(α‐methylstyrene‐acrylonitrile) binary blends

In this work, (acrylonitrile‐styrene‐acrylic)/(α‐methylstyrene‐acrylonitrile) copolymer (ASA/α‐MSAN) binary alloy was prepared with different composition ratios via melt blending. This work mainly focused on improving the heat resistance of ASA. According to the results of dynamic mechanical thermal analysis, the binary blends exhibited three glass transition temperatures (T_gs) and the shift of the T_gs indicated the partial miscibility of binary blends. This partial miscibility maintained the high T_g of α‐MSAN, which led to the outstanding heat resistance of binary blends. Furthermore, heat distortion temperature also showed that the heat resistance of binary blends was significantly enhanced with the addition of α‐MSAN. However, the introduction of this highly rigid polymer also brought with it the sharp decrease of the impact strength and elongation at break, which is reflected in the morphologies of the blend system obtained via scanning electron microscopy. In addition, the incorporation of α‐MSAN increased the tensile strength, flexural strength, and modulus. There were no new groups observed from Fourier‐transform infrared spectra, which means no strong specific intermolecular interactions existed between ASA and α‐MSAN. Moreover, the processibility of the blend system was obviously improved from the results of melt flow rate. J. VINYL ADDIT. TECHNOL., 22:156–162, 2016. © 2014 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Preparation and properties of dynamically cured PP/MAH‐g‐EVA/epoxy blends

A method concerning with the simultaneous reinforcing and toughening of polypropylene (PP) was reported. Dynamical cure of the epoxy resin with 2‐ethylene‐4‐methane‐imidazole (EMI‐2,4) was successfully applied in the PP/maleic anhydride‐grafted ethylene‐vinyl acetate copolymer (MAH‐g‐EVA), and the obtained blends named as dynamically cured PP/MAH‐g‐EVA/epoxy blends. The stiffness and toughness of the blends are in a good balance, and the smaller size of epoxy particle in the PP/MAH‐g‐EVA/epoxy blends shows that MAH‐g‐EVA was also used as a compatibilizer. The structure of the dynamically cured PP/MAH‐g‐EVA/epoxy blends is the embedding of the epoxy particles by the MAH‐g‐EVA. The cured epoxy particles as organic filler increases the stiffness of the PP/MAH‐g‐EVA blends, and the improvement in the toughness is attributed to the embedded structure. The tensile strength and flexural modulus of the blends increase with increasing the epoxy resin content, and the impact strength reaches a maximum of 258 J/m at the epoxy resin content of 10 wt %. DSC analysis shows that the epoxy particles in the dynamically cured PP/MAH‐g‐EVA/epoxy blends could have contained embedded MAH‐g‐EVA, decreasing the nucleating effect of the epoxy resin. Thermogravimetric results show the addition of epoxy resin could improve the thermal stability of PP, the dynamically cured PP/MAH‐g‐EVA/epoxy stability compared with the pure PP. Wide‐angle x‐ray diffraction analysis shows that the dynamical cure and compatibilization do not disturb the crystalline structure of PP in the blends. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2009     

PLA/chain‐extended PEG blends with improved ductility

Melt blending of polylactic acid (PLA) and a chain‐extended polyethylene glycol (CE‐PEG) have been performed in an effort to toughen the PLA without significant loss of modulus and ultimate tensile strength. The chain‐extended PEG was prepared with melt condensation of a low molecular weight PEG and 4,4′‐methylenebis(phenylisocyanate) (MDI) for enhancement of the molecular weight of PEG. The thermal and mechanical properties, miscibility and phase morphologies of blends were investigated. By using thermal and fracture surface analysis, the blends were found to be a partially miscible system with shifted glass transition temperatures. The addition of CE‐PEG leads to slight decrease in tensile strength and modulus, while the elongation at break is characterized by an important increase (540%), compared with neat PLA and PLA/PEG (low molecular weight PEG, M_n = 35,000). The relative ductility of PLA/CE‐PEG is 40 times higher than that of neat PLA. The brittle fracture of neat PLA was transformed into a ductile fracture by the addition of CE‐PEG. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2012     

