Truncation and Optimisation of Peptide Inhibitors of Cyclin‐Dependent Kinase 2‐Cyclin A Through Structure‐Guided Design

Peptides that inhibit cyclin‐dependent kinase 2 by blocking the macromolecular substrate recruitment site of cyclin A were simplified, for example, by replacement of dipeptide units with β‐amino acids. The smallest inhibitor retaining activity was a tripeptide, whose binding mode was confirmed by X‐ray crystallography. This result suggests that nonpeptidic cyclin groove inhibitors may be feasible therapeutic agents.

     

Tampering with Cell Division by Using Small‐Molecule Inhibitors of CDK–CKS Protein Interactions

Cyclin‐dependent kinases (CDKs) control many cellular processes and are considered important therapeutic targets. Large collections of inhibitors targeting CDK active sites have been discovered, but their use in chemical biology or drug development has been often hampered by their general lack of specificity. An alternative approach to develop more specific inhibitors is targeting protein interactions involving CDKs. CKS proteins interact with some CDKs and play important roles in cell division. We discovered two small‐molecule inhibitors of CDK–CKS interactions. They bind to CDK2, do not inhibit its enzymatic activity, inhibit the proliferation of tumor cell lines, induce an increase in G1 and/or S‐phase cell populations, and cause a decrease in CDK2, cyclin A, and p27^Kip1 levels. These molecules should help decipher the complex contributions of CDK–CKS complexes in the regulation of cell division, and they might present an interesting therapeutic potential.     

A Combination Strategy to Inhibit Pim‐1: Synergism between Noncompetitive and ATP‐Competitive Inhibitors

Pim‐1 is a serine/threonine kinase critically involved in the initiation and progression of various types of cancer, especially leukemia, lymphomas and solid tumors such as prostate, pancreas and colon, and is considered a potential drug target against these malignancies. In an effort to discover new potent Pim‐1 inhibitors, a previously identified ATP‐competitive indolyl‐pyrrolone scaffold was expanded to derive structure–activity relationship data. A virtual screening campaign was also performed, which led to the discovery of additional ATP‐competitive inhibitors as well as a series of 2‐aminothiazole derivatives, which are noncompetitive with respect to both ATP and peptide substrate. This mechanism of action, which resembles allosteric inhibition, has not previously been characterized for Pim‐1. Notably, further evaluation of the 2‐aminothiazoles indicated a synergistic inhibitory effect in enzymatic assays when tested in combination with ATP‐competitive inhibitors. A synergistic effect in the inhibition of cell proliferation by ATP‐competitive and ATP‐noncompetitive compounds was also observed in prostate cancer cell lines (PC3), where all Pim‐1 inhibitors tested in showed synergism with the known anticancer agent, paclitaxel. These results further establish Pim‐1 as a target in cancer therapy, and highlight the potential of these agents for use as adjuvant agents in the treatment of cancer diseases in which Pim‐1 is associated with chemotherapeutic resistance.     

Discovery of Non‐ATP‐Competitive Inhibitors of Polo‐like Kinase 1

Polo‐like kinase 1 (Plk1) is an evolutionarily conserved serine/threonine kinase, and its N‐terminal kinase domain (KD) controls cell signaling through phosphorylation. Inhibitors of Plk1 are potential anticancer drugs. Most known Plk1 KD inhibitors are ATP‐competitive compounds, which may suffer from low selectivity. In this study we discovered novel non‐ATP‐competitive Plk1 KD inhibitors by virtual screening and experimental studies. Potential binding sites in Plk1 KD were identified by using the protein binding site detection program Cavity. The identified site was subjected to molecular‐docking‐based virtual screening. The activities of top‐ranking compounds were evaluated by in vitro enzyme assay with full‐length Plk1 and direct binding assay with Plk1 KD. Several compounds showed inhibitory activity, and the most potent was found to be 3‐((2‐oxo‐2‐(thiophen‐2‐yl)ethyl)thio)‐6‐(pyridin‐3‐ylmethyl)‐1,2,4‐triazin‐5(4H)‐one (compound 4 ) with an IC₅₀ value of 13.1±1.7 μm . Our work provides new insight into the design of kinase inhibitors that target non‐ATP binding sites.     

Bisubstrate Inhibitors of Protein Kinases: from Principle to Practical Applications

Bisubstrate inhibitors consist of two conjugated fragments, each targeted to a different binding site of a bisubstrate enzyme. The design of bisubstrate inhibitors presupposes the formation of the ternary complex in the course of the catalyzed reaction. The principle advantage of bisubstrate inhibitors is their ability to generate more interactions with the target enzyme that could result in improved affinity and selectivity of the conjugates, when compared with single‐site inhibitors. Among phosphotransferases, the approach was first successfully used for adenylate kinase in 1973. Since then, several types of bisubstrate inhibitors have been developed for protein kinases, including conjugates of peptides with nucleotides, adenosine derivatives and potent ATP‐competitive inhibitors. Earlier bisubstrate inhibitors had pharmacokinetic qualities that were unsuitable for cellular experiments and hence were mostly used for in vitro studies. The recently constructed conjugates of adenosine derivatives and D ‐arginine‐rich peptides (ARCs) possess high kinase affinity, high biological and chemical stability and good cell plasma membrane penetrative properties that enable their application in the regulation of cellular protein phosphorylation balances in cell and tissue experiments.     

A Comprehensive Structural Overview of p38α Mitogen‐Activated Protein Kinase in Complex with ATP‐Site and Non‐ATP‐Site Binders

Herein we review all the currently available ATP‐site and non‐ATP‐site ligands bound to p38α mitogen‐activated protein kinase (MAPK) available in the RCSB Protein Data Bank (PDB). The co‐crystallized inhibitors have been classified into different families according to their experimental binding mode and chemical structure, and the ligand–protein interactions are discussed using the most representative compounds. This systematic structural analysis could provide some take‐home lessons for drug discovery programs aimed at the rational identification and optimization of new p38α MAPK inhibitors.     

Discovery of 7‐Aryl‐Substituted (1,5‐Naphthyridin‐4‐yl)ureas as Aurora Kinase Inhibitors

As part of our research projects to identify new chemical entities of biological interest, we developed a synthetic approach and the biological evaluation of (7‐aryl‐1,5‐naphthyridin‐4‐yl)ureas as a novel class of Aurora kinase inhibitors for the treatment of malignant diseases based on pathological cell proliferation. 1,5‐Naphthyridine derivatives showed excellent inhibitory activities toward Aurora kinases A and B, and the most active compound, 1‐cyclopropyl‐3‐[7‐(1‐methyl‐1H‐pyrazol‐4‐yl)‐1,5‐naphthyridin‐4‐yl]urea ( 49 ), displayed IC₅₀ values of 13 and 107 nM against Aurora kinases A and B, respectively. In addition, the selectivity toward a panel of seven cancer‐related protein kinases was highlighted. In vitro ADME properties were also determined in order to rationalize the difficulties in correlating antiproliferative activity with Aurora kinase inhibition. Finally, the good safety profile of these compounds imparts promising potential for their further development as anticancer agents.     

Lewis y Regulate Cell Cycle Related Factors in Ovarian Carcinoma Cell RMG-I in Vitro via ERK and Akt Signaling Pathways

Objective

To investigate the effect of Lewis y overexpression on the expression of proliferation-related factors in ovarian cancer cells.

Methods

mRNA levels of cyclins, CDKs, and CKIs were measured in cells before and after transfection with the α1,2-fucosyltransferase gene by real-time PCR, and protein levels of cyclins, CDKs and CKIs were determined in cells before and after gene transfection by Western blot.

Results

Lewis y overexpression led to an increase in both mRNA and protein expression levels of cyclin A, cyclin D1 and cyclin E in ovarian cancer cells, decrease in both mRNA and protein expression levels of p16 and p21, and decrease of p27 at only the protein expression level without change in its mRNA level. There were no differences in proteins and the mRNA levels of CDK2, CDK4 and CDK6 before and after gene transfection. Anti-Lewis y antibody, ERK and PI3K pathway inhibitors PD98059 and {"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"LY294002","term_id":"1257998346","term_text":"LY294002"}}LY294002 reduced the difference in cyclin and CKI expression caused by Lewis y overexpression.

Conclusion

Lewis y regulates the expression of cell cycle-related factors through ERK/MAPK and PI3K/Akt signaling pathways to promote cell proliferation.     