Ionomeric blends of poly(ethylene oxide) with poly(styrene‐co‐maleic anhydride) ionomer: Miscibility,crystallization, and melting behavior

The miscibility and crystallization behavior of poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) and poly(styrene‐co‐maleic anhydride) ionomer (SMAI) blends were studied by the dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). This study has demonstrated that the presence of ion–dipole interactions enhances the miscibility of otherwise immiscible polymers in the PEO and high molecular weight poly(styrene‐co‐maleic anhydride) (SMA). The effect of ion–dipole interactions on enhancing miscibility is confirmed by the presence of a single glass transition temperature (T_g) and a depression of the equilibrium melting temperature of the PEO component. The equilibrium melting temperature of PEO in the blends are obtained using Hoffman‐Weeks plots. The interaction energy density, β, is calculated from these data using the Nishi‐Wang equation. The results suggest that PEO and SMAI blends are thermodynamically miscible in the melt. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 77: 1–7, 2000     

Toughening effects of ethylene–vinyl acetate copolymers with different vinyl acetate content and viscosity on nylon 1010 blends

Nylon 1010 blends with ethylene–vinyl acetate copolymer (EVA) and maleated ethylene–vinyl acetate (EVA‐g‐MAH) were prepared through melt blending. The vinyl acetate (VA) content and viscosity of EVA significantly affected the notched impact strength of nylon/EVA/EVA‐g‐MAH (80/15/5) blends. The nylon/EVA/EVA‐g‐MAH blends with high notched impact strength (over 60 kJ/m²) were obtained when the VA content in EVA ranged from 28 to 60 wt%. The effect of VA content on the notched impact strength of blends was related to the glass transition temperature for EVA with high VA content and crystallinity for EVA with low VA content. For nylon blends with EVA with the same VA content, low viscosity of EVA led to high notched impact strength. Fracture morphology of nylon/EVA/EVA‐g‐MAH (80/15/5) blends showed that blends with ductile fracture behavior usually had large matrix plastic deformation, which was the main energy dissipation mechanism. A relationship between the notched impact strength and the morphology of nylon/EVA/EVA‐g‐MAH (80/15/5) blends was well correlated by the interparticle distance model. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2009. © 2009 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Poly(ethylene‐co‐vinyl acetate) blends with phenoxy

EVA was blended with phenoxy over the whole range of composition using a twin‐screw Brabender. Two‐phase separation caused by EVA crystallization was observed in the EVA‐rich blends and the dispersed domain of EVA was not clearly shown in the phenoxy‐rich blends. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) showed that the glass transition temperature (T_g) of EVA was increased by 5–10°C in the EVA‐rich blends but the T_g of phenoxy was superposed over the melting behavior of EVA. X‐ray diffraction measurement indicated that EVA crystallization was restricted in the phenoxy‐rich blends and the EVA crystal structure was influenced by incorporation of phenoxy into the EVA‐rich blends. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 73: 227–236, 1999     

Properties of soy protein isolate/poly(ethylene‐co‐ethyl acrylate‐co‐maleic anhydride) blends

Blends of soy protein isolate (SPI) with 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50% poly(ethylene‐co‐ethyl acrylate‐co‐maleic anhydride) (PEEAMA), with or without addition of 2.0 wt % methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI), were prepared by mixing with an intensive mixer at 150°C for 5 min, and then milling through a 1‐mm sieve. Blends were then compression‐molded into a tensile bar at 140°C. Thermal and mechanical properties and water absorption of the blends were studied by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), dynamical mechanic analysis (DMA), a test of modulus and tensile strength (with an Instron tensile tester), a water absorption test, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The blends showed two composition‐dependent glass transition temperatures. Furthermore, as the SPI content increased, the melting temperature of PEEAMA remained constant but the heat of fusion decreased. These results indicate that SPI and PEEAMA were partially miscible. Morphology observations support these results. Increasing the PEEAMA content resulted in decreases in the modulus and tensile strengths and increases in the elongation and toughness of the blends. Water absorption of the blends also decreased with increased PEEAMA content. Incorporating MDI further decreased the water absorption of the blends. The mechanism of water sorption of SPI was relaxation controlled, and that of the blends was diffusion controlled. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 88: 407–413, 2003