Cell‐Permeable β‐Peptide Inhibitors of p53/hDM2 Complexation

Look at what the cat(ionic motif) dragged in! We report a general strategy to increase the cell permeability of β³‐peptides. Introduction of a minimal cationic motif within the folded structure of a high‐affinity β³‐peptide ligand for hDM2 led to molecules with high 3₁₄‐helical structure, high hDM2 affinity and sufficient cell permeability to upregulate p53‐dependent genes in live mammalian cells. Minimally cationic β³‐peptides represent the critical first step towards a class of protease‐resistant peptidomimetics that might modulate intracellular biological pathways.

     

Toward Angiogenesis Inhibitors Based on the Conjugation of Organometallic Platinum(II) Complexes to RGD Peptides

A novel conjugate between a cyclometalated platinum(II) complex with dual antiangiogenic and antitumor activity and a cyclic peptide containing the RGD sequence (‐Arg‐Gly‐Asp‐) has been synthesized by combining solid‐ and solution‐phase methodologies. Although peptide conjugation rendered a non‐cytotoxic compound in all tested tumor cell lines (± α_Vβ₃ and α_Vβ₅ integrin receptors), the antiangiogenic activity of the Pt‐c(RGDfK) conjugate in human umbilical vein endothelial cells at sub‐cytotoxic concentrations opens the way to the design of a novel class of angiogenesis inhibitors through conjugation of metallodrugs with high antiangiogenic activity to cyclic RGD‐containing peptides or peptidomimetic analogues.     

Peptidomimetic Polo-Box-Targeted Inhibitors that Engage PLK1 in Tumor Cells and Are Selective against the PLK3 Tumor Suppressor

The polo-box domain (PBD) of PLK1 determines mitotic substrate recognition and subcellular localization. Compounds that target PLK1 selectively are required due to the tumor-suppressor roles of PLK3. A structure-activity analysis of the PBD phosphopeptide binding motif has identified potent peptides that delineate the determinants required for mimicry by nonpeptidic inhibitors and provide insights into the structural basis for the selectivity of inhibitors for the PLK1 PBD. Fragment-ligated inhibitory peptides (FLIPs) obtained through REPLACE have been optimized to enhance in vitro binding and a systematic analysis of selectivity for PLK1 vs PLK3 has been carried out for peptides and peptidomimetics. Furthermore, these more drug-like non-ATP-competitive inhibitors had on-target engagement in a cellular context, as evidenced by stabilization of PLK1 in a thermal-shift assay and by inhibition of the phosphorylation of TCTP, a target of PLK1. Investigation in cells expressing a mutant PLK1 showed that these cells are sensitive to PBD inhibitors but dramatically resistant to clinically investigated ATP-competitive compounds. These results further validate targeting the PBD binding site in the move towards PLK1 inhibitors that are active against tumors resistant to ATP inhibitors.     

High‐Throughput Virtual Screening Using Quantum Mechanical Probes: Discovery of Selective Kinase Inhibitors

A procedure based on semi‐empirical quantum mechanical (QM) calculations of interaction energy is proposed for the rapid screening of compound poses generated by high‐throughput docking. Small molecules (consisting of 2–10 atoms and termed “probes”) are overlapped with polar groups in the binding site of the protein target. The interaction energy values between each compound pose and the probes, calculated by a semi‐empirical Hamiltonian, are used as filters. The QM probe method does not require fixed partial charges and takes into account polarization and charge‐transfer effects which are not captured by conventional force fields. The procedure is applied to screen ～100 million poses (of 2.7 million commercially available compounds) obtained by high‐throughput docking in the ATP binding site of the tyrosine kinase erythropoietin‐producing human hepatocellular carcinoma receptor B4 (EphB4). Three QM probes on the hinge region and one at the entrance pocket are employed to select for binding affinity, while a QM probe on the side chain of the so‐called gatekeeper residue (a hypervariable residue in the kinome) is used to enforce selectivity. The poses with favorable interactions with the five QM probes are filtered further for hydrophobic matching and low ligand strain. In this way, a single‐digit micromolar inhibitor of EphB4 with a relatively good selectivity profile is identified in a multimillion‐compound library upon experimental tests of only 23 molecules.